Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SFOR/Zerify dealing with PushForce, PushForce dealing with Snap-on Business Services, Snap-on Business Services dealing with Ford, Nissan, John Deere, and many other well known names. Also smaller names too.
Google "Most secure video conferencing" and "End to End Encrypted Video Conferencing."
There are several... several offerings out there. As usual, SFOR is late to the game.
Your posting an Ad from LiveStream. You be the judge
Is Kay spreading lies again?
Our Zerify API is the only API on the market that we are aware of that enables businesses to layer the appropriate levels of cyber security controls to keep data safe while meeting regulatory compliance,” says Kay.
What’s the most secure video conferencing app?
The three most secure video conferencing platforms are Livestorm, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Livestorm is the best video conferencing software for its versatility, ease of use, and superb engagement features, while Google Teams is a good option for small teams with simple needs, and Microsoft Teams is good for its integration with other Microsoft tools, like Outlook.
https://livestorm.co/blog/most-secure-video-conferencing-software
Not necessarily competing directly with them. Think of the Zerify API as a Plug-In to Improve the security features of those popular platforms. One can envision the
the Big Boys Licensing the Tech from Zerify!
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/06/20/2465332/0/en/PushForce-Licenses-Zerify-s-API-Launches-First-Customer.html
So correct me if I am wrong, Kay is competing with Livestorm, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams?
https://livestorm.co/blog/most-secure-video-conferencing-software
Consider this 20 years of lies
CONSIDER THIS:
Regardless of Kay & Co.'s past failures, in 2022 SafeVChat has now been vetted and endorsed by two highly influencial industry consulting
firms whose clients include some of the largest companies in he world.
To think that these endorsements are meaningless is fool-hardy.
Back in 1980 there was a struggling penny-ante, one trick pony outfit with a single product called MS-Dos. One day that product was implemented by just ONE (1) Company, IBM. All it took was 1 Company. That struggling one trick pony outfit is now the largest Software Company on earth.
Now, with these two endorsements, is it reasonable to think at least one major
outfit will implement the product? You be the Judge. It's your Money.
YOU chose the new name, DIDN’T YOU!?!
Was expecting a sell off at the end today, but more than a paint job brought it up some. API news could be sitting right there for us Tuesday morning (market is closed on Monday).
So what has happened to this POS??
BAWHAHAHA
Proxy Statement is out... oh wait, doesn't impact shareholders as your vote doesn't count.
Markets closed Monday...will the PR come out Tuesday morning?
Like the 3000 share buy for $67.50 to paint it green after a 425,000 dump!
The stock has been a joke for 20 years
June 14 news was a joke. What good was the name change?
Or maybe...LOLS
Good one!!!
EFFT
SCAM
So what is more comical? The latest news or Kay's next quarter statements?
Suggestion for a new symbol : FKKD
They will get $$$$ to pump it up,soon or late.
Tough to pump Zero-Trust co. that name sends up red flags on first impression. What they thinking. "Zerify' . Everything about Zero
means less. not more . Needs another Image Enhancer urgently..
$SFOR , #zero.. imo
Oh look... another new pumper has joined!!!!
How much is Kay paying you?
Yes, it will be coming Tortiello, patience is the key!
Only close 36.1% down. Not too shabby! LOL
Your statement is no quaranteed.
All I care is how many shares I'm will be able to hold!
I don't care how low it's going to go!
Buy! Buy ! It will fly soon!!
Wait and see for 20 years
Just for kicks... I'll put $100 in when it hits $.001
Wonder how long I'll have to wait for that.
Just wait and see I did the same thing with aabb rgbp, sfor, intv, Asti nwgc and other securities
I guess no 1000% move in one day
It will come, patience$$$$$
What happened to your parabolic move
Not invested here haven’t been since the last r/s but still hold 500 shares since the last r/s
Idiots like you they think that they will never lose, it’s painful to be down more than 30 % for now, considering than more than one time I enjoined + 1000 with sfor
Some people never learn,and should not be allowed to invest. Idiots you deserve to lose everything have no sympathy for any of ya.
And they should have either made clear the ticker would not change, or said what it would change to.
They really should have paired that announcement with some good news regarding revenues, and waited on changing the company name and announcing the narrowing of its focus until they had great news about revenues.
Sadly I added also
Correction... down 32%
T I M B E R!!!!!
down 32.88% on TD
And now it's there... down 29%!!!!!
StrikeForce Technologies
This information found below is from different Mods. It can not be removed without their permission. Any additions must go below the last entry.
WARNING: PLEASE USE THE SYMBOL SFOR OR COMPANY NAME WHEN POSTING-USE OF ABBREVIATIONS SUCH AS "SF" WILL BE DELETED!
This board is to be used to discuss SFOR(D) the company, its officers and its stock. Messages about other posters or intentions, the mods, name calling, profanity, deletions etc. are off topic at the very least.
To answer some of your questions regarding posts, please read the following, that you should have known already, taken from the Ihub FAQ section of the Ihub handbook. So you can stop with the moronic conspiracy theories about the Mods and Admins on this board!
Regarding libel and slander suspected posts:
"Libel can only become a fact if a judge says it is. Nobody else, including Moderators or Site Admins, can nor will determine that Member posted content is libelous. Members are often of the opinion that a post is libelous, but no Moderator should act based on that opinion. Libel is decided by a judge in a court of law after conducting proper evidentiary hearings. If such a judgment is issued by a court of competent jurisdiction, iHub will abide by that ruling. Otherwise, it is not a matter that Site Admin or Mods can decide. Our only role here is to ensure adherence to the Terms of Use. Anecdotally, quite often the information that some Members allege to be libelous ends up being accurate, which is why neither Site Admins nor Moderators remove posts on the basis of being allegedly false or libelous."
Regarding posting lies (or what some posters feel are lies):
"Mods or Admin do not make decisions about the veracity of information posted. "Truth" is a very subjective term and neither Site Admin nor Mods remove posts based on judgments of this type. Each reader has both the right and obligation to decide for themselves if they feel a post is accurate and its author credible. As a participant on the board, the Moderators' recourse is the same as any other Member; to debate the information contained in the post without attacking the Member, or to ignore it. Attack the message, not the messenger."
Regarding a good DD post with a personal attack lumped in:
If a post is 99% on topic and 1% personal attack it still needs to be removed. Personal attacks in any form are disrespectful of others and are unwelcome on the site. These types of gratuitous comments also create noise and dilute the quality of the board. When a Member attacks another poster, other participants inevitably feel the need to respond, either agreeing or defending. Then others feel the need to respond to these…and so on and so on ad nauseam. Pretty soon the board has devolved into personal attacks and discussion about other Members, i.e., noise and no signal. There are plenty of other sites that allow these types of posts and it is difficult to find any meaningful content on such sites. The goal at iHub is to have all information, whether positive, neutral or negative, discussed in a civil manner, free of personal attacks.
Regarding proof of member post content:
Members do not have to provide "proof" when offering their opinions. There is no requirement for Members to substantiate their posts. Veracity of posts and credibility of the author is determined by the reader.
http://www.strikeforcetech.com/index.aspx
SFOR Security Details Outstanding Shares confirmed unchanged as of 8/19/2016
|
Market Value1 | $9,497,134 | a/o Aug 19, 2016 | |
Authorized Shares | 5,000,000,000 | a/o May 16, 2016 | |
Outstanding Shares | 2,282,964,907 | a/o May 16, 2016 | |
-Restricted | Not Available | ||
-Unrestricted | Not Available | ||
Held at DTC | Not Available | ||
Float | 2,282,934,907 | a/o May 16, 2016 |
Leadership Team:
http://www.guardedid.com/about_leadership.aspx
Advisory Board:
http://www.guardedid.com/about_advisory.aspx
StrikeForce Technologies' IR Contact
Mark L. Kay
CEO
(732) 661-9641
marklkay@strikeforcetech.com
NOW SOLD IN TARGET
http://www.target.com/p/mobile-trust-keystroke-encryption-software-2-mobile-devices/-/A-50575250#prodSlot=medium_1_1&term=mobiletrust
http://www.target.com/p/guarded-id-21-keystroke-encryption-software-2-pcs/-/A-50568581#prodSlot=medium_1_1&term=guarded+id
http://anti-keylogger-software-review.toptenreviews.com/?full_site=true
StrikeForce Technologies is a leading provider that Specializes in Identity Theft Online solutions for consumers, industry and government. By leveraging StrikeForce's breakthrough technologies, consumers and organizations can finally secure their electronic assets while protecting their employees, business partners, suppliers and customers from malicious hacking and theft.
StrikeForce's revolutionary technologies are represented by a proprietary software product suite that guards both businesses and consumers from keylogging, phishing, malware, spyware and other identity attacks and scams.
For more on StrikeForce Technologies, see our corporate web site.
RECENT CYBER BREACHES ALL POSITIVE FOR SFOR (Thanks TradeSlinger)
The threat from cybercrime? 'You ain't seen nothing yet"
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100959481
August 29,2013
Telecoms companies now subject to new personal data breach notification rules
http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/august/telecoms-companies-now-subject-to-new-personal-data-breach-notification-rules/
August 28, 2013
Phishing email grants hackers access to DNS records of major websites
http://www.scmagazine.com//phishing-email-grants-hackers-access-to-dns-records-of-major-websites/article/309274/#
August 2013 CyberBreaches...
Infosec 2013: Cost of cyber breaches rises three-fold, research shows
http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240182218/Infosec-2013-Cost-of-cyber-breaches-rises-three-fold-research-shows
C/Net News:League of Legends is hacked,
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57599450-83/league-of-legends-is-hacked-with-crucial-user-info-accessed/
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57599646-83/cybercrooks-use-ddos-attacks-to-mask-theft-of-banks-millions/
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57600336-83/syrian-electronic-army-implicated-in-twitter-new-york-times-attacks/
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57598603-83/google-confirms-android-flaw-that-led-to-bitcoin-theft/
Nasdaq outage resembles hacker attacks
http://www.usatoday.com/story/cybertruth/2013/08/22/nasdaq-outage-aligns-with--denial-of-service-attacks/2687323/
August 2013 global threats
http://www.scmagazine.com//august-2013-global-threats/slideshow/1502/#0
LivingSocial
http://www.scmagazine.com/top-five-data-breaches-in-2013so-far/slideshow/1387/
Daily-deal website LivingSocial confirmed that its computer systems were hacked, resulting in “unauthorized access.”
The company updated its password encryption method after the breach impacted more than 50 million users. Names, email addresses, dates of birth, and salted passwords were stolen.
1-15 June 2013 Cyber Attacks Timeline
http://hackmageddon.com/2013/07/01/1-15-june-2013-cyber-attacks-timeline/
http://www.strikeforcetech.com |
IDGenie Mobile Security
|
|
OTCQB (as if that means anything)
SFOR now on OTCQB Benefits of uplisting to OTCQB per OTCMarkets website as follows:
"The OTCQB is considered by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an "established public market" for the purpose of determining the public market price when registering securities for resale with the SEC. The OTC Pink is not considered as such and most broker dealers will not trade or recommend OTC Pink stocks. Because the OTCQB dramatically increases transparency, reporting standards, management certification and compliance requirements, the majority of broker dealers trade stocks on the OTCQB. Historically this has resulted in greater liquidity and awareness for companies that reach the OTCQB tier.
Key elements and benefits of uplisting to the OTCQB include:
?Companies must remain current and compliant in their reporting to the SEC
?Minimum bid price test of $0.01 removes companies that are most likely to be the subject of dilutive stock fraud schemes and promotion
?Improved investor confidence through verified information, confirming that the Company Profile displayed on www.otcmarkets.com is current and complete
?Annual management certification process to verify officers, directors, controlling shareholders, and shares outstanding
?Greater information availability for investors through the OTC Disclosure & News Service
?Transparent prices for investors through full-depth of book with Real Time Level 2 quotes"
NEXT QUARTER
500 to 1 Reverse Split Coming, end of April, 2020
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=14077781&guid=v5zHUFJLzJ56Ayh
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |