Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Makes sense. But I don’t think they (Yihao)will be permitted to fulfill any government contract for Amorphology. My thinking is LQMT will collect fees off of Amorphology’s use of LQMT’s IP.
I just don’t understand the statement from LQMT that they gain a local US manufacturing source, unless LQMT has some purposeful use of Amorphology Inc.’s US manufacturing partner. Especially as you point out they don’t have a great deal of their own manufacturing capacity.
This is what happens when there is no Q. And A.
Or an investor relations person to answer the phone.
I gather from what LQMT is trying to do is to commercialize Liquidmetal. What I don’t gather is what you also point out which I believe everyone else understands they lack marketing expertise since most long term shareholders could still see without eye glasses. Why have they not contracted with a known successful marketer is beyond me.
It would be easier for them to prototype an existing ball point pen from a well known existing company. Take it to them and let them market the pen as a lifetime Liquidmetal pen. Guaranteed not to Break, fail, dent, scratch resistant etc. All the consumer would have to do is buy the refills. They could come monogrammed or mass produced for companies as well. Would save a lot in consumption of natural resources as well. After costs a nickel a pen X 10 million pens = $500,000.00.
Amorphology doesn’t have a whole lot of Manufacturing capacity or manpower. I’m thinking they have one Engle machine similar to the one we have mothballed in Arizona. I originally floated the idea that perhaps Amorphology approached LiquidMetal rather than vice versa. It could also be that Amorphology is looking for an entry point to access Yihao’s capacity. Both companies face the same hurdles as they try to figure a way get successful. You could merge Amorphology with LiquidMetal with Glasimetal and you would still have no real manufacturing capacity. They are clones sharing all the same weaknesses. These are research stage companies with no expertise in manufacturing or marketing.
Every once in a while even a blind squirrel finds a nut…..or a small application.
I would have preferred that they hook up with “Form Technology” to piggyback on their marketing expertise and reputation.
Recently this month LQMT inked an amended license agreement with Amorphology Inc. in the commentary LQMT states it gives LQMT a local US manufacturing source.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/liquidmetal-technologies-amorphology-inc-enter-210900519.html
Now that sounds great. BUT, there is always a but! Does anyone know what capacity of there own does Amorphology Inc. have to manufacture. They do have an outside source but I’m not sure if they manufacture high volume orders on their own.
Anyone?
So just to get it straight. Like when a customer goes to LQMT for a part to be manufactured. LQMT goes to yihao abroad. Now when LQMT needs a part to be manufactured they go to Amorphology Inc., and Amorphology Inc. goes to blah blah blah to get it manufactured. Do I have this right?
All opinions are welcome.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Ring company recently hits new SP low. if nothing else, perhaps a second quarter company anticipated FDA approval could spike the share price up and hopefully the company can get their act together to solve their own internal issues for anyone who bought shares. I do not own shares in the company. They came out with a slew of PR’s enticed interested buyers, then Crickets.
What gives? Can’t they just state in a PR for those who own shares they are working on solving whatever the issues are?
Was it a production problem, a software problem, or a lawsuit? Are people who ordered still waiting? Are they getting a refund or a discount for the delay? Not a good way in my opinion of doing business or getting new dice rollers at this point to roll.
Other than altering the picture on the LQMT website, LQMT, remains silent as they normally do not comment. At any rate any monies received by LQMT as stated in the 10K from the ring company is a good thing.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
I can tell you from experience you come here just being born and you act like you know it all already.
Sounds like a newly born Sykes graduate. Hope you make your money back.
LMAO, ok. Were you just born again?
These guys do. The company in question di nothing more than receive permission to play with them. :P "Nobody adds a mgf. facility to let it remain idle."
I can tell you from a lot of experience these guys are full of it and nothing will change.
It does seem the world is on the verge of many new products. This would make it more likely that LM will be making it's way on the scene more and more real shortly.
Masimo reels in FDA nod for pulse oximetry smartwatch amid Apple Watch patent spats
The split is slated to place a number of FDA-cleared medical devices squarely within a consumer-focused tech company built off of Masimo’s long history with sensors and patient data platforms.
Its Stork infant monitor—with its wearable, vital sign-tracking baby boot, digital camera and alerting app—received the agency’s green light last December. The device measures blood oxygen levels, pulse rate and skin temperature and can notify caregivers when the child turns over and begins sleeping facedown.
Last year also saw Masimo claim an FDA nod for its W1 smartwatch, with the agency clearing it for monitoring patients remotely whether they’re in hospitals, long-term care facilities or their homes.
The pulse-ox-equipped watch made its debut in the middle of a so-far-successful patent battle with Apple and its Apple Watch, which saw sensor-laden models fall subject to an import ban earlier this year. Apple began selling pulse-ox-free versions of its wearable in January.
What about Samsung's Galaxy Ring coming out as early as May or so?
" I can tell you this is a stepping stone for Samsung, and we're witnessing an evolution of its health-based devices.'
A couple new flip phones are coming out too.
Other companies like Honor are also introducing a health ring. So right now they will be used to monitor sleep. And then there is the Oura Ring.
Is there a LM application here?
Don't remind me!! Oh that hurts.
Not to get off of the subject of LQMT but as a result of the propaganda believed by weak minded people believing in the repeated lies as the truth, an estimated 55 million to 75 million people lost their lives needlessly and horribly in a war, according to the data from the following link.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World_War_II_Casualties.svg
The quote was used as a metaphor to all who misinterpret the truth as a lie and a lie as the truth.
It’s the same propaganda being used today in an attempt to destroy a candidate for President no matter what your political beliefs are. It’s not about quoting Nazi’s or quoting communists. It’s not about the left or the right or anywhere in between. Propaganda is propaganda no matter when it is used or whoever uses it to distort the truth. It’s not a narrow focus as you state in your post. It’s not exclusive to any political party. It even shows up many times on this LQMT board.
It’s a fact and that is not a lie.
And yes LQMT needs a good contract and modest contracts until we get there would not hurt either.
“In the meantime hype and pumping is a good thing in the absence of the real thing if it moves the share price up another 37%.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.”
Sure sounds to me like someone is crying hype!!!
So, now we are quoting Nazi’s that a lie told enough becomes the truth. A lie is always a lie, no matter how many weak minded sellers buy in. The truth always comes out, no matter how many communists are talking. Not calling anyone a communist on this site. We just need one good contact that produces revenue and some good news from TC. Get it done boys, it is time.
Many times a reply is not fully read or the question accurately remembered.
So here goes…
The question was an innuendo or a direct thought or accusation of when I post about the share price it always moves up on hype, but when the share price moves down it is always based on reality.
I guess many never read the bottom paragraph in the same reply:
Monday, 03/25/2024 7:27:00 PM
“It’s not that the share price moves up on hype or down on reality. It’s that there are no real revenue growing contracts in reality to move and sustain an increase in the share price for over a decade now.”
Never do I state the recent climb up is on hype.
In fact in a recent post I pointed this out:
“Monday, 03/25/2024 2:02:05 PM
Looks right now like a good shot to close above 0.08 cents this week”
And then there is this:
“Monday, 03/25/2024 12:18:31 PM
In essence the same volumes that have walked the share price down for factual reasons are the same volumes walking it back up for the same potential and expected ones that occur almost every year. Prior to November 2023 there were no news announcements from LQMT to inspire an increase or interest in the stock”
“In the meantime hype and pumping is a good thing in the absence of the real thing if it moves the share price up another 37%.”
Nowhere do I state the move up 37% from November is based on hype! In fact, this is what I posted!
Monday, 03/25/2024 11:44:17 AM
“There is a slight increase based on expectations from an actual insider purchase,10K, 8K and CC. Excluding the purchase. The rest are filled with forward worded commentary from the CEO.
Since the ceo purchase 4 months ago and the subsequent PR’s, the share price has gone up approximately 37%.”
All of these recent posts of upside I attribute beginning with the insider purchase and the recent CC, 10k and 8K PR’s coupled with the increase in potential and expectations from these events and forward worded commentary. Not once do I attribute the recent increase these past two weeks to any hype.
The mistake is believing in the question from the poster that I replied to.
The error was I only state reality when the share price moves down and hype when it moves up.
And the bigger mistake is when others believe the lie or error too, and chime in.
Never follow the crowd. Follow the facts.
Take a page out of history and learn a lesson many still have not learned yet….
““Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth”, “ A lie told once remains a lie but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth“
is a law of propaganda often attributed to the Nazi Joseph Goebbels.”
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
In fact in my weekly posts I state the share price moving up or down means nothing for it is on very little trading volumes. People see what they want to see and not always what is there.
Exactly 'Theresoon'.... They know how to do the 'twist and shout'... that is for sure...
Almost,
I agree.
Look to DJT for a prime example of hype and a stock price!!
IMHO - Tomcat
The problem with your thesis is there is no hype. Nobody is hyping anywhere. The stock price has risen based on level headed news.
Amazing how as soon as the share price rises the arguments from those who like to report downward trends is the stock is being hyped.
Read my lips: NO ONE IS HYPING. Hype doesn’t work for this stock anymore.
Must be really frustrating for the rinse and repeaters!
Chip,
Ripple will keep you entertained for a few hours, with a splitting headache after.
LQMT shares will keep you entertained for decades, perhaps a lifetime!
IMHO - Tomcat
Speaking of Ripple….I remember $0.65 for a bottle in the 60’s. equivalent to 10 shares of LQMT….WOW!
Keep your sense of humor!
So I can be an “insider” if my wife’s cousin lived next door to a LiquidMetal employee and picked up a rumor? Martha Stewart all over again. How would ResearchFYI identify an insider if there were one? The volume today was 3x average…How many were insiders? Is JB an insider or an outsider??
An insider doesn’t have to jump in and buy 10 million shares as a lump….it could be someone who picked up 500k over 3 days and hardly made a ripple.
Insider trading is not limited to employees on the payroll.
I concur: those forward looking statements were boilerplate. It's a shame you have such a vendetta against this company FYI;
wonderful excuse to distort the truth time and again. Get some therapy, man!
I agree with and understand your sentiment, but I do disagree with your characterization of forward looking statements on CCs. From my experience, the forward looking statements warning sounds like the generic, boilerplate warnings that I have heard from multiple other companies.
How can you have significant insider trading with 7 employees? …..virtually 100% are subject “insider” rules.
Why is it always hype? Because the share price doesn’t move up long term and is based on speculation not on the realities of LQMT’s actual reported 10Q’s and 10K’s year after year. But rather on unfounded speculation and rumors in which commentary and facts get stretched beyond Kansas and into the land of Oz.
One is wishful thinking which doesn’t sustain the share price on actual contracts and increasing revenues vs. what LQMT expects to do.
It’s why you hear LQMT on the CC call and 8K commentary to refer to the actual 10k and warn everyone repeatedly about forward worded commentary.
Reality is what you see every trading day. Anemic volumes interest and liquidity. Reality shows the fundamentals have not changed, nor sustained revenue increases.
It’s not that the share price moves up on hype or down on reality. It’s that there are no real revenue growing contracts in reality to move and sustain an increase in the share price for over a decade now.
Looks right now like a good shot to close above 0.08 cents this week.
Research,
Why is it always Hype when the stock price rises, and Reality when it falls!!?
Tomcat
In essence the same volumes that have walked the share price down for factual reasons are the same volumes walking it back up for the same potential and expected ones that occur almost every year. Prior to November 2023 there were no news announcements from LQMT to inspire an increase or interest in the stock.
There was some hype from around the www, which never pans out. Even the ring which was talked and bantered about daily has been put on the back burner.
Time will tell if they too can get there act together coupled with announcements of two more contracts would create another perfect storm to rocket up the share price and bring LQMT closer to an actual high volume contract and not a hyped expected one.
In the meantime hype and pumping is a good thing in the absence of the real thing if it moves the share price up another 37%.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Research,
The trend in LQMT stock price means nothing - until it does!
Tomcat
LQMT YOY up 15%. Nothing is happening.
Both the trading volumes, liquidity and interest have remained anemic throughout no matter what is taking place with the share price up or down.
There is a slight increase based on expectations from an actual insider purchase,10K, 8K and CC. Excluding the purchase. The rest are filled with forward worded commentary from the CEO.
Since the ceo purchase 4 months ago and the subsequent PR’s, the share price has gone up approximately 37%.
No actual contracts have been announced in over two years going into 27 months.
Research,
I HOPE so!!
Tomcat
Tomcat. It looks like some are starting to believe in the potential of this company and stock again!
It looks like this could be in for a real breakout!!
I expect to hear of contracts anytime this year and then we see this fly!
Not with this volume.
Nice to see buying more than selling. That’s all it takes to inch back to 0.09 and a dime.
Hamstrung from Apple and political ramifications have been a couple major factors that have kept this at bay I do believe.
It would appear those problems and others have been or in process of being rectified. The feelings of past jubilation are reawakening.
Sometimes it just takes some things longer than others to catch it's wind. I get the feeling this time is different. Time will tell.
Meanwhile I will buy a little more even at this level just in case. I have been cautious for a while thank goodness. At some point
one needs to pull the string. As someone else has said, it is better to do something and risk the loss than to do nothing and watch
it fly.
Yes, that would be. Ball bearings as well perhaps? The engineering applications are too numerous.
Somebody knows something??
Tomcat
Built Prototypes, get Products out there, make Partnerships, Show and Tell to Whales...
The 'Whales' with huge buying potential are in control and they are calling ALL of the shots right now ..... but once ONE or TWO of them begins large scale rollouts with a thumbs up ..... you can be certain the tide will shift VERY QUICKLY and the suppliers will then be in control for a good while ...... and lots of customers will be hopping aboard and trying to fight their way to the 'Ordering Window' ...
"...from your lips to God's ears..."
I certainly hope this is the case.
Really? >>"It is rather strange how a company can claim they need domestic manufacturing one year and not another year and then go back to claiming they need domestic manufacturing again. This happened three times if anyone is counting. You just don't know which executive is talking. Will the real TC stand up please." << It is not the least bit strange if you understand the pioneering process. Suppliers are not in control right now.... The 'Whales' with huge buying potential are in control and they are calling ALL of the shots right now ..... but once ONE or TWO of them begins large scale rollouts with a thumbs up ..... you can be certain the tide will shift VERY QUICKLY and the suppliers will then be in control for a good while ...... and lots of customers will be hopping aboard and trying to fight their way to the 'Ordering Window' ...
Another week passes and LQMT’s share price is up 15.472% from 0.05998 cents to 0.06926 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.
LQMT held a year end conference call Tuesday March 12, 2024.
LQMT is now into its 27th month without a new product order announcement, No new contracts for the order of parts.
On March 19th LQMT filed an 8k to amend a previous agreement using forward worded language that this would move LQMT closer to obtaining a high-volume contract. Personally, I thought that was the reason for touting the Yihao partnership about five years ago. You know 40 machines growing to 99 machines and so on and son. Five years later and dust, no high-volume part orders.
This is the first 8K filed by LQMT since JAN. 12, 2022.
Both the CC, the 10K and the 8K have raised the share price about 32%. IMO, the PR's should have doubled the share price and raised it 100%.
Let hope that past history is not an indication of future results as in the last 8K from over two years ago.
As I stated last week, Progress? Up to anyone’s interpretation of the CC. If one just relies heavily on forward worded expectations. (Not always a good idea.)
It is going to take the rest of the year to see if the little new interest in the stock has legs. Obviously, those with higher sights are looking for more than just forward worded well meaning expectations before they roll the dice and are willing to wait and pay a higher price. Otherwise, the volumes would be trading about 1% to 2% daily. Years ago, that would have happened based on expectations and hype and no contracts.
It is rather strange how a company can claim they need domestic manufacturing one year and not another year and then go back to claiming they need domestic manufacturing again. This happened three times if anyone is counting. You just don't know which executive is talking. Will the real TC stand up please.
I always thought for certain contracts and certain companies in lieu of the existing global babies not being always able to get along, that LQMT definitely would need a domestic partner to manufacture high volume orders and lesser ones as well. I do not doubt the timeliness for the amendment. There appears to be confidence in the manner of which TC spoke during the CC.
Shareholders have paid LQMT hundreds of thousands of dollars. The time to see potential for a real return on those investments are long overdue. The time for all of the expectations to bear fruit should begin this year.
Perhaps in 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2024, all in it will be very thankful and glad that they did.
Will this be the year revenues increase consistently? The 2nd, 3D, and 4th Q’s will tell. I’ll be pleasantly surprised if the 1st 10Q tics up.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC LUCK.
LQMT, please try not to play kick the can again it didn’t end well for 2023.”
Remember, without new revenues increasing quarterly and without progress due to cost of operations the share price is not averse to heading south again as stated in many of my posts. Fundamentals have not changed! cash burn is ongoing. No one bought the stock for rent revenue or market appreciation.
So far LQMT has done well to keep the stock from falling below 0.04 cents. They cannot let up now!
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
As for me, until it happens, (the annual expectations call,) it’s nothing more than a rosy outlook of the game Kick the Can. Same for another partnership old or new. After 2017, my days of wishful thinking and hype are over.
Let the 10K be your guide and any new 8K of increasing revenues be the proof of TC’s integrity along with the fruition of his comments be LQMT’s success this year and for years to come.
If I didn't already have a full position in LQMT shares, I definitely would be buying shares now!!
I am tempted to buy more anyway!
IMHO - Tomcat
I would like to see LQMT revisit the “tire pressure sensor” opportunity…..there have to be areas ripe for improvement that perhaps we can address. I’d like to see a few hundred sets as a test to get qualified.
Corrosion resistance a possible “in”.
I agree but I also am thinking beyond NASA. Many small accounts would suit me fine until a big one comes. There is danger with all the eggs in one basket.
Yeah but it’s a small pre-existing operation. It’s plausible NASA (not known for buying millions of parts) wants 15 bmg gears for a rover that will launch in 2032. I don’t smell a big contract coming because of Amorphology. Don’t they have like 1 Engle machine?
No brainer. After the addition of the domestic mgf. most likely they have other announcements coming fairly soon. Nobody adds a mgf. facility to let it remain idle.
Get on board, baby! It's happening. Just call me: DISCOVERY FYI
ALMOST THERE knows from whence he speaks!
Volume picking up rapidly......
Followers
|
885
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
7
|
Posts (Total)
|
233421
|
Created
|
04/30/05
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators PatentGuy1 Almosthere |
Liquidmetal® Technologies (ISO 9001:2008 certified) is a leading force in the research, development and commercialization of amorphous metals. Our revolutionary class of patented alloys and processes form the basis of high performance materials in a broad range of medical, military, consumer, industrial, and sporting goods products.
Discovered by researchers at the California Institute of Technology, Liquidmetal alloys’ unique atomic structure enables applications to achieve performance and accuracy levels that have not been possible before. The revolutionary class of patented materials technology redefine performance and design paradigms institutionalized by traditional materials.
As Liquidmetal Technologies controls the intellectual property rights with more than 70 U.S. patents, these high performance materials are dramatically changing the way companies develop new products.
LINKS
Featured: Automotive Pressure Sensors, 9.36 billion market by 2020
1. LiquidMetal Website
2. LiquidMetal Manufacturing Facility
3. OTC Market Report
4. Engel Liquidmetal Forum (Nov 2015)
5. ENGEL Symposium 2015
6. ENGEL Interview on Liquidmetal
PATENTS (USPTO)
1. Search Crucible Intellectual (Apple and LiquidMetal R&D)
2. Search Apple and LiquidMetal
3. Search Cross-license Patents w/Eontec
4. Search Vitreloy
5. Search Pre-grant Patents
VIDEOS
1. OMEGA Liquidmetal Bezel
2. ENGEL e-motion 110T
3. Liquidmetal Bouncing Ball
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Professor Lugee Li, Chairman
Professor Li was appointed as a member of our board of directors in March 2016 and became Chairman of our board of directors in October 2016. Professor Li is the founder, Chairman, and majority stockholder of DongGuan Eontec Co. Ltd., a Hong Kong company listed on the Shenzen Stock Exchange engaged in the production of precision die-cast products and the research and development of new materials. Professor Li founded Eontec in 1993 and has served as Chairman since that date. At Eontec, Professor Li is responsible for strategic development and research and development. Professor Li is also the founder and sole shareholder of Leader Biomedical Limited, a Hong Kong company engaged in the supply of biomaterials and surgical implants. Professor Li serves as an analyst for the Institute of Metal Research at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and serves part-time as a professor at several universities in China.
Abdi Mahamedi, Vice Chairman
Abdi Mahamedi has served on our board of directors since May 2009 and became Vice-Chairman of our board of directors in October 2016. Since 1987, Mr. Mahamedi has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Carlyle Development Group of Companies (“CDG”), which develops and manages residential and commercial properties in the United States on behalf of investors worldwide. At CDG, Mr. Mahamedi evaluates and supervises all of the investment activities and management personnel. Prior to joining CDG, Mr. Mahamedi founded Emanuel Land Company, a subsidiary of Emanuel & Company, a Wall Street investment banking firm, and served as a managing director for Emanuel Land Company from 1986 to 1987. In 1983, Mr. Mahamedi received his B.S.E. degree in Civil and Structural Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania, and in 1984 he received his M.S.E. degree in Civil and Structural Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania.
Isaac Bresnick
Currently serves as Legal and Regulatory Affairs Director for the Leader Biomedical Group, a private company based in Hong Kong and operating from Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and has served in that role since October 2014. At Leader Biomedical, Mr. Bresnick is responsible for the direction and management of legal affairs, regulatory affairs, quality control, and quality assurance, as well as for advising executive management of Group companies. Mr. Bresnick also currently serves as Director of AAP Joints GmbH, a private company in Berlin, Germany, and has served in that role since July 2013. Mr. Bresnick received his J.D. from the University of Connecticut School of Law in 2013, and his B.S. in Industrial Design from the University of Bridgeport in 2008. After completion of his undergraduate studies and continuing through his enrollment at UCONN Law, Mr. Bresnick worked as Senior Arrangements Designer for Electric Boat Corporation, a subsidiary of General Dynamics, from June 2008 to December 2012.
Vincent Carrubba
An experienced corporate leader and serial entrepreneur with extensive senior executive, technical and manufacturing experience. Mr. Carrubba has created and guided new products to success in the consumer goods, electronics, automotive and construction industries and has conceptualized, financed and built factories and developed new manufacturing technologies throughout Asia. From September 2014 through the present, Mr. Carrubba has served as the CEO of Admiral Composite Technologies Inc. (“Admiral”), where he has developed new technologies for environmentally responsible and innovative building materials which represent Admiral’s product lines. Mr. Carrubba has also served as Admiral’s Chairman since its inception in 2009. From September 2014 through the present, Mr. Carrubba has served as the CEO of Asia Sourcing & Communications USA Inc. and he has served as its Chairman since its inception in 2013. From 2002 through August 2014, Mr. Carrubba served as the Director of R&D for Interdynamics Inc., IDQ Holdings, where he was responsible for all R&D and QC matters, including the management of engineering, legal, patenting, regulatory, insurance and consumer relations matters. From 1989 through 1992, Mr. Carrubba designed and installed the New York Stock Exchange telecommunications and information technology systems. Mr. Carrubba has held engineering and executive positions with Xerox, General Electric, Bristol-Meyers Squibb and AT&T and he is the inventor of several patents related to telecommunications, professional tools and consumer products. Mr. Carrubba received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Engineering Science and a Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Columbia University SEAS in 1982.
Tony Chung
Mr. Chung was appointed to our board of directors in August 2017. Mr. Chung had previously served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer from December 2008. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Chung served as CFO at BETEK Corporation, a real estate and investment subsidiary of SK Engineering and Construction, and as CFO of Solarcity, a company providing advanced solar technology and installation services. Mr. Chung is a Certified Public Accountant and served eight years at KPMG as an Audit and Consulting Manager for several large multinational companies. He received his B.S. degree in Business Administration from the University of California, Berkeley. Mr. Chung is also an Attorney at Law and received his J.D. degree from Pacific Coast University School of Law.
Reporting Status | U.S. Reporting: SEC Reporting |
Audited Financials | Audited |
Latest Report | August 4, 2020 10Q |
CIK | 0001141240 |
Fiscal Year End | 12/31 |
OTC Marketplace | OTCQB |
Market Value1 | $129,851,894 | a/o Sep 24, 2020 | |
Authorized Shares | 1,100,000,000 | a/o Dec 31, 2016 | |
Outstanding Shares | 914,449,957 | a/o Sep 24, 2020 | |
-Restricted | Not Available | ||
-Unrestricted | Not Available | ||
Held at DTC | Not Available | ||
Float | 487,690,350 | a/o Dec 31, 2017 | |
Par Value | No Par Value |
Shareholders of Record | 217 | a/o Dec 31, 2017 |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |