Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Mosquitoes and now crickets sullying themselves.
You may put a smile on Kings face but your continuous barrage of links convince no one.
Kindly excuse yourself from this board and find a place where something you post is helpful to others.
You've wasted our time with those ineffective links and should be embarrassed by the results they've gotten.
Please go.
Just getting started
https://www.h2-view.com/story/california-launches-53m-hydrogen-truck-project-in-bay-area/2109627.article/
https://www.h2-view.com/story/fce-and-toyota-tri-gen-project-officially-opened-in-port-of-long-beach/2109600.article/
C02 just getting started with another $500M
https://t.co/KFe2iWh1Ur
Open funding opportunities update, $$$ being allocated
https://t.co/3aBYqiFhy7
100MW in Ukraine and FCE recently announced 1 project in Ukraine already
https://www.h2-view.com/story/uk-government-funds-100mw-electrolysis-project-in-ukraine/2109666.article/?
Class act! Please leave. Comments are factually inaccurate, crass and unacceptable
Theoretically, a company will sell shares at a high price, for the overall benefit of the company and shareholders. They may even release news or other things to drive the price up beforehand.
Realistically, many companies will do the exact opposite. That is, they sell shares at the absolute lowest price. The existing shareholders are hurt but those large insiders who are allowed to buy the free/cheap shares benefit.
Another Contrary Indicator at work.
They make a call and it goes the opposite way.
One of the best technical Indicators I use.
Abit too drastic. Why not just fire him and get a real leader in there.
600 employees choking the life out on LONGS with expenses .All while dumping shares at low prices to pay those ernployees.
Listen to nothing by a couple of pushers here. Follow what the market has been screaming out for 3 years.
"I think we stay above 0.90 today."
wow...that lasted about a minute before it was proven wrong...
lmao
They have as many as 500,000,000 shares authorized. They've undoubedly sold some into the market already.Additionally, they just added $13 million in debt financing for their Derby project at high interest rates.
The question I'd have why are they so willing to depress the sh/ px at such low prices by selling into it to raise cash. Seems to me Expenses are eating into cash with insufficent revenues to offset it.
If they had sufficent cash on hand and any degree of confidence in their near and long term growth, wouldn't it be prudent to wait for the stock to appreciate,& raise cash at more favorable terms.
What you're hearing from certain board promoters is flowery statement about coming projects, increases in revenues , and a closing inon a profit.
Don't listen to any of it.It's all promotional guess work with no basis in fact.
killing few is the best thing to do
600 employees for nothing
Hydrogen carbon capture this company has no future any poor contract generates huge losses
hope fex and his family soon die
It's being manipulated up a penny. Damn those scalpers. LOL
Moving right along! I think we stay above 0.90 today. Up 7%.!
I am neither of those; a momentum trader instead.
I dont “hold” anything very long since the entire market is smoke and mirrors and a card house falling.
Blessings of Christ all!
GL
It sounds like between the pumper and the dumper the dumper is the winner 🥇
How many shares are they going to sell. The least they could do is give us a heads up about why since they don't seem to be short cash. Especially at these prices.
BIG NEWS❗ 📣: $500M in funding is available to support transporting captured CO2 from industrial operations, power generation, and directly from the atmosphere to permanent storage locations or for conversion to useful products. ➡️ https://t.co/ru3c1IF64n #JustAnnounced pic.twitter.com/iRSJmY8rtA
— DOE Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (@FECMgov) May 2, 2024
Buying opportunity. IMO. The scare tactic that this stock is going to 0.50 is not working. This company is growing. All companies have growing pains. Buy low and wait. Q2 coming soon. Do not be scared out of your shares by posters who have a weird agenda. Analysts predict $1-1.48 without really understanding the dynamics of growth. A positive surprise report forces a short squeeze. Buy and hold makes it harder for shorts to cover and drives up price. Longs are smart. 1.48 is 70% gain from here.
There's much to learn grasshopper.
This is a good start.
https://www.dummies.com/book/business-careers-money/personal-finance/investing/general-investing/investing-for-dummies-9th-edition-282306/
Not really sure why you are going on about Enron, shorters and other nonsense…
There are shorters because fcel is a poorly run company that has been in a 3 yr downtrend…shorters make money on a stock that is going down…there is nothing dastardly or deceitful about it…
As for dilution, it is helping shorters do their thing…the company is diluting gifting shorters the means to profit…
But why bother with shorters?…because it helps divert attention away from the real problem perhaps?…and the problem becomes very obvious when looking at a 3 yr chart…a steady consistent drop from 12 bucks to 85 cents…despite thousands of links to buttloads of articles and posts calling for meteoric rises and vilifying shorters and crying about manipulation…
The fact is that fcel is a very poorly run business…it’s that simple…
And now there are tons of shares are being sold by the company that will dilute shareholder value…sure shorters are taking advantage of that situation…but it’s the company selling shares that is the problem…
Never used the phrase imminent. More like possible and it still is.
But hey; it'll be a bargain supreme. Wait and load up.
Dig that hole deeper. You seem to enjoy it.
If you're happy with $1.48 after having bought at higher levels, it doesn't take much to make you happy. Even the huge losses you bought puts a smile on your face.
Having bought shares at multiple levels higher, and you're elated if it ever gets to $1.48 again ???
You're truly comedic.
If the "analysts" are correct then 1.48 is a 70% increase in the current share price of 0.86 cents. I would not turn that down.
So for every 0.86 cents I invest, the "analysts" say I will get my investment plus 0.60 cents? I think by 2nd quarter we are near $2. How does that look for a return on your $? (minus taxes if course😂) Not investment advice or an inducement to buy sell or try to scare others out of their shares.
Not even news can move this POS. Down 5%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a joke.
Very well put Dubster! All anyone has to do is look at Hopesters' post # 59310 not long ago to see he definitely said $0.50 was imminent. Hasn't materialized. The only thing coming from his court is negativity.
You know folks can see all of your other posts right?
You post nothingness and no where else.
You post nothing, trade nothing, add nothing, but I guess have hope that the position you took here long ago rescues you someday! I have been around the sad little iHub long enough to spot those that fail. The “investment” you must have made here long ago, wrecked you.
Hang in there. Eventually you will learn manners and maybe how to be successful instead of the wickedness.
The 3 blind mice are bragging now that they bought shares at a low price here.
The only reason they would post and announce that is they're seeking affirmation that they did the right thing.
What that means to me is, they really don't have the confidence in their purchase and need other fellow Bulls to affirm it.
Can't give you a target low. The avg px analyst have on it is $1.48 with the low of $1.00.
According to Peter Lynch ( highly respected on Wall Street) his formula says FCEL has a negative worth which means it could go much lower but not necessarily.
In effect, there's little or no fundamental reason to own the stock at all. That's been the case for years. The company's results confirm it.
Terchnically its trend continues decidedly down.
So what a Bull is left with is a bad gamble. History proves that as those same Bulls bought every drop only to see the stock go lower.
A couple of them on this board have no understanding or appreciation of fundamentals or T/A. There results prove that.
When the fundamentals change and the technicals line up, it'll be a time to be serious about owning shares. Right now, FCEL is selling shares into the market.
How's that for confidence?
Best advice is to sit on what you have and cross your fingers. Avoid what you hear from te pushers.
In the case of ENRON there was massive manipulation of the company practices and the stock price. It benefitted a few insiders. ENRON is case in point that companies and stock can be manipulated. It was a malicious attack that devastated retail investors life savings. FCEL is no ENRON.
Reddit proved that stock prices can be pushed either way. In Gamestop it was pushed up forcing major hedge funds to cover their short positions or lose massively. FCEL is no Reddit.
It is possible that what a company does to benefit long term outlook appears to benefit only a minority of investors when in fact the long term objective is plainly stated and feasible once you understand the plan. It is beneficial to all investors. That is FCEL.
And it is not the FCEL of 6-10 yrs ago. If FCEL is selling shares, and they most probably are, then smart shorters are going to short this stock. Whether they are savvy enough to get out in a timely fashion is not the concern of longs. In fact it is amusing to watch the scramble.
The plan of continuously adding recurring revenue within the bounds of preserving cash flow is sound. The opportunity exists however to make life altering decisions that benefit FCEL and all long investors. Worrying about what short sellers are doing or whether the company is financed with debt or equity takes your eye off the ball.
CCS plus Solid Oxide H2 generation plus efficiency , diversified revenue streams and leadership is what matters.
ENRON screwed a lot of every day people.
There are companies that have a plan and execute the plan and benefit investors.
That is FCEL.
Buy low, sell high.
Saying you know so much about the stock and so far you’ve been right how low is this going to go?
"In September Toyota TLS was waiting for LEED certification."
there is nothing in Sept's pr that says anything about waiting for certification...they announced the completion of the facility and presented it as ready to go...
todays pr is literally a cut and paste of sept's pr...
this is almost a joke...they put out this pr out simply to sell shares...how is the pps supposed to rise into earnings if they just keep manufacturing pr's to sell into?...
it looks to me like Few may have thrown in the towel and is just going to dilute the whole 500 mil shares at whatever price he can get and then r/s and start all over....i think people buying shares right now may be buying way too high...
Can't get past $1.00. How's it going to get to $1.60 ?
In your reasoning , If/when it get to $.50 it'll be a screaming buy.
Ever think there's a reason why it struggles to stay above $.80 ?
Tell me its "manipulation" going on for 3 years. LMAO
That answers the WHY. I couldn't figure out why the stock didn't pop on the news .
Wasn't aware they made this announcent in Sept.
Notice the 3 blind mice added shares thinking the news was something to write home about. CLUELESS !!!
Ya I caught a few shares at 0.8585.
Cash on hand over 340 mil plus physical assets of around 450 mil total not including patents, etc puts share price around $1.85-$1.90. Shorties keep shorting doing me a favor.
In September Toyota TLS was waiting for LEED certification. Today is Grand Opening. May be that Toyota obtained certification therefore different from "completing" construction. Also interesting is that
in April 2024, the first heavy-duty FCEV Kenworth T680 Class 8 truck was filled at the adjacent Shell HD filling station using Tri-gen-produced renewable hydrogen hence Shell closing their stations in the area vs importing H2.
Looks to me like fcel already made this announcement back in Sept…how many times are they going to make the same announcement?…lol
Might be why it’s down…Few probably had no other way to dilute millions of shares without tanking the pps badly…so he’s recycling old news?…
This is pitiful…
You are seeing the light! Welcome to the bright side. Do you see any reason to make announcement from Toyota/Port of Long Beach today?
No doubt shorties still trying. I see buying opportunity. At these prices, a doubling to $1.60 is a steal. Actual valuation without adding in Derby probably closer to 1.90.
I like the idea of licensing in theory but if other variables like tax incentives etc do not go through there may not be demand enough for licensing. So we are back to how to capitalize on tremendous technology that benefits the effects of climate change. I feel some of the pieces of Rotterdam are missing. For instance the amount of carbon in flue exhaust will directly affect the total amount captured. I think Rotterdam was chosen because of the higher concentration of carbon. For example, capturing 100% of carbon from a plantthat only has the potential for a million lbs total capture compared to capturing 50% of another plant whose potential is 10 million lbs is a factor for any future planning with regard to capitalization. On the one hand a million lbs capture compared to 5 mil lbs. Five times the capture. Perhaps the metric should be % captured compared to % concentration in the exhaust gas.
I am trying to keep the numbers coherent.
The Toyota announcement today joined by FCEL's FEW, re: trigen is the 1st solid piece of news the company has annonced. It may be enough to move the needle to $1.00 or so.
Finally something to talk about.
Volume is currently only 97,000 shares. That combined with yesterday's action tells me the shorts have not given up yet. This minimum gain pre 9:00 a.m. could just be the attempt to try to create some volatility again. Historically they want to retest support two to three times minimum. That support check could be in If we hold over yesterday's close through the first hour and break 95 cents.
FuelCell Energy and Toyota Motor North America Celebrate Launch of World's First "Tri-gen" Production System at the Port of Long Beach
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fuelcell-energy-toyota-motor-north-113000504.html
Correct in my opinion, however, Exxonmobil was pushing testing and improvements throughout the entire process, because they also knew they needed the policy support in order to make the technology profitable. I'm confident they will get better than 90% but if they get 88 or 89% and they're on budget it will still be considered a success. However, I think your facts on mobile thought they were going to fall short of 90%. They would not have moved forward with the project. Last night I was thinking about all this As I was watching a very recent video from Vijay Swarup with ExxonMobil. In his 17 minute video of his lecture, He reiterated a couple different points numerous times, scale and collaboration. A huge light bulb turned on. Licensing! FCEL is never going to be able to get to 300-400MW production prior to 2030 because they won't even get a green light for commercialization until 2026. If this is in fact the best or 1 of the few proven options to affordably and efficiently capture carbon, we can, and I believe should license the tech to others that can bring scale to 1,000MW a year more quickly. FCE can potentially get up to 200MW without buying more land or massive increase in capex within 1 year from go. But beyond that is a different ball game.
Johnny, the issue with Capital Power is that economically the CCS system there was failing but the technology is sound. The powers that be in Calgary and their environmentalists see CCS as an added expense rather than an ecologically beneficial response to climate change. As you state, the infusing of tax incentives is needed for CCS here in the states to support proven technology. Two competing trains of thought, environmental vs economical issues.
"The dawn of the renewable hydrogen era is upon us", from the Port of Long Beach post. 1,200 kg of hydrogen and 1,400 gallons of water a day!!! Virtually zero pollutants! How do you beat that? Simple, You don't!
If, If the Rotterdam project results stated 88% carbon capture was achieved would that necessarily be a failure? How often are goals immediately met exactly as planned? Also , the premise for pairing FCEL's modules with the added heat from nuclear plants is to reach 100% efficiency. The semantics here seem to be confusing the issue. If you capture 90% of Co2 is that not the same as 90% efficiency?
FuelCell Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: FCEL) is an integrated fuel cell company that designs, manufactures, installs, operates and services stationary fuel cell power plants.
As a leading global fuel cell company, we provide ultra-clean, efficient and reliable baseload distributed generation for electric utilities, commercial and industrial companies, universities, municipalities, government entities and other customers around the world.
Direct FuelCell® (DFC®) power plants manufactured by FuelCell Energy can utilize a variety of fuels including renewable biogas from wastewater treatment and food processing, as well as clean natural gas, directed biogas and propane.
Our DFC power plants produce power electrochemically — without burning fuels — making them clean, quiet and environmentally responsible alternatives to combustion-based generation.
Our power plants have generated more than 1.5 billion kilowatt hours of ultra-clean electricity, equivalent to powering more than 135,000 average-size U.S. homes for one year.
FuelCell Energy’s world headquarters are located in Danbury, Connecticut, in the USA. Our global markets are served from a state-of-the-art production facility in nearby Torrington, Connecticut.
Our customers in Europe are served by German-based FuelCell Energy Solutions, GmbH, a majority owned joint venture with sales and service located in Dresden, Germany and manufacturing in Ottobrunn, Germany, which is near Munich.
Customers in Asia are served by our partner POSCO Energy from manufacturing facilities located in Pohang, South Korea.
FuelCell Energy offers a comprehensive portfolio of services for fuel cell power plants. Specially trained technicians and engineers remotely operate and maintain virtually our entire installed base of Direct FuelCell power plants globally, 24 hours per day, 365 days per year from the state-of-the-art Global Technical Assistance Center located at our Danbury, Connecticut headquarters. Field service technicians directly employed by FuelCell Energy service the power plants on-site.
FuelCell Energy scientists are actively researching unique applications for our versatile DFC technology including hydrogen generation and carbon capture. In addition, we are pursuing research with solid oxide fuel cells as well ashydrogen compression and storage.
FuelCell Energy’s international reputation for leadership in ultra-clean energy solutions has been built on a long history of innovative research and development that reflects the successes of our highly talented and creative workforce. We are the first fuel cell manufacturer to commercialize megawatt-class stationary fuel cell power plants and we believe that we are the first stationary fuel cell manufacturer to generate a quarterly gross profit.
FuelCell Energy traces its roots back to 1969 and the founding of Energy Research Corporation (ERC) by early fuel cell pioneers Bernard Baker and Martin Klein, both chemical engineers with expertise in advanced battery technologies.
In the 1970′s, with funding from the U.S. military and utility companies, the Company conducted extensive research into low-temperature fuel cells as well as silver-zinc battery cells. In the 1980′s and 1990′s the Company switched its focus to high-temperature carbonate fuel cell systems which offered greater commercial applications due to the ability to internally reform readily available fuels such as natural gas and renewable biogas within the fuel cell itself to provide the hydrogen for the power generation process.
Our first commercial power plant was installed in 2003 using a 250 kilowatt (kW) fuel cell stack. Through technology enhancements and cost reductions, we have increased the power output of the stacks by 40 percent to 350 kW and reduced product costs by more than 60 percent. Today we are installing multi-megawatt fuel cell plants and fuel cell parks globally.
The production facility in Torrington, Connecticut, USA was completed in 2001 and produced [2] megawatts (MW) of product the first year. As of the end of fiscal year 2012, the plant was producing at an annual run-rate of 56 MW. The total annual capacity of the facility is 90 MW.
FuelCell Energy began expanding globally in 2007 through its partnership with POSCO Energy , targeting markets in Southeast Asia, particularly South Korea. A European manufacturing, sales and service presence was established in 2012, with German-based FuelCell Energy Solutions, GmbH.
1969 | Company founded as Energy Research Corporation (ERC) |
1992 | 120 kilowatt fuel cell stack demonstrated |
1992 | Initial Public Offering (IPO) |
1996 | 2 megawatt demonstration plant installed in Santa Clara, California |
1999 | Company focuses on carbonate fuel cells, is renamed FuelCell Energy, Inc. & spins off battery division, Evercel |
2003 | First commercial installation of a Direct FuelCell® power plant |
2003 | Annual production of approximately 3 megawatts |
2007 | POSCO Energy partnership begins – global expansion commences |
2007 | Annual production of approximately 11 megawatts |
2009 | Production of 350 kilowatt stack commences |
2011 | Power output milestone reached with one billion kWh of ultra clean electricity produced since 2003 |
2011 | 11 megawatt fuel cell park commences operations in South Korea |
2011 | Annual production of approximately 46 megawatts |
2012 | European presence established with FuelCell Energy Solutions, GmbH |
2012 | Asian manufacturing strategy implemented through license agreement with POSCO Energy |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |