Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The U.S. needs to adopt the Canadian reporting rules. Everyone has to report, period.
Hopefully the SEC will shut down the entire otcbb/pk market.
i love the lovely shot of Mrs. Shrek there
she looks like a strong lass doesn't she.
thanks for the article.
May want to change the name of the board to SEC targeting penny stock touts/promoters as this looks to be just the start of it.
The stock promoters are getting spanked.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 21591 / July 9, 2010
Securities and Exchange Commission v. InvestSource, Inc. and Songkram Roy Sahachaisere, United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. SACV 10-1041 DOC (RNBx) (filed July 9, 2010).
SEC CHARGES HUNTINGTON BEACH-BASED STOCK PROMOTER WITH FRAUD
The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed a civil action against a Huntington Beach-based penny stock promoter, Songkram Roy Sahachaisere, and his company, InvestSource, Inc. for committing fraud while promoting stock of their clients through massive email campaigns.
In its complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the SEC alleges that Sahachaisere, age 40, and InvestSource provide "investor relations services" by touting various penny stocks in its daily email newsletter, called the "Daily Digest," and by posting company profiles on its website. From January 2008 to March 2009, defendants sent nearly 450 email messages publicizing these penny stocks to over 24 million recipients, receiving clients' stock as compensation. The complaint focuses on seven specific penny stocks that defendants touted in which, the SEC alleges, defendants made misleading statements regarding the nature of their compensation on InvestSource's website and in the promotional emails. The defendants also failed to disclose that they were selling the very securities they were recommending investors buy. According to the complaint, between April 2008 and March 2009, defendants sold over 5 million shares of these seven clients through one or more of their approximately 36 brokerage accounts, illegally reaping profits of at least $276,000.
The SEC's complaint charges InvestSource and Sahachaisere with violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. It also charges them with violating the antitouting provisions contained in Section 17(b) of the Securities Act. The SEC's complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and civil monetary penalties against both defendants. In addition, the SEC seeks penny stock and officer and director bars against defendant Sahachaisere.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2010/lr21591.htm
The SEC complaint
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2010/comp21591.pdf
Promoters beware, the SEC looks to be in full on attack mode.
agreed, here's to hoping the SEC can nail a bunch of the paid promoters from here...whether they post their compensated awareness nonsense or not, i think it's a scummy process
It really seems as if many of the promotional companies on the SEC radar are located in Canada. I am guessing the majority of the hurdles in prosecuting these companies was based on the fact that they were operating out of reach of the SEC. The recent agreement with Canadian regulators is definitely due to multiple cases as opposed to one and it allows the SEC easier access to these companies.
I am hopeful that more cases are in the near future.
here's a few more pics and tales of the PSC couple...
http://www.timothysykes.com/2010/06/how-mr-mrs-pennystockchaser-spent-their-alleged-24-million-ill-gotten-profits-photos/
i love the lovely shot of Mrs. Shrek there
one can only hope the SEC cracks down on ALL of the scumbucket paid promoters on here
looks like a who's who of what gets humped on IHUB daily
love this post...reminds me of IHUB
PSC is a Joke
I give them 5 points for entertainment because its fun watching them promote a stock and then it dropping 70% and they saying they are "pissed" or they were tricked etc etc.
I agree with every review on them so far so there isnt much else to say. They are scamming stock promoters that front load a stock, release the pick, and dump it when it turns. The stock usually drops lower in PPS than what it was before.
Now they got burned a few times and are saying they will start releasing short-sell picks?
Hahaha that is hilarious...they have been releasing them all along. Just short sell their pick once it starts dropping! Guaranteed gains!
Overall Rating
Education
Entertainment
Value
2 of 2 people have found this review helpful.
Permalink
Was this review helpful? Yes No
This review is the subjective opinion of an Investimonials.com member and not of Investimonials LLC.
Comments on this Review
Leave a Comment
for sure, but they were in the public domain.
what else does the average investor have access to?
cant trust their disclaimers
Quite a List!!! Thank You.
From the HRRN board where PSC got paid with 20 million free trading shares.
Posted by: stocklock Date: Friday, July 09, 2010 10:05:52 AM
In reply to: EarnestDD who wrote msg# 3225 Post # of 3226
yea, your right, all the account of PSC and his wife have been ceased and froze ( one of the account had 3 000 000 $ in it ) and all the US broker are being investigate for traces of PSC activities. but i also heard that he paid a 2 800 000$ fine and he is back on track... but for sure PSC will be hit again but HRRN cant be find nowhere in the investigation ( well for now) it is other companies that are in trouble...
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=52112244
this was from around the end of may.
#msg-51869075
"PennyStockChaser.com has been compensated by the following companies for their profile:
SOCI: 700,000 shares free trading by Third Party
PPTO: 1,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
HYGN: 13, 000, 000 shares free trading by Third Party
CVRG: 7,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
USCN: 400, 000 shares free trading by Third Party
UPTR: $100,000 by Third Party for Two Weeks
ILVC: 921,000 shares free trading by Third Party
CGAQ: 1,000.000 shares free trading by Third Party
CTHP: $100,000 by Third Party for Two Weeks
TAMO:$50,000 by Third Party for One Week
QURI: 5,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
XYNH: 30,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
EVRN: 4,500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
BEHL: 50,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
C35: 5,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
MTRO: 250,000 shares free trading by Third Party
COYN: 500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
DUTV:1,200,000 shares free trading by Third Party
NVSR:3,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
HRRN:20,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
AWSL:140,000 shares free trading by Third Party
AVOE: 500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
ZENG: 3,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
BLVI: $50,000 by Third Party for One Day
OPSY: 2,800,000 shares free trading by Third Party
XCEL: $150,000 by Third Party for One Month
STZU: 500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
IFUS: 5,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
TTEG: 400, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MHYS: 500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
NGHI: $100,000 by Third Party for Two Days
BLVI: 2,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
EGOH: 350, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MRIB: 1,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
VRED: 20,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
APDN: 800,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MDGC: $150,000 by Third Party for One Month
WDAS: $80,000 by Third Party for One Month
OPXS: 300, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
PLMO: 350, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MEVT: 350, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
LWSP: 375, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
HDUP: 550, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
PNTV: $50,000 by Third Party for One Week
RGTX: 500, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
BRYN: 1,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
DRGZ: $75,000 by Third Party for One Week
LUXE: $75,000 by Third Party for One Week
CLNP: 500,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
VGPR: 6,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
DOLV: $80,000 by Third Party for One Week
VGPR: 19,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
KNDR: 2,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
PGCX: 250, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
UTRM: 500, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
EVII: $75,000 by Third Party for Two Weeks
BOCL: $75,000 by Third Party for Two Weeks
ENTK: 400, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
PMAH: 200, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
HRAL: 2, 500, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
WBRE: $75,000 by Third Party for One Week
HSCO: 380, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
RVBF: $50,000 by Third Party for One Week
ALTO: 400, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
AGCZ: 400, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
GDHI: 100, 000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MXGD: 1, 000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
BYSD: 200, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
DGRI: 1,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
EXPU: 2,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
HYII: 8,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MYSL: 300, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
WDRP: 10,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
AMCG: $400, 000 by Third Party for One Month
PPII: 400, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
IKTO: 300, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
SMLK: 600, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
BONZ: $50, 000 by Third Party for One Day
EVPH: 500, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
WMBI: 1,100, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
FVSTA: 1,400,000 shares free trading by Third Party
LHPT:15,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
CCGC: 1,500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
BLEW: Purchased $100,000 of stock through Third Party Investor
VIVK: 1,7 000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
ZLUS: 80, 000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
SWRS: 6, 000,000 shares free trading by Third Party"
EVII (was HYBR, now LMCO): Interesting. "QualityStocks" got paid nearly $750,000 cash to promote that stock as HYBR.
And Ryan et al got a chunck of cash too, later, after a reverse split, when it was EVII:
EVII: $75,000 by Third Party for Two Weeks This is PSC disclaimer. When paid? By whom? Doesn't say
---
This is when it was EVII:
Posted by: laurap
Date: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 7:38:35 PM
#msg-43206742
Compensation: Research driven investor - none
DUBAI PENNY STOCK - twenty-five thousand dollars for a one w eek
Penny Stock Explosions - We have been compensated twenty-five thousand dollars for a one week investor awareness campaign on EVII by a third party
24-7 Stock Alert - We have been compensated twenty-five thousand dollars for a one month EVII investor awareness campaign by a third party.
---
When it was HYBR, Quality Stocks got at least $750,000 to promote it, if I remember right. Somebody has spread a lot of money around for this stock (through several reverse splits) for at least 3 years that I have been keeping up with it:
Posted by: petermic
Date: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 3:57:50 PM
In reply to: QualityStocks
#msg-30577866
http://www.qualitystocks.net/disclaimer.php
HYBR: QualityStocks received $187,424 from a third party for 90 days of services and received $473,497.00 from HYBR for 90 days of services.
Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:36:26 PM
In reply to: sherwood37 who wrote msg# 2327 Post # of 12355
#msg-46714749
PennyStockChaser.com has been compensated by the following companies for their profile:
SOCI: 700,000 shares free trading by Third Party
PPTO: 1,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
HYGN: 13, 000, 000 shares free trading by Third Party
CVRG: 7,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
USCN: 400, 000 shares free trading by Third Party
UPTR: $100,000 by Third Party for Two Weeks
ILVC: 921,000 shares free trading by Third Party
CGAQ: 1,000.000 shares free trading by Third Party
CTHP: $100,000 by Third Party for Two Weeks
TAMO:$50,000 by Third Party for One Week
QURI: 5,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
XYNH: 30,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
EVRN: 4,500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
BEHL: 50,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
C35: 5,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
MTRO: 250,000 shares free trading by Third Party
COYN: 500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
DUTV:1,200,000 shares free trading by Third Party
NVSR:3,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
HRRN:20,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
AWSL:140,000 shares free trading by Third Party
AVOE: 500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
ZENG: 3,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
BLVI: $50,000 by Third Party for One Day
OPSY: 2,800,000 shares free trading by Third Party
XCEL: $150,000 by Third Party for One Month
STZU: 500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
IFUS: 5,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
TTEG: 400, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MHYS: 500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
NGHI: $100,000 by Third Party for Two Days
BLVI: 2,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
EGOH: 350, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MRIB: 1,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
VRED: 20,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
APDN: 800,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MDGC: $150,000 by Third Party for One Month
WDAS: $80,000 by Third Party for One Month
OPXS: 300, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
PLMO: 350, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MEVT: 350, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
LWSP: 375, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
HDUP: 550, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
PNTV: $50,000 by Third Party for One Week
RGTX: 500, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
BRYN: 1,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
DRGZ: $75,000 by Third Party for One Week
LUXE: $75,000 by Third Party for One Week
CLNP: 500,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
VGPR: 6,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
DOLV: $80,000 by Third Party for One Week
VGPR: 19,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
KNDR: 2,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
PGCX: 250, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
UTRM: 500, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
EVII: $75,000 by Third Party for Two Weeks
BOCL: $75,000 by Third Party for Two Weeks
ENTK: 400, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
PMAH: 200, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
HRAL: 2, 500, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
WBRE: $75,000 by Third Party for One Week
HSCO: 380, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
RVBF: $50,000 by Third Party for One Week
ALTO: 400, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
AGCZ: 400, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
GDHI: 100, 000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MXGD: 1, 000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
BYSD: 200, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
DGRI: 1,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
EXPU: 2,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
HYII: 8,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MYSL: 300, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
WDRP: 10,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
AMCG: $300, 000 by Third Party for One Month
WDAS: I noticed they got $80,000 for that stock. Not shares. That's interesting.
I bet that cash was spread around pretty good.
thanks for the lead.
i'll look around iHub and see if it's archived here, too.
did you notice every disclaimer has an anonymous third party?
that's not 17(b) compliant.
also, no dates. not compliant with 17(b), either.
from pennystockchaser.com/disclaimer/
"PennyStockChaser.com has been compensated by the following companies for their profile:
SOCI: 700,000 shares free trading by Third Party
PPTO: 1,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
HYGN: 13, 000, 000 shares free trading by Third Party
CVRG: 7,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
USCN: 400, 000 shares free trading by Third Party
UPTR: $100,000 by Third Party for Two Weeks
ILVC: 921,000 shares free trading by Third Party
CGAQ: 1,000.000 shares free trading by Third Party
CTHP: $100,000 by Third Party for Two Weeks
TAMO:$50,000 by Third Party for One Week
QURI: 5,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
XYNH: 30,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
EVRN: 4,500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
BEHL: 50,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
C35: 5,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
MTRO: 250,000 shares free trading by Third Party
COYN: 500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
DUTV:1,200,000 shares free trading by Third Party
NVSR:3,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
HRRN:20,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
AWSL:140,000 shares free trading by Third Party
AVOE: 500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
ZENG: 3,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
BLVI: $50,000 by Third Party for One Day
OPSY: 2,800,000 shares free trading by Third Party
XCEL: $150,000 by Third Party for One Month
STZU: 500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
IFUS: 5,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
TTEG: 400, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MHYS: 500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
NGHI: $100,000 by Third Party for Two Days
BLVI: 2,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
EGOH: 350, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MRIB: 1,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
VRED: 20,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
APDN: 800,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MDGC: $150,000 by Third Party for One Month
WDAS: $80,000 by Third Party for One Month
OPXS: 300, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
PLMO: 350, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MEVT: 350, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
LWSP: 375, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
HDUP: 550, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
PNTV: $50,000 by Third Party for One Week
RGTX: 500, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
BRYN: 1,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
DRGZ: $75,000 by Third Party for One Week
LUXE: $75,000 by Third Party for One Week
CLNP: 500,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
VGPR: 6,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
DOLV: $80,000 by Third Party for One Week
VGPR: 19,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
KNDR: 2,000,000 shares free Trading by Third Party
PGCX: 250, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
UTRM: 500, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
EVII: $75,000 by Third Party for Two Weeks
BOCL: $75,000 by Third Party for Two Weeks
ENTK: 400, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
PMAH: 200, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
HRAL: 2, 500, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
WBRE: $75,000 by Third Party for One Week
HSCO: 380, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
RVBF: $50,000 by Third Party for One Week
ALTO: 400, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
AGCZ: 400, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
GDHI: 100, 000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MXGD: 1, 000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
BYSD: 200, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
DGRI: 1,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
EXPU: 2,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
HYII: 8,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
MYSL: 300, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
WDRP: 10,000, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
AMCG: $400, 000 by Third Party for One Month
PPII: 400, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
IKTO: 300, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
SMLK: 600, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
BONZ: $50, 000 by Third Party for One Day
EVPH: 500, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
WMBI: 1,100, 000 shares free Trading by Third Party
FVSTA: 1,400,000 shares free trading by Third Party
LHPT:15,000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
CCGC: 1,500,000 shares free trading by Third Party
BLEW: Purchased $100,000 of stock through Third Party Investor
VIVK: 1,7 000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
ZLUS: 80, 000,000 shares free trading by Third Party
SWRS: 6, 000,000 shares free trading by Third Party"
There is one here, from May 19th (go to page 2).
http://www.investimonials.com/websites/reviews-pennystock-chaser.aspx
EDIT: Actually that is just a list of supposed clients. Sorry.
Does anybody have a comprehensive cut and paste of their disclaimer? one that was on their web site?
The complaint listed six examples of their touting, the most profitable example of which was a Toronto company called Atlantic Wind & Solar Inc. The company claims to be making rooftop solar panels. A posting on PennyStockChaser on Oct. 21, 2009, stated: "[Atlantic] is making loads of cash for members who are in the game ... PSC spoke to the company today and they tell us that members should buckle in. Big news is coming at the end of this week." The next day the stock reached a $4.84 high on volume of over one million shares. While posting that message and three others like it, Mr. Ryan and Ms. McKeown sold 360,000 shares, grossing $780,600, the SEC claims.
Another example cited by the SEC was Biocentric Energy Holdings Inc., a Florida company that purported to be developing green energy technology. PennyStockChaser issued four messages touting the stock, including one on July 4, 2009, which stated: "[Biocentric] is the real deal.... This stock already has HUGE VOLUME and it will only get better." The stock, which was trading under a penny, rose to a three-cent high, and its volume had a high of 30 million shares. The SEC said that Mr. Ryan and Ms. McKeown sold 24 million shares around the same time, grossing $569,000.
The other examples listed by the SEC were Avro Energy Inc., Converge Global Inc., Bluewave Group Inc. and MSE Enviro-Tech Corp., which followed similar patterns. The regulator sought disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, appropriate civil penalties and permanent penny stock bans.
maybe the whole thing really was just two people hiding behind a computer, and they did the whole thing totally on their own, had no employees, no consutants, no accounts, no attorneys, nobody, nada.
but i seriously doubt it.
SEC usually gets the weak to sing rather quickly...they'll offer them immunity, same old song and dance...eventually they'll sing, and they will locate Shrek and Fiona ( ogre fiona ) at some point in time
i really wouldn't know.
but so far nobody close to them in any way has come forward at all that i have seen.
that's really unusual.
i did read they had 12 employees, including Ryan and McKeown.
so there are at least 10 involved, unemployed people who will probably have an opinion about the whole thing.
maybe one of them will come forward at some point, preferably in a deposition that will be a matter of public record or something.
maybe Ryan and his heiffer gal pal were involved with a certain crime family...?
No defenders of the PSC team have arrived yet on this message board.
Where are they?
Are they somewhere else on the internet?
I looked around a little today, and I found no evidence, anywhere of anybody standing up for the people involved in the indictment. Nobody is suggesting that anything specific in the indictment is wrong, or even questionable.
All we have seen here is the usual "the SEC is incompetent" and "all they will get is a slap on the wrist" posts here to dismiss the affair. That's not very specific to the indictment or any details of the case.
Mostly what I have read so far is general condemnation of someone screwing the average investor, as well as comments about their personal appearance and that kind of crap.
Not even ONE "I have a friend that worked with them and they tell me..." post has appeared anywhere that I have seen.
So far, anyway.
i'm fairly certain you might find a few posters on ihub on the psc team...jmho
I hope the SEC gets to the people they paid to post about stocks on internet message boards, too. Wouldn't that be awesome?
this blurb is very interesting as the 'disclaimer' seems to be standard practice by all paid touts... i think people were under the impression that they covered their *sses.... guess it didn't
"The SEC said the only warning investors received was woefully inadequate. It came in the form of a disclaimer, which stated that the couple "may be selling shares of the stock at the same time the profile is being disseminated," which investors should view as a "definite conflict of interest."
"
Dan Ryan and Carol McKeown failed to appear at a preliminary injunction hearing held in Florida on Tuesday, July 6, 2010.
http://www.stockwatch.com/newsit/newsit_newsit.aspx?bid=Z-C:*SEC-1738477&symbol=*SEC&news_region=C
people hire lawyers that have been barred from penny stocks. i have seen that just recently.
you left off that everyone has hired an ex sec lawyer as their counsel and they are completely within the structure of their advice...lol
if you look at the response i am posting to he said he believed that psc will be slapped and i responded that i believe that psc will have the book thrown at him and be the lead example for the new task for being set up...
nowhere did i say that psc was an innocent party and to answer another question there is a board that is set up to discuss ....
People get all kinds of legal advice about what kind of disclosure is required. Some heed advice, some ignore advice.
And the truly insane never get advice; they just copy what someone else is doing (or what they are TOLD by another promoter to do) and then ASSume what they are doing must be legal because that's what someone else did. Big mistake.
And then there are those who intentionally lie or omit information they don't want known in disclosures. Many promotoers omit the dates of compensation and use the mysterious unnamed "third party" compensation disclosure, which is not full disclosure, as required under the law. Also, a big mistake.
This is the first case I have seen where the specific number of shares in compensation disclosed by the promoter was part of the indictment, however. But I don't read them all, so I could be mistaken. I actually think that's kind of a minor point.
As for Twister and Factbook, the venue doesn't matter. It's still up to the commercial user to 1. state their commercial status and 2. inform readers that their stock content is compensated. Web sites are not responsible for policing that. It's the author's legal responsibility.
Also, most web sites have special terms for commercial users of their web sites; many people ignore those terms, incuding the site operators, until there is a problem. In fact, some web sites PROHIBIT commercial users and terminate accounts when there is a problem or abuse that leads to discovery of cemmercial abuse of their web site.
Well, now there's a problem. The commercial user problem is the major issue. And I bet that this case doesn't resolve it.
Like I said last week, this case will be entertaining. Mostly to see how Facebook and Twister respond to it. Their web sites were mentioned in the indictment. They can't be happy about that.
i see psc being the example of a new group of sec reps out there to make a name for themselves...
i dont remember ever seeing a case brought by the miami sec dept which tells me there could be a new task force that was started in the miami s.e.c designed for the penny market...
it appears the problem the sec has found is that mr. R has another company name that takes in stock and than pays psc which he also owns less amount so that his disclaimer does not look as big as it really would be..
as for twitter and facebook,i think the miami s.e.c guys have opened a great big door cause i dont see the disclaimers being used there and the promoters think there is a blanket that covers them..
plus my understanding from the s.e.c is if you have 500,ooo shares and on day 2 you have sold 75,000 shares,they want that info in the updated disclaimer he time you send out an email..
subway was doing it that way in the last few years he was around...
HUMMM Slap on wrist - NOT ALWAYS. Loving this one. He who lauigh last..........
SEC's case against Wile, Lines set for Oct. 12
2010-07-07 15:30 AT - Street Wire
Also Street Wire (U-*SEC) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
by Mike Caswell
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's market manipulation case against West Vancouver promoter Anthony Wile, his uncle Wayne Wew and the Lines brothers of Bermuda has been scheduled for trial by jury. The hearing will start on Oct. 12, 2010, at 9:30 a.m. in New York. At trial, SEC lawyers will argue that the men manipulated Vancouver-based Sedona Software Solutions Inc. to $10 with misleading news releases and paid touts, and that the Lines brothers sold $1.5-million worth of stock. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.)
The trial date comes after the judge rejected motions by Mr. Wile and the Lines brothers to have the majority of the SEC's case thrown out. They unsuccessfully argued that there was no evidence that they did anything wrong, and claimed that Sedona's news accurately described a deal to acquire mining properties in South America. They said that that the SEC contributed to that deal's failure by halting the stock. The judge denied their motions in a June 23, 2010, decision, without giving any reasons.
SEC's complaint
The SEC launched the case on Dec. 19, 2007, when it filed a civil complaint in the Southern District of New York. The defendants included Mr. Wile, Mr. Wew, newsletter writer Bob Chapman, and Scott and Brian Lines. Also named was LOM (Holdings) Ltd., a Bermuda brokerage run by the Lines brothers.
According to the complaint, the Sedona manipulation took place in January, 2003, after the Lines brothers secretly acquired 99 per cent of the company's shares through nominees. The SEC said they enlisted friends to act as signature directors for offshore companies that bought the shares. The men then touted the company in news releases as a gold producer with the rights to three mines in South America. The SEC said the news was misleading, because Sedona had not actually closed its deal for the mines, and it still had to raise $6-million to satisfy the terms of the agreement.
The complaint also described how the Lines brothers and Mr. Wew carried out a prearranged trade on Jan. 21, 2003, in which Mr. Wew bought 5,000 shares at $8.25 from accounts the Lines brothers controlled. The stock had last traded at three cents. Over the next week, the Lines brothers sold 159,300 shares at prices between $9 and $10, the SEC said.
Fuelling demand for the stock, according to the SEC, were "independent" research reports that Mr. Wile paid for. The author of one of these reports was Mr. Chapman, who failed to disclose that he had bought 370,000 shares of the company under $1, the SEC said. He then predicted that Sedona would reach $62, touting it as "an incredible opportunity that could be the largest public offering in the United States for a mining company this year."
The promotion ended on Jan. 29, 2003, when the SEC halted the company, citing questions about the accuracy of its agreement to acquire rights to the mines. When it resumed trading two weeks later, Sedona fell under $1.
The SEC sought orders permanently banning all of the defendants from participating in penny stock offerings, as well as appropriate civil penalties and disgorgement of profits.
Motions to dismiss
The Lines brothers denied any wrongdoing, and filed a motion for summary judgment against the SEC on Feb. 1, 2010. In it, they asked the judge to dismiss most of the case on the grounds that the SEC had not provided sufficient evidence to show that the company's news was misleading.
According to the motion, the mines Sedona proposed acquiring were a valuable asset that had once belonged to Greenstone Resources Ltd., a public company that operated them during the 1990s. At one point it had a $1-billion market cap. Greenstone started having problems in 1999 when gold fell to $250 per ounce, and it eventually went bankrupt.
In 2002, Mr. Wile reached a deal to acquire a 90-per-cent interest in the mines through a private company called Renaissance Mining Corp. The terms called for Renaissance to obtain $5.5-million in financing, which it proposed raising by going public. The company would merge with Sedona in a reverse takeover.
Immediately after Sedona announced the agreement, the SEC began investigating. According to the motion, the regulator phoned Mr. Wile and Brian Lines as well as several investors. At least one investor was scared to the point where he immediately sold his shares, the motion stated. Seven days after the company announced the deal, the SEC issued the suspension order. With the stock halted and a major investigation under way, closing the deal became impossible, the Lines brothers said. The mines eventually went to RNC Gold Inc., a Toronto Stock Exchange listing that raised $30-million and was later taken over by Yamana Gold Inc.
Mr. Wile and Mr. Wew filed similar motions on Jan. 25, 2010, also asking the judge to dismiss the majority of the SEC's case.
Settlement talks
There remains the possibility that the men could reach a settlement before the trial. On July 2, 2010, the judge referred all sides to a magistrate judge to facilitate settlement discussions. Should those talks fail, the trial will begin as scheduled.
One of the defendants who will not be participating in the settlement talks or the trial is Mr. Chapman. On June 18, 2010, the SEC won a default judgement against the 72-year-old newsletter writer after he failed to respond to the suit. The judge banned him from penny stocks, and invited the SEC to file an application for appropriate civil penalties.
Shareholders come and go but penny CEO's just keep 'promising'. How many penny CEO's ever fulfill their promise of great wealth?
With nothing more than a web site, message boards and tall lies, any con artist can make a product or service 'appear' real, when it's true 'usefulness' is zip. After the dump, the CEO reverse splits the stock and bagholders lose everything and have no one to sue due to all the carefully couched disclaimers and warnings. They just tuck tail and move on, mumbling something about 'my bad'.
The share price goes to .0001 and the company doesn't even have the trouble or expense of filing BK??
The traders and MB's love the pumps and become 'supporters' of the whole process.
Under Surveillance: AWSL Chairman Has Some Skeletons in His Closet
by Melissa Davis - 12/16/2009 6:49:44 AM
* Click here to start/join a discussion of this article or send tips for future news stories.
Gilles Trahan, the chairman of both Atlantic Wind & Solar (AWSL.PK) and MSE Enviro-Tech (MEVT.PK), better hope that investors don’t start judging him by the company he keeps.
After all, Trahan has ties to Basil Meecham – a past target of securities regulators – that date back at least eight years. The two men remained connected as Facebook friends as recently as last month, although they have since taken steps to block visitor access to their personal information. The Street Sweeper captured evidence of that Facebook friendship weeks ago, however, in anticipation of such changes.
Meanwhile, past ties between Trahan and Meecham remain a matter of public record. The paper trail starts during the early years of this decade, when both men worked for a doomed penny stock company known as Symphony Telecom. The company employed Trahan as its chairman and CEO, public filings show, while it paid Meecham (with 1.5 million shares of its own stock) for providing “consulting services” to the firm.
The same company retained Mario Giangioppo – a disbarred attorney – as its legal advisor, The Globe and Mail revealed, before later changing its name. While running for political office in 2003, the newspaper noted, Giongioppo wound up dropping out of the race when his past came back to haunt him...
http://www.thestreetsweeper.org/undersurveillance.html?i=65
PennyStockChaser Fails to Outrun the SEC
by Melissa Davis - 6/30/2010 8:21:40 AM
PennyStockChaser, a promotional website that caught the attention of TheStreetSweeper seven months ago with its breathless recommendations of dubious microcap companies, cannot run away from government authorities any more.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission cracked down on PennyStockChaser this week, filing charges against the website, its two owners – Carol McKeown and Dan Ryan – and two investment firms under their control. In its formal complaint, the SEC accused the defendants of “clandestinely selling millions of shares” in the same stocks that it was urging investors to buy. All told, the SEC estimates, the defendants pocketed at least $2.4 million from their so-called stock-scalping scheme.
“McKeown and Ryan used all the modern methods to communicate with investors, including the PennyStockChaser website, email, text messages, Facebook and Twitter,” Eric Bustillo, director of the SEC’s office in Miami, stated when announcing the charges on Tuesday. “Yet (they) failed to adequately communicate that their rosy predictions for touted stocks were accompanied by their sales of those very same stocks.”
According to the SEC, PennyStockChaser promoted more than 65 different penny stocks during 2009 alone. When TheStreetSweeper originally examined PennyStockChaser back in November, it calculated that the website had already received almost 200 million free trading shares – after just seven months of operation – in the companies it was paid to tout.
As it turns out, however, PennyStockChaser apparently received even more stock than the website actually disclosed. The SEC now claims that PennyStockChaser collected far more shares of Atlantic Wind & Solar (OTC: AWSL.PK) and MSE Enviro-Tech (OTC: MEVT.PK) – the very companies scrutinized in TheStreetSweeper’s past coverage of the website – than it reported to the public. Of the $2.4 million realized by PennyStockChaser through its scalping scheme, SEC figures indicate, roughly $1 million came from sales of AWSL and MEVT alone.
Fueled by PennyStockChaser’s paid touts, the SEC says, AWSL soared from 70 cents a share last July to $4.84 a share just three months down the road. AWSL had fallen to $3 when TheStreetSweeper published its story in November, less than a month after the stock peak, and has plummeted to just $2 a share since that time.
MEVT fared even worse. That stock, which jumped from 35 cents to $1.30 after PennyStockChaser touted the company, now fetches a mere 10 cents a share.
AWSL and MEVT feature other common traits as well. They share the same chairman – examined in detail by TheStreetSweeper in a previous story – and the same investor relations firm to boot.
Even PennyStockChaser lumped the two companies together when bullishly touting their shares.
“The same guys who brought us AWSL have brought us MEVT,” PennyStockChaser cheered during the height of the big company promotions last fall. “AWSL has made members a fortune, and we are sure MEVT will do the same … The stock could see a move to the $5 (range) and make members big money – if they move fast.”
Apparently, PennyStockChaser had already begun to make its own move by then. Through related entities, the SEC claims, the website’s owners sold 360,000 shares of AWSL for $780,600 in proceeds. They also sold 533,334 shares of MEVT, the SEC says, for another $240,000 in gains.
The SEC has now frozen the defendants’ assets, however, and is seeking full disgorgement of any ill-gotten returns. It hopes to secure penny-stock bars against PennyStockChaser – which liked to promote itself as the most popular website for “hot penny stock tips” – and its two owners as well.
To contact Melissa Davis, the author of this story, please send an email to editor@thestreetsweeper.org.
http://thestreetsweeper.org/article.html?c=3&i=879
Removing ones ability to make a living is hardly a slap on the wrist. All Dan Ryan knows is how to exploit penny stocks.
He will have to figure out a way to scam others outside of his comfort zone. In a new area where he is uncomfortabale and unskilled.
Heck, his so called "skills" in the penny market have pretty much been shown to be horrible by the SEC as he couldn't even run a promotion company within the rules and regulations.
But if you really want to defend such action by saying it's no big deal and promotion companies sell stock all the time then I guess it shows exactly who you align yourself with. Deception and fraud are bad BRIG. In case you didn't know.
Don't let your dislike of certain posters force you to back the crooks when they get caught. It only makes you look like a crook too.
Oh ok....no big deal then
That's exactly how it will play out. And I think everybody knows that. PSC was as crooked as promoters come from top to bottom. The "boiler plate" SEC litigation release contains facts that are gathered through subpoenas to brokers not a "guessing game".
Their investigations are lengthy and when they drop the hammer their ducks are all in a row.
I highly doubt they will even want to go to court with this. Instead they will settle this out of court as quickly as possible. Those clowns do not want to see the inside of a court room on this one. If they even try to argue this the result is maximum penalty. If they settle out of court they get a little bit of a break and they don't have to admit guilt.
So, they will settle or they are truly stupid.
in this case, the indictment specifically mentions that the "IR company" lied about the number of shares they received, even though they disclosed their compensation in some places on the internet.
So, even disclosing compensation isn't good enough. Accuracy is required. As it should be.
This will be a really good Twitter and Facebook test case.
Followers
|
17
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
292
|
Created
|
07/01/10
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderator Buckey | |||
Assistants laurap scion janice shell |
PSC, PennyStockChaser, was a penny stock promotion company touting their picks for about a year.
The SEC has shut them down.
“As alleged in our complaint, McKeown and Ryan used all the modern methods to communicate with investors
including the PennyStockChaser website, e-mail, text messages, Facebook, and Twitter
yet failed to adequately communicate that their rosy predictions for touted stocks were
accompanied by their sales of those very same stocks.”
said Eric I. Bustillo, Director of the SEC’s Miami Regional Office.
"The agency charged a Canadian couple, Carol McKeown and Daniel F. Ryan,with four counts of fraud for using their Penny Stock Chaser Web site and Facebook and Twitter feedsto promote a half-dozen companies’ stocks.What the two did not disclose to their followers, according to the complaint, filed in federal court in southern Florida,is that they were regularly selling shares in the companies they were hawking, a practice known as “scalping.”" | "According to the S.E.C.’s complaint, Ms. McKeown and Mr. Ryan began Penny Stock Chaser in the spring of 2009, promoting themselves as a husband-and-wife team that led a group of skilled stock pickers. Over the past year, their firm touted the stocks of at least 65 American companies. (The S.E.C. is pursuing the case in Florida because many of the couple’s trades were made in Boca Raton, although they were based in Montreal.)" |
the new york times piece quoted above. |
"The agency contends that the duo received "millions of shares" of the touted companies through their two corporations, Downshire Capital Inc. and Meadow Vista Financial Corp., as compensation for touting stocks, then sold the stocks while the website simultaneously predicted massive price increases. The SEC says the couple and their companies have likely realized at least $2.4 million in sales proceeds from the scheme." from the wall street journal write up. | "The government is seeking injunctions against the two, along with the disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, plus interest and a fine as well as penny-stock bars against them and repatriation of assets to the government. " |
sec complaint | montreal gazette |
sec press release | timothy sykes |
Litigation Release No. 21580 | the street |
Posts Today
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
292
|
Posters
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Assistants
|
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |