Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Don't spit into the wind.
robcobb
2m
$NLST Just to let everyone know I called the courthouse and talked to one of the secretaries and she said the jury selection was taking place this morning ,so I will be in Marshall sometime around noon central time ,and we will see what happens soon!
by the looks of level 2. seems the market makers are swaping spit between each other.
one million cash traded in 22 minutes and the day and week are very young !!!
lol !!! whatta ya want ? we're nlst shareholders conditioned for demise with a conscious euphoric mind set for success. we'll get there !!!!
Volume is key as well as price. To turn the 10 day average volume within six minutes of the opening bell is very encouraging .
I am excited at 2
But to get super excited
NLST has condition me not to.
As I see the pps begin to stall & fall
However, it is still early in the day.
We need to fill that gap at 2.99! LFG. Settle Micron!
whats the over and under on how long it takes the gap cryers to start pointing it out lol !!!!
robcobb
6:16 AM
$NLST My plans for the day.At 8:00 central time I will call the court secretary and make sure of the jury selection time and that everything is as it should be.If so,I plan on arriving in Marshall Tx. while the newly picked jury is out for lunch break 12:00to 1:00 central .Opening statements should start near 1:00 central if the jury is picked before lunch.Opening statements should commence at that time.We should get one break before the end of the session.If anything is news worthy before break I will leave the courthouse and call Bolliver with that news and he will report.If nothing newsworthy it will probably be after I get something to eat and get back to my room and go over my notes before I report anything!Hopefully I will get to hear Dr.Kennedy testify today,that would be newsworthy! Hopefully justice for Nlst this week!GL Longs
Netlist, Inc. v. MICRON TECHNOLOGY TEXAS, LLC (2:22-cv-00294)
District Court, E.D. Texas https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc/?order_by=desc
I thinking that start happening now
time for strap to set rates for past and present !
BEAUTIFUL !!!
key sentence.. According to foreign media and industry on the 3rd......... they have no clue ptab is meaningless in a federal court.
Well, the fact is:
First, Samsung has been found in breach of the JDLA with Netlist for the SECOND time, by jury verdict. Can this second BOC verdict be appealed? It can be, but I doubt the appeals court would hear the case a second time. Let’s wait and see.
Second, the 912 (claim 16) patent has been found patentable TWICE by the PTAB and once by the CAFC In the Google case. This means that coupled with the affirmed BOC by Samsung, any chip with the 912 Patent inside sold to and put into Google servers are infringed. There’s millions of them and Google will have to pay Netlist a royalty for those chips.
Third, in the #0463 case with Samsung? Now that the BOC case has been decided, Gilstrap will finalize the bench trial verdict and set royalty rates for the infringed patents. Once he does that? 30 days later, Samsung will appeal. I think that appeal will be heard and it will add 12 -18 months to the outcome. Unfortunately.
Fourth, the upcoming Micron case has that 912 patent in it. It was recently declared not patentable by the PTAB. There little doubt in my mind that the CAFC will overturn the PTAB on this decision, in light of the way it was already affirmed in Google case. I’ll bet that Gilstrap believes this also. He will ignore the PTAB ruling and proceed with the Micron trial today. I believe Micron will be destroyed in this trial. There’s not much doubt that Micron will appeal the decision. We’ll have to wait to see if the appellate court will hear the case. If it does? Yes. All this will add time - unfortunately.
But what else is new? This has been a long battle and it will continue to stretch out for some time.
I believe the CAFC will overturn the 912 PTAB decision, and there’s a good chance they will also overturn the 060 and 160 decisions.
hey buddy i can assure you ScamScum is not laughing about this: Samsung Materially Breached Agreement and No Longer Has Patent License esp when we knock their heads off at the CAFC. LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
yea its looking good. finally the ascent to the top should start. I'm waiting for shorty to cover his position
Samsung Materially Breached Agreement and No Longer Has Patent License
https://www.accesswire.com/865311/netlist-prevails-in-federal-court-against-samsung#:~:text=Has%20Patent%20License-,Netlist%2C%20Inc.,the%20parties%20in%20November%202015.
I'm liking the bid ask this a. m. 1.87x1.95
$NLST somebody get this guy some toilet paper. the very very cheap kind please
That is awesome
Jimmy, here's a link to "PTAB Board Decisions":
https://developer.uspto.gov/ptab-web/#/search/decisions
In the main search column (top middle) type Netlist.
To the left under Identifiers - choose Patent #
In the next section, use the last 3 digits of the Patent Numbers listed here:
Patent 8,787,060
Patent 9,318,160
Patent 11,016,918
Patent 11,232,054
Patent 10,860,506
Patent 10,949,339
Read - Decision - Final Written Decision for each patent,...you should then be able to determine who's living in a fantasy.
FANTASY-MASTER, suddenly posting in a MB when never seen here before.~?
Sounds like you are either a Samsung shill, OR a short trying scare NetList shareholders.
Didn't even read your post because the thing I like most about the 3 Amigos (Scamscum, Micrumb and Googoo)
is that what applies to one company applies to all of them. They are all abusing and using the same basic patents among one another (Scamscum make Levino laptops and tablets as well as Googoo phones). Micrumb is in collusion with Scamscum and Googoo. Already known for years now.
The price action has you a little concerned~? Why, if all you say is true~?
PTAB is an absolute joke-fest. USPO currently being sued~? Say it ain't so. Even they seem to be on the take.
Dude, crawl back under your rock and come out when the smoke clears. We'll see how it goes then~!
Oh, one other thing....... the Judges aren't buying any of the crap you posted. Scamscum already on the hook for $360 million is it~? That doesn't even include damages. How much do you think licensing will render~?
These three ass-🤡 Companies have used another's technological patented IP for YEARS/working on decades and they still
fight and moan about payment to another~?
This has been a long long fight (too long), but it will eventually have its ending. Meanwhile, my guess is that SK will further enhance its relationship with NetList while Scamscum gets left to rot. Either pay or we do not play with you if I were Chuck Hong.
All execs all 3 companies should be locked in a 5x7 cell. Criminals all.
$Netlist baby~!
Sounds like you might work for Samsung and pls tell us what makes you a master? Or maybe just another clown. LOL
Do you work for Samsung?
Samsung, imo, have been laughing until it hurts since last December: (Micron too)
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/samsung-knocks-out-another-netlist-patent-tied-to-303m-award
https://www.law360.com/articles/1820234/samsung-micron-notch-ptab-wins-on-netlist-patents
$NLST Thank you for the LAUGH. LMAO
NLST Shareholder fantasy/wishful thinking, imo.
Are we forgetting that none of the trial patents currently have any validity.
https://www.mk.co.kr/en/business/10981422
The U.S. Patent Tribunal ruled five patents invalid. The 400 billion won reparations are gone.
Samsung Electronics won a patent invalidation lawsuit with US semiconductor company Netlist.
According to foreign media and industry on the 3rd, the U.S. Patent Tribunal (PTAB) ruled in favor of Samsung Electronics on the 2nd (local time) in two patent invalidation lawsuits filed by Samsung Electronics.
All five patents that Netlist filed for patent infringement, including three that had already been judged invalid, were ruled invalid, and all grounds for the payment of the lawsuit in the Eastern District Court of Texas in April last year disappeared.
The lawsuit between Samsung Electronics and Netlist began in 2021 when Netlist filed a lawsuit claiming that memory technology used in Samsung's cloud computing servers violated its patents.
Netlist claimed that its technology improves the efficiency of memory modules, allowing them to derive useful information from large amounts of data in a short period of time, and that Samsung Electronics took the patented technology after collaborating on the project, while Samsung Electronics has countered that Netlist's patents are invalid and that its technology works differently from Netlist's.
In April last year, a U.S. jury found that Samsung Electronics violated five patents on Netlist, and in August of the same year, the court accepted the jury's verdict and ruled that Samsung Electronics should pay $303 million in compensation to Netlist.
Samsung Electronics filed a patent invalidation trial with the U.S. Patent Tribunal for five patents alleged to be infringed, and all five cases related to patent litigation, including the two cases, were declared invalid.
Prediction:
Samsung Case re: Dec 20/21 - stayed until completion of Patent IPR's/CAFC Appeals. (assuming Netlist is appealing patent invalidation to the CAFC)
Micron Case re: June 10/22 - ditto
(Somewhat confusing is that it says 506 & 339 dropped from the case, but then in the list of patents it brands them as "appealed")
They all need to be appealed to the CAFC.
As usual, chaos rules.
ok i found this........says eye is spot on...... https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573510036.png
I have no idea if its true I was just saying if true, I read eyeownu's message that he copied from stock twitts
i like the sound of it but i dont remember reading anything stating it. if you or any one else can enlighten me where i can read that it would be deeply appreciated. now i gotta go read our boc docs again !!!
I would think that would mean alot to NLST and maybe a settlement from Micron. My thinking if Micron can get Samsung info thats huge. mho
was just reading that and wondering how that works ?
$NLST Very important to note from the BOC termination on a material breach. $NLST now has a perpetual license for Samsung's memory products. This might not mean much for NLST, but SK Hynix or Micron could do a JV with NLST and produce products using Samsung's IP.
https://stocktwits.com/DoubleUProfits/message/573508203
the 912 has been tried off the top of my head at least 4 times. ptab has approved it and denied, cafc overturned ptab and now ptab wants another go at it because the mighty big tec says so. not to be pushy but only because you actually need to read that document. it is written by...
https://www.irell.com/professionals-philip-warrick
he has the back ground to know what ptab has to do, can do, and cant do, or get away with.
That's where this would go if the Director sides with the Board - correct? yes
Is this the current state of the 912? yes thats why you need to read warwick, vidal will get this stuck up her.......
oh i get the picture, the artists, the canvas and all the ravenous colors !!!!!!!!!!
Ouch, that's torment bro!
( i guess since i'm a shareholder now, so i'm shar'ing in the paain)
o.k., well i didn't read it all , but Netlist wants to talk to people who know the rules ( Director) vs those that can be influenced ( string yanked Board). , of course this is prior to having to go the CAFC. That's where this would go if the Director sides with the Board - correct?
Is this the current state of the 912?
regarding your side note - i'm there, SK Hynix case did it for me.
When you think about it like this - Does SV want to control and dominate? - yes they do, imo
What does control and dominate have in common with? - i think you get the picture.
Thanks bro, you enjoy the rest of the weekend too.
c'mon man dive in read it ! vidal either over rules her board of bs artists or cafc hands her her head on a platter. cafc will use whats in that document against her. ptab is nothing more than a thorn in everyone's side and has no authority in a federal court room. only draw back is its very time consuming.
ok cool......now that your up to speed with the rest of us on what we're up against. factor in the amount of time we the shareholders have been tormented with illegal infringement as a profitable multi billion dollar business at our expense. then your on our level, but that part is an option for you to decide.
for us its either you believe in a positive outcome or you dont.........
as for your question........ Does Gilstrap have to wait for the CAFC decision on the PTAB invalidated patents befor ruling on this case?
no, cafc will either validate or invalidate his decision if and when appealed. they have the final say.
on a side note.........i will never enter into another litigation play due to the corruption your up against that involves a legal system that gives the defendant the opportunity to procrastinate into the next century !!!! and i cut that very short, but any way, you got the gist of whats going on here.
enjoy your weekend, peace...........
Without punishing me to read all that, is the 912, including claim 16 - valid ?
If so, the 912 case with Micron and Google should be moving expeditiously along - yes?
Appreciate all the info on this board.
yeah, (sigh) boils down to what the definition of "is" is.
I really got tired of this with the SK Hynix ITC case.
You guys are doing a great job here following the "Netlist Legacy of Court Battles"
Be my guest - write a book with the above title.
RIDICULOUS
Credit to Hong, all around for battling on.
Sadly, demonstrates the complete lack of Rule / Law / Boundaries / Reasonableness /
really - it's child's play
imo, the modus operandus of the current legal system, is that the judges do not want to be the ones to make decisions. - just my opinion.
So what is their role then?
Yes, to facilitate the trials, more importantly to facilitate settlement.
The problem in this instance, imo, is that the industry top dogs do not want to set a legal precedent of settlement, and i can see their point ( too many patent infringement cases). Therefore delay, while not victory,.. is a perpetual convenience.
With the current Netlist/Samsung BOC case, unanomious jury decision,, any appeal by Samsung should be shut down immediately by the FC judge. That would be an utter waste of court resources and would do what the court system is suppose to do - move the case along/settlement.
The other problem here with this case appears to be the invalidation of subject patents, ( while winning in court, said patents are conveniently being invalidated at the PTAB)
SSUURRE... all 5 patents are conveniently "obvious" - looks like bs, imo - see below link.
https://www.mk.co.kr/en/business/10981422
Although this case is different then the SK Hynix ITC case, there are eerily similar strings being yanked to the detriment of Netlist, imo.
Does Gilstrap have to wait for the CAFC decision on the PTAB invalidated patents befor ruling on this case? (seems to me like he will)
still will if i see that pps on monday !! lol !!! for real.......
hey jet if ya wanna swap out charts this one is updated 5-19-24
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174448834
Stokd $NLST *Netlist Litigation Chart*
To note:
—Netlist won BOC trial Friday / Samsung is unlicensed.
—Micron patent infringement trial starts Monday.
—Gilstrap can now rule on Samsung463 post trial motions & Netlist ongoing royalty.
—Some patents in 463 case already under CAFC appeal / others pending Director Review requests.
—DE Samsung/Google case can resume given BOC win, stay not predicated on CAFC appeal of validated 523 ptnt.
—With BOC win, Gilstrap can schedule Samsung293 trial involving same patents as Micron294 trial Monday.
—Micron203 case is stayed but ready for trial and awaiting direction/guidance from Gilstrap.
—Micron136 WD Texas case involving 3 PTAB validated patents is awaiting a ruling on Netlist’s motion to transfer to ED Texas/Gilstrap.
—Netlist filed a Director Review request of PTAB decision invalidating claim16 of 912 ptnt, which starts the process of reversal either by USPTO Director or CAFC next, after which and if reversed/validated, Google CA 14yr case can finally resume.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573500409.png
Followers
|
304
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
11
|
Posts (Total)
|
25100
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators gdog 100lbStriper Daylas Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs |
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote:
https://netlist.com/
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |