Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That's amazing to me. Could be they will come under some kind of smear. The FDA can hardly say anything good about anything natural like Vit.D except for some bats in a Chinese cave. They would block the sun if they could.
No FDA approval…
“The WAVwatch is not FDA approved or considered a medical device. Testimonies are strictly volunteer and no one has been reimbursed for their testimony.”
Source: WAVwatch.
However difficult it is for LQMT to succeed and have less than a handful of major customers. They are seeking a broader market.
Yes, exactly, it is as though someone is sitting on and sidelining this company.
Is anyone familiar with the WAVwatch? It seems to monitor many health indications. So they must have gotten FDA device approval.
On another point, I cannot understand why we have not had more communication and updates to speak of regarding the Evie ring.
I don't know of another pink ticker that does not promote their own product or service. Especially a developing technology like what we have here.
If they truly want to grow the company and make sales then how about some promotion efforts. Hell, we don't even get a pump.
Maybe the pump needs to be primed!
Feel kinda sorry for him…he is the only one reads it. Must get paid by the word!
I hope it qualifies as therapy.
Another week passes and LQMT’s share price is up almost 1% from 0.05895 cents to 0.0594 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.
LQMT will be going into its 30th consecutive month without a new contract announcement for the order of parts from any existing or new customers.
So what’s new?
Absolutely nothing! Nothing is new! Does this mean LQMT is not advancing towards a new deal? No! It just means LQMT will continue to share news only when they are legally required to according to their own statements or until the COB takes the muzzles off. Don’t hold your breath. Sort of the way the ccp runs things abroad. Sort of the way companies here use to do the same with their employees: “we don’t pay you to talk, we pay you to work! “
Other than that speculation, speculation, speculation & FOMO.
There is a possibility that LQMT, if they are still engaged with the ring company, could see a bump up if the ring company receives as expected FDA approval in July.
Share price is holding in the low pennies. Now holding in the low to upper 0.05’s. The walk back down is usually slow after a run up. LQMT may very well hit the 0.04’s before the next 10Q2 is out.
A half a year has gone by and TC, like the trading volumes are producing Bubkis this year and decreasing shareholder value since the beginning of 2024. As stated earlier. This decrease is despite an increase in revenues for the first quarter and a potential to increase annual revenues YOY by year’s end.
As stated a gazillion times: with anemic trading volumes the share price means BUBKIS!
Earlier in the week it looked like LQMT might close above the nickels. But any new interest faded quickly and share trades remain anemic.
There is always speculation that any anemic increase in volume means something positive up ahead.
It would appear to me the LQMT silence has created this abyss of anemic trading. Perhaps to gain trust from a potential customer. To that end they have succeeded. On the other end there are negative reasons from scam to they are doing squat to ccp control of any information vis-à-vis Lugee Li. As long as there is silence any dart will stick. The same logic used when stating paper will not refuse ink.
Even some of the most positive bullish investors have stated they would be out of here if it hits 0.50 cents or a dollar a share! That to me is neither positive nor bullish. Nothing wrong with taking a profit at any price, but rolling the dice to me means $5, $10, $15 or more. Seems impossible right now due to the many failures to succeed. It is IMO, why those who are bullish will logically sell out along with those who are not.
Perhaps in 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2024, all in it will be very thankful and glad that they did.
FOMO lives and is probably the main reason why anyone holds on regardless of any other opinion at this time. Not wanting to take a loss at this point is another.
I try to present a balanced view based on the facts not on the emotions of anyone hyping or bashing LQMT. I believe I nailed it correctly. This board has had it correct past and present from potential to expectations to hope to FOMO.
Unfortunately LQMT can still hit the 02’s. Not my wish. The performance of LQMT will decide that.
No matter what anyone’s views are for LQMT going forward. The fundamentals have not changed. That is the reality of the downside. To the upside imo, an investor should be prepared to look much further ahead as the CEO has stated LQMT has a chance of breaking even this year. Then again TC could be mistaken. And breaking even at the costs of LQMT doing business from operations at these low levels doesn’t do anyone any favors. HOW ABOUT A MULTI MILLION DOLLAR CONTRACT? TC did not seem to confident in that happening soon.
There is potential for a modest contract announcement to correct the southerly direction LQMT has been heading for the past seven years. If anyone is looking to earn some lunch money, this year could be the time to be in LQMT. The potential I speak of is based on the commentary from TC.
There is also the cloud surrounding the ring and LQMT. Perhaps either company might be able to break through those clouds with a little sunshine.
That cloud still persists as the ring company awaits FDA approval during the 2nd or 3rd quarter. As stated before a positive decision should bump up LQMT as increased ring sales would be perceived to mean increasing revenues for LQMT. It’s worth the speculative gamble imo, and may result in a short term profit for all and could turn it to be a source of continued revenue.
Recently, Movano shed some light and iterated what they have already stated their plans were for this year and beyond. A relaunch of B2C and a possible new launch of B2B this year. Possible FDA APPROVAL IN JULY.
LQMT has stated at least for the 10Q1, they are still in the game with consecutive quarters showing income from the ring company without a contract.
Would be nice to see an announcement for a high volume reoccurring order again. Could send LQMT up. Way up depending on the contract terms. I hope whatever the contract terms are, they will be better than the ones LQMT usually settles for.
My bet is on one present and one former executive who hold at least 1 million shares and I’m not talking about LL, regardless of how low the SP goes.
Will this be the year revenues increase consistently? Only the 2nd, 3D, and 4th Q’s will tell.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
CEO, Tony Chung, painted a rosy picture for LQMT this year during his CC, for all in LQMT. Especially for outside shareholders, I hope his picture this time, is worth more than just a thousand words to make our shares worth more than just three, four, five, six or seven cents. So far this year his artwork is now beginning to decline in value again.
Why am I not surprised?
I still maintain the view that up until now has been unassailable far as I can tell, which is that the fate of LQMT and its outside shareholders, is a consequence of the Chinese long announced plan and well known actions, to dominate and take technology lead from wherever they can. Every measurable performance number, be it sales or financial, supports that. conclusion. For 8 years following Hong Kong taking control. Especially of IP and the brand. I don't know how anyone can reasonably avoid it.
All of 26k shares traded by 12:30….I wonder if we will get a big bump in the last hour again.
On 6/19/2024 we will celebrate the 3 month anniversary of the Amorphology announcement. One would hope/expect some sort of communication on what the players had in mind and what progress has transpired toward attaining those goals.
I see another patent or perhaps a series of patents pertaining to other parameters for improved accuracy such as O2, BP etc.
💯💯Movano Health Applies Advanced AI through Deep Learning To Deliver Improved Accuracy Of Heart Rate In Motion
Benzinga - 9:17 AM ET 6/13/2024 Investment News
Email Facebook. Twitter. LinkedIn.
Movano Health (Nasdaq: MOVE) announced major advances in the accuracy of its heart rate in motion algorithm following the implementation of deep learning into the processing. The Company recently released an engineering accuracy study directed by Movano Health Founder and CTO Michael Leabman, Enhanced Heart Rate in Motion Accuracy with the Evie Ring Using Advanced Deep Learning Algorithms, which demonstrates the value of deep learning integration into heart rate (HR) algorithms for improved accuracy.
both areas giants
Amen. So this MIT is a pretty strong endorsement for Movano.
I think MIT is still one of the universities that maintains a high
entrance examination requirement and with a president that actually did not
plagiarize their dissertation. Had this been Harvard I would probably go short.
On anemic volumes LQMT up 16% from Friday’s close. Also up 24% from two weeks ago on very little liquidity. Is something brewing? Is there progress and others are accumulating in anticipation for a deal down the road? Are any of the handful of insiders looking to buy? Or is this the same old, I think LQMT’s share price is being manipulated again on expectations of positive news expected?
One thing is for sure. LQMT remains silent.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Anyway it looks good on paper.
I’m coming to the sad realization that this is a dead stock. I think some factory comes online this summer, so I’ll probably hold through the end of the year, but I think 2025 will need to be the year I drop LQMT, and even more difficultly, my dreams of life changing wealth coming from this stock. So many other stocks have skyrocketed since 2016 when I got back in. I’ve held most of the time since 2010. Hell, I guess Apple might still want us for their coming foldables, but will we get paid or even a mention? No one knows but I feel like a guy standing by the freeway as literally every other stock on earth has blown by in the last 8 years. Meanwhile my nest egg is parked at 6 cents
Pearl Necklace?
Laughter - Tomcat
P.S. Who bot all the shares offered at the end of the day?
Man, if Research didn't post here, it would be a ghost town.....
™…
https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/search/search-results
Maybe someone else out there can shed some light.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Golf clubs?
Surgical?
Thanks for the advice.
As Robert MacNamara said “there are things you know, there are things you don’t know and there are things you don’t know you don’t know”. Be careful about the ones you don’t know exist.
Yep, Tony Chung had his fingerprints all over the failed deals made with Visser, Apple and the Lugee in all of our noses. What an effin genius of disinvestment.
because I don’t know
Don't get so bent out of shape by a poster whose credentials are operating room technician. Really!
I laughed out loud. Nice one!
If TC is as brilliant as I think, he will sell LM's rights to Movano in perpetuity for $20,000. It's this kind of wisdom that keeps me holding on.
My point exactly. My opinion is Apple may not be the only one interested in acquiring Movano.
I don’t know why everyone keeps talking blood pressure monitoring. Or glucose. They haven’t applied for that. Movano applied for FDA medical device clearance on Evie’s pulse oximeter, which includes heart rate and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) data. BP/Glucose is years down the road for a device like this. If ever.
RFI…you seem to indicate that Movano’s ability to accurately measure blood glucose is years down the road but I am reluctant make a statement like that because I don’t know. The fact that they are talking about it confirms that it’s on their radar and they see a path to success….that’s all I expect. If RF is a dead end, they will adjust accordingly..
Just a point of clarification - Dexcom is not an insulin or other pharmaceutical drug manufacturer. Their device measures blood glucose. So they aren't in the business of delivering medication. They are in the business of delivering data so that one can make sound decisions on insulin dosages. If Movano's ring could accurately measure blood glucose, Dexcom would take a serious hit.
Let’s talk a bit about the definition of “truth” especially when the measurement of medical parameters. Multiple readings with any instrument will result in a certain amount of “scatter” in the results and the tightness of the grouping (think rifle range) is the precision of the instrument to measure that parameter. If the grouping is tight, it may or may not be accurate (again think rifle range with a tight grouping 6” from the center of the target). Typically the first to arrive gets to define “truth” and everyone else is compared to that benchmark thus creating a barrier to entry for subsequent arrivals. I’m sure Dexcom had to deal with the comparison with finger sticks.
An aside…my wife and I have had numerous discussions about oven temperatures…our oven will say it is 350 degrees but the second thermometer in the oven only says 325 so we adjust the oven until the second thermometer says 350 but which one is really accurate?? Do we need a third thermometer? Average the results?
Back to reality…I’m sure there is a “gold standard” someplace that includes a $50k instrument that is both precise and accurate but not necessarily fast. That should be the benchmark and let the chips fall where they may. I’m sure that Movano is aware of all this and feels confident in their approach or it would have abandoned it long ago.
It is obvious to some that the FDA can be influenced politically. And that in many cases the FDA deck is stacked with former executives of various industries who may have a bias. Not saying they are biased. But can you list any of the companies seeking FDA approval regarding the areas of which Movano is seeking approval. The technology that movano is researching would benefit Dexcom. As they are in the business of delivering medication based on CGM.
In any event, one step at a time to me equates to years away and not months. In present time the game plan is for movano to get their act together iron out there software, manufacturing and delivery kinks and receive FDA approval for oxygen levels to have a successful relaunch. Otherwise they are just another smart ring swimming with the competition for consumer demand.
It’s interesting that the FDA admits that it hasn’t evaluated ANY of the devices that claim to be able to measure blood glucose without piercing the skin. One would think that the FDA would be interested in any approach that didn’t compromise skin integrity.
Basically, It says that “we haven’t done our job” so you shouldn’t go down this path.
The text sounds a whole like t was written by Dexcom who convinced the FDA to issue it under their letterhead.
First is blood pressure, next is glucose monitoring followed by testosterone/dopamine/melatonin etc….one step at a time
The following FDA warning may be a plausible reason why the ring lost value. Although it has no impact on future ring applications seeking approval it does warn all consumers on what is presently out there regarding blood sugar monitoring AKA CGM. CGM stands for continuous glucose monitoring.
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/do-not-use-smartwatches-or-smart-rings-measure-blood-glucose-levels-fda-safety-communication
Many sometimes have a narrow view of the importance of what a new medical device can do or how it might impact competition. It is not that many are narrow minded. Sometimes we see things unknowingly with blinders.
Within my portfolio I own shares in companies with expertise in CGM. In a few of my past posts I mentioned two of them, Dexcom & Tandem. It’s not just Apple who would be interested in the technology or product in which that ring company is trying to develop.
https://www.dexcom.com/en-us/compatibility/g7
The best part is no matter what company we think might be interested in a FDA approved ring, if LQMT is a part of it, all invested in LQMT will benefit from it, if and or whenever it happens.
It is just another speculative reason to check out LQMT. Could be another reason why TC purchased LQMT stock recently.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Another week passes and LQMT’s share price is up 8.484% from 0.05434 cents to 0.05895 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.
It’s been awhile since LQMT closed higher for the week. Not since April 12. And even though revenues pleasantly surprised me with an increase as well as potential from TC. The share price dropped lower instead of holding onto the 7’s as predicted and explained just using common sense.
LQMT is now into its 29th consecutive month without a new contract announcement for the order of parts from any existing or new customers.
So what’s new?
By way of LQMT releasing a PR or a new blog message to inform any outside shareholder? For the past 11 weeks of any progress. Absolutely nothing! Nothing is new! Does this mean LQMT is not advancing towards a new deal? No! It just means LQMT will continue to share news only when they are legally required to according to their own statements or until the COB takes the muzzles off. Don’t hold your breath. Sort of the way the ccp runs things abroad. Sort of the way companies here use to do the same with their employees: “we don’t pay you to talk, we pay you to work! “
There is a possibility that LQMT, if they are still engaged with the ring company, could see a bump up if the ring company receives as expected FDA approval in July.
Share price is holding in the low pennies. Now holding in the low to upper 0.05’s. The walk back down is usually slow after a run up. LQMT may very well hit the 0.04’s before the next 10Q2 is out.
A half a year has gone by and TC, like the trading volumes are producing Bubkis this year and decreasing shareholder value since the beginning of 2024. As stated earlier. This decrease is despite an increase in revenues for the first quarter and a potential to increase annual revenues YOY by year’s end.
As stated a gazillion times: with anemic trading volumes the share price means BUBKIS! An example of this was on a trading day this week, when about $15 thousand dollars worth of stock traded to raise the share price over 5%.
It would appear to me the LQMT silence has created this abyss of anemic trading. Perhaps to gain trust from a potential customer. To that end they have succeeded. On the other end there are negative reasons from scam to they are doing squat to ccp control of any information vis-à-vis Lugee Li. As long as there is silence any dart will stick. The same logic used when stating paper will not refuse ink.
Even some of the most positive bullish investors have stated they would be out of here if it hits 0.50 cents or a dollar a share! That to me is neither positive or bullish. Nothing wrong with taking a profit at any price, but rolling the dice to me means $5, $10, $15 or more. Seems impossible right now due to the many failures to succeed. It is IMO, why those who are bullish will logically sell out along with those who are not.
Perhaps in 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2024, all in it will be very thankful and glad that they did.
FOMO lives and is probably the main reason why anyone holds on regardless of any other opinion at this time. Not wanting to take a loss at this point may be another.
I try to present a balanced view based on the facts not on the emotions of anyone hyping or bashing LQMT. I believe I nailed it correctly. This board has had it correct past and present from potential to expectations to hope to FOMO.
Unfortunately LQMT can still hit the 02’s. Not my wish. The performance of LQMT will decide that.
No matter what anyone’s views are for LQMT going forward. The fundamentals have not changed. That is the reality of the downside. To the upside imo, an investor should be prepared to look much further ahead as the CEO has stated LQMT has a chance of breaking even this year. Then again TC could be mistaken.
There is potential for a contract announcement to correct the southerly direction LQMT has been heading for the past seven years. If anyone is looking to earn some lunch money, this year could be the time to be in LQMT. The potential I speak of is based on the commentary from TC.
There is also the cloud surrounding the ring and LQMT. Perhaps either company might be able to break through those clouds with a little sunshine.
That cloud still persists as the ring company awaits FDA approval during the 2nd or 3rd quarter. As stated before a positive decision should bump up LQMT as increased ring sales would be perceived to mean increasing revenues for LQMT. It’s worth the speculative gamble imo, and may result in a short term profit for all and could turn it to be a source of continued revenue.
Recently, Movano shed some light and iterated what they have already stated their plans were for this year and beyond. A relaunch of B2C and a possible new launch of B2B this year.
LQMT has stated at least for the 10Q1, they are still in the game with consecutive quarters showing income from the ring company without a contract.
Would be nice to see an announcement for a high volume reoccurring order again. Could send LQMT up. Way up depending on the contract terms. I hope whatever the contract terms are, they will be better than the ones LQMT usually settles for.
My bet is on one present and one former executive who hold at least 1 million shares and I’m not talking about LL, regardless of how low the SP goes.
Will this be the year revenues increase consistently? Only the 2nd, 3D, and 4th Q’s will tell.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
CEO, Tony Chung, painted a rosy picture for LQMT this year during his CC, for all in LQMT. Especially for outside shareholders, I hope his picture this time, is worth more than just a thousand words to make our shares worth more than just three, four, five, six or seven cents. So far this year his artwork is now beginning to decline in value again.
Why am I not surprised?
All of your BS about you posting your posts are here. Not one shred of proof of any direct communications you ever had with the CEO at the time you claimed to have bought shares. Although you have been asked many times to show these emails since then, you show no proof. The reason is because you never ever had any direct communications with the former CEO, as you state back in 2020. This is my opinion based on your refusal to show any proof they exist.
Everyone here who ever asked you to show proof I believe feels the same way.
Here are the first posts if anyone else wants to read them regarding your miraculous private emails or as you also refer to them as direct communications:
190184
190191
190195
190199
190201
190204
IMO, You believe yourself to be smarter than everyone else. You believe everyone else buys into your BS. You are in constant denial of facts. There is a term for it. Look it up.
By the way I don’t think you are a fool and I would not imply that anyone else is. Entertaining yes. A fool never.
You can skirt the issue. Dance all around it. Reply as ambiguous as you can to a direct question. Or never ever directly answer it as you often do, when someone asks you a question about what you say or state.
It’s not my thing to engage in this distraction. Sometimes the less said the better.
Take the hint from the last sentence above. It’s called a gentleman’s agreement.
You focus on LQMT your way and everyone else will focus on LQMT their way.
I know it is old and redundant to point out the state of LQMT. But they are not complaints. They are facts. And if they feel like broken records to you I feel the same way about them too. But they are not in anyway my broken records. They are the same old and redundant broken records of LQMT’s accomplishments good or bad. Try not to confuse the messenger of the facts with the company producing the facts and we will get along just fine.
Whether you believe it or not, all here want to see LQMT succeed regardless of their opinions on the company. My agenda is for LQMT to succeed. My opinions on the company are based on what I believe are factual. If I have stated a fact incorrectly point it out. I will correct it.
I don’t know what other start ups LQMT has in mind for later this year to publicly disclose. I do know the market sectors they are exploring. But sometime down the road, (probably four or five years depending on the advancement in nano technology RF technology) and here are the biggest ifs: If the ring company is successful at developing ring that can measure BP to the FDA’s liking, and if they are still using the LQMT amorphous metal, LQMT will along with the ring company go well past the moon and beyond.
Another If: if anyone out there believes they have plenty of time left on earth, that speculative possibility would be the speculative reason for making a stake in LQMT, while waiting for LQMT to serve you the steaks in return.
Do your own DD. Only invest what you can afford to lose and don’t expect anything in return and you will never be disappointed.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
LQMT could get a big bump up next month and going into August.
seems to me you have good common sense and experience therefore I will give you a follow. The posts on this ticker are much more professional... like the days of old.
Volume ticked up. Still anemic but if it holds it could get interesting real soon. Yet the stock price percentage increased more yesterday on 3 times less volume.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
You mind sharing those plans LI shared with you back in 2020?
You know the ones he privately emailed.
Tic tic tic tic tic tic.
I don’t think so. You know why? Because those emails don’t exist. Imo.
You can’t boast anymore about your hype or your predictions or your timing of buying shares in LQMT. You know why? You have been wrong again and again.
Remember boasting in your posts, the LQMT train left the train station. You want to tell everyone just where the hell did it go? You can’t because it never left the metaphoric junkyard.
Remember boasting LQMT will never go below a dime again? Take a look. You have been factually wrong again and again and again etc.
Imo, based on your posts your words your ridiculing others here with opinions diverse from yours, you have little to no integrity. That’s just my opinion.
Of course you can regain the integrity by simply posting one of those very serious emails with Lugee’s plans you talk about in post 190191.
4 years ago and not one shred of proof.
I’m a serious investor you can share them with me. I won’t disclose any of it.
Lugee Li, communicated to everyone by 8K and a PR, when he stepped down. Get your facts straight. That is all you do is wine and threaten posters. Copy other posters posts and paste them. Pointing out the facts are not slander. You have been asked by other posters to post the first email you claimed to have received when you boasted of buying stock in LQMT. You never ever have posted that one email from the former CEO Lugee Li.
I could go on and on about your other posts never focused on LQMT but threatening others on this board. Good for you. You emailed TC. Who cares. Good for you you emailed lugee Li.
The doubt was and is always your claim to buy shares in LQMT during the time you first bought shares in LQMT. Your words not anyone else’s. Then you brag about it and claim you are a serious investor. You even stated lugee Li only communicates with serious investors in replying to another poster. Your words.
You have mocked and ridiculed others for not knowing when to buy shares. Claiming you were always in the green and by that you boast more knowledge of timing when was the right time to buy a stock.
Well sunshine from what I can see you are not in the green anymore and haven’t been for a long long time. So much for your hindsight.
There is no slander here. There is though difference of opinions. So here is another opinion. Grow up and stop trying to bully everyone you disagree with.
Post your original email from Lugee Li. When you first posted of it. I could care less if you emailed him a hundred times afterwards. Imo, you have very little integrity based on your posts and accuracy of which way LQMT has gone.
Remember your posts of the LQMT train leaving the station? Well where the hell did it go when it left?
Slander no, not slander. Your tenacity for being wrong about LQMT and disagreeing with those you disagree with or who have been correct about LQMT in their opinions is really what is laughable.
Are we at 20 cents yet? Or are we below a dime?
This is what twenty cents looks like on a ticker 0.20, this is where we have been under a dime for quite some time 0.10. And right now as predicted we are in the nickels headed south if LQMT’s fundamentals continues unchanged.
I think your problem is that you don’t get that all who are sane and are invested in LQMT are serious investors and all want LQMT to succeed regardless of their opinions. You don’t get imo, that everyone here has a right to disagree with yours.
And one more fact. I have posted it before. Anyone who owns a share in LQMT is a serious investor, whether you email LQMT or not! PERIOD!
Yes I have directly communicated my questions, and concerns to Lugee Li and Tony Chung, apperantly unlike you. If that makes me a serious investor in comparison so be it.
And yes before Li stepped down as CEO he communicated back to me on several occasions.
As far as your accusations of receiving insider information and buying more shares based on it, that is both a lie and slander of another board member.
I hope you have a golden umbrella insurance policy to cover yourself if you are going to go around slandering people on social media.
I hold this stock long and strong still believing in the technology.
Good luck to all true longs.
You can’t discourage someone in their mid 80’s…..my comments to TC were more along the lines of potential domestic manufacturing partners and possible topics appropriate for the conference call. All constructive input.
It seems that shared observations and suggestions haven’t improved the share price. Perhaps a complaint or two might be warranted.
Only a serious investor who receives emails from the former CEO and present COB, Lugee Li can receive insider information.
Now that defines a serious investor who claims to have bought shares based on direct contact with Lugee Li. Then bought more at higher prices and is constantly LHAOF.
You just can’t make this BS up. As I posted recently, Einstein’s definition of a genius & an ignoramus. A Genius knows there are limitations.
I’m happy for you.
What is odd is your mentioning at all, “insider information.”
What is even more odd is the fact that you mentioned “not to complain.”
IMO, only an ignoramus would email or call or suggest contacting LQMT to complain.
Followers
|
890
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
232838
|
Created
|
04/30/05
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators PatentGuy1 Almosthere |
Liquidmetal® Technologies (ISO 9001:2008 certified) is a leading force in the research, development and commercialization of amorphous metals. Our revolutionary class of patented alloys and processes form the basis of high performance materials in a broad range of medical, military, consumer, industrial, and sporting goods products.
Discovered by researchers at the California Institute of Technology, Liquidmetal alloys’ unique atomic structure enables applications to achieve performance and accuracy levels that have not been possible before. The revolutionary class of patented materials technology redefine performance and design paradigms institutionalized by traditional materials.
As Liquidmetal Technologies controls the intellectual property rights with more than 70 U.S. patents, these high performance materials are dramatically changing the way companies develop new products.
LINKS
Featured: Automotive Pressure Sensors, 9.36 billion market by 2020
1. LiquidMetal Website
2. LiquidMetal Manufacturing Facility
3. OTC Market Report
4. Engel Liquidmetal Forum (Nov 2015)
5. ENGEL Symposium 2015
6. ENGEL Interview on Liquidmetal
PATENTS (USPTO)
1. Search Crucible Intellectual (Apple and LiquidMetal R&D)
2. Search Apple and LiquidMetal
3. Search Cross-license Patents w/Eontec
4. Search Vitreloy
5. Search Pre-grant Patents
VIDEOS
1. OMEGA Liquidmetal Bezel
2. ENGEL e-motion 110T
3. Liquidmetal Bouncing Ball
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Professor Lugee Li, Chairman
Professor Li was appointed as a member of our board of directors in March 2016 and became Chairman of our board of directors in October 2016. Professor Li is the founder, Chairman, and majority stockholder of DongGuan Eontec Co. Ltd., a Hong Kong company listed on the Shenzen Stock Exchange engaged in the production of precision die-cast products and the research and development of new materials. Professor Li founded Eontec in 1993 and has served as Chairman since that date. At Eontec, Professor Li is responsible for strategic development and research and development. Professor Li is also the founder and sole shareholder of Leader Biomedical Limited, a Hong Kong company engaged in the supply of biomaterials and surgical implants. Professor Li serves as an analyst for the Institute of Metal Research at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and serves part-time as a professor at several universities in China.
Abdi Mahamedi, Vice Chairman
Abdi Mahamedi has served on our board of directors since May 2009 and became Vice-Chairman of our board of directors in October 2016. Since 1987, Mr. Mahamedi has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Carlyle Development Group of Companies (“CDG”), which develops and manages residential and commercial properties in the United States on behalf of investors worldwide. At CDG, Mr. Mahamedi evaluates and supervises all of the investment activities and management personnel. Prior to joining CDG, Mr. Mahamedi founded Emanuel Land Company, a subsidiary of Emanuel & Company, a Wall Street investment banking firm, and served as a managing director for Emanuel Land Company from 1986 to 1987. In 1983, Mr. Mahamedi received his B.S.E. degree in Civil and Structural Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania, and in 1984 he received his M.S.E. degree in Civil and Structural Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania.
Isaac Bresnick
Currently serves as Legal and Regulatory Affairs Director for the Leader Biomedical Group, a private company based in Hong Kong and operating from Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and has served in that role since October 2014. At Leader Biomedical, Mr. Bresnick is responsible for the direction and management of legal affairs, regulatory affairs, quality control, and quality assurance, as well as for advising executive management of Group companies. Mr. Bresnick also currently serves as Director of AAP Joints GmbH, a private company in Berlin, Germany, and has served in that role since July 2013. Mr. Bresnick received his J.D. from the University of Connecticut School of Law in 2013, and his B.S. in Industrial Design from the University of Bridgeport in 2008. After completion of his undergraduate studies and continuing through his enrollment at UCONN Law, Mr. Bresnick worked as Senior Arrangements Designer for Electric Boat Corporation, a subsidiary of General Dynamics, from June 2008 to December 2012.
Vincent Carrubba
An experienced corporate leader and serial entrepreneur with extensive senior executive, technical and manufacturing experience. Mr. Carrubba has created and guided new products to success in the consumer goods, electronics, automotive and construction industries and has conceptualized, financed and built factories and developed new manufacturing technologies throughout Asia. From September 2014 through the present, Mr. Carrubba has served as the CEO of Admiral Composite Technologies Inc. (“Admiral”), where he has developed new technologies for environmentally responsible and innovative building materials which represent Admiral’s product lines. Mr. Carrubba has also served as Admiral’s Chairman since its inception in 2009. From September 2014 through the present, Mr. Carrubba has served as the CEO of Asia Sourcing & Communications USA Inc. and he has served as its Chairman since its inception in 2013. From 2002 through August 2014, Mr. Carrubba served as the Director of R&D for Interdynamics Inc., IDQ Holdings, where he was responsible for all R&D and QC matters, including the management of engineering, legal, patenting, regulatory, insurance and consumer relations matters. From 1989 through 1992, Mr. Carrubba designed and installed the New York Stock Exchange telecommunications and information technology systems. Mr. Carrubba has held engineering and executive positions with Xerox, General Electric, Bristol-Meyers Squibb and AT&T and he is the inventor of several patents related to telecommunications, professional tools and consumer products. Mr. Carrubba received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Engineering Science and a Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Columbia University SEAS in 1982.
Tony Chung
Mr. Chung was appointed to our board of directors in August 2017. Mr. Chung had previously served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer from December 2008. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Chung served as CFO at BETEK Corporation, a real estate and investment subsidiary of SK Engineering and Construction, and as CFO of Solarcity, a company providing advanced solar technology and installation services. Mr. Chung is a Certified Public Accountant and served eight years at KPMG as an Audit and Consulting Manager for several large multinational companies. He received his B.S. degree in Business Administration from the University of California, Berkeley. Mr. Chung is also an Attorney at Law and received his J.D. degree from Pacific Coast University School of Law.
Reporting Status | U.S. Reporting: SEC Reporting |
Audited Financials | Audited |
Latest Report | August 4, 2020 10Q |
CIK | 0001141240 |
Fiscal Year End | 12/31 |
OTC Marketplace | OTCQB |
Market Value1 | $129,851,894 | a/o Sep 24, 2020 | |
Authorized Shares | 1,100,000,000 | a/o Dec 31, 2016 | |
Outstanding Shares | 914,449,957 | a/o Sep 24, 2020 | |
-Restricted | Not Available | ||
-Unrestricted | Not Available | ||
Held at DTC | Not Available | ||
Float | 487,690,350 | a/o Dec 31, 2017 | |
Par Value | No Par Value |
Shareholders of Record | 217 | a/o Dec 31, 2017 |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |