Where the PCBM Stuckholders now reside

[Super2013]

revoked stocks cant stay dead forever

[Super2013]

this board is buzzin on raging bull

[Super2013]

good luck

[Super2013]

Is it dead

[Stock]

Yet another board to shunt to the Talk category to prevent future wipe by an Admin.

Or at least REMOVE THE TICKER.

[Stock]

SECURITY DELETIONS

Dl Date Symbol Company Name Effective Date/Comments
7/7/2004 SRCI Serac Holdings, Inc. Common Stock 7/7/2004 12(j) Registration Revoked by SEC **

http://www.otcbb.com/asp/dailylist_search.asp?DirectSymbol=SRCI&OTCBB=ALL

[puckhead]

Is SRCI Dead

[lifegear]

whatever happened to PCBM SRCI??? did they revive it in another shell or the company just gave up??

[Billybob_TX]

For those that miss Surfit's drug/viagra/too-much-sugar-addled rants, here he is: http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/memalias.cgi?board=all&member=lighting_truth_up

[Susie924]

Rest?

That word doesn't exist for you anymore Boris!!!!

I'm glad everyone is doing well!

[fung_derf]

Is this the fishing board?

[Dancing in the dark]

8 lbs 5 ounces 21.5 inches
everybody is doing well.
everybody is tired.
i can't wait to go back to work to get some rest! 8)~

[fung_derf]

Is her middle name Dark or Hire?

edit: at the very least you could have named her Vincea or somesuch.

[Susie924]

I happened to find this by accident!!!! I was looking to see when you last posted and there it was!!!!

Congratulations Daddy!!!!

How big was she???
How is Mommy and baby doing????
Have you been able to stop smiling yet????

So many questions!!!!!

I am going to post this on the PCBM board!!

[Dancing in the dark]

sophia born june 26th 9:30p via caesarian after 36 hours of labor. *smile*

[fung_derf]

BEDROCK SHAREHOLDERS:

Scott Crane and Robert Siegel together owners of 394 shares of Bedrock Holdings
(197 each) shall together receive Sixty Seven Million Five Hundred Thousand
(67,500,000) shares of Capital Solutions I, Inc.

Scott Crane and Robert Siegel direct their shares of Capital Solutions I, Inc.
be issued as follows:

Federal One, Inc. - 20,000,000 shares;
North American Capital - 25,000,000 shares; and
Nothing Personal Just Business, Inc. - 22,500,000 shares;

Serac Holdings, Inc., the owner of 206 shares of Bedrock Holdings shall receive
a total of One Hundred and Twenty Five Million (125,000,000) shares of Capital
Solutions I, Inc. and hereby direct that its shares be issued in the name of
Serac Holdings, Inc.

[ProfitChaser]

Does anyone know if there is a way to get these SRCI shares out of my account. I am tired of looking at them. They show up in my account but when I try to sell them at market or any other price it says no way hosia. LOL

[jmrsage]

Am I missing something here? What are these people waiting for?

By: wondrwen1951
15 Feb 2005, 09:31 PM EST
Msg. 1157534 of 1157690
(This msg. is a reply to 1157530 by ezaltheladiespa.)
Jump to msg. #
Thank you for your great messages! I am still long SRCI, all certed and waiting for something good to happen and for the bashers to get their just due finally!Wendy


http://www.ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=SRCI&read=1157534

[Dancing in the dark]

what was it the capitol of?
(sorry i couldn't resist)

[sydog1]

Has anyone reported SRCI as a capitol loss?

[fung_derf]

Nevermind. It would just give me a headache. It's enough to know that someone even tries.

[pcjockey]

To a point.

[fung_derf]

And that's what makes him so special to all of us. How about guru. Any ideas?

[pcjockey]

I have no idea what he is saying.

[fung_derf]

You mean you're not living through miltie?

[pcjockey]

BnB.. with the exception of the occasional RB and Red Sox fan forum post, I mostly lurk these days. Time slots don't exist the way they used to a couple years ago.

And I pretty much never check RB on weekends.

[fung_derf]

Interesting. Although both work for me, and I still don't get the difference, but that's ok. Perhaps I should sponsor their race team?

[BullNBear52]

I rarely get over to RB anymore since the demise of PCBM. You must visit more often.

[occams_razor]

I'll give you an example.

This URL is one obtained clicking on a Google image search object. It will work in ihub as long as I don't preview and edit the post.

[edit] doesn't work. See what I mean? here is a perfect demonstration on the usefulness of tinyurl.

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://user.txcyber.c
om/~james/AR/derf.gif&imgrefurl=http://user.txcyber.com/~jam
es/AR/team_derf.htm&h=210&w=401&sz=5&tbnid=mE04WrwAJesJ:&tbn
h=61&tbnw=118&start=14&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dderf%26hl%3Den%26l
r%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DG

here is the tinyurl redirect. Points at the same page. This will post on most websites and will work here after a preview and edit where the giant link above will get chopped.


http://tinyurl.com/658pw

original link

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://user.txcyber.com/~james/AR/derf.gif&imgrefurl=http....



I edited the message. Look what happened to the link

[occams_razor]

depends on the website you post it on. Sometimes the link stops becoming a link and is just ordinary text after the first line feed.

It also gets around the preview and edit truncation that happens with long links on ihub. Like any other good idea, it took little time to be misused.

[pcjockey]

BnB... if a link breaks, well sometimes it breaks... if you get my drift.

[pcjockey]

hullo BnB52

[fung_derf]

LOL! Yeah, that explains it to me! Is that like a time warp?

[BullNBear52]

Yes but doesn't the link still work? I don't use tinyurls and it seems that my links though long still are clickable.

[occams_razor]

It was intended to allow really long URL's to post without getting truncated by text wrap.

[fung_derf]

I don't understand the benefit to tinyurl?

[BullNBear52]

Well hello stranger.

[pcjockey]

I think u r correct re: blocking tinyurl. Haven't seen them work for a while now. Not surprising but annoying as all get out.

[occams_razor]

really? I wonder if they are blocking tinyurl. If so, it's a good idea, tinyurl can cloak some really nasty things.

Try posting your info with the actual URL substituted for the tinyurl redirection link.

[fung_derf]

No need to apologize. Just don't use the word "ilk" in any of your posts.

[pcjockey]

Sorry, RB wouldn't let me post that info and I saw this board had kind of dried up.

[fung_derf]

Odd place to use for storage? I guess it's not being used for much else?

[pcjockey]

Mark, a few random thoughts:

ME or XP?

How to troubleshoot CD-ROM drive problems in Windows XP

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;314096


List of CD drive troubleshooting articles:

http://tinyurl.com/5xdj7


Some viruses can disable floppy drives, Michaelangelo for one.

Mobo issue maybe? Faulty hardware? I'd consider transferring
all over to CD and dump the floppy anyway.


Might see if a pcpitstop scan can help locate the problem:

http://www.pcpitstop.com/

[500_and_Long]

LOL

[fung_derf]

You hold them both?? Do you also have CMKX? ECNC? WAVX?

[joe758]

I HOLD PCBM AND SRCI STOCK AND WILL HOLD A BUNCH OF NOTHING TILL SOMETHING COMES AROUND THATS Y I GOT INTO THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE

[Susie924]

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/34-49971.htm

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 49971 / July 6, 2004
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-11535

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the Matter of

PINNACLE BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, INC.

Respondent.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC PROCEEDINGS, MAKING FINDINGS, AND REVOKING REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(j) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors that proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), against Pinnacle Business Management, Inc. ("Pinnacle" or "Respondent").

II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer of Settlement (the "Offer") which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission's jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these proceedings, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Public Proceedings, Making Findings, and Revoking Registration of Securities Pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Order"), as set forth below.

III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent's Offer, the Commission finds that:

A. Pinnacle (d/b/a "Serac Holdings") is a Carson City, Nevada holding company that was incorporated in 1997. Pinnacle acquired a public shell company in a reverse merger in March 2000, and traded on the OTC Bulletin Board until December 2000, when it was delisted. Since that time, it has been quoted on the "Pink Sheets" under the ticker symbol "PCBM." The common and preferred stock of Pinnacle have been registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.

B. Pinnacle has failed to comply with Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder, while its common stock was registered with the Commission. Pinnacle has not filed an Annual Report on Form 10-K since April 17, 2001, when it filed its annual report for the year ended December 31, 2000. Pinnacle has not filed any quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for any fiscal period subsequent to its fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2001.

C. Pinnacle's last filing of record with the Commission is a Form 8-K dated August 4, 2003. In this Form 8-K, Pinnacle announced that two officers had resigned and that the company had one remaining officer and director. This Form 8-K also disclosed "the company has no assets, no operating business and no sources of revenue."

D. On May 8, 2002, the Commission filed a civil action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, alleging that on April 2, 2002, Pinnacle issued a false and misleading press release regarding a proposed spin-off of a Pinnacle subsidiary known as All Pro. In the press release, Pinnacle stated that after the spin-off to Pinnacle shareholders, All Pro would seek a listing on the American Stock Exchange and that its initial trading price would be $4.00 per share. The Commission's complaint alleged that Pinnacle lacked a reasonable basis for these statements. On December 15, 2003, the Court for the Middle District of Florida entered an order permanently enjoining Pinnacle from violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. Pinnacle consented to the injunction without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's complaint. Consequently, Pinnacle failed to comply with Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

IV.
Section 12(j) of the Exchange Act provides as follows:

The Commission is authorized, by order, as it deems necessary or appropriate for the protection of investors to deny, to suspend the effective date of, to suspend for a period not exceeding twelve months, or to revoke the registration of a security, if the Commission finds, on the record after notice and opportunity for hearing, that the issuer of such security has failed to comply with any provision of this title or the rules and regulations thereunder. No member of a national securities exchange, broker, or dealer shall make use of the mails or any means of instrumentality of interstate commerce to effect any transaction in, or to induce the purchase or sale of, any security the registration of which has been and is suspended or revoked pursuant to the preceding sentence.

In view of the foregoing, the Commission finds that it is necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to impose the sanction specified in Respondent's Offer.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Exchange Act, that registration of each class of Respondent's securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act be, and hereby is, revoked.

By the Commission.

Jonathan G. Katz
Secretary

[QBIDDOLLAR]

SRCI IS DONE....I just got a call from the trading desk that the FCC has removed SRCI from trading thru a 12J registration...whatever that is! I was told to get a no value letter and claim the loss.

SRCI IS NO MORE.

[fung_derf]

Sure. The charts have no emotion. The only problem is, sometimes at these low prices, an order slips through with not enough zero's. So it screws up the charts.
I remember years ago when I predicted based on the charts that PCBM would dip to .02. Some guy wanted to bet me that would never happen! Of course, his alias vanished shortly after......Ahhhhhhh, the good ol' days!

[rickguy6]

derf...do you think technical analysis applies with scam stocks? It's hard to believe it does and probably even harder to try to figure out HOW it does.