Cannabis Report
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: JimLur, dmiller, dndodd, pochemunyet, olddog967, Hydro_gen
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 6/23/2018 9:32:36 AM - Followers: 862 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 1

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.


Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.


This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

Cannabis Report
Current Price
Bid Ask Day's Range
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
IDCC News: Annual Report of Employee Stock Plans (11-k) 06/19/2018 05:15:32 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 06/18/2018 04:33:43 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 06/18/2018 04:31:35 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 06/18/2018 04:28:33 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 06/18/2018 04:24:10 PM
PlusOneCoin Top Posts
No plusone'd posts yet. Be the first!
#422315  Sticky Note Let's break down the earnings announcement: la-idcc-fan 04/26/18 10:58:30 AM
#421442  Sticky Note I am tired of the surprises. We proved loophole73 02/22/18 05:50:23 PM
#422980   olddog, He goes on and on about a vegas options 06/23/18 09:32:35 AM
#422979   tnyellowtomcat: I don't follow technical analysis/charting. I olddog967 06/22/18 05:32:35 PM
#422978   329,038 shares traded after hours + over 150K redviking 06/22/18 04:45:31 PM
#422977   Tuesday, June 11, 2018. tnyellowtomcat 06/22/18 04:13:55 PM
#422976   The yahoo 5 day candle chart showed it tnyellowtomcat 06/22/18 04:11:37 PM
#422975   I am in now and have been so tnyellowtomcat 06/22/18 04:09:26 PM
#422974   Not to jump into this yet this site Hydro_gen 06/22/18 02:15:40 PM
#422973   be sure to let us know when you're gejebr3 06/22/18 01:28:15 PM
#422972   You the new dmiller? felix7 06/22/18 01:10:00 PM
#422971   Oh BOY! Down today. Well there tnyellowtomcat 06/22/18 12:43:36 PM
#422970   Thanks for your comment loop. IMMC1990 06/22/18 11:40:12 AM
#422969   This is an opening. SEP's are infringed around loophole73 06/22/18 11:18:47 AM
#422968   U.S. Supreme Court backs Schlumberger on overseas patent damages. IMMC1990 06/22/18 10:50:36 AM
#422967   Olddog Since you follow me so much and was mickeybritt 06/22/18 09:17:04 AM
#422966   Paulee: An interesting argument regarding the appointment olddog967 06/21/18 06:32:17 PM
#422965   thx, bossman Paullee 06/21/18 06:06:11 PM
#422964   Paullee: The decision should have no effect on olddog967 06/21/18 06:03:13 PM
#422963   Now what will this do to the PTAB Paullee 06/21/18 05:09:47 PM
#422962   Vegas, Hi. You know I am watching the tnyellowtomcat 06/21/18 10:12:39 AM
#422961   I did not post before as I did vegas options 06/21/18 09:06:07 AM
#422960   Vegas, Lets see - you say you have been tnyellowtomcat 06/20/18 11:30:33 PM
#422959   Vegas, I like Mickey also, just offered the opinion tnyellowtomcat 06/20/18 11:23:01 PM
#422958   I believe that I can back it up. vegas options 06/20/18 07:59:51 PM
#422957   Pretty boastful statement there. You'd be surprised...... dws 06/20/18 07:57:37 PM
#422956   How clueless can one person be? I have vegas options 06/20/18 07:41:28 PM
#422955   I would guess you have some close in tnyellowtomcat 06/20/18 07:20:56 PM
#422954   I haven't sold my shares. I have tnyellowtomcat 06/20/18 07:18:50 PM
#422953   I guess that since you posted about this vegas options 06/20/18 04:09:34 PM
#422952   United States Patent 10,003,933 Gamco 06/20/18 01:28:19 PM
#422951   United States Patent 10,004,080 Gamco 06/20/18 01:27:39 PM
#422950   Paullee thanks for the Apple c QCOM article. my3sons87 06/20/18 12:34:27 PM
#422949   Vegas, I hope IDCC doesn't have to go back tnyellowtomcat 06/20/18 10:06:04 AM
#422948   I am sure you have tested your theory vegas options 06/20/18 09:37:24 AM
#422947   Apple Pushes Monopoly Concerns In Qualcomm ITC Fight Paullee 06/20/18 05:38:23 AM
#422946   There is a gap & you admitted it! tnyellowtomcat 06/19/18 02:35:02 PM
#422945   There is no gap on the day you vegas options 06/19/18 01:04:02 PM
#422944   I am glad the Senate passed the bill my3sons87 06/19/18 11:39:35 AM
#422943   "China is limited somewhat in the amount of JohnSamuel 06/19/18 11:17:24 AM
#422942   For got to mention over $ 1 TRILLION jjff 06/19/18 11:08:33 AM
#422941   With China having I believe over a $5 jjff 06/19/18 10:55:59 AM
#422940   Loophole73: Thanks for your reply; and, to be honest, sab63090 06/19/18 10:44:57 AM
#422939   One of these days I will play gap tnyellowtomcat 06/19/18 10:39:03 AM
#422938   HOW STUPENDOUSLY BORING! tnyellowtomcat 06/19/18 10:33:55 AM
#422937   We can get a judgment, but collecting will loophole73 06/19/18 10:28:17 AM
#422936   ZTE Any thoughts on ZTE ever paying IDCC? Senate sab63090 06/19/18 10:06:21 AM
#422935   U.S. Senate just passed H.R. 5515 (defense bill) str8_chuter 06/18/18 07:56:42 PM
#422934   I believe that it is and they should JohnSamuel 06/18/18 06:24:17 PM
#422933   SEC violation! jjff 06/18/18 06:03:22 PM
#422932   Can anyone see any other CEO getting away JohnSamuel 06/18/18 04:37:11 PM
#422931   Apple brings 5G and national security into Qualcomm Gamco 06/18/18 11:22:04 AM