Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If NLST were $50-$100 per share, I'm pretty sure she wouldn't be getting 100k of them. Just more shares available on the market to feed the bears. Those bears do seem insatiable and they seem to have a lot to chew on here.
WHAT?!?! Gail Bought shares?!? That's actually the best news I've seen in a long time.
Ugh... responded to the post and only after did I read the follow up posts. Free shares?!? Of course. Yeah, they don't count. Nevermind my positivity. I feel crappy again.
I know we've had this discussion before , My point was is she worth what they are giving her.
She is cashing these shares in at between $1 and $2 are you saying she has to sell these shares now?
We've had this discussion before. They are her shares. She can do whatever she wants with them. I don't believe her sells are driving the price of this down.
I'm quite sure that anyone who was getting shares at regular intervals (at $0) as part of a salary package would sell them regularly too.
I know what you're going to say. "It doesn't look good". For myself, it doesn't matter. Her sells are eyewash.
I'm sure she hates Samsung, Micron and Google as much as the next shareholder. Lets face it. She is cashing these shares in at between $1 and $2, when if these guys had treated NLST right, they should have been worth $50-$100 a share.
lol I've always had issues with clowns, they dress up all happy but really you have no Idea what they are thinking.
Anyhow thxs then for the clown :+)
how can you give me a clown for my last post??? I was trashing Gail rotflol
Tell that to everyone here thats down 50-75% lol
I'm sure that'll make em all feel better.
GAIL SASAKI
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, has over 30 years of experience in financial planning and strategic transactions in technology companies. She joined Netlist in 2006 and helped take the Company public. Prior to Netlist, Ms. Sasaki served as Senior VP of Finance and Treasurer at eMotion, Inc., previously a subsidiary of Eastman Kodak, CFO of MicroNet Technology, and worked for many years in public accounting with Ernst & Young. Ms. Sasaki holds a BA, Magna Cum Laude, from the University of California Los Angeles and an MBA from the University of Southern California.
Magna Cum Laude from UCLA. Masters from USC. Pretty smart cookie.
But thinking about that we need to get a board as Redoc says, can you imagine if this went to $10.00 on a court win? she would have just made $1 million... seems like 100k shares mite be alittle over done. And what does Gail do again?????
yes I know but thxs for the reminder
Unfortunately, those RSU's are distributed according to the schedule in the plan. Has nothing to do with them knowing NLST is about to win. That would indeed be insider trading.
oh the shoes !!! it doesnt get any better than this !! lol !!
yes her privvy package. i'm done for the day. i cant get nothin right, but she will buy lots more shoes with those shares !!
lol the only good thing I see about it is maybe they know we are about to win huge, think of the shoes Gail can buy with 100k shares at 10.00
NOT purchased. Those are RSU's (restricted stock units). They will become shares after the vesting period.
am i reading this right or were they vested ? as in given. man i'm having a shitty day...
Yes. Those are stock awards. RSU's. Part of her employment package. NOT purchased.
She didn't BUY anything. Check the price. Must have been a gift or award.
Gail: Gave herself 100,000 shares for $0.00
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1282631/000110465924062462/xslF345X05/tm2414723-2_4seq1.xml
Hong: Gave himself 750,000 shares for $0.00
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1282631/000110465924062461/xslF345X05/tm2414723-1_4seq1.xml
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
because i read it wrong !!! lets down grade to minute, irrelevant....... got lost in all my thinking, thx for keeping me honest.
Why is it huge?
Looks like Scarsi denied Sheasby's application, right? As moot? And the other Ex Parte request is being deferred.
Here is Docket 540 filing:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.540.0.pdf
hey they all get away with it we are just the little dawgs that are honest , look again at how our politicans get inside info all the while they are so concerned for us. lol the whole system is corrupt.
NLST get some
Nonprecedential Now were involved in the election??? what next rotflol
22-2173: PARKERVISION, INC. v. VIDAL [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
https://cafc.uscourts.gov/05-16-2024-22-2173-parkervision-inc-v-vidal-rule-36-judgment-22-2173-rule_36_judgment-5-16-2024_2318818/
https://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/22-2173.RULE_36_JUDGMENT.5-16-2024_2318818.pdf
I would agree whole heartly time for us to be the winners from here on out.
They're playing games again with the stock price. I see a lot of head fakes going on in order to cover their shorts. They've sure caused us a lot of misery over the past few years so I would love to see some of that misery returned to them. I would call it "Devine Justice".
Looks like someone else is setting in court watching case unfold, thats a huge short position and someone is covering bigtime today.
For anyone tht happens to follow bottom swing plays I added a chat . I realize not many follow but if you do and want to discuss a stock go here . https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=42983
unfortunately no I did just add 615 shares of NLST
Hope you saved a little of your BLOZF !
some one just bought 27672 shares @ $1.37 you think short covering lol
Case 8:20-cv-00993-MCS-ADS Document 544 Filed 05/16/24
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.544.0.pdf
Still pretty light volume. Wait until the Netlist wins the BOC case. I'll bet then you'll some heavy volume.
Clown boy must have taken the day off.
some pretty large buys coming in, i assume covering. 3k 5k
this is all that counts..........Either way, Netlist wins.
Just read all the testimony in the comments. Great read. I cannot help but think that any Jury listening to it would agree that Samsung broke the contract and intentionally STIFFED Netlist. Either that or the Jury would feel that the contract was so ambiguous that it should just be thrown out.
Either way, Netlist wins.
LOTS OF NEWS CAME OUT last night over day 2 of trial. we're crushing it, hope the jury crush's them, and we are winning........... verdict friday
robcobb
6:25 AM
$NLST After reading the Law-360 articles, I wish whoever wrote those articles would be at the upcoming Micron trial, I could just sit back and enjoy the trial without having to focus on taking notes. I kinda think that person had the transcript of what took place to give that kind of detail. I will take notes and give my best account of what takes place especially the high points,but I am afraid it will fall short of the Law-360 articles,I know my limitations! Hopefully I can give a good enough account of what takes place to give everyone a good account of the big picture of the trial. Me and Prime 311 have communicated and he will be there Tuesday through Thursday he has obligations on the other two days. I will be there all five days and am especially interested in reporting the final day verdict! We shall see soon!
NLST “Netlist’s projected revenues went from $300m annually to negative growth within a few years”
“Netlist lost over $1b in sales”
many investors still don't know today that netlist is a sleeping giant, there's no point in looking for the wrong data, hong here contains the most delicate information and the Samsung case of 2023 confirms what it says.
Netlist lost over $ billion in sales because of Samsung, sooner or later Samsung will pay billions of $ in damages. I hope that this case brings to light the darkness of Samsung and above all that Netlist can take criminal action against them!!!
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573116540.png
NLST If the jury agrees that Samsung tried to intentionally bankrupt Netlist, it could be a ticking time bomb in Google's case. Samsung had no reason to bankrupt Nlst, Samsung had plenty of resellers at the time. The terms were all roughly the same. Why would they care who resells their products? But at the time Google already knew it was losing the case in California. And Google was known to be Samsung's biggest customer at the time. If you could pull up the correspondence between Google and Samsung at the time, a lot of things would fall into place.
https://stocktwits.com/NikithosTwits/message/573110417
Netlist: “Samsung intentionally manipulates parts supply chain”...Suit filed in U.S. court
“Samsung’s attempt to intentionally worsen Netlist’s competitiveness”
https://www.g-enews.com/ko-kr/news/article/news_all/202405160448554611e7e8286d56_1/article.html
NLST Day 2 - BOC trial report
Part 1 (more in the comments) https://www.law360.com/articles/1837704/ex-samsung-exec-called-netlist-leaders-morons-jury-hears
May 15, 2024, 10:06 PM EDT
A former sales executive for Samsung testified Wednesday to a California federal jury that he made fun of Netlist executives in an email to his boss as they were repeatedly trying to secure product deliveries, calling them "morons" who didn't understand that "nobody likes or wants them as a customer."
Neal Knuth, who left Samsung last year, testified on the second day of the trial in which Netlist Inc. is accusing Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. of breaching a contract that required Samsung to supply it with crucial NAND and DRAM memory parts. When Samsung broke the deal it caused Netlist's business to crater, and Samsung did it intentionally to cause harm, Netlist alleges.
the rest is here............
https://stocktwits.com/FrankFromYahoo/message/573108239
NLST Article on day 2 of BOC trial.
'Samsung Ex-Executive Mocked Netlist Executives in Email'
"In a stunning revelation, a previous Samsung sales executive admitted in court to making derogatory remarks about Netlist executives in communication with his supervisor. The California federal jury heard on Wednesday how the former employee disparaged the Netlist team amid ongoing negotiations over product deliveries."
"The executive, speaking under oath, described Netlist’s executives as inept, using the term “morons” in an email suggesting that their presence was unwelcome in the customer community."
"This testimony throws a stark light on the inner workings of business negotiations and relationships, particularly the challenge Netlist faced in its attempts to secure Samsung as a partnering supplier."
https://smartphonemagazine.nl/en/2024/05/16/samsung-ex-executive-mocked-netlist-executives-in-email/
Ex-Samsung Exec Called Netlist Leaders 'Morons,' Jury Hears
https://www.law360.co.uk/articles/1837704/ex-samsung-exec-called-netlist-leaders-morons-jury-hears
Followers
|
307
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
3
|
Posts (Total)
|
25982
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators papaphilip gdog 100lbStriper Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs |
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote:
https://netlist.com/
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |