NetList Inc (NLST)

[Jetmek_03052]

Come on Dog. You already know the answer to this.

Lady Justice is portrayed wearing a blindfold. Any judge in any case is supposed to represent Lady Justice. While I'm sure Gilstrap and Scarsi have their own opinion about who is guilty here, they have to put aside those opinions and give EACH SIDE every opportunity to prove their side of the argument. If the law allows ANY ploy to be used in their case, the judge is duty bound to let each side use it.

As far as injunctions are concerned? If he was to use an injunction of sales of the accused products? I'd think to be a judge that is completely "blindfolded" until all the evidence is in? He'd have to use it against BOTH sides, while it's decided if the patent claims by Netlist are finally judged as patentable (eventually by the CFAC). I think that such an injunction would certainly hurt Netlist far more than it would hurt Samsung. Netlist is very dependent on revenue supplied by Hynix chip sales at the moment.

That being said - I'm like everyone else here - I think that Samsung, Micron and Google are guilty as sin. Am I prejudiced by my stock ownership? No doubt! I want to see Netlist win.

Unfortunately, I expect more delays amid more appeals.