News 
Market Data 
Discover
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
as long as nothing gets delayed i'm with ya 100%!!!
yes i see lol !!!
nice, but you could of got them cheaper!!!! j/k'n... but ya coulda'''
our mark scarsi from the boc case................
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/mark-scarsi-hunter-biden-tax-charges-case-rcna128666
Stokd
42m
$NLST I just post examples as they come up wherever/whatever I'm reading, not searching in particular.
Another entry in the "PTAB got it wrong" series — 'Victory for Virtek Patent as CAFC Schools PTAB on Proper Motivation to Combine Analysis' — "“This case involves nothing other than an assertion that because two coordinate systems were disclosed in a prior art reference and were therefore ‘known,’ that satisfies the motivation to combine analysis. That is an error as a matter of law. It does not suffice to simply be known. A reason for combining must exist.” – CAFC opinion"
"In a precedential decision authored by Chief Judge Moore, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Wednesday partially reversed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) ruling that certain claims of Virtek Vision International’s patent on a method for aligning a laser projector were unpatentable, finding the Board erred as a matter of law in its analysis."
https://ipwatchdog.com/2024/03/27/victory-virtek-patent-cafc-schools-ptab-motivation-combine/id=174700/
just doooooooo ittttttt!!!!!!!!!!
NLST short interest down again this last report.
Feb 29 - 9,643,891 shares short
Mar 15 - 9,294,621 shares short
Down - 349,270 shares (-3.62%)
it'll be like winning the lotto for all here when it finally goes....
willie sutton coined it perfectly, ''because that's where the money is''.
You and Redo are right Naz is the place to be.
well I believe we should be there but then we would have to have a board and more rules and more people having to make the decisions .
I think when most of this crap is settled Hong will want us back there.
the NAZ BABY !!!
lol !!! i knew you would eventually say that, but its ok, one of these days !!!
lol yup i remember , i'll see if Hong will talk to me about it.
but really our day is coming its just a matter of weather some of us will still be alive to see it.
in the mean time play a few of these that I have three here that you could have bought and made $1.00 on each palt nuvb nova look at the last 3-5 days on them you could hve bought 3000 more shares of nlst lol
not all companies are corrupt.
Come on Dog. You already know the answer to this.
Lady Justice is portrayed wearing a blindfold. Any judge in any case is supposed to represent Lady Justice. While I'm sure Gilstrap and Scarsi have their own opinion about who is guilty here, they have to put aside those opinions and give EACH SIDE every opportunity to prove their side of the argument. If the law allows ANY ploy to be used in their case, the judge is duty bound to let each side use it.
As far as injunctions are concerned? If he was to use an injunction of sales of the accused products? I'd think to be a judge that is completely "blindfolded" until all the evidence is in? He'd have to use it against BOTH sides, while it's decided if the patent claims by Netlist are finally judged as patentable (eventually by the CFAC). I think that such an injunction would certainly hurt Netlist far more than it would hurt Samsung. Netlist is very dependent on revenue supplied by Hynix chip sales at the moment.
That being said - I'm like everyone else here - I think that Samsung, Micron and Google are guilty as sin. Am I prejudiced by my stock ownership? No doubt! I want to see Netlist win.
Unfortunately, I expect more delays amid more appeals.
Unfortunately, it's been that way for a number of years. The legal system bends over backwards and gives EVERY avenue available for accused parties to use, in an effort to "beat the rap". We can see that is happening. We also know that eventually, there will be no more avenues for them to use.
Yup, it is aggravating that it is taking so much time. I look at it like chess. In every game, one player gains the upper hand. Then they force the opposing player to make moves, in an effort to avoid checkmate. As the game progresses, there are fewer and fewer moves that the opposing player can make.
Finally, inevitably, checkmate occurs.
i think its just samscum wanting to push the date out further and further as long as they can get away with it. after all they arent going to win so why not keep delaying. i also think the starting of the trial will commence on that may 6th date because samscum initially proposed that date after saying 1-2 weeks would be good. that 7 page doc explains it rather well..........
pg 5 and 6............
Given that Netlist’s lead counsel will be in Texas preparing back-toback trials starting on April 4 through the April 29 trial, the next available date that
lead counsel can attend the FPTC is May 6, 2024. Netlist will be substantially
prejudiced if its chosen counsel is unable to attend the FPTC due to a pre-existing
conflict.
In contrast, Samsung will suffer no prejudice if the FPTC is reset for May 6,
2024. Netlist reached out to Samsung on March 22, 2024—the day the Court’s order
setting the FPTC date was issued. Sheasby Decl. ¶ 4. Samsung did not substantively respond until March 25, 2024, when it declined to agree. On March 26, 2024 the
parties orally met and conferred. Id. Samsung acknowledged that it has no conflict on
May 6, 2024. Samsung’s only basis for opposing Netlist’s request is that May 6, 2024
is just over one week before the beginning of trial. Id. ¶ 5.
Samsung’s concern is unfounded and directly contradicted by its prior
representation to this Court that the FPTC should take place one week before trial.
The original FPTC date (March 18, 2024) was set with exactly this spacing before the
original trial date (March 26, 2024) at the request of Samsung’s own counsel. Dkt.
391 (MSJ Hearing Tr.) at 12: 2-4 (“The only request that I would make, Your Honor,
is if we could do the final pretrial conference just the week before because of
scheduling issues, that would be appreciated.”). This spacing of the trial and FPTC
dates requested by Samsung to accommodate its own counsel’s schedule, and adopted
by the Court, is equally appropriate now. Samsung claims that the case has somehow
become more complicated, but the case is largely unchanged since the original setting.
Moreover, Samsung has a large legal team (at least seven attorneys attended the last
hearing, including four partners at counsel table) that should have no difficulty
preparing for a 3-4 day trial starting more than a week after May 6.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.483.0.pdf
we'll be ok, but the sooner this happens i'll be happier. then again in reading sheasby's demeanor he doesnt make me feel like he's pissed off over it. lets face it, both sides are ready to go regardless of whats said, and that time slot is open. they know it and the judge does as well. we'll know soon enough..........
They should. The court case DBMM has actually won (#0463) has been declared final on 08/11/2023, and that Samsung willfully infringed on several of Netlists patents.
I don't know why they haven't, since that date. At some point, I assume we will find out why.
i wonder if sk will ever give nlst a plug for their tec ?
|
Followers
|
307
|
Posters
|
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
1
|
Posts (Total)
|
25994
|
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
| Moderators papaphilip gdog 100lbStriper Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs | |||
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote: 
https://netlist.com/
brings over two decades of high-tech management experience to Netlist. He most recently served as President of Infinilink, a DSL equipment manufacturer, and as executive vice president of Viking Components, Inc. Prior to that, he spent 15 years with LG where he held various senior management positions in the U.S and Korea. Mr. Hong holds an MS in technology management from Pepperdine University and a BS in economics from Virginia Commonwealth University.
AI
