Due to some personal events in my life involving traveling and work, I'm going to take my huge pile of shares and sit on the sidelines from afar to enjoy the show.

Do not take my absence as a sign of discouragement. Just the opposite. I'm quite enthused by the brilliance of everyone at Seafarer and Wild Manta.

Will the EXPL affiliate soon be "loading the boat" with shares of SFRX as promised? LOL!

Time will tell.

Tonnage, not trinkets!

🐐

EXPL affiliate wrong again.

That is something that will be done. I'm pretty sure they have tried it already but doing it is a lot more complicated than it sounds. Easy to say but much harder to do.

I think there are a few reasons to not do that just yet.

It seems like a simple solution but it's not.

I'm sure you don't mean to lie. You just can't help it can you?

EXPL affiliate still ignoring the calculations I see.

The great thing about SFRX succeeding in a huge way is that even the shareholders who don't understand what a teredo crust is nor understand the difficulties of running a penny stock company on a low budget with limited personnel will still get to reap the rewards.

Do you ever make a post that is useful to shareholders?

It's rhetorical.

Good luck with your attempts to paint Tim Reynolds as sloppy and ignorant of the rules.

Tonnage Trippy, not trinkets.

You and the EXPL affiliate have repeatedly conflated two different things.

Kyle got a valuation of $15 billion 15 years ago based on multiple available pieces of evidence at the time. While I've heard over and over heavy protestations against the valuation because someone at the Fisher company recently said they didn't give the valuation, I've not heard why their calculations were incorrect. That inconvenience is repeatedly ignored.

Never-the-less, a valuation was given to Kyle 15 years ago. So someone told Kyle what they thought it could be worth.

The SeaSearcher has not said there are tons of gold and silver under the teredo crust, as far as we know.

All we know for sure is that Seafarer has not moved on from Juno the way they did from Melbourne.

So there is an assumption from shareholders that there must be a good reason for them staying at Juno.

The SeaSearcher must be telling them there is something there. Otherwise, why keep pushing for a permit to be able to dig through the teredo crust? And yes, the technology has been vastly improved and is more accurate now than it was on the Melbourne site.

But, as far as we know, the SeaSearcher has not said there are tons of silver and gold under the teredo crust.

There is clearly something there. Something worthwhile from a mid-1500's wreck. Something very well worth all of the effort that has been put into going after the permit. And an actual ton of gold is not all that large so there very well could be multiple tons on site and under the crust. Do I remember correctly that Andrew the archeologist said there was 6-8 feet under the crust in some places? Very easy to physically have tons in spaces like that if that is the case.

But the conflation that you and the failed EXPL affiliate continue to make is simply not true.

It could be true. But, the company has not said what you are saying. Only you and the EXPL affiliate are saying it as something the company has said.

I personally think there will be tonnage found at Juno. But I'm not the company.

Whatever is found will put this company on the map and set it up for many future successful finds at numerous wreck sites around the world and allow the technology to move into other industries.

That alone is all I need the Juno wreck to do for SFRX.

But there I go again, trying to be reasonable. I know that won't go unpunished by those who don't own shares of SFRX.

But at this point, I don't care.

So with that I say...

Tonnage! Not trinkets!

Maybe I was thinking "About damn time, Reynolds!" 😀

Ooops. Fixed it.

But it is Tim's 'time' to shine, right?

About Tim Reynolds:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/timreynoldspb

Excellent point that the failed EXPL affiliate refuses to understand. A repeated pattern in his 7-year attack on SFRX.

Timing on the permit from COE is the magic question isn't it?

Yes, I have some ideas.

It's not something I'm concerned about. That we will get it or the timing.

Thanks for your suggestions. If Seafarer wants to find some trinkets, I'll let them know to look you up.

Meanwhile, we'll keep going for tonnage.

I did not say a third party could test it.

I said they are not going to give it to a third party. You would be stupid to believe or suggest they should.

"not even a trinket"

LOL!

Again, you are jumping to conclusions.

No, Max was not lying. I don't know the exact wording of his comment but yes, when the SeaSearcher is fully functioning, it can scan a site in a weekend.

But there's more to finding treasure on a site that just the physical act of scanning over a weekend. But yes, that specific part can be done over a weekend assuming the weather cooperates.

I know you like to over simplify things when it works to your advantage but the entire process of treasure hunting as a whole is complicated. Some people like to brag about finding trinkets, others are looking for tonnage.

You think they are going to give this tech to a third party to test?

Again, you fail to understand the significance of the tech.

Your questions would matter if the SeaSearcher tech was a proven technology.

And the only way to truly prove it works, is to produce some treasure on deck.

That is what actual shareholders are waiting on.

After the tech is proven, test results will mean a lot more than they do now.

Right. Regarding the permit:

It's complicated but a simplified version is that previously the COE rubber stamped whatever FBAR approved. So when FBAR was cut out of the process, a quick approval was expected. But, instead, because FBAR was cut out of the approval process, the COE then decided they needed to do more, a lot more, than they normally do. Only this had never been done before, so in a way, it was even worse. Thus our long delay of approval from the COE.

Approval from the COE is not an issue for me other than the fact it has taken so long already. It is not something that I worry we will never get.

They have done "in the field" simulation tests.

They do multiple tests in differing environments, the last being in the field aka in the ocean, near the site, so as to have conditions as close to the actual location as possible.

After that they run scans on the site and process that data.

So if I'm understanding you correctly, you are saying if they don't share the results of their tests with the public, that is suspicious for you?

And what would they need to do to "prove" the technology to you?

Because I would imagine if they came out with data and said this shows the tech works, they would be accused of making it up or lying.

It seems to me that the only way to 100% prove the tech works would be to announce treasure on Juno that was found with the SeaSearcher.

That would be proof that could not be questioned.

I think the fact that they have not "proven" the tech (via a large treasure find others missed) is reflected in the current share price being under a penny a share.

To complain that a penny stock doesn't have proof of its ground breaking multi-billion dollar technology seems like a waste of time. Of course not. That's why it's a penny stock.

After it's proven, it will no longer be a penny stock.

That's what Kyle, his related party investors, large investors, the crew and the scientists all expect to happen. They all put their money behind the company.

I've chosen to follow their lead. I think they know more about what is going on than outsiders who are not involved with the day to day operations.

Proof is coming btw. Proof no one can argue with.

And as you can see, current tech that shows images under the sand is very poor.

Another way the SeaSearcher is improving industry technology.

More free unsolicited advice from the failed EXPL affiliate.

Maybe he should have given more advice to EXPL? Or did they just not listen?

I prefer conclusive evidence myself.

If they have more detailed images vs. blurry images, great. But for now, those images need to be proven before being shown to the public.

Anything else would be unacceptable. Show the images after those targets are proven to be gold or silver. After the big announcement... or several announcements.

"This is what our tech shows and this is what it was." That will be conclusive proof.

After a few wrecks or at least multiple targets prove to be what they are, then, maybe, we can start to say hey, this is what are tech is telling us on these targets that we haven't dug up yet.

But not until then.

Looking forward to it!

Great news!

EXPL affiliate says Seafarer must have treasure!

To summarize: If the SeaSearcher hasn't already shown treasure via scans on Juno, why keep trying to get a permit?

For once, we agree! I also think Juno has treasure because if not, they would have ditched Juno like they ditched Melbourne.

Great news!

Wholeheartedly agree!

It's easy to get overly involved in the wrong things.

And more could be said about the company that is current and positive... by me. More people would be making comments and contributing if it wasn't for certain people attacking them and picking apart every word they say. In addition, when some positive information gets out, those same certain people actively get involved behind the scenes to prevent good things from happening for the company based on that information. Unsurprisingly, those same people will deny such things and ask for proof. No, none will be provided.

So yes, more could be said in a very different environment. More than one person who used to post has come to me and said they just got tired of the attacks every time they said something positive about Seafarer. So they stopped altogether.

99% of people are here for the right reasons. Sometimes one bad apple does spoil the bunch.

So I've tried to shed light on the motivations behind the bad apple.

Which fires up the defense shields and around and around we go. Which, unfortunately, still works for them.

Honestly, I think we are close enough my comments no longer will make any difference.

Lets see how things go and I'll stick to positive comments.

Looking forward to congratulating shareholders!

I've been demoted, banned, re-instated, banned again and re-instated again. My "red badge of courage" is soaked! LOL!

Meanwhile, failed EXPL affiliate still offering his advice nobody wants.

Hard pass. But if I want to turn a buck fifty into $0.0001 I know who to call.

So glad I've invested in a real company with real tech, real scientists and officers who refuse to participate in fraudulent shams!*

Tonnage not trinkets! It's coming!

* https://www.investmentnews.com/brokerage-firm-two-principals-found-guilty-of-stock-fraud-209860

Agree. It was basically rigged in favor of people wanting to spread lies.

Future of SFRX looking very solid!

EXPL Affiliate and self-appointed hall monitor is quite the conundrum.

He knows so little yet pretends to know everything.

And when he does know something he only presents the half that feeds his agenda.

I guess the EXPL affiliate hall monitor wanted to make a list.

Here's a list. And remember, I don't get compensated for being here, I'm just a shareholder (though some like to say I'm an affiliate with no evidence).

I'm not so sure I would put a lot of value in the word of anyone who once:

• Said to not buy a stock that later went up 3,000% (SFRX)

• Advised buying a stock that then went down 99.99% (EXPL)

• Had the gall to say the problem with EXPL, when it was trading around 50 cents, was that there was a lack of shares available and buyers were waiting for larger blocks to be available. EXPL now at .0001 and non-trading, non-reporting. Now says EXPL is “doing fine” and price doesn’t matter.

• Doesn't know the difference between a promissory note and a convertible note.

• Argues the tech for the SeaSearcher is imaginary while at the same time says it already exists.

• Pretends not to understand how the SeaSearcher has value.

• Is unable to see the expanding uses for the SeaSearcher tech in multiple industries and that it can be used on many wrecks, not just one

• Says Tim Reynolds does not understand salt water

• Implies the SFRX BOD is personally selling shares when they are not.

• Says no one is promoting EXPL while promoting EXPL at the same time

• Attacks a company for 7 years without owning shares while also claiming they have a buy order submitted to "load the boat" with SFRX shares when treasure hits, after filtering through a number of excuses, now says here for the “comedy”

• Thinks Micah being found guilty by a jury on 19 counts of fraud is just part of doing business and not a big deal, "he was just found liable, not guilty!" LOL!

• Equates being reimbursed for a phone bill as the same as receiving a salary, ignores that Kyle received no salary for 12 years, now complains about his salary while overestimating it by 100%

• Brags about making money on a P&D

• Does not believe a teredo crust exist and is just ‘hype’ because they lack the experience to know about them

• Complains about everything taking too long while working behind the scenes to slow things down

• Repeats false information over and over for years. Even after being confronted with the truth.

• Presents information as negative when it's a non-issue.

The above list is not complete, but it's plenty to make a sound decision regarding investment advice.

Keep in mind, Seafarer is criticized:

When Seafarer’s own CEO is positive about the company.

When they communicate with the public and when they do not communicate with the public.

When the price goes up (“wash trading!”) and when the price goes down.

When the volume is high (“wash trading!”) and when the volume is low.

When they have a new development and when they do not have a new development.

When they do something or when they don't appear to do anything.

When they announce what they expect to happen and when they do not announce what they expect to happen.

When they communicate to the public before something happens and if they make plans to communicate to the public after something happens.

When they promote something and when they purposely don't promote something.

When they hire someone or when they fire someone.

When Kennedy takes a salary and when he does not take a salary (12 years, no salary).

When... well, I guess it could be a long list.

Eventually it will be when they do find treasure and when they don't find enough treasure.

Basically it's every single thing they, the shareholders or anyone currently or previously associated with the company do – whether good or bad.

All I know is that I would not take advice from entities that have no firsthand knowledge about the operations or understandings regarding the crew, officers, scientists or the capabilities of the SeaSearcher.

The best source of information is from the company and people who are actively engaged with the equipment, strategy and operations.

If you think you are going to get insider information on this company or that you will know when something big is about to happen because of insider buying or insider activity, you are mistaken. The people who know will not be saying. The people who say they know, do not and will not. There will not be leaks.

You see, according to non-shareholding trolls of SFRX (who did get stuck with .0002 P&D EXPL):

Seafarer is a clown show that will never get a permit,
but if they do get a permit it will only be a ‘swim’ permit and won’t allow them to dig,
but if they do get a permit to dig then they don’t have the right equipment,
but if they do have the right equipment then the site has been picked over for 30 years and there is no wreck there,
but if it hasn't actually been picked over and there is a wreck there then FBAR won’t let them bring it up,
but if FBAR does let them bring it up then they won’t be able to find the treasure because they have no experience,
but if they do have experienced military trained divers and invent a SeaSearcher that helps them find it then the SeaSearcher doesn’t really exist,
but if the SeaSearcher does exist then it doesn’t work,
but if it does work then it’s nothing special and it’s already been done before with other equipment thus it already exist,
but if does exist and it is special then it’s not needed because all the treasure that has been found so far was found without it,
but if it does make finding treasure much much easier, faster and more efficient, then there won’t be much treasure there
but if there is a lot of treasure then they won’t be able to keep it
but if they can keep it then they won’t be able to keep it very long and Spain could come take it any day,
but if they don’t come take it and it is a lot then…
well, it’s only one wreck so it’s a “sell on the news” event and they couldn’t possibly use this new technology again on another wreck over and over again and again or transfer it’s usage to another industry and most definitely there would never be a military use for it even though that’s already been mentioned but it hasn’t happened yet so that means it will never happen.

Good luck to all the shareholders of SFRX!

#tonnagenottrinkets

Correct.

I didn't bother reading his claptrap.

Adorable how he pretends to really want to discuss things that matter.

But we all know where any attempt to engage ends.

EXPL affiliate working so hard!

Still angry about his loss on the failed EXPL?

Oh, that's right, price, space and time no longer matter.

I'll stick with SFRX. 😀

Wish I got compensation to be here like the EXPL affiliates. By the hour? Flat fee? By the post?

Space obviously does not matter based on the voluminous amount of posts from the EXPL affiliate.

Surely I'm not the only one that thinks it suspicious that the most prodigious poster on this board (by far) is an EXPL affiliate who does not own shares of SFRX.