Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
F.G. I hope this isn't "off topic" but have you taken a look at asxi? I can't understand that stock. It makes money, has a small float, but it hardly ever trades. I don't own it, I bought it a long long time ago and sold and got beat up by the MM's. they have an iron grip on the stock it seems and they really rape you both ways. the buy and sell. but the company is profitable, and the ceo seems to be an honest guy just running a decent little company. he even wrote to the sec complaining, and you don't see that much I don't think, because if you think about it he's inviting scrutiny, and if he's doing something wrong, why would he do that??
¶ THTH appears to be conservatively operated...
and trades below $1.00...
http://biz.yahoo.com/p/t/thth.html
Thinkpath Inc. Announces Investment Opinion: KSH Investment Group Initiates Coverage On Thinkpath With a ``BUY'' Rating and a 12-Month Price Target of $4.50 -- $5.00
NOTE TO EDITORS: The following is an investment opinion issued
by Thinkpath Inc.
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 14, 2001--KSH Investment Group,
Inc. has initiated research coverage on Thinkpath Inc. (Nasdaq:THTH)
with a rating of "BUY".
In his report, Analyst Leonard Bogner stated "We project revenues
could expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 25% during the
next five years, while net income climbs at a CAGR of roughly 50%.
"Based on our projections, we believe Thinkpath could be
generating revenues in excess of $125 million by mid-decade, and net
of $15 million, or $0.85 per fully diluted share. We believe the
shares are undervalued relative to Thinkpath's growth prospects and
comparisons with peer equities and the S&P 500. Consequently, we rate
the stock a BUY. Our six-month stock price target is $2.50 -- $3.00.
Our 12-month stock price target is $4.50 -- $5.00."
About Thinkpath Inc.
Thinkpath is a provider of IT & engineering services, offering a
blended suite of outsourcing, recruiting, training and technology to
enhance the resource performance of large and high-growth
corporations. Thinkpath clients include Microsoft, General Motors,
Goldman Sachs, Cummins, and EDS Canada. Thinkpath has 500 employees in
18 offices across North America. Further information about the
company, its services and products can be found at www.thinkpath.com.
For more information or to receive a copy of the preliminary
report, please call KSH Investment Group at (516) 466-1117.
For more information regarding Thinkpath Inc., please contact
Robert B. Prag, President, The Del Mar Consulting Group, Inc.
858-794-9500 /bprag@delmarconsulting.com.
--30--jsw/clv*
CONTACT: The Del Mar Consulting Group, Inc.
Robert B. Prag, 858/794-9500
bprag@delmarconsulting.com
or
KSH Investment Group, 516/466-1117
Jeff, please, ask your friend why... FG
I messed up-------that should have said six weeks, not two weeks----sorry about that-----Jeffgo
Hot tip-------Just out---My friends broker said CLRT to hit $2.00 in two weeks. Anyone ever heard of it or know anything about it. Thanks in advance.--------Jeffgo
<font size="+2"><font color="chocolate">RETURN of the JEDI</font></a>
Firstly, I'd like to thank all the posters who follow and posts on the Threads I chair: SEVU, F.GEMS, EXHIB and MM+SSB and have shown their support during my time-out... Other posters, such as Georgia Bard, Marty Lewis, Bird of Prey, Kurious Kat were also very supportive and their concern is much appreciated...
I want to make it abundantly clear that I stand by every posts I have ever written on this Message Board and have absolutely No regrets whatsoever... My purpose was to expose perceived threats to the original iHUB model and to stimulate the implementation of solutions, without delay...
I note that many things have changed for the better in the last seven days and that my termination/suspension wasn't in vain... That I should be terminated/suspended at all for pointing out certain obvious inadequacies in the system, clearly demonstrates that there is still much to do to get it right, as such action was clearly unfair and totally unjustifiable...
Matt has promised me a hand-build Italian marble Cyber Statue to thank me for my untiring efforts to help build iHUB, from around Post #3200, at the end of August 2000, and perhaps for being the first "Martyr" to the iHUB cause...<g>
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=3301
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=3485
Needless to say that a number of "Old Guard" Posters are going to continue monitoring vigilantly the implementation of various improvements in the many areas that are in need... So, let's get back to posting balanced, supported and Credible posts....
And may the SCHWARZ be with YOU!....
JMHO, F. Goelo + + +
Do you know Rod Evans? Is he your brother?
TRAC looks to have a sweet open. Worth watching. EOM
News out on TRAC, MyTrack (went from .90 to 1.70 in two weeks)
TRACK DATA REPORTS FIRST QUARTER RESULTS
REAFFIRMS STOCK BUYBACK
New York, New York - May 10, 2001 - Track Data Corporation
(Nasdaq NMS: TRAC) today announced results for its first
quarter ended March 31, 2001.
Revenues for the first quarter ended March 31, 2001 were
$17,391,000 compared to $12,890,000 for the same period in
2000, an increase of 35%. Net income for the first quarter
of 2001 was $5,355,000, or $.08 per share, compared to a net
loss for the 2000 period of $(1,878,000), or $(.03) per
share. The revenue increase in 2001 was due principally to
the Company’s myTrack services and the recognition of full
commissions since obtaining its broker-dealer license and
state registrations in August 2000.
Barry Hertz, Chairman and CEO, commented, "The results for
the first quarter continue to reflect significant profitable
operations realized principally from our efforts in mid-2000
to reduce costs throughout our business lines.
"The Company recently completed the purchase of 4.5 million
shares of its common stock and the Board authorized the
purchase of up to an additional 3 million shares. The
Company believes that its stock is still undervalued. In
light of the Company's business prospects for 2001 and
beyond, the Board of Directors believes that repurchase of
its shares is a prudent use of its capital. The Company
expects to continue to purchase shares under the repurchase
plan, from time to time, depending on market conditions and
the price per share."
Barry Hertz will conduct a live chat session this afternoon
at 4:15 p.m. EST to discuss this release and the outlook for
2001. myTrack members can participate in the chat by using
the chat feature (channel 4) of the myTrack online trading
service. Non-members can view the chat by going to the web
site http://www.mytrack.com and clicking on the "Live Chat"
link in the left-hand navigation bar. Those viewing the
chat from the web will be able to see the questions in
real-time and will be able to initiate questions.
Track Data is a New York-based financial services company
that provides real-time financial market data, news, and
research to institutional and individual investors through
dedicated telecommunication lines and the Internet.
For individual investors, Track offers myTrack, a fully
integrated, Internet-based online trading and market data
system. myTrack’s direct access online trading has
commissions starting at $12.95 per trade and allows users
the choice of where to route their orders. myTrack’s
continuous, dynamic stream of live market data is powered
by application-based software and a constant server
connection similar to systems used by professionals, making
it faster than the HTML web-based static pages offered by
most of its competitors, such as Ameritrade (AMTD) and TD
Waterhouse (NYSE: TWE). In addition to all the free data
supplied to myTrack users-streaming delayed quotes, company
news, charting for technical analysis, and a proprietary
library of intra-day market statistics-myTrack users can
choose from a selection of paid data and research, including
streaming real-time quotes and Nasdaq Level II. myTrack
offers access through PCs, browser phones, and PDAs, such
as Palm Organizers (made by Palm Inc. (Nasdaq: PALM)) and
Visors (made by Handspring (Nasdaq: HAND)).
myTrack offers the first week of trading commission-free.
To open a trading account, go to http://www.mytrack.com or
call 1-800-myTrack.
For additional information about Track Data, please contact
Rafi Reguer, Director of Corporate Communications, at
718-260-4232 or by e-mail: rafi_reguer@tdc.com.
Forward-looking statements in this release are made pursuant
to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words "believe," "expect,"
"plan," "anticipate" and other similar expressions generally
identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of their dates. These
forward-looking statements are based largely on the Company's
current expectations and are subject to a number of risks
and uncertainties, including without limitation, volatility
in the stock market, changes in external market factors
including the economy, changes in the Company's business or
growth strategy or an inability to execute its strategy due
to changes in its industry and other risks and uncertainties
indicated from time to time in the Company's filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the
Company's Forms 10-K, 10-Q, S-3 and S-8. Actual results
could differ materially from the results referred to in the
forward-looking statements.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Three Months Ended
March 31
2001
Revenues $17,391,000
Net income (loss)(A)(B)(C) 5,355,000
Basic and diluted income (loss)
per share $.08
Three Months Ended
March 31
2000
Revenues $12,890,000
Net income (loss)(A)(B)(C) (1,878,000)
Basic and diluted income (loss)
per share $(.03)
(A) Includes $276,000 in 2001 and $32,000 in 2000 of income
from equity in an affiliate.
(B) Includes gain on marketable securities of $823,000 in
2001 and $540,000 in 2000.
(C) There is no provision for (benefit from) taxes in any
period.
Humbly report, FG, I am aware you cannot respond to this post, but figure you are reading, so, thought I'd let you know that it seems we were both wrong -- as things stand at present.
You said, "don't think it'll work for GENI" in the post to which I am replying, and I said pretty much the same thing, earlier.
As I understand it, the paper version of the "call yer certs" letter just got delivered today, and it appears to me a short squeeze is indeed in progress.
Not yet willing to say that GENI will continue to rise, but admitting I was dead wrong up to now -- in this particular case "call yer certs" seems to be working.
Cheers,
Svejk
Infotopia, Inc. Announces Strong First Quarter Financial Results
Tuesday May 8, 3:04 pm Eastern Time
Press Release
Infotopia, Inc. Announces Strong First Quarter Financial Results
Reports Revenues of $23.9 Million and Net Income of $1.6 Million
BOSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 8, 2001--INFOTOPIA, INC. (OTC BB:IFTP - news) today announced updated revenues and earnings for its first quarter ended March 31, 2001.
After review and adjustments by the auditors, revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2001 were $23,923,000 compared to $0 for the same year ago period. Net income for the first quarter ended March 31, 2001 was $1,562,000, or $0.01 per basic and diluted share, compared to a net loss of $1,028,000 or $(0.25) per basic and diluted share. Infotopia did not conduct operations during the first quarter ended March 31, 2000.
The company noted that the majority of its revenues for the first quarter of 2001 were derived from strong sales of its fitness products including the Body By Jake, Bun & Thigh Rocker, Torso Tiger, Medicus Dual 2000 and Total Tiger. In addition, sales of Hot Mommies and Backstroke Back Massager also contributed to first quarter revenues.
Ernest Zavoral, President of Infotopia, commented, ``The company is quite pleased with the substantial revenues and earnings reported for the first quarter of 2001, a trend we expect will continue throughout the year. We are especially proud to note that the company has been able to achieve such impressive financial results even though we have only been operational as a stand-alone company for less than a year. As the company continues to mature and build on its leadership position in the infomercial industry, we remain confident that we will be able to take advantage of the multitude of growth opportunities that currently lie before us as well as future opportunities.''
Daniel Hoyng, CEO and Chairman, stated, ``Infotopia's first quarter results are further evidence of the success of our strategic business plan and the strong acceptance of our products and infomercials by the consumer. We also believe these results further strengthen our leadership position in the direct response and consumer product industry. It is important to note that the Body by Jake, Bun and Thigh Rocker was our only product in full television rollout during the first quarter of 2001. Medicus Dual 2000, Michael Thurmond's Six Week Body Makeover, Hot Mommies and Total Tiger are still in the ramp-up phase of television media spending. Based on the initial success of these products, we are confident that these products will play a significant role in our revenue and earnings growth in the second quarter and beyond. Additionally, the Body by Jake, Bun and Thigh Rocker is scheduled for a fall roll-out to retail.''
The company noted it incurred a one-time charge of $786,891 for discounts it granted for the sale of securities as a result of its fund raising efforts during the quarter. The proceeds were utilized to continue to fuel the growth of the company and help assure continued revenue and profit growth for the coming quarters. In addition, the Company had $2,513,657 in deferred revenue for this period and prepaid expenses versus those revenue of $1,350,500, this would have resulted in $1,163,157.00 in additional profit this quarter, had the Company been able to ship the goods prior to March 31, 2001. This was the result of significant backorders on both Body by Jake, Bun And Thigh Rocker and Total Tiger due to such high consumer demand for our products. The Company is no longer operating on a backorder basis on these products.
Mr. Hoyng concluded, ``We are confident that the current product lines consisting of our top performing health and fitness machines, along with other product lines that are currently under development will enable Infotopia to continue to grow quickly and significantly on a quarter-to-quarter basis.''
ABOUT INFOTOPIA
The Company's mission is to produce, market, and distribute an expanding line of high-quality, innovative health, fitness and consumer products. Infotopia seeks out products that deliver superior value, outstanding quality, and competitive prices to best satisfy customer demand. The Company markets its products to consumers through a variety marketing channels, including infomercials, distributor alliances, and Internet e-commerce. The management at Infotopia is committed to increasing corporate revenues and profits. The company's website is located at http://www.infotopia.tv .
This news release includes ``forward-looking statements'' that include risk and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements in this release are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially due to a variety of factors, including without limitation the Company's ability to produce and market products and/or services and other risks detailed from time to time in their Company's reports filed with the Securities Exchange Commission.
INFOTOPIA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
At At
March 31, 2001 December 31, 2000
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $ 194,743 $ 787,150
Accounts receivable - net of
141,458 and $218,254 10,580,052 934,392
Inventory 2,004,839 418,689
Loan Receivable 200,000 --
Subscription Receivable 1,356,914 --
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets 2,877,100 268,051
Employee Advances 73,753 65,485
Investments in marketable
securities, at fair value 180,000 174,000
Total current assets 17,467,401 2,647,767
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, less
accumulated depreciation
of $273,339 and $ 255,383 277,236 239,773
CAPITALIZED PRODUCTION COSTS, less
accumulated amortization of $-0-
and $-0- 1,006,249 690,475
OTHER ASSETS
Licenses and other intangibles,
less accumulated amortization of
$552,325 and $300,549 3,981,952 2,415,307
Deposits 1,102,233 212,143
TOTAL ASSETS $ 23,835,071 $ 6,205,465
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 3,121,293 $ 1,798,620
Due to Employees -- 108,723
Debenture 545,000 50,000
Short Term Note Payables to
Stockholders 832,401
Stock to be issued for Cash/Services 1,087,831
Media and AR Loans Payable 5,138,069
Deferred Revenue 2,513,657 38,162
Total Current Liabilities 13,238,251 1,995,505
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Debenture -- 600,000
TOTAL LIABILITIES 2,595,505
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock - 3/31/01: $.001 par
value, 190,000,000 shares authorized;
189,996,000 shares issued and
outstanding; 189,996 172,236
Preferred Stock - 3/31/01:
$.001 par value, 10,000,000
shares authorized; 8,100,000
shares issued and outstanding 8,100 --
Additional paid-in-capital 46,832,950 41,440,254
Accumulated deficit (36,464,226) (38,026,530)
Unrealized gain on marketable
securities 30,000 24,000
Total stockholders' equity 10,596,820 3,609,960
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 23,835,071 $ 6,205,465
INFOTOPIA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statement of Operations
(Unaudited)
For the three For the three
month period month period
ended ended
March 31, 2001 March 31, 2000
REVENUE
Sales, net of returns and allowances
of $725,767 $ 23,922,632 $ --
COST OF SALES 6,691,634 --
GROSS PROFIT 17,230,997 --
OPERATING EXPENSES
General and administrative 1,605,954 1,028
Selling and marketing 12,580,984
Depreciation and amortization 251,310
Total operating expenses 14,438,250 1,028
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS 2,792,748 (1,028)
OTHER EXPENSES
Interest expense 443,553 0
Discount expense 786,891 0
Total other expenses 1,230,444 0
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 1,562,304 (1,028)
INCOME TAXES 0 0
NET INCOME $ 1,562,304 $ (1,028)
Basic and Diluted earnings
per share $ 0.01 (0.25)
Weighted Average of Shares
Outstanding 189,206,671 105,490,686
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact:
Infotopia, Inc.
Robert Tilton
609-888-4111
IFTPIR@infotopia.tv
Humbly report, stocktalk, anything that Gary Dobry has to say goes directly into the circular file, as far as I'm concerned.
Have had the unfortunate luck of coming across his rants way too many times, never found a grain of truth in them that could be substantiated by anyone with integrity that I know of, so I simply ignore them.
May be a good idea for you to find out more about Gary, instead of concentrating on Janice.
Or, better yet, take a long hard look at your holdings, and use your own skills to decide if they are sound, regardless of what Gary or Janice have to say.
Just my humble opinion, of course.
My last word on the subject of Gary and Janice, I hope.
Cheers,
Svejk
P.S. No position in IFTP, long or short. Never had one, never will.
Janice you should be the one to talk, you have how many thousands of posts on the iftp board in about 6 months...10-15 thousand, I am just guessing. You are gonna ask me if I get paid to hype iftp, while you sit on the iftp board all day and claim to have no position???
Do you know anything about Gary Dobry? If not, I suggest you do a little research before you quote him again.
Or are you another of the people who believes anything that pleases him, whether it's correct or not?
Tell me: are you one of the IFTP paid hypesters? If so, kindly make proper disclosure.
There is no significant short position in this stock. Just a CEO who can't stop issuing paper.
As for Gary Dobry's "article", anyone who can't see that it's the work of a disordered and demented mind needs his own examined. Dobry is being sued for libel, and this is his revenge. Since he can't talk about the person who's suing him--because he's been ordered by the court not to do so--he's coming after me.
He's sent people to check out my home. He's getting hold of personal data about me and posting it all over the Web. Much of this information is entirely incorrect, but he doesn't seem to care about that.
So: are you proud to support a crazed stalker? You decide.
jo-jo, I have a sense of humor. Since you asked so nicely I will let you go to the link and ask the poster on that particular board. Man I could have saved you some time.
Humble request, stocktalk, re your, "...who has been caught by the United States legal systems for conning people? Janice Shell or Infotopia? Janice Shell."
I presume you have proof of that statement. Please provide it!
Oh, and if you're talking about WebNode, please do get a sense of humor:
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=4936422
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=8676166
http://www.computeruser.com/newstoday/99/04/28/news4.html
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=12182423
Cheers,
Svejk
Hey FG do you have any thoughts on this it is concerning iftp....
When you are done, make sure to read this http://www.onthecanvas.com/toppage11.htm
Here is where I took this from http://www.agoracom.com/nonmemforum/msgreview.asp?id=93048&refid=0&orig=93048
I really don't think the problem of shorting will go away with ease. Dan's news releases will continue to go ignored. This is a problem he created himself. So it will take a lot for shorts to cover. Dan dug his own hole and now realizes the problems. I think the problem is much bigger than we may think and a dilemma that management is very considered about. Before bashers try to continue to insult longs as if there's no short position here lets emphasize some points again. We now know that OTC shorting is a huge market. We know stocks can be shorted or bought long. To say its difficult to short a stock is a very lame and weak attempt by bashers. The longs have to be less gullible and realize that ''all'' stocks can be shorted and Iftp is being shorted. From the months of September to February there was the most amount of money reported as short positions ever in the NASDAQ. These trends have carried over to the OTC markets as well. This bear market is not just a buyers strike. It is short sellers shorting at every attempt. What better market than the OTC where there is no money to counter act the short positions on the long side? So, lets clear some points and bring this case together.
If you are a long on this stock I hope you are not so naive to believe that bashers bash for fun or to protect society for the better. If they were so worried about this company posing harm to investors don't you think they should be bashing their story to the SEC if they really cared? And if they have, obviously the SEC knows that this company is legit. Lets not think like adolescents and think this company is a scam and bashers are trying to help everyone for FREE. I hope we are all smarter than that. Everyone on these boards are here for one agenda:MONEY. Anyone who tells you different don't trust. Lets tie this together.
Starting with bashers. I don't think they are a threat like many longs think they are, but I think they validate short positions. Please as a serious investor read these articles I am recommending. Look at the basher named Janice Shell in this article. Is she a suspect of shorting ethics? Very seriously to the point of illegal actions. Read the below article. She is a short seller and works for short sellers. Is she associated with bashing Infotopia? Yes, So link this story and Infotopia. Please read the story in its entirety
http://www.onthecanvas.com/toppage11.htm
Also study the Stockpatrol articles with Janice Shell postings on Raging Bull. Disturbingly similar. Almost identical writing styles. Is it yet another coincidence that this short seller (Stockpatrol) comes out bashing Infotopia in full force as soon as Infotopia's stock price touches their highs for the year? Where was stockpatrol when the stock price was at 6,7,8, or even 10 cents to warn us investors? I guess the price wasn't high enough at those levels to short. So they waited till the stock hit its 52 week high. But, Janice Shell continues to beg investors to listen to her story so desperately. Why is she so desperate if this is just an innocent hobby for her? Cause she has money on the line just like everyone else who claims this is a hobby for them. She states that Infotopia is out to con us. But, who has been caught by the United States legal systems for conning people? Janice Shell or Infotopia? Janice Shell. So longs now you see how these criminal bashers work. Like the quote we all hear, ''nobody comes to Wall Street without thinking about money 24/7.'' Real charity workers would go to real charity places. Would they come to a place where the worlds money is? Do not let these bashers insult you any longer. They are after money.
Now that you have linked the most known basher of Infotopia as a short seller we can move on. Lets take a look at these interesting trading statistics and make a common sense conclusion. Please read the article and statistics in its entirety
http://www.agoracom.com/nonmemforum/msgreview.asp?id=92917&refid=0&orig=92917
That kind of trading is not coincidence. It is professional short selling.
Lets now look at recent company behavior. Was the last chairman message a message of excitement and developments or a concern of shorting? My opinion is a very serious concern for shorting. Take a look at these comments in just the last chairman's message by Dan Hoyng.
Dan Hoyng quote-''The ability to track short positions will be of significant value to the shareholders and Company''
Why is it so important to track short positions in the future Dan Hoyng? Maybe cause you are so bothered you cant track them now.
Dan Hoyng quote-''Therefore, all short positions must be covered in order to receive a liquidating distribution.''
Again another message to shorts and the obvious existing short position in Infotopia. Seems to me this CEO is exasperated very much with the short positions.
This is not the only recent company behaviors due to shorting. The most obvious is the removal of the DTC sheets at the same exact time it seemed shorting was picking up. This again is not coincidence, but rather taking away beneficial information away from short sellers. So, why is the company behavior dominated by shorting of the stock? Because the company has lost command of this stock to short sellers.
There are still more ties to shorting. Take TK. TK is notorious for financing companies and shorting companies. They are facing law suits because of this praxis. Infotopia is currently directly tied in with TK as TK recently has financed for Infotopia. Chances are they have shorted their shares received by Infotopia.
So as you can see there are many ties to short sellers. All of these short sellers shown in other cases are involved with Infotopia. Our CEO by removing the DTC sheets and commenting so much on shorting in his last Chairman's Message numerates shorting is much more than we think. Look out all the clues. These aren't coincidences. But, as David Killian stated; we have a serious problem at hand.
GETC, 2 PRs in same week, expecting a series of PRs.
After 6 1/2 months of a quit period, GETC has come out with two PRs in the same week and I believe we will see a series of PRs over the next weeks and months. The PRs have not said anything about what I was expecting to hear.
I assume they are bring out the small artillery first and then the heavy artillery will follow.
I believe GETC has a master plan and the shareholders will see it evolve.
Hold onto your britches.
GETC entering a new era!
Asking for an indication of first profits:
1) Don't expect a specific date from the company.
2) GETC released the information on Emerald. What is 1 Million barrels of oil, over five years. It is about $25 Million over five years, with $5 Million a year. Expenses may be in the area of $1 Million a year, more or less, and that ain't bad. The PR said 1-2 million barrels over 5 years. I am using 1 million is this example.
3) Look, in the press release of Thursday, GETC showed some of the results that are being presented later this month. Specifically that this method has increased yields. The reasons are the technology.
4) Listen to the audio interview done by oilandgasprofiles. I have the highlights posted here and on my web page. The CEO stated that they can be profitable treating a few wells per month because they operate with a low overhead. That statement I believe was referencing treating wells under the "Fee for Service". He continued to say they should be treating 10-20 wells per month after the "final field training" and 80+ when fully operational.
5) We know GETC cannot treat wells till the "final field training" is complete. I grant you the date for the "final field training" is still unknown but the 10K says they expect in the 2nd quarter.
6) The Emerald deal was press released, so I believe that GETC is confident in the results from the hearing. You cannot PR information that you are not confident in achieving. Something the SEC will frown upon.
7) GETC being the largest post creditor may be a "stroke of genius" on their part. Post creditors are first in line. If there is another post creditor, for them to want the wells, they would have to be able to make them profitable. GETC may be the only creditor that will want the wells. We know the wells need to be treated and that is expensive. And GETC has the technology to make the wells very profitable and productive.
Is there anything here that gives you a clue that profits are close?
I have a web page, not sponsored by or connected with the company, with information and links to information about GETC.
http://www.getcgreatday.homestead.com/index_getc.html -- Home Page
http://www.getcgreatday.homestead.com/DoesGETChaveWhatItTakes.html -- 10 point analysis why I believe GETC to be Undervalued.
Thanks for your interest in GETC.
Frank
***¶***Weekly Economic Indicators & Second Guessing Grenspan....
WEEKLY UPDATE FOR: May 5, 2001 by Bob Bose
Prior Week in Review:
Financial Market Highlights:
============================
05/04/01 04/27/01 %Change
S&P 500 1,266.61 1,253.05 +1.08%
Dow Jones 10,951.24 10,810.00 +1.31%
NASD Comp 2,191.67 2,075.82 +5.58%
Russell 2000 492.89 483.97 +1.84%
SOX Index 638.95 642.74 -.59%
Value Line 401.01 392.00 +2.30%
MS Growth 554.61 550.61 +.73%
MS Cyclical 548.42 545.27 +.58%
T - Bill 3.64% 3.74% -10 BP
Long Bond 5.65% 5.79% -14 BP
Gold - Oz-Near Month $266.40 $264.30 +$2.10
Silver - Oz-Near Month $4.36 $4.40 -$.04
Economic News:
==============
Labor Department Report For April Surprisingly Weak
Likely Not As Bad As Headlines - Rate Cut Probable
Second Half Recovery Still Most Likely Scenario
*March Personal Income rose +.5% - Personal Spending
Advanced +.3% - February Income revised up, Spending down
*Chicago Purchasing Managers' Index for April 38.9 -
Modest gain from March level of 35.0
*March Construction Spending rose +1.3% - Fifth Monthly
Consecutive gain - February revised up
*National Purchasing Managers' Index 43.2 for April -
Basically unchanged from March level of 43.1
*April Auto Sales slowed to 16.7 million rate - Still high
*Federal Reserve Beige Book - See Below
*March Factory Orders rose +1.8% - February revised up
*Jobless Claims rose +9,000 to 421,000 - Four Week
Moving Average rose +9,250 to 404,500
*Labor Department Report
- Unemployment Rate rises to 4.5%
- Nonfarm Payrolls fell -223,000
- Average Hourly Earnings rose +.4% to $14.22
- Average Workweek unchanged at 34.3/hr
Friday's Labor Department Employment Situation Report for
April was substantially weaker than expected, and wage
gains were again above the band of 3.5% - 4.0% year-over-
year increases that had prevailed until fairly recently.
But, there were some mitigating factors, and when viewed
in the context of the Federal Reserve Board's (FRB)
Beige Book it is very likely that the wage pressures in
the most recent report will be ignored. The net result
should be another rate cut at the upcoming May 15th
meeting of the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee
(FOMC), further strengthening the case for economic
reacceleration in the second half.
As noted above, Nonfarm Payrolls were reported to have
declined by -223,000 during April. However, the damage
wasn't quite as bad as it appears. First, the loss
for March was revised upward by +33,000. And second,
there was a -64,000 drop in construction jobs. Not
only is this number seasonally adjusted, but the official
report noted heavy rains throughout much of the country
during April. In other words, for a period that would
normally have a lot of "start-up" activity in the
construction trades, the smaller absolute number, when
"grossed up" by the seasonal adjustment process, produced
a likely aberration. In short, the weakness in the
nonfarm payrolls number is likely overstated.
However, the labor market is weakening, as is apparent
from the Beige Book. For instance, "While some districts
still mention that labor markets are tight, almost all note
that this tightness has been easing, especially in the
manufacturing sector." And, five of the districts "... have
commented that filling vacancies has become easier."
Somewhat surprisingly, the recent softness has already
translated into moderation of wage pressures, at least in
the Beige Book survey. For instance, "Upward wage pressures
have generally abated. Wages are rising very moderately
or are unchanged in most parts of the country ... " Clearly
this report contradicts the Labor Department Report, but the
FOMC will probably focus on the Beige Book and not the
wage data in the Labor Department Report as the former also
provides other price information.
>From the FOMC's viewpoint, it will appear that inflationary
pressures are muted as the Beige Book noted that "By and
large, non-energy input costs are stable, with only a few
exceptions." And, "Retail prices are steady in most
districts ... " In other words, except for energy prices,
which can't really be influenced near term by monetary policy,
the price outlook is favorable - at least over the short run.
The net result, in our opinion, will be another rate cut at the
upcoming May meeting. If data released between now and then
implies economic weakness, then another half point is the best
bet. If economic reports are more positive, then a quarter point,
and retention of the easing bias, is more likely. However,
such speculation seems like splitting hairs.
The important point is simply that the FOMC is committed to
supplying the degree of monetary stimulus necessary to "jump
start" economic growth. Our view continues to be that they will
be successful, and that the results will be apparent during the
second half. Our hope remains that they are not too successful,
as while inflationary risks do not appear to be large, they are
not non-existent. Stay tuned !
Current Weekly Calendar of Economic Data:
=========================================
Monday: Consumer Credit
Tuesday: Wholesale Trade, Q1 Productivity
Thursday: Jobless Claims
Friday: Producer Price Index, Retail Sales
Letitbe, that was my last post on SYMY...
and I haven't done any more DD on it since then....
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=67265
hi francois would you please give me your take on symy? i still own some but i dont know what to think of it anymore thanks in advance larry
¶ ZSUN+36%... SHORT SQUEEZE under way....
Telescan Merger... New shares will be issued forcing shorters to cover....
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/010503/0512.html
JMHO, F. Goelo + + +
PS: New thread on Market Makers Manipulations...
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/subject.gsp?subjectid=51166
¶*** All that is Short
Margin vs Cash Accounts
Since shorting and trading on margin are considered banking functions, they are actually governed by rules set by the Federal Reserve Board, not the SEC, although the SEC is the enforcement body. All retail shorting must occur with stock held in margin accounts, not cash accounts. Non-taxed accounts, 401k, IRA, etc., are all cash accounts.
The Mechanics of Shorting
To short a stock you borrow it (say 100 shares) from another client of your broker and sell it to a third party. Several interesting things occur here. First, you have increased (inflated) the "float" (shares held unrestricted to trade) by 100 shares because now you have created two owners of 100 shares where previously there was only one owner.
This is why, if you are short a stock and a dividend (a split is a stock dividend) is declared, you have to pay the dividend to the person who bought the borrowed shares from you. The company will pay their dividend only to the original "holder of record" but the person who bought your shares expects a dividend, too.
A Short Squeeze
A "short squeeze" occurs when the original holder demands his shares back, either by selling them or moving them into a cash (non-marginable) account. This may cause the broker who loaned the shares to "call in the shares" from the shorter if the broker cannot balance the books on all the borrowed stock, i.e., replace them with shares borrowed from another margin account.
A "short squeeze" accelerates the increase in price because it is actually a deflation or shrinking of the float. Shorted shares that are a "hedge" by institutions are hard to "Squeeze" because they are not "naked", i.e., the short could be covered by simply delivering the shares, rather than buying more shares on the open market. Retail shorters are "naked" and on margin, and subject to unlimited market risk.
Calculating Short Numbers
The Exchanges cannot tell if any shares traded are regular or borrowed. They only count the transactions. Therefore every month on the 15th day, all brokers and market makers report to each Exchange how many shares of each stock are borrowed and outstanding short.
Since a stock that is "not marginable" cannot be borrowed, it cannot be shorted by retail customers, but can be shorted by market makers, who also must report short interest to the Exchanges. This is how a non-marginable stock can have an outstanding short interest.
The important thing to remember here is that the short interest figures you see are updated only once a month, on the 15th, because the data is collected only once a month.
Credit for post to Zebra
Josef, it's part of my function, as a Chairperson...
to bring this sort of things to your attention, particularly the fact that when one clicks on your Profile, one is not seeing the Links but rather the cartoon themselves, directly...
Whether GENI goes up or down has NO effect on my temper, as I have no current position, one way or the other...
JMHO, F. Goelo + + +
Humbly stunned, FG, you, of all people, could not POSSIBLY be serious about that! I mean really. Day after day you re-post entire contents of stuff that is, under the rules you so haughtily posted to me, clearly in violation, yet you give me grief for posting LINKS to images here, with the copyright on the images NOT removed, indicating to whom they belong? Does that not strike you as even a little bit hypocritical?!?
Oh, just dawned on me, GENI not doing too well, so you're trying to displace the conflict, right? Fergitit, my last post on this ToU copyright bit. Not gonna get into a fist fight over it with you, not even going to say didly about it from here on, regardless of the additional whatever you will undoubtedly post about it.
Cheers,
Svejk
Sorry, Josef, had to delete for Personal Attack... FG
Josef, it seems you're violating the User's Agreement...
By posting information in or otherwise using any communications service, chat room, message board, newsgroup, other interactive service that may be available to you on or through this site, you agree that you will not upload, post, or otherwise distribute or facilitate distribution of any content -- including text, communications, software, images, sounds, data, or other information -- that:
infringes on any patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright, right of publicity, or other proprietary right of any party;
Aren't the cartoons showing under your Profile, protected by copyright?... Links to the cartoon might be OK but I doubt that the real thing is....
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/profile.asp?User=3654
JMHO, F. Goelo + + +
Josef, and I can't believe you're so Grumpy...
BLDP received a mention on 2 April @ $37.31...
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=69601
It's now trading @ $54.50 and apparently continuing its upward move...
http://quote.yahoo.com/q?s=bldp&d=c
JMHO, F. Goelo + + +
Humbly report, FG, can't humbly believe your reply is still on about the short position, after what I posted to you.
Whatever, it's your money, not mine.
Oh and regarding my glass being half this and yours half that...
( http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=89137 )
Hey, I just posted those links about the economy for All to consider for a balanced picture, so please, don't tell me what my glass contains, or how much, and I could not possibly care less about yours, no matter how much you think your (ehm) glass is bigger and fuller than anyone else's!
My humble opinion remains -- regardless of how big your glass, as far as I'm humbly concerned, it's full of you know what.
Cheers,
Svejk
Josef, according to GAAP your Glass is 1/2 Empty,...
while my "Pro Forma" Glass is alway 1/2 Full...
FG
Josef, GENI, yup, but atleast the short position...
is now known with reasonable accuracy: 1.58 million, or 8 days to cover at present volume...
JMHO, F. Goelo + + +
Humbly report, FG, this GENI stuff sure is getting interesting...
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=15732064
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=15732160
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly report, All, three articles I find interesting.
"Buffett Warns Company Shareholders"
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16277-2001Apr28.html
"Stocks View: Slowdown or Ugly Recession?"
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010428/bs/markets_stocks_dc_2211.html
"Hypothetically, Pro Forma May Be a Mirage"
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17929-2001Apr28.html
Cheers,
Svejk
And humbly adding one more interesting site, FG, "Today's Computerized Scan":
http://home.nyc.rr.com/ramkorolland/Commentary/scan.htm
Questions? Here is the author:
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/profile.gsp?id=1343381
Cheers,
Svejk
Humbly report, FG, here is another interesting one -- Nightly Business Report Transcript. Updated daily. Saves a lot of time -- I read the transcript in a couple of minutes instead of sitting in front of the tube for half an hour:
http://www.nbr.com/trnscrpt.htm#STORY0
Cheers,
Svejk
Josef, very interesting Website, thanks... FG
Contrary Investor Market Observations, May 2001:
http://www.contraryinvestor.com/mo.htm
***¶***Weekly Economic Indicators & Second Guessing Grenspan....
WEEKLY UPDATE FOR: April 28, 2001 by Bob Bose:
Prior Week in Review:
Financial Market Highlights:
============================
04/27/01 04/20/01 %Change
S&P 500 1,253.05 1,242.97 +.81%
Dow Jones 10,810.00 10,579.80 +2.18%
NASD Comp 2,075.82 2,163.31 -4.04%
Russell 2000 483.97 466.72 +3.70%
SOX Index 642.74 669.50 -4.00%
Value Line 392.00 385.54 +1.68%
MS Growth 550.61 531.11 +3.67%
MS Cyclical 545.27 534.01 +2.11%
T - Bill 3.74% 3.71% +3 BP
Long Bond 5.79% 5.78% +1 BP
Gold - Oz-Near Month $264.30 $265.40 -$1.10
Silver - Oz-Near Month $4.40 $4.44 -$.04
Economic News:
==============
First Quarter Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Quite Good
Accelerates From Fourth Quarter - Recession Now Unlikely
Our View Still For Recovery In Second Half
*April Consumer Confidence fell to 109.2
*Durable Goods Orders in March rose +3.0% - Excluding
Volatile Transportation sector orders fell -1.8%
*March New Home Sales rose +4.2% - Existing Home
Sales rose +4.8% - February also revised upward
*Jobless Claims rose +18,000 to 408,000 - Four Week
Moving Average rose +12,250 to 394,500 - Largest
Weekly increase since October, 1992
*Employment Cost Index rose +1.1% in 1st Qtr -
Up +4.1% year-over-year - An acceleration from 4th Qtr
*1st Qtr GDP rose +2.0% - An acceleration from 4th Qtr
Personal Consumption Price Index at +3.3% rate - Up
From 4th Qtr rate of +1.9%
*Univ. of Michigan Consumer Sentiment fell to 88.4 from end
Of March level of 91.5 - But slight bounce from mid-month
It does seem too early to declare victory for the Federal
Reserve Board's monetary policy, but the odds of a recession
have been seriously reduced given the quite positive first
quarter GDP report. Clearly the initial report is subject to
large revisions, but a revision into negative territory would
be a stretch. Therefore, an official recession would require
negative "growth" in the second and third quarters - an unlikely
outcome in our view given prior interest rate cuts and a more
stimulative fiscal policy. That's the good news.
The bad news is that the same GDP report noted a pickup in
inflationary pressures as the personal consumption price
index accelerated quite markedly from the fourth quarter rate.
In addition, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) also
pays quite a bit of attention to the Employment Cost Index (ECI)
which rose at a +4.1% year-over-year rate for the first quarter.
It is these types of pressures that we had in mind when we noted
last week that the FOMC's intermeeting move contained some risks.
One other point worth noting is that the Money Supply has been
growing at an extremely rapid rate. In this day and age not
many folks pay attention to the money supply data like they used
to, but the liquidity being supplied by the FRB is significant.
Clearly the pace can slow, but my point is that they are
pulling out all the stops to avert a recession, and appear to
have succeeded. But, in my view, not without incurring some
risk that inflationary pressures will accelerate.
In other words, it is not a given that the FOMC will lower
rates by a half point, or at all, at their May meeting. Whether
they do or not, and if so to what extent, will now depend upon
forthcoming reports - particularly those providing price
information, such as this coming Friday's Labor Department Report.
And, there is the potential for a positive report.
First, jobless claims have clearly been on a strong uptrend, so
it almost doesn't matter the specific date the survey was taken,
there should be an underlying bias toward continued softness.
And second, beginning of the year price pressures should be
out-of-the-way. In other words, pay raises that kick in at the
first of the year, making comparisons more difficult, should no
longer distort the data. Hopefully then, average hourly earnings
will not break out of their recent band, taking some pressure
off the FOMC.
Going forward, the slide in consumer confidence, and the likely
continuing rise in the unemployment rate, should mitigate wage
demands. And, of course, if the economy does reaccelerate, then
the FOMC will be more likely to use a higher assumption for
productivity growth, so they will tolerate higher wage growth
before being concerned about inflationary pressures.
Simply put, we do not want to be alarmist, but we do want to make
certain that given all the "recession talk", investors understand
that we have not entered a risk free nirvana. The FOMC has been
very, very aggressive in trying to avoid a recession. They appear
to have succeeded. If we have a non "V" recovery (still the best
bet), then inflationary pressures should be contained.
Our concern is that if we, and virtually everyone else, are wrong,
and the recovery is sharp, then inflationary pressures could
build. Stay tuned, the "all clear signal" has not yet been rung !
Current Weekly Calendar of Economic Data:
=========================================
Monday: Personal Income/Spending, Chicago Purchasing Managers' Index
Tuesday: Nat'l Purchasing Managers' Index, Construction Spending
Wednesday: Factory Orders, FRB Beige Book
Thursday: Jobless Claims
Friday: Labor Department Employment Report
Josef, I don't think it'll work for GENI,...
though, as the attempt is too contrived and the stock too volatile for investors to keep their fingers far away from the Dump button... You need at least 75% of the float in Certs to make the strategy work and that can only be achieved with some tightly held stocks...
JMHO, F. Goelo + + +
Humbly beats me, FG, but, as you know, "calling yer certs" has not accomplished what you suggest in the past (there is a pattern -- a number of companies that did "call in certs" with zero positive effect).
As you know, the market is not perfect, and there are many legal/illegal ways to get around just about any attempt to systematically influence the trading of stocks, and "calling in yer certs" is, in my humble opinion, just one of those many futile ways to attempt just that.
Read the info you provided, nothing new there. And your "beliefs" are irrelevant, as are mine.
Figure we can drop this, for now, and watch what happens. If "calling in yer certs" works in this case, I'll be the first to say I was wrong. Let's give it a while, though, I'm NOT talking days here, OK?
Cheers,
Svejk
Josef, calling Certs is removing DTC inventory...
Big shorters are known to have their ways to check on DTC inventory before shorting and during the short... If DTC shares are whittled to next to nothing, through wide spread conversion into Certs, why wouldn't that promote short covering and support or make the stock rise?...
Here is a little (slightly biased) reading that should keep you occupied for a good part of the morning...
www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=16994
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=16995
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=17003
JMHO, F. Goelo + + +
PS: I believe converting into Certs, actually does work in certain circumstances...
Humbly report, FG, no matter what the short interest, my point has been, all along, that one, "call in yer certs" will change nothing, and two, you know that.
Cheers,
Svejk
Josef, GENI, I had a long argument on SI....
to determine the extent of the short position... It seems to be either 4.5 million, my guess or 1.5 million, according to others...
The company, who receives DTC sheets weekly says 4.6 million and so does Bloomberg and Yahoo... NASD trader says 1.5 million, but it has been saying virtually the same figure since January and I wonder if they adjusted for a 3 for 1 forward split, which happened in the meantime...
JMHO, F. Goelo + + +
LaShark, TRAC has been nice to watch...
and with 8 cents Earnings in the last quarter plus share buy-back, it looks like they may be out of the woods for now...
JMHO, F. Goelo + + +
Closely watch (FONR) next week ;) e/m
Followers
|
50
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
1520
|
Created
|
08/28/00
|
Type
|
Premium
|
Moderator Francois+Goelo | |||
Assistants |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |