News 
Market Data 
Discover
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
NLST Netlist gets their way! 🔥 "The Court, having considered the materials and arguments submitted by Plaintiff, Netlist, Inc. in its Ex Parte Application to Reset the Final Pre-Trial Conference Due to Conflict with Previously Set Trial (“the Application”), and the declaration of Jason Sheasby submitted in support thereof, and having found good cause, hereby ORDERS as follows:
The Application is GRANTED. The Final Pre-Trial Conference is set for May 6, 2024, at 9:00am 2:00 p.m."
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_567753176.png
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.485.0.pdf
as long as nothing gets delayed i'm with ya 100%!!!
yes i see lol !!!
nice, but you could of got them cheaper!!!! j/k'n... but ya coulda'''
our mark scarsi from the boc case................
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/mark-scarsi-hunter-biden-tax-charges-case-rcna128666
Stokd
42m
$NLST I just post examples as they come up wherever/whatever I'm reading, not searching in particular.
Another entry in the "PTAB got it wrong" series — 'Victory for Virtek Patent as CAFC Schools PTAB on Proper Motivation to Combine Analysis' — "“This case involves nothing other than an assertion that because two coordinate systems were disclosed in a prior art reference and were therefore ‘known,’ that satisfies the motivation to combine analysis. That is an error as a matter of law. It does not suffice to simply be known. A reason for combining must exist.” – CAFC opinion"
"In a precedential decision authored by Chief Judge Moore, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Wednesday partially reversed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) ruling that certain claims of Virtek Vision International’s patent on a method for aligning a laser projector were unpatentable, finding the Board erred as a matter of law in its analysis."
https://ipwatchdog.com/2024/03/27/victory-virtek-patent-cafc-schools-ptab-motivation-combine/id=174700/
just doooooooo ittttttt!!!!!!!!!!
NLST short interest down again this last report.
Feb 29 - 9,643,891 shares short
Mar 15 - 9,294,621 shares short
Down - 349,270 shares (-3.62%)
it'll be like winning the lotto for all here when it finally goes....
willie sutton coined it perfectly, ''because that's where the money is''.
You and Redo are right Naz is the place to be.
well I believe we should be there but then we would have to have a board and more rules and more people having to make the decisions .
I think when most of this crap is settled Hong will want us back there.
the NAZ BABY !!!
lol !!! i knew you would eventually say that, but its ok, one of these days !!!
lol yup i remember , i'll see if Hong will talk to me about it.
but really our day is coming its just a matter of weather some of us will still be alive to see it.
in the mean time play a few of these that I have three here that you could have bought and made $1.00 on each palt nuvb nova look at the last 3-5 days on them you could hve bought 3000 more shares of nlst lol
not all companies are corrupt.
Come on Dog. You already know the answer to this.
Lady Justice is portrayed wearing a blindfold. Any judge in any case is supposed to represent Lady Justice. While I'm sure Gilstrap and Scarsi have their own opinion about who is guilty here, they have to put aside those opinions and give EACH SIDE every opportunity to prove their side of the argument. If the law allows ANY ploy to be used in their case, the judge is duty bound to let each side use it.
As far as injunctions are concerned? If he was to use an injunction of sales of the accused products? I'd think to be a judge that is completely "blindfolded" until all the evidence is in? He'd have to use it against BOTH sides, while it's decided if the patent claims by Netlist are finally judged as patentable (eventually by the CFAC). I think that such an injunction would certainly hurt Netlist far more than it would hurt Samsung. Netlist is very dependent on revenue supplied by Hynix chip sales at the moment.
That being said - I'm like everyone else here - I think that Samsung, Micron and Google are guilty as sin. Am I prejudiced by my stock ownership? No doubt! I want to see Netlist win.
Unfortunately, I expect more delays amid more appeals.
Unfortunately, it's been that way for a number of years. The legal system bends over backwards and gives EVERY avenue available for accused parties to use, in an effort to "beat the rap". We can see that is happening. We also know that eventually, there will be no more avenues for them to use.
Yup, it is aggravating that it is taking so much time. I look at it like chess. In every game, one player gains the upper hand. Then they force the opposing player to make moves, in an effort to avoid checkmate. As the game progresses, there are fewer and fewer moves that the opposing player can make.
Finally, inevitably, checkmate occurs.
|
Followers
|
307
|
Posters
|
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
1
|
Posts (Total)
|
25994
|
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
| Moderators papaphilip gdog 100lbStriper Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs | |||
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote: 
https://netlist.com/
brings over two decades of high-tech management experience to Netlist. He most recently served as President of Infinilink, a DSL equipment manufacturer, and as executive vice president of Viking Components, Inc. Prior to that, he spent 15 years with LG where he held various senior management positions in the U.S and Korea. Mr. Hong holds an MS in technology management from Pepperdine University and a BS in economics from Virginia Commonwealth University.
AI
