VirExit Technologies Inc (VXIT)

[stock king 1]

Good luck .

[stock king 1]

So what your saying , is jk a crook .

[m$teamworkotc]

001 wall and our RESIDENT bidwhacker strikes again....
bigg pos

[Puma31]

100%

[m$teamworkotc]

drama bash queen?

[FatCatFenix]

You two idiots post more often and earliest than those who actually have shares here.
VXIT is … 🎼 always on your mind! 🤣

Those who know the least make the loudest noise.

Tell me you’re married to a stock without telling me you’re married to a stock.

https://tenor.com/en-CA/view/ross-ross-geller-sign-language-action-hands-poker-face-gif-16666199.

[Edward]

You're wrong again, but we're used to it.

you post so many lies & foolish assumptions here it brings me out of my shell.

Right on target. You are correct. Applies to 3 or four.

Those who know the least make the loudest noise.

Truth is:

VXIT is a SCAM, run by a low life CEO:

This is who shareholders of VXIT CEO James Katzaroff are dealing with:

http://www.clippercorporatepartners.com/2019/02/vivos-slays-dragon-initially-posted.html

(former company he was the CEO with.)

"Unfortunately, the company's future had been mortgaged through toxic debt. The toxic debt was piled onto the company by former CEO, James Katzaroff, almost exclusively to pay the salaries of his wife and himself, as well as take a bunch of pointless and expensive trips to places like Russia, albeit purportedly for the company's benefit, but to no avail. The Katzaroffs had taken as much as a million dollars out of Vivos over the final few years of Jim's tenure as CEO.

Under Jim Katzaroff, the company made very little progress while having its viability placed into jeopardy, all in the name of a paycheck. Katzaroff could have raised money under more responsible terms, but taking on toxic debt was easier and the simpler route to ensure he and his wife got paid. Toxic borrowing is almost always for the benefit of management, so that they are ensured that their pockets are lined--under the guise of salary and usually for doing nothing--without regard to the retail shareholder.

In short, Katzaroff was in breach of his fiduciary duties to Vivos"

[price_and_volume]

You're wrong again, but we're used to it.

You forgot you love drama that’s why you post here EVERY SINGLE DAY!

I much prefer comedy over drama but you post so many lies & foolish assumptions here it brings me out of my shell.

I typically post in reply to those lies, BS and other nonsense that is designed to separate the weak from their hard-earned money.

I think its best for everyone to have a balanced view of $VXIT, both the scammy pump-side of the coin, and the truth.

Broken clocks occasionally indicate the time and I acknowledge any OTC can run any time, so maybe $VXIT will have another day in the sun.

If so, I'll attempt to get a piece of the action, and I'll read your posts at the top AGAIN about how much higher its going... while the smart money sells to rubes like you & kev & whoever it is you try to influence.

GLTA

[Puma31]

What’s your next troll?

[price_and_volume]

So much insight. What's your next pick?

I'm sure it'll be another fascinating scam like your previous picks.

Here's an idea: Explain why YOU BELIEVE $VXIT isn't a shell.

Your argument last year was because they didn't tick the "shell" box on filings lol.

[Puma31]

You forgot you love drama that’s why you post here EVERY SINGLE DAY!

anyone else with your strategy would be waiting in the weeds. Yet, you’re not. Why? Becuz you love drama and bashing

[Puma31]

Preach on, brother!

He’s a clown

[price_and_volume]

Buncha clowns. Nobody's buying $VXIT.

If I wanted shares I'd have them. And if $VXIT ever makes a move, I may possibly join you for quick ride - I don't have to post lies to convince others to bid this higher - I'm patient & wait for actual moves before entering - then I trade the MOVE, not the lies.

At least you got ONE thing right: nobody on ihub is shorting sub-penny pinks.

Also nobody spreads FUD to get into a POS that can't support buying or (more importantly) selling volume.

I started posting here just over 2 yrs ago when $VXIT was trading .004ish and in a well-established downtrend FOR GOOD REASONS.

You mindless pumpers are blind to your own pathetic machinations, intentionally trying to convince others to buy and/or hold while $VXIT has continued to crater.

Those who were swayed by YOUR posts are massively underwater. Anyone swayed by mine exited much higher.

Self-reflect a bit dude.

[FatCatFenix]

Pot calling the kettle black much! Lol

You’re an idiot. Everyone here knows it.

Everyone here knows what you are… and the idiot label isn’t even half of it.

Everyone’s here to make some cash, why else would you be here…
- You’re definitely not a kind soul here to help out all the amateur traders lol!
- There’s no way you can short Vxit right now.
- Which leaves you must believe it’s going to go up sometime soon and just wanting to buy some shares for cheap by spreading FUD.

First class humain right here! Lol

[vdog1776]

You’re a liar you’re not here to discuss $VXIT if that were true, you’d say that you own some shares so how many shares do you own?

That’s when you start saying I wouldn’t own this stuff and then you’ll say you’re here to save people!! Get real

[price_and_volume]

I’m here to discuss $VXIT.

Its successes & failures.

Unfortunately there are none of the former & way too many of the latter.

Why are you here?

[m$teamworkotc]

0008 bid says it all and the many millions sold here :(

[beer$$money]

$VXIT I pointed out in my post your replying to that the last Attorney Letter that was filed by S O N F I E L D & S O N F I E L D had the exact paragraph in its Attorney Letter. That obviously was Ok with OTC Markets Shell Status requirements as that is in every Attorney Letter that is filed for all Companies without audited financial statements.

For companies without audited financial statements, an Attorney Letter Agreement must be on file with OTC Markets Group to qualify for Current Information

OTC Markets ATTORNEY LETTER AGREEMENT

Exhibit A

ATTORNEY LETTER GUIDELINES
To: Attorneys Providing Letters with Respect to Adequate Current Information

#15. Counsel must state whether or not the issuer, or its predecessors, is or ever was a “shell company” as
defined in Rules 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 and 12b-2 of the Exchange Act of 1934.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/files/Attorney_Letter_Agreement_Watermarked.pdf

[vdog1776]

If there’s nothing here then why are you here no point right?

[price_and_volume]

You’re an idiot. Everyone here knows it.

Whatever pumper clown, you pumped $KPAY & $KWBT too, before they were delisted.

Rather than argue truthful posts, you should simply give them fair consideration.

But you won’t. You can’t.

Cuz there’s something wrong w your head.

[price_and_volume]

We’ve discussed this several times.

$VXIT meets every definition of a shell. The issue is its an SEC definition & $VXIT ain’t SEC reporting, so OTCM invented their own label of ‘shell risk’.

It’s the same thing of course, and all filings since JK took over (including the latest filings) continue to make it clear that $VXIT’s a non-operational shell.

No big deal - it was the same when it ran previously.

For some reason the same ol’ pumper fools insist there’s something real here when there isn’t.

They’d be smarter to just post intelligent arguments describing how ANY OTC SCAM can run, & many do.

But to insist for the last 3 years that $VXIT is “operational” and/ or actually worth anything is silly.

[Puma31]

That’s what basher clowns do

[m$teamworkotc]

our resident seller will prob take out 0008 today as noone trusts anyone here anymore

[vdog1776]

Once that happens, he’ll disappear and never return

[m$teamworkotc]

once jk confirms sales/contracts/ etc then will you AGREE ...its not a SHELL

[price_and_volume]

“Working to get it removed” lol.

The way you do that is by NOT being a shell.

Simply claiming otherwise doesn’t make it true.

Read the mentioned rules (shell definition) and explain how $VXIT isn’t a shell.

[Puma31]

What’s a lie? Please share

OTCM has never said VXIT is a “shell” they simply flagged them as a “shell risk”. Looks like Vxit is working to get that removed


The Issuer has provided written representation that, based on personal knowledge, review of public
filings and review of the Company’s business and financial records, the Company has never been a shell
company as defined by Rule 405 and Rule 144(i)(1)(i) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 12b-2 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

[price_and_volume]

That added paragraph is an obvious lie.

Does it matter, will it matter?

Who knows?

OTCM knows $VXIT is a shell - claiming otherwise when you’ve NEVER had any operational business or revenue is silly.

[m$teamworkotc]

he means with all the potential being thrown around not even 90 bux is being thrown at the 0009 ask

[trader_ron]

not sure I follow, what do you mean?

[Prestotic]

Me thinks today's volume tells it all

[Prestotic]

You tell em price....such dreamers

[m$teamworkotc]

pink current and lose the shell status...$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

[m$teamworkotc]

agreed 100%...lets start with pink current and hope he starts a PR campaign or at least free twitter
.0008 is rediculous

[beer$$money]

$VXIT or a shareholder could DD the information that is available to the public to determine the correction needed to bring VXIT Pink Current. The current corrected Attorney Letter required information that was not in the previous 2 Attorney Letters filed by WHITLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW.

This paragraph was added:

The Issuer has provided written representation that, based on personal knowledge, review of public
filings and review of the Company’s business and financial records, the Company has never been a shell
company as defined by Rule 405 and Rule 144(i)(1)(i) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 12b-2 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

This can be confirmed because the same information was in the last Attorney Letter that was filed by S O N F I E L D & S O N F I E L D
12/01/2022 Attorney Letter with Respect to Current Information 08/31/2022
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/354376/content

[beer$$money]

$VXIT the corrected/updated Attorney Letter with Respect to Current Information should bring VXIT status to Pink Current. OTC Markets sends the company a notification detailing what is missing from the Attorney Letter for correction that will bring the status to Pink Current.

[Cambreau]

The company could answer that question in less than 2 minutes on their free Twitter ( X ) account. Will they ?

[otc37]

3. The Information includes all of the information that a broker-dealer would be required to
obtain from the Issuer to publish a quotation for the Issuer’s securities under Rule 15c2-11
under the Exchange Act.

On OTCMarkets.com

Warning!  Limited Information

OTC Markets Group has confirmed that this company has limited disclosure or financial information publicly available, but meets a minimum requirement for public quoting under Rule 15c2-11. The Pink Limited Information tier may include companies that are delinquent in their filing obligations with the SEC, a foreign exchange or regulator, or under the Pink Disclosure Guidelines, as well as non-U.S. companies listed on a foreign exchange that does not require English disclosure and do not certify their compliance with SEC Rule 12g3-2(b).

Note 3 in the attorney letter is saying that they can remain publicly traded under pink limited status.... is this going current or remaining limited? RULE 15C2-11

[Edward]

There’s more to this company than just the scanners!!!

Yes there is, a lying lowlife CEO running a company for years with no sales or earnings, selling very close to the lowest closing stock price in history,and has not communicated with stockholders for appox. 2 years.

This is who shareholders of VXIT CEO James Katzaroff are dealing with:

http://www.clippercorporatepartners.com/2019/02/vivos-slays-dragon-initially-posted.html

(former company he was the CEO with.)

"Unfortunately, the company's future had been mortgaged through toxic debt. The toxic debt was piled onto the company by former CEO, James Katzaroff, almost exclusively to pay the salaries of his wife and himself, as well as take a bunch of pointless and expensive trips to places like Russia, albeit purportedly for the company's benefit, but to no avail. The Katzaroffs had taken as much as a million dollars out of Vivos over the final few years of Jim's tenure as CEO.

Under Jim Katzaroff, the company made very little progress while having its viability placed into jeopardy, all in the name of a paycheck. Katzaroff could have raised money under more responsible terms, but taking on toxic debt was easier and the simpler route to ensure he and his wife got paid. Toxic borrowing is almost always for the benefit of management, so that they are ensured that their pockets are lined--under the guise of salary and usually for doing nothing--without regard to the retail shareholder.

In short, Katzaroff was in breach of his fiduciary duties to Vivos"

[Edward]

he must be retired and bored as fukk to post here and elsewhere so much...

??????????????????

So stated by a poster that has 49,771 posts.

[JMCK6193]

Well, haven't you been saying that for three years now?

[vdog1776]

You obviously know nothing about this company so why do you even bother to comment? There’s more to this company than just the scanners!!! But I guess you will see. Good luck to you!!!

[price_and_volume]

What?? This is ridiculous.

If I’m correct and they do have deal I expect the deals to be high profit margin.

where do you guys get this nonsense?

What deal have you heard about? Or is it just another random guess?

6-10c PPS on these super low-margin scanners that nobody wants?

Why wouldn’t you be loaded in $DTII shares if you believe these stupid things are in demand?

Which they’re apparently not… just like JK’s sun ovens, masks, disinfecting BS, or solar mobility wheelchairs.

Here’s the coming “deal”: 2.5 BILLION dilutive shares as soon as JK can get this current & convince some fools he’s a worthwhile investment.

[JMCK6193]

Bahahahaha lolololol

[vdog1776]

If we get the news I think we may get I’m guessing we may hit .06 - .10. If I’m correct and they do have deal I expect the deals to be high profit margin. I think we could go way above the high of .12 if they have the goods. On the bad side if they don’t have much of anything we might only see .01 I don’t think they would be spending the money to get current if they didn’t have deals but who knows.

I do know this I think a lot of shares are lock up! I think this could cause a HUGE run if they have the right news along with people holding. Because of the past I’m guessing we will see a lot of selling around .01 - .02 but I think longer term people will pickup those shares pushing this higher quicker! But if all about what news they have!

[m$teamworkotc]

what's your target sells vdog?

[price_and_volume]

Why? They've lied and convinced others to buy&hold.

would be nice to see jimy/jbb/other longs posting again too.

Those are the same guys who enabled JK's BS, by claiming to have inside-info ("secret DD") directly from the big boss, only to see NOTHING EVER EVER EVER come from any of those lies.

You don't have to encourage liars to post and you don't have to convince pumpers to pump.

But to join them is pretty fucking sleazy.

At least if you listened to bashers you would have dumped this long ago, and you'd be in a better position to buy again if you want WHEN IT ACTUALLY MOVES.

Don't get shitty w/ bashers for pointing out the truth - bashers don't cause price-collapse, pumpers SELLING TO THE NAIVE BELIEVERS is what causes it here & elsewhere.

GLTA

[vdog1776]

I agree I think something good is coming I just hope it’s as big as I hope for! I really want to have a relaxing summer :)

[m$teamworkotc]

I see your posting again kev3, hmmmmmmmmm
would be nice to see jimy/jbb/other longs posting again too.

[kevin 3]

!!!!! (( POST OF THE DAY )) !!!!!