Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Stokd
53m
$NLST ***Netlist current litigation status***
Posted 3 days ago, but wanted to reflect Netlist's new motion to lift WD-TX 136 case stay and transfer to ED-TX/Gilstrap, as well as highlight very recent developments—something I failed to do on last version—which I think helps with following things.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570335833.png
Stokd
50m
$NLST “PTAB Invalidation of Patents Following Jury Verdict of Infringement Does Not Necessarily Impact Willfulness Finding”
“Apple asserted that its belief was based on interim rejections"
“argued that the reasonableness of this belief was confirmed by final written decisions from theUSPTO finding the asserted patents invalid. Accordingly, Apple argued that it could not be found to have willfully infringed during the period after the2012 verdict”
“JudgeSchroeder disagreed,finding that Apple’s continued sales following the2012 verdict were “unreasonably risky.”JudgeSchroeder’s decision specifically found unpersuasive Apple’s argument that,because the subsequent decisions found the asserted patents invalid,it could not be held liable for willful infringement”
"blind reliance on the fact that theUSPTOhas issued decisions finding asserted claims invalid subsequent to a jury verdict of infringement as meaning one could not have willfully infringed may be a risky position"
https://www.akingump.com/en/insights/blogs/ip-newsflash/ptab-invalidation-of-patents-following-jury-verdict-of
robcobb
8:02 AM
$NLST Nlst has lots of near term important dates coming up.April 23/ scheduling conference for the 628 case,April 25 /Nlst ER,April 29 /Micron trial,May 6 /pre-trial for the BOC trial,May 14 /BOC trial,which as important as the Micron trial is , the BOC trial may be more important since Judge Gilstrap is waiting on that verdict to rule on JMOL and new trial motions, then set royalty rates for the Samsung 463 case that is a year old now! Samsung has accrued a year in interest and royalties after Judge Gilstrap sets that rate.Will Samsung appeal and take a chance on accruing another year’s interest and royalties waiting on the appeal decision? Only time will tell what that amount will be ,but I think it has to be big ! Also we could find out soon if the west Texas case will be transferred to Judge Gilstrap!I think longs have a lot to look forward to near term now! The next few days are going to be exciting ,hopefully getting justice for Nlst and its investors!
Maybe! We'll see.
The Short Interest report comes out on the 24th, but it won't show the short interest for this current period. Next report (May 9th) will show that.
I haddn't noticed the close untill right now, $1.40 maybe a little short covering started.
Case 1:22-cv-00136-DII Document 92 Filed 04/19/24
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1162388/gov.uscourts.txwd.1162388.92.0.pdf
I. INTRODUCTION
The Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (“Eastern District” or “EDTX”) is the
center of gravity for the various patent disputes between the Netlist, Inc. (“Netlist”) and Micron. Netlist thus respectfully requests that the Court lift the stay and transfer this case to the Eastern District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to enable a speedy resolution of the parties’ disputes. Netlist is asserting the following patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 9,824,035 (the ’035 patent), 10,268,608 (the ’608 patent), and 10,489,314 (the ’314 patent).
TOMKiLA
46m
$NLST Kennedy damages discussion for micron “potential 70$ per unit” but with more than 30$ per unit we will enjoy a lot
https://www.reddit.com/r/Netlist_/comments/1b8f8wj/wow_this_is_really_interesting/?share_id=O2mlbfugIAgjC3d7uz8bh&utm_content=2&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_source=share&utm_term=1
TOMKiLA
50m
$NLST netlist is ready to get 7/8 years of micron damages and hopefully even more time and hundreds of millions of dollars in damages.
Each server uses 912 technology, micron is responsible for at least 2 million servers with lrdimm or rdimm every year!
At least 5/10 million dimms sold by micron with NLST technology.
The big question will be, how much will netlist get for each product with 912 technology? History is written here friends!
Durango24k
1:55 AM
$NLST Per @stokd request. Pg 1 of the Intro for Netlist' Opposed Motion to Lift Stay and Transfer Venue from WD to ED of Texas
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570278075.jpg
$NLST Per @stokd request. Pg 2 of the Intro for Netlist' Opposed Motion to Lift Stay and Transfer Venue from WD to ED of Texas
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570278073.jpg
Stokd $NLST Just filed in Micron 294 case... some prep for trial.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570270646.png
lets get it started, some of the claims are ptab approved lol !!!
CASE 136....... 92
Apr 19, 2024
Opposed MOTION to Lift Stay and, Opposed MOTION to Transfer Case by Netlist, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Michael Harbour in Support of Netlist, Inc.'s Opposed Motion to Lift Stay and Transfer Venue, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Proposed Order)(Ransom, Kelly) (Entered: 04/19/2024)
Main Document
Lift Stay AND Transfer Case
Attachment 1
Affidavit Declaration of Michael Harbour in Support of Netlist, Inc.'s Oppo
Attachment 2
Exhibit 1
Attachment 3
Exhibit 2
Attachment 4
Proposed Order
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63002940/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-inc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
Stokd $NLST 🔥Just filed in the WD-TX case—PLAINTIFF NETLIST, INC.’S OPPOSED MOTION TO LIFT STAY AND TRANSFER VENUE—"The Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (“Eastern District” or “EDTX”) is the center of gravity for the various patent disputes between the Netlist, Inc. (“Netlist”) and Micron.1 Netlist thus respectfully requests that the Court lift the stay and transfer this case to the Eastern District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to enable a speedy resolution of the parties’ disputes. Netlist is asserting the following patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 9,824,035 (the ’035 patent), 10,268,608 (the ’608 patent), and 10,489,314 (the ’314 patent)."
I can't seem to make the full doc publicly accessible so I can link it, not working for some reason, if anyone else can try.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570265267.png
Document drop about a case stay being lifted and transferred from the West Texas District court?
Stokd $NLST Another entry into the "PTAB got it wrong" series published today — "In a precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit reversed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) decision in holding that certain claims of the Virtek patent (U.S. Patent No. 10,052,734) were unpatentable as obvious."
"The court concluded that the “case involves nothing other than an assertion that because [claim elements] were disclosed in the prior art and therefore ‘known,’ that satisfies the motivation to combine analysis. That is an error as a matter of law. It does not suffice to simply be known. A reason for combining must exist."
"Align Vision contended that a person of ordinary skill in the art (POSA) would have been motivated to combine the references as a matter of “common sense.” However, the Federal Circuit rejected this argument and noted, as in the primary appeal, that Align Vision never presented any evidence or arguments before the Board regarding common sense."
https://www.ptablitigationblog.com/known-claim-elements-alone-insufficient-for-motivation-to-combine/
time for a summer bbq!!!!
Stokd
7m
$NLST When investors are educated, follow developments closely, and can understand/digest their meaning and implications... it renders FUD & PTAB irrelevant—as is the case with this board and current situation.
All of which helps strengthen confidence and conviction, especially towards seeing this through to conclusion.
This week—with its developments and price action—has been a psychological victory, which otherwise can be perceived on the surface as something else. Hence, we know to let things play out—as Sonny used to say.
How all aspects in Netlist's litigation unfold remains to be seen, making it impossible to determine at this point what will or will not ultimately go in Netlist's favor, to what extent, and how price action will respond. As well as any possible licensing deals, settlements, or partnerships that can be worked out along the way, even while appeals are active/pending.
There's a lot of litigation to come... we know where our focus should be—Dist Crt/Gilstrap/CAFC.
NLST:)$$$ one of these days Alice bang zoom!!!!
''one of these days'' is coming soon!!!!
$NLST This stock is so undervalued its ridiculous. anyone need a kidney ? i know someone willing to part with theirs for 150k
BolliverShagnasty
3m
$NLST if you have not read this yet you need to read it. @microby is telling you where the value is. These patents are already validated. @robcobb @stokd check this out!!!
https://stocktwits.com/BolliverShagnasty/message/570239898
YOWZA!!!! NLST BABY !!! GET SOME !!!
the dog is ready, have a great wkend My friend.
i understand but too many buyers were in the way. i bet the pink clown even loaded up yesterday lol !!! that is if it even knows how to trade !!!
microby
49m
a look into weekend befor DDR4 damages trial
i have the impression that patent '912 is seen as "the holy cow", mhhh. well, of course 912 describes the way to increase capacity and efficiency, several modules together. '912 describes how the memory controller has to work to run these multi module configurations used in HPC systems. with claim construction order focuses on a single, stand-alone module. Right? Yes, '912 describes much more.
But is that a problem? No!
The single stand-alone module must have the properties to be able to work according to the N- logic. That is the reason why it is not a problem how the claim constructions were ruled around the topic "rank"
'417 is with its predecessors ('215, '314 and older) a little bit older than '912 and was released in August 2021. a really big one! look in doc228,
it continues from doc228
"...’417 Patent add sections on “Load Isolation,” “Back-to-Back Adjacent Read Commands,” “Serial-Presence Detect Device,” “Tied Data Strobe Signal Pins,” and “Memory Density Multiplication,” in addition to the ’912 Patent’s subject matter on “Command Signal Translation......”
and that's why I think the '417 is very significant in recovering the lost profits through damages with microns's LRDIMM.
in the end '417 has run through the following ipr's, all predecessor papers, but look with your own eyes into the '417
several ipr to the '907, several ipr to the '150, several ipr to the '185, to the '536 and '364
well known for more than 10 years!!!
and the last ipr of the predecessor '314 IPR2022-00744/745 with fwd - all challanged claims patentable - aha.
No wonder Micron already submitted the FWD to the cafc as an appeal in December 2023
I think the mole in the courtroom will be able to report something pleasant, I salute YOU
go to the last page and read the language of the '912 in the claims!!!
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/f7/17/a9/dd8dddd73e2d17/US11093417.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570224372.png
99 Apr 19, 2024 Main Document Redacted Document
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc-pursuant-to-court-order/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
hey i nailed the bottom just want cash incase lol
you read too many msg boards !!! even the pink clown could of told you 50 cents would never happen. get the dog ready to run. i smell one of these days coming into the spring/summer !!!!
yes but the talk about going to .50 scared me
now now, you had your chance!!! lol !!!
$1.36x1.37 now of course I wished i would have bought the 5000 shares instead of 2000 lol
robcobb
7:04 AM
$NLST Almost all of the IPRs against Nlst patents are almost completed now except for a couple I can think of.We now know how we stand with the ptab on the patents winning some and losing more.(That scenario and negativity is almost behind us).It is now Judge Gilstraps turn at getting to the bottom of the validity of the remaining patents although claim constructions and trial against Samsung by Judge Gilstrap would lead us to believe most of the patents are valid!Now April 29 is big in that we know after yesterday’s filing with Judge Gilstrap doing some house cleaning with Dr,Lyndes testimony that he is full speed ahead on the upcoming trial even after the ptab ruling on claim 16! I am not a suit person,but I am going to enjoy wearing a suit in ten days from now and reporting what happens against Micron.Micron has drug their feet all the way to this trial,I am anxious to see what Micron does now since they can no longer stall! I am pretty sure Prime Larry will be there with me again!
4 new docket entries in the Micron 294 case dropped late.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
NLST Case 0294 Netlist v, Micron.
The Honorable Judge R. Gilstrap preparing to preside over the patent infringement jury trial set to begin April 29, for the unlicensed use of several Netlist patents.
Apr 18, 2024 Main Document Order on Sealed Motion
96 - Apr 18, 2024 Main Document Order on Sealed Motion
97 - Apr 18, 2024 Main Document Memorandum & Opinion AND ~Util - Terminate Motions
98 - Apr 18, 2024 Main Document Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.97.0.pdf
NLST they didn't discover anything, it's obvious... right Kathy?
https://www.techradar.com/pro/scientists-inch-closer-to-holy-grail-of-memory-breakthrough-producing-tech-that-combines-nand-and-ram-features-could-be-much-cheaper-to-produce-and-consume-far-less-power
SilviaJ Apr 16, 2024 2:26 AM https://stocktwits.com/SilviaJ/message/569690757
scheduling conference 2 days before our 4-25-24 cc pertaining to the 628 case with patentable claims !!!! according to chart !!!
TY for putting that up that quick!!!
NLST to Vidal, Jurgovan, Galligan, and the rest of the corrupt scum from PTAB - a big F You... just remember, karma is a bitch and that goes for Google, Scamscum, and Micrime... your day will come... NLSTLONG&STRONGER! and our sunscreen painted clown with the kim jong hair doo !!!
https://media0.giphy.com/media/P5OPJ9u1xTZegDEVz6/giphy.gif?cid=9191ed4cizysoltot5ogbfxbwj7bb3tijsfxppmm73wpl35g&ep=v1_gifs_gifId&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g
BolliverShagnasty
1:35 PM
$NLST IMO everyone should shift focus to the 314, 608, and 523 patents which are alrteady validated and the 6 patent case (423) in Texas with the Jury award of 300 million. The validated patents ensnare Google, Samsung, and Micron and the 6 patent case was decided by a district court and Jury. Judge Gilstrap can disregard the PTAB. Anyone ever think Jason might be playing rope a dope with the older patents? He always has a strategy.
NLST take a look at the PTAB conclusion phrasing vs the Claim Construction from Gilstrap on the definition of rank and its meaning pertaining to the actual patents in question as they are intended to be used specifically.
PTAB says “a rank may include only one memory device” which in their mind makes the claim 16 of 912 invalid because although claim 16 refers to multiple devices working together controlled by a common subsystem, the semantic ordinary meaning of the word rank could also refer to only one chip (out of context and standing alone).
It’s like how the word “moose” is the same singular and plural. Netlists patents refer to the plurality for the specific patents to work as intended, but yes the most common iteration of the word out of context could mean singular.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570026104.png
thread..... https://stocktwits.com/mrbiggumsworth/message/570026104
4-18-24 litigation chart if you feel like replacing the stickied one........... Stokd
12:19 PM
$NLST Looking ahead to the future!!!
***Current litigation status***
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570039439.png
ok i'm back and had dinner, held up real well considering what the 3 stooges had to say under vidals direction. they should bury her under samscums ice skating rink........
got filled at 1.07 earlier and its not looking to shabby!
my opinion on todays action so far and then i'm taking a nap.... ironically and about time it shows what the market actually thinks about ptab lol........if they held any real clout this would of opened under a buck and still been there now. in 11 days we get back to what we consider normal around here !!!
Followers
|
305
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
8
|
Posts (Total)
|
25056
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators gdog 100lbStriper Daylas Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs |
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote:
https://netlist.com/
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |