Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
GOOD MORNING EVERYONE
GO $MCIC
Extra butter..... I hope.
Bought a container of it last week lol
It's hiding in the acquisition/merger target and that is exactly why Ben filed what he did to prevent shell risk/status. It only makes sense to a few people right now. All public info but no one seems to believe it. Not that I care. It will be the biggest curve ball that I have ever seen thrown in my history of reading OTC news. But hey. We have plenty of popcorn.
If this alleged revenue does not show up in a legal financial document, potential investors assume it doesn't exist.
Agree. But who will make it rain this time? I am retired.
I’m still betting on what I saw was real sells now maybe my guess of 100 mil might be wrong but I think it’s between 60-75 mil the reason guess was so big before because it was hard to know how much was sold that weren’t containers (pallets who knows to hard to figure out once they said you had to buy so many ) but at last I knew we were close to 100 mil. So where is it hiding
Or .0018. If you can get your hands on 12 shares of MCIC, you will have a little more than a penny in shares. Now, that's big money.
True except for the name Brutus
How did find out how many shares I have
1 share of MCIC + 1 share of MCIC = more money? I had a hard time with math.
MCIC = a triple zero PPS with horrible volume after 5+ years. The pushers need to be fed the truth now and then.
MCIC - To Uranus
Mcic = money
Et tu, Brute? MCIC $
If potential investors can now buy shares at brokerage firms like Schwab, this is a bad sign for shareholders. Why? Because there is zippo volume more than two hours into the trading day, indicating no buying interest from potential investors. The positive spin/blather from the pushers has been worthless as the PPS sits at triple zeros. Also, in what decade will the "management team" get the quotes warning taken down from the OTC?
GOOD MORNING EVERYONE
GO $MCIC
True......there goes your Maestro persona..........
Capital A makes me wonder if my opinion helps or hurts? Any news hits and I don't have an opinion Anymore. I guess at that point everything becomes fact.
And trust me. I like a good story more than money. "Because the greed that fuels investors in a market that does not appreciate a good story?? Will never taste success." That will go down as a famous quote one day. It's how I feel about things. My first score in the stock market was the dirty bastards at the FDA being forced to approve a cancer drug they were paid under the table to not approve. The stock was on the verge on BK and on it's last chance. But it when it made headline news..... The story was in place and they had to approve the drug. It all starts with looking at the story behind a company. Fast flips based on trading algorithms are a completely different ball game.
Your right and trust me I think about it daily
Well if it’s some company they have between him and Tony there were no worries sales are hid somewhere
Thanks. What really makes the story more interesting is Ben's silence. I finally see why. Had he released news these thing would be fixed in a year or longer???? OMG. When you are in poo poo up to your eye balls it's best to say....... Nothing. The comeback story here could be a hell of a thing.
I could not find a pink that has dropped shell status, dropped shell risk status, went OTC current info to regain quotation, and then gains the market makers and solicited quotation back? After the rule change??? All that??? Search Google all you want and filter by news. People, this never happens. But he put his money in to do it and got it done. That never happens. What if MCIC was about to be set up for the biggest run in OTC history and only a few people read this post before it happens? There are only a few of you reading and MCIC has already done the impossible. Search the internet and show me any OTC company that pulled that list off. Fully reporting NASDAQ or NYSE companies that fall to the OTC do not count because they were in dollar land before the fall to OTC tier and they have the incentive and capital to fix quotation fast. Think about that for a minute.
nice approach on Analyzing the situation
It's actually turning into an interesting story because I was thinking about something last year. If "whatever" Ben had planned was off the table because of the delays and issues caused by the shell status/risk junk? My logical mind says the ticker would not have been worth getting current and all in hopes of something new developing. I think he would have walked away. Not put more time, money, and effort into fixing this stuff. It also validates that whatever he is bringing in also gave him more time than a lot of other situations can allow. Has to be something all parties involved want to see done. Just a guess on my part.
I’d love someone to show me a pinki the owners in pumping his own money into like Ben is. For mcic
Yes does not make sense for MCIC to show ace in the hole (MERGER, SALES, REVENUE, Digital Watch, PR's ) until Market Makers are in play and OTC..FINRA are 100% satisfied......this is when the snow ball starts rolling down the big hill................hope and pray.........
He had to put more in because he is moving forward with something. Getting things fixed with the OTC was only part of the expenses the last few years. A lot of professional/legal expenses in the last filing. They never said what Adam was paid to do but his specialty is legal on mergers/acquisitions. Previous sale transactions posted on their website could be sitting in the merger/acquisition target as the deal would have certainly been delayed with the stock issue that was recently cleared up. Someone is in it to win it. The big question is - "What's up MCIC?" Wish we had a countdown timer.............
No problem. We noticed more market makers on level 2 this morning.
We all know it’s coming off.
I’m still betting Ben’s put more money into mcic this year
Thanks for doing a check for us on that .
In OTC markets, the market maker is a principal trader who buys from sellers at a “bid” price and sells to buyers at a higher “ask” price. The market maker's objective is to make a profit from the bid-ask spread.
Principal-based market making is a basic financial service that provides transaction immediacy to other traders and liquidity in financial markets. Market-making arrangements run the gamut, from rapid anonymous trading on exchanges, to sporadic bilateral OTC trading among institutions, to occasional one-off new issue underwritings.
Specific market trading protocols vary from market to market. In exchange markets, market makers offer to trade when a customer submits an order or requests a quote. An order may be submitted at whatever price currently prevails in the market (a market order) or for execution at a fixed price (a limit order). Limit orders are held by market makers for potential execution when the limit order price becomes competitive.
Institutional investors usually trade large blocks either by trading with an OTC market maker, by trading in an off-exchange order-matching market (a "dark pool") or by dribbling out small orders over an
extended time in a retail market.[2] When a block trade market maker accepts a buy or sell order, it usually negotiates the price with its counterparty, while simultaneously searching for offsetting orders and hedging any portion of the block for which it has no offsetting order.
A conventional secondary market or derivative contract trading agreement between a market maker and its counterparties usually states that the market maker is not a fiduciary in its usual trading business.[3] A different arrangement usually holds in primary markets and secondary offerings for corporate securities, where the market maker is usually contracted to be a fiduciary agent for the seller.
In a primary market for corporate instruments, a market maker buys a large block of stock or bonds from an issuer and sells it to investors as a principal; this process is called underwriting. An underwriting contract may specify a fixed purchase price for the underwriter, with a higher fixed price for investors.
Alternatively, the issue may be distributed on a best-efforts basis, in which an underwriter sells to investors without guaranteeing a price. Unlike most market makers in the secondary market, an underwriter in the primary market is usually a fiduciary working on behalf of the issuer.[4]
A secondary offering is an underwriting transaction in which an investor that owns a very large block of an issue engages an underwriter to resell the block. In this activity, the underwriter is also usually a fiduciary. Thus, while a secondary offering is much like a block trade in size and execution, the contract governing the trading relationship between the seller and the market maker is different.
Secondary Markets: Order-Driven vs. Quote-Driven
Parallel exchange and OTC markets exist for many financial contracts, including securities and derivatives. Small orders are usually organized as exchanges, and market making on them is referred to as order-driven.
In contrast, large block orders of the same instruments are dominated by institutional investors trading OTC. In OTC markets, market making is mostly quote-driven.
In an order-driven market, market makers submit a flow of public buy and sell orders that compete directly with orders from other traders. Other traders may trade directly with each other if their order prices are better than a market maker’s posted orders.
In contrast, in quote-driven markets, a potential trader requests a private quote from a market maker. A quote given is for both sides of the market with bid and asked prices, quantities on both sides and a time limit (perhaps a few minutes) while the quote is good. Then a potential customer can quickly try to solicit competing quotes from other market makers and execute the trade at the best bid or offer.
Trade Execution and Position Management
In order-driven markets, market makers compete to capture flow trading. By flow trading, we mean frequent execution of standard sized orders (round lots) submitted by ordinary traders and other market makers.
Bid-ask spreads are generally quite narrow, due to competition from other traders’ orders and other market makers competing to capture the public order flow. This type of trading commonly occurs on stock exchanges, futures exchanges and options exchanges worldwide.
In quote-driven markets, orders come to a market maker sporadically. Some trading activity is like flow trading, as customers quickly hit quotes for standard sized trades (usually around $1 million minimum) of simple instruments like foreign exchange, or FX, contracts or U.S. treasuries.
Other trades are tailored deals that have negotiated terms. Such trades may involve complex derivatives, large blocks of instruments like corporate bonds, swaps, foreign exchange, repos or forward delivery of physical commodities.
For large trades, a market maker usually tries to assemble a position to prehedge a customer’s pending buy order, or to find another buyer for the position in a customer’s pending sell order, before the initial customer’s trade is executed. An OTC market maker therefore tries to set up both sides of a large or complex order before either side of the trade is executed.
Although this might appear to be like front-running a booked limit order in an order driven market, it is a normal and customary risk management practice in a quote-driven OTC block market.
Market Making in Perspective
In a series of recent prosecutions, the government has implied that a market maker in a quote-driven OTC market should be able to provide the same execution profile for a bespoke block trade as that which occurs for a small round lot trade in an order-driven market.
At the same time, the government has asserted that a block trader’s obligation to its customer is like that of an underwriter in a secondary offering. This hypothetical combination of market-making practices is based on several misapprehensions.
In a quote-driven market the market maker agrees to trade a specified quantity at a quoted price in a bilateral transaction. To do this, the market maker must acquire either orders or inventory in advance, at prices that gives it a chance for a profit on the transaction. Otherwise, the market maker would not transact.
Acquiring large blocks of orders or instruments to sell at a quoted price subjects the market maker to risk while holding the order or position, which must be managed. A market maker therefore prudently acquires orders or inventory and sets prices in a manner that allows itself to manage risk and try to avoid a capital loss. The result may be a price per unit for a large block trade that looks less favorable to the customer than the going price in a round lot order-driven parallel market.
Wait on those guys to catch up on watching the last few VHS tapes of you know what and they should remove the unsolicited quotes warning. NICE!
Yea. They took the buy order for the first time since the restriction started. The test sell orders were to see if the market makers showed the true size of the customer orders. I had both buy and sell orders in place today briefly to see the changes on level 2. Looks to me like the market makers are soliciting quotes on their own. Just a guess...... But the trading restriction on buying with Schwab is definitely lifted as of today and maybe a little ways back as you suggested.
But restrictions by brokers are all about buy orders not sell orders........did you try and put a buy order with schwab
That was a 400,000 sale order at .0014 that just showed as only 10,000 on level 2. Order was cancelled a few seconds later. I placed it and watched what them solicit a quote themselves. My order was larger and they chose not to show it. Hmmmmmmm
Hey old pal. Wonder if unsolicited quotes have to show the true size? One would think so?
Yea. I am starting to think that was the issue with the trading restriction. Wish I would have tested a buy order on Schwab the day after they dropped shell risk and also day after they went OTC Current. It's hard to know every detail from reading junk on the internet. People at the brokerages should know this stuff. Someone should ask a broker they know. Every stock broker that I have used has my phone number permanently blocked and a restraining order in place on me.
Placed a 100,000 sell order at .0014 and GTSM showed it as 10,000 size. I removed that order a few seconds later. I was pissed because they didn't show my 1,000,000 share sell order at 1.00. But in MY opinion they are soliciting quotes because MM GTSM did not show the true size of my .0014 sell order. So, they are playing market maker based on my test. I am not 100% sure.
I thought the buy restriction was because of the when it was ( Shell Risk ) not the Unsolicited Quotes
I will place a test sell order for 10,000 shares at 1.00 PPS next. Please, no one buy them that dang cheap. Let's see how it shows on level 2. I will cancel that sell order because I don't really want to sell them right now.
Maybe. Schwab had a buy restriction before. Now, they do not. Also, more market makers are on MCIC now which could mean they are soliciting quotes. Keep in mind that unsolicited quotes means the market makers can ONLY show customer orders and can't trade it themselves. Seems like a broker could answer this question if we called them. They should have a way to know if they can solicit quotes. Especially a smaller brokerage that understands the equity feeds and crap.
So your saying that .......Warning! This security is eligible for Unsolicited Quotes Only will be taken down soon
Look at the pushers trying to build up a stock that still sits at a pathetic .0015 with 7.5 cents of trades this week. When the pushers try this hard, their stupi - I mean cluelessness shows.
MCIC - To Uranus
Now we wait for otc to catch up !!!!!
Good thing you didn’t bet me or you would be having to talk to dk . lol
Mcic to Pluto and beyond
Looking good mcic
Meaningless. The quotes warning sign is still up, and the volume is still terrible (7.5 cents in shares traded so far this week).
Personal attacks, repetitive, off topic posts or outright flame baiting posts are not accepted.
Posts that respond to PM (One way messages) are not allowed. Vulgarity is not acceptable. Violation of ones privacy is not acceptable.
Posts in violation of the rules will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be reported to the admins of IHUB.
Rules of the board per IHUB:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/complex_terms.asp
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |