Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No, the SEC doesn't get involved "quick" and likely won't at all, even when the stock sale is over and the bagholders are left in the wake of the dump wondering why they haven't heard from the company. The SEC isn't actively policing the OTC, if they were it would be shut down completely.
No matter how many times an attempt is made to slap "opinion" on the cold, hard, common sense that it takes way more money than $16k and way more time than a couple months to even launch research on an EV battery, much less produce one, it remains absurd to even suggest this company's claims can be even remotely legitimate.
Thank you for compiling that information and giving us your opinion of what it all means.
I'll welcome ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION that supports your claims, but apparently none exists. Surely if the scam is so huge, there must be dozens or hundreds of people speaking out in support of your fraud theory and trying to raise awareness. Where are the physicists and scientists, the industry experts, the whistle blowers, the litigation hungry lawyers, and the defrauded shareholders rallying to expose the deception? Please post the corroborating documentation from all of the other sources who support your opinions.
If a company makes an outright false claim and illegally inflates the stock price to multiple dollars, the SEC takes notice and gets involved quick. Just because they pay less attention to the trips and subs stocks being manipulated does not mean they turn a blind eye on the entire market.
GWSO is one of the biggest stories on the entire OTC right now. There is no way the SEC would let them continue to trade if it was a fraud.
And, once again, the development of a successful EV battery takes way longer than 2 months and a ton more money than $16K, and it is preposterous to even suggest that because a pump and dump's PPS went up and the SEC hasn't shut down a non-reporting stinky pink company that it is somehow legit.
The SEC doesn't patrol the OTC, they couldn't possibly come close to doing that. That's why these scams live on and the pump and dumps happen. The claims on this one are nothing short of laughable.
The documents are there, all submitted by the company, financial reports showing the condition of the business and the things they were claiming to do. All that need be done is applying an ounce of common sense.
Where is your proof that the company's PR's are pump and dumps? You are stating your own personal opinion, which is fine, but there is no supporting documentation to quantify that opinion.
Find me some supporting documentation that upholds your claims. Otherwise I will continue to agree with the stock market, the EV power market, the physics community, the CEO, and the SEC that the information presented by GWSO is accurate.
Everybody that has spent any time on the OTC at all knows that the SEC hardly polices it at all and that 99% of the companies are complete scams. Despite the ridiculous efforts to "turn the tables" here into "you have to prove the company's claims are false," a company that had no cash and nothing by way of even research into batteries ongoing as of a couple of months ago has to prove it went from 0 to brand new battery in less than 2 months with $16k cash. Got any proof of that besides the company's own pump and dump PR's? Nope
Thank you for posting your opinions and personal interpretation of this company.
If you would post some corroborating documentation other than your own analysis of company information and undertakings, I would be more inclined to look into the claims. There is no technical data, no third party verification, and no other personal opinions that I can find to support your claims.
I personally cannot uphold the notion that the company, CEO and a couple of sneaky note holders perpetrated such a colossal fraud, and continue with this felonious undertaking, as they intentionally fool the market into buying worthless shares using fake news about false technology....all without attracting the attention of the SEC. I need something more than an opinion of one person to take such claims seriously.
The people you are accusing would be in handcuffs already if what you claim is true.
Oh, please...
I have the company's own documentation of their business and financial condition.
Here's end of September, submitted on 11/25:
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/264945/content
Note that, of the 6 BS projects they mention, none of them have a single thing to do with batteries, EV's, or anything of the sort. No mention of that "subsidiary" in the BS PR, either. Do note the convertible notes that turned $29k of debt into 2.9M shares of stock worth... what, today? Page 3 for that.
Here's their financial condition:
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/264414/content
$16k in cash. That's it. Takes megamillions to move battery tech research forward, yet, somehow, this company made it happen on $16K.
Sorry, that's absurd. This is about selling stock.
All I am seeing you provide is your own personal opinions.
What qualifies you to claim that these technology achievements are an impossibility? Have you had an extensive physics background, or been exposed to numerous alternative battery technologies? Have you ever worked in the EV power industry?
Do you hold any documentation that would make your opinions hold more weight than a layperson outside of the industry?
The company has made a claim that is unsupported by the facts of their own financial condition and business documented in their financial reports. That table cannot be turned around to "prove the claims of a brandy new battery developed with no capital and within 2 months isn't true." That is truly absurd.
You are still saying the same thing and providing none of the documentation needed to back up your claims.
What other information do you have, other than your personal opinion, that supports your claim(s) that the technology and company is "hogwash"?
IMO absurd is when a claim is made with no supporting documentation. I have listened to your claims, now please provide the documentation.
Please answer the questions:
And I would like to see 3rd party documentation that proves that a company can go from absolutely nothing, no research whatsoever, to having a ground breaking EV battery in less than 2 months. The existence of the technology has to be proven, that's the claim that has been made. It takes years and a mountain of cash to even do the research for failure, this company hasn't done it in 2 months with an empty bank account.
That's absurd to even consider.
Again, can you provide current documentation that proves the technology is false?
Referencing the company's past research, quarterly reports, and share exchanges does not provide any information relevant to my question. I have been reading your posts and I am aware of your observations and claims. Is there any concrete evidence, aside from the company information you've presented, to corroborate your claims?
I would like to see actual 3rd party documentation that proves the technology is false. Can you provide anything like that?
Can you document any instances of investors filing complaints with the SEC regarding false GWSO technology?
Once again, this company had zero battery research going on and zero cash to do any with as of the report date of their last quarterly report, middle of November. Nothing going on whatsoever, and you don't go from zero to brand new battery in 2 months, period.
When a penny stock moves to $3+, you can bet the SEC takes notice.
If the technology was false, there would be countless stories outlining how and why it was false, plus there would be hoards of investors filing complaints with the SEC.
Can you provide documentation that the technology is false, or is it speculation based on the perceived share selling scheme?
The SEC polices very few OTC pump and dumps, especially those that are non-reporting, comparing their claims to reality. Everybody knows that, it's the only way the OTC even survives.
If this technology was false, the SEC would have shut this ticker down long ago.
The SEC will check out stories like this and if they find inconsistencies, they suspend the ticker.
Companies get suspended all the time for making false claims and releasing false information to the public.
There is no way the SEC would let GWSO trade all the way over $3 and continue to trade in the $2 area if the technology was false.
That's funny. They don't have any of those markets fooled. I guess if there was any validity to the claim that a stinky pink company with no cash and absolutely nothing going on with respect to battery research less than two months ago had somehow hit it out of the park, there'd be more news about it other than the company tossing PR's to help sell stock.
I guess they have the entire stock, battery, and EV markets fooled.
I would think there would be more reports discrediting the technology if it's the farce you claim it is.
No, they didn't invent anything. As of the report date of the last quarterly they published, they had zero research in battery technology going on, and they sure don't have any cash to do any of that (or anything else) with.
I wonder what they thought of the person who invented the deer call. "Yep, just sit in a tree and blow this horn and the deer will come to you". They must have thought he was off his rocker!
But the invention worked, and as more people became aware of it, it changed hunting forever and ultimately became one of the most used products in hunting history. The inventor, and some of his business partners probably made a lot of money off of the idea.
How does the deer call relate to GWSO?
GWSO's invention can potentially change battery technology forever, but it's not fully understood yet because the technology is so new and ground breaking. So naturally some people will question the validity of the tech.
The inventor and his business partners will make a lot of money as a result of this technology.
Yes, people involved with GWSO will make money. I don't know why that is such an extreme problem, it's just normal business. This is a company who has developed a market disrupting technology, the people involved deserve to make money.
Hogwash pump and dump.
Here’s their end of September quarterly report, issued on November 25 with a “Subsequent Events” section for anything material that occurred up to the report date:
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/264945/content
There is NOTHING mentioned about battery research, NOTHING mentioned about EV’s, NOTHING about a subsidiary called Alternata motors. ZILCH.
What there is mention of is 2.9M shares issued for a penny a share.
Here’s their financial report ending September:
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/264414/content
It shows $16.7k in cash. So, somehow, this company has had a miracle occur, going from zero to battery research and zero to EV company on 16 thousand dollars in a month.
Somebody is selling stock, and this is a pump and dump
That’s laughable.
SPAC’s are separate companies selling separate stock to later acquire a target company. The stock sold is unique and not tied to another company and its stock. Yet another pump, a bait and switch, so that insiders and front loaders can stir up some liquidity and dump their holdings.
Please stay under $2s for one more week .
Float 3.7M os 19M, and this my favorite part, The company reached an agreement with creditors that will completely eliminate the debt in the amount of $527,000 owed to them by the Company. The Company won’t issue any shares to the debt holders under the terms of this agreement.
This is the second major improvement to the company’s Balance Sheet since November 2020. In November, the Company’s CEO Vladimir Vasilenko canceled 12 million of his shares representing approximately a 30% increase in shareholder value.
Vladimir Vasilenko stated, “This is the best position the Company has been in. With the share cancellation and debt elimination, we have reversed any potential for shareholder dilution. With the capital structure simplified it creates material value for the Company’s shareholders and positions the Company to take advantage of future organic M&A opportunities.”
$GWSO, Tesla will love something like this, The first results we are seeing in our laboratory tests of new electrochemical cells are very encouraging,” says Artem Madatov, GWSO chief scientist. Calculations based on measurements of the cell characteristics showed a battery capacity of 8 MJ / kg. This means that with a battery weight of 300 kg (661 lbs.), a light truck can travel for about 750 miles on a single charge. Another important feature of our battery is the absence of the so-called “memory effect.” E.g.; during long-term operation of the battery, its electrical capacity does not decrease. Durability of the cathode and anode will allow recharging the battery about 2000 times. Thus, operating an EV for 1,500,000 miles will not require a battery change .
$GWSO The company’s approach in developing a new type of battery used in EV will be based on sodium as an active material in the battery anodes versus lithium which is more commonly used. Sodium has a number of advantages over lithium e.g.; resources for its production are immeasurably larger and its price on the market is ten times lower than that of lithium. In addition, the battery cathode does not contain scarce cobalt. This opens up opportunities for rapid growth in both development, and battery production for electric vehicles by costing much less than usual.
$GWSO GLOBAL WARMING SOLUTIONS UPDATE ON PATENT APPLICATION FOR PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN AND ELECTRIC ENERGY DURING MOVEMENT OF VEHICLE
Press Release | 01/07/2021
Jacksonville, Fl, Jan. 07, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Global Warming Solutions Inc. (OTC MARKET: GWSO), a developer of technologies aimed at mitigating the effects of global warming, is elated to announce that it has completed a patent search related to one of its newest inventions. The research has indicated that there is an invention under the Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (Contract No. DEA CO 51D14517) between "Alberta Ltd.." and "Battelle Energy Alliance,” and it was approved by the U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Patent US2011135565. The result of this finding is proof and is adding to our conviction that our invention will receive USPTA patent approval in the U.S
The GWSO research team has developed their own mobile system for the production of hydrogen and electric energy during the movement of automobiles. Our system is more suitable for vehicular applications as it recovers metal sodium produced by means of circulating electrical current. It is also producing hydrogen or electricity in the same device during movement of a vehicle.
Due to our substantially new design, we are able to use the energy of sodium which is twice as productive and provides twice as much range, compare to an invention covered in U.S. Patent US2011135565 The company’s invention can be upgraded for obtaining all energy in automobiles exclusively in the form of hydrogen or only in the form of electrical energy. This opens up opportunities for the production of a wide range of vehicles including heavy trucks and cargo ships, small cars and scooters.
The Company is working with a patent agency and will file a patent application in the upcoming weeks.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release may include predictions, estimates or other information that might be considered forward-looking within the meaning of applicable securities laws. While these forward-looking statements represent the Company’s current judgments, they are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the Company’s management only as of the date of this release. Please keep in mind that the Company is not obligating itself to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements in light of new information or future events. When used herein, words such as: potential, expect, look forward, believe, dedicated, building, or variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in any forward-looking statements made by the Company herein are often discussed in filings the Company makes with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) available at www.sec.gov and on the Company’s website at https://www.gwsogroup.com.
Contact:
Vladimir Vasilenko
CEO
Global Warming Solutions, Inc.
Vladimir@gwsogroup.com
$GWSO https://www.gwsogroup.com/hydrogen-energy-storage-solutions/ Wind and solar power are renewable sources of power generation offering a viable solution to reducing our carbon footprint and increasing our energy supply. But because wind and solar power are intermittent, other energy resources are needed to help with electricity supply and load demand throughout the day.
Hogwash pump and dump.
Here’s their end of September quarterly report, issued on November 25 with a “Subsequent Events” section for anything material that occurred up to the report date:
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/264945/content
There is NOTHING mentioned about battery research, NOTHING mentioned about EV’s, NOTHING about a subsidiary called Alternata motors. ZILCH.
What there is mention of is 2.9M shares issued for a penny a share.
Here’s their financial report ending September:
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/264414/content
It shows $16.7k in cash. So, somehow, this company has had a miracle occur, going from zero to battery research and zero to EV company on 16 thousand dollars in a month.
Somebody is selling stock, and this is a pump and dump.
$GWSO WILL RUN TO $5 $10 $15 THIS YEAR .
$GWSO - news on a new office and new patent application is coming shortly! Another idea for the management team, to sell certain products for the EV market.
I don't how grammar got thrown so off badly in that last message. Good ol auto correct and poor editing...Anyhoo seems like you got the jist. Curious how flagrantly they r converting. From the dates of original debts, it seems they have patience. Are they patient enough to keep running it?
With that name, I'm sure they are happy Biden won!