Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[Coo breeze]

How could you know that

[MD1941]

The guy that destroyed the company is returning to the scene of the crime. The arsonist is demanding that HV fix the company. What kind of insanity is this? Where is the SEC?

[J Galt]

It's true. I’ve been unhappy for many years due to the unethical actions of Greg Halpern in relation to MAXD. However, my posts are not filled with anger and I am not influenced by my emotions when I write. I must also admit I’m amazed with the variety of immature responses and posts featuring an overabundance of Zen Nothingness. I wonder, the last post stated that Halpern “holds the technology.” How is it that Halpern now “owns the technology?”

[jay14]

I understand unhappy and annoyed
however

Harvey Vechery is now in charge....

No contact with Greg Halpern,

who owns the technology....

No contact with the accountant....

No contact with Delaware registration...


NO statement with the direction of the company!!!!

[J Galt]

“Harvey Vechery is now in charge of the company....” This is a factual and true statement. Harvey Vechery is now in charge of the company. Greg Halpern was removed. That means Vechery can do things with the company at his own pace. If he is following the advice of his legal team, then he is doing more than Greg Halpern ever did.

“It's HV's responsibility to fix every aspect of the company....” This is a factual and true statement. As the owner of the company, it will be Harvey Vechery’s responsibility to fix all the mistakes and missteps made by Greg Halpern over his 14 years in charge of MAXD, which is no easy task. It is also a time-consuming process. I think most people understand that it takes time to sift through a train wreck before getting it back on the rails.

“Six months, seven weeks and counting....” This is a deceptive and manipulative statement meant to incite shareholders into believing that the Vechery legal team is incompetent, which is why nothing is being done. For that reason, they should direct their anger and Vechery, instead of the cause of this mess, Greg Halpern. I get it. Halpern did nothing in 14 years, but Vechery must produce within weeks.

To be clear, the judgment was granted to Vechery on January 11, 2023. A few days more than five months ago. Halpern never showed up in court to defend himself. Halpern never made any attempt to contract the Vechery legal team during that time, about the lucrative plush bunny business or any other arrangements. The relief order was granted to Vechery on April 28, 2023. That was a little more than six weeks ago. Halpern never showed up in court to defend himself. He made no attempt to contact the Vechery legal team in that time frame either. The Final Order was posted online at the end of the day on Thursday May 18th. That was a few days more than three weeks ago. That is the actual timeline. Nothing could be done legally until the final order was posted and defined. 26 days ago.

“No contact with Greg Halpern, who holds the technology...." I’m sure the legal team will contact Greg Halpern when they are ready to do so. As I am not part of the team, and I’m not on their email list, I have no idea when that time frame might be. As to “holding the technology,” I assume they are fine with Halpern holding all MAXD property until they are ready to claim it. Then he must stop holding it and turn it over. That is the only way I can answer this question as I have no contact with the legal team.

“No contact with the accountant.... No contact with Delaware registration....” This daily mantra from the Halpern team is transparent. I’m assuming the Vechery legal team will get in touch with both the accountant and State of Delaware at the right time. As someone who has no contact with anyone on the Vechery team, I can’t answer these questions. I would venture to say no one posting on this board can. Once again, I’m sure they will get to them when they are ready. The Halpern agenda here is to make the Vechery team look incapable of taking care of the business. One reason they may be taking this long is due to the legal and administrative mess Halpern left behind.

“Legally, nothing is stopping Harvey Vechery from releasing a statement on the direction of the company.... NOTHING!!!!” This is true. Vechery could release a statement anytime. Apparently, they have chosen not to for their own reasons. I can only speculate as to why, but I assume it also has to do with the same legal and administrative issues left behind by Halpern. I can also speculate they are wanting to do things the right way, which generally takes longer.

“Harvey Vechery's minions continue to stray away from these questions with complete untrue nonsense....” I think Greg & the Halpernettes should be able to see that I have no problem addressing each and every question asked to the best of my ability. I don’t have many answers, but I’m not afraid to address each question. They might want to do the same in the future. Start with the 8-K and then move on to the posts of the last week. By the way, why not point out what is “untrue nonsense” in my post. Do me the same courtesy of backing up the insults with facts.

[jay14]

Harvey Vechery is now in charge of the company....

It's HV's responsibility to fix every aspect of the company....

Six months, seven weeks and counting....

No contact with
Greg Halpern,
who holds the technology....

No contact with the accountant....

No contact with Delaware registration....

Harvey Vechery's minions continue to stray away from these questions with complete untrue nonsense....

Legally, nothing is stopping
Harvey Vechery from releasing a statement on the direction of the company....
NOTHING!!!!

[J Galt]

“Harvey Vechery is new leadership, just Another poop sandwich of distortion, with hearsays....” I post a detailed breakdown of an actual MAXD meeting that happened four years ago, and in return I’m greeted with a less than challenging response. I’m always impressed when anyone demonstrates the vast rhetorical skills required to express scholarly opinions in an online post. Once again, please point out the excremental level distortions referred to in the post. I don’t need to read all the “hearsay” comments I apparently made because most of what is posted on these chat boards, by definition, is hearsay. I look forward to additional sophisticated input.

[jay14]

Harvey Vechery is new leadership, just

another poop sandwich of distortion,
with hearsays....

[J Galt]

“Greg Halpern, John Blaisure, and Harvey Vechery knew they'd face sanctions if they spread these lies directly. So they get anonymous cutouts to post these lies on message boards on their behalf.” Anyone using the chat boards that way should face sanctions but, unfortunately, it seldom happens. It certainly didn’t happen with Greg Halpern.

However, isn’t that the description of what Halpern has been accused of doing for the entirety of MAXD? “Anonymous cutouts” have been posting false promotions online, supposedly at Halpern’s request, to impact the share value. Halpern apparently had his ex-girlfriend managing an entire group of these “anonymous cutouts” and would give daily marching orders for posting. I guess Halpern wasn’t concerned with any sanctions when it was his operation.

As to how that comment pertains to me, or to my post, it doesn’t. I didn’t work for Halpern back then and I don’t work for Vechery now. I didn’t pump then and I’m not going to start now. I may be anonymous, but I’m nobody’s cutout, marionette, or megaphone.

[MD1941]

I'm still in shock that we are actually be taunted and threatened by someone that should be behind bars! I do believe that the SEC will eventually be forced to deal with our ex-CEO.

[MD1941]

Who destroyed the company? The guy that destroyed the company is taunting people to fix it. I think it's actually called sabotage. Team Halpern actually admitted that the stock was put on the Expert Market on purpose.

[Kracker Jones]

Nothing said by maxd or the cronies was ever true. So HV has nothing to fix all we can hope for is he puts something in the empty shell. But he'll probably do a RS first

[Kracker Jones]

There's a trade for half a penny today

[jay14]

Hmmm interesting....

Greg Halpern, John Blaisure, and
Harvey Vechery
knew they'd face sanctions
if they spread these lies directly.
So they get anonymous cutouts to post these lies on message boards on their behalf.

New leadership
Harvey Vechery has an obligation to fix every aspect of the company....

[J Galt]

“It's not opinion, it's fact. MAXD has never demonstrated any working "technology", ever.” No, in this specific case, it’s still an opinion. It’s one thing to state that technology already in the public was not “working,” as anyone could test MAXD and make that claim, it’s quite another to state that specific technology, which was never introduced to the public, and therefore could not have been tested by the board poster, was not “working.” The board poster has no way of knowing that for a FACT, therefore it is only an educated guess or opinion. Nothing more. Be honest about it.

“Trying to start a rumor,” “Shadowy unnamed executives,” and “Spring forth bucketloads of money,” are all provocative statements that have nothing to do with what I stated in my post. As detailed, I was attempting to counter the deflective Halpern statements that “John Blaisure was in charge until 2019” and should be blamed for all the MAXD failures, not Halpern. This meeting was one example of Greg Halpern overriding John Blaisure, not to mention Harvey Vechery, by not paying the engineers, with money loaned to MAXD for that specific purpose, which would have allowed them to complete their work on the project. Not paying the Qualcomm outside engineering firm for the work they performed on the voice technology, along with not paying the MAXD engineers, effectively ended the project. The voice technology was never completed so there was no deal to announce, and therefore, no technology for the public to test.

As I stated on the other board, I never said anything about Qualcomm or AT&T committing resources or for that matter, "meeting in a hotel room." Those are your words. It was in a corporate meeting room at the CES show in the Las Vegas Convention Center if that even matters. Qualcomm's outside engineers had already been working with MAXD to help develop the voice technology. AT&T committed during that meeting to provide their engineers to work with MAXD to adapt the voice technology to their phone. The only "resources" needed to complete the engineering would be from MAXD to make it work. That was the reason to get $250k from Harvey. He was the one who committed the resources to MAXD, not the other two. Those resources, the $250k, was committed by Vechery to MAXD after the meeting was over. In other words, Vechery's decision to fund the money was due to the reaction of the AT&T VP to the new technology. That is both provable and traceable. There was no reference to “bucketloads of money” being thrown at MAXD as that was never the case. Would MAXD have benefitted if the technology was approved by AT&T and a contract publicly announced? Of course. That is what I said and has nothing to do with “boatloads of money.”

The meeting was over four years ago and is dead in the water for the reasons mentioned. I’m sure the MAXD name would be laughed at if AT&T was approached right now, or anytime in the near future. That is not “trying to start a rumor” and for what purpose would that be done? The stock is on the Expert Market and will not be traded for some time. How would a “rumor” about a meeting four years ago result in a pump right now? This meeting has never been mentioned publicly before and was not used back then by anyone to pump the stock as there was no deal completed.

Naming “shadowy unnamed executives” would be inappropriate without first gaining their authorization, which I’m not inclined to do. To be perfectly clear, I don’t care whether you believe me or not. I have never asked anyone on these boards to “trust me” as I’m not asking anyone to invest. I’m simply posting facts and truths to counter the lies that have been posted for so many years by the “anonymous cutouts” mentioned in the post, as was the case with those working for Greg Halpern.

I’ve said this many times in the past on these boards, show me where I have “pumped the stock.” Show me one time where I’ve suggested anyone buy or sell the stock. It can’t be done as I’ve never said that and I’m not doing it now. Review my posts on Yahoo and IHUB and it will show I am not a pumper of any sort. I have openly stated my opposition to this form of online “marketing” of a stock as I think it’s unethical. The board poster refers to me as a “anonymous cutout” posting lies, which is not only offensive, but also a false statement. Show me the lies. Point them out. Am I “anonymous?” Yes. That is one of the pros and cons of posting online that we all must live with. Am I now, or ever have been, an employee, partner, subcontractor, or paid “minion” of MAXD or Harvey Vechery? No. I've stated repeatedly that I've never met the man or communicated with him in any way. Have I ever promoted or pumped this company or any other online? No.

No matter how many times it’s stated otherwise, the meeting happened as described in a corporate meeting room in Las Vegas at the CES show in January of 2019. Blaisure, Halpern, and Vechery were in attendance from MAXD. The president of Qualcomm set up the meeting. One of the VPs from AT&T was there. They were already at the CES show so they were not really going out of their way. The AT&T VP was taking the meeting at the request of the Qualcomm president. The purpose of the meeting was to demo the new MAXD Voice technology that Blaisure had been working with the MAXD engineers for over eight months. Blaisure had also been working with the outside engineering firm Qualcomm had referred to MAXD to help develop the specific technology. Having the voice technology in the AT&T device would have been a benefit to Qualcomm as well as to MAXD. The demo was first performed on the MAXD phone and then on the VP's cell phone. He liked what he heard and wanted to take the next step. No term sheets were written as it was the first meeting. As Halpern didn’t pay the engineers, it was also the last meeting.

“Yes, it's a fact that sounds very familiar....” For whatever it’s worth, this comment from Halpern yesterday certainly appears to be an admission from him that he remembers the meeting and he was there. Facts are facts. He can’t deny he wasn’t there as there were too many witnesses. The bottom line is that the conveying of this meeting was not designed to pump the stock or make MAXD look better, it was specifically to show how Halpern made the decisions and not John Blaisure.

[MD1941]

I agree that the evidence is there. The evidence is against Halpern not HV. There's enough evidence to put Halpern away for years. Nash pulled the same garbage for years. How did it go for Nash?

[grantastic]

It's not opinion, it's fact. MAXD has never demonstrated any working "technology", ever.

Trying to start a rumour that shadowy unnamed executives from REAL companies were ever about to spring forth with bucketloads of money is standard MAXD scam modus operandi. i.e.: Google, Qualcomm, Netflix, Rakuten, etc. etc. and now AT&T.

All these rumours come from anonymous people who strangely we're supposed to trust even though they refuse to reveal their identities or connection to MAXD or explain how they could possibly to know these meetings and deals are 100% accurate despite claiming to NOT be insiders trying to profit off of classic pump & dump tactics.

Greg Halpern, John Blaisure, and Harvey Vechery knew they'd face sanctions if they spread these lies directly. So they get anonymous cutouts to post these lies on message boards on their behalf.

If you or anyone thinks Qualcomm & AT&T were going to throw buckets of money at MAXD, then PROVE IT. Produce the term sheets, produce the emails, produce the signed statements, produce ANY shred of evidence.

“This story about the president of Qualcomm and a vice president of AT&T meeting Blaisure in a hotel room in Vegas, and either of them seeing working technology and thus agreeing to commit resources is preposterous.” That is the opinion of a board poster with a long history of antagonism toward anyone and everyone connected with MAXD, which is his prerogative.

[grantastic]

Greg Halpern "couldn't get it done" which is why MAXD was a failure for 15 years.

No idea why shareholders trusted their money to that clown.

Did you ever see Halpern's hilarious videos? Slow-motion tai-chi in a Judogi beside the pool? Rambling complaints about the tinder girlfriend who dumped him? Terrible singing with the Zimbabwan?

Hilarious, and worthless as a company executive. No one could discharge obligations any worse than Greg Halpern.

No longer GH's obligations....

[J Galt]

“$250K IDK, perhaps Lloyd Trammel holds that answer....” This appears to be a very strange insinuation that Lloyd Trammell was somehow involved in the disappearance of the $250k transferred into Greg Halpern’s account by Harvey Vechery? How does that work? The money went directly from Vechery to Halpern. It’s easily traceable. Or is Halpern suggesting that he paid fees to a former engineer years after he left the company? No matter what the implication was, are these charges Halpern really wants to make? This is nothing more than misdirection from Halpern.

[uber darthium]

Trammell designed the schematic diagram. He designed the system. As far as I know he is not a “code” guy, as least as I have heard and his AES bio tends to agree. Not withstanding his abilities, “coders” “ programmers” aren’t usually audio guys. The MAXD patent, certainly did not start out as a design based on 1 & 0s. It starts analogue, and ends up analogue

[jay14]

Yes, it's a fact that sounds very familiar....


a board poster with a long history of antagonism toward anyone and everyone connected with MAXD

Opinion, right????

Spreading hearsays throughout from someone,

that also wasn't there,
or another opinion????

What about that phone call with
Greg Halpern
just months ago????

[J Galt]

“This story about the president of Qualcomm and a vice president of AT&T meeting Blaisure in a hotel room in Vegas, and either of them seeing working technology and thus agreeing to commit resources is preposterous.” That is the opinion of a board poster with a long history of antagonism toward anyone and everyone connected with MAXD, which is his prerogative. I’m sure he would admit that fact. But he was not there in the meeting so he would not know what happened. As soon as I saw the thumbs up to the poster on Yahoo, I knew it would appear over here as a response to a post which is hard for Halpern to reply to honestly. Apparently, my response to the post was intentionally ignored as it would have negated the point. Furthermore, the poster is denigrating the MAXD technology, which I guess is acceptable now that Halpern is on the outside looking in.

It would be convenient to discount the story as it is not flattering to Greg Halpern. Far from it. Better to jump on the bandwagon and claim that the story is fictitious. The meeting was set up by Qualcomm, not Blaisure. AT&T was already there for the CES show, as was Qualcomm. The meeting was in a corporate meeting room and not in a hotel room, as claimed. The VP of AT&T was impressed and wanted to go to the next step. Those are all facts. The next step does not mean committing funds or signing contracts, which I never stated. It means “we like what we hear, it has merit, it looks like it could be real, now prove it with the engineering.” That was enough for Vechery to commit the funding to continue.

Halpern was present for the meeting, so he knows what happened. Let me repeat that fact: Halpern attended the meeting. He saw and heard everything and would not be able to "honestly" dispute any of the facts I described from the meeting. Harvey Vechery was at the meeting, and I assume he would testify to the facts as well. Otherwise, why would he have committed another $250k of his own money after the meeting? For that matter, the $250k from Vechery is easily traceable, and the purpose for the funding was contingent on the results of the meeting. There is no getting around the facts. The meeting happened as described. The interest in the technology was real. The business deal didn’t materialize because Halpern didn’t pay the engineers with the money Harvey Vechery committed for that purpose. Those are the facts.

“No doubt this will continue to be one of the story Vechery repeats to try to trick more suckers into buying his MAXD shares.” This was another quote from the antagonistic board poster on Yahoo. Vechery wasn’t writing this “story,” I was. I have no contact with him. He is not my boss, he is not my stringer, nor is Vechery my editor. No one is pushing shares right now as the company is on the Expert Market and Halpern is no longer involved in fake stock pumping promotions. Should we get back to what happened to the $250k money and stop deflecting? Forensic accounting.

[jay14]

It's now up to Harvey Vechery

to make those decisions....

No longer GH's obligations....

[jay14]

Funny, or factual hearsay with this post as being disputed by another poster,

with this comment....

This story about the president of Qualcomm and a vice president of AT&T meeting Blaisure in a hotel room in Vegas, and either of them seeing working technology and thus agreeing to commit resources is preposterous


That's what I'm thinking with
no statement,
no contact with the accountant
and
no contact with Delaware registration....

This also seems to be a charade, already six months/ 7 days now,

with this statement from the same disputed post....

No doubt this will continue to be one of the story Vechery repeats to try to trick more suckers into buying his MAXD shares

And what about that phone call with
Greg Halpern
just a few months ago????

[J Galt]

“Trammel didn't understand or couldn't write the code, whereas GH had to get other people to help write the code.... I guess that part was missed in that gibberish of a post....” Why is it that every post countering the talking points of the regime is described as being “gibberish?” Why not just respond, point by point as I do, explaining where I am wrong? I do it with each Halpern post. However, it’s much easier to throw out the misdirection word “gibberish” than to actually respond intelligently and debate the points.

Lloyd Trammell wrote the MAXD code. He is the inventor and applied for all the patents. Those are documented facts. I recall seeing the patent applications online back in the day. He is considered to be the father of the MAXD code.

Halpern is now saying Lloyd didn’t know what he was doing, and Halpern had to get other people to help. The inventor of the code didn’t know what he was doing with the code. But Halpern did. Right. Trammell was no longer there because he didn’t want to work for Halpern, like so many other professionals in the business who dislike Halpern.

Those “other people,” Halpern must be referring to are the engineers Blaisure was working with, who never got paid by Halpern to do the job. Blaisure was managing the programmers and tested the code for MAXD Voice. Halpern was not directly involved because he was too busy being a patent troll and focusing on his war with Google. And how was Trammell involved?

Attempting to deflect blame to Lloyd Trammell, when he was no longer with the company, and had nothing to do with the potential AT&T deal, is classic Halpern. Fantastical, defensive, dishonest, and completely delusional.

[J Galt]

“Trammel couldn’t get it done!!!!” Couldn’t get what done? Why did Lloyd Trammell’s name suddenly enter the discussion? His name wasn’t mentioned in the AT&T post. For that matter, how would this board poster know what Trammell could or couldn’t do? Is he now a sound engineer, as well as a beach barrister? Or are these Halpern’s words transmitted by his conduit through another one of those personal emails?

Lloyd Trammel wasn’t with the company during the AT&T demo. He was long gone so he had nothing to do with the Vegas meeting or the code writing at that time, nor was his name mentioned in my post. I guess blaming Blaisure for everything is “so yesterday” so it’s time to find a new target. “He was paid $2 million and was fired for trying to steal the technology....” I’ve never heard the “$2m”number, but my understanding from back then was that Lloyd left the company, on his own free will, after promises about stock were broken by Halpern. Halpern knows what I’m talking about. Also, if Halpern is stating that Lloyd was paid $2 million dollars in his entire time with MAXD, to make it sound like a larger number, then I would ask how much was Halpern paid in all his years with the company? I’ve never heard anything about Trammell being fired and it’s not what I was told back then when he left. Now he is suddenly being accused of attempting to steal the technology. That sounds like more revisionist history. Once again, in Greg Halpern’s world he is always the victim and everyone else is the evildoer.

[grantastic]

Greg Halpern has a real knack for picking losers. Every single person he gives money to "can't get it done"

[jay14]

More disgruntled hearsay.... Trammel couldn't get it done!!!!

$250K IDK, perhaps Lloyd Trammel holds that answer....
He was paid $2 million and was fired for trying to steal the technology....
Trammel didn't understand or couldn't write the code, whereas
GH had to get other people to help write the code....
I guess that part was missed in that gibberish of a post....



Harvey Vechery is in charge now,
but it seems
ex transfer agent ethics
have been tossed out the window too....
Or
still chasing Constance Nash!!!!

Where's the statement from Harvey Vechery
on direction of the company????

FYI
The order does not say Harvey Vechery owns the technology....
The inner workings of the company are sperate from that....

That's also in the filing!!!!

[J Galt]

“Post, and Harvey Vechery's minions reply, with distortion....” Distortion? What kind of unethical and immoral person posts personal family information on a public website? Greg Halpern has a photo of the Vechery house and a link to Google Maps. What is his purpose here? He has also posted about the Vechery divorce separation case from October 2009 with a link. Why? An almost 14-year-old case in a family law court has nothing to do with any business. How is this connected to MAXD? How does Vechery’s personal life concern MAXD shareholders?

Vechery had nothing to do with how the company was run before Halpern was removed and was not responsible for any of the 14 years of Halpern’s failures. He saved the company when he bought out the toxic debt for MAXD, which was a huge help to the company and shareholders, and he loaned money to the company for many years, as well as to Halpern personally. If not for Harvey Vechery, MAXD would more than likely have gone under years ago as he was the only “income” the company had. More to the point, it was the only income Greg Halpern had.

Vechery bailed Halpern out of his personal bankruptcy and kept him out of further trouble by paying off the house debt. His reward for being such a nice guy was to have his personal affairs posted on social media on the Hoodwinkers site. What did Vechery do to deserve this treatment? He finally said no to Greg Halpern’s money demands. In Halpern’s mind, that turned him from a great guy and “angel investor” into the angel of financial death. For Halpern anyway.

Is this all some form of extortion plot? One must wonder. Halpern posts teasers of Vechery’s personal life and then states, “Vechery will be given one documented opportunity to make these things right.” What does that mean? What does “make it right” mean?“ Evidence is there, it's up to Harvey Vechery now or face charges....”" Once again, this sure looks like a veiled threat.

The failure of Greg & the Halpernettes to oppose the facts and truths I’ve posted with any form of counter argument, instead deflecting to their latest agenda, and talking points of the day, should be a clear signal to everyone that they know the information I’ve posted is accurate. I’ve repeatedly asked them to respond to the 8-K Analysis, posted on Yahoo, and not a word. I’ve asked them to respond to individual comments in posts and they have not. I’ve asked them to point out one untruth, and I get Zen Nothingness.

Words are posted with innuendo about the former transfer agent but no links to any SEC charges. Links must be posted if insinuations are made. There are none. Prove me wrong. Comments trashing the former transfer agent are made instead of answering his questions. His real name is posted online by Halpern, which is a breach of the TOS, but it’s posted anyway out of pure spite. The words he is posting are just “disgruntled information,” as per Halpern’s comment. It’s time Greg & the Halpernettes start posting facts and counter arguments instead of crawling into the gutter and posting personal information about those who disagree with them.

[J Galt]

More “factual” information in response to the “let’s blame former CEO Blaisure” comments made by Halpern. The statement made, “John Blaisure was in charge until 2019....Get over it,” is inaccurate. Read the following factual accounting and you will see what I’m referring to.

With a great deal of advance work with the engineering team, Blaisure lined up a meeting with a major telecom provider at the CES show in Las Vegas. The VP of this company was there along with the President of MAXD’s technology partner, Qualcomm. As a matter of fact, Harvey Vechery was also there as an observer and enthusiast of the overall electronics show. The purpose of the meeting was to demo the new MAXD Voice technology and how it could be used to improve the performance of the telecom provider’s own phones. The VP was so impressed with the overall demo, and how MAXD improved the sound clarity on his company phone, that he agreed to get his company engineers engaged with MAXD engineers so “we can move forward ASAP.”

Halpern instructed Blaisure to “go get another $250k from Harvey.” Vechery agreed with Blaisure on the value of the deal to MAXD and transferred the funds to Halpern. Once the money was in the account, on the list to be paid were all the past due fees to the MAXD engineers, which had to be paid before they would engage the telecom company’s engineers. Also, the projected engineering fees to adapt the MAXD technology to the specific telecom provider’s devices needed to be set aside to be paid before they would go to work. All the past due fees for the outside engineering firm, who had been recommended by Qualcomm to help create the MAXD Voice feature, also needed to be paid before the work would commence. In addition, unpaid prior expenses due Blaisure, from his personal credit card, including the CES and Hong Kong shows were agreed to be paid by Halpern.

Halpern never paid anything on the list. Let me repeat that, no one on the list was paid. Where the $250k was spent is still a mystery. Again, another reason for forensic accounting. More important than where the money went, is where it didn’t go.

The engineers didn’t get paid. The technology partner’s outside engineering firm didn’t get paid, and what an embarrassment that was for Blaisure to have to deal with in conversations with Qualcomm. Everyone was angry at Halpern. The deal fell apart because, after John Blaisure had been working for almost eight months with the engineers to prepare the voice technology, and then sold the telecom provider on the MAXD voice technology. MAXD could not perform on the agreement because the engineering work could not be completed. Once again, the work could not be completed because the engineers were not paid.

I’m not sure how MAXD shareholders are supposed to “get over it” when we learn that a major deal with a top player in the technology sector was derailed by Halpern not paying the bills. By the way, the name of the “telecom provider” was AT&T, and the deal would have not only been the first major move for MAXD, but it would also have turned the company around. Of course, I’m sure the financial returns would not have been anywhere near the “plush bunny” level, but it would have been a major step for MAXD in the technology sector. Which is what this company was supposed to be about at its origin. A technology company. That was before Halpern morphed MAXD into a patent troll with the Google lawsuit.

The bottom line is that this is another example of how Blaisure was never “in charge” at MAXD. If he was in charge, the AT&T deal would have taken priority over all else, the engineers would have been paid, and the resulting impact on the share value would have been the financial talk of the town. As was always the case, Halpern was coming over the top and acting as the deal “cooler” for MAXD. Cooling all potential deals by simply being himself. John Blaisure was never in charge and Halpern knows it. Halpern should probably take his own advice and “get over it!”

[jay14]

Right, let's battle words on a message board
and not in court....
Typical nonsense....

Where is the evidence? Post it here online.

Evidence is there!!!!

Charges for what? From whom?

(Charge's)That still needs to be determined
on what Harvey Vechery
decides with his move with the company....
Times ticking away....

Lawsuits from legitimate MAXD shareholders
and
most likely Greg Halpern!!!!

What about the mentioning of Harvey Vechery,
that indicated he was investing in the company and engineering....

Where's that proof,
or statement

Or was that hearsay????


Again
No contact with Greg Halpern,
who holds the property....

No contact with the accountant,
who can show the numbers and deals....

And most importantly,
no contact with Delaware registration,
which is needed to actually move the company forward....

Lastly what about the phone call with
Greg Halpern
that took place a few months back????
That email I recieved mentioned you had a conversation with Greg Halpern but no mention of that....
Truthfulness, right????

[J Galt]

“Evidence is there, it's up to Harvey Vechery now or face charges....” Where is the evidence? Post it here online. I have consistently posted comments without receiving any response other than deflecting blame to others. Why not respond to the evidence I presented in the 8-K Analysis? Why not respond to my breakdown of the Final Order? Why not respond to any of the questions about the mining numbers? Counter my words with your own facts and logic. I could go on but what’s the point? The response will be feigned outraged about the lack of contact from the Vechery team instead of answering direct questions.

By the way, “face charges?” Charges for what? From whom? Is one of the seven faces of Sybil now channeling an imaginary district attorney? Charges can only be filed by a prosecutor. Libel and slander are civil offenses, not criminal. If criminal “charges” are going to be filed, it certainly appears that the man in the mirror would be the top priority. By the way, if lawsuits are to be filed then scary words such as “interrogatories and depositions” come into play. That would be fun. Greg Halpern would have to appear in court. When has that ever happened?

These are nothing more than braggadocios words from a keyboard warrior. One point that needs to be made, to my understanding, Harvey Vechery doesn’t post online. Unlike others. So how can he be accused of being slanderous in any way/ And as I’ve stated, I don’t take orders from anyone when I post. Point out the libel and slander. Or go file charges.

[jay14]

Evidence is there, it's up to Harvey Vechery now or face charges....

To sue for slander and libel there has to be evidence of the offense.

Besides slander and liable,
there has been,
No contact with
Greg Halpern,
who holds the property....

No contact with
the accountant....

No contact with
Delaware registration....

Over six months/seven weeks now,
and
no statement on company....
That statement should of been released
May 1....
No excuses, just Harvey Vechery's minions making noise....

Trammel is gone
and is not coming back,

from what I understand in the filings

Trammel couldn't do anything with the technology
and did has much as he could do....

He was paid $2Million and moved on....

[J Galt]

“Harvey Vechery should be sued for liable and slander from the deals that were lost!!!! YES, there were deals!!!!” Once again, this was the game plan all along. Can’t make money, sue someone for it. Halpern has no money. Harvey has money. Let’s target the guy who has something to lose. That was always the plan.

Claims of “life altering deals” for the shareholders. 50 deals in 50 days. $100m by year end. Beluga cars. Gold currency in Zimbabwe. Deals with native American tribes. Biometric Security. MAXD proprietary Mineral Mapping technology. Quadrillions” of dollars in Mexican gold mines. Mexican land deals in Cabo. Claims of deals in Mexico and Japan. A long list of inglorious non-achievements.

The plan was to play rope a dope and run the clock out. Then claim the deals failed due to Vechery interference and rile up the shareholders for a lawsuit. Where is the libel? Where is the slander? Find it for me. Spell it out. Post it.

For deals to be “lost” there had do be deals to begin with. No LOI or contract for Japan, only words on a paid, unedited, and uncontrolled website. To sue for slander and libel there has to be evidence of the offense. There is none that I can see from Harvey Vechery. On the other hand, the Hoodwinkers website is a treasure trove of both.

[uber darthium]

Are those new MAXD booties that Greg Jessica is wearing in order for our X CEO to reach the pedals ?

Short stupid and ugly has to be a terrible way to go through life


MAXD

[jay14]

More disgruntled information....Guess what;
new leadership....

Where's the statement from Harvey Vechery on the direction of the company????

No contact with the accountant....
NOTHING!!!!

No contact with Delaware registration....
NOTHING!!!!

What about that phone call????

[J Galt]

“Truth is No one has contacted Greg Halpern, who owns the technology.... MAXD, the company has licensing rights to the technology but it's owned by Greg Halpern.... Read the filings!!!!” This sounds like the Connie Nash strategy all over again. Were the signatures on this transaction forged as well?

The technology was purchased by MAXD, the company, from Lloyd Trammell, the inventor, in exchange for stock. I have posted the information direct from the SEC filings in the past. Greg Halpern did not purchase the technology, Max Sound did. As per the Final Order, Harvey Vechery now owns all property belonging to MAXD as he owns the company. I’m sure someone on the Vechery team will be contacting Halpern when they are ready. By the way, please post the specific “filings,” as I did, so we can all see the claim that Halpern owns the technology.

[J Galt]

“Forensic accounting was already done through the Google cases.... Also in the filing....lol Seriously.... “ The Google legal team only looked at two years of bank statements in the deposition in which Blaisure was called to testify. In forensic accounting, the researchers are always looking for specific areas of accounting that relates to their assignment. When they find what they are looking for, they generally close shop and move on.

In the Google deposition case, they were looking for ways to go after Greg Halpern. He had posted videos naming specific Google executives in defamatory ways. They were looking to take him down for it, and they did. They found the evidence of Halpern using corporate cards for personal gain, which allowed them to pierce the corporate veil and get personal judgments against the MAXD officers and company. That was an example of partial forensic accounting.

It’s always good to check out the definition of a word, or phrase, to see if it’s being used correctly. The phrase “forensic accounting” is understood to mean, “a type of accounting that investigates financial information for potential evidence of crimes. Forensic accountants use accounting, auditing, and investigative skills to understand whether a person or company has committed financial misconduct, such as embezzlement or fraud.”

The phrase “financial misconduct” covers a lot of territory and certainly applies to the Halpern years, both at Z-Trim as well as during his tenure as CFO and CEO of MAXD. Far too much money went into the MAXD and related accounts with no real return. MAXD shareholders have a right to an honest accounting.

It’s irrelevant whether Google or the bankruptcy trustee performed any form of forensic accounting as that was about Halpern's personal bankruptcy issues and not specific to the MAXD case. From everything I have read, the Mintz Levin law firm, brought into the case by the trustee, didn’t appear to perform detailed forensic work during the bankruptcy. Was this due to Harvey Vechery stepping in and agreeing to pay all debts for Halpern? That he agreed to pay off the house and additional fees to the lender to prevent further legal action against Halpern for apparently falsifying financial documents? Whatever the reason, a full forensic accounting of MAXD was not performed. It was a personal bankruptcy case for Greg Halpern, not a full forensic accounting of the entirety of MAXD.

The courts are backed up and don’t generally waste time when both parties agree, and the debts are paid. The bottom line is that a complete forensic accounting needs to be done for the entirety of the MAXD years. If Halpern has nothing to worry about, why debate this point? Allow it to happen so we all know the truth.

[jay14]

All statements that you want me to reply to
are bias because of the deal between a friend(your friend)
and Constance Nash,

And

here's the funny part,

Greg Halpern
had nothing to do with that deal
from what I was told....
FYI
I don't care!!!!

This is old news, posted on these message boards
years ago
that,
that deal was between you( a friend) and Constance Nash,

not Greg Halpern....


He had never ever heard of you
until after those shares where traded off
or
sold to that friend that was duped!!!!

Besides,
in that email I recieved from Greg Halpern,
he indicated that you two spoke just a few months ago(phone),

if this is true,

why haven't you said anything about that????

Deja Vu,
Glendale Holdings is now getting involved all-over, again....

That won't end well!!!!

It's a done deal,
Harvey Vechery is now new leadership,

and
it's time for him to come forward
with a statement on the direction and plan of the company
or
this whole thing was a charade!!!!
If it was a farce,
a charade, IMO
Harvey Vechery should be sued for liable and slander
from the deals that were lost!!!!


YES,
there were deals!!!!

[jay14]

Dissecting Turner,
is not being truthful....


Truth is
No one has contacted
Greg Halpern,
who owns the technology....

MAXD, the company has licensing rights to the technology
but
it's owned by Greg Halpern....
Read the filings!!!!

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the accountant!!!!

NOTHING!!!!

And

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the registration in Delaware!!!!

NOTHING!!!!

Where's the statement from new leadership
and direction of the company,
which should of been released May 1!!!!

[J Galt]

The statement made was, "What a bunch of nonsense from Harvey Vechery's minion...."

“Nonsense” is defined as “spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.” All of my words have meaning and make sense. If there are words that don’t fit those categories, please point them out. Respond to them with more than more “Zen Nothingness.”

“Minion” is defined as “a follower or underling of a powerful person, especially a servile or unimportant one.” I have never been servile to anyone on earth, powerful or not. I don’t serve Harvey Vechery, therefor I can’t be a minion. Furthermore, in order to be a “minion,” I would have to have met Harvey Vechery. Never happened. Be in contact with him. Never happened. Be taking instructions from him. Never happened. As I have repeatedly stated, I don’t take marching orders from anyone. Words have meaning.

As to being unimportant, that’s closer to the truth. I don’t have the same high opinion of myself that Halpern does and consider myself to be just another truth seeker on the road of life.

The balance of the post is just more of the same…wait for it…in your own words, NONSENSE!

[jay14]

What a bunch of nonsense from Harvey Vechery's minion....


Truth is
No one has contacted
Greg Halpern,
who owns the technology....

MAXD, the company has licensing rights to the technology
but
it's owned by Greg Halpern....
Read the filings!!!!

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the accountant!!!!

NOTHING!!!!

And

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the registration in Delaware!!!!

NOTHING!!!!

Where's the statement from new leadership
and direction of the company,
which should of been released May 1!!!!

[uber darthium]

I hear the little runt man Greg Jessie is being fitted for a Mini Cooper so she can see over the dashboard with her booster chair and little footie extensions.

I bet being a little runt and former CEO that got kicked out and exposed as a liar by the judge has got to suck

I guess we won’t be getting royalties from the In Ground Assets scam

MAXD

[J Galt]

Halpern also stated Vechery was; “ENGINEERING A MASSIVE ON-LINE DEFAMATION CAMPAIGN ON YAHOO FINANCE, YOUTUBE AND INVESTORHUB.” As I’ve stated many times before, Vechery neither designed nor engineered any campaign. No marching orders were ever sent. There was no coordination between Vechery and anyone posting on the boards that I’m aware of. I certainly was never contacted, nor have I ever talked with Vechery, Kapp, or anyone else in his organization. I’ve never posted anything on YOUTUBE either.

I was originally posting in favor of the MAXD technology and the general term “management.” Individual research led to understanding, awareness, and eventually, enlightenment as to what was really going on, with both the technology and the pumping schemes. Was my personal evolution coordinated? Was it engineered or designed by someone? No. My thought process and opinion about Greg Halpern and his technology changed as new information became available. Harvey Vechery didn’t engineer me to find the Z-Trim fraud case information, online Yahoo board posters Janoy, Louie, and Grant did. Are they part of Vechery’s online hit squad? Seems to me they’ve been banging the drums long before Vechery joined the band.

What is the “defamation” campaign Halpern mentions in his headline. Defamation is generally defined as “any false information that harms the reputation of a person, business, or organization. Defamation includes both libel and slander.” The key word is “false.” The statement must be false for there to be defamation. As I’ve stated many times in the past, show me any false information, or lies I’ve posted. You won’t find any. There can’t be defamation if there aren’t provable lies.

Furthermore, it would be hard for Halpern to claim defamation of character because he already destroyed his personal image all by himself. Did Harvey Vechery post last night Videos while in an obviously altered state? No. Videos recorded live and posted without editing. Videos where Halpern fell asleep on camera for almost ten minutes. Videos with Halpern calling out Google executives and federal judges by name, defaming and slandering them with unsubstantiated accusations of illegal and illicit behavior. Videos making fun of “uneducated southern rednecks” in some weird self-promotion gimmick. Videos inserting his image on stage during campaign rallies in a fake Q&A with Donald Trump. Each one of those “I’m For The Dream” videos were a form of “self-defamation” and would play heavily in any legal case. Defamation is difficult to prove in a court of law to begin with, but in Halpern’s case, it would be close to impossible as what he refers to as “100% known lies” are hard truths that can easily be proven.

[J Galt]

Former MAXD CEO Greg Halpern stated on his new website; “THEY INTENTIONALLY DESIGNED THEIR CAMPAIGN WITH 100% KNOWN LIES THAT THEY LEAKED DAILY ON STOCK CHAT BOARDS BY ENGAGING COMMON CRIMINALS WITH THE ONLY PURPOSE BEING TO HIDE THEIR OWN NUMEROUS CRIMES AND ENDLESS BUSINESS FAILURES.”

This is exactly what Halpern has been doing. “Leaking known lies daily” on various social media sites to hide his own “numerous crimes, endless business failures,” and overall villainy. Halpern has been engaging in other forms of social media messaging for many years where he “leaked daily on stock chat boards” information designed to influence the MAXD stock in a positive way, not to mention what he did at Z-Trim and Circle Group. Now he is leaking negative information to defame others and to deflect from his own misdeeds.

The “narrative assassination” is a phrase being bandied about in the news these days and has become a popular tool in the age of social media. This form of assassination is when someone creates a false narrative, designed to destroy the reputation of an individual, or business, without having to resort to old school elimination tactics. Part of the tactic is to begin posting false information online, as many times as possible, and on as many websites as they can find, with the hope that it goes viral.

What Halpern has done with his Hoodwinkers website, along with his latest version of online defamatory rhetoric found on his new website, is exactly that. An attempted character assassination of Harvey Vechery and his Key Brands company. Halpern is bragging about the news being “all over the boards.” The reason it’s all over the boards is because he intentionally placed it there.

[MD1941]

Facts:
Not one solid deal in fourteen years.
Less than $400k in total revenue over fourteen years.
Pushed a fake short squeeze.
Guaranteed a sizable settlement with Google.
Misrepresented his mining deal.
Misrepresented Formula Four Protocol.
Didn't disclose his Z-Trim problems.
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.
Cheated the biggest MAXD investor.
Abused corporate funding for a lavish lifestyle.
Didn't pay key developers.
Didn't file key filings with the SEC.
Put the stock on the Expert Market.
Embarrassed the company with crazy websites.
Questionable pumping activity.
Blew a deal with Pitbull.
Toxic behavior that chases away business.

[J Galt]

“Post, and Harvey Vechery's minions reply, with distortion....” Point out the exact distortion. Where is the spin? Where are the falsehoods and misrepresentations? When I dissect posts, I always point out my points of contention in a professional way and there is a reason and purpose to each one of my responses. Feel free to reciprocate.

Halpern always talks about reading comprehension issues. Well, I never said it was “in the court’s hands.” Show me where that statement was made. What I have said, repeatedly, is that the legal team is going through a step-by-step meticulous process to ensure there are no mistakes. Part of that involves the court, the other part involves moves behind the scenes to ensure they don’t have any “339” issues. I think most people can read between the lines and understand that Greg Halpern was not much for the details. Most people understand that taxes are meant to be paid, not ignored. They understand that monthly, quarterly, and annual fees and filings must be made to maintain standing and control of company rights. The "post-Halpern “cleanup on aisle five” is apparently more complicated than expected.


“There is NOTHING, legally stopping new leadership to put out a statement, which imo should of been released six weeks ago, May 1....” By the way, adding “imo” in a sentence does not mean you can ignore facts, no matter how convenient it may be to do so.

I never said they couldn’t legally put out a statement. Those are Halpern’s words, not mine. The agenda here seems to be to make shareholders think the Vechery team is incompetent and incapable of assembling words on paper. That’s an easy thing to do, as any professional can put out a PR. Halpern has repeatedly shown over the years that he can upload words to EIN PRESWIRE and make people believe they add up to something. Talk is cheap.

The new team is attempting to do the right thing and not repeat the numerous mistakes Halpern made. I’m sure the Vechery team will assemble the appropriate words and make them public when they are ready. However, freedom of speech allows anyone to scream, capitalize words, or promote the excessive use of exclamation marks.

Finally, I will repeat the fact that May 18th was the day of the Final Order, and nothing could be done legally prior to that date. It may have been backdated to April 28, but the first day inquires could legally be made was on the following day. But who’s counting?

[jay14]

Post, and Harvey Vechery's minions reply,
with distortion....

Facts,
even dissecting doesn't change that


No one has contacted
Greg Halpern....

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the accountant!!!!

NOTHING!!!!

And

Harvey Vechery has done NOTHING with the registration in Delaware!!!!

NOTHING!!!!

Minions want everyone to believe or
think that it's in the courts hands....
Half truth!!!!
There is
NOTHING,
legally stopping new leadership to put out
a statement,
which imo should of been released
six weeks ago,
May 1....

[MD1941]

I'm sure Halpern's expenditures will be far more than what Blaisure spent. The forensic accounting audit should sort out all of his nonsense. I think that it will be proven that Halpern's expenditures will fall into criminal territory.

I posted two SEC cases on prior posts that are nothing compared to what Halpern did. I'm guessing there must be a dart board methodology for picking cases. Halpern definitely deserves special handling for his nineteen years of games.

It's only a matter of time!

[J Galt]

The honesty test was failed with the inclusion of this statement; “Btw John Blaisure, from filings did have a company CC.” Stating that Blaisure had a company credit or debit card is not only revisionist history, but also a bald face lie, and Halpern knows it.

One can’t add the phrase “from filings” in an attempt to make it sound legit when it is untrue. I’ve seen ‘the filings,” and Blaisure never had a company card of any type. From the time he started as the MAXD CEO, right up until the end, he charged all his expenses on his personal cards and then turned them into the company monthly on a spread sheet. For that matter, he was not reimbursed for his expenses and still has an outstanding balance which Halpern has chosen to ignore. The only company card he ever had in his possession was the one Lloyd Trammell turned in when he left the company, and Blaisure never used it. Once again, the statement that John Blaisure had a MAXD credit card, at any point in time, is a fabrication designed to deflect from Halpern’s numerous financial missteps. In other words, it’s not just a prevarication, or even a common Halpern distortion of the facts, It is a complete falsehood. A lie.

The Google judgment is due to Halpern misusing the company card and had nothing to do with John Blaisure having a company card. Feel free to challenge me on this as I have all the receipts in this area.

Blaisure was also not paid for the last 15 months he worked at MAXD. That’s on the books as accrued salary as well. Making the statement that he, “was receiving monies(monthly paycheck) throughout his employment as CEO....” is another fictitious statement which can easily be proven to be false. Halpern is right, it is part of the filings. Just not in the way he thinks. It is part of the record. This is nothing more than an attempt to discredit Blaisure and bring him down to Halpern’s level. No one will believe these dishonest statements from the master of deception.