Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm not one of those people who cries "SHORT", for two reasons, first off, the law allows shorting, and secondly, in the end, solid financials and business model execution is why I invest in a stock.
However, if any stock is shorted, and the company puts out solid financials, it may cause shorts to be cured in a rapid manner.
I did the same HS24, and I was told the same thing. "Only brokers can trade at those levels". If anyone knows any different. Let us know!
So, I have day traded off and on for the past 15 years, I am not always in the market. I look for certain criteria in a stock. I have rules for Penny stocks and if your company doesn't fit all of my rules, I don't buy stock in the company.
Non-traditional rules I follow:
1. Do “strange” trades occur on the subject stock? In the case of BDGR, a) why do broker only trades keep happening, these trades either cause the stock to close for the day at a level that day traders can’t participate or stay printed long after new shares are bought and not printed, leaving the $.000001 printed? b) Why does the number of shares on the ask seem to be un-ending? In the subject stock, no day trader is making money at $.0001, so who is offering to sell their shares at a total loss when the news is coming out, albeit painstakingly slow? I could understand if the shares were a limited amount. My conclusion for this first rule on BDGR is that the only persons benefitting from these unusual or strange trades would be brokers. Which means that if the company is real and starts producing revenues these brokers will naturally be some of the primary market makers for us.
2. Is there an overwhelming amount of “disgruntled” supposed shareholders? These supposed shareholders ragging on the stock via stock boards, social media and any other platform they can. When an opportunity presents itself for the stock to actually perform and possibly increase shareholder value, a sudden onslaught of nay-sayers begin pouring out useless information. This tells me, someone or some group doesn’t want the stock to increase in value. Conclusion: This means, I am interested in this stock. BDGR has its share of non-sensical pontification.
3. When a company shows no information available. I have used Buyins.net and shortsqueeze.com to get some basic corporate information I can’t find elsewhere. When you go to these sites and they say “no information is available”, this means to me that some information should be available and the lack of information means powers that be, may not want you to know the truth. Conclusion: This may not be of real importance with BDGR. The public information on BDGR is so poor, it wouldn’t surprise me if in this case, these companies couldn’t find true information about BDGR for their sites.
These are just a few of my rules for trading. I’ll provide more of them later, but I will promote the usual disclaimer that everyone should use your own thought processes and due diligence. Ask yourself, why is the trading of this stock so strange, why is it taking FINRA so darn long to perform such simple tasks, (I mean, I know they’re government employees… ??)
I would like to start an intelligent conversation about the "HitMe App Overview", if anyone else would like to go through it with me.
I once retired on a penny stock, and then the owner decided he would fight the SEC, and we all lost, due to his arrogance. I have done well on a few other, but I think this stock is going to be positive over the next 12 months and beyond.
Baseline Statements on BDGR.
1. This is NOT a good short play with current outstanding and price.
2. The broker attempts to keep the stock at .000001 before close is intriguing. These trades have been reported to OTCMARKETS.
a.) Could it be to keep the price low for when the average is done for the stock price post-reverse? – Smart but won’t last after first quarter results are posted.
b.) Or has this stock been shorted as badly as rumor has it? If I were in this position, I would start now filling my short positions now, before the app is complete and Clients start using the new financial network the next day.
3. I’m not worried about these questionable broker trades. I believe this company is real, and will prove it, over the next 12 months.
4. The company should complete its corporate goals, becoming a fully reporting company, start highly profitable business model, and the stock will eventually reflect the appropriate share price to revenues.
Do your own DD, Agree or Disagree, Just my HO.
Yeah, Papa, it seems the don't want to print accurate information on this stock.
HAHA You're SO FUNNY. Anyone no sarcasm? Just wait shorter. Your days are numbered.
Yep Nothing going on here with this stock.
What if the company was doing a reverse of like 5000-1, name change and waiting on FINRA to approve the changes? That would put the stock at .50 per share right?
How was this company disseminating information 10 years ago? Was it Twitter? Or has the law changed since then? Now companies can disseminate information via social media? Including a twitter account? So, according to you they should never create a new Social media account?
I have been in this stock for 10 years. It has done absolutely nothing. Why now, is this a pump? And if it is why do I care? If I can finally get out of this POS? I hope they pump the ever living shit out of it and I can get my money back out. Just seems like your comment comes from a zero shareholder perspective. Otherwise, why would you make such an ambiguous statement?
@bdgrnewco is this us? Is something new coming?
First Post... Is this "our" Tom Neely http://obits.oregonlive.com/obituaries/oregon/obituary.aspx?n=tom-neely-tv&pid=188528040