|It was $88 oreenos earlier this morning!!||Monterey2000||11:22 AM|
|GUESS WHAT ! ! !||FISH21049||9:36 AM|
|can someone post cliff notes on this mornings||lumpy3||9:08 AM|
|Anything going on here?....it seems really quiet ..no.news!!||teecee56||06/06/23 5:49 PM|
|I guess someone wanted “in” this morning.||amrwonderful||06/06/23 12:05 PM|
|52 week high||vegas options||06/06/23 11:20 AM|
|Vegas, thanks for your reasons why.||israt||06/05/23 7:01 PM|
|israt, ASM on Wednesday. Insiders are not selling||vegas options||06/05/23 6:22 PM|
|Why?||israt||06/05/23 5:54 PM|
|On the new Form 4's they sold only||vegas options||06/05/23 5:20 PM|
|Questions Abound On EU Plan For New Essential||Paullee||06/02/23 3:45 PM|
|Paullee I hope Jones is going to buy||my3sons87||06/02/23 1:18 PM|
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AN||Paullee||06/02/23 10:26 AM|
|RE A.I....i think its a poorly||teecee56||06/01/23 8:58 AM|
|InterDigital’s Alec Brusilovsky Elected Vice Chair of the||dws||06/01/23 4:05 AM|
|TC, came for happy hour, stayed, and still||Monterey2000||05/31/23 9:26 PM|
|Monterey...did 5 o'clock charlie wave to the crowd??||teecee56||05/31/23 7:50 PM|
|AND THEN....and then ...and then....teeeheee||teecee56||05/31/23 7:48 PM|
|IDCC share price is up $2.46 in after||Monterey2000||05/31/23 6:14 PM|
|Teecee and Gamco thanks.||my3sons87||05/31/23 4:30 PM|
|My3sons87 - About 275k shares changed hands during||Gamco||05/31/23 4:16 PM|
|leon...a little back and fill is ok...we've just||teecee56||05/31/23 2:46 PM|
|Is it that no news is good news,||my3sons87||05/31/23 1:22 PM|
|I saw the same thing you did...I interpreted||teecee56||05/25/23 8:55 PM|
|Apple is buying 5G wireless technology from Broadcom (AVGO)||Monterey2000||05/25/23 4:22 PM|
|Teecee56, on May 18th 760K of shares traded||vegas options||05/25/23 3:20 PM|
|vegas....thats a healthy increase from 2.7myn......there was a||teecee56||05/25/23 1:41 PM|
|Time to crank up the stock buyback program.||scooby5||05/25/23 10:57 AM|
|Short interest 3.1M||vegas options||05/24/23 4:46 PM|
|Vegas Options - Yes and YES. But, if||Gamco||05/22/23 11:05 AM|
|Gamco, If the company has to wait until||vegas options||05/22/23 10:52 AM|
|Vegas Options - just wait until the price||Gamco||05/22/23 10:40 AM|
|Gamco, tell me where I can buy them||vegas options||05/22/23 10:28 AM|
|Vegas Options - The bond holders at maturity||Gamco||05/22/23 9:30 AM|
|Zacks.com featured highlights Interdigital||Monterey2000||05/22/23 9:24 AM|
|Gamco, No. The bonds decay equal to the||vegas options||05/22/23 8:49 AM|
|Glen you could buy the converts.back...and sell off||teecee56||05/22/23 7:26 AM|
|Vegas options - after 130% of the $77.49||Gamco||05/21/23 11:30 PM|
|Gamco, why would you want to buy the||vegas options||05/21/23 10:17 PM|
|I wish that I could answer of the||Gamco||05/21/23 3:32 PM|
|How long will IDCC continue the stock buyback?||Monterey2000||05/20/23 3:33 PM|
|imm....on a technical basis....this is what my favorite||teecee56||05/20/23 9:51 AM|
|point of interest...5 o'clock charlie made an appearance||teecee56||05/20/23 9:24 AM|
|InterDigital’s Energy Aware Media Team Awarded Best Full-Length||Gamco||05/19/23 7:34 PM|
|@InterDigitalCom, leader in #wireless evolution from #5G to||Gamco||05/19/23 7:23 PM|
|IMM, there is only one rule that always||vegas options||05/19/23 3:33 PM|
|What's this board's consensus as to the share||sinceIMM||05/19/23 3:04 PM|
|IDCC may have the technology Meta needs for||Monterey2000||05/19/23 1:03 PM|
|Looks like about 150K shares will change hands||vegas options||05/19/23 12:51 PM|
|IMO if IDCC has what Meta wants, the||orientbull||05/19/23 9:01 AM|
The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards:
|To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.|
It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.
At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.
It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.
In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.
While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.
This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.
This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.
If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.
Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.
Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.