FuelCell Energy Inc (FCEL)

[King James 1]

I like the idea of licensing in theory but if other variables like tax incentives etc do not go through there may not be demand enough for licensing. So we are back to how to capitalize on tremendous technology that benefits the effects of climate change. I feel some of the pieces of Rotterdam are missing. For instance the amount of carbon in flue exhaust will directly affect the total amount captured. I think Rotterdam was chosen because of the higher concentration of carbon. For example, capturing 100% of carbon from a plantthat only has the potential for a million lbs total capture compared to capturing 50% of another plant whose potential is 10 million lbs is a factor for any future planning with regard to capitalization. On the one hand a million lbs capture compared to 5 mil lbs. Five times the capture. Perhaps the metric should be % captured compared to % concentration in the exhaust gas.
I am trying to keep the numbers coherent.