NetList Inc (NLST)

[gdog]

I must be upsetting by your pm to me huh the vulgarity really ads a nice touch lol sorry I upset you.

[gdog]

I must be upsetting by your pm to me huh the vulgarity really ads a nice touch lol sorry I upset you.

[gdog]

Who said any different?
and one more thing as a share holder it is my bussiness to know whats happening with the shares of this company.
Who said any different?
I do not know her financial situation, so I do not know if she has to sell the shares. None of my business - or anyone else's for that matter.

ahh I think you said it
No one said you don't have the right to your opinion.

Maybe you should write the company and express your displeasure. Threaten to sell your shares. Tell her you think she's doing a disservice to the other loyal shareholders.
Maybe you should chill alittle.

[greese57]

NLST:)$$$ here we go man $$$

[100lbStriper]

NLST Micron's answer to Judge Gilstrap's deadline Equitable Defences, Prior Art, etc. This is for the 294 case in Texas stating Monday.

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573249417.jpg

[100lbStriper]

294..........123 May 16, 2024

NOTICE Defendants' Updated Notice of Final Election of Invalidity Theories, Prior Art References/Combinations, and Equitable Defenses by MICRON TECHNOLOGY TEXAS, LLC, Micron Semiconductor Products Inc, Micron Technology Inc re 120 Order (Rueckheim, Michael) (Entered: 05/16/2024)

Main Doc­ument

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

[100lbStriper]

NLST Micron Case 294 (912) - Anyone seen an update on Gilstraps order from Tuesday? Well, Micron, you still have 1h left

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573247563.png

[gdog]

Well I'll tell you she doesn't have to sell them because if she did she wouldn't be holding 282,933 shares already.

Again we need a board to stop mr. HOG from giving such a lucartive deal. err HONG. It wasn't a question of whether she sells them or not it was is she worth what she's gettin . maybe go back and read my posts again.

and one more thing as a share holder it is my bussiness to know whats happening with the shares of this company.

[Jetmek_03052]

are you saying she has to sell these shares now?

I do not know her financial situation, so I do not know if she has to sell the shares. None of my business - or anyone else's for that matter.

Like I said. If you were an employee of a company, and you were getting shares at regular intervals, as part of your salary package - at ZERO cost? Would you say to yourself "Oh geez, it won't look good if I sell these shares - I'd better not".

I see what you're saying. But screw that. If they were promised me as part of my salary package, I'd sell them when able to.

[papaphilip]

If NLST were $50-$100 per share, I'm pretty sure she wouldn't be getting 100k of them. Just more shares available on the market to feed the bears. Those bears do seem insatiable and they seem to have a lot to chew on here.

[papaphilip]

WHAT?!?! Gail Bought shares?!? That's actually the best news I've seen in a long time.

Ugh... responded to the post and only after did I read the follow up posts. Free shares?!? Of course. Yeah, they don't count. Nevermind my positivity. I feel crappy again.

[gdog]

I know we've had this discussion before , My point was is she worth what they are giving her.


She is cashing these shares in at between $1 and $2 are you saying she has to sell these shares now?

[Jetmek_03052]

We've had this discussion before. They are her shares. She can do whatever she wants with them. I don't believe her sells are driving the price of this down.

I'm quite sure that anyone who was getting shares at regular intervals (at $0) as part of a salary package would sell them regularly too.

I know what you're going to say. "It doesn't look good". For myself, it doesn't matter. Her sells are eyewash.

I'm sure she hates Samsung, Micron and Google as much as the next shareholder. Lets face it. She is cashing these shares in at between $1 and $2, when if these guys had treated NLST right, they should have been worth $50-$100 a share.

[gdog]

lol I've always had issues with clowns, they dress up all happy but really you have no Idea what they are thinking.
Anyhow thxs then for the clown :+)

[gdog]

how can you give me a clown for my last post??? I was trashing Gail rotflol

[gdog]

Tell that to everyone here thats down 50-75% lol
I'm sure that'll make em all feel better.

[Jetmek_03052]

GAIL SASAKI

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, has over 30 years of experience in financial planning and strategic transactions in technology companies. She joined Netlist in 2006 and helped take the Company public. Prior to Netlist, Ms. Sasaki served as Senior VP of Finance and Treasurer at eMotion, Inc., previously a subsidiary of Eastman Kodak, CFO of MicroNet Technology, and worked for many years in public accounting with Ernst & Young. Ms. Sasaki holds a BA, Magna Cum Laude, from the University of California Los Angeles and an MBA from the University of Southern California.

Magna Cum Laude from UCLA. Masters from USC. Pretty smart cookie.

[gdog]

But thinking about that we need to get a board as Redoc says, can you imagine if this went to $10.00 on a court win? she would have just made $1 million... seems like 100k shares mite be alittle over done. And what does Gail do again?????

[gdog]

yes I know but thxs for the reminder

[Jetmek_03052]

Unfortunately, those RSU's are distributed according to the schedule in the plan. Has nothing to do with them knowing NLST is about to win. That would indeed be insider trading.

[100lbStriper]

oh the shoes !!! it doesnt get any better than this !! lol !!

[100lbStriper]

yes her privvy package. i'm done for the day. i cant get nothin right, but she will buy lots more shoes with those shares !!

[gdog]

lol the only good thing I see about it is maybe they know we are about to win huge, think of the shoes Gail can buy with 100k shares at 10.00

[Jetmek_03052]

NOT purchased. Those are RSU's (restricted stock units). They will become shares after the vesting period.

[100lbStriper]

am i reading this right or were they vested ? as in given. man i'm having a shitty day...

[Jetmek_03052]

Yes. Those are stock awards. RSU's. Part of her employment package. NOT purchased.

[dingodave]

She didn't BUY anything. Check the price. Must have been a gift or award.

[100lbStriper]

hong buying to ????????? https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/3210/us-sec-filing.html?shortDesc=Statement%20of%20Changes%20in%20Beneficial%20Ownership&format=convpdf&secFilingId=9a60fe22-60f5-49f8-8e1d-728ca9b98e76

[Boxsterfan]

Gail: Gave herself 100,000 shares for $0.00
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1282631/000110465924062462/xslF345X05/tm2414723-2_4seq1.xml
Hong: Gave himself 750,000 shares for $0.00
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1282631/000110465924062461/xslF345X05/tm2414723-1_4seq1.xml

🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

[100lbStriper]

GAIL BUYS 100K SHARES.......... https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/3210/us-sec-filing.html?secFilingId=28a3f7a5-baaa-4bb3-80f6-7c33f3056155&shortDesc=Statement%20of%20Changes%20in%20Beneficial%20Ownership&format=convpdf

[100lbStriper]

because i read it wrong !!! lets down grade to minute, irrelevant....... got lost in all my thinking, thx for keeping me honest.

[NewbieDoobyDoo]

Huge?

[Jetmek_03052]

Why is it huge?

Looks like Scarsi denied Sheasby's application, right? As moot? And the other Ex Parte request is being deferred.

Here is Docket 540 filing:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.540.0.pdf

[gdog]

hey they all get away with it we are just the little dawgs that are honest , look again at how our politicans get inside info all the while they are so concerned for us. lol the whole system is corrupt.

NLST get some

[100lbStriper]

vidal should go to prison.

[gdog]

Nonprecedential Now were involved in the election??? what next rotflol

[100lbStriper]

22-2173: PARKERVISION, INC. v. VIDAL [RULE 36 JUDGMENT], Nonprecedential
https://cafc.uscourts.gov/05-16-2024-22-2173-parkervision-inc-v-vidal-rule-36-judgment-22-2173-rule_36_judgment-5-16-2024_2318818/

https://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/22-2173.RULE_36_JUDGMENT.5-16-2024_2318818.pdf

[gdog]

I would agree whole heartly time for us to be the winners from here on out.

[choo choo trader]

They're playing games again with the stock price. I see a lot of head fakes going on in order to cover their shorts. They've sure caused us a lot of misery over the past few years so I would love to see some of that misery returned to them. I would call it "Devine Justice".

[gdog]

Looks like someone else is setting in court watching case unfold, thats a huge short position and someone is covering bigtime today.

[gdog]

For anyone tht happens to follow bottom swing plays I added a chat . I realize not many follow but if you do and want to discuss a stock go here . https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=42983

[Jetmek_03052]

I'd strongly suspect that! 😆

[gdog]

unfortunately no I did just add 615 shares of NLST

[Carthnel]

Hope you saved a little of your BLOZF !

[gdog]

some one just bought 27672 shares @ $1.37 you think short covering lol

[Jetmek_03052]

Case 8:20-cv-00993-MCS-ADS Document 544 Filed 05/16/24
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.544.0.pdf

Defendant Samsung Electronics
Notice and EX PARTE of
Application for Sanctions

Samsung trying to hide what this guy said. I wonder what the judge will decide? Hopefully deny the request

[Jetmek_03052]

Still pretty light volume. Wait until the Netlist wins the BOC case. I'll bet then you'll some heavy volume.

Clown boy must have taken the day off.

[gdog]

some pretty large buys coming in, i assume covering. 3k 5k

[100lbStriper]

this is all that counts..........Either way, Netlist wins.

[Jetmek_03052]

Just read all the testimony in the comments. Great read. I cannot help but think that any Jury listening to it would agree that Samsung broke the contract and intentionally STIFFED Netlist. Either that or the Jury would feel that the contract was so ambiguous that it should just be thrown out.

Either way, Netlist wins.