Forwardly Inc (FORW)

[surfkast]

Ask if the one who put it there is willing to remove.

[delerious1]

So what about the last 6 posts here today by s/k and h/b about horse racing...is that really on topic, even for a stock board???

Is that something other members here want to see???

[delerious1]

very weird to have a banner like that on a stock board......Go for it

[surfkast]

It would have to be removed by the mod who posted it.

[delerious1]

Sorry to interrupt the 6 posts about horse racing but could you get this removed from the board intro....seriously????

"NEWS!!!!!!! George is currently pumping his stock portfolios because that's what

George does best! He is nothing more than an ambulance chaser and will

ALWAYS look out for George and only George!"

[surfkast]

Up $25. Horse could not hold the lead.
Logical Myth scratched in a $500,000 race. Curious as to why. I don't believe the horse had a chance. HMMMM MM

[surfkast]

First race at Oaklawn. # 2, US Army, George's horse, 1st time on Lasix. With only a six horse field, may be a good bet.
$50 across.

[surfkast]

Where?

Oaklawn Park - 3/30/2024

Race Race PP ($1.00) Race Type Breed Purse Surface Horse Jockey

1 Allowance Optional Claiming TB $150,000 Dirt U. S. Army Cristian Torres

9 Oaklawn Mile Stakes (Gr. 3) TB $500,000 Dirt Logical Myth Francisco Arrieta

https://www.equibase.com/profiles/Results.cfm?type=People&searchType=O&eID=2019898&rbt=TB

[Huggy Bear]

He has four entered for the day.

[surfkast]

surfkast

Member Level
Re: None

Friday, March 29, 2024 8:47:48 AM

Post#
170553
of 170567
Anyone living near Oaklawn Park in Hot Springs AR can visit George tomorrow and ask him questions to his face! Two major races!

Oaklawn Park - 3/30/2024
Race Race PP ($1.00) Race Type Breed Purse Surface Horse Jockey

1 Allowance Optional Claiming TB $150,000 Dirt U. S. Army Cristian Torres

9 Oaklawn Mile Stakes (Gr. 3) TB $500,000 Dirt Logical Myth Francisco Arrieta


US Army may have a chance in a very tough field.

Logical Myth looks like a real longshot against this tough field. I would toss and look elsewhere.

[Huggy Bear]

Speaking of facts, Sharp had his entry claimed at Oaklawn Thursday, Look Sharp.

Horse went off at 1/5, it was a monster drop in class but hey George won one. He gave the horse away, entering him that far below his punching weight.

But when his shareholders in his collective trifecta of worthless shells basically bought all his racehorses, well it makes more sense.

He has two entries I've seen so far studying the DRF PP for tomorrow, it's Arkansas Derby day which is a formidable card, with great purses for almost all races.

Sharp is in a bit over his head, again, with his
entries tomorrow so far from what I've analyzed. Only thru 7 of 13 races so far yet.

I'll be in the infield in a suit enjoying the gorgeous women and great company - Sharp, well, I don't think he will be ringing the bell in the winners circle again tomorrow...

[oceans11]

So true.
They and their handlers live in perpetual fear that Mr Sharp will outwit them once again to their financial detriment.
The group is obviously of foreign origin as they tend to use what their ESL teachers told them were insults decades ago.
Thus archaic terms such as carnie, clown, moron, etc etc etc appear over and over again.
Their posts were amusing in a sad sort of way for a while, but now they’ve just grown tiresome.
If they were actually native speaking North Americans they would grasp that the entire board is laughing AT them, certainly not WITH them.
Either way their effect on investors is negligible, as they primarily speak to fellow employees.

O11

[Huggy Bear]

No, you have it all wrong.

Carnies like yourself should keep buying all the way into oblivion.

[delerious1]

The way they get it done is by not attacking the company...no....the way they do it is by attacking all the shareholders and members on a given stock board. It really gets ugly sometimes but you know....I guess shareholders like me need to be scared off from OTC stocks

[I-Glow]

I am paid with the great reward of exposing OTC scams. Nothing better than to bring down these serial scammers.

It seems you enjoy losing money to the scammers.

In looking at your posting history you follow Sharp on all of his scams.

So far the true believers have lost their ass on WNFT, SRNW and GVSI - and FORW is down 99%

IG

[surfkast]

Can you do any real DD? Don't like facts? LOL

[gr8grins]

Wow! I'm impressed!!!! 37 posts in the last 24 hours!! Do you get paid in Pesos?

[I-Glow]

You really don't understand securities law.

And the S-1 isn't old news as it is extremely important - especially since the SEC hasn't reviewed the S-1 and posted comments.

It looks like FORW will never pass comments.

IG

[surfkast]

It technically is new as the SEC still has not declared the filing to be in effect.

[shots60]

Old news Dimmer!!!

Can you cut and paste some new material?

[delerious1]

Should be fun Monday

[delerious1]

Nice close up 14%

[surfkast]

But the little pumper girls are claiming that it is effective, but George is withholding it!
They can call posters names, but they have no comprehension.
Georgs can't hide or withhold anything. Once the SEC declares the S - 1 effective, it hits the filings the next day..
All the theories, are just unfounded bullshit theories to try and pump this POS up.

I will post the SEC link again. So sad!


Notifications of effectiveness for Securities Act registration statements and post-effective amendments (other than those that become effective automatically by law) are now posted to the EDGAR system the morning after a filing is determined to be effective. The new EDGAR form type for these notices is EFFECT.

https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/edgarsearchupdates.htm#:~:text=Notifications%20of%20effectiveness%20for%20Securities,for%20these%20notices%20is%20EFFECT.

EDGAR Search

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Forwardly&match=&CIK=&filenum=&State=&Country=&SIC=&owner=exclude&Find=Find+Companies&action=getcompany

[I-Glow]

LMAO! Sharp will never deliver little pumper boy.

Odd that the SEC hasn't reviewed the S-1 and still no comments.

"Form S-1 SEC Comment Period

Approximately two weeks after the filing of an S-1 Registration Statement the SEC completes its review. It then sends comments to the issuer and/or its securities attorney concerning the disclosures made."

You are clueless about securities law - and you are just another bottom feeding pumper-boy.

IG

[MrSmith18]

You are one sick puppy by spending your day watching every trade of FORW. LMAO!!! Well, at the very least you'll be ready for the loonie farm once GS delivers. They might even give you a position as the trash door entrance guard. I hear it pays a peso an hour. Imagine that? They might even pay you in FORW shares, so you feel whole again.

Too funny!!!

[I-Glow]

The S-1 was filed on 12/19/23 - that has been 3 months and 10 days and still no comments from the SEC.

"Form S-1 SEC Comment Period

Approximately two weeks after the filing of an S-1 Registration Statement the SEC completes its review. It then sends Comments to the issuer and/or it's securities attorney concerning the disclosures made."

It is obvious that there is a problem with the S-1.

I doubt the SEC will ever deem the S-1 effective.

IG

[I-Glow]

You don't seem to understand that Sharp hasn't filed a 15c - it has been 3 years and Sharp hasn't accomplished anything!

But you have proven that you are just a Sharp paid pumper - that is clueless about securities law and investing in general.

IG

[I-Glow]

This is too funny - a desperate shareholder jumped the Ask to $0.0123 for 5000 shares. Oh wow, $60 to try and dupe the Sharp cult and novice investors.

It's been over 5 years that Sharp has been the CEO of FORW and he still hasn't accomplished anything of value.

IG

[MrSmith18]

Go back to your Mexican looney house where there's always room for one more. LMAO!

Oh, BTW I disagree with your assessment. SRNW is so shovel-ready that it won't take much to get something very significant off the ground. Why anyone would try to scam a sure bet is just not smart and hence not Israeli. Patience will pay off with this one.

JMHO

[I-Glow]

I was following a very sophisticated scam - and I called every move they made and it was an Israeli company - the management vanished and the SEC takes a hard look at all things Israeli on the OTC.

The only thing brewing is more Sharp pumping and you being his biggest cheerleader.

How did the 2 assets Sharp brought into FORW work out - the answer is that they were both scams (Ligand and Maverick).

Let me quess - Sharp is really going to do something great and he really means it this time.

There aren't any deals - just your insane pumping.

IG

[MrSmith18]

When you're dealing with Israelis, they, who pretty much wrote the rules also know how to move the goal posts. All I can say is that I'm pretty confident that something very significant is brewing and all we mortals can do is 'wait and see' what happens. At the end of the day, it's how this game has always been played.

[ARobinson]

What about the FORW S-1 do you think is sensitive info? Perhaps the offering price?

[MrSmith18]

Like I said already, GS is probably holding it up on some minor technicality. If I was in his shoes and planning a strong re-entry, I'd certainly hold all of my 'powder' until I was ready to fire. GS is no fool. He's not going to repeat the GVSI pre-announcement mistake again.

JMHO

[surfkast]

It was not effective and still is not. PS..They don't approve, they make it effective.I have posted a quote from the SEC website.

Notifications of effectiveness for Securities Act registration statements and post-effective amendments (other than those that become effective automatically by law) are now posted to the EDGAR system the morning after a filing is determined to be effective. The new EDGAR form type for these notices is EFFECT.

https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/edgarsearchupdates.htm#:~:text=Notifications%20of%20effectiveness%20for%20Securities,for%20these%20notices%20is%20EFFECT.

EDGAR Search

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Forwardly&match=&CIK=&filenum=&State=&Country=&SIC=&owner=exclude&Find=Find+Companies&action=getcompany

[MrSmith18]

I'm not surprised to hear that the S-1 was approved back in January. There just wasn't any hard evidence in favor of a decline. The fact that it hasn't been posted officially also doesn't surprise me. I'm sure GS has found some minor technicality to stall the SEC from publishing it.

...which leads me to believe that GS is prepping for a very determined re-entry with a deal that not even his angriest opponents will be able to derail.

I'm of the belief that GS (with the advise of his Israeli partners) orchestrated an ugly scenario to achieve two goals. First, they had to get rid of the unruly OTC retail shareholders/flippers. They had become a liability for any deal and had to go. So far it appears by the reduced number of messages on this board and others that he's removed the undesirables. Second, he's opened up his SPAC to the would be investors to pick up some cheap shares. As DrugDoctor noted on the SRNW board recently, the accumulation numbers for SRNW have increased notably in the past few weeks. By redistributing shares from weak hands to stronger ones, GS can close an awesome deal, especially with SRNW, since its float is a mere 50m shares. Any rise in SRNW will also affect FORW.

JMHO

[MrSmith18]

I'm not surprised to hear that the S-1 was approved back in January. There just wasn't any hard evidence in favor of a decline. The fact that it hasn't been posted officially also doesn't surprise me. I'm sure GS has found some minor technicality to stall the SEC from publishing it.

...which leads me to believe that GS is prepping for a very determined re-entry with a deal that not even his angriest opponents will be able to derail.

I'm of the belief that GS (with the advise of his Israeli partners) orchestrated an ugly scenario to achieve two goals. First, they had to get rid of the unruly OTC retail shareholders/flippers. They had become a liability for any deal and had to go. So far it appears by the reduced number of messages on this board and others that he's removed the undesirables. Second, he's opened up his SPAC to the would be investors to pick up some cheap shares. As DrugDoctor noted on the SRNW board recently, the accumulation numbers for SRNW have increased notably in the past few weeks. By redistributing shares from weak hands to stronger ones, GS can close an awesome deal, especially with SRNW, since its float is a mere 50m shares. Any rise in SRNW will also affect FORW.

JMHO

[surfkast]

No. The SEC will upload the document once effective

Is it possible that FORW's S-1 was actually marked effective on 1/24/2024? And it' being kept confidential

Notifications of effectiveness for Securities Act registration statements and post-effective amendments (other than those that become effective automatically by law) are now posted to the EDGAR system the morning after a filing is determined to be effective. The new EDGAR form type for these notices is EFFECT.

https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/edgarsearchupdates.htm#:~:text=Notifications%20of%20effectiveness%20for%20Securities,for%20these%20notices%20is%20EFFECT.

EDGAR Search

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Forwardly&match=&CIK=&filenum=&State=&Country=&SIC=&owner=exclude&Find=Find+Companies&action=getcompany

[knrorrel]

This is great new information and I learn something new every day and because I'm not from America, I find it very interesting how things are going in your country and I think you are right and I have noticed that $FORW has shown very good strength in the last few days and does not want to go down! ........ The tendency is rather that this stock $FORW wants to go up. There are definitely some reasons running in the background, so I think we have an exciting time ahead of us and the patient ones will be the winners.

Hey MrSmith18, I got curious and found something interesting. Per this the OTC Updates Twitter handle, 141m shares were added to FORW float on 1/24/2024. This is the approx. the same number of shares that was registered in the FORW S-1 (~138m).

ChatGPT says: Yes, when an S-1 registration statement is marked effective by the SEC, the newly registered shares are typically added to the company's float. The float refers to the number of shares actually available for trading by the public. Once the SEC declares the S-1 effective, the company can issue the registered securities, and these shares can then be traded on the open market, thereby increasing the float.

Is it possible that FORW's S-1 was actually marked effective on 1/24/2024? And it' being kept confidential because it in some way reveals the SRNW merger? Thoughts? Thanks!

[ARobinson]

Hey MrSmith18, I got curious and found something interesting. Per this the OTC Updates Twitter handle, 141m shares were added to FORW float on 1/24/2024. This is the approx. the same number of shares that was registered in the FORW S-1 (~138m).

ChatGPT says: Yes, when an S-1 registration statement is marked effective by the SEC, the newly registered shares are typically added to the company's float. The float refers to the number of shares actually available for trading by the public. Once the SEC declares the S-1 effective, the company can issue the registered securities, and these shares can then be traded on the open market, thereby increasing the float.

Is it possible that FORW's S-1 was actually marked effective on 1/24/2024? And it' being kept confidential because it in some way reveals the SRNW merger? Thoughts? Thanks!

[surfkast]

Low volume and down 8%. LOL

[knrorrel]

Absolutely agree, I really like that we are going up 10% every day without any news and as far as I'm concerned it can continue like this or someone is quietly collecting in the background, so the chart is crying out for a breakout and with every little news or update $FORW flies
imho

[Drugdoctor]

$FORW keeps creeping back up... with no NEWS... someone knows something...

[gr8grins]

I do!

[Drugdoctor]

Yep, and it's going to hit at any time now! Got shares? You know I do!

[surfkast]

Correct. My point is that I don't believe it was approved. Remember it was filed on December 18, 2023. The usual response time is 4 weeks for SEC comments. Based on other filings, I believe due to the time frame, there are issues.

[gr8grins]

SEC's response will become publicly available after the completion of the securities offering but not earlier than 20 business days following the effective date of the registration statement.

[surfkast]

If the S 1 was approved the SEC would have filed a NOTICE OF EFFECTIVENESS statement.

[MrSmith18]

SRNW and FORW are joined at the hip. As long as FORW holds unexpired SRNW warrants, the pps will follow that of SRNW. As of January the ratio appears to be as follows: For every $0.17 that SRNW rises or falls, FORW moved a penny. The ratio is based on historic data and could change due to external factors plus the two warrant's respective expiration dates.

All that said...
I'm guessing that the S-1 has been approved. There's no reason for it not to. GS is probably waiting on an approval deadline to either close a deal or continue negotiating. The basis for my guess was basically taken from the same playbook for GVSI where GS set a date and allowed for an extension. The difference being this time is that he's working this deal behind the scenes to avoid a calamity similar to March 15. Just as a guess, maybe that date in question is March 31 or April 1. Knowing GS's cynical humor, I'd take the latter for April Fool's Day.

JMHO

[surfkast]

My bad. Since it is not listed on the OTCM page I did not see it. I see it now on the EDGAR site.
. Interesting that it has now been over three months and no update. Based on seeing years of filings posted, there apparently are SEC issues that need to be resolved.

[ARobinson]

Yeah, the S-1 shows up on EDGAR so it definitely got filed. However there are no public filings after that.