Seesmart Technologies Inc (fka SEST)

[Slojab]

Maybe White hijacked the "other Seesmart".

No pr about an acquisition, no notice of a R/M, no update on OTCMarkets, nothing on the "other Seesmart" website and of course nothing on SEST's website, because they no longer have one.

And as you pointed out, gte, nothing about any new officers on the Nevada SOS website.

Even for a pinksheeter, this is a highly unusual way of doing things.

[gte_gold]

According to the State of Nevada, the only Seesmart Technologies officer is the same as the named officer in the previous corporation. That fact is not likely to be forgotten due to a name change. Their past performance is also likely to be mentioned.

[Slojab]

The "other Seesmart" is already a publicly traded company and is listed on the Frankfurt Exchange.

http://ir.seesmartled.com/share.php

And maybe the reason Bloomberg has them mixed up is because the company is already in their files of public companies.

http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/APF:GR

Bloomberg may have made the same erroneous connection White hopes others make as well, and took the description from the other Seesmart.

The other Seesmart would have to have done a R/M into ONFI in order to be connected in any way.

[90 West]

I have 11, that would be $99
cant wait.

[Kuzami]

If they ever get the price up to where I can sell my share and cover the cost of commission, I'll gladly sell and move on. I'll give it a year before I either see the SEC shut em down, or another split/name change...which will it be?

[Slojab]

Looks like it's a mistake to me.

Unless someone can find something to link them, that's all it is.

What's the link?

[Slojab]

We know the history here and the principals involved.

What we don't know is what "Seesmart Technologies Inc" is and where it came from and how it came to be.

Perhaps you could enlighten us.

[dubble]

here's the truth - 3 splits, 3 completely separate companies. I don't know who you originally bought shares from. According to the history it was formerly owned by a Travis B. and another company called Roadwings that was owned by him as well. Now it's owned by Seesmart - so why does everyone keep referring to this "onfi tech" ? They do NOT own Seesmart.
Sorry if your investment with Roadwings did not work out, time to move on and post positive things about a new corporation.

[Kuzami]

Here's the truth. 1 share left after 3 splits and as many trading symbols. Never once have they shown anything close to being a legitimate business.

[90 West]

a lot of people own this, but going up wont do much
when all your shares are gone and all your left with is'
as in my case 11 shares LOL

[gte_gold]

It does appear that Seesmart, inc. and Seesmart Technologies are related, but there isn't information at OTCMarkets to support that claim.

[National Sponsor]

Why Yahooo Finance has them listed as the company then?

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=SEST.PK

Please note the executives, addess, website, etc.

[National Sponsor]

Just another mark on the way to $723.00.

[appie]

ASK 11,00$$$$$ ??????

[Slojab]

Bloomberg may have made the same erroneous connection White hopes others make as well, and took the description from the other Seesmart.

The other Seesmart would have to have done a R/M into ONFI in order to be connected in any way.

I think the reply you get will be "interesting". ( :

[gte_gold]

I find it hard to believe they were developing LED products and "helping" the Navajo nation at the same time :)
I'm very interested in learning the source of that quote. Could just be a simple mistake, but I'm suspicious knowing the history of the players involved. Bloomberg Businessweek still has that quote on their site here.

Seesmart Technologies, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and markets general illumination products that exclusively use LEDs as their light source. The company was formerly known as OneFi Technology, Inc. and changed its name to Seesmart Technologies, Inc. on February 17, 2012. Seesmart Technologies, Inc. was founded in 2008 and is based in Simi Valley, California.

Will be interesting to see what SEST eventually publishes at OTCMarkets. Or,... Or, maybe Mr White will post letting us know what SEST is all about.

[Slojab]

It was a cached page, gte. I just saw the blurb on a search.

http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=seesmart+technologies+inc&d=4642327575462823&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=2c2c8418,6a68f82b

I think we already determined they weren't the same. In fact, I think we wondered if the other "Seesmart" knew that White was using a similatr-sounding name. Probably wouldn't appreciate it much. ( :

[gte_gold]

Slojab, where did you find that quote? I saw it on businessweek but wondering if "Seesmart,inc" and "Seesmart Technologies" are the same entity.

gte_gold

[Slojab]

Seesmart Technologies, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and markets general illumination products that exclusively use LEDs as their light source.

Really? The use of the present tense intriques me. ( :

[gte_gold]

SEST is new symbol.

[National Sponsor]

So, The D has dropped from the stock symbol and an additional share has appeared in my Scottrade account.

Hopefully, everything is approaching completion as far as the reverse split is concerned and we can move forward with the plans.

[National Sponsor]

Let's stay on topic guys.

[Slojab]

How so? You get 15 posts a day.

[90 West]

Used his last post to say its his last post.
gotta love it.

[National Sponsor]

I have run out of posts for the day :{

[Slojab]

Let me rephrase. ( :

What is the mc valuing?

[National Sponsor]

$74,250,000 market capitalization

[Slojab]

What exactly in the case of ONFI is it fair market value OF?

[Kuzami]

Man, if it were priced at $753/sh, I STILL couldn't get all of my investment back after the three splits I've now seen...LOL

[National Sponsor]

It is fair market value as far as I am concerned.

We just have to wait for the news, I suppose. I may be way off base...

[Slojab]

I'm not sure if you're being serious or just reflecting what OTCMarkets says.

Fair market on this stock is $753 a share

THAT sounds reasonable????

[National Sponsor]

Fair market on this stock is $753 a share. Market Cap of roughly $74,250,000.

This should reasonable. I can notbelieve that you can buy these shares for $3.00 right now.

Nuts.

[National Sponsor]

This stock is on fire...

[Slojab]

It's still "no info", but OTCMarkets has begun placing caveat emptor on stocks regardless of their tier status.

[National Sponsor]

I noticed that www.pinksheets.com has stoped teh display of quotes on this security.

Is it delisted and now on the grey market or what exactly?

Do we still have a market maker or is it solicitation only?

[Slojab]

A hundred bagger from here and he'll clear commissions!

A thousand bagger and he might be around even!

WOO HOO!!!

[gte_gold]

This is your lucky day. Your 1 share is now valued at $0.51.

[Kuzami]

I have 1 share of P026184, valued at ummmmm zero?

That started out as 800,000 shares of RDWG back in the day, it was hot!

[gte_gold]

How can that be? Maybe a bid/ask ratio greater than 0.14 would help :)

Or, maybe an update from either the President, Director, Secretary or Treasurer explaining the (cough, cough) business strategy.

[Slojab]

Hmmmmm....still no trading.

gte, where are you?

[90 West]

Ok, thanks.

[Slojab]

It'll change Tuesday. Don't worry. ( :

[90 West]

I have 110000 shares, it should go to 11 shares.
But it didnt change. Im just wondering why.

[Slojab]

Things will settle out come Tuesday.

The sp is right, as it closed at .02, but I don't think you're share count was adjusted because at a split adjusted sp of .02 you should be down massively.

[90 West]

My etrade acc. shows .02 my shares didnt change and im up 600%
with $2000 showing. anybody know whats up? I should have 11 shares

[scanc2211]

Beautiful! Welcome aboard! Perhaps I should double my position in ONFID... I know, might be a bit reckless, don't you think? IMO

[Slojab]

Good suggestion.

There. It's done.

Moderators: gte_gold, slojab

[scanc2211]

Haha, just a little. Slojab: you'd be a great moderator on this board. I see there's a need for one. Why don't you volunteer your time and talent?

[Slojab]

Silly question, huh? lol

[scanc2211]

Does it look like my third R/S to you? :)