Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I do not frequent bars!
Yes, he can do that IF HE IS PRESIDENT - EVEN IF HE IS IN PRISON.
I believe tomorrow is the day - at any time they choose.
That is a ridiculous reach!
The question was why would either side prefer the magistrate rather than the judge to continue on the case?
Should be out on Friday.
I agree with you that this had been debated at length. I too thought that calendar days were meant, and most of us so assumed. I am now hearing that it is business days.
He obviously meant selling as president on behalf of NWBO to investors, such as for warrant exercise and PP. He did not mean selling her own shares in NWBO.
Does anyone have a copy of the Mar 22, 2024
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
What are the dates for the various responses back and forth?
Gary, CHATGPT seems to only be referencing "legal" ways to do this. I would ask it specifically about illegal way to accomplish this and in particular using naked shorting which CHAT did not mention. It is not clear what it meant in the the paragraph starting Dark pools ....
I have heard this before, and sort of accepted it without giving it much thought. However, I am now not sure about this. Take in particular item 4 of your list "when a dividend is given..." How exactly does this work to force the hand of the naked short selllers? Who does what to solve the problem? It can not be any action by NWBO to research to whom to pay the dividend. Because any research they can do, they can do with or without declaring a dividend. So it must be the "shareholders" asking for their dividend. First of all, many of the "naked shares" may in hands of those friendly to the "naked sellers." They may not come asking for any dividend - they are looking to catch bigger fish. And even for those who do announce themselves for the dividend (many may not even realize they hold "false naked shares), ultimately it will still be on NWBO to research whether they are "true shareholders" or false "naked shareholders" to whom no dividend is due. So they may have a billion plus shares to track. This is a lot of work. How do they do this? What records can they access to make this determination that they didn't have before? Can they force a long chain of ownership to declare themselves many of whom no longer claim a holding in NWBO and have no interest to respond.
Won't be long now!
Skit, whatever the production costs actually come to, with or without EDEN, this will not be the largest part of the price for the treatment. The major element of the price charged will be the recovery of the many hundreds of millions of dollars spent over decades by investors to develop this revolutionary science and technology.
Yes, you are correct. As I responded to your last post, I am exercising warrants and holding. I am not selling them when I exercise and I am sure most longs will not sell them when we are finally so close to approval.
Absolutely true. I, and I am sure others, are slowly exercising warrants I (we) held, and still hold many more to go.
I am not sure how well founded an assumption that "DCVAX" is always a reference to the NWBO treatment. On this board that is undoubtedly what is meant. But in the rest of the world, including the academic world, I am not sure that is always the case. I think that that word has been made generic to mean a vaccine (VAX) based on dendritic cells (DC) in a fairly generic way, whose process and MOA may be quite different (or not) than that of the NWBO vaccine. Now if the reference is to DCVAX-L or DCVAX-Direct that is of course another story.
Generally, i like your thinking on this, even if some of your prognostication does not come to pass.
Not quite. True that volumes are low now with only a little retail investor buying. The reason there is so little retail buying mow, is given that for now the control is in the hand of the shorts, Why would a retailer buy now when the fix is in (UNTIL NEWS) that it will drop a penny or so every day. Why would they buy now. But just wait until the NEWS starts to flow over the next 60 days or so and watch what happens to the volume and the share price.
It is my belief that what is keeping the share price down now is the short selling by the defendants and others - not so much the spoofing. Spoofing mainly works by fooling people, but when everyone knows the spoofing is going on, I doubt it is very effective. What is now working to keep the share price down very effectively is continued short selling or even worse more naked short selling. I really want to see the Posner lawsuit for the illegal naked short selling!
Do you think that DCVAX-Direct might be helpful as a preventative measure if given in the location from where the tumor was removed if there was some tiny bit of cancer not removed by the surgery?
No, my calculation is somewhat different. It is not just having to pay capital gain tax on the first $4 and then moving it into the TFSA after uplist. The much larger loss is that I will then only be able to transfer about one ninth the number of shares! That is the real sad part of the story! Thus counting the initial $4 I would have been able to protect some 10 times the shares from capital gains as I will be able to down the road. -- Really huge difference. Sorry for the sad news.
Sojo, I have no NWBO inside a TFSA, my questions were about getting NWBO into my TFSA. It was back and forth for a while, but I think the bottom line is that NWBO is OTC, and the Stuttgart trading is also just OTC there, so that CRA will not allow NWBO to qualify. Two of my brokers refused to place my NWBO into my TFSA. Therefore, if I understand things correctly, if you do have some NWBO in a TFSA I would strongly consider moving them out as soon as possible IMHO. There may be penalties involved. But please verify this on your own with your own qualified advisor, which I am not.
Thank you.
is there a link to where Hoff posts elsewhere. I do want to read him.
I find it strange that the steep down drop showed no volume change while the steep volume at the bottom of the drop showed no change in price upward. Its almost like they moved those shares from someone's left pocket to their right pocket so that the overall market showed no pressure upward.
I have seen this pattern in trading of NWBO before during our continuous manipulated downtrend. On my chart for today's trading the pattern to me is counter-intuitive during the short period from say 1:30 PM TO 2:00 PM. it starts with a slow down trend at about 0.498 at a relatively steady but low volume. As you approach about 1:45 or so a steep decline happens over maybe 5-10 minutes to about 0.483 or so, BUT THE VOLUME DOESN'T CHANGE AND SEEMS TO CONTINUE THE STEADY VOLUME just as before the decline. Then once the decline has ended you suddenly get a sharp steep momentary uptick a little short of 200K in the volume. Then the volume resumes its previous slow steady levels as before and continues horizontally at the new level it found at about 0.483 or so a little before 2:00 PM.
I would think that the sudden sharp drop in price without any volume change is strange. what is causing the drop in price? It looks as though the sharp short peak in volume is related to stropping the drop in price and starting the sidewise pattern of trading? Could this be shorts covering? This still does not explain what precipitates the sharp drop without any change in the volume pattern. anyone noticing this type of pattern and have an explanation for what is happening - spoofing or not.