Hate Hillary or like TRUMP board (HILLARY)

[ctrumabll]

Would it surprise you if I tell you that I do not consider anyone associated with the Qanon cult, to be a reliable narrator?

[ncj167]

[ctrumabll]

LOL at both the description of Melania as a "supermodel," and the idea that they sleep in the same room.

[ncj167]

[ncj167]

[Gmenfan]

LMOA .... Thanks! I'll pass that around.

[ncj167]

Who did this? 😭😆😭😆
︎ https://t.co/h8D6WMWHgg

— Red Nation Rising (@RedNationRising) December 20, 2019

[ncj167]

[ncj167]

Slick willy

[Gmenfan]

Now that's funny! I'm passing that along... Thanks

[ncj167]

https://www.facebook.com/100017859543648/posts/498674464071201/

[trkyhntr]

Wall Street big money democrats say they will sit out, or back Trump, if they nominate Elizabeth Warren

Democratic donors on Wall Street and in big business are preparing to sit out the presidential campaign fundraising cycle — or even back President Donald Trump — if Sen. Elizabeth Warren wins the party’s nomination.

In recent weeks, CNBC spoke to several high-dollar Democratic donors and fundraisers in the business community and found that this opinion was becoming widely shared as Warren, an outspoken critic of big banks and corporations, gains momentum against Joe Biden in the 2020 race.“You’re in a box because you’re a Democrat and you’re thinking, ‘I want to help the party, but she’s going to hurt me, so I’m going to help President Trump,’” said a senior private equity executive, who spoke on condition of anonymity in fear of retribution by party leaders. The executive said this Wednesday, a day after Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that the House would begin a formal impeachment inquiry into Trump.

During the campaign, Warren has put out multiple plans intended to curb the influence of Wall Street, including a wealth tax. In July, she released a proposal that would make private equity firms responsible for debts and pension obligations of companies they buy. Trump, meanwhile, has given wealthy business leaders a helping hand with a major corporate tax cut and by eliminating regulations.

Warren has sworn off taking part in big money fundraisers for the 2020 presidential primary. She has also promised to not take donations from special interest groups. She finished raising at least $19 million in the second quarter mainly through small-dollar donors. The third quarter ends Monday.

Trump, has been raising hundreds of millions of dollars, putting any eventual 2020 rival in a bind as about 20 Democrats vie for their party’s nomination.

Trump’s campaign and the Republican National Committee have raised over $100 million in the second quarter. A large portion of that haul came from wealthy donors who gave to their joint fundraising committee, Trump Victory. In August, the RNC raised just over $23 million and has $53 million on hand.

The Democratic National Committee have struggled to keep up. The DNC finished August bringing in $7.9 million and has $7.2 million in debt.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/26/wall-street-democratic-donors-may-back-trump-if-warren-is-nominated.html

[ncj167]

[Gmenfan]

If I were a betting guy I'd put all on 100%.

[al44]

Any guesses on the statistical probability?-

[al44]

Debunking The Media’s Top 6 Lies About President Trump

Below is a guide to help debunk many of the dishonest narratives pushed by the disgraced and discredited political news media as part of their effort to destroy the duly-elected President of the United States, and disenfranchise his tens of millions of supporters. We’ll make light work of the following divisive, dishonest and destructive media-driven claims…

TRUMP IS A RACIST
TRUMP IS A LIAR
TRUMP IS A RAPIST
TRUMP HATES OUR ALLIES AND LOVES OUR ENEMIES
TRUMP IS A FAILED BUSINESSMAN
RUSSIA WANTED TRUMP TO WIN

Feel free to skip ahead to the sections that interest you most.

PART 1: TRUMP IS A RACIST

I already debunked what were, at the time, the media’s “Top 7” lies about President Trump being a racist. In it I addressed the media’s lazy and divisive lies about Charlottesville, the birther movement, “all Mexicans are rapists,” etc. You can read that piece by clicking here.

Since writing that one, the media have manufactured additional dishonest narratives to bolster the tried-and-true Democrat tactic of screaming “RACIST!” at anyone with whom they disagree. Most recently they began claiming that if someone with brown skin hates America, it’s racist to tell them they should leave. The most simple rebuttal for that: If you’re asking me about the guy who says “If you think America is so terrible, then leave” versus the one who says “You can’t say that to someone with brown skin” — I’m telling you right now, the second person is the racist in that conversation.

The most effective way to debunk the media’s lazy and dishonest lies about President Trump being a racist, is to turn the tables on them. The media, along with their Democrat and establishment GOP allies, believe that black and brown people need pity and to be propped up — while white people deserve scorn and to be knocked down. There’s no getting around it. There’s no academic mumbo jumbo that can justify it, or explain it away. This is what they are literally teaching our children, and what they brag about and promote every day on your television screens. They insist that black and brown people need to be treated differently, and that they need special attention and programs and help that’s just for them, and that “whiteness” is a disease that needs to be eradicated. They use “white” as a pejorative while promoting brown identity supremacy as a virtuous and progressive leap forward. It’s in plain sight. It happens all day, every day, across virtually every plane of the mainstream news media, entertainment, and academia.

Whether it’s The Central Park Five or Ilhan Omar, Donald Trump isn’t a racist for not pulling punches when he goes after someone who happens to have brown skin. The media and Democrats who say he should pull his punches based on skin color, while they simultaneously promote metaphoric slavery and literal segregation, are 2019’s most dangerous and effective bigots and racists. (And that point is a solid 50% of what I’ve written about at this website, so just click around if you want to read more about it.)

PART 2: TRUMP IS A LIAR

It’s absolutely true that Donald Trump takes tremendous liberties when engaging in adversarial political spin. But so does virtually every other politician in America. The difference is, Trump is a lot better at it than most because he’s so effective at disposing of those who oppose him. The other difference is that Donald Trump isn’t playing the game the way the media have for decades scared Republicans into doing. Most Trump supporters have spent their lives watching the media lie to and about us, while the feckless and scared GOP told us it wasn’t okay to attack the media for their flagrant bias. The GOP, before Trump, was very much “go along to get along” when it came to the media. In what should be humiliating hindsight for Lindsey Graham, he and John McCain used to sit there side-by-side seemingly every Sunday morning on a variety of programs telling the hosts how terrible the GOP base was for thinking the media is biased.

But because President Trump finally stood up for us and went after the media, they need to pretend that his political spin, embellishments, and attempts at turning subjective opinions into generally accepted principles is somehow wildly unique. It’s unique only in that he’s better at it than most, and he’s giving the mainstream political news media a long overdue butt-kicking in the process.

And how about that constantly-updated list of “lies” that The Washington Post keeps and the rest of the media love to reference, or more recently the 61 “lies” that CNN’s newest Democrat hack (Daniel Dale) complied? The vast majority of what they call “lies” are nothing more than political spin and/or embellishment. A large chunk are also subjective opinion. Only a very small fraction of what the media and discredited “fact checkers” call lies, truly are. And I promise that if you look at everything these fact-checkers have said, and the Democrats and swamp parasites they work so hard to protect, they’ve told just as many if not more.

President Trump is not a liar. He’s just better at the game than the media, Democrats and establishment GOP combined. And so they must do everything they can do destroy him and his supporters.

PART 3: TRUMP IS A RAPIST

Another ongoing narrative pushed by the media is that President Trump is a serial sexual predator who, they claim, admitted as much on tape. This, like the racism charge, is particularly damaging because it’s such a toxic and dishonest claim that in addition to stoking very real division, fear, anger and hatred — also dilutes the gravity of real sexual assault, and the plight of real victims. (Like, for example, the 80% of women who are raped while doing what the media and Democrats have spent decades seducing them into doing: Trying to make a life in America by coming here illegally.)

On the infamous Access Hollywood tape that the media point to as “evidence” of admitted sexual assault, President Trump said “they let you do it.” The word “let” confers consent. Had he said, “When you’re a star they say ‘No!’ but you can do it anyway,” then yes…you could make the claim that he admitted to sexual assault. But that’s not what he said. And while many of President Trump’s foaming-at-the-mouth enemies will roll their eyes at the “”let’ implies consent” distinction, let’s not forget that many of those same perpetual pearl clutchers are on CNN every day taking turns having panic attacks because “WORDS MATTER!” and “FACTS FIRST!” It’s a fact that he said “they let you do it,” and it’s a fact that the word “let” implies consent, and it’s a fact that those words matter.

Has President Trump engaged in extramarital affairs and been with his fair share of women? Probably. Are beautiful women a real weakness for President Trump? Probably. Is there any evidence that President Trump has ever sexually assaulted a woman, let alone many women? No. Not a shred. There’s just a collection of women who magically appeared right before an election, with no contemporaneous or other supporting evidence, and were propped up by a media desperate to protect itself from the man who promised to knee-cap them while draining the swamp they depend on for survival.

PART 4: TRUMP HATES OUR ALLIES AND LOVES OUR ENEMIES

This one is always hilarious to me. Every day, sometimes many times each day, you can find allegedly impartial journalists on CNN and elsewhere whining that…

“President Trump has never met a murderous dictator he didn’t love!”

No need to re-invent the wheel while debunking this one. It’s very simple. The disgraced and discredited U.S. political news media are collectively pretending they’ve never heard the expression “Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.”

It’s mostly true that President Trump sets higher expectations for our allies while stepping more lightly when it comes to our adversaries. But it’s also true that this is the most natural posture in the history of mankind when it comes to navigating relationships of any kind. And there’s a real expectation among many Americans for our allies to step up when it comes to our mostly one-sided relationships with them. And we all know that if we want to get anywhere with North Korea or Russia, for example, trashing their leaders will only hurt those efforts. President Trump took the tough guy tact initially with Chariman Kim of North Korea, but it was a painfully obvious strategy to start at a very adversarial and threatening position and then lure him in by pretending to be best friends. Putin, who is far less isolated and far more savvy, would’ve never fallen for that tact. But the media’s alleged belief that if we just trash Putin and talk really mean then he’ll stop doing things we don’t like, is hilarious. And I say “alleged belief” because the media don’t truly think this would work. And their obsession with the “Why won’t Trump pick a fight with Putin!?” narrative is strategically aimed at accomplishing two goals:

1) Force Trump to tacitly admit that he didn’t win fair-and-square in 2016

2) Ensure he can’t actually get anything meaningful done with a critically important global force like Russia

The media’s “Trump hates our allies and loves our enemies” narrative is a joke.

PART 5: TRUMP IS A BAD BUSINESSMAN

I’ve stipulated in the past that I doubt President Trump is worth nearly as much as he says he is, and that’s likely why he doesn’t want his taxes made public. He says he’s worth around ten billion dollars. I’m guessing the number, if he sold everything and just cashed out, might be closer to half that. But that’s still a huge and impressive number.

“But he got a million dollar loan from his daddy and that’s the only reason he has money now,” many in the media like to argue. For those naysayers I have a very simple question: If I gave you $100, could you turn it into $500,000? Because if Trump got a million dollar loan from his dad and is worth even half what he says he is, that — in numbers more of us can relate to — is exactly what he did.

Was he a tough and shrewd businessman who took advantage of every loophole our government made available? Of course. We wouldn’t have elected him President if we didn’t want him bringing that same toughness, work ethic, and commitment to success to his America First agenda! So miss me with your “He’s actually a terrible businessman who’s basically broke” nonsense. Or, on the other hand, if you think you can turn my $100.00 into $500,000.00 then let me know. I will gladly stop supporting Trump and instead spend all of my time and energy telling everyone how awesome you are. My contact page is linked here. Let me know!

PART 6: RUSSIA WANTED TRUMP TO WIN

Before I get to the important stuff, I have a question for the media and Democrats who are suddenly so worried about “Russian meddling” in our elections: Tell me one single detail about Russia’s efforts to meddle in our elections that happened before 2016. You can’t do it, can you? And do you know why you can’t do it? Because you don’t actually care about Russian meddling. If you did, you’d have even a marginal interest in learning about the history of it before the 2016 election. Russia has always tried to meddle in the integrity of our institutions, including our elections. And the only thing we really learned in 2016 is that their new preferred weapon happens to be the same one the Democrats and media use to gain power and win elections: Identity Politics. The only reason the media are so focused on Russia meddling now is to explain away the 2016 election that they and their preferred candidate lost.

There’s zero evidence that Russia actually wanted Donald Trump to become President. But there’s a ton of evidence that Russia wanted to sow discord, and turn us against each other. The assessments compiled by Jim Comey and John Brennan, which were later distributed in January 2017 by James Clapper and then used by the media and Democrats to claim “Russia wanted Trump to win,” doesn’t actually provide any evidence for the claim. What they do show us is that after the Russians determined that Hillary Clinton would be the clear winner, they began attacking her with more vigor. And I guess you could argue that Donald Trump was an entirely coincidental beneficiary of that recalibration. But Donald Trump himself, personally and specifically, was in no way named by the Russians in any way as being the “preferred candidate” as the media like to dishonestly claim. Of course since the January 2017 intelligence community assessment, the media got a gift from Vladimir Putin himself when he actually said out loud to the entire world that he preferred Trump over Clinton. Let’s put that hilarious piece of “evidence’ to bed with this excerpt from a related article I recently did…

Since we’re all so interested in Russia these days, I’m gonna let you in on a little secret. The Russians actually have a name for people like you who, for example, eagerly believe that Vladimir Putin would stand in front of television cameras and not use such a potentially toxic question as an opportunity to manipulate you. They call you “useful idiots.” And I’m sorry you had to find out this way, Columbo, but that’s what you’re being when you bring us that laughable piece of “evidence.”

The Russians didn’t “want Trump to win.” They wanted to sow discord and disunity, and the number one weapon they used to do that was the exact same weapon that the Democrats and media use to gain power and win elections: Identity Politics. Of the 3,517 ads that the Russians ran on Facebook, less than 3% even mentioned Trump or Clinton with any specificity. The remaining 97% were largely aimed at stoking identity-based divisions, just as the media and Democrats have spent decades doing every day. The media claim “Russia wanted Trump to win” not just to advance their ongoing attempted coup and to disenfranchise the 75 million or so voters Trump will get in 2020, but also to deflect from the twin realities that would otherwise crush them: 1) Russia has always meddled in our elections and the staggering time, energy and resources spent on the Trump/Russia conspiracy hoax was just a coping mechanism for losing in 2016, and 2) Russia’s latest and greatest efforts to hurt our nation rely on the same techniques that the media and Democrats use to gain power and win elections.

CONCLUSION

I’m sure there are other narratives that I left out (like “He’s literally insane!” which honestly doesn’t even dignify its own response), but these are top-of-mind right now and so easily debunked that I wanted to get them all on paper, in one place. Hope you appreciated this and if you did, please share it across social media so hopefully some of our least favorite media members can choke on it. I’m banned from Twitter but also don’t advertise on this site (it’s through WordPress, and any ads you see are theirs, not mine), so my stuff never gets seen unless you guys share it.

Thanks, and here’s to another great night coming up in 2020 and plenty more traction draining the swamp, putting America First, and helping Make America Great Again!

https://lovebreedsaccountability.com/2019/07/26/debunking-the-medias-top-6-lies-about-president-trump/

[trkyhntr]

Hey, today is the day Nads and shiftless present their overwealming evidence that Trump is guilty of something. Mueller testiclefies. Tune in for the story tomorrow. "Democrats: Where are they now?"

[trkyhntr]

From MSNBC this morning:
https://www.msnbc.com/hardball/watch/new-poll-shows-10-point-spike-in-support-for-impeaching-trump-62124613763

HARDBALL
New poll shows 10 point spike in support for impeaching Trump

A new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll shows a shift in public opinion on impeachment. 27% of Americans now say there is enough evidence to begin impeachment hearings, up 10 points in the last month.

So, if you are MSNBC, what do you focus on? The fact that only27% of Americans think there is enough evidence to impeach Trump, or the fact that this number increased from 17% to 27%? Do you even consider that a majority do not agree with your take on this?

[trkyhntr]

One set of ethical standards for republicans and another set for democrats.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/12/trump-i-think-id-take-damaging-2020-info-rival-from-foreign-agents.html

No problem with Hillary's campaign using damaging information, even faked stuff, but Trump is not allowed to?

[DD]

Ain't that the truth.......

[trkyhntr]

[al44]

REPORT: Hillary Clinton Would Be In Jail Today If Obama DOJ Hadn’t Ordered Stand Down On Investigations

Posted on March 13, 2019 by DCWhispers

Remember that famous presidential debate line by then-candidate Donald Trump when he told Hillary Clinton if he had been in charge during the investigation into her private email server (among other things) that she’d “be in jail”? Well, a breaking report out this week provides some serious substance to the presidential debate boast.

If not for the (improper) protection/intervention of the Obama DOJ, Hillary Clinton would very likely be in jail by now.




Via FOX NEWS:
Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, GOP rep says

Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page admitted under questioning from Texas Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe last summer that “the FBI was ordered by the Obama DOJ not to consider charging Hillary Clinton for gross negligence in the handling of classified information,” the congressman alleged in a social media post late Tuesday, citing a newly unearthed transcript of Page’s closed-door testimony.

Page and since-fired FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok, who were romantically involved, exchanged numerous anti-Trump text messages in the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election, and Republicans have long accused the bureau of political bias. But Page’s testimony was perhaps the most salient evidence yet that the Justice Department improperly interfered with the FBI’s supposedly independent conclusions on Clinton’s criminal culpability, Ratcliffe alleged.

…Responding to the transcript revelations, Trump on Wednesday tweeted: “The just revealed FBI Agent Lisa Page transcripts make the Obama Justice Department look exactly like it was, a broken and corrupt machine. Hopefully, justice will finally be served. Much more to come!”

The just revealed FBI Agent Lisa Page transcripts make the Obama Justice Department look exactly like it was, a broken and corrupt machine. Hopefully, justice will finally be served. Much more to come!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 13, 2019

Federal law states that “gross negligence” in handling the nation’s intelligence can be punished criminally with prison time or fines, and there is no requirement that defendants act intentionally or recklessly.

Originally Comey accused the former secretary of state of being “grossly negligent” in handling classified information in a draft dated May 2, 2016, but that was modified to claim that Clinton had merely been “extremely careless” in a draft dated June 10, 2016.

———————

So, in summary, the Deep State shielded Hillary Clinton from justice while orchestrating a still-ongoing hoax of investigations against President Trump.

That isn’t democracy. That’s centralized, authorititive, and overtly abusive power that continues to attempt a coup of a duly elected President of the United States.

It’s going to be very interesting to see how the Trump administration responds as well as his tens of millions of supporters.

http://dcwhispers.com/report-hillary-clinton-would-be-in-jail-today-if-obama-doj-hadnt-ordered-stand-down-on-investigations/#sRj0HR6KcXGu09Dt.97

[ncj167]

HAHAHAHA That is an instant Classic

[trkyhntr]

Braveheart?

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/885651637741658112/pu/vid/640x360/3j42P0YtBnK81gSd.mp4

[trkyhntr]

[trkyhntr]

[SkeBallLarry]

Ratz .. !!

[trkyhntr]

Snopes says it is fake, Larry.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-blackface-photo/

[SkeBallLarry]

>>>>>>>>

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146832555

[trkyhntr]

There is no way to avoid that, Larry. Getting old and paying taxes are two things one can count on.

[SkeBallLarry]

" Rain ~ rain, temps are tolerable ~ getting ready fer Taxes " .. !! 'n getting Older " .. !!

[trkyhntr]

GM bakatcha, Larry. How are things in your corner of the world?

[SkeBallLarry]

" LOL " .. ~ Good one, George ~ 'n Good Morning to ya " .. !!

[trkyhntr]

[al44]

Curtains for the Clintons…

By Gov't Slaves on 12/01/2018



The snow is falling lightly.

My thoughts are racing darkly.

I’m feeling something foreign, something I’ve never felt before. It takes me a moment to identify it.

I’m feeling sorry for the Clintons.

In the 27 years I’ve covered Bill and Hillary, I’ve experienced a range of emotions. They’ve dazzled me and they’ve disgusted me.

But now they’re mystifying me.

I’m looking around Scotiabank Arena, the home of the Toronto Maple Leafs, and it’s a depressing sight. It’s two-for-the-price-of-one in half the arena. The hockey rink is half curtained off, but even with that, organizers are scrambling at the last minute to cordon off more sections behind thick black curtains, they say due to a lack of sales. I paid $177 weeks in advance. (I passed on the pricey meet-and-greet option.) On the day of the event, some unsold tickets are slashed to single digits.

I get reassigned to another section as the Clintons’ audience space shrinks. But even with all the herding, I’m still looking at large swaths of empty seats — and I cringe at the thought that the Clintons will look out and see that, too. It was only four years ago, after all, that Canadians were clamoring to buy tickets to see the woman who seemed headed for history.

It’s a sad contrast with the sold-out boffo book tour of Michelle Obama, who’s getting a lot more personal for the premium prices. But introspection has never been within the Clintons’ range.

I can’t fathom why the Clintons would make like aging rock stars and go on a tour of Canada and the U.S. at a moment when Democrats are hoping to break the stranglehold of their cloistered, superannuated leadership and exult in a mosaic of exciting new faces.

What is the point? It’s not inspirational. It’s not for charity. They’re not raising awareness about a cause, like Al Gore with global warming. They’re only raising awareness about the Clintons.

It can’t be the money at this point. Have they even spent all the Goldman gold yet? Do they want to swim in their cash like Scrooge McDuck?

The Clintons’ tin cup is worthy of the Smithsonian. They hoovered more than $2 billion in contributions to their campaigns, foundation and philanthropies.

After the White House, the money-grubbing raged on, with the Clintons making over 700 speeches in a 15-year period, blithely unconcerned with any appearance of avarice or of shady special interests and foreign countries buying influence. They stockpiled a whopping $240 million. Even leading up to her 2016 presidential run, Hillary was packing in the speeches, talking to the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, the American Camp Association, eBay, and there was that infamous trifecta of speeches for Goldman Sachs worth $675,000.

“What scares me the most is Hillary’s smug certainty of her own virtue as she has become greedy and how typical that is of so many chic liberals who seem unaware of their own greed,” Charlie Peters, the legendary liberal former editor of The Washington Monthly, told me. “They don’t really face the complicity of what’s happened to the world, how selfish we’ve become and the horrible damage of screwing the workers and causing this resentment that the Republicans found a way of tapping into.” He ruefully worries about the Obamas in this regard, too.

Indeed, in the era of Trump, greed is not only good. It’s grand. The stock market is our highest value. Mammonism rules.

https://govtslaves.info/2018/12/01/curtains-for-the-clintons/

[al44]

USA Today's Reynolds: Africans Being Sold as Slaves in Libya Thanks to Hillary Clinton

Michael W. Chapman
By Michael W. Chapman | November 26, 2018 | 6:23 PM EST
)

In a remarkable column that apparently received little media attention, USA Today Board of Contributors member Glenn Harlan Reynolds analyzed how Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's policy in the Obama administration forced the overthrow of Libya's Moammar Gadhafi, which produced social and political chaos there, the flooding of refugees into Europe, and now the open sale of Africans at slave markets.

"Black Africans are being sold in open-air slave markets, and it’s Hillary Clinton’s fault," wrote Reynolds in the Nov. 27, 2017 column. "But you won’t hear much about that from the news media or the foreign-policy pundits."

Footage of the Africans being sold in Libya as farm workers -- some auctioned at $400 a head -- has been shown on CNN. The BCC has reported that the problems began with the overthrow of Gadafhi in 2011, said Reynolds. Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.

The Obama administration broke off a deal with Libya that George W. Bush had negotiated in 2003, Reynolds reported, and Clinton, backed by President Barack Obama, "spearheaded" the operation to get rid of the military dictator.

But the "overthrow turned out to be a debacle," Reynolds wrote. "Libya exploded into chaos and civil war, and refugees flooded Europe, destabilizing governments there. But at the time, Clinton thought it was a great triumph — 'We came, we saw, he died,' she joked about Gadhafi’s overthrow — and adviser Sidney Blumenthal encouraged her to tout her 'successful strategy' as evidence of her fitness for the highest office in the land."

"Libya, before Clinton got involved, was comparatively stable and no strategic threat to the United States or its allies," said Reynolds. "Now it’s a shambles, with people literally being sold in slave markets."

"Back in the 2012 presidential campaign, Vice President Biden told a group of African Americans that the GOP was going to 'put you all back in chains,'" reported the columnist. "But it turned out that it was Clinton’s policies that led to black people being sold."

Reynolds also stated, "Libya, before Clinton got involved, was comparatively stable and no strategic threat to the United States or its allies. Now it’s a shambles, with people literally being sold in slave markets."

Who knew that the liberal Democrat Hillary Clinton -- "nobody more qualified than Hillary Clinton to serve as president," according to Barack Obama -- would play a vital role in resurrecting the sale of Africans into slavery in the 21st century?

https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/usa-todays-reynolds-africans-being-sold-slaves-libya-thanks-hillary-clinton

[trkyhntr]

CNN: an unbiased source for news. NOT!!!
https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/23/politics/donald-trump-mid-term-election-immigration-ted-cruz/index.html

[NYBob]

7:00 PM EST - WATCH LIVE: President Donald Trump Holds MAGA Rally in Lebanon, OH
10/12/18

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuNVKBRavU4

God Bless America

[mr40]

Border Patrol Agents Bust Truck with Hidden $1.4 Million Cargo at Southern Border



Texas Border Patrol agents apprehended a truck carrying what is believed to be $1.4 million in methamphetamine drugs attempting to enter the United States.

The truck, which was a white Chevrolet, was carrying over a dozen bundles of the contraband drugs.

The vehicle was attempting to enter the United States via a primary inspection lane at the checkpoint on Highway 59 Monday, according to a news release from U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

The same report stated that the drugs were found while agents attempted to ascertain the immigration status of the driver.

At that time, a service canine indicated that it had encountered the odor of something unacceptable on the vehicle. That alert caused the vehicle and its driver to be subject to a secondary inspection, according to CBP’s website.

“While at secondary, agents conducted a closer and thorough inspection of the truck, successively finding 15 bundles concealed within the seats of the truck,” CBP reported.

The statement from Laredo Border Patrol agents didn’t specify whether there was any resistance on the part of the driver after the drugs were found.

They did, however, report that the almost 38 pounds of drugs were seized and given to the proper authorities.

“All bundles were removed from the vehicle and tested positive for methamphetamine. The narcotics, vehicle, and driver were turned over to the Drug Enforcement Administration,” CBP reported.

This interception was similar to the one that took place in Tuscon, Arizona last month where U.S. Customs and Border Protection detained a Mexican national in a failed attempt to smuggle 77 pounds of various drugs through the port of Nogales, according to CBP’s website.

The 36-year-old foreign national was attempting to bring a combination of heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine into the United States in his Chevrolet sedan.

Officers were again, alerted to a potential problem through their canine, and found three packages of cocaine, five packages of heroin and more than 30 packages of meth. The estimated combined value of the drugs was roughly $644,000.

The suspect was arrested and turned over to ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations.

While drug trafficking incidents like these aren’t new occurrences on the southern border, they are part of the problem that President Donald Trump had hoped to remedy with his much-anticipated border wall.

The president campaigned on the promise of building a wall to slow down both drug trafficking and illegal immigration, and later doubled down on that promise, saying that Mexico would foot the bill for the wall.

https://www.westernjournal.com/agents-bust-truck-southern-border/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=patriotupdate&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=libertyalliance

[trkyhntr]

Just in case you had doubts:

[trkyhntr]

And, the funny thing is that in a poll of democrats in Minnesota, only 4% of them believe Ellison's accuser. I thought democrats said that a woman is always supposed to be believed. Isn't that right, Mazie?

[trkyhntr]

[trkyhntr]

I would like to see billboards with this quote on it all over the country.

In a new unbelievable interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) made the claim that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh had “broad credibility issues” and implied that Kavanaugh should not be presumed innocent because of the fact that he is a conservative judge.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/video-democrat-senator-refuses-to-give-kavanaugh-the-presumption-of-innocence/

[ncj167]

hahahhaha.. dam thats the direction were heading in..!!

[trkyhntr]

This just in!

[trkyhntr]

[ncj167]

Things That make u go HMMMMMM

@realDonaldTrump

[trkyhntr]

Christine Blasey-Ford's parents were subject of a forclosure hearing in Montgomery County, MD. Results were that they lost. The judge in the case was Martha G. Kavenaugh. Name sound familiar?

Martha G. Kavanaugh, the mother of Brett Kavanaugh was a Maryland district judge in 1996. In an amazing coincidence, Martha Kavanaugh was the judge in a foreclosure case in which Christine Blasey-Ford’s parents were the defendants. Now it all becomes clear. Blasey-Ford is going after Brett Kavanaugh, not because of what he did in high school. Instead, Christine Blasey-Ford is going after Brett Kavanaugh out of spite and revenge for a case rulled on by Brett Kavanaugh mother. Martha Kavanaugh, Brett’s mother was Montgomery County Circuit Court judge from 1993 until she retired in 2001. During a 1996 foreclosure case, Martha Kavanaugh ruled against the parents of Christine Blasey-Ford in a foreclosure case.
The foreclosure case against Paula K. Blasey and Ralph G. Blasey was opened on August 8, 1996. The case number is 156006V.
Isn’t it kind of amazing that all the media reports today didn’t mention this little conflict of interest for Blasey-Ford?

https://archive.fo/69gvf#selection-511.0-529.122

[pos_stock_hoarder]

What's a Joint Like You Doing in a Nice Girl Like This? by Stilton Jarlsberg

(another classic column!)


"You said a mouthful, honey!"

While not the biggest story currently in the public eye, we were drawn to today's topic because it serves as such an effective reminder of what kind of chaos we'd be experiencing on a daily basis if Hillary Clinton had successfully stolen the Presidency.

In this case, an 11-year-old girl in Baltimore who was inspired by Colin Kaepernick decided to "take the knee" during the Pledge of Allegiance to protest racism (she's white) and sexism (there are no 11-year-old female CEOs) and was told by her teacher that she had to stand. Heroically, the girl responded with tears, hysteria, a memorized recitation of the Supreme Court's "Tinker v. Des Moines" ruling, and an outreach to the local ACLU. You know, the way kids have always done.

Hillary, having nothing better to do with her time these days than encourage tiny little drama queens, tweeted "It takes courage to exercise your right to protest injustice, especially when you're 11! Keep up the good work!"

The Baltimore County Public Schools and the ACLU are now debating how best to deal with students "taking the knee" in protest, and it looks like school kids will likely be allowed - if not actively encouraged - to disrespect the Pledge from now on.

But we can't help but wonder how the school and ACLU will feel the first time a kid in an American flag t-shirt takes the knee to protest the Left's totally unfounded persecution of Trump? Or what if a kid chooses to bend a knee in protest of the illegal immigration which is changing our school systems? Or if we really want to see heads explode, let's watch what happens when a kid kneels to protest the injustice of attacks on 2nd Amendment rights?

Let us be clear: students don't lose their 1st Amendment rights when they enter a school, but that doesn't mean the school can't dictate the proper time, place, and form that expressions of political opinion should take place in order to minimize disruption and maintain appropriate discipline (which is already in short supply in too many school systems).

We'd say that we're disappointed in Hillary's encouragement of this nonsense, but in truth we're not even surprised. This is, after all, a woman who has never taken an actual stand for America...and who can't keep from falling to her knees unless her arms are supported by Secret Service agents.

http://stiltonsplace.blogspot.com/

[ncj167]

On point there!!