Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

IDCC RSS Feed
Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: JimLur, dndodd
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 5/18/2022 9:36:08 PM - Followers: 867 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0



http://www.interdigital.com

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 
 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.
 

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.

 

Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.

Duplicate

This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Spam
Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

Vulgarity
  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

Threat
A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

IDCC
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
IDCC News: Quarterly Report (10-q) 05/05/2022 04:37:52 AM
IDCC News: Current Report Filing (8-k) 05/05/2022 04:35:24 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital Announces Financial Results For First Quarter 2022 05/05/2022 04:30:44 AM
IDCC News: New report by InterDigital and Futuresource Consulting details new video opportunities transformed and catalyzed “only on 5G” 05/03/2022 12:00:00 AM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 04/29/2022 01:14:18 PM
PostSubject
#429928   Here here. Jim we are still here. Personally my3sons87 05/18/22 09:36:08 PM
#429927   It is working Jim, good to see your name. zdog 05/18/22 08:36:17 PM
#429923   TEST JimLur 05/18/22 08:16:21 PM
#429921   thx for the chuckle Paullee 05/15/22 01:07:07 PM
#429920   Most likely large-cap and small-cap merger candidates -BofA 11:42 dws 05/15/22 12:19:54 PM
#429919   I read the transcript of the call as zdog 05/05/22 06:33:55 PM
#429918   Did anyone listen to the conference call and squingeqbob 05/05/22 05:10:36 PM
#429917   Any guess why they combine litigation and share zdog 05/05/22 10:45:07 AM
#429916   You are correct, sir! And I see that squingeqbob 05/05/22 10:29:49 AM
#429915   InterDigital Announces Financial Results For First Quarter 2022 Gamco 05/05/22 10:28:47 AM
#429914   Squinge you did not post the 1st quarter my3sons87 05/05/22 10:16:08 AM
#429913   There's that Avanci money....I think....we'll take it. TXDave 05/05/22 09:25:02 AM
#429912   Chen - “I am particularly pleased with our LTE 05/05/22 09:03:46 AM
#429911   Looks like my cutting and pasting skills are squingeqbob 05/05/22 08:55:02 AM
#429910   This looks not too bad! I think. squingeqbob 05/05/22 08:34:54 AM
#429909   InterDigital Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2021 squingeqbob 05/05/22 08:31:11 AM
#429908   IMO there has historically been hopeful anticipation before squingeqbob 05/05/22 08:00:12 AM
#429907   Nice bump in the stock price yesterday. Monterey2000 05/05/22 07:57:46 AM
#429906   That would be nice! tnyellowtomcat 05/04/22 05:31:58 PM
#429905   I found this today IMMC1990 05/04/22 11:59:54 AM
#429904   Why are we up today? scooby5 05/04/22 11:35:19 AM
#429903   Thanks, I was surprised they have signed 37 zdog 05/03/22 10:49:58 AM
#429902   https://finance.yahoo.com/news/avanci-announces-patent-license-agreement-1300007 TXDave 05/03/22 10:39:28 AM
#429901   New report by InterDigital and Futuresource Consulting details Gamco 05/03/22 07:42:35 AM
#429900   Shortie is busy with his articles. I want my3sons87 05/01/22 10:44:22 PM
#429899   These articles are always very narrow minded, and tnyellowtomcat 05/01/22 09:49:13 PM
#429898   Returns On Capital At InterDigital (NASDAQ:IDCC) Paint A FISH21049 05/01/22 04:36:13 PM
#429897   zdog that is the judge’s opinion. I’d rather my3sons87 04/30/22 03:42:07 PM
#429896   Kind of bad though that out of all zdog 04/29/22 12:44:43 PM
#429895   Paullee thank goodness that was a old patent my3sons87 04/29/22 12:39:50 PM
#429894   InterDigital Can't Appeal Invalidation Of UK Wireless Patent Paullee 04/29/22 09:53:56 AM
#429893   I always like receiving it. Talk about zdog 04/28/22 12:30:23 PM
#429892   Dividend was paid yesterday my3sons87 04/28/22 11:51:36 AM
#429891   Monterey, you might try emailing investor relations like squingeqbob 04/28/22 09:03:02 AM
#429890   Is U.S. Patent No. 8,199,726 a part of Monterey2000 04/27/22 04:52:10 PM
#429889   O wait this is Delaware and not uk? bim524 04/26/22 06:21:57 PM
#429888   Thanks for keeping up on this for the board. zdog 04/26/22 06:10:03 PM
#429887   Thx paullee How many patents were in the case? bim524 04/26/22 04:43:06 PM
#429886   Well, that's an interesting tidbit. squingeqbob 04/26/22 03:18:21 PM
#429885   Settlement? dndodd 04/26/22 03:00:23 PM
#429884   InterDigital Technology Corporation et al v. Lenovo Holding Paullee 04/26/22 01:55:44 PM
#429883   Thanks Paullee. my3sons87 04/26/22 01:20:19 PM
#429882   nothing i can see Paullee 04/26/22 09:52:51 AM
#429881   Thx, my3s. squingeqbob 04/26/22 08:27:40 AM
#429880   Squinge maybe in May or June. Nothing as my3sons87 04/25/22 07:07:00 PM
#429879   Any word from the British courts that might squingeqbob 04/25/22 12:26:39 PM
#429878   Well, this calls for some celebratin'. Maybe a squingeqbob 04/21/22 04:08:59 PM
#429877   Valid point! dsteeler 04/21/22 11:40:18 AM
#429876   Not unusual they have hired several from Nokia. dndodd 04/21/22 10:37:29 AM
#429875   Interesting turn of events. Interdigital bringing on dsteeler 04/21/22 10:25:41 AM
PostSubject
Consent Preferences