Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Hahaha. Just read the rGBM stats, if you can understand, in the JAMA data. In fact, abeta posted the table yesterday. The fudster has zero idea of the efficacy data. His objective is to fud and get paid. Ask nonsensical questions and when people don't care to answer them, imagine that he asked unanswerable questions. LOL.
Fudster-delusion has zero knowledge of the trial history, trial numbers, and trial data. The fudster posts in order to get paid. His knowledge in GBM trials is close to zero and his posts show that.
Really? Paid fudding is superior to unpaid company support by Doc? You are paid to fud against this therapy and have zero values in your posts.
Hahaha. You mean to say a patient seeks a therapy if he has no need for it? What a joke! Anyway, you seem to have never understood the JAMA stats.
Don't expect you to agree or change. But there is no denying that fudding and getting paid involves a personal choice. Fortunately your fud posts are quite banal and have zero effect. Even fudster-extraordinaire's lying posts are not having any effect. Such is fud life after the real stats are published.
No one here knows. Not important. If you knew what is important in the JAMA data in terms of unprecedented GBM efficacy stats, you wouldn't be asking.
Nah. I would like to observe how low a person can get in life with taking pleasure in posting fud and earning cash.
AF knows just as much as you do - which amounts to a big fat zero.
The fudsters are like the klingons today, grasping at straws and fudding banal stuff about manufacturing and PFS. Looks like the JAMA data did their fud in. Fudster-extraordinaire is a shell of his former self, and his lying posts have lost the punch. The fudster is still trying to generate some fud but has been miserably ineffective. I think once the approvals start coming in, he will depart with his tail in between his legs.
Totally nonsensical post. The fudster has no idea about the JAMA results as well as the ECA guidance. He is just whisting in the dark, doing his master's bidding for a morsel of bread.
A lying post doesn't hurt your reputation, paid fudster.
Nonsensical post by the fudster. He wants us to believe in the myths that he propagates through this post.
Since you asked, LC works for a shady firm that pays him to generate fud and besmirch this therapy. Nothing more and nothing less.
Another delusional post by fudster-delusion.
In the last para, we have yet another of fudster-extraordinaire's predictions that is bound to go to pot, just like all of his prior predictions did.
In any case, not too concerned about the fudsters' posts. The JAMA article negated most of their influence and their job has become of none effect. Nobody puts too much stock in fudster-delusion's posts in particular.
Another post by fudster-extraordinaire that is full of lies.
The fud generated by fudster-delusion with his zero knowledge of this therapy is voluminous. Just goes to show that it doesn't take much understanding to generate fud. Just take some zoom fud training and there you go. The fudster's posts display zero understanding of the JAMA data.
Agree with absolutely, Bio. The fudsters are trying to turn the strong point manufacturing capability into something negative. The jokers are here to spread fud and confuse the newbies. What a way to make a living!
Fudster-delusion has zero knowledge of the trial numbers, trial data, and trial history. That's all that matters. You are here to generate fud posts and make a living out of it.
Bio, the fudsters are throwing stuff on the wall from an oft repeated favorite fud topic of revenue to see if it sticks. As you say, fake points by ignoring the future potential.
Irrelevant nonsense. It is the future potential following the approvals that counts.
The fudster is loyal to a tee to his employers. Sham posts to boot.
The fudsters' topic of the day is 'Advent.' The fud objective to make a strong point look like a weak link. The fudsters don't get the simple concept that the demonstration of maufacturing capability is essential prior to the approvals.
Instead of asking these banal questions, the fudster needs to understand the JAMA results. The fudster never demonstrated an understanding of the trial results in any of his posts. If he gets to understand the results, then he would understand the future potential. Until that time, the fudster's confusion persists and he would be asking these kinds of nonsensical hypothetical questions.
Excellent, hope. After this therapy becomes the next SOC, further improvements coming out of the UCLA combos can be potentially added on.
Duty of Loyalty: The fudster will fud no matter what the data shows. He will be loyal and will carry on deception and shanghai the investors using high sounding terminology. The fudster will be loyal to his employer and perform fud duties. Performance bonuses will depend on how much effective fud he generates.
Fudster-HyGro doesn't even know diddly-squat about the ECA guidelines.
There is only fudster-delusion present here. Trying to give the impression that multiple fudsters are caring about the issues, but fudster-delusion's awful writing style gives it away. Now he is going to go and wake fudster-extraordinaire up from sleep to save face.
I see that fudster-delusion is already subbing for fudster-extraordinaire. Can tell by the banality of the post.
Overtime pay is not everything to life. Spend some time with family this weekend, fudster.
Yawn. Zzzzz.
This shouldn't concern you. You have no part in this venture. Your posts have been irrelevant, and they haven't mattered after the publication of the JAMA article. You don't even know it.
No point in dealing with this oft repeated nonsense. The fudster posts on social media only to get paid.
This is another lying post of yours. No need to expand on this nonsensical post. They don't call you fudster-extraordinaire for no reason.
If a fudster predicted fud outcomes in the past and even one of them never materialized, then the outcome of the current fud predictions can be deduced from the past failure rate. Batting average of 100% is safe.
Is Friday the pay day, fudster-of-2023?