Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[J Galt]

You are correct. The default judgment was in favor of Harvey Vechery. Back in January. Halpern did not show for that date either. Did the attorney fail to mention that to Halpern almost four months ago? You were told that Halpern only found out about the court date last week? Even though it doesn’t matter, that’s probably because he no longer has an attorney of record listed. It was not on any of the documents I read. Just Greg Halpern and Max Sound. Therefore, it was Halpern’s responsibility to stay on top of scheduling. In other words, it’s a pretty lame excuse.

My first response is that a CEO in charge of a company should pay more attention to his legal status. In addition, it was certainly the topic of discussion on the boards the last few weeks. I think he would need to pay his attorney to ensure that he stays on top of important scheduling such as this court date. That might have been the “falling out” you are hypothesizing about.

You are saying that Halpern is telling you he gets a “Scooby Doo-over” with the court because he didn’t know about the date? That’s not the way it works. It’s a “dog ate my homework” level excuse. But it does sound like his no-show for the Google hearing which resulted in a judgment against MAXD, Blaisure, and Halpern. It also sounds like the judgment case in Chicago, and then sister judgment case in San Diego where he didn’t show. That was the 8-million-dollar judgment from the Z-Trim shareholders against Halpern.The old saying about “ignorance of the law is no excuse” pertains to Greg Halpern as well.

People have been talking about this date for weeks on the board. You can’t just not show up and then blame it on an attorney who was not even listed. Since Greg Halpern has a “no show” history when it comes to court appearances, I think this is nothing more than an attempt to deflect attention away from the source of the problems.

[jay14]

Default judgement in favor of HV....
From what I was told
Greg Halpern had just found out about April 28 hearing last week....

He never heard from his attorney, who also never contacted him or wouldn't return GH calls/email's....


There might of been a falling out between the two, however it was mentioned in a text that Greg Halpern is filing back against Harvey Vechery, and
Mr. Hanson....

Pandora's box is now open and this case most likely goes another year or more, imo....

Sadly, It won't be a quick fix for MAXD shareholders....

Btw
there's Harvey Vechery section's in the filing which is moot,
GH is majority shareholder holder....

[oak4life20]

Thank you

[J Galt]

Greg Halpern did not show up in court, nor did he send legal representation. From what I have been told, the court followed up on the January judgment and ruled in favor of Harvey Vechery and against Halpern. I’m waiting for the legal documents to be published so I can read the details and will post again at that point in time.

[oak4life20]

Sooo what happened in court????

[J Galt]

As one shareholder posted on another site, and another who was actually in court today stated, Greg Halpern has been removed from the company by court order. I will have to wait to read the court documents to have any details, but it appears justice was served for Harvey Vechery today and Greg Halpern was fired by the judge.

Everyone will need to be patient while Harvey’s attorneys, accountants, and administrators do their due diligence in getting the company back in line and upright. I am told this is already in the public record.

[J Galt]

I guess we will find out today if "what tenchi, rurouni, utise, jay and others have said is true."

It's now April 28th. To recap the public record: the court entered a default judgment in favor of Harvey Vechery and against Greg Halpern/Max Sound on January 11, 2023. The Vechery Family Trust then petitioned the court to render judgment in favor of the defendant, for relief demanded in the complaint, permanent injunction, and removal of Halpern from the company.

The case is scheduled at 11AM Pacific time today in the Superior Court of California County of San Diego and has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Timothy Taylor. This is the only date that counts right now. Not the May 19th date Halpern has been claiming to bring the SEC filings up to date. This is all part of the public record.

As to what comes next, let’s just wait and see what the court says today. As we all know, the results in our judicial system are not always predictable so we must all wait to hear the verdict. No matter what the court rules on the relief issue, the judgment is in place and must be satisfied.

[J Galt]

The point is how they came about this potential “truth.” How did Tenchi see the documents? How could it be “independent of GH?” He is the last man standing at MAXD. You can't just invent the truth. It has to come from someone.

What Tenchi posted is not yet public information. To top it off he posted it on a financial chat board. Publicizing non-public information is not allowed. It’s been going on for years and has mainly been used to promote the stock. Many people are tired of this lack of ethics.

As to MAFIP, I have been on the site in the past. Right up until they required information to even log on. Why would I ever want to give personal information to an overseas company connected to Greg Halpern? Why would I potentially corrupt my hard drive, as so often happens with these sites? They don’t follow the same rules and laws Yahoo and IHUB are required to adhere to in relation to the control of personal information. Not interested.

[Utuse]

unless what tenchi, rurouni, utise, jay and others have said is true... independent of GH.

ever find the address for mafip?

[J Galt]

Good points MD1941. Many people have speculated that Tenchi (on the other board) is just another alias for Greg Halpern. I don’t know and, as is the case with Huntington Beach/Jay14, I really don’t care. Jay14 has stated repeatedly that his is not Halpern, so I’ll take him at his word and move on. Same with Tenchi.

The point remains that both have posted information which could only come from a source inside MAXD. Since there is only one remaining officer, employee, and board member left in the organization, that would mean privileged information is being distributed in an unethical way by Greg Halpern. The comment MD mentioned, as posted by Tenchi, is just the latest example of that breach of ethics.

[MD1941]

Team Halpern posted the following message two days ago.

Tenchi
"The bank is reviewing the doc before issuing the funds from the Mexico land deal. I've seen the doc . . . shhhh"

I'm not sure how this person received insider information. Why would our CEO release this information to Tenchi? Why is Tenchi releasing this information? I don't even believe that the information is real. How does this deal relate to MAXD? Too many red flags!

[Alfred11]

Money is now on the subpoena list

[Alfred11]

BK con artist doesn't like the subpoenas

[J Galt]

Bigger fish and shrimp to fry or not, the Vechery vs MAXD/Greg Halpern court hearing is Friday morning at 11AM. The judgment that was issued in January will be followed up in this hearing with the request for relief and removal by the Vechery Family Trust. No one can forecast the outcome as the judicial system in this day and age is impossible to predict. Will Halpern show up or send an attorney? We shall see as that’s not normally how he plays the game. However, what happens Friday will go a long way in determining the future of the company.

[Utuse]

And these shrimps will fry

[jay14]

Enjoy your quest;

I've got bigger fish, and shrimp to fry....

[J Galt]

“From what I've read through Google searches is that no one has been able to stop Greg Halpern.”

“Stop” him? That is true. The fact that Halpern is motoring on like the Energizer plush bunny, continuing to use other people’s money on his road to nowhere, proves he has not been stopped. The fact is that light is a great disinfectant and truth usually catches up with deception. The Z-Trim shareholders have a judgment against Halpern for $8m plus. That didn’t stop him. Harvey Vechery has a judgment against Halpern and the next legal step will be addressed next Friday in court. Will that stop him? Probably not. He may no longer be with MAXD but I’m sure he’ll continue on his personal path.

“It’s not my fight!!!!”

I was addressing your comments, not you personally. However, when you make comments on behalf of someone else you need to be prepared to defend them.

“Financial bleeding , again, from what I have read in the filings, that isn't completely true.”

How can that be? 14 years of filings tell the story. The losses are mind boggling. Do the recent filings show bleeding? No, because Harvey Vechery has stopped loaning money to Halpern. There is no income and no money to burn. There is only one employee to pay and not R&D being done. The “financial bleeding” I was referring to is the value of the company, on the Expert Market, in the public domain, and on the balance sheet. It is most definitely being bled dry.


“HV just lost monetary, what will follow next????”

What does this even mean? Yes. HV has lost a great deal of money with MAXD and Halpern. What will follow next? He will probably get his justice and have Halpern removed by the court.

[jay14]

It's HV's prerogative....

Is part of his “agenda for justice” to remove Greg Halpern from his position in the company? Of course. Why would he not?
From what I've read through Google searches is that no one has been able to stop Greg Halpern,

And
it's not my fight!!!!

I'm a legitimate MAXD shareholder,
that now has to prove this, to some YouTube video maker, shrimp scraper and other noisemakers, because
Greg Halpern is suing YouTube video maker....lol
That's laughable in itself....

Financial bleeding ,
again
from what I have read in the filings, that isn't completely true,
but let's see what Lady Justice has to say,
rather than hearsay....

HV just lost monetary,
what will follow next????

Copying n pasting
to follow up
on to other message boards
and taken out of context....

[J Galt]

“What's coming is the end of Harvey Vechery's agenda....lol.”

Harvey Vechery’s initial agenda was to make money off his investment in MAXD. His subsequent agenda was to help Greg Halpern personally as a gesture of good faith and individual kindness. It was also, obviously, done to protect his initial investment in MAXD so he could fulfil his original agenda, to get a ROI.

Vechery's “agenda” was altered when he realized Halpern had not only been playing him false, but he had also been enriching himself through his deceptions. Vechery’s current agenda is to stop the financial bleeding and turn the company around so that he, as well as all shareholders, can get back to realizing his original agenda. It’s quite simple.

The court date next Friday will not end Harvey Vechery’s agenda, it will be a beginning of the return to sanity.

Is part of his “agenda for justice” to remove Greg Halpern from his position in the company? Of course. Why would he not? Halpern has made a mockery of the company and insulted everyone involved in the process. Whether through mismanagement or malfeasance, Halpern has taken a great idea and flown it directly into the Bermuda Triangle.

[jay14]

The joke will be on those, thinking I'm Greg Halpern....lol

Then I will turn around and return my own lawsuit....

A legitimate MAXD shareholder,
being sued by a non legitimate MAXD shareholder
for being a MAXD shareholder
and
not CEO,
Greg Halpern!!!!

Okay....

[jay14]

What's coming is the end of Harvey Vechery's agenda....lol

How's that YouTube video coming????lol

[Homebrew]

Handcuffs ?

bankrupt con artist Greg Halpern has NO idea what is coming

[Alfred11]

bankrupt con artist Greg Halpern has NO idea what is coming

[Utuse]

Bob Loblaw?

[MD1941]

It's not a crime to put a stock on the Expert Market. In your case your CEO is probably just as unethical as our CEO. I blame him for taking the toxic debt in the first place. It's pretty low to take the money and then cry about the terms. Your CEO topped it off with an underhanded move. Who was protecting shareholders from a "nefarious" CEO? Your CEO pulled a classic deflection tactic. The real problem is your reckless CEO.

Is there a competent board that can oust your CEO? Did he blow the money like Halpern did?

[uber darthium]

Is it a criminal act to purposefully put a ticker into the EM ? I have an extant case of another ticker the CEO did exactly that to allegedly “protect” his shareholders from nefarious toxic financiers. I have wondered about the legal ramifications of the fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders and how a CEO gets away with this act except that .0001 no one is going to file suit for damages.

This is also applicable in MAXD

What say you ?

[uber darthium]

PM tomorrow 4-5 eastern happy hour…. Be there


MAXD

[J Galt]

“Greg implores everyone to pay ZERO attention to ANYONE that posts legal or operational information of Greg or MAXD.”

Of course, he implores! He can also beg, beseech, and plead for us to disregard the truth, but the information is in the public domain and will not be ignored.

Why would Halpern want anyone to know the truth about his current legal status? His minions post comments mocking the legal system with the same contempt Halpern has always shown.

His arrogant and condescending attitude toward federal judges, made famous on his slanderous Vimeo rants against them, cost MAXD the Google case.

He’s now walking the green mile to a court date next Friday that will more than likely have consequences beyond his control. Or comprehension. “Greg implores?” That actually made me laugh out loud! Thanks for that! Great way to start the day!

[J Galt]

“Noisemakers keep hiking trails,
18 years of not taking profits....
Who does that!!!!”

I’ve never understood what’s so hard to comprehend about the “taking profits” accusations. If an investor buys shares on the market at $.10 and is told it is shortly going to be over a dollar, why would he sell before the stock hit the projected mark? Of course, you could sell on the way up to get part or all of your investment back, but that’s not what we were advised to do. Furthermore, we were investing in the product, the company, and the belief in the management and their ability to bring it home. For that reason, we were buying stock all the way up to $.77 before it started going down. We weren’t worried because we didn’t invest to make a quick buck and were being told to not only hang tight, but to buy more! This was all back at the very beginning of the company of course, before we were enlightened by new information.

Fast forward, thing happened, and the bottom fell out. Therefore, it you bought at ten cents or over, should you be selling below that rate? Should we sell stock purchased at ten cents when it jumps from .0003 to .019? Why? It’s still a loss. Unless you need a tax write off, it’s nonsensical. Furthermore, we weren’t on the short list of those being told when to buy and when to sell. Just like with Nestle and Z-Trim.

[MD1941]

Team Halpern sums up the fourteen years of MAXD with "Blah blah blah....". Team Halpern absolutely nailed it!

I believe that the Expert Market move could be spun as a criminal act. I still believe that he did this to avoid a forensic accounting audit. What normal person would squat at a $56.00 company after fourteen years of failure?

When do we get that Japan update?

Can we get the new pictures from the mining site? How about a picture of our CEO's custom mining trailer?

Exciting times in fantasy land!

[jay14]

Blah blah blah....

[J Galt]

Why the continuing aversion to copy and pasting? Aren’t they all words a poster should stand behind?

As to the specific quote I pasted, it’s called leaving a hanging curveball over the plate, dude! Low hanging fruit and all that. The original response was to the April 28th date, and it was stated there was ”no need to show up.” I would hardly classify that as “irrelevant information from yesteryear.” It was clearly stated that the case was already won so no need for Halpern to attend. That’s not irrelevant, it’s outright deceptive. Even though Halpern has a history of not showing up for court hearings, I still think readers need to know the truth.

Why would phone calls I received be considered “hearsay?” Legally it’s correct as no third party was involved, but why would anyone doubt I received phone calls from shareholders asking questions? It happens all the time. In this case they read Alfred’s post and called to hear what I knew about it. For the record, many shareholders consider this MAXD investment to be a losing cause. Maybe fortunes will change on the 28th.

By the way, GoFundMe has nothing to do with me, but I love the use of old Bobby McFerrin lyrics!

[jay14]

Awesomeness, copy and paste and
then using my
one line
with irrelevant information
from yesteryear....lol

As far as those (hearsay)phone calls go;
good for the cause,
losing cause....
You'll have GoFundMe soon:
Don't Worry Be Happy....

[J Galt]

It was stated; “No need to show up, case was over in December 2022....”

“No need to show up?” That’s why Halpern has an $8m judgment from the Z-Trim shareholders against him. Because he believed there was no need to show up. That’s why he has a $900k plus judgment against him from Google Because he believed there was no need to show up. Since he’s apparently not going to show up on the 28th, I guess he can check in on the boards to see how things turned out.

The case being referred to in the last post was the bankruptcy case. The judgment rendered was for the MAXD corporate obligation to the Vechery Family Trust. The court date on Friday April 28th is the next legal step after the judgment.

I’ve actually received several phone calls from shareholders after Alfred posted his “April 28th date. For clarity, and to counter the court information just posted, the court entered a default judgment in favor of Harvey Vechery and against Greg Halpern and Max Sound on January 11, 2023. The Vechery Family Trust then petitioned the court to render judgment in favor of the defendant, for relief demanded in the complaint, permanent injunction, and removal of Halpern from the company. This has nothing to do with the bankruptcy case.

In case Greg Halpern needs the information, the court date for this hearing is next Friday, April 28 at 11AM in the Superior Court of California County of San Diego. The case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Timothy Taylor. That is the only date that counts. Not the May 19th date Halpern has been claiming to bring the SEC filings up to date. Of course, he would have to still be here to file. This is all part of the public record by the way.

[uber darthium]

See what I mean about instant posts ? Greg is worried about individuals that incorrectly publish things alleged to be on his behalf but that he has no control or input thereto. Certain individuals have no problem stalking him and stalking courtroom proceedings, always available to provide quick responses (true or false). The suspect individual has got to have a screw loose for MAXD but it is obviously a bit creepy to see instant replies on certain social media.

The guy from the beach has issues and wants so bad to be a groupie

I can see why Greg is worried for his own safety

Meanwhile, for MAXD, it could appear that Greg “GH” Halpern has mastered or is mastering the art of CEI, so that he can bring some lively interesting times into the boardroom. Through the persuasive use of Greg’s CEI talents, there should be some very prosperous enlightening and enjoyable board meetings lasting late into the evenings. We are hoping this helps MAXD close deals. Hopefully Greg will have this CEI thing licked in the very near future


MAXD

[jay14]

No need to show up, case was over in December 2022....

Chapter 7 Trustee's Final Account, Certification that the Estate has been Fully Administered and Application of Trustee to be Discharged filed on behalf of Trustee Ronald E. Stadtmueller .
The United States Trustee has reviewed the Final Account, Certification that the Estate has been Fully Administered and Application of Trustee to be Discharged.
The United States Trustee does not object to the relief requested. Filed by US Trustee (Jason Cha) (Entered: 12/27/2022)

Case Closed!!!!lol

[J Galt]

“April 28, in a week from this Friday, right????
That's round two.”

If this is round two, what was round one? That would have been when the court entered a default judgment in favor of Harvey Vechery against Halpern on January 11, 2023.

As has always been the case, Halpern did not show up for his court date or send legal representation. Therefore, a default judgement was issued against him.

Just like when he didn’t show in Chicago court and a judgment was granted to the Z-Trim shareholders.

Just like when he didn’t show up in San Diego and a “sister court” judgment was issued against him for over $8 million dollars.

Just like he didn’t show in court against Google, and they got a default judgment against Halpern, Blaisure, and Max Sound.

Halpern has a track record of thumbing his nose at the court and getting judgments rendered against him in response. He loses every legal battle, and his minions spin it to make people think he won.

[jay14]

IDK, I guess, everyone has different reasons for entering the market....

Houses keep declining in price,
it might be a good time to purchase....

I think the 8K mentioned something about May, with reporting....

Noisemakers keep hiking trails,
18 years of not taking profits....
Who does that!!!!

I'm hoping for revenue numbers and projected revenue numbers,
And
if things are good, sure,
a new home....

That does sound like a most excellent idea!!!!


Copy and paste coming soon
to a message board close by....lol

[Coo breeze]

Jay, in a month's time, if all is good, will I be able to buy a house ?

[jay14]

April 28, in a week from this Friday, right????
That's round two,
and soon money trail
Harvey Vechery going buh bye....
Look, a seagull eating shrimp....

Talk about hanging out at the
SD Court House
lol YouTube video maker, with more um, um, um nothing....

What's next when that money train, when
Harvey Vechery runs dry;
GoFundMe????

Btw
HB doing just fine hanging out on the sand not inside, but outside looking in....lol

Cyaaa,
copy and paste, edited
to other message boards soon....lol

[jay14]

Ask the poster,
who's been in touch with Greg Halpern lol....

Bad transfer agent crying, again....

[MD1941]

How's the mining and Japan deal working out? We need a new CEO that will bring back credibility!

[jay14]

How's that video working out??? lol

[Alfred11]

Bankrupt con artist GH is finished on the 28th

[J Galt]

Is this the same Greg Halpern who has repeatedly bragged about his martial arts expertise for many years now. The same Halpern who has posted videos of himself performing his judo moves. The same Halpern who has challenged shareholders and board posters to matches in the ring, and told them to bring friends to help? This Steven Seagal wannabe is now afraid of a poorly dressed surfer dude who hangs out in moot court? I don’t think so.

Halpern has talked to individual shareholders about the Asian market for several years now. He has promoted Rurouni as the leader of the Asian team. Tenchi, Rurouni, Ronin, shiro, and Ken have all talked about the masterless Samurai over the years. Halpern has posted videos with Bruce Lee in the background. Suddenly this is all a fantasy concocted by some beach boy. Again, I don’t think so. This seems to be a manufactured claim to distance himself from the failed deals, nonexistent characters portrayed on the board as real people, non-public information being posted over the years, and the probability that any deal in Asia is not large enough to save the company. Or a complete fantasy.

By the way, I specifically remember Rurouni posting minutes after the court session was completed that MAXD won a victory in court against Google. Of course, it was not true. Was the beach dude responsible for that too?

[J Galt]

“Logically inconsistent as it ignores other facts that are in evidence like Rand herself.”

Explain exactly what is “logically inconsistent” or “ignoring facts that are in evidence” in my post. For once, be specific so I can address your comments one by one.

Posting lies alongside truth is inconsistent and begs the question why anyone would think that is wise business for Halpern or the company? If one truly understood Ayn Rand and the Galt relationship they wouldn’t make such a statement.

“MaxD always a marathon never a sprint.”

This marathon has been going on for over a decade. Mainly because we have a CEO who doesn’t have the attitude of a sprinter or a closer. Instead, we have a distance runner without a moral compass who can never locate the finish line.

“GH has the rights to those images and conversations as GH owns the tech on which those were created/distributed.”

My point was missed entirely. GH is posting provable lies and now claims are being made that he has the rights to them? I wasn’t specifically speaking of the voice recordings. Yes, they are on his phones. I’m talking about nude photos he does not have permission to post. That’s considered revenge porn in many states. I’m referring to specific lies throughout the website. Also, recording someone without their knowledge and permission is illegal in many states. Not to mention unethical.

“Others with large investors aside from HV aren't complaining; why?”

There’s a difference between complaining behind the scenes and posting on a chat board. Most readers on these boards never post. I’ve been a reader since 2012 yet never posted until a few years ago. I personally know many investors in MAXD who have been disgusted with Halpern’s social media and Vimeo presence for many years and want him gone. Just because they have not been heard form YET doesn’t mean they won’t be heard at the right time.

“Where you see obsession; I see restraint.”

I’m not referring to “obsession” or “restraint,” I’m referring to the morality of posting lies and deceptions for personal gain. The absolute arrogance to post deceitful information that Halpern has been legally notified to remove speaks for itself. Restraint? You think because he doesn’t exposed all the information he’s collected in his files is an example of restraint? His past behavior demonstrates his lack of restraint.

[5under]

If several years of false promises is slow, then yes this is slow, but there has been no progress. HB knows and talks to Halpern.

[5under]

There has been a marathon of missed projections and no revenue.

[uber darthium]

I would not be surprised to Greg “GH” Halpern hire private security to protect himself and the company from stalkers and MAXD wannabe like a certain social media poster who also shares the alias _Beach. Greg is getting quite concerned about all that Japanese crap, the Samurai crap, and a bit nervous every time something happens in court, this individual posts pleadings only seconds later.

All that Japanese Ruoni stuff is over the top and indicates a very sick demented mind of the poster.

MAXD is making slow steady progress

MAXD

[Utuse]

J Galt,
Logically inconsistent as it ignores other facts that are in evidence like Rand herself.

MaxD always a marathon never a sprint. Consider GH has the rights to those images and conversations as GH owns the tech on which those were created/distributed - digitally unwise Hoodwinkers at minimum. R/R/T/S/J are who they say - verifiable using search. Others with large investors aside from HV aren't complaining; why?

Where you see obsession; I see restraint.