I wonder if the S.E.C. are looking into anyone who may have profited illegally by trading on Valcom inside information?

So you admit that Vince NEVER Hired you and that VALCOM had NO AGREEMENT with you, So Now I see why all these post about Lawyers is simply un-true and have absolutely NOTHING to do with VINCE or VALCOM.

That's right Joel Wertman the music producer of the project selected my company, as stated in previous posts.
Vince did pick the Santa Claus playing, trailerpark living, hillbilly, fellow con artist Dale O Smith to doctor the inventory value, I believe.

Is seems to be very difficult to understand tiger.

We all know, that all of the financials are not audited. Ok?
But the following 10K will be audited. And Valcom decided by themself to audit the financials. So this is enough....

And there is no reason to believe, that they act not honest, if they voluntarily audit their financials.

This is all I wanted to say to this issue.

Maybe someone can else call the SEC and ask them what is going on and tell us... Thanks in advance.

Last time I checked, VALCOM was NOT required to report any Financials, I might be wrong here, I mean this is a Penny Stock Company and Pinks, No claim to know it all, Just read up on things, I might have missed that page. But here is some good reading when all else fails, VALCOM 101 +1/2 I will call it...

http://www.otcbb.com/faqs/otcbb_faq.stm

Oh and may I remind the Investors here, They are the ONLY Ones that VALCOM needs to communicate with. So unless you can prove the Investor line, Ingrid nor VALCOM need prove nothing. Just saying.

Sorry Bruce, NEVER heard of you. I am surprised that Vince would pull from such a small time seemingly dead company to do any work on anything they had that needed services that you supposedly offer. OH Wait.. That's Right VINCE or VALCOM NEVER HIRED YOU! Gezzz Guess VINCE was smart there. Just saying.

Again ONLY assumptions, No FACTS, I Know why you have not received a return call, Guess you will have to do further DD. I feel the REASON for lack of Daily UPDATES on the websites you mentioned, Speculation on my part.. Maybe just MAYBE they are busy taking care of the BUSINESS at hand. I didn't see where the WEBSITE was part of the DAY to DAY Business. Please what SUBSTANTIATED FACTS do you bring to support your OUT THERE comments? We await your Links .... Good Day!

I stand corrected regarding the Michel Legrand special as that was a live show. My error lay in the fact that it was recently shown (last December) on PBS.

I called the 800 number that was left on the board for the SEC...the recording stated that if you were specifically asking for information about a company, the SEC would not be able to provide this information. You could leave a message but so far I have not received a return call.

The Valcom web site needs to be updated. The My Family TV site needs some updating as well. Must not be a high priority for the company right now or maybe there is no one available to do it.

TP

Pacal, I only do Audio work. My website may be outdated, but mainly because the bulk of my work is returning clients and word of mouth. I also have gotten several NDA jobs in the last few years so no press there.

Believe what you want.

PBS? Michel Legrand special ? When did PBS have anything with Valcom? And when did a "Special" become a NETWORK? Really?

I can attest to the FACT that VALCOM is a REAL Business operating a TV NETWORK 24 hours per day 7 days per week. Now What really matters? I think that placing my comfort with a REAL Business that has REAL people that provide a daily product has much more weight than someone making claims that they "OWE THEM MONEY" for a Business transaction that has only been validated by the accuser without any FACTS to PROVE his claims are TRUTHFUL. Not to mention the ONLY Business this person has claim to in the world is AUDIO work, NO mention of VIDEO work on his website as of TODAY. That site was last updated in 2006 but yet VALCOM is said to be behind on their updates ... Hummm who will I put my money on, The one that has a PROVEN Business or some guy that CLAIMS to be a victim of the EVIL DOER Vince? Yeah Right...

I haven't even mentioned his Cheer leading section with again baseless OPINION being brought out.. Yawn....

FACTS MAM ....ONLY THE FACTS.....

PS: All these calls for contacting the SEC and getting the INFO that has been requested shows the lack of experience in the SEC in the USA as they do NOT speak for any company or give out any info that is NOT related to the SEC directly. Wow.. Come on now.. Lets get rolling here with more FACTS Please.

I wont even explain the correct means of gathering DD since the odds are it wont be understood LOL... Just saying...

Don't waste your time Missy, just do what I do and ignore them... They (Tigerpac and Smiteman) have been asked numerous times in the past to post links other than self produced accusations and emails and can't provide anything of substance. I am looking at this investment long term, the short term distractions will soon be forgotten if they capitalize on everything in the works... time will tell.

you can read charts? there is like one bid sell about 110k. then a buy about 270k, one over 50k and 3 about 30-40k, rest peanuts. i got the same question like davel0r, can someone call the SEC to discuss it with them?

Believe what you want and laugh about others. Does not bother me. I know how the Rathods work and you dont. Bye.

Can somebody call the SEC eventually from the US and ask whether they have some information belonging the Valcom filing?

I also got a message from the SEC to discuss the filing.

BRYAN BURKE
(800) 732-0330

Thanks in advance

I just asked a simple question as to your proof of the statement:

Tiger always wants to talk about facts, but he never provides facts for other people. Always a guess, an accusation and he always causes tongues to wag... Ans thats exactly his goal. I think...

You are the one saying they are not involved... I want proof... But again I guess I just have to take your word on that.

Missy

You are just providing another statement of opinion and no facts....

Interesting

But that is JMO

Missy

Haha, peanuts! We still have our shares. And holding. As long as Asia Pacific Inv and Solomed hold their shares...

PBS and the Michel Legrand special was the last major network Valcom was involved with...Valcom still owes so much money on this special..check the financials...none of their other shows involves a major network. Vince would be PR'ing that all the over the internet if he had something.

Missy..i've got a better idea...what don't YOU find me proof that Valcom is involved with one of those networks today.

TP

Meanwhile, as we have been each trying to get our points across, someone has been selling off their shares as the stock is now below it's latest trading range of .033 - .040.

Uncomfortable with the lack of numbers? The SEC maybe?

Missy...Proof on what?

We have been speaking about many issues today.

TP

Want to provide proof or should we take your word on it?

Missy

Since Investor Relations is just that, INVESTORS, I would think that any REAL Investor could and would get any and all information when asked for that is available LEGALLY from the company, I Note over 3k of investors (FACTUAL) and here we have only 188 so called "Interested parties" Hummm Yes VALCOM is doing REAL Business daily. Not many around the penny stocks can say that. Just saying...

I was talking about the valcom website, especially the investors relation subpage. It is outdated. No word about major networks.

Take that into account please

Really?

Please link me to where the MAJOR NETWORKS are connected to VALCOM on their website? TY in advance

See comprehension is important to understanding. You stated that you were highly skilled in the entertainment industry... and that TV Subs was on a decline, So CBS, NBC, ABC, FOX and LUKIN (Whom you did leave out since it was directly connected to VALCOM) So again you stated as someone with knowledge in this industry, I challenged that by suggesting the 4 MAJOR TV Networks, In the USA of course. So now with all this so called PROOF that the TV Industry is in trouble I guess we ALL better run and get NEW Entertainment sources at Wal-Mart... Oh wait.. TVs are are the UP and Up here in the US in NEW Sales...

Please, Seriously.....

Yes, on the website issue I Do agree and this is indeed weird. I was thinking about it for a longer time. Especially the investors relations subpage is certainly outdated. Weird for a modern company. I mean, we live in the internet age and an accurate homepage worths a lot nowadays.

... no not the last financials, they were not audited, you are true.

But the following one, which was due the 28th of December.

I just showed you rthe Accountant's Compilation Report that says the financials ARE NOT audited. That is a fact. You are wrong.

< they neither need to audit their actual financials. But they do and this is extraordenary for OTC stocks. >

How long ago were these networks involved with Valcom? Show me any recent history...Valcom hasn't updated it's website in forever...wants people to believe that these networks are involved when it's surely not the case.

<Guess CBS, ABC, NBC, FOX>

And by the way: Tock, tock, tock! Anyone home? Wake up for the new Valcom world, the old one is past and gone. Nalin + Rahul. End of transmission...

The biggest copout excuse that I have read on this board.

Way to not say anything. Talk about lack of facts...lol.

< believe nothing what is written in this forum. I believe what people in my company and affiliates tell me during business every day. Even facts about accountants from Singapur.

And I do not post it, cause nobody will believe me.>

You will get no proof, of course. And you should know why. WE need no other proof anymore...LOL.

Based upon my research of Bruce, it appears that the industry very much likes his work. He has worked with some of the biggest music names. Names that you can contact and verify his work. Not like Valcom where it's hard to verify anything.

His legal action, while amusing reading, jives with everything that has been written about Valcom to date. They have a difficult time paying vendors, they make deals that they PR only later to find out they are in litigation (Auction TV anyone?). Why does most everything that Valcom touches wind up in litigation? Is it ALWAYS the other companies fault?

TP

Tiger, they neither need to audit their actual financials. But they do and this is extraordenary for OTC stocks.

So this should be enough to understand that they are trying to be honest. Even if at the moment things dont satisfy. But we will see soon when we got the audited numbers.

So lets talk about facts... And your point is not a fact, but a suspicion...

I do focus on FOX...

Bruce, I am listening to you, I want have faith in you, PLEASE PROVIDE a FACT. Just ONE that I can verify. Not an email that can be considered doctored. FACTS. I checked out you website if you are who you claim to. I see ONLY Audio endorsements The last year any claim to fame was in 2006. So what are we to take from this? Curious, Just bring something we can sink our teeth into as a FACT. Thanks.

Nothing new. Seen a thousand times. Not unique only for Valcom.

Really?

CPA's Compiliation Report

Please read this very carefully. It was included in the last year's 10-K filed 2/8/11:

Accountant’s Compilation Report


Board of Directors and Stockholders
Valcom, Inc.


We have compiled the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Valcom, Inc. as of September 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, retained earnings, and cash flows for the year then ended. We have not audited or reviewed the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or provide any assurance about whether the financial statements are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and for designing, implementing, and maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements.


Our responsibility is to conduct the compilation in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The objective of a compilation is to assist management in presenting financial information in the form of financial statements without undertaking to obtain or provide any assurance that there are no material modifications that should be made to the financial statements.


Labrozzi & Co., PA
Miami, Florida
February 7, 2011

=======================================
So the CPA firm's only job was to show Valcom how to take their information and put it into an Income Statement, Balance Sheet, and Cash Flows format. In fact it's likely the firm provide blank forms that just needed numbers to be inserted by the company.

With Valcom's track record of reporting, many of you are sure putting a lot of faith into numbers that no one really knows, maybe not even the company itself.

TP

pacal, I have provided facts to this board. You and many others choose not to believe them. That is your right. Luckly others have looked into my facts and have had them confirmed by Ingrid.

Sub,

The SEC is not going to answer any questions that you have. You will be directed to call the company.

As far as I whether or not I am invested in the company, I'll let you keep guessing as it is obviously driving everyone crazy here. Who cares if i am?

I get my information from the internet, from Ingrid, from calling around, and from knowing how to read financial statements. I also know enough about the entertainment business to know when someone is trying to say one thing but his actions over the past few years says something completely different.

Where are the revenues from ALL the ventures that VV has PR'd? What happened to all the iTunes relases? The MJ movie and DVD? Show us the numbers Vince!

The only solid deal that can be proven is the FilmOn deal but again we haven't see actual reported revenue numbers. My Family TV seems to be expanding but without numbers who really knows. The revenue per subscriber gain has gone down substantially in the TV business over the years so you might need twice as many new viewers now to earn the same revenue you received three years ago.

But without numbers who knows. Especially when there are no AUDITED numbers. You can see why no CPA firm wants to stick its neck out for Valcom. I'll post the CPA's Compilation Report from last year in my next post.

TP

This is not about Smiteman aka Bruce, If there were any FACTS to his postings there would be a PUBLIC LINK to it. In my conversations with VALCOM there are NO pending litigation from this person. Just his claims on a PUBLIC BLOG with NOTHING to substantiate his claims. Emails have been proven to be doctored on these boards. I strongly suggest that this person IF Real provide factual substantiated information and not just claims of malfeasance without Factual documentations.

If this person is in fact who and what he says he is, Imagine how the industry looks at him today. WHISTLE BLOWING is a GOOD thing, But ONLY if its FACTUAL.

Please provide links to your claims Mr. Smiteman, We await the FACTS.

Are you watching it? I have no problem with any other revenue streams that Valcom has. I have stated in the past that if they could make HALF of there P.R. pumps happen it would be one hell of a company. My problem with valcom is not being paid for creating content for them. The Library evauluation is what is going to bring this company down. Pure Greed on 2 persons part.

I believe nothing what is written in this forum. I believe what people in my company and affiliates tell me during business every day. Even facts about accountants from Singapur.

And I do not post it, cause nobody will believe me.

Neo, I am providing Facts about Valcom and it's management.

Ridiculous that you even have to ask that question regarding bruce/smite...anyone who can use the internet can find out they are the same person....he has not even remotely been vague about that.

Could someone of you guys could phone Bruce Maddocks at Cups n' Strings please, to verify that he and Smiteman is one person?

I can't believe that the owner of a company is posting on a IHub thread about non payed bills and all that stuff.

Rediculous...

Cheers from Neo