Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
According to someone on another board, they contacted Kay about how pissed they were at the recent share price (the recent drop). Supposedly Kay said ZRFY will have info out this coming Tuesday.
Please everyone here I'm not defending anyone or this company, but as for the recent price drop - it only took a couple of million shares to drop it down to the low and it has bounced (not saying I liked it because I still don't). It really wasn't that many shares that dropped it. Could happen again! I looked at Zoom (ZM) today...I noticed that its 52 week high was $375 and today it is around $110. If some held, that is a kick in the gut with that company. Again, not defending, but there will be huge rollercoaster rides (especially with long holders vs traders). As with Zoom - they aren't going anywhere...as with SFOR/ZRFY...they aren't going anywhere either (the company has survived this long and will continue to do so - even if it is on the shoulders of the long holder's back). All in my opinion and GLTA.
Correction: oodles OF shares...
Bottom line: 100 million shares dilution, in what smells like a modified Ponzi scheme. Flush investors loan Kay money, and get oodles if shares. Kay gets money, and the lenders get back more than they loaned. Existing shareholders or new buyers get seriously diluted, and lose money. Call it whatever you want. Where is the news of any revenue?
Those are the 50 million shares that were supposed to sell for .05, replacing the deal where 50 million were sold for .02, which replaced the deal where they previously were supposed to sell for .05. Now it looks like they can just sell them for whatever they can get? But not sure on that point.
(Someone needs to tell iHub to post SFOR news under symbol ZRFY.)
Agree, particularly on something as visible as on-line meetings.
Any CTO/CIO who rolls out Zerify instead of Zoom/Teams/Google Meet, etc. is setting him/herself up for potential embarrassment should there be the slightest glitch during a presentation.
"What clown chose this platform for our meetings????"
And even IF it works... no CFO or CTO/CIO or VP of IT, is going to stick their neck out on a company that could be out of business before the ink dries.
And still no shareholders Class action?
What is the problem
Now only do they not know how to do it, they have little motivation to do it. They've been sitting back sucking down their 6 figure salaries for 20 years and what have they produced? Answer: A "one syllable" company name?
This company continues to exist to put money in Kay & Company's pockets. Anything else is just a distraction to keep stuckholders from realizing this.
Plus as I have stated, major corporations are already using or upgrading them to cover all corporate communications.
Not just video conferencing.
I have two connections in the NYC corporate IT world who make legit mid to high six figures that I get information from.
One is the VP of compliance and the other is a VP of IT.
They both state that even if the product works, it is too limited.
Having a couple of million dollars is not going to make inroads into the big guys. They need a couple of big, recognizable companies, to endorse the product. JMO, none of the 3 managers know how to do it.
It may be the best, but what good is being the best, if no one knows or uses it.
Some will certainly agree with you (and I'm not here to argue), but I guess it comes down to each person if they believe ZRFY has a viable product that can compete or not. I'm giving them until 2nd quarter next year to show real shareholder value (and you know how long I've been trading SFOR/you have been here longer than most too)....I'll be done and won't look back if they can't and don't deliver by then. If they can get a fraction of Zoom, Microsoft, etc. business - maybe we can see this above 10 cents on a consistent basis. For now, we are all waiting on ZRFY mgmt to make that happen. Some will say they won't, but one thing is for sure - it is a hill to climb when you compete against notable names that are well funded.
Zerify Inc. is too late to the party.
The following may be true, but large corporations already are integrating zero-trust architecture system wide to protect all endpoints.
Not just video conferencing.
Just think. You have a secure video conference. Then an employee sends an email that gets intercepted.
"Zerify Meet is the industry’s only video conferencing platform built with a zero-trust architecture to keep your meetings secure, private and business compliant.
And finally, it appears Microsoft is the biggest player in Zero Trust.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/zero-trust
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/find-a-partner
I don't think that even Kay is that dumb. The crap that comes out of his mouth is just to keep the money train running; it has nothing to do with the true prospects of the company which are, by any measure, dim.
As soon as investors stop throwing money into this pit, the game is over and Kay's paychecks cease. The company exists purely to keep those checks coming.
It's comical... these clowns, with their investors, think they invented the PBJ!
Typical SFOR... years and years late to the party.
If one does a side by side comparison, all the new - 1 does is allow shares to be registered under ZRFY so Selling Shareholders The Special Equities Opportunity Fund, LLC and Gregory Castaldo can convert the warrants and sell 50 million shares.
And yes, I believe the warrant money will wind up in Kay and his band's pockets.
As for any PR or podcast it will be more lies.
Also note that they need to file their Q on the 15th.
As for an honest PR????
Our Zerify API is the only API on the market that we are aware of that enables businesses to layer the appropriate levels of cyber security controls to keep data safe while meeting regulatory compliance,” says Kay.
What’s the most secure video conferencing app?
The three most secure video conferencing platforms are Livestorm, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Livestorm is the best video conferencing software for its versatility, ease of use, and superb engagement features, while Google Teams is a good option for small teams with simple needs, and Microsoft Teams is good for its integration with other Microsoft tools, like Outlook.
https://livestorm.co/blog/most-secure-video-conferencing-software
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/strikeforce-technologies-pk-SFOR/stock-news/84339449/emerging-growth-conference-scheduled-for-february
How you been Penny? Yes, SOS here!
On one board, one person is saying that it was a required filing and nothing has really changed other than from a company name change standpoint (Strikeforce to Zerify). Rumor has it we will be hearing from ZRFY management this coming week...not sure if it will be a PR, podcast, etc.
We are not selling any securities under this prospectus and will not receive any of the proceeds from the resale of shares of our common stock by the Selling Stockholders under this Prospectus, however, in conjunction with the common stock purchase warrants we have issued to each of the Selling Stockholders, we would receive an aggregate of $2,500,000 from The Special Equities Opportunity Fund, LLC and Gregory Castaldo, respectively of all common stock purchase warrants held by these Selling Stockholders were converted.
a) More dilution.
b) Any cash coming to the company will quickly go out the door to pay ridiculously high salaries and other fixed expenses.
The company is a money pit.
My first take is it involves a Warrant Purchase Agreement more so than IPO as ZRFY instead of SFOR). Probably loading more shares on shareholders back for money for ZRFY to spend...still going to look at it more. Any other insights by anyone? Thanks in advance!
ZRFY just came out with a SEC FORM S-1. Haven't scoped it out fully but often they are used for IPO purposes.
It’s time for a move from this management. Either solid news of a revenue-producing contract, or that they are BUYING NOT GIFTING THEMSELVES a substantial amount of common shares, or that the top 3 are waiving their salaries until such time as revenues justify them. Pick one, any one, otherwise might as well disconnect the life support.
Good luck with that.
So we just changed the name from dog shit to cow shit? Where is the pump? Where is the run? We need multi dollars now!
Like clockwork every quarter.
14 days until they file for an extension.
August 22, the comical financials will be out!
I just want my fucking money back from this piece of shit scam
Putting lipstick on a pig does not change it!
Please share what ever it is that you are taking!
Stock symbol change... that's what was missing. Now they'll start making money!!!
NOT!!!
Stock symbol change... that's what was missing. Now they'll start making money!!!
NOT!!!
Can get we get this to $5/pps end of week please .
I know, but just do it!
$SFOR Zerify Commences Trading Under New Stock Symbol $ZRFY
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/08/01/2489492/0/en/Zerify-Commences-Trading-Under-New-Stock-Symbol-ZRFY.html
EDISON, N.J., Aug. 01, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Zerify, Inc. (OCTQB: ZRFY, formerly “SFOR”) (“Zerify” or the “Company”), the 21-year-old cyber security company formerly known as StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. that is focused on secure video conferencing solutions, today announces that it will begin trading under the new stock symbol “ZRFY” at the start of trading on Monday, August 1, 2022. Additionally, the corporate name change from StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. to Zerify, Inc. has also been approved by FINRA.
“The corporate name change and new stock symbol, ZRFY, reflects our recent switch in focus and strategy of providing secure video conferencing solutions based on our Zero-Trust architecture. There are millions of users across the world that are unwittingly exposing themselves and their businesses to security breaches. Given our two decades of cyber security innovation and experience, we now provide our own secure video conferencing platform solution, as well as security solutions that overlay onto other commonly used video conferencing platforms, such as Zoom and MS Teams,” said Mark Kay, Zerify’s Chairman and CEO.
$ZRFY: Competitor to Zoom Technologies
Sucky looking Share Structure so far on OTC markets
https://www.zerify.com/
https://twitter.com/strikeforcetech
GO $ZRFY
Yes, so remember to replace Canceled GTC orders, should one wish to do so...
StrikeForce Technologies Inc., SFOR, changed to Zerify Inc., ZRFY:
https://otce.finra.org/otce/dailyList?viewType=Symbol%2FName%20Changes
Not until they either prove major revenue or announce that the top 3 execs are suspending their salaries until revenues exceed them significantly.
Not a chance... lucky not to drop below $.02
U think we will see near .10
Wait until Q2 financials come out...
They must have been updating earlier. Thanks.
This has to be the funniest comment from Kay:
“We have a truly unique story that we feel will continue to be well received as we continue on our growth trajectory.”
"Unique story"... 21 years of failure to make a penny
"Growth trajectory"... only thing growing is the three amigos bank account
Not sure what you're experiencing... It's working for me.
I wonder when they will update the IR website as it is down.
StrikeForce Technologies
This information found below is from different Mods. It can not be removed without their permission. Any additions must go below the last entry.
WARNING: PLEASE USE THE SYMBOL SFOR OR COMPANY NAME WHEN POSTING-USE OF ABBREVIATIONS SUCH AS "SF" WILL BE DELETED!
This board is to be used to discuss SFOR(D) the company, its officers and its stock. Messages about other posters or intentions, the mods, name calling, profanity, deletions etc. are off topic at the very least.
To answer some of your questions regarding posts, please read the following, that you should have known already, taken from the Ihub FAQ section of the Ihub handbook. So you can stop with the moronic conspiracy theories about the Mods and Admins on this board!
Regarding libel and slander suspected posts:
"Libel can only become a fact if a judge says it is. Nobody else, including Moderators or Site Admins, can nor will determine that Member posted content is libelous. Members are often of the opinion that a post is libelous, but no Moderator should act based on that opinion. Libel is decided by a judge in a court of law after conducting proper evidentiary hearings. If such a judgment is issued by a court of competent jurisdiction, iHub will abide by that ruling. Otherwise, it is not a matter that Site Admin or Mods can decide. Our only role here is to ensure adherence to the Terms of Use. Anecdotally, quite often the information that some Members allege to be libelous ends up being accurate, which is why neither Site Admins nor Moderators remove posts on the basis of being allegedly false or libelous."
Regarding posting lies (or what some posters feel are lies):
"Mods or Admin do not make decisions about the veracity of information posted. "Truth" is a very subjective term and neither Site Admin nor Mods remove posts based on judgments of this type. Each reader has both the right and obligation to decide for themselves if they feel a post is accurate and its author credible. As a participant on the board, the Moderators' recourse is the same as any other Member; to debate the information contained in the post without attacking the Member, or to ignore it. Attack the message, not the messenger."
Regarding a good DD post with a personal attack lumped in:
If a post is 99% on topic and 1% personal attack it still needs to be removed. Personal attacks in any form are disrespectful of others and are unwelcome on the site. These types of gratuitous comments also create noise and dilute the quality of the board. When a Member attacks another poster, other participants inevitably feel the need to respond, either agreeing or defending. Then others feel the need to respond to these…and so on and so on ad nauseam. Pretty soon the board has devolved into personal attacks and discussion about other Members, i.e., noise and no signal. There are plenty of other sites that allow these types of posts and it is difficult to find any meaningful content on such sites. The goal at iHub is to have all information, whether positive, neutral or negative, discussed in a civil manner, free of personal attacks.
Regarding proof of member post content:
Members do not have to provide "proof" when offering their opinions. There is no requirement for Members to substantiate their posts. Veracity of posts and credibility of the author is determined by the reader.
http://www.strikeforcetech.com/index.aspx
SFOR Security Details Outstanding Shares confirmed unchanged as of 8/19/2016
|
Market Value1 | $9,497,134 | a/o Aug 19, 2016 | |
Authorized Shares | 5,000,000,000 | a/o May 16, 2016 | |
Outstanding Shares | 2,282,964,907 | a/o May 16, 2016 | |
-Restricted | Not Available | ||
-Unrestricted | Not Available | ||
Held at DTC | Not Available | ||
Float | 2,282,934,907 | a/o May 16, 2016 |
Leadership Team:
http://www.guardedid.com/about_leadership.aspx
Advisory Board:
http://www.guardedid.com/about_advisory.aspx
StrikeForce Technologies' IR Contact
Mark L. Kay
CEO
(732) 661-9641
marklkay@strikeforcetech.com
NOW SOLD IN TARGET
http://www.target.com/p/mobile-trust-keystroke-encryption-software-2-mobile-devices/-/A-50575250#prodSlot=medium_1_1&term=mobiletrust
http://www.target.com/p/guarded-id-21-keystroke-encryption-software-2-pcs/-/A-50568581#prodSlot=medium_1_1&term=guarded+id
http://anti-keylogger-software-review.toptenreviews.com/?full_site=true
StrikeForce Technologies is a leading provider that Specializes in Identity Theft Online solutions for consumers, industry and government. By leveraging StrikeForce's breakthrough technologies, consumers and organizations can finally secure their electronic assets while protecting their employees, business partners, suppliers and customers from malicious hacking and theft.
StrikeForce's revolutionary technologies are represented by a proprietary software product suite that guards both businesses and consumers from keylogging, phishing, malware, spyware and other identity attacks and scams.
For more on StrikeForce Technologies, see our corporate web site.
RECENT CYBER BREACHES ALL POSITIVE FOR SFOR (Thanks TradeSlinger)
The threat from cybercrime? 'You ain't seen nothing yet"
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100959481
August 29,2013
Telecoms companies now subject to new personal data breach notification rules
http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/august/telecoms-companies-now-subject-to-new-personal-data-breach-notification-rules/
August 28, 2013
Phishing email grants hackers access to DNS records of major websites
http://www.scmagazine.com//phishing-email-grants-hackers-access-to-dns-records-of-major-websites/article/309274/#
August 2013 CyberBreaches...
Infosec 2013: Cost of cyber breaches rises three-fold, research shows
http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240182218/Infosec-2013-Cost-of-cyber-breaches-rises-three-fold-research-shows
C/Net News:League of Legends is hacked,
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57599450-83/league-of-legends-is-hacked-with-crucial-user-info-accessed/
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57599646-83/cybercrooks-use-ddos-attacks-to-mask-theft-of-banks-millions/
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57600336-83/syrian-electronic-army-implicated-in-twitter-new-york-times-attacks/
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57598603-83/google-confirms-android-flaw-that-led-to-bitcoin-theft/
Nasdaq outage resembles hacker attacks
http://www.usatoday.com/story/cybertruth/2013/08/22/nasdaq-outage-aligns-with--denial-of-service-attacks/2687323/
August 2013 global threats
http://www.scmagazine.com//august-2013-global-threats/slideshow/1502/#0
LivingSocial
http://www.scmagazine.com/top-five-data-breaches-in-2013so-far/slideshow/1387/
Daily-deal website LivingSocial confirmed that its computer systems were hacked, resulting in “unauthorized access.”
The company updated its password encryption method after the breach impacted more than 50 million users. Names, email addresses, dates of birth, and salted passwords were stolen.
1-15 June 2013 Cyber Attacks Timeline
http://hackmageddon.com/2013/07/01/1-15-june-2013-cyber-attacks-timeline/
http://www.strikeforcetech.com |
IDGenie Mobile Security
|
|
OTCQB (as if that means anything)
SFOR now on OTCQB Benefits of uplisting to OTCQB per OTCMarkets website as follows:
"The OTCQB is considered by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an "established public market" for the purpose of determining the public market price when registering securities for resale with the SEC. The OTC Pink is not considered as such and most broker dealers will not trade or recommend OTC Pink stocks. Because the OTCQB dramatically increases transparency, reporting standards, management certification and compliance requirements, the majority of broker dealers trade stocks on the OTCQB. Historically this has resulted in greater liquidity and awareness for companies that reach the OTCQB tier.
Key elements and benefits of uplisting to the OTCQB include:
?Companies must remain current and compliant in their reporting to the SEC
?Minimum bid price test of $0.01 removes companies that are most likely to be the subject of dilutive stock fraud schemes and promotion
?Improved investor confidence through verified information, confirming that the Company Profile displayed on www.otcmarkets.com is current and complete
?Annual management certification process to verify officers, directors, controlling shareholders, and shares outstanding
?Greater information availability for investors through the OTC Disclosure & News Service
?Transparent prices for investors through full-depth of book with Real Time Level 2 quotes"
NEXT QUARTER
500 to 1 Reverse Split Coming, end of April, 2020
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=14077781&guid=v5zHUFJLzJ56Ayh
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |