NetList Inc (NLST)

[1984ISHERE]

Looking forward to this

[100lbStriper]

TOMKiLA
55m

$NLST “the ‘912 p. Played a large part in Google’s dominance in search. “

Ready for the trails, ready to see huge amount of cash 💰

Against Samsung and micron

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570485592.png

[100lbStriper]

6 more days till the fun starts !!!

[100lbStriper]

gilstrap will do the same thing to micrap as he did scamsung. he will tell them your ptab bs is meaningless in my court room.

[Jetmek_03052]

Case 2:22-cv-00294-JRG Document 106 Filed 04/22/24

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.106.0.pdf

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF FINAL ELECTION OF INVALIDITY THEORIES, PRIOR
ART REFERENCES/COMBINATIONS, AND EQUITABLE DEFENSES

Defendants Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., and Micron
Technology Texas LLC (collectively, “Micron” or “Defendants”) hereby provide the following list
of invalidity theories, prior art references and combinations, and equitable defenses that they
continue to assert against Netlist, Inc. (“Plaintiff”).

[100lbStriper]

PTAB Institutes IPR Despite Delayed Sotera Stipulation
February 16, 2024
https://www.akingump.com/en/insights/blogs/ip-newsflash/ptab-institutes-ipr-despite-delayed-sotera-stipulation

[100lbStriper]

Stokd $NLST The new notice in the Micron 294 case is just their Sotera stipulation… it’s standard and something Samsung filed in all their cases—not sure what took Micron so long, expected much sooner.
“Micron will no longer pursue invalidity defenses in this action (C.A. No. 2:22-CV-00294-JRG) that the patent claims subject to the instituted IPRs are invalid based on grounds that were raised or reasonably could have been raised in the IPRs.”

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570478074.jpeg

[100lbStriper]

more stuff!!! https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc/?order_by=desc

[100lbStriper]

it would be nice for sk to drop our ticker symbol in a pr once in awhile, or do you think because we're in litigation and on the otc there instructed not to????????? who cares....soon enough........

https://www.thelec.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=4808

[gdog]

To those that observe...Happy Passover...

[100lbStriper]

Stokd $NLST Netlist just responded to both Micron motions in the 294 case regarding Apr 29 trial—day early on the Continuance—so we should hear from Gilstrap anytime.
Both motions and responses are sealed.

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570442254.png

[100lbStriper]

no offense taken, i'm fully aware of where that verbiage originates. but believe me you the context in which i'm currently using it, is whats going to happen lol !!! yeah i've been shot at, i earned my degree,we'll leave it at that lol !!! my go to's keep me from letting it overwhelm me !!! it aint all wine, woman and song out there in the world...........

peace my brother...........

6bux or better by the end of june is my call !!! if not, yeah i know how to wait!!!

[gooferball]

Respectfully, as a Vietnam Vet I just wonder if you realize what you're exhorting us to do when you shout out, as it were, that we "Get some!!". Admittedly, my momentary flashes of PTSD-type sweats are minor these sixty years later, but simply wanted to mention it in case you're not aware. I would never ask anyone to not speak their mind, and I can handle reading it occasionally; perhaps you also are a Viet Vet, if so, forgive my big mouth. Appreciate all you do otherwise [smile], and please keep up the good work!! Cheers

[gdog]

as did you just alittle bt luckier

[100lbStriper]

we won the 29th trial. lets wait and see how we did it. be hard pressed for a start to beat that, other than them forfeiting before hand...........

[100lbStriper]

i thought it would go higher the last time it hit 6. did buy my share of 102-120's though. those i want 6 or more for and actually thought i 'd have it by now. thats why i'm sayin if those 3 things happen by the end of june and they dont let this run it will look horribly criminal.........

[Jetmek_03052]

As usual, I will try to err on the side of caution. I know that people say the PTAB rulings have no weight inside a federal court, while they are still able to be appealed. We still must await the appeal to the CAFC, and their rulings on these PTAB verdicts.

Still, I believe there are cases in work in which the PTAB rulings were in favor of Netlist patents! These should be easy courtroom wins.

There's light at the end of the tunnel.

[eyeownu]

my friend says you got a good deal

[gdog]

sure seems like this should already be higher one of these days this will run like a scalded dog..

[100lbStriper]

ummmmmmm........ that dog better be ready for a run to 6 and higher and i'll make sure he gets a good home !!! i'm excited for the next 3 outcomes, 29 trial, boc verdict, strap slappin on the going rate. if that can happen in a month we should run.... no delays no delays no delays........... is june a possibility ? lol !!!

[100lbStriper]

you know there getting hammered just because they never had a license. how much is up to a jury, and when is as good as guess as anyone else's, sound about right to you ? i feel 10x more confident on winning this than the prior, and we won the priore unanimously, willful infringement, who knows how much, could be less but we are winning this..........

NLST BABY !!!
GET SOME !!!

[gdog]

price is reflecting the shorts nervousness

[Jetmek_03052]

Case 2:22-cv-00294-JRG Document 102 Filed 04/22/24
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.102.0.pdf

ORDER
The Court issues this Order sua sponte. Before the Court is Micron’s Opposed Motion for
Continuance (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 101.) The response to this Motion is currently due after
jury selection in this case.

The Court finds that expedited briefing is warranted.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS sua sponte that Netlist’s response to the Motion, if any,
must be filed no later than 5:00 p.m. CST on Tuesday, April 23, 2024.
.
____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 22nd day of April, 2024

Anyone want to guess at what Netlist's motion will be??

DENY!

[Jetmek_03052]

One week until Jury Selection and Trial Day 1 against Micron - Case #0294!

[gdog]

my 1.02's are looking alittle better that your 1.07's lol

[eyeownu]

$NLST freed up another 2500 should I wait for the dip or buy before the RIP. that 1500@1.07 is looking guuuud

[Jetmek_03052]

New litigation chart (04/21) courtesy of Stokd

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
53m

$NLST ***Netlist current litigation status***
Posted 3 days ago, but wanted to reflect Netlist's new motion to lift WD-TX 136 case stay and transfer to ED-TX/Gilstrap, as well as highlight very recent developments—something I failed to do on last version—which I think helps with following things.

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570335833.png

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
50m

$NLST “PTAB Invalidation of Patents Following Jury Verdict of Infringement Does Not Necessarily Impact Willfulness Finding”

“Apple asserted that its belief was based on interim rejections"

“argued that the reasonableness of this belief was confirmed by final written decisions from theUSPTO finding the asserted patents invalid. Accordingly, Apple argued that it could not be found to have willfully infringed during the period after the2012 verdict”

“JudgeSchroeder disagreed,finding that Apple’s continued sales following the2012 verdict were “unreasonably risky.”JudgeSchroeder’s decision specifically found unpersuasive Apple’s argument that,because the subsequent decisions found the asserted patents invalid,it could not be held liable for willful infringement”

"blind reliance on the fact that theUSPTOhas issued decisions finding asserted claims invalid subsequent to a jury verdict of infringement as meaning one could not have willfully infringed may be a risky position"
https://www.akingump.com/en/insights/blogs/ip-newsflash/ptab-invalidation-of-patents-following-jury-verdict-of

[100lbStriper]

robcobb
8:02 AM

$NLST Nlst has lots of near term important dates coming up.April 23/ scheduling conference for the 628 case,April 25 /Nlst ER,April 29 /Micron trial,May 6 /pre-trial for the BOC trial,May 14 /BOC trial,which as important as the Micron trial is , the BOC trial may be more important since Judge Gilstrap is waiting on that verdict to rule on JMOL and new trial motions, then set royalty rates for the Samsung 463 case that is a year old now! Samsung has accrued a year in interest and royalties after Judge Gilstrap sets that rate.Will Samsung appeal and take a chance on accruing another year’s interest and royalties waiting on the appeal decision? Only time will tell what that amount will be ,but I think it has to be big ! Also we could find out soon if the west Texas case will be transferred to Judge Gilstrap!I think longs have a lot to look forward to near term now! The next few days are going to be exciting ,hopefully getting justice for Nlst and its investors!

[Jetmek_03052]

Maybe! We'll see.

The Short Interest report comes out on the 24th, but it won't show the short interest for this current period. Next report (May 9th) will show that.

[gdog]

I haddn't noticed the close untill right now, $1.40 maybe a little short covering started.

[Jetmek_03052]

Case 1:22-cv-00136-DII Document 92 Filed 04/19/24

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1162388/gov.uscourts.txwd.1162388.92.0.pdf

I. INTRODUCTION
The Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (“Eastern District” or “EDTX”) is the
center of gravity for the various patent disputes between the Netlist, Inc. (“Netlist”) and Micron. Netlist thus respectfully requests that the Court lift the stay and transfer this case to the Eastern District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to enable a speedy resolution of the parties’ disputes. Netlist is asserting the following patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 9,824,035 (the ’035 patent), 10,268,608 (the ’608 patent), and 10,489,314 (the ’314 patent).

[100lbStriper]

TOMKiLA
46m

$NLST Kennedy damages discussion for micron “potential 70$ per unit” but with more than 30$ per unit we will enjoy a lot

https://www.reddit.com/r/Netlist_/comments/1b8f8wj/wow_this_is_really_interesting/?share_id=O2mlbfugIAgjC3d7uz8bh&utm_content=2&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_source=share&utm_term=1

[100lbStriper]

TOMKiLA
50m

$NLST netlist is ready to get 7/8 years of micron damages and hopefully even more time and hundreds of millions of dollars in damages.
Each server uses 912 technology, micron is responsible for at least 2 million servers with lrdimm or rdimm every year!
At least 5/10 million dimms sold by micron with NLST technology.

The big question will be, how much will netlist get for each product with 912 technology? History is written here friends!

[100lbStriper]

Durango24k
1:55 AM

$NLST Per @stokd request. Pg 1 of the Intro for Netlist' Opposed Motion to Lift Stay and Transfer Venue from WD to ED of Texas
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570278075.jpg

$NLST Per @stokd request. Pg 2 of the Intro for Netlist' Opposed Motion to Lift Stay and Transfer Venue from WD to ED of Texas
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570278073.jpg

[100lbStriper]

Stokd $NLST Just filed in Micron 294 case... some prep for trial.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570270646.png

[100lbStriper]

lets get it started, some of the claims are ptab approved lol !!!

[100lbStriper]

CASE 136....... 92

Apr 19, 2024

Opposed MOTION to Lift Stay and, Opposed MOTION to Transfer Case by Netlist, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Michael Harbour in Support of Netlist, Inc.'s Opposed Motion to Lift Stay and Transfer Venue, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Proposed Order)(Ransom, Kelly) (Entered: 04/19/2024)

Main Doc­ument

Lift Stay AND Transfer Case

Attach­ment 1

Affidavit Declaration of Michael Harbour in Support of Netlist, Inc.'s Oppo

Attach­ment 2

Exhibit 1

Attach­ment 3

Exhibit 2

Attach­ment 4

Proposed Order

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63002940/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-inc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

[100lbStriper]

Stokd $NLST 🔥Just filed in the WD-TX case—PLAINTIFF NETLIST, INC.’S OPPOSED MOTION TO LIFT STAY AND TRANSFER VENUE—"The Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (“Eastern District” or “EDTX”) is the center of gravity for the various patent disputes between the Netlist, Inc. (“Netlist”) and Micron.1 Netlist thus respectfully requests that the Court lift the stay and transfer this case to the Eastern District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to enable a speedy resolution of the parties’ disputes. Netlist is asserting the following patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 9,824,035 (the ’035 patent), 10,268,608 (the ’608 patent), and 10,489,314 (the ’314 patent)."
I can't seem to make the full doc publicly accessible so I can link it, not working for some reason, if anyone else can try.

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570265267.png

[Jetmek_03052]

Document drop about a case stay being lifted and transferred from the West Texas District court?

[100lbStriper]

Stokd $NLST Another entry into the "PTAB got it wrong" series published today — "In a precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit reversed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) decision in holding that certain claims of the Virtek patent (U.S. Patent No. 10,052,734) were unpatentable as obvious."

"The court concluded that the “case involves nothing other than an assertion that because [claim elements] were disclosed in the prior art and therefore ‘known,’ that satisfies the motivation to combine analysis. That is an error as a matter of law. It does not suffice to simply be known. A reason for combining must exist."

"Align Vision contended that a person of ordinary skill in the art (POSA) would have been motivated to combine the references as a matter of “common sense.” However, the Federal Circuit rejected this argument and noted, as in the primary appeal, that Align Vision never presented any evidence or arguments before the Board regarding common sense."

https://www.ptablitigationblog.com/known-claim-elements-alone-insufficient-for-motivation-to-combine/

[100lbStriper]

time for a summer bbq!!!!

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
7m

$NLST When investors are educated, follow developments closely, and can understand/digest their meaning and implications... it renders FUD & PTAB irrelevant—as is the case with this board and current situation.

All of which helps strengthen confidence and conviction, especially towards seeing this through to conclusion.

This week—with its developments and price action—has been a psychological victory, which otherwise can be perceived on the surface as something else. Hence, we know to let things play out—as Sonny used to say.

How all aspects in Netlist's litigation unfold remains to be seen, making it impossible to determine at this point what will or will not ultimately go in Netlist's favor, to what extent, and how price action will respond. As well as any possible licensing deals, settlements, or partnerships that can be worked out along the way, even while appeals are active/pending.

There's a lot of litigation to come... we know where our focus should be—Dist Crt/Gilstrap/CAFC.

[greese57]

NLST:)$$$ one of these days Alice bang zoom!!!!

[100lbStriper]

''one of these days'' is coming soon!!!!

[eyeownu]

$NLST This stock is so undervalued its ridiculous. anyone need a kidney ? i know someone willing to part with theirs for 150k

[100lbStriper]

BolliverShagnasty
3m

$NLST if you have not read this yet you need to read it. @microby is telling you where the value is. These patents are already validated. @robcobb @stokd check this out!!!
https://stocktwits.com/BolliverShagnasty/message/570239898

[100lbStriper]

YOWZA!!!! NLST BABY !!! GET SOME !!!

[gdog]

the dog is ready, have a great wkend My friend.