Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
5-15-24 10Q shows revenue and net improvement. MTBLY acheives positive EBITDA of 250,000 in first quarter.
Net goes from negative 3.4 million to negative 1.1 million. Costs down / revenue up-- they are on the right track. should move the stock back over $1.00 soon.
MTBL changed to MTBLY. Delisted from the NYSE to the OTC:
https://otce.finra.org/otce/dailyList?viewType=Additions
So MTBL has reduced share count now from approximately 1,141 million shares down to about 837 million shares, and then just retired another 117 million they bought back from SofBank.
So now they have only about 700 million shares, as opposed to over 1,141 million a year ago. That's a very agressive re-purchase program.
Looks like RENN will become fully reporting, and will comply with all SEC requirements. Now the only question is what is going on with the China used car business, and are the two U.S. apps making any money??
I'm betting there is more value here than is now recognized, and that it should be a $3.00 stock, not a $1.70 stock.
Already made money on the distribution, but I think everyone got out that was in for that, making it oversold,
Sweet. Thanks for the info.
Not really “wow” eligible.
Shareholders received $31.617 per share today.
$RENN: Howwwwwwwwwww wrong you were AMIGO !!!!!!
Now at $33.50
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=158087692
The next one that is gonna be like $RENN is $TMNA
GO $TMNA
$RENN: Howwwwwwwwwww wrong you were AMIGO !!!!!!
Now at $33.50
The next one that is gonna be like $RENN is $TMNA
GO $TMNA
Renren Provides Update on Special Cash Distribution For Settlement Regarding Shareholder Derivative Litigation (12/05/22)
PHOENIX, Dec. 5, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Renren Inc. (NYSE: RENN) ("Renren" or the "Company"), an operator of several US-based SaaS businesses, today announced an increase in the per share amount to be paid in the special cash distribution, that was announced on November 3, 2022, relating to the settlement contemplated by the Stipulation of Settlement, dated as of October 7, 2021 and as amended on May 27, 2022.
The amount of the special cash distribution was previously announced to be US$0.7013 per Renren Class A ordinary share, or US$31.5585 per Renren American Depositary Share ("ADS"). Each one (1) ADS currently represents 45 Renren Class A ordinary shares. The special distribution amount, in each case, is prior to the deduction of applicable taxes, fees, and expenses. As a result of interest earned on the settlement account, more funds will be available for distribution from the settlement account on a pro-rata basis, and the amount of the special cash distribution will now be US$0.7026 per Renren Class A ordinary share, or US$31.6170 per Renren ADS; in each case, prior to deduction of applicable taxes, fees and expenses.
Additionally, Epiq Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc., as administrator for the settlement funds, will now be responsible for paying the special distribution to record date holders of Renren ordinary shares and transferring settlement funds to the Depositary Trust Clearinghouse & Company for subsequent disbursement to ADS owners. Accordingly, Citibank, N.A., depositary for Renren's ADS program, will no longer charge a special cash distribution fee of US$0.05 per ADS held pursuant to the Renren ADS Deposit Agreement (as amended).
The special cash distribution is still expected to be paid on December 21, 2022. Due bill period will run from November 18, 2022 to December 21, 2022. Due bills track trades of stock in the interim period and ensure the right stockholder receives the special distribution. In order to receive the special cash distribution, you must continue to hold your Renren ADSs at least through the market close on the special cash distribution payment date (i.e. December 21, 2022).
According to the NYSE, the Ex-Dividend date for NYSE trading will be December 22, 2022. The Ex-Dividend date is the date on which the NYSE will reset the opening trading price of Renren's ADSs to reflect the payment of the special cash distribution. If you buy Renren ADSs on or after the Ex-Dividend date, you will not receive the special cash distribution.
Renren expects that trading for its ADSs will be extremely volatile given the per ADS value of the special cash distribution compared to the current trading price of Renren's ADS. In particular, volatility is expected to be high on and around December 21, 2022, the last date on which purchasers of ADSs on the NYSE will obtain the right to receive the special cash distribution with respect to the purchased ADSs, and on and around December 22, 2022, the Ex-Dividend date.
The trading price for Renren's ADSs on the ex-dividend date is expected to be much lower than the closing price on the last trading date before the ex-dividend date, to reflect the amount of the special cash distribution. To the extent that Renren's ADSs trade below US$1.00 per ADS for an extended period of time, or at a price viewed to be an abnormally low selling price under NYSE rules, Renren's ADSs may be suspended from trading on the NYSE and ultimately delisted.
About Renren Inc.
Renren Inc. (NYSE: RENN) operates several US-based SaaS businesses including Chime, a CRM and Marketing Automation platform, and Trucker Path, a trip-planning and business app for long-haul truckers. Renren's ADSs, each currently representing 45 Class A ordinary shares of the Company, are traded on the NYSE under the symbol "RENN".
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/renren-provides-update-on-special-cash-distribution-for-settlement-regarding-shareholder-derivative-litigation-301694913.html
Now we know that owners of RENN on Nov 21 will get a payment of $31.50/share on Dec 21, 2022.
So the question now becomes, what is RenRen (RENN) worth, on it's own, as an operating company?
It has a couple of businesses, which appear to generate some revenue and maybe some profits. Chime, a CRM for real estate professionals, and Trucker Path, the number one site for truckers to interact and do trip planning. They also have some investments in China, including in Kaixib, the used car dealer.
Is the ongoing business worth more than $1?
If so, the stock is still underpriced.
My gut tells me the ongoing company is worth about $2-3.
Renren Declares Special Cash Distribution for Settlement Regarding Shareholder Derivative Litigation (11/03/22)
PHOENIX, Nov. 3, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Renren Inc. (NYSE: RENN) ("Renren" or the "Company"), an operator of several US-based SaaS businesses, today announced that its board of directors declared a special cash distribution in connection with the settlement contemplated by the Stipulation of Settlement, dated as of October 7, 2021 and as amended on May 27, 2022 (the "Stipulation"). As previously announced, the New York State Supreme Court, Commercial Division entered the Final Order and Judgment on June 9, 2022 (the "June 9 Final Order"), which, among other things, approves the Stipulation and the transactions contemplated thereby. The June 9 Final Order became final as of October 20, 2022 following a withdrawal of appeal by certain parties.
The special cash distribution will be paid from a settlement account funded by the Defendants (as defined in the Stipulation) in its entirety without any contribution from Renren and thus will not impact Renren's financial position, liquidity or profitability. Renren will continue to operate its several SaaS businesses before and after the special cash distribution, and it intends to remain a public company listed on The New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"). A total of US$300 million has been contributed into the settlement account by the Defendants. After reductions for certain settlement expenses, including attorneys' fees and expenses awarded by the court to the plaintiffs' counsel, approximately US$247.1 million will be available for distribution from the settlement account.
The special cash distribution is payable to all holders of Renren's Class A ordinary shares (including those in the form of Renren American Depositary Shares ("ADSs"), each one (1) ADS currently representing 45 Renren Class A ordinary shares) of record as of 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on November 21, 2022 (the "Record Date"), other than the Defendants and D&O Releasees (each as specifically identified in the Stipulation). The amount of the special cash distribution is US$0.7013 per Class A ordinary share, or US$31.5585 per ADS, in each case, prior to deduction of applicable taxes, fees and expenses. Pursuant to the Renren ADS Deposit Agreement (as amended), the Depositary will charge a special cash distribution fee of US$0.05 per ADS held, which will be borne by the holders of ADSs.
The special cash distribution is expected to be paid on December 21, 2022. Due bill period is expected to run from November 18, 2022 to December 21, 2022. Due bills function to track trades of stock in the interim period and ensure the right stock holder receives the special distribution. In order to receive the special cash distribution, you must continue to hold your Renren ADSs at least through the market close on the special cash distribution payment date, which is expected to be December 21, 2022.
According to the NYSE, the Ex-Dividend date for NYSE trading will be December 22, 2022. The Ex-Dividend date is the date on which the NYSE will reset the opening trading price of Renren's ADSs to reflect the payment of the special cash distribution. If you buy Renren ADSs on or after the Ex-Dividend date, you will not receive the special cash distribution.
Renren expects that trading for its ADSs will be extremely volatile given the per ADS value of the special cash distribution compared to the current trading price of Renren's ADS. In particular, volatility is expected to be high on and around December 21, 2022, the last date on which purchasers of ADSs on the NYSE will obtain the right to receive the special cash distribution with respect to the purchased ADSs, and on and around December 22, 2022, the Ex-Dividend date.
The trading price for Renren's ADSs on the ex-dividend date is expected to be much lower than the closing price on the last trading date before the ex-dividend date, to reflect the amount of the special cash distribution. To the extent that Renren's ADSs trade below US$1.00 per ADS for an extended period of time, or at a price viewed to be an abnormally low selling price under NYSE rules, Renren's ADSs may be suspended from trading on the NYSE and ultimately delisted.
About Renren Inc.
Renren Inc. (NYSE: RENN) operates several US-based SaaS businesses including Chime, a CRM and Marketing Automation platform, and Trucker Path, a trip-planning and business app for long-haul truckers. Renren's ADSs, each currently representing 45 Class A ordinary shares of the Company, are traded on the NYSE under the symbol "RENN".
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/renren-declares-special-cash-distribution-for-settlement-regarding-shareholder-derivative-litigation-301667037.html
Settlement is now final after the appeal was withdrawn, according to today's news release.
The amount of the automatic per/share payout should be coming soon.
Likely to be over $31.00-- so why would anyone sell today?
Even if payout is only $31, you still are left with shares in the company, with must be worth something-- if only $2-3 -- the stock is still worth about $33 or $34 at this point.
Renren Announces Effectiveness of Settlement Regarding Shareholder Derivative Litigation (10/26/22)
Renren Inc. (NYSE: RENN) ("Renren" or the "Company"), a SaaS company, today announced that the Final Order and Judgment entered by the New York State Supreme Court, Commercial Division on June 9, 2022 (the "June 9 Final Order"), which was furnished by the Company to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on Form 6-K on June 10, 2022, became effective on October 20, 2022 following a withdrawal of appeal by certain parties. The June 9 Final Order approves, among other things, the Stipulation of Settlement dated October 7, 2021, as amended by an Amendment to Stipulation of Settlement dated May 27, 2022 (in combination the "Stipulation"). The Stipulation settles the consolidated shareholder derivative lawsuits captioned In re Renren, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Index No. 653594/2018 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty.).
Pursuant to the Stipulation, the Net Settlement Amount (as defined in the Stipulation) will be distributed to all holders of Renren's Class A ordinary shares (including those in the form of Renren American Depositary Shares) other than the Defendants and D&O Releasees (each as specifically identified in the Stipulation).
The Company plans to announce the exact amount distributable and the record date in due course.
About Renren Inc.
Renren Inc. (NYSE: RENN) operates several U.S.-based SaaS businesses including Chime, an all-in-one CRM and sales acceleration platform designed to help real estate professionals close more deals faster, and Trucker Path, a suite of applications and dispatch services commercial truck drivers use to plan trips, navigate, and operate their business. Renren's ADSs, each currently representing 45 Class A ordinary shares of the Company, are traded on NYSE under the symbol "RENN".
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/renren-announces-effectiveness-of-settlement-regarding-shareholder-derivative-litigation-301660425.html
15 / 30 / 35 puts are selling for 2 / 5 / 7 respectively. The 15 and 30 puts have open interest, but it's minimal for the former.
....well, I don't think you are missing anything.
I guess the only risk is that the payout doesn't happen before the April expiration, in which case you'd lose the cost of the puts.
What are those puts going for these days?- sounds like an interesting speculation.to me, too.
I'm 100% in agreement with your perspective on RENN. My cost basis is below $30 and I intend to hold in order to capture the payment and selling the stock for whatever residual value the market assigns to it (I'm a shade more pessimistic than you and expect $2-4).
It's the residual value which makes me curious about the short game. Full disclosure: I have no desire to short the stock. Rather, I'd buy a put with the longest expiration date...currently, this is Apr '23. Is this a risky strategy? Most definitely. But am I missing something with regard to the stock price taking a precipitous drop post record date for the payout?
I have never shorted stocks, so I am not likely to start now.
I'm happy to buy this under 30.00, when I am fairly certain of a payout of around $31.00, plus the residual value, which is likely around $3-5/share.
The problem in shorting, of course is the timing.
Hard to tell when the appeals will be wrapped up. Could be 2 months, could be 6-- who knows.
A very risky move prior to payment.
I would need to know the actual payout amount and then see how the market reacts. There may be some price decay over time.
How do you feel about RENN as a potential short? Wouldn't the stock crater once ADS holders receive their payout?
This is an indication that the residual value of the company, after payment of the litigation payout to shareholders, will be higher.
The payout, whenever it comes, will be around $31.00/share.
So the stock now trades for less than that amount. What is the company worth as a going concern after the payout? Who knows. But it is likely more than 0... more likely around $2-5/ share.
That means you are getting 33- 35 of value here, for about $30 today.
Look back on this, and you'll see I have been consistently right on this stock.
Renren Announces Board Changes (10/11/22)
PHOENIX, Oct. 11, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Renren Inc. (NYSE: RENN) ("Renren" or the "Company"), a SaaS company serving multiple global industries, today announced the appointment of two new independent directors to its board of directors (the "Board"), Mr. James M. Dumler and Mr. James D. Reed, effective October 11, 2022. Ms. Hui Huang and Mr. Chuanfu Wang have concurrently resigned from their positions as a director of the Company and as members of the three committees of the Board. Ms. Huang and Mr. Wang resigned for personal reasons, and their resignation is not related to any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company's operations, policies, or practices.
After the changes, the Board will continue to consist of five members, three of whom are independent directors. The audit committee will consist of Mr. Lin Cong and Mr. James D. Reed, with Mr. Reed as the chairman; the compensation committee will consist of Mr. Lin Cong and Mr. James M. Dumler, with Mr. Cong as the chairman; and the corporate governance and nominating committee will consist of Mr. Lin Cong, Mr. James M. Dumler, and Mr. James D. Reed, with Mr. Dumler as the chairman.
Mr. Dumler has more than twenty years of experience in top management and board director roles with various enterprises and industries, including Koch Industries, CenterPoint Energy, Republic Financial (private equity), Purina Mills, and FJ Management. Mr. Dumler holds an MBA from Duke University.
Mr. Reed served as CEO and director of USA Truck Inc (NASDAQ: USAK) from 2016 through September 2022 and brings with him more than two decades of multi-faceted experience in trucking, logistics, finance, and business development. He previously served as chief financial officer of Interstate Distributor Company, as well as president of its subsidiary, Interstate Distributor Logistics. Mr. Reed's extensive experience includes more than 15 years of leading finance in public companies.
"On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to express my gratitude to Ms. Huang and Mr. Wang for their valuable contributions to Renren during their tenure on the Board," said Renren's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Joseph Chen. "We are delighted to have Mr. Dumler and Mr. Reed join our Board as independent directors. Their extensive executive experience, financial management savvy, and industry expertise will bring significant value to Renren and its shareholders."
About Renren Inc.
Renren Inc. (NYSE: RENN) operates several U.S.-based SaaS businesses including Chime, an all-in-one CRM and sales acceleration platform designed to help real estate professionals close more deals faster, and Trucker Path, a suite of applications and dispatch services commercial truck drivers use to plan trips, navigate, and operate their business. Renren's ADSs, each currently representing 45 Class A ordinary shares of the Company, are traded on NYSE under the symbol "RENN".
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/renren-announces-board-changes-301645596.html
This is a definite BUY under $28, as it is a guaranteed 10% return, in likely about 6-9 months.
I don't know anywhere else you can get that kind of return.
Appeal was filed, which will have the affect of delaying by several months the payment of the settlement funds.
As from the very first settlement about a year ago, when it was rejected by Judge Borok, I have been saying that his original decision misunderstood the nature of a shareholders derivative action.
A shareholders derivative action is filed ON BEHALF OF THE CORPORATION, and not on behalf of a group of shareholders at a particular point in time.
The appeal is based on that same mistaken notion of a shareholder's derivative action, and will not prevail.
Had the appellants grought their own action, at or around the time of the corporate "looting" as they call it, they might have grounds to be compensated.
But they did not.
Instead a group filed the shareholder's derivative action, and that means that the law cannot make an award to any entity EXCEPT the corporation itself, with provisions excluding the shareholders who perpetrated the wrongful acts. That's what the settlement does, and I have no doubt it will be upheld on appeal.
It's not a close call. For those who still want to take advantage of this situation, the share price may slip a bit here, and you can make the difference between the share price and the payout amount, which is calculated to be about $31.00 a share, plus the residual value of the company shares, that you will still own after the payout.
It can only be hoped that the Court of Appeals expedites this appeal and its decision, as this is a pretty easy call.
Monday should be the deadline for filing of an appeal, and so we should get some further clarity after Monday, if no appeal is filed.
There is only one uncertainty remaining here, and that is when the distribution to shareholders will be made.
The distribution is dependent on whether any appeal is made to the stipulated and agreed judgment, agreed to by all the parties to the action.
If no appeal is filed within thirty days of the June 9 hearing and entry of final judgment, the court will set a record date, and all shareholders as of that date will receive the distribution.
So the payout could come as soon as July or August of 2022.
If an appeal is filed, the case may drag on for another 8-10 months, depending on how quickly the Court of Appeals takes up the appeal.
So that uncertainty is holding the price down at this point. Anyone interested can monitor the docket, here: https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/FCASSearch
by entering the case number: 653594/2018.
Here's hoping no appeal is filed!!
Another positive article on Seeking Alpha by Chris DeMuth.... he says RENN is STILL undervalued.
I agree.
Should be a payout of about 31.00--- plus residual stock value.
Right on both counts.
It's not good how some judges get to be in their positions. But as Winston Churchill is alleged to have said: "Democracy is the worst type of government- except all the others."
And I also think that he effectively reversed his opinion, when the appeal was filed, and he probably talked to some smart lawyers who told him he would likely be reversed on appeal. To be reversed in a high-profile case like this, would not have been good for his career.
Let's hope this gets finalized soon, so we can get paid.
We should have been paid by now, had Borrock approved the original settlement.
I'm not sure if a final court date has been set. Have you checked the docket recently?
Thanks! This is very interesting, but the fact that it's more important to be rich than than to be knowledgeable if you want to become a judge is not really ideal from the point of view of the rule of law, I think.
And it certainly offers an explanation why the initial position of the judge - which was described in one initiated comment on Seeking Alpha as "completely lawless" - was so completely reversed later. Presumably he consulted someone who actually knew the law in the meantime.
Chrysanthemis:
Thanks for all your DD on this case.
I found an interesting little piece about our Judge Borrok, from 2014, before he became a judge:
https://nypost.com/2014/06/30/real-estate-millionaire-spending-wealth-to-become-judge/
This may explain why his reasoning in that first ruling was off-base, and why he decided to reverse his earlier ruling to avoid be overturned on appeal by a higher court.
Regards,
D
Thanks! Having read through the judgment, I think we can now narow down the potential outcome in time and magnitude.
As far as I understand, the settlement is now approved and the proceeds will be distributed to those eligible shareholders who own Class A shares or ADS as of the Record Date. The Record Date is defined as, basically, as soon as possible after the Effective Date, which in turn is defined as the first date on which approval of the Settlement by the Court has become Final.
Once the specific date of the Record Date is determined, Renren shall file a Form 6-K and publicly announce that date.
It turns out that the judge did not budge from his position stated in April, namely that 17.5% would be the upper limit of lawyer fees acceptable. This translates into a fee for the Plaintiff's counsel of 52.5 MUSD out of the 300 MUSD of the settlement.
Moreover, the judgment accepts to lawyers' fees for the Shareholder Coalition Counsel of 277 kUSD (rounded down to 275 kUSD in the actual order), but rejects a request for 96 kUSD from the CRMC counsel. A total administrative fee of 166 kUSD plus a possible buffer of 25 kUSD is also approved.
And that seems to be it.
Two uncertain factors remain. First, the administrative fee buffer may not be (fully) used, and the judge can later accept to increase it, but I presume the effect of this will not be material.
Of more concerns is a pending request from Renren itself to be compensated for its legal fees; the amount ranges from 2.2 MUSD to 3 MUSD.
It is reasonable to assume that the number of eligible ADS will be close to 7.754.623 (Z), see my earlier posts.
Putting all of this together, we obtain a per-ADS compensation of at most:
(300 MUSD - 52.5 MUSD - 277 kUSD - 166 kUSD) / Z = 31.86 USD.
In a negative scenario, where Renren would be granted the 3 MUSD it seeks and the administrative fee would exceed the buffer and amount to, say, 300 kUSD), the payout becomes 31.46 USD per share.
So it seems there is still some money on the table at the current share price level.
New York Court Approves $300 Million Settlement Benefitting Minority Shareholders in Renren Derivative Litigation Announces Reid Collins (6/09/22)
Settlement of at least $300 million is among largest ever shareholder derivative recoveries
Plaintiffs overcame novel issues of jurisdiction and standing in creating precedent-setting case law to hold foreign companies and actors accountable in U.S. courts
As Lead Counsel, Reid Collins successfully prosecuted groundbreaking claims against Renren insiders
NEW YORK, June 9, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Today the New York State Supreme Court granted approval of a direct pay cash settlement totaling at least $300 million resolving the In re Renren, Inc. Derivative Litigation (NYSE:RENN), one of the largest cash settlements of a derivative action in history. (The aggregate cash payment to Renren's minority shareholders and ADS holders may exceed $300 million depending on the final determination of the number of shares and ADSs held by non-Defendants). The action alleges a complex scheme by Renren insiders to take the company's billion-dollar investment portfolio for themselves.
Litigation powerhouse Reid Collins & Tsai LLP, Lead Counsel for the derivative plaintiffs, originally announced the terms of the settlement in October 2021.
Reid Collins Founding Partner William T. Reid, IV on the resolution of the Renren litigation: "This is an extraordinary result by any measure. It is very rare to settle a case for more than the damages that we originally pleaded. Yet indeed, from the vantage point of minority shareholders, we have recovered more for them in this direct pay settlement than the damage claim we set forth in the complaint. Obtaining jurisdiction over these foreign defendants was no small task, but obtaining derivative standing was an even greater achievement. What little New York law existed on establishing derivative standing under Cayman law was adverse, but the facts of this case and a thorough presentation of Cayman law nonetheless allowed us to establish that the minority were in fact entitled to pursue the company's claim under the 'fraud on the minority' exception to the general rule against derivative standing. I could not be more proud of what we have accomplished in Renren, and of our clients, including Heng Ren Silk Investments, LLC in taking on this significant and important challenge."
The shareholder derivative suit arises from a highly unusual series of interrelated transactions through which Renren's allegedly corrupt insiders took Renren's investment portfolio for themselves in 2018 to the detriment of minority shareholders. The complaint centers on alleged breaches of fiduciary duty in connection with the transfer of Renren's most valuable assets, including a substantial stake in fast-growing lender Social Finance, Inc. ("SoFi") — for far less than fair market value — to a private company, Oak Pacific Investments ("OPI"), which is owned and controlled by Renren's CEO Joseph Chen and other controlling shareholders. Chen and affiliates stood on all sides of these transactions as major investors and/or directors in Renren, OPI, and SoFi itself, facilitated by Duff & Phelps, LLC, a financial advisor to a special committee of Renren's board of directors, who it is alleged aided and abetted these breaches of fiduciary duty
"We are very pleased to have achieved a positive outcome for all minority shareholders," said Alexander Shoghi, portfolio manager at Oasis Management.
"This is an important message American investors are sending to Chinese companies on our stock markets," said Peter Halesworth, founder and manager of Heng Ren. "U.S. shareholders will fight raw deals of bad actors from China in our stock markets."
Precedent-Setting Case Will Have Long-Term Impacts for Cross-Border Fraud and Financial Misconduct
In May 2020, Reid Collins defeated all motions to dismiss filed by the original defendants. In March 2021, the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department of New York State Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's denial of all the motions to dismiss and rejected defendants' arguments over personal jurisdiction and contending that plaintiffs lack standing under Cayman Islands law. In April 2022, the New York State Supreme Court took the rare step of attaching all of the assets that OPI received in the 2018 transaction and required any sales proceeds up to $560 million be deposited in a New York escrow account.
Plaintiffs faced significant legal challenges to acquire U.S. jurisdiction over multiple foreign defendants and establish derivative standing under Cayman law. After an extensive investigation and litigation, Plaintiffs presented the complex details of the transactions and the conduct of the far-flung participants to the court, building a jurisdictional theory with which the court agreed completely and was affirmed on appeal. These wins have created new precedent to combat a growing problem in the financial sector – the difficulty in addressing fraud and wrongdoing by foreign companies (and related individual actors) publicly traded on U.S. exchanges.
The case is In re Renren, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Index No. 653594/2018 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.). Reid Collins, representing derivative plaintiffs as Lead Counsel in this action (alongside co-counsel Grant & Eisenhoffer P.A., Gardy & Notis, LLP, and Ganfer Shore Leeds & Zauderer LLP), successfully litigated these novel claims against an array of law firms, including: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP; Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP; McDermott, Will & Emery LLP; Morrison & Foerster LLP; Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP; Goodwin Procter LLP; Holland & Knight, LLP; and Winston & Strawn LLP.
About Reid Collins
Reid Collins & Tsai LLP is one of the nation's leading plaintiffs' trial firms, litigating complex business disputes and achieving billions of dollars in settlements and judgments for its clients. Its team is comprised of accomplished trial lawyers who have extensive experience prosecuting financial fraud and corporate malfeasance cases, bankruptcy and insolvency related litigation, professional liability claims, and cross-border disputes. The firm represents fund managers, investor groups, trustees, receivers, liquidators, international banks, companies, governmental entities, and individuals in federal and state courts across the country.
For more information visit www.reidcollins.com
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-york-court-approves-300-million-settlement-benefitting-minority-shareholders-in-renren-derivative-litigation-announces-reid-collins-301565429.html
Renren jumps after judge approves settlement in derivative litigation (6/09/22)
Source: Seeking Alpha
Thanks for doing all the math here, Chrys!
I agree we are getting close to a resolution, and the price action which has been very steady in an unsteady market reflects growing confidence in a payout around $30. Every time the price dips down below $28, it seems to bounce back fairly quickly. I've tried to buy shares around 27.50, and nobody is selling there.
And, of course, after the payout there would still be some value to the RENN current operations. Not sure what that value is, but it is likely that it is at least a dollar or two.
Thanks for flagging this new document. Indeed, we seem to be heading for a settlement approval on June 8th and a distribution of at least 29 USD, but quite likely somewhat more.
The legal counsel's memorandum of May 13th (doc 1022) argues that 22.5% would be a suitable fee instead of the 33% initially sought; it is furthermore stated that this would give rise to a distribution of 29.98 USD per ADS before expenses.
Incidentally, calculating backwards from this distributed amount of 232.5 MUSD after the 22.5% cut gives a number of ADS entitled to take part of the distribution of ((232.5 MUSD / 29.98 USD = ) 7.755.170 ADS, quite close to the number Z of my earlier posts.
Now, in the hearing of April 14th, the judge stated that 17.5% would be the upper limit where too much would be attributed to the legal council as fees. So we will end up somewhere between 17.5% and 22.5%.
It is possibly a coincidence that the round number 20% lies exactly at the mid-point of this interval, but on the other hand, one should never underestimate the attraction of round numbers.
Assuming that the judge would draw the line at 20%, the distribution would increase by almost one dollar compared to the 22.5% scenario; this takes us to almost 31 USD per ADS before fees and more than 30 USD net of fees and expenses.
New settlement agreement, with revised terms signed by Plaintiffs and Defendants/
My guess is that this reflects consideration of issues raised by Judge Borrok. I think he will approve this one, and we should be looking at right around $30/share payout, and then whatever the stock is worth as an ongoing entity is a bonus.
Looks like we are close to resolution.
Thanks for this alert.
The most interesting facts I found among these filings is that the Plaintiff's law firms now argue for a significant lower fee: 22.5% of the total, instead of the 33% that they sought initially.
Furthermore, they provide an interesting quantified assessment of the outcome, should the settlement and this fee be approved:
I see today several filings by various law firms that worked with the lead Plaintiffs law firm, supporting an award of attorney fees.
These filings are consistent with the earlier analysis that the judge is prepared to revisit and review his earlier decision, and I think these filings are intended to help the judge reach a decision on the legal fees issue, which is still unresolved.
Thanks for this great analysis. I had not seen that transcript, but I think you have read it correctly. The judge has apparently looked at the law in some depth, and concluded that his original ruling was likely not going to stand on appeal.
I think you are precisely right that he sent a signal to the Plaintiffs, and the new filing is allowing the judge to correct his earlier ruling.
Thanks for this great analysis. I had not seen that transcript, but I think you have read it correctly. The judge has apparently looked at the law in some depth, and concluded that his original ruling was likely not going to stand on appeal.
I think you are precisely right that he sent a signal to the Plaintiffs, and the new filing is allowing the judge to correct his earlier ruling.
Dear downthehatch,
thanks for drawing my attention to the new developments. I went to have a look on the web site, and the latest filings are intriguing.
The most interesting part is, in my view, the transcript from a hearing on April 14th (incidentally :) the day when the share price took off), from which I quote the following statements from the judge (my emphasis added):
We now see all the filings made on April 29, which essentially are a request by Plaintiff's counsel for the Court to reconsider its earlier ruling rejecting the settlement, or allowing Plaintiff to re-argue the case, and have the judge enter a new ruling. Plaintiffs focus on the fact that a derivative action must benefit current shareholders. The proof of this is the fact that if the case were to continue to trial, and a judgment be rendered for Plaintiffs, the award would be to the corporation- because a derivative action is one filed "on behalf of" the corporation.
The brief also makes clear that the determination of an appropriate fee is separate from the question of whether the settlement should be approved, and is NOT a reason to reject the settlement.
It is a well-written brief and makes good sense. Offers Judge Borrock a chance to undo his earlier ruling, which would likely not have held up on appeal. (Because the law on derivative actions is quite clear: current shareholders benefit from a successful derivative action, not former shareholders.)
Favorable ruling on this filing would be quite positive for the share price, obviously.
Very strange behaviour. For the last four hours, the stock has hammered against the 29 USD level, without ever reaching it. It stood at 28.99 for long periods. I wonder why this is.
In the meantime I've searched the First Department - Appellate Division for any clue, but I find no mention of RENN since 2021. So that seems to be a false trail, unless I've simply missed the info.
Followers
|
42
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
1064
|
Created
|
05/04/11
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |