Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
First, name changes go through FINRA not the SEC.
A public company can change its name as many times as it wants during its existence.
Why hasn't Sharp brought a merger company to the table?
But Sharp was pumping:
"George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC
@GeorgeASharp
Discussions are ongoing with potential acquisition or r/m targets. In fact, there is another conference call this morning. As clean shells, both $WNFT and $SRNW are attractive vehicles to those seeking to go public & are receiving a lot of attention by both targets and funders.
9:25 AM · Jul 8, 2022"
That was over 2 years ago where are the targets and funders?
"That may be true but GS already has another ticker ready to go that hasn't had a name change... SRNW"
IG
Actually that's an interesting question. GS took the trouble and expense to change the names of both GVSI and WNFT with the hopes of attracting a suitor. He might have also had a comprehensive strategy of attracting multiple companies, since he opted for the term, 'Global'/'World-Wide' in their respective names.
When he changed the tickers back then, crypto, blockchain, and NFT's were all super hot topics. Today they have cooled off considerably. In retrospect the preempted name changes may not have worked out quite as he had planned, which brings me to believe that with SRNW, GS may feel that the name change was both limiting and unnecessary, ...and as a result will choose to let the merging candidate make their own changes.
JMHO
Actually that's an interesting question. GS took the trouble and expense to change the names of both GVSI and WNFT with the hopes of attracting a suitor. He might have also had a comprehensive strategy of attracting multiple companies, since he opted for the term, 'Global'/'World-Wide' in their respective names.
When he changed the tickers back then, crypto, blockchain, and NFT's were all super hot topics. Today they have cooled off considerably. In retrospect the preempted name changes may not have worked out quite as he had planned, which brings me to believe that with SRNW, GS may feel that the name change was both limiting and unnecessary, ...and as a result will choose to let the merging candidate make their own changes.
JMHO
Actually that's an interesting question. GS took the trouble and expense to change the names of both GVSI and WNFT with the hopes of attracting a suitor. He might have also had a comprehensive strategy of attracting multiple companies, since he opted for the term, 'Global'/'World-Wide' in their respective names.
When he changed the tickers back then, crypto, blockchain, and NFT's were all super hot topics. Today they have cooled off considerably. In retrospect the preempted name changes may not have worked out quite as he had planned, which brings me to believe that with SRNW, GS may feel that the name change was both limiting and unnecessary, ...and as a result will choose to let the merging candidate make their own changes.
JMHO
Actually that's an interesting question. GS took the trouble and expense to change the names of both GVSI and WNFT with the hopes of attracting a suitor. He might have also had a comprehensive strategy of attracting multiple companies, since he opted for the term, 'Global'/'World-Wide' in their respective names.
When he changed the tickers back then, crypto, blockchain, and NFT's were all super hot topics. Today they have cooled off considerably. In retrospect the preempted name changes may not have worked out quite as he had planned, which brings me to believe that with SRNW, GS may feel that the name change was both limiting and unnecessary, ...and as a result will choose to let the merging candidate make their own changes.
JMHO
Actually that's an interesting question. GS took the trouble and expense to change the names of both GVSI and WNFT with the hopes of attracting a suitor. He might have also had a comprehensive strategy of attracting multiple companies, since he opted for the term, 'Global'/'World-Wide' in their respective names.
When he changed the tickers back then, crypto, blockchain, and NFT's were all super hot topics. Today they have cooled off considerably. In retrospect the preempted name changes may not have worked out quite as he had planned, which brings me to believe that with SRNW, GS may feel that the name change was both limiting and unnecessary, ...and as a result will choose to let the merging candidate make their own changes.
JMHO
There is the unlikely possibility (I mentioned this conspiracy theory months ago), that while WNFT reverted back to the expert markets for a few months earlier this year, GS or members of his team may have used the opportunity to buy up millions of shares for fractions of a penny.
There was no possibility!
SRNW will need a name change too, and I've wondered about how that will play out. Will they announce the deal and let SRNW trade for a month or two while the name change takes shape? Or do they have the name change queued up such that it will change on the same day the DA is signed? If it's a solid company, I would presume the latter.
That may be true but GS already has another ticker ready to go that hasn't had a name change... SRNW. I would guess that the SEC would frown on someone changing their name like they change their underwear. There's likely a limit or limited time period.
Not what I said. Read it again and again. Maybe just maybe it might sink in, but I doubt it.
The shell can be renamed to anything. The current name means nothing imo.
GS himself.??
#1. If GS bought millions of shares, based on the SS he would have had to announce/file.
#2. Why would he buy shares when he can issued them to himself.
Very dumb to say the least....................................................... Did you go to the vr sterling school? SMH
You're assuming that a 'decision' is a final outcome. Based on the numerous delays over a legal technicality that has little to do with the actual case,
Hi MrSmith18, you've said elsewhere that you expect the WNFT case to drag on forever. If that's the case why do you think GS said there would be a decision in 60 days?
Gonna be a good merger when the tides turn 🚀
How many actually made coin on TSNP? Everyone claims they did which is BS. There are still bas holders over there pumping their asses off @.0001!
This will never become a real company as the OTC changed.
I hope you use a lot of cut & paste, because the time to type up your posts is time wasted, ...and I mean a lot of time.
Not so smart, after all!
LOL!
I guarantee you pumper boy that Sharp will never bring a real company to the table for a merger.
There has never been a real company use a hijacked shell like SRNW to go public.
Sharp owned warrants ($2,000,000) of TSNP/HMBL but the when the year was over HUMBL never hit the strike price and the warrants were worthless. And FORW never made a profit from the warrants.
You are clueless about the Feds cutting the rates - and it will never trickle to the OTC.
Damn, you aren't very bright when you post pumping BS like the following:
"The half point cut should trigger the expected rotation from large caps to mid and small cap companies. Powell's testimony today seemed overall positive. He re-enforced the soft-landing scenario, which Wall Street has been predicting, i.e. strong labor, stable prices."
The discussion was about exchange traded stocks - not the OTC garbage.
Then you are yammering again about OTC liquidity - which is a joke.
"For now, I'd keep an eye on the OTC's increased interest and liquidity in the weeks ahead. OTC has been too quiet for too long."
The OTC is for the novice, gullible and naive investors - they are like the penny slot players who dream of a Villa in the Caribbean but always lose their ass.
It has been 3 years for SRNW and Sharp hasn't brought in any merger candidates. But you are just a paid pumper.
You started by posting ad nauseam about shorting and naked shorting none of which was true.
IG
I never invest in OTC scams.
I warned everyone that TSNP/HMBL was a share selling scheme - and I was 100% accurate.
You weren't around then - you started being Sharp's little pumper boy on 07/07/2023 - so you really don't know anything about the TSNP/HMBL scam.
I warned all of the gullible and naive investors not to get married to the stock but they believed the hype and were caught chasing and holding and never made a profit.
My words were to play the price action and always take profits.
I have been following Sharp and knew he was a serial scammer back in 2014. But Sharp never cost me a penny because I was far too smart to buy stock in anything where Sharp was involved.
You fabricate information about me - and I expose you for being a pumping Bum!
IG
Response by a pamper clown?????????????
Spoken like someone who has one heck of an axe to grind. You had one bad call in Nov of '21 (selling out of HMBL too early), and now you seek compensation by bashing GS 24/7 to others you don't even know or care about you.
Truly sad...
More pumping nonsense - the rate cut means nothing to OTC stocks - it will have a small effect on Exchange traded stocks.
The rate cut certainly doesn't mean more liquidity on the OTC.
Sharp hasn't brought a single merger for 3 years to GOFF/WNFT, SRNW and GVSI - and it has been 6 years for GRDO/FORW.
Sharp will never do a merger with a real company.
IG
The driving factor for GS will be increased interest/liquidity in the OTC. That could happen at anytime now that rates are officially expected to drop. That said, I expect bonds to rise followed by a correction in the equity markets. Under this scenario, profits will flow from equities to bonds. However, some of that cash will make its way to small caps and ultimately the OTC. FYI: OTC doesn't need much to get super recharged again.
What could go wrong is that equity markets continue to rise while interest rates drop. It happened unexpectedly with the introduction of Gen AI but has less of a chance of repeating itself, in my opinion.
The elections are more important for the mega merger deals. I don't see them hampering a GS size-deal.
JMHO
Thanks MrSmith18, this makes sense. Just curious on one thing - earlier you were pretty firm on September and these deals being announced before elections to avoid risk. Are you now firmly saying they will happen after elections?
The comedy show continues while GS stocks are beginning a major sell off. Clown will not accomplish anything of value.
My focus is on SRNW. It's ripe and ready for a merger. Volume has been increasing significantly. Once this one pops, the others will follow. The bargain of the lot is FORW. It still holds SRNW warrants. It should be trading at 10% of SRNW or $0.013, if you compare their MC's, i.e. 50m for SNRW vs 500m for FORW.
The half point cut should trigger the expected rotation from large caps to mid and small cap companies. Powell's testimony today seemed overall positive. He re-enforced the soft-landing scenario, which Wall Street has been predicting, i.e. strong labor, stable prices.
The elephant in the room is the election result. A lot of large deals seem to be on hold until after Nov 5. If it remains a close race, then there's the potential Trump 'sore loser syndrome' to watch for too.
For now, I'd keep an eye on the OTC's increased interest and liquidity in the weeks ahead. OTC has been too quiet for too long. I believe SRNW or FORW or both are all wrapped up deals that are simply waiting for a final green light. Today's half point move could be the tipping point GS has been waiting for.
JMHO
Hi MrSmith18, the Fed cut rates by half a point which is great news. How do you feel about this in the context of trifecta?
1. Do you feel like SRNW is finally ready now, along with FORW? There doesn't seem to be anything else holding them back.
2. What are your thoughts on WNFT? The 60 days from the last update are up and we haven't heard anything yet. Any thoughts?
Thanks!
Yeah some nice buys today
Nice to see some real volume today and .14 hit again.
"Drugdoctor
Wednesday, 01/25/2023 2:31:10 PM
Amazing how stable the price has become at the .33 level ($1.65 pre-split equiv). Really only traders that understand the value here are buying the shares the impatienttraders are letting go down here. $SRNW will go whenever George has a development with it or any of his other holdings."
So the price is holding steady at $0.3299 - but the current price is $0.1331.
So your idea of holding steady is the price down 60%.
IG
Yeah can’t wait for the fireworks $SRNW
Limited vocabulary.
You have been saying Tick Toc for 3 years on every Sharp scam.
IG
Here is the reason Sharp hasn't found a company to merge with SRNW.
SRNW has the following warning:
"Warning! This security is eligible for Unsolicited Quotes Only
This stock is not eligible for proprietary broker-dealer quotations. All quotes in this stock reflect unsolicited customer orders. Unsolicited-Only stocks have a higher risk of wider spreads, increased volatility, and price dislocations. Investors may have difficulty selling this stock. An initial review by a broker-dealer under SEC Rule15c2-11 is required for brokers to publish competing quotes and provide continuous market making."
Shell companies had 18 months from September 28, 2021 - the 18-month period expired on March 28, 2023. During that time the shell company must complete a reverse merger with an operating business or begin operations themselves before March 28, 2023. And SRNW is still a shell company and it will impossible for SRNW to file a 15c2-11 and have FINRA process it.
If not the company loses their piggyback status and have to file a new 15c2-11.
That is why Sharp has made so many excuses over the last 3 years - now he is obsessed with Rosen which won't benefit any of the shells.
IG
LMAO! Your pumping is too funny.
"If you recall how GS handled Callesse"
Why don't you learn to spell Calasse.
Sharp lied in District Court about Calasse - Sharp told the Court that Calasse didn't exist.
Sharp lied about service to Calasse.
Sharp attempted to steal the Calasse stock and the SEC slapped Sharp around and made him return the stock to Calasse.
You must be tired from being Sharp's little pumper boy and carrying water for him 247.
Why hasn't Sharp found a company to merge with SRNW?
IG
Typical pumper post!
It was hilarious - the Attorney asked Rosen if he had ever used any other names and he explained it.
Sharp it is time you sack up and explain why you use the name George Sharp when your name was George Helischauer.
Hey Sharp - Rosen made you look like the idiot that you are.
Why isn't Sharp working on his 4 shells instead of being obsessed by. Rosen - getting a judgement against Rosen won't help the SRNW shareholders.
IG
I watched the remaining videos. It confirms pretty much what I stated earlier with some additional intel.
First, Rosen is very likely suffering from ADHD and his attorney did what he could to keep him focused. GS's attorney in turn knew this about Rosen and slowly and meticulously raked Rosen through the coals mercilessly. It felt like a form of medieval torture.
Despite anything Rosen could say, GS's attorney kept asking the same question, "Where does it say that GS purchased 50m warrants of HMBL for $5k?" Once Rosen saw that his claim was baseless, he lost it and chose to cancel the deposition. It was an emotional move that may cost him dearly, going forward.
After watching all six videos...
It became clear to me what GS and his attorney were doing. They knew ahead of time that they would be taping the deposition and eventually posting them on twitter, hence, every question and every laboriously repeated question was deliberately orchestrated to let Rosen look like a 'clown' on his own terms. They basically let Rosen hang himself in front of his followers. ...and quite frankly, it worked. Rosen not only looked like a fool but he shared very personal info and past delinquencies. The level of embarrassment from admitting his past faults was bad enough but absolutely escalated beyond recognition once he knew that the videos were available unvarnished on YouTube/X for his followers and public to watch for generations to come! Ouch!
Rosen must be absolutely beside himself right now! ...and will only go bonkers when he sits down to settle with GS. If you recall how GS handled Callesse, I would expect a similar situation, i.e. "here's my deal for today. If you don't take it, tomorrows will be half as much, and so forth." ...and since GS's intent is to make Rosen a poster child for his other enemies to see, you can be quite certain that GS will not make life easy for Rosen for a very long time.
Some may see all of GS's efforts as just personal revenge, which I'm sure some of it maybe true, however, I'm of the belief that GS is simply being business prudent. Prior to closing any deals with his tickers, he wants to be absolutely certain that any one even thinking of orchestrating a 'coordinated attack' or similar on his tickers, ...that they should think again or otherwise face lifelong consequences.
If I were one of his partners or investors, I'd certainly be looking for these assurances before moving forward.
All that said...
Does GS have deals lined up or not for this Fall? I'd be inclined to say, yes. Regardless, ...one thing is for sure... GS knows very well that all it takes is one tweet to send all of his tickers north. He's not going to waste that opportunity unless he's 150% certain it will stick.
JMHO
That is too funny - Sharp is the one who has been decimated, humiliated, and essentially discredited beyond recourse.
What has Sharp accomplished in 3 years or 6 years on FORW?
Why are you carrying water for Sharp - Sharp has 4 Zombie tickers and you are leading the charge that Rosen is a bad guy - but Rosen has absolutely nothing to do with Sharp's tickers.
Rosen doesn't seem like a beaten man.
"
Brett Rosen
@BrettRosen325
I have a question for little Georgie since he wants to talk shit about everyone else’s deals; what is going on with $HMBL , $FORW , $WNFT & $GVSI? It appears all of them have completely wiped out shareholder value! Aren’t you involved or in charge of ALL those companies? It’s funny how you can’t ever talk about any of those companies and how much you have fucked over shareholders for years!"
And you aren't smart enough to understand that you have been scammed by Sharp.
IG
They are released.
The rest are up! What did you think?
Huh? Like what? Why?
No. surfkast = surfcast! SMH! But I did surf back in the day. Also played OTC scams. Now I fish and bust scams.
Some companies wait longer. Others back out at the last minute due to unfavorable market conditions. It's a little like surfing. You have to time it right to catch a wave. ...just paddling won't cut it.
Oh, wait! Doesn't your ID name suggest that you know something about surfing? Obviously you have no clue!
What company would wait one year for a deal. Too much Hopium here.
Blame Rosen. LOL Two gonifs fighting each other. Precious!
Thanks MrSmith18. What stands out to me is that the share structure of SRNW still exactly matches the deal that was described in August of 2023. No changes have been made to shares outstanding or warrants. It seems like there are two possibilities here:
1. The deal from last August is still on
2. The deal is not on and GS has not found a deal to replace it yet, therefore has made no changes
If he really did swap that deal for a new one that is going to be announced relatively soon, he would have made changes already I would think. It's extremely unlikely that two deals will have the exact same characteristics (down to 1.1m shares being issued to two officers). What do you think?
September still has a few weeks left for GS to offer a meaningful update. I'm guessing now that he's focused on posting the remaining videos then he'll be looking to assess what real impact it will have on Rosen and any other of his many enemies should he (GS) choose to move forward with his tickers.
If Rosen is decimated, humiliated, and essentially discredited beyond recourse then the coast will be clear for GS, in my opinion. Until he reveals the last three videos, we can only speculate.
JMHO
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |