9th Largest Certified Claimant Sues Billionaire Fanjul Family-Controlled Company For Trafficking In Sugar From Cuba To UK. This Lawsuit Could Be A Brawl.
May 11, 2021
On 2 May 2021, Summit, New Jersey-based Francisco Sugar Company (OTCPK: FRAZ) is the 9th largest Certified Claimant (US$53,389,438.37) filed a Libertad Act Title III lawsuit against West Palm Beach, Florida-based ASR Group International, Inc. (2019 revenues approximately US$500 million) relating to a shipment of sugar from the Republic of Cuba to the United Kingdom. ASR Group International is a part of the commercial holdings of the Fanjul brothers (estimated net worth US$8.2 billion)- Alfonso "Alfy" Fanjul Jr., José "Pepe" Fanjul, Alexander Fanjul, and Andres Fanjul.
The Trump Administration (2021-2021) on 2 May 2019 made operational Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act of 1996 (known as “Libertad Act”). Title III authorizes lawsuits in United States District Courts against companies and individuals who are using a certified claim or non-certified claim where the owner of the certified claim or non-certified claim has not received compensation from the Republic of Cuba or from a third-party who is using (“trafficking”) the asset.
Seeking Alpha (December 2016): “Francisco Industries (OTCPK:FRAZ). You thought there is no way to invest in Cuba? Think again. FRAZ allows you to buy a part of a Cuban land claim by what appears to be a business that used to run a sugar mill on the island until the Cuban revolution, during which many US business had their assets seized by the new government. Some of them launched a legal claim to get compensation, and FRAZ did the same. You can see the biggest verified claims in this Washington Post article, and the company is one of them.”
ASR Group International brands include Domino Sugar, C&H, Repath, Tate & Lyle, Sidul, SRB, Belize, Sugar, Ingenio San Nicolas, and Tellus. “Florida Crystals Corporation and Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida, two family-owned sugarcane farmers and millers, came together more than 20 years ago to form a strategic partnership to begin large-scale refining of their raw sugar. The collaboration laid the groundwork for what would quickly become the world's most successful and innovative cane sugar company: ASR Group. Florida Crystals Corporation was founded by the Fanjul family in South Florida, in the United States in 1960 as a sugarcane farming and milling company. Its first harvest of 4,000 acres in Palm Beach County yielded 10,000 tons of raw sugar. The family has a long tradition in sugarcane, dating back to 1850 in Cuba, and they understood the key to success meant expanding their land holdings in order to secure a supply of sugarcane for their mills. Today, the company farms more than 190,000 acres in Florida where it owns two sugar mills, a sugar refinery, a packaging and distribution center and a rice mill.” The company has substantial non-certified non-filed claims against the Republic of Cuba.
North American Congress on Latin America (February 2014): “The Washington Post made a splash Sunday with a long feature on Palm Beach, FL-based sugar magnate and Cuban exile Alfonso “Alfy” Fanjul. The headline: “Sugar tycoon...now open to investing in Cuba under the right circumstances.” The article brings to public light what has been an open secret for some time now: over the last few years, Fanjul- a once stalwart funder of anti-Castro causes and organizations like the Cuban American National Foundation and the U.S.-Cuba Democracy PAC (the pro-embargo lobby)- has travelled to Cuba at least twice [April 2012 and February 2013] as part of delegations organized by the Brookings Institution. On the island, he has met with Cuba’s Foreign Minister and apparently toured under-producing state-owned sugar mills with an eye to future investments.”
Francisco Industries, Inc. v. ASR Group International, Inc. [2:21-cv-14188]
Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton PA (plaintiff)
Complaint Not Available (filed 5/2/21)
Francisco Industries, Inc. v. ASR Group International, Inc. [2:21-cv-14189]
Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton PA (plaintiff)
Link To 92-Page Complaint (5/2/21)
Francisco Industries, Inc. v. ASR Group International, Inc. [1:21-cv-21679]
Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton PA (plaintiff)
Link To 92-Page Complaint (5/2/21)
Excerpts:
ASR also had actual knowledge of Cuba’s confiscation of Francisco. ASR executive José F. Fanjul, Jr.’s father has owned 3,989 shares of Francisco for many years. José F. Fanjul, Jr.’s grandfather, Alfonso Fanjul, worked for Francisco prior to confiscation and 6 Through its wholly owned subsidiary Compañia Maritima Guayabal, S.A., Francisco was awarded the Port of Guayabal concession pursuant to Fulgencio Batista’s Presidential Decree No. 3,749, dated November 10, 1955. That Decree was published in La Gaceta de La Habana on November 15, 1955.
ASR violated Helms-Burton by purchasing Francisco-grown cane sugar and exporting that sugar from the Port of Guayabal to ASR’s refinery in London.
As just one example, on or about July 27, 2016, ASR knowingly and intentionally purchased a shipment of cane sugar that all presently known facts suggest derived from Francisco’s confiscated assets north of Guayabal. Francisco’s arable land, as well as sugar produced by that land, constitutes confiscated property as defined by the Helms-Burton Act.
AZCUBA, an alter ego of the Cuban government, maintains a monopoly on all aspects of the sugar business in Cuba. AZCUBA is as trafficker according to Helms-Burton because it “possesses”, “manages”, “uses” or “holds an interest in” Francisco’s sugar growing land, and it engaged in “a commercial activity using or otherwise benefitting from confiscated property” when it sold Francisco-grown sugar. The Francisco-grown sugar was shipped from the Port of Guayabal on July 27, 2016, and delivered to ASR’s London refinery on August 16, 2016.
h ttps://www.cubatrade.org/blog/2021/5/11/a2ii6657qt774f2e6dsr8qwgz6ehg8
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
Companies are chronically overlooked by Wall Street. Wall Street coverage is positively correlated to a company's market capitalization, leaving smaller-cap stocks with less coverage and greater opportunity for mispricing. Institutional investors often spend little effort researching micro-cap and small-cap opportunities because of their limited impact on major indices. This lack of coverage allows disciplined Investors to buy stocks that trade for less than their intrinsic value. 
AI
