Full Editor
Likes Subject
It was $88 oreenos earlier this morning!! Monterey2000 11:22 AM
GUESS WHAT ! ! ! FISH21049 9:36 AM
can someone post cliff notes on this mornings lumpy3 9:08 AM
Anything going on here?....it seems really quiet ..no.news!! teecee56 06/06/23 5:49 PM
I guess someone wanted “in” this morning. amrwonderful 06/06/23 12:05 PM
52 week high vegas options 06/06/23 11:20 AM
Vegas, thanks for your reasons why. israt 06/05/23 7:01 PM
israt, ASM on Wednesday. Insiders are not selling vegas options 06/05/23 6:22 PM
Why? israt 06/05/23 5:54 PM
On the new Form 4's they sold only vegas options 06/05/23 5:20 PM
Questions Abound On EU Plan For New Essential Paullee 06/02/23 3:45 PM
Paullee I hope Jones is going to buy my3sons87 06/02/23 1:18 PM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AN Paullee 06/02/23 10:26 AM
RE A.I....i think its a poorly teecee56 06/01/23 8:58 AM
InterDigital’s Alec Brusilovsky Elected Vice Chair of the dws 06/01/23 4:05 AM
TC, came for happy hour, stayed, and still Monterey2000 05/31/23 9:26 PM
Monterey...did 5 o'clock charlie wave to the crowd?? teecee56 05/31/23 7:50 PM
AND THEN....and then ...and then....teeeheee teecee56 05/31/23 7:48 PM
IDCC share price is up $2.46 in after Monterey2000 05/31/23 6:14 PM
Teecee and Gamco thanks. my3sons87 05/31/23 4:30 PM
My3sons87 - About 275k shares changed hands during Gamco 05/31/23 4:16 PM
leon...a little back and fill is ok...we've just teecee56 05/31/23 2:46 PM
Is it that no news is good news, my3sons87 05/31/23 1:22 PM
I saw the same thing you did...I interpreted teecee56 05/25/23 8:55 PM
Apple is buying 5G wireless technology from Broadcom (AVGO) Monterey2000 05/25/23 4:22 PM
Teecee56, on May 18th 760K of shares traded vegas options 05/25/23 3:20 PM
vegas....thats a healthy increase from 2.7myn......there was a teecee56 05/25/23 1:41 PM
Time to crank up the stock buyback program. scooby5 05/25/23 10:57 AM
Short interest 3.1M vegas options 05/24/23 4:46 PM
Vegas Options - Yes and YES. But, if Gamco 05/22/23 11:05 AM
Gamco, If the company has to wait until vegas options 05/22/23 10:52 AM
Vegas Options - just wait until the price Gamco 05/22/23 10:40 AM
Gamco, tell me where I can buy them vegas options 05/22/23 10:28 AM
Vegas Options - The bond holders at maturity Gamco 05/22/23 9:30 AM
Zacks.com featured highlights Interdigital Monterey2000 05/22/23 9:24 AM
Gamco, No. The bonds decay equal to the vegas options 05/22/23 8:49 AM
Glen you could buy the converts.back...and sell off teecee56 05/22/23 7:26 AM
Vegas options - after 130% of the $77.49 Gamco 05/21/23 11:30 PM
Gamco, why would you want to buy the vegas options 05/21/23 10:17 PM
I wish that I could answer of the Gamco 05/21/23 3:32 PM
How long will IDCC continue the stock buyback? Monterey2000 05/20/23 3:33 PM
imm....on a technical basis....this is what my favorite teecee56 05/20/23 9:51 AM
point of interest...5 o'clock charlie made an appearance teecee56 05/20/23 9:24 AM
InterDigital’s Energy Aware Media Team Awarded Best Full-Length Gamco 05/19/23 7:34 PM
@InterDigitalCom, leader in #wireless evolution from #5G to Gamco 05/19/23 7:23 PM
IMM, there is only one rule that always vegas options 05/19/23 3:33 PM
What's this board's consensus as to the share sinceIMM 05/19/23 3:04 PM
IDCC may have the technology Meta needs for Monterey2000 05/19/23 1:03 PM
Looks like about 150K shares will change hands vegas options 05/19/23 12:51 PM
IMO if IDCC has what Meta wants, the orientbull 05/19/23 9:01 AM
Likes Subject

9:36 AM
06/06/23 12:05 PM
vegas options
06/06/23 11:20 AM
06/05/23 7:01 PM
vegas options
06/05/23 6:22 PM
06/05/23 5:54 PM
vegas options
06/05/23 5:20 PM
06/02/23 1:18 PM
06/01/23 8:58 AM
05/31/23 9:26 PM
05/31/23 6:14 PM
05/31/23 4:30 PM
05/31/23 1:22 PM
vegas options
05/25/23 3:20 PM
vegas options
05/24/23 4:46 PM
05/22/23 11:05 AM
vegas options
05/22/23 10:52 AM
vegas options
05/22/23 10:28 AM
05/22/23 9:24 AM
vegas options
05/22/23 8:49 AM
vegas options
05/21/23 10:17 PM
05/21/23 3:32 PM
05/20/23 3:33 PM
vegas options
05/19/23 3:33 PM
05/19/23 1:03 PM
vegas options
05/19/23 12:51 PM
05/19/23 9:01 AM

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

Posts (Today)
Posts (Total)
Moderators dndodd


About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.

Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.


This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

New Post