Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What Epic Failed investment this was lmfao
This pos is dead lol
At this moment this pos doesnt trade and will never trade...
Hahahaha we were riiiight what an Epic Fail shiiiity shiit stock lol
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 86703 / August 19, 2019
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-19285
In the Matter of chatAND, Inc., DTS8 Coffee Company, Ltd., and
Greenfield Farms Food, Inc.,
Respondents.
ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND
REVOKING REGISTRATION OF
SECURITIES PURSUANT TO
SECTION 12(j) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 AS TO GREENFIELD FARMS FOOD, INC.
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to accept the Offer of Settlement submitted by Greenfield Farms Food, Inc. (“GRAS” or “Respondent”) pursuant to Rule 240(a) of the Rules of
Practice of the Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 201.240(a), for the purpose of settlement of these proceedings initiated against Respondent on July 29, 2019, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”).
II.
Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over it and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Making Findings and Revoking Registration of Securities Pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as to Greenfield Farms Food, Inc. (“Order”), as set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that
1
:
1. GRAS (CIK No. 1440517) is a defaulted Nevada corporation located in
Dallas, Texas with a class of securities registered with the Commission under Exchange Act Section 12(g). As of July 22, 2019, the common stock of GRAS (symbol GRAS) was quoted on OTC Link (formerly Pink Sheets) operated by OTC Markets Inc., had six market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).
2. GRAS has failed to comply with Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Rules
13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder because it has not filed any periodic reports with the Commission since the period ended March 31, 2017.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to impose the sanction specified in Respondent’s Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
Pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Exchange Act, the registration of each class of Respondent’s securities registered pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12 be, and hereby is, revoked. The revocation is effective as of August 20, 2019].
2
For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.
Vanessa A. Countryman Secretary
1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
2 This Order applies to all classes of Respondent’s securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, whether or not such securities are specifically identified by ticker symbol or otherwise in this Order.
It's a good way to offset gains so I don't have to pay capital gains taxes.
I won't be writing off GRAS this year. I have other older dead stocks to write off first.
Yup, That tax write off will be something else, Won’t it?
Right, But in THIS case.... I was right all along
I can say that about every pink stock and get it right 95+% of the time. It's much harder to be right about a pink stock that will make people money.
So I was correct in calling this a "scam" and saying everyone who bought would "lose their money"?
So I was correct in calling this a "scam" and saying everyone who bought would "lose their money"?
Maybe that's why
GRAS registration revoked:
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2019/34-86703.pdf
08/20/2019 08:43:48 12(j)Registration Revoked by SEC 08/20/2019 08:44:00
GRAS
Greenfield Farms Food, Inc. Common Stock
Close to the bottom of the page "in RED"
It’s right there in red....
Otc Where, I do not see how Green Field played in to to what you copied and pasted.
Greenfield Farms went through some issues with debt.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 0:17-cv-62255
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
IBRAHIM ALMAGARBY and
MICROCAP EQUITY GROUP LLC,
Defendants, COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), alleges as follows:
I. INTRODUCTION
1. This case involves the buying of more than $1.1 million of convertible debt of
microcap (i.e., penny stock) issuers and the subsequent selling of more than 7.4 billion shares of
the microcap issuers’ stock into the market by Ibrahim Almagarby and his wholly owned and
controlled business entity, Microcap Equity Group LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), without
either registering with the Commission as a dealer or being associated with an entity that was
registered with the Commission as a dealer.
2. Between January 2013 and July 2016, Defendants, as part of a regular business,
engaged in the buying and selling of securities for Defendants’ own accounts. Defendants
purchased from debtholders the aged debts of various microcap issuers of securities.
Contemporaneously, and as part of their purchase of the aged debt, Defendants obtained
agreements with the issuers permitting Defendants to, at their discretion, convert the debt into
Case 0:17-cv-62255-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2017 Page 1 of 10
2 shares of the issuers’ common stock. Defendants deposited these shares (once converted from
the debt) into their brokerage accounts and sold significant numbers of them into the market.
Finally, Defendants deposited the net proceeds from the stock sales into their bank accounts.
3. Defendants’ gained $1,474,901.63 from selling the shares, which represents the
difference between their known costs of acquiring the convertible debt securities and their net
proceeds obtained from converting the debt into shares and then selling the shares into the
market.
4. By virtue of their conduct, Defendants violated Section 15(a)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78o(a)(1)].
5. Additionally and alternatively, Ibrahim Almagarby is a controlling person of Microcap Equity Group LLC under Exchange Act Section 20(a) [15 U.S.C. § 78t(a)] and
Ibrahim Almagarby is therefore liable for Microcap Equity Group LLC’s violations of Section
15(a)(1).
6. Unless enjoined, Defendants are likely to commit such violations in the future.
Among other relief, Defendants should be enjoined from future violations and should be ordered
to disgorge, with prejudgment interest, any ill-gotten gains obtained as a result of their
violations, and ordered to pay an appropriate civil money penalty.
II. DEFENDANTS
7. Ibrahim Almagarby, age 27, on information and belief, resides in Tamarac,
Florida.
8. Microcap Equity Group LLC is a Florida limited liability company formed on
January 8, 2013, and is wholly owned and controlled by Ibrahim Almagarby. On information
and belief, Microcap’s principal place of business is in Tamarac, Florida.
Case 0:17-cv-62255-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2017 Page 2 of 10
3
III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
9. This Court has jurisdiction under Exchange Act Sections 21(d), 21(e), and 27
[15 U.S.C. § 78u(d), 78u(e), and 78aa]. In connection with the transactions and acts alleged
herein, Defendants, directly or indirectly, made use of the means and instruments of
transportation and communication in interstate commerce and of the mails.
10. Ibrahim Almagarby, during the relevant period, resided in the Southern District of
Florida. Microcap Equity Group LLC is a Florida limited liability company, and certain of the
transactions and acts alleged herein took place in the Southern District of Florida. Venue
therefore is proper in this district under Exchange Act Section 27 [15 U.S.C. § 78aa].
IV. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A. Defendants Bought and Sold Large Volumes of Microcap Issuer Securities as
Part of their Regular Business.
11. Between January 2013 and July 2016, Defendants bought more than $1.1 million of convertible debt of 39 different microcap issuers and subsequently sold more than 7.4 billion
shares of the microcap issuers’ stock into the market.
12. Defendants purchased the convertible debt securities through agreements that
granted Defendants the right to convert the microcap issuers’ debts into shares of the issuers’
common stock. Defendants frequently exercised all or some of their conversion rights soon after
closing on the purchase of the convertible debts and then began selling the resulting shares into
the market using accounts that Defendants maintained at various brokerage firms.
13. Defendants’ buying and selling of securities is illustrated by the following
example:
Case 0:17-cv-62255-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2017 Page 3 of 10
4
a. On or about July 1, 2016, Defendants acquired $20,184.10 in aged debt
issued by Halitron, Inc. (“Halitron”), a microcap issuer. Defendants
negotiated a debt purchase agreement to acquire the aged debt from the
debtholders at face value.
b. Defendants contemporaneously negotiated an agreement with Halitron
whereby Halitron agreed to permit Defendants to immediately convert the
debt into shares of Halitron common stock.
c. On July 6, 2016, Defendants converted the debt into 25,230,125 shares of
Halitron stock and deposited the shares into a brokerage account that
Defendants maintained at a third-party brokerage.
d. Between July 22, 2016 and August 8, 2016, Defendants sold all
25,230,125 Halitron shares into the market generating net proceeds of
$56,177.52 and a net profit of $35,993.42.
14. Between January 2013 and July 2016, Defendants entered into 57 other debt
purchase agreements via which they acquired more than $1.1 million in aged debt convertible
securities from 38 other microcap issuers. Defendants converted the securities into more than
8.9 billion shares of microcap stock, more than 7.4 billion of which they sold into the market,
reaping a gain of $1,474,901.63.
B. Defendants Violated the Federal Securities Laws by Acting as Unregistered
Dealers.
15. Any person engaged in the business of buying and selling securities for such
person’s own account (through a broker or otherwise) must register with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Case 0:17-cv-62255-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2017 Page 4 of 10
5
16. Between January 2013 and July 2016, Defendants bought and sold securities for
their own account as part of a regular business in which they entered into 58 different debt
purchase transactions to purchase convertible debt securities of 39 different issuers of microcap
stock, exercised their conversion rights to obtain more than 8.9 billion shares of microcap stock,
and sold more than 7.4 billion shares of microcap stock into the market, reaping a gain of
$1,474,901.63.
17. Defendants used means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce to buy and sell
securities.
18. Between January 2013 and July 2016, neither Ibrahim Almagarby nor Microcap
Equity Group LLC were registered with the Securities Exchange Commission as dealers.
19. Between January 2013 and July 2016, neither Ibrahim Almagarby nor Microcap
Equity Group LLC were associated with individuals or entities that were registered with the
Securities Exchange Commission as dealers.
C. Defendants Bought and Sold Penny Stocks.
20. At least some of the 7.4 billion microcap shares that Defendants sold did not
meet any of the exceptions from the definition of a “penny stock,” as defined by Exchange Act
Section 3(a)(51) [15 U.S.C. § 78c(a)(51)] and Exchange Act Rule 3a51?1 [17 C.F.R. §
240.3a51?1].
21. Defendants therefore participated in the offering of penny stock by acting as
dealers engaged in the buying and selling of penny stocks.
/
/
/
Case 0:17-cv-62255-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2017 Page 5 of 10
6
COUNT I
Violation of Section 15(a)(1) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(a)(1)]
(Against both Defendants)
22. The Commission re-alleges and incorporates by reference each and every
allegation in paragraphs 1-21, inclusive, as if they were fully set forth herein.
23. By engaging in the conduct described above, Defendants made use of the mails or
other means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce to effect transactions in, or to induce or
to attempt to induce the purchase or sale of securities while not registered with the Commission
as a dealer or when they were not associated with an entity registered with the Commission as a
dealer.
24. By reason of the foregoing, each of the Defendants violated Exchange Act
Section 15(a)(1) [15 U.S.C. § 78o(a)].
25. A violation of Section 15(a)(1) does not require proof of scienter.
COUNT II
Violation, as a Control Person, of Section 15(a)(1) of the Exchange Act
(Against Defendant Almagarby)
26. The Commission re-alleges and incorporates by reference each and every
allegation in paragraphs 1-25, inclusive, as if they were fully set forth herein.
27. During the relevant period, Ibrahim Almagarby was the sole person who owned
and controlled Microcap Equity Group LLC.
28. Under Exchange Act Section 20(a) [15 U.S.C. § 78t(a)], every person who,
directly or indirectly, controls any entity liable under any provision of the Exchange Act or of
any rule or regulation thereunder shall also be liable jointly and severally with and to the same
extent as such controlled entity to any person to whom such controlled person is liable (including
Case 0:17-cv-62255-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2017 Page 6 of 10
7
the Commission), unless the controlling person acted in good faith and did not directly or
indirectly induce the act or acts constituting the violation or cause of action.
29. Ibrahim Almagarby did not act in good faith, and he directly induced the act or
acts constituting Microcap Equity Group LLC’s violations of the Exchange Act.
30. By reason of the foregoing, Ibrahim Almagarby violated Exchange Act Section
15(a)(1) through his control of Microcap Equity Group LLC.
RELIEF REQUESTED
WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court enter a judgment:
I.
Permanent Injunction
Permanently restraining and enjoining Ibrahim Almagarby and Microcap Equity Group
LLC and their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or
participation with Ibrahim Almagarby and Microcap Equity Group LLC who receive notice of
the injunction by personal service or otherwise, from acting as an unregistered dealer in violation
of Exchange Act Section 15(a)(1) [15 U.S.C. § 78o(a)(1)] by using any means or instrumentality
of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, to
effect transactions in, or induce or attempt to induce the purchase or sale of, securities while not
registered with the Commission as a dealer or while not associated with an entity registered with
the Commission as a dealer;
II.
Penny Stock Bar
Permanently restraining and enjoining Ibrahim Almagarby and Microcap Equity Group
LLC from participating in the offering of any penny stock, including engaging in activities with a
Case 0:17-cv-62255-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2017 Page 7 of 10
8
broker, dealer, or issuer for purposes of issuing, trading, or inducing or attempting to induce the
purchase or sale of any penny stock, under Exchange Act Section 21(d)(6) [15 U.S.C. §
78u(d)(6)];
III.
Civil Penalties
Ordering Ibrahim Almagarby and Microcap Equity Group LLC, jointly and severally, to
pay an appropriate civil penalty under Exchange Act Section 21(d)(3) [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)];
IV.
Disgorgement
Ordering Ibrahim Almagarby and Microcap Equity Group LLC, jointly and severally, to
disgorge, with prejudgment interest, all ill-gotten gains derived from the activities set forth in
this Complaint;
V.
Cancellation and Surrender
Ordering Defendant Microcap Equity Group LLC to surrender for cancellation its
remaining shares of stock of, and surrender its remaining conversion rights under the convertible
securities issued by the following issuers: Aluf Holdings, Inc., Axxess Pharma, Inc., Bulova
Technologies Group, Inc., CD International Enterprises, Inc., CUBA Beverage Company,
Daniels Corporate Advisory Company, Inc., Dewmar International BMC, Inc., East Coast
Diversified Corp., Elray Resources, Inc., Energy Revenue America, Inc., Eyes on the Go, Inc.,
Gold & Silver Mining of Nevada, Inc., Gold and GemStone Mining Inc., Green Energy
Enterprises, Inc., Greenfield Farms Food, Inc., Grid Petroleum Corp./ Simlatus Corporation,
Halberd Corporation, Halitron, Inc., Healthnostics, Inc., Healthy & Tasty Brands Corporation
Case 0:17-cv-62255-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2017 Page 8 of 10
9
(a/k/a GRILLiT, Inc.), Hybrid Coating Technologies, Inc., In Ovations Holdings, Inc., Indo
Global Exchange(s) Pte, Ltd., InoLife Technologies, Inc., InternetArray, Inc., Las Vegas
Railway Express, Inc., LIG Assets, Inc., Medical Care Technologies Inc., Mining Global, Inc.,
MyECheck, Inc., Next Galaxy Corp., North American Cannabis Holdings, Inc., PM&E, Inc.,
PotNetwork Holdings Inc., PPJ Healthcare Enterprises, Inc., Quasar Aerospace Industries, Inc.,
Sanomedics, Inc., Seven Arts Entertainment, Inc., and Urban Ag Corp.
VI.
Retention of Jurisdiction
Retaining jurisdiction of this action in accordance with the principles of equity and the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in order to implement and carry out the terms of all orders and
decrees that may be entered, or to entertain any suitable application or motion for additional
relief within the jurisdiction of this Court; and,
VII.
Further Relief
Granting such other and further relief as this Court may deem just, equitable, or necessary
in connection with the enforcement of the federal securities laws and for the protection of
investors.
/
/
/
/
/
/
Case 0:17-cv-62255-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2017 Page 9 of 10
10
DATED November 17, 2017 Respectfully submitted,
By:
____________
Amy J. Oliver
Trial Counsel
Florida Special Bar No. A5502307
Direct Dial: (801) 524-6748
E-mail: olivera@sec.gov
Lead Attorney
Attorney To Be Noticed
Daniel J. Wadley
Trial Counsel
Florida Special Bar No. A5502306
Direct Dial: (801) 524-3422
wadleyd@sec.gov
Lead Attorney
Attorney To Be Noticed
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
351 South West Temple, Suite 6.100
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1950
LIB* looks like no bid soon as well.
Tough break for some of the holders here.
Management may keep updating financials. Why not? We will see soon.
This is going to the greys. Impossible to sell this shell.
The owners of the shell will have a hard time selling it in this condition.
They did, I knew it was coming... No one wanted to heed the warnings though... Now they can enjoy their tax write offs lmmfao
If there was a scam stock awards show each year Greenfield Farms Food Inc. aka GRAS would be a front runner every year. This piece of crap deserved this trading suspension and delisting to the grey sheets.
Thanks to GRAS and Carebourn LIBE is clean an about to be a winner IMHO
GRAS is a shell not so clean and without a management or a lawyer, and a mess of paper that is too expensive to sort out and trace. The owners of the shell will have a hard time selling it in this condition.
Get ready. The libe deal will not happen. Those who lost, and bought because of a 8-k, then GRAS let THE DEAL GO. LAW SUIT.
BIRDS OF A FEATHER, FLOCK TOGETHER. libe$.
"Lawsuits"? It'll be thrown out.... Just like the one against these clowns before lol
Investors bought in because of NGEN.
Then there's a slit. I smell law suits. It will never happen.
There has to be consideration.
All I can say is a tax write off for next tax season. GLTU!
Sounds like NGEN is abandoning the sinking GRAS ship and hopping over to the LIBE ship. LIBE looks like junk. The only positive thing there is that it's current with their periodic reports.
Game over.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1503161/000149315219011805/form8-k.htm
This might help shed some light as to what might be going on.
To bad, Their suspended... And headed to the greys once the suspension is over, Game over here
According to the SEC, GRAS never even received the delinquency letter that was sent to them over a year ago on July 9, 2018.