Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: JimLur, dmiller, dndodd, pochemunyet, olddog967, Hydro_gen
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 4/24/2018 12:08:50 PM - Followers: 864 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 11

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.


Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.


This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

Current Price
Bid Ask Day's Range
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
IDCC News: Eric Cohen Joins InterDigital as Chief Development Officer 04/23/2018 08:30:00 AM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 04/18/2018 04:23:19 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 04/18/2018 04:18:34 PM
IDCC News: Additional Proxy Soliciting Materials (definitive) (defa14a) 04/18/2018 09:13:04 AM
IDCC News: Proxy Statement (definitive) (def 14a) 04/18/2018 09:07:12 AM
PlusOneCoin Top Posts
No plusone'd posts yet. Be the first!
#421648  Sticky Note This article is not honest about the basic longinvestor_98 03/02/18 10:26:02 AM
#421442  Sticky Note I am tired of the surprises. We proved loophole73 02/22/18 05:50:23 PM
#422257   I also did not expect this decision. I my3sons87 04/24/18 12:09:42 PM
#422256   The Oil States decision did leave plenty of my3sons87 04/24/18 12:08:50 PM
#422255   Supreme Court Strikes Down PTAB Partial Decisions Paullee 04/24/18 11:46:19 AM
#422254   High Court Rules AIA Reviews Are Constitutional Paullee 04/24/18 11:44:40 AM
#422253   I known nothing ........ but it looks like scruffynyc1 04/24/18 11:40:27 AM
#422252   OIL STATES ENERGY SERVICES, LLC v. GREENE’S Hydro_gen 04/24/18 10:51:19 AM
#422251   So that’s bad ? felix7 04/24/18 10:22:25 AM
#422250   ?????? 7 - 2 AGAINST Oil States max411 04/24/18 10:21:26 AM
#422249   United States Patent 9,955,174 Gamco 04/24/18 09:47:57 AM
#422248   United States Patent 9,955,375 Gamco 04/24/18 09:47:21 AM
#422247   United States Patent 9,955,393 Gamco 04/24/18 09:46:48 AM
#422246   O’dog the spirit of cooperation is what makes my3sons87 04/23/18 06:23:13 PM
#422245   my3sons: You are correct. I missed that: olddog967 04/23/18 04:46:07 PM
#422244   or as the editor of patnews put it: Paullee 04/23/18 04:34:36 PM
#422243   O’dog in the Oil States (PTAB) case only my3sons87 04/23/18 04:26:59 PM
#422242   Paulee: While both cases are related to olddog967 04/23/18 04:13:27 PM
#422241   Question does anyone have level 2 on IHUB? JimLur 04/23/18 02:00:36 PM
#422240   Paullee this SCOTUS case regarding administrative judges is my3sons87 04/23/18 11:54:32 AM
#422239   Eric Cohen LinkedIn profile. LutherTiggs 04/23/18 11:43:55 AM
#422238   no mention of PTAB here, but is this Paullee 04/23/18 09:47:56 AM
#422237   He's from Dolby. I like what I hear. pochemunyet 04/23/18 09:41:39 AM
#422236   This is a solid recruit, IMO. He's a deal-maker. dws 04/23/18 09:23:15 AM
#422235   Eric Cohen Joins InterDigital as Chief Development Officer Gamco 04/23/18 09:19:32 AM
#422234   Nice...that man has connections... jeffree 04/23/18 09:19:16 AM
#422233   Eric Cohen Joins InterDigital as Chief Development Officer pochemunyet 04/23/18 08:35:33 AM
#422232   Jeffree, Someone bought 41 contracts in my June vegas options 04/20/18 02:13:43 PM
#422231   Good catch, Vegas...Did you notice if jeffree 04/20/18 12:35:42 PM
#422230   Anyone know? I would like to sab63090 04/20/18 10:37:30 AM
#422229   Weird. Large blocks trading sporadically. pochemunyet 04/20/18 10:00:23 AM
#422228   jeffree, I hearby give notice that you since94 04/20/18 09:43:44 AM
#422227   ZTE.....has this been posted? sab63090 04/20/18 09:19:57 AM
#422226   Jeffree, did you notice that all of the vegas options 04/20/18 09:01:38 AM
#422225   PSA... Tomorrow is ex-dividend date... jeffree 04/19/18 01:23:07 PM
#422224   United States Patent 9,946,356 Gamco 04/19/18 12:35:03 PM
#422223   United States Patent 9,948,414 Gamco 04/19/18 12:33:39 PM
#422222   United States Patent 9,949,180 Gamco 04/19/18 12:33:10 PM
#422221   United States Patent 9,949,189 Gamco 04/19/18 12:32:34 PM
#422220   United States Patent 9,949,225 Gamco 04/19/18 12:31:55 PM
#422219   Sammdogg: A couple of announcements that could olddog967 04/18/18 06:08:36 PM
#422218   If I remember correctly we had some research Sammdogg 04/18/18 05:11:00 PM
#422217 pochemunyet 04/18/18 02:57:54 PM
#422216   I can't help but sense that something is pochemunyet 04/18/18 02:48:21 PM
#422215   robweis, I have found it strange that IDCC has IDCCfan 04/18/18 02:35:50 PM
#422214   Nokia Bell Labs, InterDigital, Verizon, and AT&T robweis 04/18/18 01:52:40 PM
#422213   I find it interesting that the article stated patopinion 04/18/18 10:41:47 AM
#422212   I saw this article in Businessweek and had Drannac 04/18/18 09:15:03 AM
#422211   Breaking Down The Appeals In $1B VirnetX-Apple Patent War Paullee 04/18/18 08:17:50 AM
#422210   $80 close. Nice! pochemunyet 04/17/18 04:00:15 PM
#422209   Hydro gen: olddog967 04/17/18 03:46:51 PM
#422208   We know IDCC has been involved in the IDCCfan 04/17/18 03:30:58 PM