Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: JimLur, dmiller, dndodd, pochemunyet, olddog967, Hydro_gen
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 1/20/2018 12:51:34 PM - Followers: 861 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 3

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.


Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.


This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

Current Price
Bid Ask Day's Range
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
IDCC News: Amended Statement of Ownership (sc 13g/a) 01/19/2018 02:18:44 PM
IDCC News: Current Report Filing (8-k) 01/18/2018 07:13:24 AM
IDCC News: Current Report Filing (8-k) 01/16/2018 04:13:03 PM
IDCC News: InterDigital to Present at 20th Annual Needham Growth Conference 01/04/2018 04:30:00 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 01/02/2018 04:09:10 PM
#420694  Sticky Note InterDigital Offers Best Tech Growth Without Individual Company Risk dws 12/28/17 12:00:59 PM
#419837  Sticky Note Please do not miss the importance of the loophole73 11/05/17 12:45:18 PM
#420984   Blackrock adds to their position when they open vegas options 01/20/18 12:51:34 PM
#420983   O/T Loophole or any Constitutional lawyers or other mickeybritt 01/20/18 08:42:12 AM
#420982   I bot shares in Blackrock last year on tnyellowtomcat 01/20/18 08:29:25 AM
#420981   <<What I found interesting in the charts was LTE 01/19/18 11:36:28 PM
#420979   A-H: 112k shares at 79.45. pochemunyet 01/19/18 06:36:14 PM
#420978   let's see, they're a deep-pocketed, highly successful investment gejebr3 01/19/18 05:57:09 PM
#420977   Obviously they have more confidence in this company bulldzr 01/19/18 05:34:36 PM
#420976   Don't think you add more shares to your jjff 01/19/18 04:27:01 PM
#420975   gejebr3: - please enlighten us as to why/how FISH21049 01/19/18 03:56:44 PM
#420973   looks like they added some more since q3 gejebr3 01/19/18 03:01:09 PM
#420972   Blackrock has a bunch of shares - don't squingeqbob 01/19/18 02:22:28 PM
#420971   all options traders...need to know... jeffree 01/19/18 12:57:14 PM
#420970   Hydro -- we need some of the analysts FISH21049 01/19/18 12:34:07 PM
#420969   mister: Not true. FISH21049 01/19/18 12:26:15 PM
#420968   United States Patent 9,872,196 Gamco 01/19/18 12:07:45 PM
#420967   United States Patent 9,871,831 Gamco 01/19/18 12:06:27 PM
#420966   United States Patent 9,872,228 Gamco 01/19/18 12:05:29 PM
#420965   Industrial Internet Consortium and National Institute of Standards Gamco 01/19/18 11:59:11 AM
#420964   "It is the mark of an educated mind Hydro_gen 01/19/18 11:57:14 AM
#420961   sons or no one else has added any mister 01/19/18 11:11:07 AM
#420960   Is everything they are doing to peg IDCC birdiehunter 01/19/18 09:59:26 AM
#420959   President Trump Considering Fining China For Intellectual Property Theft JimLur 01/19/18 07:26:13 AM
#420958   yea, totally agree, as Buffet-Buffeee says "every day Limejuice22 01/19/18 03:50:01 AM
#420957   And you, like a broken record, spew the Sammdogg 01/18/18 10:14:29 PM
#420956   Mister why would IDCC go to $200 if my3sons87 01/18/18 07:08:45 PM
#420955   sons maybe you should stop telling people what mister 01/18/18 06:07:20 PM
#420954   agreed with the incredible stock market surge for mister 01/18/18 06:04:51 PM
#420953   Orientbull you sound very frustrated with IDCC. Maybe my3sons87 01/18/18 05:57:38 PM
#420952   IMO, wish someone would step in and buy orientbull 01/18/18 04:26:20 PM
#420951   you can listen to the presentation on their orientbull 01/18/18 04:12:47 PM
#420950   no listen to presentation ? Paullee 01/18/18 01:36:37 PM
#420949   Thanks, OD redviking 01/18/18 12:44:19 PM
#420948   Paulee: I haven't heard the presentation, but olddog967 01/18/18 12:25:53 PM
#420947   redviking: Even though it is a non-cash olddog967 01/18/18 12:10:36 PM
#420946   Cutting Edge 3D Display Technology Optical Hardware redviking 01/18/18 11:32:47 AM
#420945   From 3rd quarter earnings report!!! mickeybritt 01/18/18 11:29:49 AM
#420944   Did I miss something, or did they not Paullee 01/18/18 10:18:42 AM
#420943   fwiw - from a TA perspective last week gejebr3 01/18/18 09:51:53 AM
#420942   Exactly, not sure how one would point out dclarke 01/18/18 09:24:40 AM
#420941   Does the non-cash charge affect Q4 revenues/earnings or redviking 01/18/18 09:03:34 AM
#420940   How do you think this will impact the jjff 01/18/18 08:59:03 AM
#420939 This email is compliments of MJPLIFE11 01/18/18 08:48:54 AM
#420938   8-K out - today's Needham Growth Conference presentation. Hydro_gen 01/18/18 07:26:40 AM
#420937   I wasn't around for Qualcomm, but was for pochemunyet 01/17/18 06:01:23 PM
#420936   I was around when Interdigital settled their dispute ziploc_1 01/17/18 05:43:32 PM
#420935   Oh, right, I see there was a stay. pochemunyet 01/17/18 04:47:08 PM
#420934   pochemunyet: The ZTE litigation is not over. olddog967 01/17/18 03:31:20 PM
#420933   No our agreements are like the Coca Cola jjff 01/17/18 03:22:21 PM
#420932   InterDigital to Present at 20th Annual Needham Growth Conference Gamco 01/17/18 03:08:08 PM
#420931   So ZTE and Pegatron litigation is over. Shouldn't pochemunyet 01/17/18 03:04:35 PM