NetList Inc (NLST)

[100lbStriper]

i hope so !!! because then i'm giving my moderators spot to you. i'll never bet the farm again i promise lol !!!!

[gdog]

lol but by the end of 2024 you'll be cash flush weeeeeeeee

[100lbStriper]

microby
4:34 PM

ahh, understand, thx 🙏
a first and a second set of DATA,

so written in Lee‘s ‘160, and not that shitty hot potato drop sceme from Keith Brent‘s HMC, cube thing 😉

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_566811797.png

[100lbStriper]

i did !!! and i have been checking on you. but you forgot the part about me telling you i dont have any more money!!!

[gdog]

Larry I use charts on different time frames and different scans
I have about at 98% win ratio I have been prefecting it for 10 yrs lol
so I won't give away any scerets.
I don't chat there just post my entires and exits your very welcome to follow and buy sell when you want gl

[Lvogel]

I just saw your trades and I was wondering how you go about selecting what stocks to enter for a potential bounce. Thanks
Larry

[Redoocs]

Nasdaq baby. That's where we will be seen. Chucky should have put us there after the SKH deal.

[gdog]

should have followed me here https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bottom-swing-plays-29717 I make money everyday and buy more NLST with the proceeds...

rotflol

[100lbStriper]

shorts, algo's and the otc make our stock look like crap, and on top of that the underlying story is rellatively unknown. nothing happens till we get the attention of big money. imo...... and dont forget the clown lol !!!!!

[100lbStriper]

all 4!!! with a duel hemi over drive, there toast!

[manfromjax]

I just wish they would be selling at a much higher price, like in the 6's, then we would all be in the green and could consider selling some for a CAPITAL GAIN! Just go look at META. Zuckerburg is selling every day!$$$ Just sad to see every other chipmaker going up and NLST sits in limbo land.

[NewbieDoobyDoo]

Four Wheel Drive?

"... FWDs of unpatentability...."

Front Wheel Drive?

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
9m

$NLST And another entry in the "PTAB got it wrong" series—examples of the CAFC (Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit) reversing/vacating PTAB decisions.
"On appeal, the Federal Circuit vacated the PTAB’s decision, concluding that the facts more closely aligned with decisions finding written description support for a claim range."
https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/federal-circuit-finds-written-4466143/

[100lbStriper]

like i said, i'd be doing the samething.

[100lbStriper]

i hear ya loud and clear.....

[Jetmek_03052]

I feel much the same. Look at the number of shares Hong sells as compared to the amount of shares he still owns. What....maybe 1% or less? BFD

He gets gifted those shares as compensation. He's the president of the company and if I was in his shoes, I'd be doing the same thing.

[gdog]

I don't either I know they have to sell to keep a buiness running , Just don't need anyone telling people that are down a good bit of money they can't complain. If I had an endless supply of shares I'd sell some also.

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
9m

$NLST From an article yesterday—Patent Litigation Update 2024—"Of course, the vast majority of patent infringement actions (~97%) are settled. But when cases are tried, plaintiffs tend to win. Likely due to the high clear and convincing standard to invalidate a patent and the presumption of validity that is attached to patents, patent holders prevail more often than not in infringement actions. For example, over the last several years it has been reported that the trial success rates of patent holders are 52% with bench trials and 74% with juries."

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/patent-litigation-update-2024-6285186/

[100lbStriper]

i personally have no problem with his or gails sells. i'd be selling as well !!!

[gdog]

People are down huge amounts of money that they invested, they own a piece of the company and have a right to grumble if they want. They also are out working , making a living not setting on thier asses Mr. Stokds

there should be no issues with him selling insubstantial amounts he sold 50k.

50k is more than most of us own

[100lbStriper]

USPTO Won't Weigh In On Samsung Chip Patent Fight
https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/1815012

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
12:58 AM

$NLST Regarding Hong's sale—Monday's filing was the "proposed" of today's actual sale—aside being scheduled and to satisfy tax withholding obligations for vested shares, do folks follow how many shares Hong still owns?
The number is steady and not declining—over 5.7 million shares... he sold 50k. This is not the problem holding Netlist back.

Considering he's maintaining the same amount of ownership while selling a small portion of what he is vested, my concern as to the reasons are nonexistent. He has enough skin in the game for others not to be discouraged or suspicious by the trivial amount he sells from time to time. We're invested and so is he, there should be no issues with him selling insubstantial amounts regularly to satisfy whatever obligation he has... he is the CEO after all, while we just sit on our asses and watch the show.
Some think he can do magic in regards to litigation, influence the outcome or pace... we're just all in the same boat as it plays out.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_566689158.png

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
Yesterday 10:17 PM

$NLST Actually, the bottom pic in my previous post that I thought came from a case-text opinion, was in fact quoted from an order, striking projected sales of HBM3E in regards to a running royalty, while lump sum is admissible... but it also stated — "This decision does not preclude Mr. Kennedy from relying on actual sales of HBM3E produced by Micron, should that occur before trial." — which goes to the point I was trying to make... things are different now and changing quickly. By the time Micron 203 trial starts, there's going to be incredible sales numbers and Netlist's damages theories with projections will be based on reality, and should be admissible to the jury.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_566680277.png

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
Yesterday 9:44 PM

$NLST Just to follow up on the HBM3e reference, and provide some context, since we're on the subject.
The top pic below is from Micron's amended stay motion in the 203 case, arguing against going to trial over products (HBM3/E) not commercially released, and therefore proclaiming that Netlist's damages theory is flawed because it's based on speculative projections... well, not anymore.

The bottom pic below goes into Netlist's damages theory—it's from a case-text opinion I found, which describes what to us are redacted parts of the correlating doc from the 203 case—very interesting and I bet future projected sales will end up being underestimated.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_566677687.png

[100lbStriper]

SilviaJ
6:55 PM

$NLST HBM: We commenced volume production and recognized our first revenue from HBM3E in current quarter and now have begun high- volume shipments of our HBM3E product. Customers continue to give strong feedback that our HBM3E solution has a 30% lower power consumption compared to competitors’ solutions.

Our HBM3E product will be a part of Nvidia’s H200 Tensor Core GPUs, and we are making progress on additional platform qualifications with multiple customers.

Our HBM is sold out for calendar 2024 and the overwhelming majority of our 2025 supply has already been allocated. We continue to expect HBM bit share equivalent to our overall DRAM bit share sometime in calendar 2025.
https://stocktwits.com/SilviaJ/message/566660776

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
6:07 PM

$NLST Adding to your point... another aspect with regard to delay is HBM3e. When 203 case started, and even as motions/briefings concluded, Micron claimed to not have started production of HBM3e and argued that fact in order to push for a stay and other dispositive motions/efforts.

Just recently, after the limited stay was imposed right before trial, Micron announced they started production of HBM3e. This IMO is a big development—one Micron couldn't avoid if they want to succeed as a company—putting less concern on the implications to the case/trial stemming from the accused products now being produced.

Delays, as frustrating and negative as they seem at the time, are something that cannot be quantified/analyzed until litigation has concluded... whether the twists and turns are advantageous in the ultimate big picture or not remains to be seen.

[100lbStriper]

SilviaJ
5:26 PM

$NLST The trial delay may actually have been a godsend to NLST. The fact that Micron is making huge strides in revenue will allow jurors to see this quarter's revenue presented in the upcoming court case.

If the trial had taken place a couple months ago, we would never have access to this quarter's huge windfall increase that will benefit NLST in its potential royalty awards.

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
4:56 PM

$NLST Although the 054 & 918 requests for Director Review of FWDs were denied—as expected being the same agency who rendered the decisions—the next and ultimate step for all FWDs of unpatentability is an appeal to the CAFC (Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit), who are the final authority and where we stand a fighting chance—unlike with biased administrative PTAB judges whose standards are lower than Dist Court and the degree of their qualifications is questionable.
Same for the recent denial of 339 Rehearing Request—expect the next step to be CAFC appeal, following suit of the 506 whose CAFC appeal has initiated.
Another thing of interest is that Director Vidal recused herself on this Director Review decision—unlike the previous—which makes me think that Sonny’s FOIA requests on Vidal may have shined a light and put Vidal on notice, forcing her to only now abide by the rules and play "fair"—if you can even call it that—more like less corrupt.
The CAFC will reconcile all FWDs.

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_566644192.png

[100lbStriper]

SilviaJ
4:55 PM

$NLST Revenue up 58% year over year

Memory chips maker Micron reported results ahead of analysts' expectations in Q1 CY2024, with revenue up 57.7% year on year to $5.82 billion. On top of that, next quarter's revenue guidance ($6.6 billion at the midpoint) was surprisingly good and 9.9% above what analysts were expecting.

https://stocktwits.com/SilviaJ/message/566644112

[100lbStriper]

microby
4:19 PM

after fwd on pmic patents Netlist requested a Director Review

was denied

preparation for another case on a higher court, cafc
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_566637076.png

[100lbStriper]

microby
4:11 PM

If interest rates do not change over a longer period of time, the math 🧮 is ultimately somewhat simpler 😉

And again, the FED has not changed!

read the final judgment again
!! NICE 👍🏼 !! (I will wait )
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.211544/gov.uscourts.txed.211544.551.0_1.pdf

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_566635096.png

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
4:05 PM

$NLST Update on Micron628 case Netlist filed in proper venue—TX/Gilstrap—to counter Micron frivolous Idaho suit on bad faith patent assertion. While Micron's isn't a patent case—them being infringers—Netlist did intend 628 to be patent & infringement case, so did Gilstrap when ordering Sched/Case-Mgmt Conf—“purpose of the scheduling conference will be to assign a CLAIM CONSTRUCTION hearing”(top pic)—and gave deadlines.
Micron motioned—"modify the scheduling order entered on Feb14, which includes deadlines relevant only to patent cases”(mid pic)—refuting Gilstrap.😂
Netlist responds—“Adjudicating these claims based on the positions Micron has taken implicates analysis of patent infringement and validity”—“Netlist cannot be found to have asserted claims of patent infringement in“bad faith”unless Micron can prove that Netlist’s claims were “objectively baseless in the sense that no reasonable litigant could realistically expect success on the merits."(btm2) https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.226945/gov.uscourts.txed.226945.21.0.pdf

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_566633577.png

[100lbStriper]

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_566613122.jpg

[100lbStriper]

lets just hope we live long enough to see a better side to all this.

[greese57]

NLST:)$$$ mycrap is ripping at the close when is it our turn?soon i hope

[gooferball]

Keep up the good work brother, hang tough, attitude is everything. Cheers!!

[Jetmek_03052]

Case 2:22-cv-00293-JRG Document 695 Filed 03/19/24

SAMSUNG’S OPPOSITION TO NETLIST’S MOTION TO STRIKE THE
SUPPLEMENTAL REBUTTAL REPORT OF LAUREN KINDLER (DKT. 669)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216364/gov.uscourts.txed.216364.695.0.pdf

[papaphilip]

Nothing exudes confidence more than officers continually selling shares at these low levels. Just gives me the warm and fuzzy.
Grrrr

[100lbStriper]

4 Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership Mar 19, 2024
https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/3210/us-sec-filing.html?shortDesc=Statement%20of%20Changes%20in%20Beneficial%20Ownership&secFilingId=ddf738e1-aca9-40da-b3b1-c745c87f963f&format=convpdf

[cinnamonpee]

Some have been here more than 10 years. It’s ok to vent sometimes. If you’re a true long, I can guarantee that you’ve said a couple of choice words in your head throughout this process. If you say you haven’t, I’d call you a liar.

[100lbStriper]

AGREED 100% on all of it espeacily this part....... There is another process I wish netlist would call upon, the injunction. No more sales of alleged infringing products until this thing has been settled.

see how fast we get settlement when they cant make a billion dollars a month spending a million or two on lawyers.

[100lbStriper]

lol !!! i love it !! nobodies fault but mine, and for the newly celebrated victim class, alls i have to say is this......

HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHHAHHAHAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[100lbStriper]

dont worry about it, i'm not thin skinned. at the moment i was pissed and took your comment the wrong way. hell they even canceled band practice today which is my only night out !! peace........

[mfascuba]

The leeway may actually be a blessing, as it gives them everything they ask for procedurally, and closes off avenues for future appeals.

From that perspective I’m glad they are following the process.

There is another process I wish netlist would call upon, the injunction. No more sales of alleged infringing products until this thing has been settled.

[gooferball]

I'm just wondering how many of us had our arms twisted and were forced to buy into this stock. Those that were in fact made to invest against their will to become stockholders in this company may feel others need to hear them whinge and moan like our new celebrated Victim Class, although the grown ups among us may consider not blaming others for our situational discomforts.

[cinnamonpee]

Sorry Striper. Not busting your balls. I appreciate all the posting you bring here. Just venting about all the leeway the system gives to the infringers without considering the harm it brings to innovators.

[100lbStriper]

time to go play some music......... gonna go hang me a judge tonight, he know he didnt treat me right..... gonna go hang me a judge tonight, he know he didnt treat me right....... if all else fails you'll hear the sunset wail... that man in black aint comin back........

[NewbieDoobyDoo]

"By the early nineteenth century, the British Court of Chancery had become synonymous with procedural dysfunction and injustice."

American justice has become something out of a Dickens novel.

[100lbStriper]

frustrated??? pissed the ef off is more like it. this isnt justice its unaccountable fraud designed to make the less monetized side collapse. this is a big year for nlst on jury trials. i will give this till the end of the year to prove something to me. if i'm not satisfied or comfortable with the outcome i'll dump my position and go for a walk.

but till then, i'll stay BULLISH !!!

fair enough ?

[papaphilip]

None of us has another 20 years, especially Netlist. This is why the shorts have been and very well may continue to win. A literal endless cycle of delays and appeals. Will that mean more offerings and lower prices and better negotiating conditions for the infringers?!? I hope not, but that's what it's been looking like. No win is a win until Netlist collects on a judgement or negotiates a contract and collects on that. Neither of which seems to be in the near future. Meanwhile the company leaders are doing well for themselves selling shares, while us stuckholders, wait and hope and bleed.
If you sense frustration, you're perceptive. I can't even push the Bullish button anymore.