Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
And you will find yourself in a dafamation law suit if any information is false and misleading. My lawsuit I will file will have to get in line behind others!
4...wtf is uhp headquarters doing in the same small town as a cpa, pipng off utter bullshit on this board, across the country from the supposed CEO? This town is in the middle of the desert surrounding by nothing. And why would a stockbroker, working for a capital management firm, be CEO of a magic bandage firm?
Trust, I’ve noticed that you’re getting in the habit of posting right after me and pretending you didn’t see my post.
Hilarious, your childish behaviour is beyond compare.
Anyway, when you’re private messaging with dr5 in 3 minutes, tell him I’m waiting for a response.
3...An internet search of the Riishard Rodriguez CPA leads to the following address:
You guys are funny. Rodman, this is not your last post. Ignore Ihub, they rarely take things down now, because all the posters know that they’re just a vehicle for stock bashers to help banks and hedge funds companies, keep stocks lower. They’re losing posters every single week. Now, we wait for FDA approval which we will get. Then, bashers can suck it.
dr5, when you come out of hiding I would like to know your motivation for posting 510k timelines and not the PMA.
UHP press release clearly states this Is a full PMA and went so far as to provide the FDA link to the PMA process. Literally inviting readers to follow along with the timeline. There is no confusion here at all. Yet, you did your “research” on the 510k.
How desperate are you? The sad thing is no one else here would notice.
But you must have realized I would expose you.
Here’s the Company quote:
The company confirms that it has submitted via the FDA eSTAR portal its Premarket Approval (PMA) application for its absorbable hemostatic gauze, which will now be reviewed by the FDA and Health Canada. Information on the FDA review process for PMA applications can be found on the FDA website at:
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/premarket-approval-pma/pma-review-process.
…..please don’t try to explain that the two are interchangeable and Hemostyp was fast tracked into the 510k process .
Important videos for anyone wanting to understand this stock and how these people operate:
Charles Ponzi The Documentary
Madoff: The Monster of Wall Street
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Inventor:_Out_for_Blood_in_Silicon_Valley
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8488126/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_Money_(2018_TV_series)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7889220/
Victor Lustig: The King of Con Men who Sold the Eiffel Tower
Not Green, just dirty brokers using clients' money to give the illusion there is interest in this scam. Then they sell out from underneath any sucker who falls for it and buys. Actually it is down over 90% in less than 5 years. Just click on the 5 year timeline in this chart: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/UEEC/.
Do your due diligence in evaluating any stock investment! UEEC has submitted their FDA PMA device III information and is
awaiting confirmation and FDA reply!
$5-$10++
"We could experience difficulties in our supply chain"
Same tired, worn out bullshit for over a decade
Surprised or NOT! UHP issued their 10K last week with many qualifications for where we are headed?
https://app.quotemedia.com/data/downloadFiling?webmasterId=90423&ref=318204841&type=PDF&symbol=UEEC&cdn=5c1aeab7c2ba1f6d3f9faca48587b9ec&companyName=United+Health+Products+Inc&formType=10-K&formDescription=Annual+report+pursuant+to+Section+13+or+15%28d%29&dateFiled=2024-04-01
Critical Audit Matters
Critical audit matters are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. We determined that there are no critical audit matters.
/s/ Mac Accounting Group & CPAs, LLP
We have served as United Health Products, Inc.'s auditor since 2019.
Midvale, Utah
April 1, 2024
I discount the matters management has elected to indicate as shortcomings in internal controls but praise their forthcoming of improvements implemented. Richard Rodriguez CPA
$5-$10++
Perfectly stated.
Could not agree more.
They're going to be filthy rich.... If he can get a patent by inserting a minor piece of cloth in a almost 100 year old invention, I'm going to patent a q-tip with a hexagon shaped tip. It's going to be great.
The FDA must erect ueec factories to manufacture the following medical devices,,,It truly boggles the mind to think how rich these shareholders are going to get:
Patents by Inventor Douglas K. Beplate
https://patents.justia.com/patent/5221277
Actually, that was a new one on me about leasing. About two months ago Johnson & Johnson sued the FDA 1.3 trillion for NOT leasing 4 of their plants for them.
I didn't put the dots together and knew that UHP was in such an incredible position with the FDA. This changes everything.
Haven't you heard Zorax? The FDA is so impressed with hemoshit that they are fully funding the manufacturing plant, which will dwarf the GM and Ford assembly plants in MI and OH. In fact they are spending their entire budget. There are 100 priests, 100 rabbis, 100 pastors, 100 imams, 100 nuns, and 100 monks volunteering around the clock to erect the manufacturing plant. During the clinical trials, doctors were just touching the hemoshit to foreheads of paraplegics and patients who had spent their lifetime in wheelchairs and they all got up dancing. This is pure fact. Buy!! Buy!!!! BUY!!!!!!!!...and get rich, Rich, RICH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"we doubt that shareholders will hear about it. We expect it will be just like when UEEC applied for PMA approval for Class III in late 2017, there will just not be any updates, like it never happened."
Who are you leaving your shares to chrism0000? The PMA was filed in frikkin 2017. I've posted the evidence many times. Are you this dense? It failed many, many years ago. Can you name one employee that is not purely a Ponzi Scheme Operator (those happen to be these internet con men running this boiler room)? The product is a sham and no functional company exists.
Chris I hear you!!! I’m sitting on a huge position nothing would make Me happier than an approval and someone that has interest in our product.. I’m just being very realistic and the end I’m sure will justify the means.. Good luck
NOOOOO!!!!! MORE!!!!!!!! WAITING!!!!!!!!!!!!
What would be nice would be if everyone would admit that we have a lot of things that are unknown to us and we don’t have the answers.. we have some bulls that are optimistic and we have a couple of bashers that will never admit the agenda they have.. will never disclose if they’re long or short or even have a position.. whatever the case I’m pretty sure we’ll be finding things out in time to come.. maybe a month maybe 6 months.. I’ve waited years I can wait another year if I have to
This coming from someone who has been dead_wrong in every single post he has made going back to the start of ihub (and speaking to someone who posted accurate and honest information). This coming from someone who has misled anyone, at every turn, who has been naive and gullible enough to pay credence to him. Can you name one single post of yours that has been accurate and came true? Just one? You have the most lack of self-awareness of anyone that ever lived. Even a bull with chronic diarrhea would be duly impressed with what you spew.
"Your full of shit!"
bull·shit
/'boolSHit/
VULGAR SLANG
noun
stupid or untrue talk or writing; nonsense.
verb
talk nonsense to (someone), typically to be misleading or deceptive.
Your full of shit!
$5-$10++
In fact,the FDA which leased the company the manufacturing plant has been carrying the company to the finish line.
Classic, when all your data proves a lie, attack the members.
Totally agree! FDA has had the PMA in inventory and worked on two or more occasions. No need to reinvent the wheel.
Don’t know Chris. But what I do know is that it’s not a new application and the 180 day clock in no way, shape or form has been reset. It could be a couple weeks, it could be three months but I’m pretty sure the FDA is not gonna want their new application to take a long time which would make their new system look completely stupid.
Chris, a belated Happy Birthday.
I wasn’t posting in March so I missed it.
I’m sure it’s been a long two years since dr5 promised you a happy birthday gift of approval. Hopefully, you didn’t believe his empty promise:
DR5
Re: Chrism0000 post# 8244
Sunday, 01/09/2022 1:57:57 PM
Your birthday present will come well before that.
And now here we are in 2024 and he’s still trying to make “educated guesses”
This coming from someone who has dead wrong in every single post going back to the start of ihub. Can you name one single post of yours that has been accurate and came true? Just one? What happened to following your own advice before advising others?
"Enough of your BS!"
bull·shit
/'boolSHit/
VULGAR SLANG
noun
stupid or untrue talk or writing; nonsense.
verb
talk nonsense to (someone), typically to be misleading or deceptive.
CHARLIESAN
Re: rodman post# 12756
Tuesday, December 19, 2023 12:11:04 PM
Post# 12757 of 13460
"Yes, I am a loser; about 800K in this position; and I own a significant amount of shares; in the 7 digits. You must be braindead to think that this CEO and management team do not deserve criticism in their inability to get a PMA filed. They need prodded; pushed; criticized; by any means necessary to accomplish their duties. So you will stand by another year and watch paint dry? Their communication and actions are a travesty and reek of incompetence. Calling it like it is. If you cannot see this you might look in the mirror before denigrating others."
Lol. The only thing I want to know is, will we be making money before the end of this summer? LOL
"The Bull Shit Detection Rules
No1: Wherever possible there must be INDEPENDENT unbiased confirmation of the “facts.”
That means any research trial published that shows an effect or not needs to be reproduced by another independent party BEFORE we can claim there is or isn’t an effect.
No2: Encourage open honest and substantive debate on the evidence by proponents from ALL sides. This means open, honest, transparent, public debate and discourse is needed by all interested parties regardless of their position or standing, and not only limited to just those with affiliations or connections in closed and private meetings.
No3: Arguments from an authority carry little weight.
Authorities have made mistakes in the past, and they will do so again in the future. There are NO authorities; at most, there are experts, but this still does not make them immune from questioning or challenging.
No4: If there’s something to be explained, think of ALL the different ways in which it could be explained. Think of tests you could do that might systematically DISPROVE the alternatives. What survives among the “multiple hypotheses,” has a much better chance of being the right answer than the first idea that caught your fancy.
No5: Do not to get overly ATTACHED to a hypothesis just because it’s yours.
Ask yourself why you like the idea. Compare it fairly with ALL the alternatives. See if you can find reasons for REJECTING it. If you don’t, others will.
No6: Quantify it.
If whatever it is you’re explaining has some measure, you’ll be much better able to discriminate among competing hypotheses. What is vague and qualitative is open to MANY explanations. Of course there are truths to be sought in qualitative issues, but finding them is more challenging.
No7: Every link in the chain must work (including the premise)
If there is a chain of event or procedures that have to occur to arrive at a result they must all be reproducible, not just most of them. Even if one part of a chain can not be repeated then the result can not be trusted.
No8: Occam’s Razor always applies.
When faced with two hypotheses that explain the data/outcome equally well the SIMPLER one is usually always more correct.
No9: Is the hypothesis FALSIFIABLE?
Ideas and theories that are untestable are not worth much. Others must be given the chance to try and duplicate your experiments to see if they get the same result."
Lol. The only thing I want to know is, will we be making money before the end of this summer? LOL
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |