Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SDNA SEC Suspension for delinquent Financials / Filings:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2015/34-74924.pdf
Order:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2015/34-74924-o.pdf
Admin Proceeding:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2015/34-74925.pdf
SDNA ask buyers, who's complaining? lol
Really like the setup here... more eyes on this and it moves easily...
per last Q
should see .01 no problem IMO...
Nice bidder at .005
Thin.... looks ready for a nice bounce
Oh I don't know......they're making money and filing..seems like SDNA is pretty undervalued here........IMVHFFO .......z
LOL. So my guess is stay far away as possible.
SDNA: SEC Settlement:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2013/lr22593.htm
SDNA coming alive today.
lol..i'll check it out---thx bro
He has and does! Same to you! Anyway, it's short for Raging Bull. Look it up on google. There's a guy named Lenofus that's been on there for years. He gets picked on a lot, but he's a real believer in the company. Hope you get this before they delete it, lol.
still fairly new to this...what is RB?-----nice to have a brother here!
God bless you!!
Craig
Hey Christian Brother, they may, they may. I'm in for a few at .04. Seems like oldtimers liked Vey's recent presentation. I wasn't able to get a chance to listen. You may want to read RB for more updated stuff.
New Customer On-Boarding Processes Pay Big Dividends for Community Banks and Credit Unions
May 18, 2009 9:00:00 AM
Email Story Discuss on ZenoBank
View Additional ProfilesKING OF PRUSSIA, Pa., May 18 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- SEDONA(R) Corporation (OTC Bulletin Board: SDNA) (www.sedonacorp.com), a leading provider of Customer and Member Relationship Management (CRM/MRM) solutions for the financial services market, today announced that the company's bank and credit union customers are seeing up to a 6% increase in new customer retention using SEDONA CRM/SEDONA MRM to automate their new customer on-boarding processes.
A new report from Aite Group, LLC shows that 55% of bank respondents indicate they see growth of deposits as a result of new customer acquisition. In a similar study, 58% of credit union respondents say they are experiencing deposit growth due to new members. In order to help community banks and credit unions retain more of these new customers and members, SEDONA Corporation, this week, introduced a new customer/member on-boarding process exclusively for their SEDONA CRM and SEDONA MRM clients.
Banks and credit unions have long known there is a short "honeymoon period" with new customers or members in which the bank or credit union can secure their financial services relationship. The first few weeks and months of this new relationship have been proven to be critical in determining the lifetime value and profitability of the new customers and members.
SEDONA's on-boarding process proactively drives relevant and timely communications between the financial institution and the customer or member in order to support lasting, growing relationships. SEDONA professionals support the financial institution and guide them through:
-- Defining an on-boarding process for new customers and members.
-- Developing training materials for staff who will use the process.
-- Rolling out the on-boarding process at the institution.
-- Creating measurement reports for calculating the return on the
on-boarding process.
In the first days of the offering, SEDONA Corporation had several requests for the program from clients. "It can take up to six years to recoup the cost of acquiring a new bank customer or credit union member. I am not surprised our clients immediately saw the benefits of the program," commented Matt Keegan, Regional Sales Executive for SEDONA.
According to Connie Thienes, Director of Product Management, Heartland Financial, "We believe the first 180 days of a new relationship is the prime window of opportunity for expanding and solidifying our rapport with a new customer. To manage our on-boarding process manually would be an onerous task. SEDONA CRM simplifies the process, allowing our employees to focus their time on serving our customers rather than on administrative tasks."
Advancial Federal Credit Union also signed up for the new program. Deborah Griesbach, Vice President Marketing & Business Relations for the credit union, commented, "We are seeing an increase in member growth from Louisiana to Alaska, and new member on-boarding allows us to fulfill our mission of anticipating the needs of our members by providing timely, unbiased and intimate financial advice and a full array of technology-enabled products and services that deliver exceptional value."
About SEDONA Corporation
SEDONA(R) Corporation (OTC Bulletin Board: SDNA) helps community banks, regional banks, and credit unions to thrive by enabling their entire organization to effectively identify, acquire, foster and retain loyal, profitable customers and members. SEDONA offers SEDONA CRM(TM) for banks and SEDONA MRM(TM) for credit unions, delivering software, services, and knowledge that provide the foundation for initiatives to improve customer acquisition, customer retention, profitability, referral tracking, cross-selling, sales culture support, marketing and organizational efficiencies, and marketing ROI. For additional information, visit the SEDONA website at www.sedonacorp.com or call 1-800-815-3307.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements made in this news release that relate to future plans, events or performances are forward-looking statements. Any statement containing words such as "believes," "anticipates," "plans," or "expects," and other statements which are not historical facts contained in this release are forward-looking, and these statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on current expectations. Consequently, actual results could differ materially from the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements.
SEDONA(R) and Intarsia(R) are registered trademarks
and SEDONA CRM(TM) and SEDONA MRM(TM) are trademarks of SEDONA Corporation.
All other trade names are the property of their respective owners.
This press release and prior releases are available on the SEDONA Corporation web site at www.sedonacorp.com.
SOURCE SEDONA Corporation
----------------------------------------------
Investors: Anita Primo
investorinfo@sedonacorp.com; or Media: Ginger Gagen
gingerg@sedonacorp.com
both of SEDONA Corporation
+1-610-337-8400
From Survive to Thrive - SEDONA Corporation Exhibits the Benefits of CRM at New England Financial Marketing Association Conference
May 12, 2009 9:00:00 AM
Email Story Discuss on ZenoBank
View Additional ProfilesKING OF PRUSSIA, Pa., May 12 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- SEDONA(R) Corporation (OTC Bulletin Board: SDNA) (www.sedonacorp.com), a leading provider of Customer and Member Relationship Management (CRM/MRM) solutions for the financial services market, today announced the company will participate in the New England Financial Marketing Association Spring Conference, May 14 - May 15, 2009. The conference, appropriately titled Survivor: New England: Stay Relevant and Leverage Affordable Opportunities, will focus on strategies to overcome the marketing challenges community banks face and capitalize on new opportunities presented by the current economic climate. Attendees will learn how SEDONA CRM(TM) can help them not just survive but thrive by:
-- Improving customer retention
-- Enhancing customer acquisition
-- Understanding account, customer and household profitability
-- Identifying profitable cross selling opportunities
-- Supporting their sales organization
-- Expanding marketing efficiencies
-- Increasing marketing ROI
SEDONA will exhibit the benefits CRM can have on sales, marketing and customer service processes. Attendees can request live demonstrations of the SEDONA CRM software and receive updated actionable strategies being utilized by the company's current clients to help them thrive.
About SEDONA Corporation
SEDONA(R) Corporation (OTCBB: SDNA) provides multi-vertical Customer/Member Relationship Management (CRM/MRM) solutions and services specifically tailored to the small to mid-sized financial services market. The SEDONA CRM(TM) solution is designed and priced to support and meet the needs of the multiple lines of business of small to mid-sized banks and credit unions. SEDONA CRM provides the entire financial services institution with a complete and accurate view of their customers' and prospects' relationships and interactions. By utilizing SEDONA's CRM/MRM software and services, SEDONA's clients effectively identify, acquire, foster, and retain loyal, profitable customers. For additional information, visit the SEDONA web site at www.sedonacorp.com or call 1-800-815-3307.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements made in this news release that relate to future plans, events or performances are forward-looking statements. Any statement containing words such as "believes," "anticipates," "plans," or "expects," and other statements which are not historical facts contained in this release are forward-looking, and these statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on current expectations. Consequently, actual results could differ materially from the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements.
SEDONA(R) and Intarsia(R) are registered trademarks and SEDONA CRM(TM) and SEDONA MRM(TM) are trademarks of SEDONA Corporation.
All other trade names are the property of their respective owners.
This press release and prior releases are available on the
SEDONA Corporation web site at www.sedonacorp.com.
SOURCE SEDONA Corporation
----------------------------------------------
Investors
Anita Primo
+1-610-337-8400
investorinfo@sedonacorp.com
or Media
Ginger Gagen
+1-610-337-8400
gingerg@sedonacorp.com
both of SEDONA Corporation
O/s almost maxed, A/S increase soon ?
Nice solid small run occurring right now !!
hello captain!...i rode this little puppy from 70 cents to a buck fifty.....to .18....years ago....used to visit on the phone with david vey , marco , and vicky vey looney....not to mention mike mulshine....and wes christian , their atty.....if vey would not have stepped up to the plate , this company was going bk....i hope they do well....glta
they covered the short with the secondary pipe stock so they are flat and i think a law suit is still out their which is the only reson to own the stock
There are active court cases? Are the court cases directly related to Sedona? If they are could you direct me to some links if possible.
I believe that the problem of illegal naked shorting is significant and threatens the viability of numerous companies that face being snuffed out by the very system that is supposed to protect us.
Thanks in advance.
Never, It was supposed to be so Large, they could not let it be covered as it would have driven the stock to the hundreds.
There are active court cases though and one never knows
I am interested in knowing more about the illegal short position that was associated with this stock. Has the short position ever been resolved? TIA.
Glad I am here alone , Oh well , I am enjoying the move up !!!
.06 in 3 days !
NICE
Nice rise here !! We need some more people !
SDNA coming back to life !!! Volume proceeds price !
Target .25- .30
Sedona Adds PODCASTS for Businesses
http://web2.sedonacorp.com/website/newsroom/pressrelease/2008/040208_.pdf
Was there ever any update on this case ???
I cannot find any info
Does anyone have any updated info on SDNA ?
Maybe this can get back to the .20's or .30's
Showing some life today !!
If they ever made the shorts cover on this one, WOW.
Wonder what ever happened to all these shares !
Hi M7, nice little company and nice chart to boot. Get some volume and she will fly imo. Good luck to you and all.
Monthly chart looks decent too. If it breaks resistance and the full sto moves on above the 50 line, buckle up!
SDNA looks very promising :)
I agree. The MM's will not chance exposing themselves to this twice. Once the shortcovering starts, this will be a rocketship to the moon.
I guess we're the only 2 following it. What I like about this company is VEY...and most recently another individual spending 300k for restricted shares at .19. PLUS, the company is on record for already being scammed by illegal shorters. I don't think they'd do it twice and I don't think Vey and the other guy enjoy throwing money away on a company that has no potential.
Excellent link describing short selling...namely the Sedona infractions by Refco on slides 75-79.
http://www.businessjive.com/nss/darkside.html
Starting to move?
Driven from $10 to 20 cents
A guy named David Vey from Louisiana with $$$ to spare bailed them out and now sits on the board with 40% of the 90,000,000 shares, Brokers heading to J-town over this one.
link to AGM teleconf:
Replays of the call will be available at 1.800.659.1370 (Domestic) or 1.973.474.9504 (International) beginning at approximately 5:00 PM EDT, August 17, 2006 through 11:59 PM EDT on Friday, September 15, 2006.
Legal Wrangling Continues In Case Vs. Ex-Refco Brokers
Wednesday August 9th, 2006 / 0h39
By Judith Burns Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- A case charging former Refco Securities brokers with fraud and market manipulation should proceed because regulators have provided sufficient detail on the charges and evidence of a cover-up, Securities and Exchange Commission lawyers said in a brief filed Friday.
According to the SEC, former Refco brokers Jacob Spinner and Mottes Drillman intentionally beat down prices of shares in Sedona Corp. (SDNA) in 2001 on behalf of client Andreas Badian.
Sedona, a King of Prussia, Pa., software company, had borrowed from Amro International, a Badian client, in a deal that gave Amro the right to convert the debt to stock but barred it from selling Sedona short. (Short selling is the practice of selling borrowed shares in hopes of profiting if the stock price falls.)
Despite the no-short selling agreement, the SEC said Badian had the brokers undertake massive short sales of Sedona stock while the deal was in place, driving down its price by 40%.
Spinner and Drillman are seeking to dismiss the case, filed in federal court in Manhattan, on grounds that the SEC has not provided specific details of wrongdoing on their part.
Marc Ross, a New York attorney who represents Spinner and Drillman, said they are victims of an "over reaching" SEC that is more interested in "media sensation" than justice.
Although the SEC has thousands of hours of tape recordings of the brokers on the job, Ross said it extracted only a few inconclusive out-of-context "sound bytes."
Spinner, for instance, was recorded as saying where illegal acts are called for, "I'm your guy." But his lawyer said the remark was a joke made to Spinner's father-in-law, with Spinner doing his best to sound like Marlon Brando in "The Godfather." All the recording proves, according to Spinner's lawyer: "The guy does a terrible Marlon Brando imitation."
In a motion to dismiss the case, filed in June, Ross said the brokers shouldn't be held responsible for sales they executed on behalf of Badian. Ross also argues the SEC never alleged that the brokers knew of Amro's no-short sale agreement with Sedona, and says the SEC didn't provide facts to support its claim that the brokers knew Badian intended to manipulate Sedona's stock price.
Ross disputes the SEC's allegations that the former Refco brokers sought to cover up massive short sales by marking order tickets as "long" sales and by using "wash" sales and matched buy orders. Ross said the brokers didn't write the order tickets and that at the time, there was no requirement for sell orders to be marked as long or short.
SEC lawyers say the case should go forward, arguing that Spinner and Drillman "played a substantial role in executing manipulative trades" and deliberately mismarked order tickets, or directed their 22-year-old assistant to do the same. After three weeks of short sales, the SEC said Sedona's stock price was slashed from an average of $1.43 to 75-cents a share.
The fact that the brokers were executing trades on behalf of a customer doesn't preclude them from being charged as "primary violators" of federal securities laws, according to the Aug. 4, brief by SEC lawyers. A ruling on Spinner and Drillman's motion to dismiss the case is expected later this summer.
The brokers, who also worked at Pond Securities, aren't the first to be charged in connection with allegedly illegal short selling of Sedona shares.
Thomas Badian, a brother of Andreas Badian, and his firm, Rhino Advisors Inc., agreed to a $1 million settlement with the SEC in March 2003 without admitting or denying the agency's fraud charges. A criminal complaint unsealed in December 2003 charging the two brothers with conspiracy to commit securities fraud was later dismissed against Andreas Badian, but is still pending against Thomas Badian, now a fugitive.
Refco Inc. (RFXCQ), parent of the securities unit, filed for bankruptcy last fall after revealing a $430 million debt in a subsidiary controlled by former chief executive Phillip Bennett. Refco, which went public last August, saw its shares fall from more than $30 to less than $1.
Sedona shares closed at 18 cents Tuesday.
-By Judith Burns, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6692; judith.burns@dowjones.com
Wednesday August 9th, 2006 / 0h39
Thanks NY-Bob...
Later, The Team.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Executives turn to odd tactic to fight shorts
Wednesday, August 02, 2006
By Kara Scannell, The Wall Street Journal
Some executives are reaching for an odd tactic in an expanding battle against short sellers, who profit when share prices fall.
The executives -- at smaller companies that often don't trade on big exchanges -- are pushing shareholders to lock away their physical stock certificates so the short sellers can't get their hands on the shares.
Stock trading rarely involves the actual exchange of physical stock certificates anymore, because Wall Street trades and tracks most stocks electronically. But in a perhaps quixotic effort, the executives hope they can short-circuit the short sellers by rounding up stock certificates and taking them out of the electronic loop.
Short sellers borrow shares and sell them, hoping the share price will fall, allowing them to profit by replacing the borrowed shares with less costly ones bought later. The activity is legal, and many investors and scholars argue it helps share prices to adjust to changes in a company's outlook.
But a number of executives -- at companies like Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd., a Canadian insurance company, and Overstock.com Inc., a U.S. Internet company -- argue short sellers are manipulating their shares. They are challenging the shorts with lawsuits, private investigations and publicity campaigns.
Few companies have been able to prove improper trading, but the stock-certificate effort is a sign the battle between short sellers and aggrieved executives is widening. By getting shareholders to take physical possession of their stock, the executives hope, brokers won't be able to lend the shares out to short sellers.
"The problem is shorting has gotten to be so popular that there's no accountability," says Wes Christian, a partner at Christian, Smith & Jewell LLP, a Houston law firm that says it is working for 20 companies -- including Overstock and Sedona Corp. -- against short sellers.
Peter Fiorillo, founder of Rx Processing Corp., a Tampa, Fla., provider of laboratory tests, says he became suspicious about activity in his company's shares in February, when 85,000 Rx shares traded at 0.0001 cent, well below the one cent where it had been trading. He suspected short sellers were involved.
"You see somebody print 0.0001, and you know that they're not real trades," he says. The shares trade as pink sheets, part of an unregulated stock-quote service populated by many small companies, and don't change hands on an exchange like the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq.
The following month, he issued a news release recommending shareholders of Rx Processing ask their brokers to deliver physical certificates. "This action limits interbrokerage borrowing and market manipulation," he said in the release.
Company executives complain that some traders sell borrowed shares that don't even exist, a practice known as naked short selling, which is typically illegal. These executives argue that if short sellers can't find stock to borrow and sell, it will be harder for them to short the shares.
Moreover, if fewer shares are in the hands of brokers to lend out, some short sellers might be forced to return borrowed shares, relieving downward pressure on share prices.
James Angel, an associate professor of finance at Georgetown University in Washington, calls the executives' efforts a fruitless attempt to "go back to the early 20th century." Mr. Angel says chief executives blame short sellers, when in fact short sellers are often first to identify companies with problems.
"Much the same as when the hyenas are targeting a pack of zebras," he says, "they're likely going to get the weak ones."
It isn't clear just how many executives are asking shareholders to go paper. It is even less clear how many are succeeding.
At Rx Processing, fewer than 15 stockholders followed the CEO's advice and requested certificates. That amounted to about 500,000 shares, less than 6 percent of the nine million shares outstanding.
Mr. Fiorillo says he is unlikely to push the effort further. Now, he hopes to leave the murky over-the-counter market by going private, reorganizing and trying for a Nasdaq listing that would bring more market surveillance.
Holding physical shares can be costly. Investors often have to pay a brokerage as much as $25 to receive a paper certificate. The Securities Industry Association, Wall Street's main lobbying group, has tried to get rid of paper certificates for years, estimating it costs the industry more than $250 million.
Most companies involved in the current campaign have risky, thinly traded penny stocks not listed on the NYSE or Nasdaq. These companies often don't meet corporate-governance standards or financial requirements to trade on the big exchanges.
Some of these companies have tried to grab control of their shares by offering stock or cash dividends that require a shareholder to redeem their securities to get a new class of stock or cash dividend.
Riverbank Investment Corp., a small Wilmington, Del. broker, announced a cash dividend last month hoping to "trigger a short-squeeze forcing naked shorting to be covered," it said in a news release. Primeholdings.com Inc., a Salt Lake City holding company for Internet businesses, said last fall it planned to issue a stock dividend for the same reason.
Philip Verges, chief executive of communications company NewMarket Technology Inc. suspected two years ago that naked short sellers drove his company's stock price lower on the OTC Bulletin Board and urged investors to demand stock certificates. "Do not take no for an answer," he wrote in a letter to shareholders.
Yet only a handful of NewMarket shareholders responded, and the company abandoned the effort. "We started thinking it was not going to help," said Rick Lutz, head of investor relations for NewMarket.
The company has applied for a listing on the American Stock Exchange. It is awaiting approval.
To 'Teamlasvegas' on 'Sedona Corporation' -
and To 'Bad cuda' on 'UBS AG (UBS:NYSE) ' -
well, its a bit more nss info on the below link -
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=12901975
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=4887
CHECK THIS!!! UBS to hand over the information in ten days.
Louisiana State Attorney General Charles Foti is trying
to force UBS, the Wall Street investment bank, to turn over vast quantities of information on its trading, stock lending and other activities related to shares of software firm
Sedona -
The Louisiana Department of Justice filed documents in a state court Tuesday to compel UBS to hand over the information in ten days.
The state is probing naked short-selling, which is the practice of selling shares short without borrowing them. It is an issue that has already been raised in reference to Sedona Sedona. in an ongoing civil lawsuit against a number of brokers and hedge funds and in a Securities and Exchange Commission federal court case filed in April in New York against one brokerage and several individuals.
Several other states, including Illinois and Connecticut, are said to be looking into the issue. Possible abuses in stock trading and in the stock-lending business, which brings in $10 billion in annual profit for Wall Street firms, has started to attract the attention of federal regulators as well.
Foti's exhaustive list of demands for documents include all of UBS' electronic and paper communications files relating to Sedona stock, its trading records, monthly stock inventories, stock loan documentation, information regarding commission payments, customer account records and research done in house related to Sedona.
He also wants information related to the bank's market-making activities and its clearing and settlement procedures.
Louisiana is home to approximately 100 shareholders in Sedona, a Pennsylvania software company whose stock has been pummeled in the last six years, it contends because of manipulative short-selling by hedge funds and collusive brokers. Shares started out January 2000 at $10.25 and are now trading on the pink sheets at 20 cents.
Among these Louisiana-based shareholders is David Vey, a wealthy real estate developer who provided rescue financing to Sedona in 2003, joined its board and now owns about 44% of its outstanding shares.
Wes Christian, a Houston lawyer representing Sedona in a four-year-old civil suit against brokerage firms and hedge funds, says, "We are gaining momentum, finally."
It would be Louisiana's second demand for information from UBS. In September 2003, the state issued a subpoena seeking information on failed deliveries of Sedona shares in trades handled by UBS.
A spokesman for UBS had no immediate comment.
Lawyers who have defended Wall Street firms against naked short-selling allegations say the problem is overblown and that companies that complain about manipulation are generally weak and looking to blame financial problems on outsiders.
Still, that hasn't stopped many states and even Canada from investigating the allegations. Utah's state legislature went so far as to pass a law that would impose stiff penalties on brokers that didn't promptly report trade settlement failures to the state's securities division. After an intense behind-the-scenes Wall Street industry lobbying effort this summer, however, the governor relented and agreed not to enforce the law until next June.
"It seems like every jurisdiction wants to get in on naked short-selling," says Perrie Weiner, an attorney who has represented Wall Street against the naked short-selling crusaders.
In April, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil lawsuit against broker Pond Securities and several individuals. The SEC suit, filed in New York federal court, says the brokers aided or failed to prevent a short-selling scheme carried out for Rhino Advisors, a now-defunct New York money management firm. Rhino is accused of setting up the scheme with one of its hedge fund clients, Amro International, to profit from a 2001 private placement in Sedona.
It is one of the so-called private investment in public equity, or PIPE, transactions regulators have been examining for illegal trading activity.
Three years ago, the then-president of Rhino Advisors, Thomas Badian, settled SEC charges of using offshore accounts to short shares of Sedona. He and the firm paid $1 million.
The SEC contends in its most recent case that Thomas Badian's brother, Andreas Badian, an official at Rhino, directed three brokers who were affiliated with Refco Securities, (two of them were also affiliated with another brokerage that was named in the case) to sell short massive amounts of Sedona shares with "unbridled levels of aggression," intending to "clobber" Sedona's stock price until it collapsed.
During March 2001, Badian's scheme to organize short-selling in Sedona represented 40% of the stock's trading volume for the month, the SEC contends, and the stock dropped from $1.43 to 75 cents. The shares were being sold short for Amro without borrowing them.
Sedona was founded in 1987 as a maker of image scanners. But nine years later it acquired database management software from Lockheed Martin and started selling the technology under license to small banks, to help them manage their customer accounts.
Rhino Investors, representing Amro and others, pumped $2.5 million into Sedona in November 2000 by way of a convertible debt offering, which is a bond that converts to shares at a designated point. Before the Internet bubble burst, such deals were a common way for small tech companies to raise capital without issuing a lot of potentially dilutive shares. They have since been criticized as desperate maneuvers by desperate companies--what is known as a "death spiral convertible."
The Amro agreement was arranged so that it would get more shares of Sedona on the conversion date if Sedona shares dropped in the period leading up to it. Sedona made the investors agree not to sell short the shares.
The company began to notice a pattern of heavy selling volume in its shares coinciding with positive news of new software sales, including two alliances with IBM announced in late 2000 and early 2001.
Its shares continued to fall and the company faced a cash crisis in late 2002 that prevented it from making payroll for nine weeks.
Its employees remained loyal, however, and CEO Marco Emrich reached out to investors for help. A Louisiana businessman named David Vey stepped in with an initial $1.4 million in convertible debt financing. He pumped more money into the company in 2003 and 2004, also in the form of convertible debt.
Vey now owns 43.7% of Sedona shares and is its biggest shareholder, according to the company's proxy. He is chairman of the board, along with his sister, Victoria Looney, a Louisiana businesswoman who owns less than 1% of the company's shares.
A spokeswoman for Sedona was not available.
--
Note: UBS Securities LLC (UBSS) is the second largest trader of Unico shares after NITE KNIGHT EQUITY MARKETS, L.P.
UBSS UBS Securities LLC (UBSS)
July Volume 301,458,595
Rank 1
% 42
June Volume 451,525,569
Rank 1
% 37
Year to Date Volume 6,556,431,726
Rank 2
% 26
NITE KNIGHT EQUITY MARKETS, L.P.
July Volume 273,390,498
Rank 2
% 38
June Volume 339,174,714
Rank 2
% 28
Year to Date Volume 10,925,843,565
Rank 1
% 44
short squeeze coming up soon ?
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=6582
Posted by: Matt55 -
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13038505
*My opinion is not to be taken as an advice for buying or selling stocks - Do your own DD - Tia.
UBS - NEWS - RE: illegal naked short-selling -
Louisiana State Attorney General Charles Foti is trying
to force UBS, the Wall Street investment bank, to turn over
vast quantities of information on its trading, stock lending
and other activities related to shares of software firm
Sedona -
The Louisiana Department of Justice filed documents in a state court Tuesday to compel UBS to hand over the information in ten days.
The state is probing naked short-selling, which is the practice of selling shares short without borrowing them. It is an issue that has already been raised in reference to Sedona Sedona (otcbb: SDNA - news - people ). in an ongoing civil lawsuit against a number of brokers and hedge funds and in a Securities and Exchange Commission federal court case filed in April in New York against one brokerage and several individuals.
Several other states, including Illinois and Connecticut, are said to be looking into the issue. Possible abuses in stock trading and in the stock-lending business, which brings in $10 billion in annual profit for Wall Street firms, has started to attract the attention of federal regulators as well.
Foti's exhaustive list of demands for documents include all of UBS' electronic and paper communications files relating to Sedona stock, its trading records, monthly stock inventories, stock loan documentation, information regarding commission payments, customer account records and research done in house related to Sedona.
He also wants information related to the bank's market-making activities and its clearing and settlement procedures.
Louisiana is home to approximately 100 shareholders in Sedona, a Pennsylvania software company whose stock has been pummeled in the last six years, it contends because of manipulative short-selling by hedge funds and collusive brokers. Shares started out January 2000 at $10.25 and are now trading on the pink sheets at 20 cents.
Among these Louisiana-based shareholders is David Vey, a wealthy real estate developer who provided rescue financing to Sedona in 2003, joined its board and now owns about 44% of its outstanding shares.
Wes Christian, a Houston lawyer representing Sedona in a four-year-old civil suit against brokerage firms and hedge funds, says, "We are gaining momentum, finally."
It would be Louisiana's second demand for information from UBS. In September 2003, the state issued a subpoena seeking information on failed deliveries of Sedona shares in trades handled by UBS.
A spokesman for UBS had no immediate comment.
Lawyers who have defended Wall Street firms against naked short-selling allegations say the problem is overblown and that companies that complain about manipulation are generally weak and looking to blame financial problems on outsiders.
Still, that hasn't stopped many states and even Canada from investigating the allegations. Utah's state legislature went so far as to pass a law that would impose stiff penalties on brokers that didn't promptly report trade settlement failures to the state's securities division. After an intense behind-the-scenes Wall Street industry lobbying effort this summer, however, the governor relented and agreed not to enforce the law until next June.
"It seems like every jurisdiction wants to get in on naked short-selling," says Perrie Weiner, an attorney who has represented Wall Street against the naked short-selling crusaders.
In April, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil lawsuit against broker Pond Securities and several individuals. The SEC suit, filed in New York federal court, says the brokers aided or failed to prevent a short-selling scheme carried out for Rhino Advisors, a now-defunct New York money management firm. Rhino is accused of setting up the scheme with one of its hedge fund clients, Amro International, to profit from a 2001 private placement in Sedona.
It is one of the so-called private investment in public equity, or PIPE, transactions regulators have been examining for illegal trading activity.
Three years ago, the then-president of Rhino Advisors, Thomas Badian, settled SEC charges of using offshore accounts to short shares of Sedona. He and the firm paid $1 million.
The SEC contends in its most recent case that Thomas Badian's brother, Andreas Badian, an official at Rhino, directed three brokers who were affiliated with Refco Securities, (two of them were also affiliated with another brokerage that was named in the case) to sell short massive amounts of Sedona shares with "unbridled levels of aggression," intending to "clobber" Sedona's stock price until it collapsed.
During March 2001, Badian's scheme to organize short-selling in Sedona represented 40% of the stock's trading volume for the month, the SEC contends, and the stock dropped from $1.43 to 75 cents. The shares were being sold short for Amro without borrowing them.
Sedona was founded in 1987 as a maker of image scanners. But nine years later it acquired database management software from Lockheed Martin (nyse: LMT - news - people ) and started selling the technology under license to small banks, to help them manage their customer accounts.
Rhino Investors, representing Amro and others, pumped $2.5 million into Sedona in November 2000 by way of a convertible debt offering, which is a bond that converts to shares at a designated point. Before the Internet bubble burst, such deals were a common way for small tech companies to raise capital without issuing a lot of potentially dilutive shares. They have since been criticized as desperate maneuvers by desperate companies--what is known as a "death spiral convertible."
The Amro agreement was arranged so that it would get more shares of Sedona on the conversion date if Sedona shares dropped in the period leading up to it. Sedona made the investors agree not to sell short the shares.
The company began to notice a pattern of heavy selling volume in its shares coinciding with positive news of new software sales, including two alliances with IBM (nyse: IBM - news - people ) announced in late 2000 and early 2001.
Its shares continued to fall and the company faced a cash crisis in late 2002 that prevented it from making payroll for nine weeks.
Its employees remained loyal, however, and CEO Marco Emrich reached out to investors for help. A Louisiana businessman named David Vey stepped in with an initial $1.4 million in convertible debt financing. He pumped more money into the company in 2003 and 2004, also in the form of convertible debt.
Vey now owns 43.7% of Sedona shares and is its biggest shareholder, according to the company's proxy. He is chairman of the board, along with his sister, Victoria Looney, a Louisiana businesswoman who owns less than 1% of the company's shares.
A spokeswoman for Sedona was not available -
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=6663
Posted by: GOLDENBOLLOX
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13038179
8/29/06 Naked Justice? by Liz Moyer, 08.29.06, 3:40 PM ET
http://www.forbes.com/business/2006/08/29/naked-shorts-sedona-louisiana-cx_lm_0829naked.html
Louisiana State Attorney General Charles Foti is trying to force UBS, the Wall Street investment bank, to turn over vast quantities of information on its trading, stock lending and other activities related to shares of software firm Sedona.
The Louisiana Department of Justice filed documents in a state court Tuesday to compel UBS to hand over the information in ten days.
The state is probing naked short-selling, which is the practice of selling shares short without borrowing them. It is an issue that has already been raised in reference to Sedona in an ongoing civil lawsuit against a number of brokers and hedge funds and in a Securities and Exchange Commission federal court case filed in April in New York against one brokerage and several individuals.
Several other states, including Illinois and Connecticut, are said to be looking into the issue. Possible abuses in stock trading and in the stock-lending business, which brings in $10 billion in annual profit for Wall Street firms, has started to attract the attention of federal regulators as well.
Foti's exhaustive list of demands for documents include all of UBS' electronic and paper communications files relating to Sedona stock, its trading records, monthly stock inventories, stock loan documentation, information regarding commission payments, customer account records and research done in house related to Sedona.
He also wants information related to the bank's market-making activities and its clearing and settlement procedures.
Louisiana is home to approximately 100 shareholders in Sedona, a Pennsylvania software company whose stock has been pummeled in the last six years, it contends because of manipulative short-selling by hedge funds and collusive brokers. Shares started out January 2000 at $10.25 and are now trading on the pink sheets at 20 cents.
Among these Louisiana-based shareholders is David Vey, a wealthy real estate developer who provided rescue financing to Sedona in 2003, joined its board and now owns about 44% of its outstanding shares.
Wes Christian, a Houston lawyer representing Sedona in a four-year-old civil suit against brokerage firms and hedge funds, says, "We are gaining momentum, finally."
It would be Louisiana's second demand for information from UBS. In September 2003, the state issued a subpoena seeking information on failed deliveries of Sedona shares in trades handled by UBS.
A spokesman for UBS had no immediate comment.
Lawyers who have defended Wall Street firms against naked short-selling allegations say the problem is overblown and that companies that complain about manipulation are generally weak and looking to blame financial problems on outsiders.
Still, that hasn't stopped many states and even Canada from investigating the allegations. Utah's state legislature went so far as to pass a law that would impose stiff penalties on brokers that didn't promptly report trade settlement failures to the state's securities division. After an intense behind-the-scenes Wall Street industry lobbying effort this summer, however, the governor relented and agreed not to enforce the law until next June.
"It seems like every jurisdiction wants to get in on naked short-selling," says Perrie Weiner, an attorney who has represented Wall Street against the naked short-selling crusaders.
In April, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil lawsuit against broker Pond Securities and several individuals. The SEC suit, filed in New York federal court, says the brokers aided or failed to prevent a short-selling scheme carried out for Rhino Advisors, a now-defunct New York money management firm. Rhino is accused of setting up the scheme with one of its hedge fund clients, Amro International, to profit from a 2001 private placement in Sedona.
It is one of the so-called private investment in public equity, or PIPE, transactions regulators have been examining for illegal trading activity.
Three years ago, the then-president of Rhino Advisors, Thomas Badian, settled SEC charges of using offshore accounts to short shares of Sedona. He and the firm paid $1 million.
The SEC contends in its most recent case that Thomas Badian's brother, Andreas Badian, an official at Rhino, directed three brokers who were affiliated with Refco Securities, (two of them were also affiliated with another brokerage that was named in the case) to sell short massive amounts of Sedona shares with "unbridled levels of aggression," intending to "clobber" Sedona's stock price until it collapsed.
During March 2001, Badian's scheme to organize short-selling in Sedona represented 40% of the stock's trading volume for the month, the SEC contends, and the stock dropped from $1.43 to 75 cents. The shares were being sold short for Amro without borrowing them.
Sedona was founded in 1987 as a maker of image scanners. But nine years later it acquired database management software from Lockheed Martin (nyse: LMT - news - people ) and started selling the technology under license to small banks, to help them manage their customer accounts.
Rhino Investors, representing Amro and others, pumped $2.5 million into Sedona in November 2000 by way of a convertible debt offering, which is a bond that converts to shares at a designated point. Before the Internet bubble burst, such deals were a common way for small tech companies to raise capital without issuing a lot of potentially dilutive shares. They have since been criticized as desperate maneuvers by desperate companies--what is known as a "death spiral convertible."
The Amro agreement was arranged so that it would get more shares of Sedona on the conversion date if Sedona shares dropped in the period leading up to it. Sedona made the investors agree not to sell short the shares.
The company began to notice a pattern of heavy selling volume in its shares coinciding with positive news of new software sales, including two alliances with IBM (nyse: IBM - news - people ) announced in late 2000 and early 2001.
Its shares continued to fall and the company faced a cash crisis in late 2002 that prevented it from making payroll for nine weeks.
Its employees remained loyal, however, and CEO Marco Emrich reached out to investors for help. A Louisiana businessman named David Vey stepped in with an initial $1.4 million in convertible debt financing. He pumped more money into the company in 2003 and 2004, also in the form of convertible debt.
Vey now owns 43.7% of Sedona shares and is its biggest shareholder, according to the company's proxy. He is chairman of the board, along with his sister, Victoria Looney, a Louisiana businesswoman who owns less than 1% of the company's shares.
A spokeswoman for Sedona was not available.
Followers
|
5
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
56
|
Created
|
04/13/04
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |