Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
THE HOTTEST INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING of 2010 could be General Motors. That's right. GM.
The auto maker, long synonymous with bloat and mismanagement, has undergone an impressive turnaround since it emerged from a brief stay in bankruptcy last year. GM still is no Honda or BMW, but it's probably in its best shape since its heyday in the 1960s. It operated at a narrow loss in the third quarter, and fourth-quarter results, due later this month, could show an operating profit.
Wall Street is excited because a competitive GM could be very profitable if the auto market turns up next year. Some of the good news: GM's U.S. market share is up, its costs are down, its vehicle incentives and inventories have declined, while its resale values have risen.
GM may go public in the second half of this year, and its stock-market value could top $50 billion, more than Ford's $40 billion or Daimler's $43 billion. A tarnished Toyota still is tops in the industry with a $127 billion market value.
JPMorgan credit analyst Eric Selle wrote in a client presentation last week that a public GM could have a market value of $63 billion. That could be aggressive, but $50 billion is a real possibility. After its near-death experience, GM finally has an excellent balance sheet, with $42 billion in cash at the end of the third quarter, against $29 billion in debt and preferred stock. This admittedly reflects Uncle Sam's largess in pumping $50 billion into GM in late 2008 and 2009, plus obligations the auto maker shed through its restructuring.
After seeking bankruptcy protection in June, GM emerged in July as a private company shorn of much of its debt and with four equity owners: The federal government turned most of a $50 billion loan into a 60.8% stake. The Canadian government received an 11.7% stake for putting $9 billion into GM, which has several assembly plants north of the border. The United Auto Workers union got a 17.5% interest for forgoing a $20 billion health-care claim against GM. The holders of $27 billion of GM's public debt, as well as other creditors, got a 10% equity stake, plus warrants for an additional 15% of the company.
[GM chart]
A $50 billion equity value for GM would be good news for U.S. taxpayers; Washington could recoup a big chunk of its $50 billion investment. The Treasury's 60% holding would be worth $26 billion. In addition, Uncle Sam holds $9 billion of GM debt and preferred shares. CEO Ed Whitacre has said that GM will repay the debt by June. The UAW is in the best position because it may get back 80% of its $20 billion in health-care claims via the GM equity stake, plus $9 billion of debt and preferred stock. Even if the debt rallies, bondholders will fare the worst, reflecting the politically motivated restructuring of GM by the Obama administration that favored the union over bondholders despite their similar legal claims. The union is also apt to do better than taxpayers, based on its sweet deal.
A 2010 IPO isn't a sure thing. Whitacre has been noncommittal about a date, but has said he'd like to see an IPO as soon as possible. The Obama administration is eager to begin exiting its investment in what some pundits call Government Motors. GM executives declined to speak to Barron's.
Investors can play GM via some $27 billion (face value) of debt of the old GM, which trades around 30 cents on the dollar and is due to be exchanged for a mix of stock and warrants in the new GM. These are no longer conventional bonds that pay interest and principal; they simply will give holders equity in the company.
The original bondholders have been hammered -- the debt traded at 95 cents on the dollar as recently as 2007 -- but prices have tripled from about 10 cents since before the bankruptcy filing as Wall Street has warmed to the company's story.
THE DEBT CARRIES OBVIOUS RISK, given the uncertain recovery value. Many institutional investors avoid such complex distress-debt situations. There are many other ways to play a revival in global auto markets that are much simpler than buying General Motors debt, including shares of Ford (ticker: F), Daimler (DAI), BMW (BMW.Germany) and Toyota (TM), whose stock is down 12% this year amid concern about the financial and sales impact of its highly publicized recalls. Ford, near 12, trades for 12 times projected 2010 profits. Daimler, whose shares are off 22% this year, to 42, offers a diversified international play on cars and trucks, including its marquee Mercedes-Benz franchise.
GM bond bulls, including analysts at JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley, have argued that the debt could rise to 40 cents on the dollar if the company's recovery plays out and equity investors gravitate toward the debt ahead of an IPO. Probably the best plays are GM's old convertible debt, including the 6.25% and 5.25% issues formerly listed under the tickers GPM and GBM. They trade for about $6.50 -- 26% of their $25 face value. These are less expensive than many other GM debt securities, like the 8[frac38]s of 2033, trading near 30 cents on the dollar.
Retail investors can buy GM debt, although some brokerages have rules that make it tough to do so because the issuer has gone through a bankruptcy. Information on GM debt prices can be found at www.investinginbonds.com, a Website that tracks over-the-counter bonds.
Investors probably should avoid GM's old equity, now trading around 55 cents a share under the name Motors Liquidation (MTLQQ). On its Website, Motors Liquidation expresses its "strong belief that there will be no value for the common stockholders in the bankruptcy liquidation process, even under the most optimistic of scenarios."
The bankruptcy filing, rather than ruining the company by scaring away car buyers, was a huge benefit because it let GM do things that critics said it should have done decades ago -- including closing about 40% of its U.S. dealerships, getting rid of most of its debt, culling its brands, reducing its workforce and rationalizing elements of its UAW relationship.
Car buyers are back in GM showrooms, thanks to some hot models -- Toyota's troubles also might be helping. The American company's domestic market share hit 21% in January, up from 19% a year earlier, in part aided by sales to rental-car companies.
GM's winners include the new Chevrolet Camaro, which is besting Ford's Mustang and selling for around $35,000 without any financial incentives. Sales of Cadillac's new $40,000 SRX sport-utility vehicle were up 200% in January relative to January 2009, and it's now No.2 in a competitive category behind only the Lexus RX 350. GM is the market leader in crossover vehicles with the Chevy Equinox and GMC Terrain. Even once-dowdy Buick has a strong seller in the sleek new LaCrosse, which is holding its own against entry-level Lexus and Acura sedans. GM also remains a leader in full-size pickups and SUVs.
The Camaro reflects GM's renewed focus on engineering. Its standard engine is the 304-horsepower direct-injection V-6 from the Cadillac CTS. Mated to a standard six-speed manual transmission, the car gets almost 30 miles a gallon in highway driving. The $40,000 CTS, meanwhile, rivals the $50,000-plus BMW 5 series and has been named one of Car & Driver's top 10 vehicles three years in a row.
Under the hard-nosed, pragmatic Whitacre, a former AT&T CEO, the company is trying to maximize profits by matching production to demand. This might seem elementary, but for GM it's a breakthrough. Before its bankruptcy, it often overproduced, leaving its dealers with unwanted cars that could be sold only with the help of incentives, which topped $5,000 per vehicle in late 2008. The aim back then was to keep plants running and unionized workers on factory lines, rather than drawing pay while idle in the company's infamous "Jobs Bank." The practice tarnished GM's brands and their resale values. GM's incentives in January were under $3,200. That was still $500 higher than the industry average, but the numbers are moving in the right direction.
GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz recently told Crain's Automotive News that several GM models, such as the Terrain and even the large Chevrolet Tahoe SUV, are in short supply, adding the "scary thing" that if industry sales pick up, its market share might fall because "we can't supply" the vehicles. GM is running multiple shifts in certain plants rather than reopening some idle plants.
In the emerging markets, GM has a strong position, notably in China, where its joint ventures -- China doesn't let foreign auto outfits operate independently there -- control 15% of what has become the world's largest auto market. Buicks are a Chinese status symbol. And GM has more than 20% of the fast-growing Brazilian car market, plus good positions in India and Russia.
From July 10, when it emerged from bankruptcy, until Sept. 30, GM had an operating loss of $261 million, as North American losses of $651 million offset $390 million in international profits and other income. In contrast, Ford made $868 million, or 25 cents a share, in the fourth quarter. Yet GM has made great strides since 2008, when it lost $21 billion from operations.
Western Europe remains a problem for GM, which decided to keep its money-losing operations there after considering selling them. That unit's crown jewel, Opel, is a key small- and medium-car engineering source for its parent; the 2011 Buick Regal, available this spring, is derived from the Opel Insignia, named 2009 European Car of the Year by automotive journalists.
GM has done well in emerging markets, where it isn't burdened by onerous union contracts. And it finally has a competitive cost structure in its large North American operations, meaning that it should earn ample profits if depressed vehicle sales, now running at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 11 million, move up toward 14 million units by 2011. In the first nine months of 2009, GM slashed $6 billion in costs relative to its comparable 2008 stretch. GM cut its U.S. workforce 18% in that span, with its executive ranks declining by a third.
GM has wound down production of Pontiac and Saturn and sold Sweden's Saab. The sale of Hummer to a Chinese company fell through last week; the SUV maker will be shut down. GM now has four domestic brands: Chevy, Cadillac, Buick and GMC. This has produced engineering and marketing savings and concentrated GM's focus: it now has half the brands it once had.
GM's fourth-quarter results, due in March, are likely to show that it had about $34 billion in cash on Dec. 31, versus $42 billion on Sept. 30, in part because of scheduled payments, including for some $2.5 billion of borrowings to the U.S. and Canadian governments. Net cash could total about $8 billion -- the $34 billion minus $26 billion of debt and preferred. The company did have a sizable pension deficit -- $25 billion at year-end 2008 -- but that probably narrowed a lot during the stock market's 2009 rally.
GM issued 500 million shares to its four equity holders last July. If in-the-money warrants are included, the share count is about 590 million. How much are they worth?
Most analysts value the company based on projected 2011 pretax cash flow, which depends on factors such as projected global sales. New York-based Evercore Partners, which made financial projections in conjunction with GM's proposed reorganization last year, has assumed a base level of $10 billion of 2011 cash flow, versus an estimated $6.4 billion this year. Put a multiple of four on that, and GM is worth $40 billion.
But that doesn't include the value of its net cash, Chinese joint ventures, a 17% share of General Motors Acceptance Corp. and a stake in a restructured Delphi, the former GM auto-parts maker that emerged from bankruptcy last year. Combined, the value of these four assets could easily top $10 billion. The Chinese joint ventures earned $200 million in the third quarter, while the GMAC stake could be worth $3 billion, based on the finance company's book value. (GMAC itself plans to go public.) Add it all up and GM could have an equity value of $50 billion, or $85 a share ($50 billion divided by the 590 million existing shares).
The stock's value, in turn, affects that of the $27 billion of publicly traded debt.
Bondholders are entitled to 50 million shares, plus 45 million seven-year warrants struck at $30 a share and another 45 million 10-year warrants with a strike price of $55. At $85, the bondholders' 50 million shares would be worth $4.25 billion, and the warrants might be worth an added $4 billion, depending on how their time value is assessed. It's unclear how soon after an IPO the bondholders would get their shares and warrants from GM.
The GM debt is now worth about $8 billion: $27 billion face amount times 0.30 (for 30 cents on the dollar). JPMorgan analysts argue that the debt is attractive because GM's 2011 cash flow could easily top $11 billion in a stronger car market, given the company's vastly improved cost structure.
Barron's hasn't always been right on GM -- most notably we recommended buying the stock about a year before the company went bankrupt -- but this time the auto maker's dawn seems real.
Bottom line: GM is on the mend, thanks in large part to the bankruptcy that its former leaders had warned would destroy it -- and thanks, most of all, to the generosity of Uncle Sam.
http://online.barrons.com/article/SB126722854236252683.html#articleTabs_panel_article%3D1
MTLQ.GF hits 31.805 (1/12/10).
CCYPQ $6.80
+1.30 (23.64%)
Volume: 29,272
6.25 - 7.50
CCYPQ parity would be $7.95 (318.05/40) at that price.
CCYPQ still a buy up to $5.
Hopefully, this price will not be seen again. Although I would be a buyer again, I never want anyone to suffer from a price decline that would allow me buy back in.
I have removed CCYPQ as one of my Favorites based on it not following back to $5
Congrats! eom
Thanks JCPNY777. eom
maray the numbers you see are the cusip. if you go to http://www.quantumonline.com/ and enter the cusip. number it will tell you what each of the numbers symbols are
Verified.
Last: 6.50 Change: +1.75 | +36.84%
When I checked pricing after a busy day at work, I remembered placing some "auto pilot" order out of the money. Turns out I placed a GTC sell order at $6.50 on 1/20/10 when MTLQ.GF was trading between 26 and 26.50, which put parity from $6.50 to $6.625.
Once I checked my account, I learned I was the seller of 1060 units at $6.50 at 15:56. MTLQ.GF closed at 27. Parity is $6.75, so I sold at 96.3 percent.
Now left with only 440 units.
Can someone verify that $5.85 was hit?
iHub is limited when using an iPhone. :o-
I have a historical discount analysis going back until June 2009 which is far back as the trading data for the preferred goes. It is in graph format.
The average discount 45%. Current is 36%.
Doesn anyone know how to post an image?
I hold the GXM $6.00, but they are listed as numbers in my account. Can't trade them. I remember trying to sell them in favor of buying more CCYPQ when this was trading at $1.70.
How did you get all the quotes for those, especially to the actual symbols (instead of the numbers)?
Thanks in advance.
Enterprising Investor- why didnt you tell me about this earlier! I really like the idea.
As a point of reference, below is a list of the GM trust preferreds that are pari-pasu with subordinated debt along with a recent price:
GPM $6.16
GBM $6.00
GXM $6.00
GMW $6.02
XGM $5.58
GMS $5.90
BGM $5.95
HGM $6.20
RGM $5.90
CCYPQ still trades at a much greater discount. If you can get your hands on shares it is certainly a steal below $5.00. Very easy to short the bonds by the way- although bonds still trading at a discount to the potential IPO value of GM.
MTLQ.GF 2010 intra-day high-water mark 28.68 (1/12/10).
CCYPQ parity would be $7.17 (286.80/40) at that price.
The 2010 low is 25.25. Hopefully, we have seen the last of sub-25 MTLQ.GF trades. I would add to any CCYPQ position up to $5 (250/50), which would profit a margin of safety of at least 20 percent.
MTLQ.GF hits 26.50 (12/22/09).
CCYPQ parity is now $6.63 ($265/40).
MTLQ.GF hits 25.23, up 2.69 and...
and CCYPQ drops $.55 to $3.00? Parity is now $6.31 ($252.30/40)!
Where are all the smart people?
CCYPQ is thinly-traded/grey market.
I have no idea how many shares actually traded at $5.00.
It was hard for me to get my limited number of shares. My orders were out there for days at a time.
CCYPQ is up only slightly today. Can you explain the crazy move last week?
CCYPQ hits $5.00 intraday (12/10/09).
The underlying MTLQ.GF hit $23.312, which equates to about $5.83 in CCYPQ.
12/10/2009 3.50 5.00 3.50 3.52 12,050
http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/historical_quotes.aspx?symbol=CCYPQ&selected=CCYPQ
No brainer for me.
Thanks again for the lead. I would most likely have never found it on my own! My average cost is $1.83, so I am already up about 91 percent. I would only take early profits, if the discount went to five percent ($5.35) or so.
Glad to see some took my advice on CCYPQ. I know it took sometime, but this is a multi-bagger in the long run w/ the warrants being a bonus.
I know some are up about 100% or more and no need to take profits since this is not a fly-by night pink Sh!t. I am able to sleep at night w/o worrying about CCYPQ!!
CCYPQ closed at $3.50, up $.75 or 27.27 percent.
Volume was only 8,035.
The underlying security, MTLQ.GF, is consistently trading around 22.50 now. This equates to $5.50 per share of CCYPQ.
Not an easy question to answer.
MTLQ.GF closed at $20.80 today, which is equivilent to $5.20 per CCYPQ. CCYPQ ended at $2.91, which is a 44-percent discount. This is huge! Under arbitrage theory, investors would quickly pay $2.91 (or more until it approaches $5) sell MTLQ.GF short at $20.80 and lock in the profit. A 5 to 10 percent discount would be reasonable.
Based solely on discount play, I would pay $3.90 to $4.00. However, that is only half the story. For investors looking to make money on the IPO of New GM, MLLQ.GF represents a discount to the future distributions.
CCYPQ up 45 percent since your last buy on 11/19/09, but the volume seems light for such a move - only 12,950 shares.
11/20/2009 2000 2.5
11/23/2009 500 2.5
11/24/2009 5000 2.8
11/25/2009 350 2.75
11/27/2009 900 2.8
11/30/2009 1500 2.8
12/1/2009 1000 2.85
12/2/2009 1700 2.85
Can you provide with your buy limit?
Increased stake by 500 shares at $2.00.
Average cost now $1.83.
MTLQ.GF has broken through the 20 barrier.
Last trade 21.
CCYPQ equivalent $5.25 ($210/40). Remains undervalued.
Great going here. Sorry that I never could get any. Bid way over the last, [robab;y Schwab didn't even pass order to someone that could fill :{
GL
$2.05. Slowly but surely. That the way it should be for real investments!
MTLQ.GF GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION 8.10 06/15/2024 trading at $16.00
CCYPQ equivalent $4.00 ($160/40)
I believe only once before in June.
Reviewed FINRA data from today back to early June.
I had been thinking WAM and LEH as focus areas for new funds, but the near 50 percent discount from the underlying security, if it lasts, makes CCYPQ a "no brainer".
Wow, what happened? This is the first time I have seen this bond this high post BK.
I wonder if it has anything to do with this:
"(iv) Finally, if a chapter 11 plan is implemented as contemplated
under the structure of the Sale transaction, Old GM will own 10% of New
GM’s common stock on an undiluted basis. In addition, if the allowed
prepetition general unsecured claims against Old GM exceed $35 billion,
Old GM will be issued an additional 10 million shares, amounting to approximately 2% of New GM’s common stock. Old GM will also own the two warrants mentioned above."
The "two warrants mentioned above" portion:
"(v) two warrants, each to purchase 7.5% of the post-closing
outstanding shares of New GM, with an exercise price based on a $15
billion equity valuation and a $30 billion equity valuation, respectively"
http://www.nysb.uscourts.gov/opinions/reg/28_2967_opinion.pdf
MTLG.GF up 1.25 to 15 one trade (8/03/09)
Issue: MTLQ.GF Description: General Motors Corporation Coupon Rate: 8.100 Maturity Date: 06/15/2024
Execution
Date Time Status Quantity Price Yield Comm. Modifier 2nd Modifier Special As Of Reporting Party Side
08/03/2009 09:37:35 T 400000 15.000 0.000 N @ D
08/03/2009 09:37:00 W 400000 15.000 0.000 N Z D
08/03/2009 09:37:00 T 400000 15.000 0.000 N @ D
08/03/2009 09:36:56 T 400000 15.000 0.000 N @ D
CCYPQ equivalent $3.75 ($150/40)
More is better.
"Old GM" is probably used to differentiate from the "Motors Liquidation Company" (MTLLQ).
CCYPQ continues to provide a margin of safety for those interested in buying "Old GM" debt. GMGM.GF generally trades in a range that equates to $2.50 to $3 for CCYPQ.
Page 19.
"(iv) Finally, if a chapter 11 plan is implemented as contemplated
under the structure of the Sale transaction, Old GM will own 10% of New
GM’s common stock on an undiluted basis. In addition, if the allowed
prepetition general unsecured claims against Old GM exceed $35 billion,
Old GM will be issued an additional 10 million shares, amounting to approximately 2% of New GM’s common stock. Old GM will also own the two warrants mentioned above."
The "two warrants mentioned above" portion:
"(v) two warrants, each to purchase 7.5% of the post-closing
outstanding shares of New GM, with an exercise price based on a $15
billion equity valuation and a $30 billion equity valuation, respectively"
http://www.nysb.uscourts.gov/opinions/reg/28_2967_opinion.pdf
Looks like "we" are getting a little more of the new GM.
Also, "old GM" is the unsecured creditors, "us." I do not know why they call it the "old GM."
Still analyzing.
I still believe WAM is overvalued today relative to LEH.
WAMPQ is equivilent to 40 shares of WAMKQ. WAHUQ is higher up the priority list - basically a TOPrS with warrants that should trade like WM.IY.
The easiest thing for me to do is just add more CCYPQ.
Have you decided on what to buy? Just curious as to your choice. Thanks.
In case you do not know, Wamu debt consists of two (2) kinds.
Washington Mutual Inc debt and Washington Mutual Bank debt.
Washington Mutual Inc debt is the one that is trading at 80 plus cents on the dollar.
WAMPQ, yes, that is where the majority of my holding is out of all the wamu securities. I bought them when they were between $3 and $4.95. Sold most and rebought back in at $19 (it is trading at $17 right now) because:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=37274341
If you are just comparing WAMPQ and LEHPQ, I would go w/ WAMPQ. It is much closer to recovery than LEHPQ. WAMPQ "may" go lower, depending on what happens in court. Also, if you are into technical, WAMPQ has a gap at around $9.
If LEH stock (trust perferred) does fall to a price I cannot turn down, then I would not mind taking a "chance" before Alvraz reports their progress.
Just me opinion.
WAMPQ and LEHPQ seemed similar from the outside, but not the pricing. I just have not done much research on these two cases. Thanks for the insight.
I was thinking about WAMPQ a couple months ago. I did not pull the trigger, but have watched the price decline from near $30. Thus, the good reason for taking a second look.
The main reason for not buying relates to the potential negative impact on WaMu debt if JPM does not settle the case quickly. I set up a board for WaMu debt, but have failed to provide the community with much information. First up, is sorting the various issues by type.
Enterprise: Sorry no PM capabilities.
"WAMU preferred has evidence that they will have recovery. That is the difference between the two."
I was responding to someone comparing WAMPQ and LEHPQ. They are both very similar. Both $1,000 par value, both preferred, etc. LEHPQ was trading at $1'ish while WAMPQ was trading at $19'ish.
Wamu is not far from being paid a high percentage if not full par.
LEHPQ on the other hand, is VERY FAR OUT OF THE MONEY. It is NOT even close. Also, see post: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=39547420
As for the Trust preferreds (you referred to as TOPrS), it is possible, BUT two factors. 1. A long orderly wind down (which I think is possible so long as the (SENIOR) Creditors are willing to wait. 2. DERIVATIVES.
"Collection fom derivatives. Marsal said they collected $16bil of $27.1bil that they are owed from derivatives. This is only 1% of all derivatives and 99% have not been sorted out yet."
Derivatives is the make it or break it. Alvarez & Marsel has only unwound 1% of the derivatives and recovery approx. 50 plus % (according some on the board). I not into all the cheer leading since my money is involved. What people on the Board do not realize is that it can go either way. LEH can owe a counter party or LEH is owed from a counter party. The board thinks that all counter parties owe LEH.
During the creditors meeting, Alvarez & Marsel was quoted as saying they were "scared" of what derivatives needs to be unwound. There is a transcript somewhere.
As for Wamu, they have a more likely chance of having recovery all the way to common shareholders. I own no common though, only preferreds. Wamu debt is trading at 80 plus cents on the dollar. THAT IS VERY HIGH AS YOU KNOW. The Creditors are confident in recovery. To me, Wamu paper is too high, but since only conservative people like bonds, I would it is a good price for them. (The $4.4 billion, soon to be recovered, means Wamu paper is 100% paid off.)
During the entire BK process, Wamu and the creditors committee have been helping each other since the beginning, even in Court. There have been NO disputs between Wamu and its creditors.
All Wamu needs is to recovery the $4.4 billion. If they do, Wamu Trust preferreds are in the money. If Wamu gets their tax refunds, regular preferreds are in the money with a very high percentage. If Wamu recovers their trademark, copyright or patent suit, preferreds get full value and common has some recovery. Wamu is way ahead of the game.
The board consensus is that if JP Morgan goes through discovery, the more likely they will settle w/ Wamu.
Today, JP Morgan lost their motion for reconsideration regarding discovery which is huge.
Bottom line: Wamu is very transparent and chugging along. Lehman has many variables right now. Derivatives is the largest unknown. Lehman may take several years to unwind. I am waiting on more transparency.
Sorry for the rambling, I was trying to be as brief as possible.
The above is strictly my opinion.
Obviously we were all asleep.
Seriously, there is nothing to worry about - 225 shares is nothing. It is just that none of us had an existing buy order out there.
There is at least one out there now!
I get Nothing! Have a 1k bid in every day :(
Man, 11K traded. I am only getting partials. Anyone else getting partials, or is it just me?
Thanks in advance.
Impressive credentials! Thanks for Wilson's bio!
Harry Wilson is now called a "private investor".
He began at Goldman Sachs, moved over to Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, spent some time as a principal at The Blackstone Group and was a partner at Silver Point Capital. A pair of degrees from Harvard, including the sought after MBA.
"GM awaits its fate as closing arguments end
A ruling from the judge presiding over its bankruptcy case could be imminent as closing arguments conclude, with creditors pressing against automaker's plan.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Lawyers wrapped up their closing arguments in the GM bankruptcy case Thursday, opening the way for the judge to decide whether to approve or deny the sale of the automaker's assets to a "new GM."
GM's lead attorney, Harvey Miller of Weil Gotshal & Manges, urged Judge Robert Gerber to approve the sale of GM's assets, arguing that there was no other option besides liquidation. "No one objector has brought forth a viable alternative other than, 'your honor should deny the application,'" a scenario that he likened to "playing Russian roulette with the government."
Miller said, "in effect, the objectors are saying, 'If I can't get my pound of flesh, then let GM go down in flames.'"
With Thursday's proceedings ended and a long holiday weekend, decision from the presiding judge isn't expected until Monday.
The U.S. Treasury has imposed a July 10 deadline for approving the deal saying that it would otherwise walk away.
Miller dismissed suggestions by some objectors that the Treasury was bluffing. "As we stand here today, GM's market share is eroding," he said, noting also that the value of the assets would plunge in liquidation.
Thursday is the third day of hearings in bankruptcy court in New York in which representatives of GM's unsecured bondholders were able to present their arguments regarding the company's reorganization.
The representatives explained to the court that they shouldn't be left behind in GM's bankruptcy process, arguing that such a move is not legal.
Michael Richman, an attorney from the firm Patton Boggs representing a group of dissident bondholders addressed the judge about "the absence of real choice in the dominance of the government," referring to the U.S. Treasury's role in pushing the bankruptcy process forward.
He said that the Treasury, in imposing it's July 10 "drop dead deadline," was using a "my way or the highway" attitude in refusing to consider alternate means of restructuring.
He said the court should not rush to get the deal done by July 10. "Since filing Chapter 11 GM's assets are not wasting, not deteriorating and not melting," he argued.
Oliver Parker, who said he was representing himself as a bondholder, told the judge, " it is not [in] my interest, or [in] any bondholder's [interest] for GM to liquidate. All we want is a chance to negotiate with the government fairly."
David Jones, of the U.S. attorney's office representing the Federal government in this case said, "The government is not simply sacrificing principle for expediency, as we are accused of doing. We are using established law. The evidence is clear that the sale achieves the highest possible recovery for the assets being sold."
Jones reiterated that the government "has no intention of funding this deal" if a decision is not reached by July 10.
Much of the prior day's testimony was from Harry Wilson, a member of the auto team that is helping GM and the U.S. Treasury with the bankruptcy process.
Wilson, who has made a career out of investing in distressed firms, said the government has set a July 10 deadline for the restructuring plan to be completed.
"This business can not withstand a process of uncertain duration," Wilson said. "GM was far too large, too complex and too complicated to survive a [routine] Chapter 11 process."
Mark Salzberg, an attorney with Washington-based Patton Boggs, representing unsecured bondholders of GM, asked Wilson a series of questions about the reasoning behind leaving bondholders out of the bankruptcy process.
Wilson said that one of the "strategic benefits" of a 363 sale, in which the preferred assets of the old GM are transferred to the new GM, is that "consent of bondholders was not required."
Wilson said that there were other benefits, including "speed, certainty and the ability to leave liabilities that did not have any benefit to the enterprise."
New GM: The Detroit-based automaker, which filed for court protection on June 1, wants to use bankruptcy to create a new company and shed crushing debt and expensive contracts.
Under the plan, U.S. taxpayers would end up owning 60% of the new GM, with other stakes held by Canadian governments, bondholders and the United Auto Workers union.
Holders of $27 billion in GM bonds would get stock in the reorganized company, as will a union-controlled trust fund that will take stock rather than the $20 billion in cash it had been owed to pay future retiree health care costs. Those 650,000 retirees will have their coverage reduced.
GM plans to close more than a dozen factories, drop U.S. brands and shut down up to 40% of its network of 6,000 dealerships.
A successful and swift move through bankruptcy is crucial to GM's restructuring and a key test of the Obama administration's efforts to rescue GM and Chrysler.
Chrysler's bankruptcy was approved on June 1, just hours before GM entered Chapter 11. An attempt by creditors to block the Chrysler bankruptcy was turned back by the U.S. Supreme Court.
On Friday, in a move that could smooth its restructuring, GM filed documents in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York saying that it had agreed to accept legal responsibility, post-bankruptcy, for drivers who are injured by vehicle defects in old cars.
'Business is doing better': General Motors is trying to turn itself around amid slumping auto sales and a severe recession.
On Tuesday, GM's chief executive testified that the company's June sales were stronger than expected -- in part because the bankruptcy process is going swiftly.
0:00 /04:27Inside GM's fight for survival
"Business is doing better for a number of reasons, one of which being that this process will be quick," said General Motors CEO Fritz Henderson.
In 2008, GM announced its largest-ever annual loss of $38.7 billion. The company has $27 billion in debt. In May, its stock slipped below $1 a share for the first time since the Great Depression.
Lawyers representing a variety of claims against GM -- including asbestos-related and consumer -- subjected Henderson to a barrage of questions in testimony. They wanted to know why clients had been left behind in the bankruptcy process. Henderson said the decision to leave the claims out of the bankruptcy process was concluded during negotiations with the U.S. Treasury. To top of page
First Published: July 2, 2009: 10:27 AM ET"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Wilson, a member of the Auto team, is pro NEW GM and 363 sale.
"Wilson, who has made a career out of investing in distressed firms"
I wonder if Wilson has GM Bonds or CCYPQ. That is the only way to to be part of the new GM.
Interview with attorney, Michael Richman of Patton and Boggs, for "Family and Dissident GM Bondholders".
About the GM Plan regarding the Bondholders. Nice and informative.
Part 1:
http://gtv.shadowtv.net/w/playback.action?format=audio/mpeg&guid=A3ED18BB-BA1C-7101-66A7-3836BDACAC6A&ownerguid=1A132ACA-C2CE-960E-7E32-4DD67F07E7CA
Part 2:
http://gtv.shadowtv.net/w/playback.action?format=audio/mpeg&guid=DFA394ED-1A6A-7EBC-CC2C-1DD014AFEDA5&ownerguid=1A132ACA-C2CE-960E-7E32-4DD67F07E7CA#
Filled 1000@$1.75 (limit $1.80).
I use Zions Direct which flows through Pershing (Bank of New York Mellon). Bonds are $10.95 flat.
Not sure how to profit from Lehman. Bonds might be the best bet just like all the others. Too many people believe BK stock is the way to fortunes.
Congrats on your fill. Was that a partial fill or complete fill? Mine never filled. What broker do you use?
As for your PM, ya, I knew about their Bank. The Bank is getting recapitalized or in the process of getting recapitalized from the parent company while in BK. Thanks for letting me know about taking the refi's off the books. It should definitely bring some value in the future especially for someone looking for a charter/merge.
Only problem is finding a way to profit from it. LOL
As it stands now, the assets are not enough to cover the liabilities for Lehmans (right now there are some pumpers and some that are deliberately misleading others saying assets are greater than liabilities.). I read an article that if the take 2/3 years to do an orderly wind down, then the assets would have recovered significantly, but that is quite a long time. Their debts/bonds have been on my radar for some time now, I just have not bought any yet.
They also have an asset: Neuberger (SP). If they have some sort of re-org plan that included having debt convert to stock of Neuberger, I would diff buy it, for the right price of course. That was the parent's crown jewel.
I stopped researching it because that one is going to take a while.
Well, signing off. Got to wake up w/ the market.
Cheers!
No, I was bidding the same; you just just better connections :)
Followers
|
8
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
174
|
Created
|
06/17/09
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Lehman ABS Corp., 7.375% Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, Series 2001-8, Class A-1
The trust is comprised of $32,575,000 principal amount of General Motors 8.10% Debentures due 6/14/2024 (MTLQ.GF / CUSIP 370442AV7). The underlying securities will be exchanged for equity securities in New GM. Debtholders are expected to receive 10 percent of the common stock in New GM and warrants to buy another 15 percent. GM is expected to be a public company within 6 to 18 months.
The issue price was $25. Each certificate represents a 1/40 interest in the underlying $1,000 debenture. The prices of the CCYPQ and MTLQ.GF should be highly correlated. For example, CCYPQ should trade near $2.50 if the underlying security, MTLQ.GF trades at 10 or $100 per $1000. The trust will receive New GM securities, which will be sold and the proceeds distributed to certificate holders. CCYPQ may trade at a slight discount since the trustee will be eligible to receive reimbursement of Extraordinary Expenses prior to any distribution to certificate holders. Extraordinary Expenses will arise from efforts to protect certificateholders.
This is a thinly-traded issue. There were only 1,303,000 CorTS certificates issued. There are no market makers in this security. It is not listed, traded or quoted on any stock exchange, the OTCBB or the Pink Sheets. Trades in grey market stocks are reported by broker-dealers to their Self Regulatory Organization (SRO) and the SRO distributes the trade data to market data vendors and financial websites so investors can track price and volume. Since grey market securities are not traded or quoted on an exchange or interdealer quotation system, investor's bids and offers are not collected in a central spot so market transparency is diminished and Best Execution of orders is difficult.
Three Month Chart:
GM Filing Date Forward Chart:
To obtain pricing data for MTLQ.GF / CUSIP:370442AV7, click below:
http://cxa.marketwatch.com/finra/BondCenter/BondDetail.aspx?ID=MzcwNDQyQVY3
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |