Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[J Galt]

Why should I expect anything from Halpern in response to legitimate comments other than more drivel. Another post filled with more Pleiadean nonsense. So, Jay & The UnAmericans are now investing in crypto. Who cares. I must have missed it, but I’m sure it’s somewhere in the Halpern self-promotional archives that he invented crypto. Along with SEO, alternative power sources, and proprietary mineral mapping technology. Not to mention num-chuk skills and Liger drawings. Vote for Pedro.

The poster stated, “lol MAXD is gone, with new management that doesn’t plan on doing anything.” MAXD was GONE years ago when the brains of the operation and inventor, Lloyd Trammell, left because he no longer wanted to be associated with an immoral and unethical Greg Halpern. MAXD was GONE when Halpern decided to focus all the company’s time and money on an illogical lawsuit against one of the largest and most powerful companies in the world, Google, instead of R&D on the technology. MAXD was GONE when Halpern took Harvey Vechery’s money, which was targeted for AT&T and the engineers, and then paid only himself, killing a potential deal. MAXD was GONE when the former CEO, John Blaisure, refused to sign illegitimate SEC filings and the was terminated for that reason. MAXD was GONE when Halpern started stealing Harvey Vechery’s money for personal benefit instead of using it for the company. MAXD was GONE when Harvey Vechery finally realized Greg Halpern had been lying to him and decided to cut off his allowance. MAXD was GONE the moment Greg Halpern posted the Hoodwinkers website, trashing Vechery and everyone else associated with MAXD.

“Boo hoo.... R.I.P. Harvey Vechery....” Care to explain the meaning of your closing comments? Once again, on day one, Greg Halpern begs and pleads with Harvey Vechery to reinstate him, give him money, land, hereditary titles, castles, and gold, and he’ll make him richer. Then on the very next day, Halpern targets his family, trashes his name online, makes threats of lawsuits, and wants him to “rest in peace.”

By the way, my posting on the internet started in 2012, so the “blab la bla” has been for 11 years, not forty. How about responding to direct comments instead of misdirecting readers to crypto? If you have evidence of “bad research” point it out and let’s debate. I’ll stand behind my research skills any day of the week over Halpernian deceptions.

[jay14]

Lol let me start it off with a laugh,
for all the old,
yesterday's aliases....

Keep chasing those ghosts of yesterday....lol MAXD is gone, with new management that doesn't plan on doing anything....

Harvey Vechery can't even transfer the name,
since Delaware
is still waiting for that signature....lol

Another laugh at the alias that can't do correct research....
lol lol lol


I've already instructed my followers,

which have already started regaining
their losses from MAXD
with cryptocurrency....lol
Total market cap sitting at $1.045 trillion....
Look another laugh at yesteryear's researcher,
forty years of bla bla bla....

Move on bad researcher,
or
is it playing to a party of themselves more tantalizing....lol

Boo hoo....
R.I.P. Harvey Vechery....

[J Galt]

It doesn’t matter what the market cap value of MAXD was in years past as it was based on Halpern’s deception. It doesn’t matter what the percentage increase in stock value was as the increases were all temporary and based on Halpern’s pump and dump schemes.

Fake deals to pump the stock and make the company look strong. BUY MORE STOCK! Pumping Connie Nash’s 339 technology to fool shareholders into believing Halpern had found the Holy Grail combination of audio and video, which would take over the world and make all shareholders rich. BUY MORE STOCK! Google lawsuits designed to fool shareholders into believing billion-dollar settlements were “just around the corner” and they would all be wealthy beyond their imagination. BUY MORE STOCK! Beluga Whale cars, Mexican land deals. Mexican gold mines. Gold backed currency in Zimbabwe. Proprietary MAXD mineral mapping technology. MAXD Audio Biometric Security. Gold backed currency with the Indian tribes. Plush bunny deals in Japan. All BS. Doesn’t matter to Halpern. BUY MORE STOCK! That's what it's all about for Greg Halpern. The product is irrelevant. All that matters is the temporary increase in the share value. That's not a successful business model.

What product has MAXD ever successfully brought to market? Name one. What revenue deals has MAXD brought in? Name one. And don’t count Tip Solutions and Formula Four as those were nothing more than nepotistic “in-house” deals which were funded with Vechery’s money and made to look like legitimate revenue deals. For Halpern to promote the stock, of course.

There is no product. There has never been any revenue. The company has no way to pay its debts or operate without Harvey Vechery’s money. As a matter of fact, MAXD would have gone out of business years ago if not for Harvey Vechery’s money. And now Halpern is threatening him with legal action so he can get his money by any means possible?

I wonder if Halpern really wants Harvey Vechery to walk away so there is no forensic accounting and SEC/DOJ accountability for Halpern to deal with? Otherwise, why would Halpern attack his only money source? Where;s the logic in that? What’s Halpern’s game? I wonder, is Halpern going to continue to post negative information about Vechery while he’s attempting to rebuild MAXD?

[J Galt]

Here is the real question we should all be asking right now. Why would Harvey Vechery, or any businessman for that matter, want to continue investing money in a company where that investment would financially assist a large shareholder who is trying to destroy his reputation, his family, and his business?

Why would any sane person want to do business with someone with no morals, values, or ethics? Would you trust a man who demands payment one day and instantly goes on the attack when his demands aren’t met? Would you associated with a man who throws a temper tantrum each time he doesn’t get his way, no matter how ludicrous his demands might be, and proceeds to air personal dirty laundry on public websites? How could anyone ever trust a man like that? It’s the same as trusting a blackmailer not to come back for more after his first round of extortion.

Halpern began posting defamatory information aimed at Harvey Vechery, Scott Kapp, John Blaisure, and others over a year ago on his Hoodwinker website and has not stopped since. It’s hard to even keep track of how many defamatory websites Halpern is now operating, including the link in the latest post.

Halpern provoked Vechery into using legal means to remove Halpern from the company with this vile approach. He intentionally took the company to “non-reporting” status and to the Expert Market so he could avoid forensic accounting and the analysis that came along with each SEC filing. And he now wants Vechery to save Halpern’s investment?

Halpern has been consistently threatening Vechery with legal action on the boards and on his websites. That’s what this is all about. Making money through lawsuits since he can’t earn it the old-fashioned way. Proposing outrageous business deals and then clearly stating “if you don’t go along with my proposals, I am going to use my SEO skills to take you down.” Once again, who would do business with someone like that? All Halpern is doing is driving Vechery farther away from him with each new threat disguised as a “business opportunity.”

[J Galt]

Why does Greg Halpern think anyone cares if Harvey Vechery is “squeaky clean?” His only involvement with MAXD in the past was to fund money for Halpern to use at his own discretion. Without oversight by the way.

Are most bankers, hard money lenders, and hedge fund executives “squeaky clean?” Does anyone in the financial sector fall into that category? Does the average borrower ask the lender for credentials before begging for alms? Greg Halpern was anything but “squeaky clean,” yet we’re supposed to focus on what Vechery did separate from MAXD? This is nothing more than Halpern deflecting from his own track record.

Why does this board poster finish so many of his posts with “lol?” Why is everything a joke to this person? Does he take joy in the misfortune of others? If that’s the case, he should be a truly joyful person after so many years of supporting Halpern’s financial follies. Not to mention all the losses experienced by MAXD investors.

Why does this poster now believe Verchery’s past is important when he has been condemning anyone who posts accurate information about Greg Halpern and his fraud judgments from his Z-Trim days? Or any of Halpern’s past misdeeds with MAXD. It’s “ancient history,” which should be ignored, when it comes to Halpern’s transgressions, but it’s vitally important that Harvey Vechery be squeaky clean before investing more money into MAXD? What nonsense.

Finally, why is this board poster breaking the rules of the Final Order by “acting in concert” and shilling for Greg Halpern? Posting links to Halpern’s latest attack site is doing exactly that.

[jay14]

Harvey Vechery not so squeaky clean....lol
Yesteryears stories speaks volumes,
on where MAXD is headed!!!!
Delaware still waiting for Harvey Vechery signature....

https://bizwackertaxevadorharvey.com

[J Galt]

I would venture to say that most MAXD shareholders did not know anything about what was going on behind the scenes, including his fraudulent filings. I don't hate money by the way.

"Now that the potentially fraudulent contract, for the first time in history, will return money to shareholders from Halpern instead of otherwise, and you believe they should suddenly stand on principle?"

What are you referring to here? What "potentially fraudulent contract" are you talking about?

[grantastic]

No one's ever called ME an "expert" on MAXD and I've been accurately predicting its dilution, lawsuit results, technology trends, and stock price movements for many years on this board.

Seems that the criteria to be called a MAXD "expert" by shareholders, is simply to perpetuate their fantasy that they bought shares in a genuine business.

[grantastic]

MAXD shareholders have been supportive of Halpern's fraudulent filings for years.

Now that the potentially fraudulent contract, for the first time in history, will return money to shareholders from Halpern instead of otherwise, and you believe they should suddenly stand on principle?

No accounting for people who hate money, I suppose.

Personally, I think forgery, for any reason, is not only “wrong,” it’s also illegal, and I don’t know why anyone would want to associate their business investments in an illegal arena.

[J Galt]

I’ve had several shareholders ask me why I didn’t respond to this post and I realized I wrote it but apparently forgot to post it. Getting old.

Yes. My specialty is in research. It’s part of what I’ve done in business for over forty years, which has nothing to do with MAXD or the market by the way. I didn’t post that my “expertise” was in MAXD, I said “I’m considered to be an expert in that area,” meaning research. I have been a researcher in many fields including a research assistant in the legal field. I also did not say who made that consideration, but I would bet most board readers would admit I provide detail not typically found on this forum in my analyses of SEC filings, legal documents, Tenchi San, and Halpernette board posts. I’ve researched MAXD from top to bottom to make up for the fact that I did very little research before our investment dollars were committed as I was “listening” more than I was investigating and/or researching. Which was a mistake I’ve been paying for ever since. My bad.

I was not a “loyal supporter of his plan until he went bankrupt.” That’s factually inaccurate. Go back and look at all my board posts from the beginning and show me where I was a loyal supporter of Halpern. I openly came out against him when I learned the truth about Z-Trim and his past. When I learned what was really going on behind the scenes. When people stopped lying to me. That was years before the bankruptcy. I have posted the truth before, during, and after the bankruptcy. Facts matter. Not conjecture.

Here’s some additional facts that bear repeating, I have never met Harvey Vechery or Scott Kapp. I have never talked to them, emailed, texted, or communicated with them in any way. Constantly assuming I am in direct contact with them is not based on the facts. Stating that I am “spreading news” that Vechery has “changed his spots” is both inaccurate and assumptive on anyone’s part. I did not state anything about “changing spots” in my post. However, Greg Halpern ran the company and made all the decisions. Harvey Vechery was the bank providing money for Halpern, both personally and for MAXD. From what I have learned, Harvey did not design or participate in the marketing plans, develop the promotions, write the PRs, or pump the stock. He bought out the toxic debt and invested in the company. He has not sold his stock; therefore, he did not benefit from Halpern’s manipulations, nor was he part of the “pump and dump” schemes Halpern developed. Like so many other people in this melodrama, he listened to Halpern and believed what he was hearing. A man of his means should have employees in his company who can do the research for him to prevent him from getting involved with a man like Greg Halpern.

Where did I mention “secret patents” and “secret contracts?” The patents were all public and the information is available to anyone who wants to do the research. There is only one patent left active and that is on the MAXD Biometric Audio Security. What contracts are you talking about? There are no current contracts that I’m aware of as the company is not doing any business. Lumping me in with the Halpernettes, who constantly promoted one fake “big deal” after another, is inaccurate as I had nothing to do with promoting the stock.

Not signing and submitting SEC forms at this stage hardly classifies Vechery as a “scammer.” There are legal reasons for what is happening, as well as what is not happening. We will all be able to read the PR or shareholder letter when it is released, and I’m as anxious as everyone else for that to happen. However, since Halpern famously moved the company to “non-reporting” status with the SEC, and then intentionally took MAXD to the Expert Market, before being removed from the company, where is the urgency to file with the SEC? MAXD is already out of compliance with the SEC on filings and there is virtually no trading going on thanks to the EM status. Therefore, anything Harvey Vechery does or doesn’t do publicly is not impacting the share price right now. Furthermore, the SEC has been made aware of Greg Halpern’s actions and has done nothing. I doubt Vechery’s legal team is worried about the SEC right now. For that matter, it’s more than likely going to be difficult to get the company reinstated to the OTC based on all the information the SEC has on file.

Harvey Vechery had the “best interests of the shareholders at heart” when he challenged Halpern in court and had him removed from the company. He is the second largest shareholder in the company and holder of the notes. Which means he also has his own best interests at heart. Greg Halpern has been scamming shareholders for years and it was in the best interest of everyone associated with MAXD that he be removed. Harvey Vechery has lost many millions of dollars in his investment in MAXD and has earned nothing from this relationship. Those are provable facts.

One other point, converting stock does not mean that Vechery liquidated stock. People often equate the two. Other than one minor stock sale of approximately $256, Harvey Vechery has never liquidated stock, as has been implied on this board. He stands to lose more than anyone involved in this fiasco as he has the most invested. That includes Greg Halpern who continues to claim to be the largest shareholder investing millions of “cash” dollars into the company. Right.

[J Galt]

Because it would be a fake contract and could create issues down the road that could potentially negate profits. Personally, I think forgery, for any reason, is not only “wrong,” it’s also illegal, and I don’t know why anyone would want to associate their business investments in an illegal arena.

If you’re referring to the Connie Nash forgery claims, I was told at the time that Halpern had a “wet” signature on file in the safe and that Connie Nash was not telling the truth. Nash denied this claim. Considering all the deception coming out of the principles involved, I have no way of knowing what was, in fact, the truth, and what was complete fiction from this group. I was never in favor the Google suits, but I certainly wouldn’t have been in favor of promoting a forged contract, which is why I asked the question after Nash posted her claims.

[grantastic]

Yes, it's "wrong" for Halpern to forge a contract... but when that forged contract is so great for MAXD shareholders, and so terrible for Halpern... why should shareholders want to stop it?

If shareholders force Halpern to retain ownership of his MAXD debts & preferred shares, then MAXD's debt to Halpern will grow by $100,000s every year, without end.

Presumably shareholders hold out hope that MAXD will one day generate a profit. It's be silly to insist on pledging a huge amount of that profit, in perpetuity to Halpern, when Halpern is offering an escape hatch to extinguish that debt immediately.

[J Galt]

The question, even with the correction, is mangled and hard to follow, but I will attempt to answer what I believe to be an honest question. Other than Halpern, the entire management team was against MAXD becoming a patent troll. I know because I talked to each of them at the time. The attorneys were in favor of filing suits as they stood to make a great deal of money. Halpern was in favor because he believed there would be “billions of dollars” for MAXD and its shareholders and he wanted to take on the “bully” Google. The rest of the management team wanted the focus to remain on the technology. Eliminate the name “Greg Halpern” from the team and you have your answer as to whom I am referring to. As to your question about the filings, you would have to ask someone directly involved in the Vechery team, which I am not.

[Utuse]

Correction "no one else involved" rather than "no one else no".

[Utuse]

Who is the "no one else no" and when to whom you refer?

Where are the filings?

[J Galt]

Sorry for the slow reply. The “boys down under” comment refers to the VLL “gang of four” Connie Nash always writes about. They had nothing to do with the Attia v Google case.

You are correct. MAXD had a business arrangement with Attia. That business arrangement was ended after Greg Halpern went around Attia’s attorney and attempted to settle the Attia case without their knowledge. He also settled the MAXD/VLL v Google case without the knowledge or approval of the VLL group. I won’t speak to the decision to give Halpern limited POA over anything as I was not involved, but it does seem crazy. My understanding is that Halpern was allowed to negotiate but not settle without approval. My comments were unintentionally misleading as I was attempting to make a character assessment of Greg Halpern using the similarities between going behind Attia’s and VLL’s backs to make a deal benefitting himself and not the group or the MAXD shareholders.

As to the sanctions question, I was being a bit facetious in my comments. It was Greg Halpern who talked Attia into the legal approach they used and placed himself in charge of the case, and it cost Attia. No one else involved in MAXD wanted to pursue these lawsuits and turn the company into a patent troll, it was all Halpern’s idea. In my opinion, MAXD the company is not legally liable, but Halpern should be held morally responsible for his overall litigious approach to life.

Greg Halpern has no self-serving right to steal the MAXD technology as it not only violates the court order but is also illegal as all MAXD assets were pledged to Harvey Vechery in the since defaulted notes.

[grantastic]

Halpern's attempted fraud to steal MAXD's patent & "technology" might be worrying... except MAXD's patent is completely worthless, and MAXD's "technology" is fictional.

MAXD shareholders should jump at that the opportunity to get Halpern's debt off the books at the cost of literally nothing.

Halpern also made this statement, “In late 2022, Greg Halpern took ownership of all primary rights of all MAXD technology, in exchange for a fraction of the 7 figures of MAXD still owed Halpern but is unable to pay.” Halpern had claimed in a prior posting that he had taken the MAXD Audio Biometric patent in exchange for money owed. Now he has taken the rights to “all MAXD technology.” He is using the date of “late December 2022” for this larceny. That way he can claim it was done prior to the judgment date of January 11. The problem with this approach is that there was no 8-K issued for a material event. No Notice to Harvey Vechery or the shareholders. Just another acquisition by our resident thief in the night.

[grantastic]

As for the sanctions: The blame quite clearly lands on attorney Nick Kliewer. The sanctions extend to lawyer Ken Kula & Eli Attia ostensibly because they were responsible to supervise Kliewer's actions. These sanctions would probably not have been levied if Attia had wisely withdrawn his lawsuit before the courts made a ruling on sanctions.

I suspect MAXD is not legally responsible for the sanctions because MAXD *WAS* smart enough to withdraw from the lawsuit. Morally, MAXD may have some culpability because they contributed/sanctioned the choice of hiring Ken Kula.

I don't see how Greg Halpern could have personal liability for contributing to the bad choice of hiring Kula- any input he had seems within his actions as MAXD executive.

Yes, Attia should seek damages from MAXD and Greg Halpern for those sanctions.

[grantastic]

Who are "the boys down under"? Are they mentioned in any filings or court documents?

MAXD Corporation had some kind of business arrangement with Eli Attia with respect to Attia's claims against google. This was public knowledge via press releases, SEC filings, and court filings.

It would be moronic for someone to make a contract / give power of attorney to Greg Halpern (the person) in these circumstances, when it's obvious the relevant parties are Eli Attia & MAXD corporation. So it sounds like these suckers got what they deserved.

There's this amazing pattern with MAXD of people signing contracts with people who clearly do not own what they are purporting to sell.

One final point in reference to the Attia case, Greg Halpern had a deal with the boys down under. They gave him limited power of attorney to negotiate in the Google case, and he went around their backs and broke their agreement by settling the “life altering multi-billion dollar” Google case he had been promoting to the shareholders for years for absolutely nothing. Nada. Less than uno dinero. Without the knowledge or approval of his Aussie/New Zealand partners I might add. They were understandably blind sided with this action and very angry. Once again, Halpern doing what’s best for him without the slightest consideration for others. Partners, shareholders, or business associates, makes no difference. Its always been all about Halpern.

[uber darthium]

Greg Halpern through Jay has shown himself to be one of the most psychologically challenged individuals to present himself to the investing public in years. I appreciate the rapid work Jay does to forward this work from Greg Halpern. I think it’s amazing how that knowledge/document pipeline works so efficiently. One could sit back and ask “could Jay be Greg ?” , based on how these posts magically appear.

But that’s ok, per the court order, Greg cannot be Jay and risk contempt discovery from the court…. No couldn’t be, nah…

But we do know from Greg’s writings delivered instantaneously to us from Jay, we just need to be appreciative that such a close relationship is established between 2 separate psychological minds, though the possibility exists these 2 minds are just a small subset of many others, that exists inside of a single human being.

We may never know.

We do know, Greg Halpern is a 40 year serial fraudster,and continues to be so through today.

[J Galt]

I read Halpern’s shareholder template letter and will have comments tomorrow. I just want to make a point that Halpern seems to have overlooked. The share value had been hovering around .0001 for a very long time before Vechery’s court action removed Halpern from the company. The value of the company decreased to .000001 due to the Expert Market fiasco. That means the market cap for MAXD had the company valued around $7,500.00 when Halpern was in charge and is still in the exact same place now. Exactly how has Harvey Vechery damaged the share value since Halpern was removed?

The only time the stock price surged, no matter how low it was at the time, or when there was any trade volume, was due to Halpern’s many fictitious deals and fake promotions, and a great number of people lost money on those fabricated deals. Remind me again, how many revenue deals were there during the Halpern years? How many products were brought to market while Halpern was in charge?

If Halpern's legal game plan is to target Harvey Vechery for the current state of financial affairs for MAXD, he might want to have a sketch artist draw his self-portrait so a BOLO can be issued to the shareholders featuring the real perpetrator. Which would be Greg Halpern.

[J Galt]

The “Groundbreaking News” website, featured in the link, is nothing more than rehashed and renamed MAXD promotions from the past. MAXD Audio Biometric Security is now “MAXD Only In-Class Biometric Audio Security Hack Proof Exascale Morph Logic Voice and Cyber Armor.” That appears to be analogous to a realtor taking a house off the market and listing it a few weeks later as a new property. Or a marketing director lowering the price of a product from one hundred dollars to $99 to promote it as a new deal for less money. It’s just placing a new name on an old product. Lipstick on a pig so to speak.

Once again, the MAXD Audio Biometric Security is the foundation for an undeveloped product, and that’s the exact condition it’s been in since Lloyd Trammell invented and patented it. Greg Halpern does not have the ability to advance the engineering and he has not provided any evidence that he has paid anyone to complete the technology. It’s nothing more than a marketing idea which needs to be handed back to the engineering department for development.

This entire proposal is nothing more than building on Halpern’s plans for a lawsuit against Vechery so he can claim to shareholders he has made an “amazing” business offer to Harvey, and Vechery declined. That way Halpern can claim that he was doing everything in his power to save the shareholders, but Harvey Vechery had ulterior motives. Right. Harvey invested all this money in MAXD over the years for a tax write off. No one will believe that thought process. There are many charities who would benefit from Harvey’s money and would also be a write off. Without all the drama attached. The money was loaned/invested for an expected ROI which was promised by Greg Halpern, not for a tax write-off.

Reading through the latest Halpern proposal/threat document on the provided link, Halpern states, “If a deal is struck, all websites will go positive.” Halpern also states he is going to use his “SEO skills” to manipulate Google to keep all the Harvey Vechery defamatory websites at the top of each page if his proposal is not accepted. There’s a word for that action in legal and criminal circles.

Halpern also made this statement, “In late 2022, Greg Halpern took ownership of all primary rights of all MAXD technology, in exchange for a fraction of the 7 figures of MAXD still owed Halpern but is unable to pay.” Halpern had claimed in a prior posting that he had taken the MAXD Audio Biometric patent in exchange for money owed. Now he has taken the rights to “all MAXD technology.” He is using the date of “late December 2022” for this larceny. That way he can claim it was done prior to the judgment date of January 11. The problem with this approach is that there was no 8-K issued for a material event. No Notice to Harvey Vechery or the shareholders. Just another acquisition by our resident thief in the night.

Greg Halpern is expecting Harvey Vechery to step up and invest more money in the company and save Halpern’s shares and make them worth something. Just like Vechery did in the bankruptcy case, paying off everything for Halpern. The house, the cars, the credit cards, etc.

“Click here to find the amazing offer Halpern gave Vechery to allow Vechery to fix Vechery’s giant mess Vechery created.” Vechery didn’t create the mess, Halpern did. All Vechery did was stop the bleeding by buying the toxic debt and loaning money to Halpern and MAXD every time Halpern asked for help. Harvey Vechery could legitimately be accused of being an enabler, allowing Halpern to continue swindling people using Vechery’s money, but the creator of the “mess” and responsible for fixing Halpern’s mess? That’s not only a stretch of reality, it also would be the ultimate example of Einstein’s definition of insanity if Vechery accepted this “amazing offer.”

Halpern stated, “I wish you and your family the best in everything.” Are you serious? The follow-up comment from Halpern should have been, “Pardon me while I now continue to slander, libel, defame and basically take down your entire family and all your related businesses on my various websites.” I don’t understand why Halpern continues to believe he can treat Harvey Vechery like a dog and then come back the next day and expect Vechery to consider his offer. Words have meaning, as do actions.

[J Galt]

The latest attempt by Greg Halpern to bamboozle Harvey Vechery into pouring more of his money down the plush bunny rabbit hole was included as a link in the board post on 9/11 and again tonight.

Even though the court order specifically prevents him from doing so, Halpern is obviously instructing his Halpernettes to post links to his business proposal for Harvey Vechery so anyone can read it. Not only is preventing “anyone from acting in concert with him” part of the ruling, it’s also a breach of the court order for Halpern to be representing himself as an agent of MAXD by submitting a proposal to Vechery featuring MAXD symbols and discussing assets belonging to MAXD.

According to Halpern in his “groundbreaking news” report on his latest website link, Harvey Vechery has not only “proven beyond any doubt that he is a total fraud,” he is also “a rotten man and a truly bad actor.” Those personal character flaws aside, Halpern wants money from that “bad actor” anyway.

Only a true megalomaniac, narcissist, and pathological dissembler of the truth, such as Halpern, would attempt to justify doing business with a man he claims is “rotten,” but I guess “the end justifies the means” when you have a personal agenda. Or vendetta. Depending on which way the wind blows on any given day. Halpern also wants an executive position with MAXD, even though the court ruling prohibits Vechery from doing so. Past comments about my “reading comprehension” skills aside, Halpern may want to go back and read the Final Order. He can’t hold a position like that with MAXD anymore. It’s in the Final Order.

[J Galt]

One final point in reference to the Attia case, Greg Halpern had a deal with the boys down under. They gave him limited power of attorney to negotiate in the Google case, and he went around their backs and broke their agreement by settling the “life altering multi-billion dollar” Google case he had been promoting to the shareholders for years for absolutely nothing. Nada. Less than uno dinero. Without the knowledge or approval of his Aussie/New Zealand partners I might add. They were understandably blind sided with this action and very angry. Once again, Halpern doing what’s best for him without the slightest consideration for others. Partners, shareholders, or business associates, makes no difference. Its always been all about Halpern. Yes, Attia should seek damages from MAXD and Greg Halpern for those sanctions.

[uber darthium]

Gotta say “Jay”. Halpern is one derelict mentally deranged individual. That letter is textbook.

MAXDSCAM

A MAXIMUM HALPERN SCAM

[grantastic]

Now that sanctions have been affirmed against Attia + Attia's lawyers, do you feel MAXD has any ethical or contractual obligation to pay a share of those sanctions?

Interesting that Attia vs Google is in the Court!

[jay14]

Tomorrows news, today....
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bm6f2nEeQMN3UoK6WLIHPeo9UzctuC8Y/view?usp=drivesdk

[grantastic]

Attia's clownish lawyers can't even submit their paperwork properly without hand-holding from the clerks.

DocketDescription: Returned document for non-conformance.; Notes: Your submitted filing (appellants' reply brief (no. H049586) and cross-respondents' brief (no. H049869)) has been rejected. Missing bookmarks. Please include an electronic bookmark to each heading, subheading, and the first page of any component of the document, and resubmit.

[grantastic]

Looks like there are 3 cases involving Attia at the 6th appellate district:

 
 H049869	20141CV274103		Attia v. Google LLC 
 H049586	20141CV274103		Attia et al. v. Google LLC 
 H048803	2014-1-CV-274103	Attia et al. v. Helix RE, Inc.

H048803 completed last month: the appeals court affirmed the judgment against Attia, affirmed the sanctions against Attia, and awarded costs to Helix.

H049586 and H049869 have oral arguments in a week. Absolutely no reason to expect those will go any better for Attia than the last 3 dozen rulings.

[J Galt]

Case number ***9869 filed 3/14/22 pulled off the Unicourt.com site.

[J Galt]

“On 3/14/22 Attia filed an "Other" lawsuit against Google, Inc. This case was filed in California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District located in Statewide, California.” An Other lawsuit is defined as “Cases involving other matters not classified elsewhere.” Is there anything in all that legalese stating "MAXD" or "Greg Halpern?" No. Because the case no longer has anything to do with MAXD.

Attia hired a new law firm and filed an appeal against Google, and yes, it is “in court” and listed as “pending” with no dates set. However, it should not be “interesting” to any MAXD shareholder as it no longer has anything to do with MAXD. Greg Halpern went around Attia’s old law firm and attempted to settle the case directly with Google without their knowledge. For that reason, Greg Halpern and MAXD were removed from the suit and the possib8ilty of benefiting from any future settlement. Therefore, this appeal case has nothing to do with MAXD or Greg Halpern and should be considered “interesting” in the same way we all learn not to repeat our mistakes through the study of history.

[grantastic]

So what's the case #?

[loophole lawyer]

This case was last updated from California Courts of Appeal on 08/06/2023 at 17:47:20 (UTC).
Attia et al. v. Google, Inc.
Case Summary
On 03/14/2022 Attia filed an Other lawsuit against Google, Inc. This case was filed in California Courts of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District located in Statewide, California. The Judge overseeing this case is Kirwan, Peter. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details Parties Dockets

Case Details
Case Number:
***9869
Filing Date:
03/14/2022
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
Case Type:
Other
Court:
California Courts of Appeal
Courthouse:
Sixth Appellate District
County, State:
Statewide, California
Judge Details
Trial Court Judge
Kirwan, Peter

Party Details
Respondents and Plaintiffs
Eli Attia
Attia PC
Defendant and Appellant
Google, Inc.
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Respondent and Plaintiff Attorneys
Denise Marie DeMory
Myron Moskovitz
Defendant and Appellant Attorneys
Fred Anthony Rowley, Jr
David H. Kramer
Charles Tait Graves
Conor Denali Tucker
Joshua Alec Baskin
Court Documents
Court documents are not available for this case.

Docket Entries
06/05/2023
DocketDescription: Case on conference list.; Notes: June 2023
05/12/2023
DocketDescription: Case fully briefed.
05/12/2023
DocketDescription: Appellant's reply brief.; Notes: Defendant and Appellant: Google, Inc. Attorney: Fred Anthony Rowley, Jr
05/12/2023
DocketBrief: Appellant's reply brief.; Party Attorney: Defendant and Appellant: Google, Inc.Attorney: Fred Anthony Rowley, Jr
04/12/2023
DocketDescription: Respondent's brief.; Notes: Plaintiff and Respondent: Eli Attia Attorney: Denise Marie DeMory Plaintiff and Respondent: Attia PC Attorney: Denise Marie DeMory
[+] Read More
04/12/2023
DocketDescription: Returned document for non-conformance.; Notes: Your submitted filing (appellants' reply brief (no. H049586) and cross-respondents' brief (no. H049869)) has been rejected. Missing bookmarks. Please include an electronic bookmark to each heading, subheading, and the first page of any component of the document, and resubmit.
[+] Read More
04/12/2023
DocketDescription: Association of attorneys filed for:; Notes: Myron Moskovitz for respondents
04/12/2023
DocketBrief: Respondent's brief.; Party Attorney: Plaintiff and Respondent: Eli AttiaAttorney: Denise Marie DeMory Plaintiff and Respondent: Attia PCAttorney: Denise Marie DeMory

[grantastic]

Which court? What case #?

Interesting that Attia vs Google is in the Court!

[loophole lawyer]

Interesting that Attia vs Google is in the Court!

[grantastic]

PRs are meaningless. If Vechery were truly anything but a scammer, he'd submit & sign SEC filings.

Greg Halpern put out zillions of PRs to scam people, and despite your supposed "expertise" you were a loyal supporter of his plans until he went bankrupt.

I'm sure the same people telling you this nonsense about all sorts of secret patents & secret contracts are also the people insisting you're an "expert" on MAXD, oh and btw would you mind going onto internet forums and spreading the news that Vechery's changed his spots, and now has the best interests of shareholders at heart?

[grantastic]

So basically a clone of Greg Halpern

Harvey Vechery is new leadership,

And he has done nothing!!!!

[flyhighTMMI]

Well what is the Harvey Vechery strategy???

[Utuse]

JG,
Have you asked:
Yet, where are the filings, Harv?

[J Galt]

Since the comments from the board poster appear to be directed at me, I will respond accordingly. My post referred to in these comments said nothing about “valuable patents” or “plenty of deals being worked on.” My comment about things going on behind the scenes referred to legal maneuvering over Halpern related issues and had nothing to do with deals, “fantastical tales of tomorrow,” or any form of promotional tactics.

MAXD has only one active patent and it is for the MAXD Biometric Audio Security. This was the base technology Lloyd Trammel invented which was never completed. It is a shell, a foundation for a concept. Therefore, until the technology is developed, the only value is in Halpern’s imagination. As to the technology, I have been repeatedly stating that the current MAXD technology is outdated and would need engineering to be marketable. Once again, the value is only in Halpern’s imagination. I didn’t mention any “deals being worked on.” Therefore, my comments were not related to promoting the company, past, present, or future.

How can it be said “it seems Vechery is using the same tactics” when nothing has been announced? I don’t see any tactics being employed. He is not posting on the boards. I am not posting for him on the boards. I haven’t seen anyone promoting the technology other than Halpern on his websites. The stock is dormant on the Expert Market so why would anyone be promoting at this time? Other than Halpern.

I have always been against the “Halpern tactics” and have admitted to being one of those “naïve investors,” but that was many years ago. The only person I see using “tactics” of any type is Halpern, which appears to be to annoy and harass Harvey Vechery into taking action.

If Harvey Vechery and the new group were to employ the “Halpern tactics” to pump the stock, I would openly come out against that strategy. There must first be a viable product to market before promotion begins.

[J Galt]

The board poster finished his comments with this: “Rest in Peace, HV!!!!” Care to explain the meaning or elaborate on this comment? Is the board poster wishing ill will on Harvey Vechery?

[J Galt]

I don’t make up “BS” to post on the boards. I have never been a Halpernette pumping the stock on this board through lies and deception. For that matter, I’ve never pumped the stock. Not one word of my post is fabricated or deceptive in any way. All the issues I mention have been discussed on the boards in my past postings. I do my own research and I’m considered to be an expert in that area. There are things out there in the public domain if you know where to look and how to access it. Some of that research includes asking questions. Once again, you must know where to go and who to ask. I always check my sources before posting. It’s important to think outside the box.

It’s naïve to believe there are only three options, but to address the posted comments directly:

1) Halpern is not in charge of the corporation. Read the public court documents. He is out for five years. Read Halpern’s latest link posted on the 11th. The man is using every possible means to find his way back into the good graces of Vechery. To get his money.
2) Do you see any signs of the corporation currently being operated? Have public announcements been made? Is the company off the Expert Market? Is there trading going on? I don’t need “inside sources” to read the tea leaves. There is a reason for everything.
3) Meaningful has more than one definition. I’m sure there are many “meaningful” things going on that will be known in due time. We’ll all learn what is going on when a PR is released.

At some point in time, they must put out a PR. You are right about that. As far as “SEC regulations,” where has the SEC been during the Halpern years? How could they have allowed all this to happen? They’ve been notified by both shareholders and Halpern, but nothing has happened. As of yet.

[uber darthium]

I’ll take a dead corpse of Harvey Vechery or anyone else over an hour of the lying conman in the little runtman Greg “GH” Halpern. Greg while kneeling is about 34” tall, one would swear possible dwarf (apologies to comparing the scumbag Halpern to any dwarf)

Conman Halpern has hidden the fact that the audio pump known as MAXD is a SCAM, the audio is ancient obsolete unusable in today’s world.

[jay14]

Harvey Vechery is new leadership,

And he has done nothing!!!!

Zero!!!! Hey Delaware still hasn't been contacted....

Rest in Peace, HV!!!!

[grantastic]

Halpern shills spent years spamming the same story:

"Lots going on behind the scenes"

"Valuable patents and technology we won't talk about"

"Plenty of deals being worked on"

It seems Vechery is trying to keep re-using the same tactics as when he was partnered with Halpern. I don't think this will keep working after 9 years- you've run out of naive investors to lure with fantastical tales of tomorrow, tomorrow.

[Utuse]

Yet, where are the filings, Harv?

[grantastic]

How would an anonymous internet poster end up knowing about these "many legal landmines" before the public or shareholders know about them?

You're either making up b.s., or you're being fed b.s. by someone you think is an insider.

There is no "legal landmine" that prevents the announcement of a change in key personnel at a public company. In fact, such an announcement is likely required by SEC regulations.

There's only 3 realistic possibilities for MAXD control:

1) Halpern is still in charge of the corporation (despite whatever rulings were made)
2) Vechery has taken charge of the corporation, and continues to operate it with opacity & deceit just like when he was collaborating with Halpern
3) Vechery has taken charge of the corporation, but is not actually doing anything meaningful.

It may appear from that one-sided line of sight that “Harvey Vechery has done nothing,” but that’s hardly the case. His legal team has been working on the many landmines Greg Halpern intentionally left behind for Harvey to deal with.

[grantastic]

Sue the guy who just got his bankruptcy discharged? Ok, go for it.

You need to sue him.

[J Galt]

“Boo hoo and all that jazz....lol. Quotes from the basement….” What does that even mean? Is Greg Halpern proud of placing himself (and all of us) in that triple digit basement? Is he proud that it’s currently in the .000001 range? That’s a long climb to get back to the outhouse. That means the 100 M shares you mentioned as “digital wallpaper” is worth approximately one hundred dollars. That's some pretty cheap wallpaper.

It may appear from that one-sided line of sight that “Harvey Vechery has done nothing,” but that’s hardly the case. His legal team has been working on the many landmines Greg Halpern intentionally left behind for Harvey to deal with. Patents left to wither on the vine and are now gone. The only remaining patent listed as being stolen by a digital thief in the night. Trademark renewals that were ignored so they have expired. Unpaid taxes and charter fees. SEC filings that are not only fantastical but were not filed by Halpern before he was removed. By Halpern’s own admission, an auditor who hasn’t been paid, which is probably one reason the filings have not been made. An intentional Expert Market listing that has paralyzed trading and created legal questions about timing and intent. An SEC which has apparently placed MAXD and Greg Halpern under the microscope. Complicating a long and winding road back to financial respectability. Unpaid debts, note holders with their hands out, and judgements. Engineers who haven’t been paid. A dormant technology that hasn’t been upgraded in years. A public stain on the brand. Mounting legal fees for both old and new issues. Especially with continuous Halpern threats behind the scenes about lawsuits and cloned lawsuits.

All the while having to deal with Halpern making threats, attempting extortions, and casting aspersions on his many attack websites. How many of you would make another business deal with a man like Halpern? Consistent threats, name calling, personally defaming Vechery and his family on websites, constantly posting about Vechery “doing nothing” when Halpern knows the traps he left behind take time to legally unravel. Publicly announcing that he has “claimed” MAXD assets that not only don’t belong to him, but the action itself also is in direct violation of a court order. Can’t be done. Furthermore, backdating financial transactions before the Judgment and Final Order is transparent and will not pass legal muster. Not to mention the shareholder “eye test.”

Halpern wants to start a lawsuit against a man with a financial war chest that dwarfs Halpern’s bank account. Halpern has no money. Doing nothing? The Vechery legal team has no incentive to share what they are doing behind the scenes with Greg Halpern as he is no longer part of the team. The court made that clear. Doing nothing? Hardly. Apparently, the only thing Harvey Vechery is “not doing” is what Greg Halpern wants him to do.

[Nagrom10]

You need to sue him.