Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Stalinistkidd, now, you're denying the law
of thermodynamics? LOL. Have you started shaking your shoebox? A creator is one who is responsible for order, and this creator is in control of nature, and can override it. "Peace, be still" Did your computer come from someone who created order? Or did evolve from chaos?
thermodynamics, another tool the nutjobs have jumped on to deny thier origin. And coming from a group who believe the sky is going to split open, a bugle will be a trumpeting and jesus will appear a savin...
BTW, don't go around accusing others of name calling anymore. You have called be several different names in your recent posts to me
"And then there's the fact that those sour-faced, unhappy-sounding critics Bush was mocking have, time and again, been proved right
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/linkset/2005/04/11/LI2005041100879.html
Stalinistkidd, actually
with all the prophecy for 4000 years BC, and the fulfillment of such in Christ, my faith is in Christ, not seeing some creature come from sludge. I doubt I'll ever see that.
Also, the LAWS of thermodynamics dispute your THEORY of evolution. The firecracker god does not exist. Why don't you break a lightbulb, put it in a shoebox and shake it for a billion years? After all of that time, do you think you will get a perfect lightbulb that lights or just have dust?
daytraderkidd.rotflmao!!!!!
Hey FruitLoops, a lot more proof that the big bang is real than jesus coming back to save you.
When you consider that you believe that the sky will split open, you will hear a bugle and jesus will appear before your eyes to save you, I can't see anything about the big bang theory that would seem out of reach..
Your problem is that you have been dummed down since birth with religion and more than likely watching to many cartoons
Hey Firecracker kid,
Alot more proof that Jesus walked the Earth than the Big Bang firecracker that defies the 2nd and 3rd laws of thermodynamics.
You're such an intolerant Stalinist.
Jesus never did anything to me. And he has never done anything for you. When you think you are building your personal relationship with jesus christ, you are really talking to air.
I think that makes you an Air Head
Stalinistkidd liberal propagandist
desperately heads for his anti-Jesus one-liners while he worships the firecracker god. What did Jesus do to you?
Just another example of the intolerant and morally bankrupt. I must worship the great firecracker to be approved by a sludge human?
You libs are supposed to be tolerant, peace-loving, free-spirited. Remember, whatever goes! That's stuff the sheeple believe.
Hey FruitLoops, liberals don't rewrite history. Infact, the Jesus Camp graduates like yourself rewrote the first 4.5 billion years off history off into oblivion
I'll prove this liberal propaganda is a farce.
BUSH and RUMMY linked Al Qaeda and Iraq?
Maybe, but they weren't the first, and the idea that they manipulated intelligence is a total farce. Read Clinton's words in 1998.
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040624-112921-3401r.htm
>>>>>
Clinton first linked al Qaeda to Saddam
The 1998 indictment said: "Al Qaeda also forged alliances with the National Islamic Front in the Sudan and with the government of Iran and its associated terrorist group Hezbollah for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies in the West, particularly the United States. In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the government of Iraq."
>>>>>>
But, liberals like yourself are very determined to rewrite history through pathetic excuses and propaganda. "I said it but I didn't mean it...I never did believe it..." as I paraphrase Madeline Halfbright in her opportunistic book of propaganda. If it's not a book of propaganda, is she admitting that the Clinton administration blatantly lied to the American public?
Read these quotes from Madeline Halfbright and other democrats:
http://www.husseinandterror.com/
More information on the same subject matter:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=5951&R=C6811940A
It's all about opportunism from the democrats.
NOW, QUIT SPAMMING THIS BOARD. YOU SEE HOW MY POST HAS SUBSTANCE? MIRROR IT WITH THOUGHT AND FACT INSTEAD OF A PROPAGANDA VIDEO LINK TO A DIM BULB ON GOOGLE THAT'S PASSING OUT TAINTED KOOL-AID.
Pentagon office produced 'alternative' intelligence on Iraq http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/16656258.htm
Rodriguez was the last survivor pulled from the rubble of the north tower of the WTC, and was responsible for all stairwells within the tower. Rodriguez represented family members of 9/11 victims and testified to the 9/11 Commission that bombs were in the north tower but his statements were completely omitted from the official record.
Venezuelan Government To Launch International 9/11 Investigation
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/310306launchinvestigation.htm
"We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," ... "It was just so far from the truth. . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."
Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor and co-chair of the 9/11 Commission.
http://vt911.org/
Scientists clash over 9/11 collapses- http://911science.blogspot.com/
That is enough facts for today. blessings folks, the truth is out there. We must first open our hearts to the facts, but some people can remain the way they want, and that will be without scientific facts and documented facts and proof.....
take care my brothers and sisters......
Hawking warns: We must recognise the catastrophic dangers of climate change http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2162862.ece
CNN INTERVIEWS CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN, 9/11 RESEARCHER- http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?noframes;read=98482
Recent polls suggest more than a third of Americans believe that either the official version of events never happened, or that US officials knew the attacks were imminent, but did nothing to stop them.
That's an impressive statistic in itself. Now look at the success Loose Change has had. Google Video acts as a portal for the movie, where you can also see the running tally of the number of times it has been viewed since last August. As I write, it stands at 4,048,990. By the time you read this, it will have risen considerably higher. On top of that, the movie was shown on television to up to 50 million people in 12 countries on September 11 last year; 100,000 DVDs have been sold and 50,000 more given away free. Then there are many more who have watched the film but are never counted, as a result of the active encouragement the film-makers give their supporters to burn the movie and distribute it to their friends. Avery says 100 million people - "easy" - have seen it. That may be an exaggeration, but it's fair to say that something extraordinary is going on.
The Loose Change story begins in May 2002 on the opening night of a Mediterranean restaurant in Oneonta where Avery, then aged 19, is working as a dishwasher. A friend of the owner, James Gandolfini (aka Tony Soprano), is a guest at the party and Avery gets chatting with him. "We started talking about movies and shit," Avery recalls. "Gandolfini told me, if you want to do something that matters, you have to talk to the entire world. You have to have something to say."
http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,1998430,00.html
Bush administration accused of doctoring scientists' reports on climate change- http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2002484,00.html
Rumsfeld, DOD officials attend meeting on erasing North American borders- http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/01/rumsfeld_dod_officials_attend_.php
US Army sued for spying on blogs- http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=8305
GOP Views Clinton As Virtually Unbeatable http://rawstory.com/showarticle.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2Fstories%2F0207%2F2654...
Liberal hypocrisy on Mark Foley
Mark Foley belongs in jail, but why did Gerry Studds get reelected after he had gay sex with a page? How many times did democrats reelect him after he was censured? 6+ times.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerry_Studds
It's only wrong if you're not a liberal. The epitome of hypocrisy. Now, libs want to investigate members of congress for inappropriate emails while their history shows that they will gladly reelect a sexual predator if you have a (D) by the name.
PATHETIC!
The question has been asked, and you refused.
http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=16660968
Why did you continuously refuse to answer
any questions on this board? You'd continuously post conspiracy theories to disrupt. Logical people want answers, not myths.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=8192
Mystery and facts aren't synonomous, nutty!
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=2
And, myths aren't facts. Multiple myths and claims have been debunked, and it seems like someone is still drinking the nut kool-aid.
MIT Engineer Breaks Down WTC Controlled Demolition http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1822764959599063248
More Facts-Mystery C-130 over Pentagon at time of Attack
http://911exposed.org/C130.htm
Kelly Knowles, who lives in an apartment a few miles from the Pentagon in Fairfax County, says she saw a second plane in the air over the Pentagon, she said some sort of plane followed the first jet toward the Pentagon, “… when a low-flying, high-speed plane buzzed the high-rise, she jumped up, ran to the windows and saw the rear of a jet heading toward Washington, D.C. A few seconds later, a second plane that seemed to be chasing the first passed over at a slightly different angle.”[ii] This also coincided with what Keith Wheelhouse, her brother and who was ex-Army, saw: “The second plane looked similar to a C-130 transport plane… He believes it flew directly above the American Airlines jet, as if to prevent two planes from appearing on radar while at the same time guiding the jet toward the Pentagon.” Then, “… the second plane banked off to the west.” His sister, Pam Young, and at least one other person, collaborated the story but weren’t sure what type of aircraft it was.199
FBI agents interviewed both Knowles and Keith Wheelhouse. A Pentagon official denied that another plane was flying with the jetliner, but admitted “it was possible a military plane was in the area at the time of the attack.”199
In an almost identical account, Allen Cleveland stated, “My brother-in-law also witnessed the same plane following the jet while he was on the HOV lanes in Springfield. He said that he saw a jetliner flying low over the treetops near Seminary RD in Springfield, VA. And soon afterwards a military plane was seen flying right behind it.” [iii]
Eyewitnesses saw the C-130 veer off from the “jet” then circle above the Pentagon when it was attacked.
The C-130 not only guided the “jet” to the Pentagon, but made a full circle above it, then made a course due west. Kelly Knowles noted that as the first plane “descends toward the Pentagon, the second plane veers off west.”199 An Arlington National Cemetery worker claimed, “ that a mysterious second plane was circling the area when the first one attacked the Pentagon.” [iv] And Scott P. Cook “ ...As we watched the black plume gather strength, less than a minute after the explosion … Directly in back of the plume, which would place it almost due west from our office, a four-engine propeller plane, which Ray later said resembled a C-130, started a steep decent towards the Pentagon.”[v] And, Joel Sucherman noticed that, “Off to the west…[he] saw another plane climb steeply and make a sharp turn.”[vi] And another witnesses, Allen Cleveland, identified the plane as a C-130, “Soon after the crash (Within 30 seconds of the crash) I witnessed a military cargo plane (Possibly a C-130) fly over the crash site and circle the mushroom cloud.”[vii] Ex-marine Phillip Thompson, stated, “…Then a gray C-130 flew overhead, setting off a new round of panic…”[viii]
The media failed to report or follow-up on the C-130 sightings. Allen Cleveland stressed, “…I was interviewed at Washingtonpost.com and gave them my full story, but they did not print it as I have told you …I’m not saying that the government new exactly what was about to happen, but I do believe that they are definitely hiding something here…”[ix] His remarks indicate that he believes there is some time of cover-up going on and possibly the media — complacently involved.
An Air Force man, Albert Hemphill, specifically identified the aircraft as an electronic warfare aircraft (EC-130), he noted, “The only large fixed wing aircraft to appear was a gray C-130, which appeared to be a Navy electronic warfare aircraft, he seemed to survey the area and depart in on a westerly heading.”[x]
After initially denying witness reports, the government reverses its position…
Official Confirms a C-130 crew did see the Pentagon strike.
Witnesses to the Pentagon attack were troubled that Pentagon had denied the presence of the C-130. However, almost a month and a half later, the Daily Press reported on the (dubbed) October 17th Surprise:
A C-130 cargo plane had departed Andrews Air Force Base en route to Minnesota that morning… said Lt. Col. Kenneth McClellan, a Pentagon spokesman. In the days immediately following the Sept. 11 hijackings, the Pentagon claimed it had no knowledge of the C-130’s encounter, because all reports were classified by the Air National Guard…[!][xi]
So their excuse for deceiving us was “We didn’t know because — it was classified!” 208 It’s a bad lie because NORAD and NMCC obviously would have been tracking the C-130, unless it has some type of top-secret Klingon “cloaking technology”.
Despite numerous terrorist attacks and a FAA grounding Andrews AFB launches a routine C-130 across the nation!
Was it a routine flight? The C-130 (call sign: Golfer 06) was at both the Pentagon and Shanksville at the time of each attack. It was highly classified. (Since when is a routine ANG flight so classified that nobody at the Pentagon or NORAD knows!) And most importantly, we know that the government tried to cover it up for as long as they could, 36 days. Was it an EC-130 (electronic warfare version of C-130) on a sinister highly classified mission? How was this C-130 able to take off from Andrews AFB when the FAA issued a ground stop for all planes, including military, five minutes before?
At 9:25, The FAA in collaboration from the White House, initiated a national ground stop, which forbids takeoffs and requires planes in the air to get down as soon as reasonable. The order...applied to virtually every single kind of machine that can takeoff — civilian, military, [and] law enforcement.178
And so the fable began:
About 9:30 a.m., O’Brien throttled the lumbering plane down a runway at Andrews Air Force Base, just southeast of the District of Columbia …[xii]
Even though his account is rather immature and laced with inconsistencies, it was a clever ploy to turn an embarrassing and incriminating incident into something rather contrary. Since the government seemed to be coming up short of good evidence in substantiating it’s story, it appears that they elected to craft this “I saw the plane” tale. The tale would, like others before him (Donald “Tim” Timmerman — who fell on his face on CNN), attempt to unequivocally state that it was an American Airlines 757 — Flight 77. More on Steve O’Brien and the C-130 in the “Witnesses” chapter.
This of course was just spin, while the real questions were being circumvented. For one, why was the C-130 following and guiding a jet toward the Pentagon? Why was it circling above the Pentagon just prior to the attack? And why was this exact plane spotted, and even confirmed by the military, over Shanksville during Flight 93’s crash? And most importantly, how was the government promptly able to launch a transport plane, but unable to launch any high-speed fighters?
The flight path of the C-130.
We can reconstruct the flight paths of the jet and the C-130, which followed it by a few seconds. Witnesses claimed it was flying “on top of and behind” of a jet “and guiding it toward the Pentagon” as “to prevent two planes from appearing on radar”. At the time of the attack it was seen diving down and then circling the Pentagon. Later, it was seen heading in a westerly direction.
Mark Foley & Other GOP Sexual Predators
Wayne Madsen Report | October 9, 2006
On October 2, WMR was the first media outlet to report on the involvement of Arizona Republican Rep. Jim Kolbe, the only openly gay GOP congressmen, in the Pagegate matter. We reported that Kolbe was a member and chairman of the House Page Board at the time reports of ex-Florida GOP Rep. Mark Foley's inappropriate sexual conduct with underage male pages was known to the Republican House leadership. WMR reported:
"From 2000 to 2001, the Page Board Chair was Rep. Sue Kelly (R-NY) and members included Rep. Jim Kolbe (R-AZ) ( inexplicably replaced as chairman by Kelly) , Kildee, Trandahl, and Livingood. Crews was the program coordinator. From 1999 to 2000, the Chairman was Kolbe and members included Rep. Jo Ann Emerson (R-MO), Kildee, Transdahl, and Livingood. The coordinator was Crews. From 1998 (when the allegations first reportedly surfaced about Foley), the Chair was Tillie Fowler (R-FL) and members were Kildee, Kolbe, House Clerk Robin Carle, and Livingood. The page coordinator was Hugh Addington. Foley became a congressman in 1995."
The Washington Post is reporting today, rather belatedly, that Kolbe was aware of Foley's salacious e-mails with an underage page in 2000. One of Foley's Instant Messages sent in January 2002 to a page stated that Kolbe once invited four pages to use his Washington home while Kolbe was in Arizona.
There is also much focus on the relationship between House Speaker Dennis Hastert and his chief of staff, 56-year old Scott Palmer. Hastert and Palmer, Hastert's longtime unmarried adviser, live together in a DC townhouse along with Hastert's Deputy Chief of Staff, Mike Stokke, while Hastert's wife Jean lives in Yorkville, Illinois and stays at a hotel when she visits Washington.
WMR has also learned of additional Senate links to the Pagegate scandal. There is much focus on GOP Sen. George Allen's predominantly white male staff. There is also interest in the activities of a senior GOP Senator from a Rocky Mountain state.
WMR's State Department sources have also reported that the visits of Hastert and other congressional leaders and staff members to certain Southeast Asian nations and the Northern Marianas should come under the scrutiny of the House Ethics Committee, now officially investigating "Pagegate." The Northern Marianas became infamous in the scandals involving Tom DeLay and Jack Abramoff because of the presence in the US slave labor territory of Asian children being used as prostitutes. Conveniently, Foley co-chaired the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children, which would have had authority to investigate charges of child prostitution in the Northern Marianas.
Our State Department sources report that it is no secret that a number of U.S. Foreign Service officers working out of the U.S. embassies in Bangkok, Phnom Penh, Hanoi, and Manila have been involved with underage nationals of the host countries where they are assigned. In fact, many have rotated their assignments between countries that look sideways at child prostitution and sex between adults and minors. In fact, John Mark Karr, as previously reported by WMR, was quickly whisked out of Bangkok after his arrest on pedophilia charges. The U.S. Embassy in Bangkok, working with the CIA and Department of Homeland Security, arranged for Karr's quick departure from Bangkok on a business class flight to the United States, where all charges, including those stemming from Karr's "admission" that he killed JonBenet Ramsey and child porn charges, were later dropped. WMR has learned that Karr may have been aware of the identities of top U.S. officials in the child sex trade in Thailand and that he was sprung from Thai authorities to prevent him from testifying in a Thai courtroom.
Hastert visited Vietnam, along with Palmer, in April of this year and spent three days in the country. Hastert, along with Illinois GOP Rep. Ray LaHood, canceled a visit to Thailand and Vietnam in January 2006. Hastert was also in Thailand in January 2002
Still haven't figured out the Big Bang "THEORY" is a theory?
I would ask you to quit spamming this board with your nonsense. If you can't understand that theory is hypothesis and not factual evidence, but supposition, then you just don't get it. The theory may have a basis, or a loose relationship to fact, but theories themselves are mere speculation. Theories are not considered facts and 'law'.
Scientific theory and scientific law are two different things, of which, you evidently are confusing the two. The second and third laws of thermodynamics dispute the Big Bang theory, as science states that order goes to chaos, not the opposite.
Sexpresso?!?
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2237661.ece
How low can some people go to attract business?
You mean, more "theory".
You confuse theory, opinion, and fact.
Please seek help, and quit spamming this board. There is nothing scientific about that story.
Please do some research on http://www.dictionary.com to help you on words you don't understand.
more Scientific facts and statements - http://www.thestreet.com/funds/fundmorning/10336832.html
Pitting a dictionary against "scientific fact"
LMAO. You're getting more and more delusional.
As I have pointed out time and time again to you, the majority of the science community condemn your absurd theories, and that is what they are, theories.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories
"The mainstream scientific community does not support the controlled demolition hypothesis and U.S. officials, mainstream journalists, and mainstream researchers have concluded that responsibility for the attacks rests solely with Al Qaeda."
Your fundamentals are off, and since you're off on the fundamentals (even definitions), you'd definitely be off on reality and truth. If your arguments had credence, they'd be widely known. Watergate wasn't a theory; neither was the Lewinsky scandal. Conspiracy theories are theories, regardless of how much you want to rewrite the dictionary. They are called THEORIES for a reason. You'd lap up anything if it was something you'd want to hear followed by the word, "FACT!".
Theories?? There is evidential facts in "theories" and is founded on that. SOME folks keep turning to a dictionary versus science facts and history....and is very easy and silly to see the disinformation, at least from a logical perspective.
everything we know and use is created from science and we have a need to learn more ....... its easy to laugh at non founded unscientific opinions when science created the computer they type on(.. once a theory also), the car they drive(was once a theory also), the airplanes they ride on, the phones they talk on , the list goes on and on, but these are all exaplmes of what was once a theory. Reality is, at some point these theories are applied with science and documented facts to bring them into a reality. So the whole" its just a thoery or just a conspiracy", is very laughable from a logical perspective seeing the ignorance and we must have a vast knowledge to learn more and more. Or else we would still be in the dark ages.........
What don't you understand about "theories"
Maybe you should do some research on http://www.dictionary.com/
Rabid conspiracy theorists do not live in reality, and if you dislike reality, truth means nothing.
some folks can't handle the truth...... denial is the true state of mind for some. The facts are out there my sisters and brothers. some choose to censor or completely ignore the facts. paints a picture on where their state of mind lays....within their fear!!
blessings...... for the truth............
Dems: http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
Democrat quotes...Check this website for many of the reasons from democrats from pre 1998-2003 on how Iraq threatened the USA. Did Bush manipulate the intelligence back in 98? LOL.
Only nuts dismiss history.
Do you know what a theory is? It is not a proven fact and is not based on factual, real evidence. It is supposition.
More statistical facts- http://www.cedarcomm.com/~stevelm1/usdebt.htm
21 proven and documented reasons why this administration went to war
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=2679
Posted by: barryinla
In reply to: Razorbucks who wrote msg# 235 Date:2/4/2007 3:57:04 AM
Post #of 257
please provide links to back up your claims or please post JMHO after your opinion you just posted. And it is an opinon only! Thanks razor and follow the rules my brother and the truth will be revealed through education.Other wise do some DD before you rebuttle. Most of what you have said so far is easily turned around with a few urls and solid information within science and documented facts proving these points of interest that some choose to ignore with ignorance of misinformation and lack of information as falshoods.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/earth_age_030606.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/space/origins/building/index.shtml
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/teachers/programs/3111_origins.html
**********IN RESPONSE TO*************
Posted by: Razorbucks
In reply to: daytraderkidd who wrote msg# 234 Date:2/2/2007 12:45:13 PM
Post #of 257
He believes in the firecracker god!
You're just religious and didn't know it. Did your computer appear from an explosion? Since when in life have you ever seen an explosion create something fascinating instead of destroy? Please do tell.. Just one example..
You want distinguished professors?
Sure, most all mainstream professors/scientists agree that Al-Queda was the cause of 9/11. I doubt it would convince you if I named 90% of the science community. It's only the extremist nuts that propogate chicken little theories, and then alter the theory once they are exposed as an asinine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories
"The mainstream scientific community does not support the controlled demolition hypothesis and U.S. officials, mainstream journalists, and mainstream researchers have concluded that responsibility for the attacks rests solely with Al Qaeda."
That's right. Those conspiracy theories
are proof of nuttiness! Thanks!
An alien invasion is impending, and there is no such thing as terrorism. Nuttiness indeed!
so Razor if you are so sure then please provide the links with distinguished professors scientists and insiders backing up your opinion
Just wondering what your credentials are in comparrison to these very educated a reputable americans defeying the governmants lame story with science
re"http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html
then you have ex- Bush supporters, millitary and other very distinguished insiders serving our country dearly..
http://patriotsquestion911.com/
what list do you have to compare to these people that you so judge and say this about RE' They are generated by extremists, and they change like the wind if they are debunked. A semi-intelligent person can grasp this fact (Read the ibox); however, there are many sheople out there that would believe anything that was spoonfed to them that would blame Bush for anything, even hurricanes.
-----------------------------
DEFINITION-
ex·trem·ist (k-strmst)
n.
One who advocates or resorts to measures beyond the norm, especially in politics.
so razor- logic and evidence seems the norm is on my side my brother and the norm won back the house and the senate also because of the right wing Bush lies and the proof is that the neo-con republicans lost ............This again is another fact you overlook .
you are a minority in your opinon these days because America is learning the truth....your censorship is a minority, your opinion is a minority and is blown away with science and facts. Heck popular mechanics can't even debate their own proof!!
http://www.teamliberty.net/id292.html
your posts contain only a few(same links over and over) or no links what so ever to back up your claims.....
This is the truth my brother and the truth is logically disseminated.
- food for the masses-
blessings......
views: 1,691,125 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003
see inside
here are a few.......and many many more giving you solid scientific evidence......
http://www.st911.org/
http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/9_11_facts.html
http://www.physics911.net/
http://www.physics911.ca/Main_Page
http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/
http://911proof.com/7.html
http://www.hereinreality.com/insidertrading.html
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/eye.html
http://911studies.com/911photostudies1.htm
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/Building7Collapse.shtml
http://www.tvnewslies.org/news/#911
LOLROTF.. No words necessary for this one.
Introducing the man that ran Air America into the ground and now wants to senator in Minnesota. Will they elect him?
Followers
|
0
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
141
|
Created
|
01/25/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |