Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm not the company soooooo another nonsensical twist attempt..talking about longs duh
Lol this is to hilarious, like watching someone dig their own grave.
Ding dong... Alps was NEVER short. All stock they sell is long, sitting in DTC ,fully cleared. They are not permitted to do margin. Their membership agreement permits it but their clearing bank (im sure you have no idea what i am saying) will not allow ANY margin of these stocks. to short you need margin accounts. Alps simply sold too much of a long GTII position in one day... Please tell me you don't still think this is an issue? if so.... why is the stock a .50 center????
How could it be about the money? the company has not had any revenue in 3 years... not profits, REVENUES,,,What do they do/sell/manufacture? and how is that Water deal and A.I. deal looking?
Agree..also amazing the sides some pick to defend as if nobody notices. They also don't understand for many in GTII its not about the $$$.
Isn't it amazing how obvious the criminality is, this life is wild. Lord have mercy on us...
Lol he's still mixing together different/incorrect actions and not discussing properly what came out last fall in the totally separate action where it's clearly states the "concentrated net short position in GTII" was the cause of Alpine backtesting charge deficiencies...then gets it stickied somehow? Laughable
It doesn't matter if the charge goes away. Nakeds are rarely in plain sight. You'll see what I mean soon. As for the GTII case not sure what you mean by "release Cannacord" after case was filed there were several extensions to the timeframe the MM's would have had to answer the complaint. Typically when extensions happen it means they're negotiating. If this wasn't true then they would have immediately answered and or filed a motion to dismiss the case. They did not. So not responding with an answer to the complaint is not what you think. As for the Alpine original PR I think it's safe to say that counsel knew what was coming from FINRA and the Wells notice and decided they'd let FINRA try first. And if you look up Rule 11(as mentioned at the bottom of the dismissal) you can get a clue as to whether your "fictitious" suit claim would be accurate
Lol so passionate over this matter, he doth protest to much indeed.
There is no more GTII special charge against Alpine... get it through your skull. Even if you continue to claim there is, i would not matter, the cap requirements changed!! Why don't you focus on little things like...Why did GTII release and drop Canaccord from its suit (they released Alpine 24 hours after naming them but you keep dreaming and avoiding that question) ? More importantly, Canaccord didn't even RESPOND...In other words their legal told GTII counsel...we are going to crush you like a worm on the sidewalk for this fictitious suit AND will demand immediate testimony and proof. OOps!
You still don't want to admit you made a mistake by thinking this recent decision was the Nov 22 one. Ok let's get back on topic. Of 130Ish OTC stocks Alpine touched the Main driver of the more recent Backtesting Charge was a "concentrated net short postion in GTII" if you break those words down we get "net short" meaning they didn't have the long shares to cover this substantial short position. We know what the real short was and we all saw the FTD's(yes we known they arent culmulitive) and shocker the math doesnt add up. We also know Alpine used one sided offers(one of a few ways to NS) which is NOT acting as a bona fide market maker etc etc...if that more recent issue were moot then they wouldn't keep kicking down the road(wjy would they do that? Are other agencies involved now?). The water deal is the water deal??? They take time and would a prospective deal partner want more $$ or less? Because it would be paid for in restricted shares. It didn't say in the report the water deal was off(like was mentioned with 1-800 deal) I also think you should DEFINITELY keep saying things like "you don't get it" and "I know you don't understand this" it REALLY shows how smart you are and makes people believe you LMFAO
I am the B/S man? i guess its time to report news from 2021/22? SEC letter from '22? 300 million shares short? what have i said that is not true and does the stock price reflect my opinion or this naked short fairy tale over the last 9 months?? Don't worry any day now revenues will occur. Most likely from the numerous companies they acquired. I want you to make a promise here and now and honor your word ok? When the lawyers come out en masse suing, will you promise here and now that you will not seek any recovery from them or be part of the class action against the company since you believe so strongly?
AS said to you before u never stop the bullshit man can you just shut up few few second PAID BASHER no doubt didn't know where u pup from ?????????????????
You still don't get it? first, Alpine paid a $12 million fine to SEC (look it up) ..they paid monthly $1 million installments. Under FINRA rules they should have accrued liability of at least 6% of that amount against its capital but FINRA can make you put up more. Instead they used a different tactic and used creative accounting to avoid putting that amount up (real estate i believe) and AFTER making 12 months of payments, FINRA came in and said "You should have put up $$ for the accrued part" and made them resubmit 12 months of focus and an annual report.. I know you have zero idea what i am talking about. The one time charge is already moot.. the $$ they put up was returned but like the judge said "It's moot" at this point because even if we assume they did not get the $$ back(because you said so) the new DTC requirements basically tripled the amount they would have to put up under your GTII scam... But i again ask: Where is this Boca Del Vista Water company? they didn't mention it in their report yesterday...that showed YET AGAIN ZERO REVENUES...homeless guys at the intersection selling flowers daily have more revenue...ZERO revenue... Head for NOTE 7.
All you need are real Shares to play this game. Pretty simple. My shares are paid for are yours. Secrit service isn't going to be investigating me.
You're not explaining anything to ME lol...as I don't need it. Point is you thought the last decision was the more recent backtesting issue and it was not. While we are talking about it though you do understand that in the Nov 22 action that Alpine’s audit report was not accurate. They did not correctly calculate their net capital correctly and they tried to use an add back for the liability? Seems they should know this stuff huh??? Lol
As for the deals it seems you are trying to make it seem as if they weren't real which is mot the case. If you read the filings you will see what was said about 1-800-law firm i.e Wildfire Media. CRTD deal was pulled back and all you have to do is see where the new ticker name of that company is now trading(VOCL) as compared to GTII. GTII court case is still going as expected. Speaking of that case it contains proof of manipulation form a trusted source of the court. If you have a company with a manipulated stock price it makes it difficult to do deals with other entities as GTII more than likely would use restricted stock to fund the deals at least in part.
Don't write checks you can't cash mine all, cleard the bank
It's not about fundamentals. All that is needed is a stock greedy pig naked shorting and an army of retail investors
Let's see who wins
Nah...they will always listen
OK... i have already explained this to you several times. but once again the point is MOOT.. DTC increased its required capital requirement by more than that amount anyway. bu don't listen to me...listen to Ham and friends as they reprint '22 news as we approach '24...Once again: How is that 'Del Boco Vista Water deal LOI" from 6 months ago progressing? Has 1-800- Lawyer launched? Wildfire media? Created? Financials are due soon... if they show ZERO again will you continue this in public much longer? more importantly...where is the '24-0" world wide Wes? SMH...
At some point, you will realize that no one is listening... or believing...
Endless repetition of conspiracy theories won't make them true!
🦜
Uh... That is from Oct 16th and was a "contributor post"...
Note: The article linked below is archived and not available from the below link. However, the link is provided to confirm the date of the article, which it does.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2022-10-16/newest-amc-meme-stocks-fngr-gtii-squeezing-shorts
These conspiracy theories lose more believers every day!
About time @zerohedge got loud.$gTii $FNGR https://t.co/617TtYyTix pic.twitter.com/vvH5I346zH
— 🦉🐝 (@ItsStillMeAlby) November 12, 2023
So of course no mention that you acted as if that was the most recent NSCC case when it wasn't? Lol ok got it. And you have zero clue that any of what you just claimed happened as you are not privy to ANY of it. Still waiting for proof that the Backtesting Charge was "wired back to Alpine" by the way which you don't have. Thanks for playing though
Mentioned several times here already...BY THE COURTS.They know its legitimate.Has been used in multiple cases that were settled.
...So this proves my posts from long ago when i said " They already sent the liquidity hit $$ back" In his video he states that doesn't he? and the reason its all "Moot now" is that DTC capital requirements went into effect on 10/24. thus, Alps has to put up millions more anyone just to conduct business... there is no there there.. All the $$ they previously received back , has to be put forth anyway. So YOUR guy who you trust and post is saying I was right all along ...can you admit that?
SMH... how many times did you read the word 'Moot" in that decision? the same thing will apply.. its all moot now because 1) they (Alpine) received the $$ back and 2) the new DTC capital requirement forced Alpine to put and leave in DTC millions more $$ anyway. ($5 million for self clearing, $10 million for correspondent clearing)... Ask your God Ham, he knows he has taken you on a ride down a rabbit hole. But he sure got a lot of viewers and followers like you. and can make $$ advertising.
CNN... the trusted name in news.... Remember they debunked the Hunter Biden Laptop story as 'Russian misinformation" and reported "ground breaking news on Trump - Russia collusion" and the end was near.
The evidence of stock manipulation(spoofing) is already on the record for GTII and that cannot be denied.(but why do this for a crap company with no NS'?) Shareintel data is 1 of 2 trusted sources acceptable as evidence and it shows multiple spoofing events. The point of that data is to seek discovery. It easy to say things don't "exist" when they are buried, offshore etc. ANY American should be pissed as this affects them and their families..period
You don't need to be a rocket scientist to see what's going on here
At some point these dummies will realize that no one believes them no matter how loud they scream or how many trucks they drive around!
Evidence, not accusations can make believers!
🤡
$FNGR $gtii $mmtlp @FinancialCmte pic.twitter.com/VZ2TDwWZNk
— William P. Farrand (@WilliamPFarran1) September 15, 2023
There is no confusion... if what you claimed were true, it would be obvious who is the bad guy!
The problem is that you guys are conspiracy theorists, and your *proof* is following an imaginary trail that you have created yourselves...
Ask yourself why no one credible believes your theories? Of course, your answer will be that EVERYONE is in on it!
Dude... THINK!
I think there's definitely confusion on who wears the black hats and who wears the white ones.
Once again FACTS are important. This recent Alpine decision posted was from the original application for review the FIRST time Alpine apealed the new backtesting policies NOT the most recent one involving GTII.This is the one filed Dec 2018 and may explain why they kicked the can on the more recent one from last fall since it's a similar argument. Surprised with the "intimate" knowledge espoused of NSCC/DTCC etc people don't read or pay attention LMAO WOW!
so once again you and others post the same fairy tale about DTC/Alps and how once that decision came down it was over for Alpine and the naked shorts...Every week a post from Oct 22 came out and every month you all have waited with baited breath for the SEC decision to come out and that was going to make the stock soar..Despite me telling you and others it was a 'Moot Point" for months, despite the fact that that Oct 22 letter must have been posted 40 times and you all criticized the SEC for dragging its point and despite the fact that in the SEC decision you posted they use the word "Moot" several times... You now want me to get on a call with promoters? The real question is WHY do you continue following these guys and why are you not FURIOUS that over a year later, decision in hand...Stock is down? I didn't have the heart to tell you this but read the dates...that SEC letter was well before the GTII you know that? It was an appeal of DTC assessments. And the special assessment from Oct 22 was already decided by Alps putting the $$ up and money being returned. you know that right? please tell me you do?
Both of them actually worked in the industry, the people you argue with on ihub you don't even know their credentials.
That makes no sense, aren't you doing that on ihub everyday?
Look at the picture in the post...
Followers
|
146
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
7534
|
Created
|
09/21/06
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators Stock_Barber Hummingbird2 StayHumble |
$DBMM -1
Source:https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-event-11.pdf
LaidLaw Energy Group Inc (same Link) -6
Bederra Corp -7
Source: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sec-pennystock-settlement/new-york-penny-stock-financier-settles-sec-charges-idUSBRE9AO11420131125
SpartaCo alleges -8
VVG|KBM|Asher|Toxic Debt Loans around the country
Defendant Seth Kramer is President of KBM |
Defendant Curt Kramer is President of Asher and VVG
Source: https://casetext.com/case/sparta-commercial-servs-inc-v-vis-vires-grp-inc
$DBMM $HPIL $GTII HUD $VNUE
Any more?Asking for a Friend
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |