Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ah... memories!
Hence why the "Statute of Limitations" ploy has been tried....
.
Blah blah blah, look at the price!! Yes, "low volume", but that doesn't negate the fact that an over 200% increase is needed to not even hit the highs after CE was taken off!! THAT was supposed to be the holy grail of events that caused this supposed NSS position to be proven or not. Three months later and this hasn't even hit .04 for fck sake! What? Now, all of a sudden "covering" is going to magically happen? Lol, it's over. Bears were right on the hypothetical scenario as we would have EASILY seen things happen by now! THREE MONTHS!!! The pump is now QB? WHAT THE F HAPPENED TO THE NSS???!!!
Shareholders have long memories and know misinformation when they see—or hear—or read.
Shareholders remember some saying that the Company had no sponsoring broker, no broker application to FINRA, no clearance coming from FINRA, no OTCM application to remove CE, no removal of CE by OTCM, wrong every single time.
These details in advance of action to put Company in jeopardy while process takes place, never worked then and won’t work now.
Shareholders know.
Heres a blast from the past.
June 24, 2012
"Shareholders should also be aware, now that the deal is done, things will happen very quickly. The next year will be full of exciting news and surprising developments which the Management Team is anxious to share with you."
Thank you for your support and welcome to the “New Company.”
RTGV will take off fast overnight someday soon and many will be
left out chasing. This pull back is about done, reversal time...
Lol, the one's that stuck around expected kramer to take over the company, and revocation to happen as stated.....
Just because they hang around, can they still be trusted......
FALSE INFO!
Directly for FINRA!
Stocks Short Interest – What It Is, What It Is Not
JANUARY 25, 2023
What Is Short Interest?
To understand what short interest is, we should first talk about short sales. Put simply, a short sale involves the sale of a stock an investor does not own. When an investor engages in short selling, two things can happen. If the price of the stock drops, the short seller can buy the stock at the lower price and make a profit. If the price of the stock rises, the short seller will lose money. An investor may engage in short selling for many reasons, such as to profit from a decline in the price of a stock or to hedge the risk of other positions.
To open a short position, an investor places a short sale order with their brokerage firm in a stock that the investor does not own. This is done in a margin account. Because the investor does not own the shares, the brokerage firm will look to “locate” shares prior to executing the short sale. These shares may be identified in the brokerage firm’s inventory, the margin accounts of other customers or another source. Once the trade is executed, the investor’s margin account will show the proceeds of the sale. Ultimately, the investor must obtain these securities to close the position. Until this occurs, the investor’s account will reflect a short position. To close the position, the investor can purchase the stock in the market, which they hope will be at a lower price than they sold the shares short.
“Short interest” is a snapshot of the total open short positions existing on the books and records of brokerage firms for all equity securities on a given settlement date. Short interest data is collected for all stocks—both those that are listed and traded on an exchange and those that are traded over-the-counter (OTC). FINRA and U.S. exchange rules require that brokerage firms report short interest data to FINRA on a per-security basis for all customer and proprietary firm accounts twice a month, around the middle of the month and again at the end of each month.
For stocks listed on a U.S. exchange, FINRA shares the data with the listing exchange. FINRA also publishes the short interest reports it collects from member firms for all exchange-listed and over-the-counter equity securities on its Equity Short Interest Data page free for the broader investing public.
What Short Interest Is Not
In addition to short interest data, FINRA also publishes short sale volume data. The daily short sale volume data provides aggregated volume by security for all off-exchange short sale trades. This data excludes any trading activity that is not publicly disseminated and is not consolidated with exchange data.
Some market participants mistakenly conclude that the bimonthly short interest data is understated because the Short Sale Volume Daily File reflects volume that is much larger than the positions reported as short interest. However, short interest position data does not—and is not intended to—equate to the daily short sale volume data posted on FINRA’s website.
The short interest data is just a snapshot that reflects short positions held by brokerage firms at a specific moment in time on two discrete days each month. The Short Sale Volume Daily File reflects the aggregate volume of trades within certain parameters executed as short sales on individual trade dates. Therefore, while the two data sets are related in that short sale volume activity may ultimately result in a reportable short interest position, they are not the same.
Investors might establish short positions in a security that continue to exist for varying lengths of time, which can result in a short position being represented in one of the data sets but not the other. For example, an investor might sell a security short and purchase shares to close the position on the same trade date. That position would not appear in the short interest data, though the short sale transaction would appear on the Short Sale Volume Daily File.
On the other hand, an investor might hold a short position open for days or weeks, perhaps as a hedge against another position. While the short sale transaction that established that short position would appear in the Short Sale Volume Daily File only on the date the short sale transaction occurred, the short position would continue to be reflected in the short interest data for as long as the position remained open.
LEARN MORE ABOUT SHORT SALE VOLUME DATA.
What Should I Know About Short Interest Data?
Some websites might redistribute the Short Sale Volume Daily File and refer to the data as “short interest,” but this is incorrect because, as explained above, short sale volume data is not the equivalent of short interest position data. In addition, the specific information that an investor sees depends on the source. Often, the data shown on free investor sites represents the results of a proprietary calculation and not the raw short interest data that FINRA and the exchanges disseminate. Different data providers may use different methodologies for calculating and displaying short sale information that are beyond FINRA’s control. Investors are encouraged to seek information from the data provider to understand how the data displayed is derived.
——-
https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-051019
.
There we go again with the assumptions. Building business? Prove it? Is there ANY evidence that business is “being built”? One new contract? Any revenue? Any reduction in debt? ANYTHING????
Just because they’re in court doesn’t mean they can’t operate as a business. They’ve only had a couple years of down time to generate one new contract….. It should be EASY to prove this is a successful, viable business that’s building.
It was noted and documented, and more than 1.
I see MMs manipulating price down with fraud while company builds business and fighting against sec OIP which is a waste of time
Fighting unnecessary delays to uplist after just completing 211 all and CE drop
Fighting the clock to uplist while fraud brings the pps down
Guess they do t have time to jump to your whim
Why aren’t longs asking relevant questions about their investment? Blind trust? REALLY?!????
Amazingly, not one soul is angry about the pump orchestrated by one guy who immediately disappeared after the price spiked….. NONE of y’all see this? It happened RIGHT in front of your eyes!!!
And what has happened to the price since then?
And the 211 when DBMM stated it was in process and DBMM succeeded
For those that did absolutely ZERO research into the uplisting process….. the date matters because the price has to be above .01 for 30 consecutive days immediately PRIOR to the application….
The company never announced that they filed. They only announced an INTENTION to file. Therefore, if the application wasn’t filed and the price subsequently dropped below .01 - they…..are….no…..longer….eligible…..
Oops.
The date sort of matters a LOT.
Was proof shown when the 211 was filed? Hihi
Sure it will. EASILY. What WON’T happen is proof being shown to you of a filed application.
This reminds me of the chatter right before the CE dropped…
Everyone against dbmm NEEDS to know all the details of the up list ,just dying for details.
Ppl are tense and scared.
Why’s it matter what the date of application is ? OTCM takes as long as they need to file. So when it was filed is Irrelevant!
Company said they where filing and just like everything else they said they would do they have !
Good luck buying 10 mill on the ask. Won’t happen. Lol not at these prices
DBMM - I’ll buy 10,000,000 shares at the ask immediately upon seeing a date stamped receipt or confirmation of the application filing within 5 trading days (a whole week) of this post. If you filed it, this request could be honored in less than 5 minutes.
No one disputes that they WERE eligible when you were told they would uplist. But an application also needed to be filed….. ALL the facts (not just the cherry picked ones) matter.
Care to verify that application? You know as well as everyone that no application means no uplist. Plain and simple. Which could present a VERY VERY strong case for fraud.
Shareholders know pps goes up very quickly , has and will.
Patience always has resulted in positive action.
LTIs in it to win it.
No schite.....and now, the dump phase has brought it back under a penny.....
OTCQB?? uh oh.....
Simple answer. NO. period.
If they have already applied
1. Now—no, since bid is less than .01
2. If they have already applied and met the 30 day requirement, all they need to do is have the bid be over.01 on the day they are approved.
That said, who knows how long the process is valid for.
Go DBMM!
They SCARED "Fact is that shorties still have to cover their huge NSS position in $DBMM, facts are that they'll do it and it will cost them a lot buck$.
Time is in favor of long & loyal $DBMM shareholders and Alpine Securities case could be the signal to start a huge run...mixed with OTCQB New Tier :)"
Did they actually file the 211? As we heard DBMM was lying, blah blah? And then BAM!
I suggest contacting Maranda Fritz or Linda Perry WiththatQuestion.
Wouldn't they know?
$DBMM Management stands behind its results to this point and the patience required for the achievements thus far and going forward.
There have been naysayers since the beginning of the mitigating circumstances who have damaged the Company and its shareholders, non-stop for years , despite the circumstances, many directed by others.
That perhaps is the last mitigating circumstance to be eliminated. For now, simply ignore the misinformation and proven incorrect opinions.
Be assured the Company’s timeline is progressing with no missteps. We ask our shareholders to stay the course and have patience.
$DBMM'ers have my permission to copy my post and send it to Maranda Fritz and Linda Perry.
Source: http://www.dbmmgroup.com/shareholder-update-march-13-2023/
That doesn't answer the question...
DID THEY ACTUALLY FILE?
$DBMM contacted|OTCM Already Responded they will work w|$DBMM early in the New Year to effect the transition to the higher platform
Source:http://www.dbmmgroup.com/shareholders-update-december-28-2022
It has been a short time since the CE was removed by OTC Markets and the Company’s next step is to improve its trading platform with an Uplisting to OTCQB, a more prestigious arena.
The Company suggests shareholders consider the progress made already from sponsorship by a prospective, now the named, market maker via the Form 211 to FINRA to the removal of the CE after meeting the criteria of each step, to a decision to Uplist with all the boxes checked.
DBMM Management stands behind its results to this point and the patience required for the achievements thus far and going forward. There have been naysayers since the beginning of the mitigating circumstances who have damaged the Company and its shareholders, non-stop for years , despite the circumstances, many directed by others. That perhaps is the last mitigating circumstance to be eliminated. For now, simply ignore the misinformation and proven incorrect.
Source: http://www.dbmmgroup.com/shareholder-update-march-13-2023/
No Revocation Anymore?
Uplist instead.
Great Stuff
So did the company file for OTCQB as was claimed many times????
<crickets>
Funders wait,to ensure $DBMM Isn't revoked by the Commission.
The Company has the present ability to move forward to continue to grow its business for the benefit of its shareholders and asks that the Commission affirm the decision of the Law Judge denying revocation of its registration.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the Company submits that revocation of its registration is not necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors, and that the denial of revocation should be affirmed.
Dated: March 26, 2021
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/Maranda Fritz_____________________ Maranda E. Fritz
Maranda E. Fritz PC
335 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Source: https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-2021-03-26-respondent-appellees-brief.pdf
Great Stuff
9 wins
3+Years Compliance
Deterrent
Kramer
$DBMM
$GTII
$HPIL
HUD
DBMM has contacted OTCW|Meets all criteria for OTCOB lower platform.
OTCW hasn't already responded that they will work with the Company early in the New Year to effect the transition to the lower platform
Source:http://www.dbmmgroup.com/shareholders-update-december-28-2022
Well. There's the answer.
When the Update stated the pps was over $0.02 and met all criteria to Uplist.
Shareholders know facts of chronology matters.
Misinforformation consistently have conflated timelines to make inaccurate statements, while deliberately depressing pps by manipulation.
The Company has provided the factual info in filings, Court Documents and Updates.
When the Update stated the pps was over $0.02 and met all criteria to Uplist. Note point in time and call out false info. Note deliberate chronology avoidance conflating timeline to present.
Shareholders aren’t stupid, nor scared.
Meanwhile,in Court:DOE resorts to ad hominem attacks on $DBMM & Management.
DOE Br. at 25-28.
$DBMM has obtained resources to complete the re-audit, bring the Company current, & continue its timely filings,
DOE once again rejects the Law Judge’s analysis and conclusion that the Company explained the reasons for the reporting violations and demonstrated that it had taken effective measures to ensure timely filing.
The Company undertook and successfully completed the re-audit,
while also addressing and resolving the litigation. Having resolved those issues, the Company then ensured, for three years, the timely filing of its periodic reports. Its assurances are more than credible; they have been borne out by years of filings.
Source: https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-2021-03-26-respondent-appellees-brief.pdf
Great Stuff
9 wins
Timely Filings Matter= Sometimes
Late Filings Matter= Sometimes
Delays Matter = Sometimes
Wild claims are made but NEVER PROVEN with factual information from verifiable resources…..
An interesting statement
Made by someone saying that DBMM meets all criteria to uplist to OTCQB….
Care to verify that statement with factually accurate links? Or is that just some of the “DD that’s not DD at all”?
Source: https://fintel.io/s/us/dbmm $DBMM 2014 Trade Data|Notable Dates What passes for "DD" on this board is not "DD" at all. Wild claims are made but NEVER PROVEN with factual information from verifiable sources.
Date(2014)--------(Total Vol)
Nov 26 ------------904,455,961
Jun 23 -------------774,052,890
Jun 17 --------------336,453,305
Jun 03 --------------222,700,162
Jun 02 --------------374,062,639
May 06 -------------257,003,282
May 05 -------------144,298,331
May 02 -------------602,541,670
Feb 26 -------------254,325,277
Feb 21 -------------283,337,500
Jan 10 --------------265,541,278
Friday:250K ActualVol | 30.78%ShortVol
Date--------- Actual Vol + Short Vol = Total Volume (%)
03-17----------,,,250,556 + ,,,,111,411 = ,,,361,967 (30.78%)
03-16----------,,,148,550 + ,,,383,235 = ,,,531,785 (72.07%)
03-15----------,,,658,713 + ,,,912,067 = 1,570,780 (58.06%)
03-14----------2,154,384 + 2,079,774 = 4,234,158 (49.12%)
03-13----------,,,345,406 + ,,,166,671 = ,,,512,077 (32.55%)
03-10----------,,,435,018 + ,,,228,000 = ,,,663,018 (34.39%)
03-09----------,,,602,500 + ,,,181,000 = ,,,783,500 (23.10%)
03-08----------,,,474,975 + ,,,283,800 = ,,,758,775 (37.40%)
03-07----------1,657,570 + ,,,372,200 = 2,029,770 (18.34%)
03-06----------2,158,097 + ,,,660,400 = 2,818,497 (23.43%)
03-03----------2,502,869 + 3,179,283 = 5,682,152 (55.95%)
03-02----------1,032,955 + 1,138,551 = 2,171,506 (52.43%)
03-01----------,,,841,901 + 1,570,300 = 2,412,201 (65.10%)
02-28----------1,682,785 + 1,212,490 = 2,895,275 (41.88%)
02-27----------1,008,739 + 4,428,336 = 5,437,075 (81.45%)
02-24----------3,802,036 + 5,563,431 = 9,365,467 (59.40%)
02-23----------2,895,110 + 4,168,839 = 7,063,949 (59.02%)
02-22----------1,587,932 + 1,923,944 = 3,511,876 (54.78%)
02-21----------,,,963,502 + ,,,280,705 = 1,244,207 (22.56%)
02-17----------1,251,944 + 2,512,467 = 3,764,411 (66.74%)
02-16----------,,,989,934 + ,,,521,208 = 1,511,142 (34.49%)
02-15----------,,,843,133 + 1,637,467 = 2,480,600 (66.01%)
02-14----------1,039,339 + 1,291,207 = 2,330,546 (55.40%)
02-13----------,,,537,321 + 1,129,272 = 1,666,593 (66.76%)
02-10----------1,361,458 + 2,695,714 = 4,057,172 (66.44%)
02-09----------1,419,821 + 1,903,723 = 3,323,544 (57.28%)
02-08----------3,194,954 + 1,405,570 = 4,600,524 (30.55%)
02-07----------2,108,051 + 1,654,554 = 3,762,605 (43.97%)
02-03----------3,358,376 + 2,945,815 = 6,304,191 (46.73%)
02-02----------2,051,760 + 2,934,610 = 4,986,370 (58.85%)
02-01----------2,692,535 + 1,689,268 = 4,381,803 (38.55%)
01-31----------1,805,518 + 1,239,665 = 3,045,183 (40.71%)
01-30----------4,223,018 + 4,053,201 = 8,276,219 (48.97%)
01-27----------1,360,961 + 6,064,153 = 7,425,114 (81.67%)
01-26----------1,120,627 +....635,405 = 1,756,032 (36.18%)
01-25----------2,344,285 + 1,348,685 = 3,692,970 (36.52%)
01-24----------2,231,290 + 1,672,375 = 3,903,665 (42.84%)
01-23----------1,416,744 + 1,665,948 = 3,082,692 (54.04%)
01-20----------2,107,286 + 3,113,768 = 5,221,054 (59.64%)
01-19----------1,390,984 + 1,268,910 = 2,659,894 (47.71%)
01-18----------1,751,209 + ...644,126 =.2,395,335 (27.73%)
01-17----------1,102,047 + 1,499,313 = 2,601,360 (57.64%)
01-13----------1,602,665 + 1,637,917 = 3,240,582 (50.54%)
01-12----------1,205,867 + ...580,770 = 1,786,637 (32.51%)
01-11----------1,277,319 + ....701941 = 1,979,260 (35.46%)
01-10----------...927,177 + 1,650,058 = 2,577,235 (64.02%)
01-09----------1,745,674 + 2,176,440 = 3,922,114 (55.49%)
01-06----------1,251,350 + 1,471,444 = 2,722,794 (54.04%)
01-05----------1,511,898 + 2,900,670 = 4,412,568 (65.74%)
01-04----------2,406,334 + 2,535,351 = 4,941,685 (51.31%)
Source: https://fintel.io/ss/us/dbmm
Accurate Source As of 01/2023
So No Revocation? OTCQB Uplist Instead?
DBMM has contacted OTCM|Meets all criteria for OTCQB higher platform.
OTCM has already responded that they will work with the Company early in the New Year to effect the transition to the higher platform
Source:http://www.dbmmgroup.com/shareholders-update-december-28-2022
It has been a short time since the CE was removed by OTC Markets and the Company’s next step is to improve its trading platform with an Uplisting to OTCQB, a more prestigious arena.
The Company suggests shareholders consider the progress made already from sponsorship by a prospective, now the named, market maker via the Form 211 to FINRA to the removal of the CE after meeting the criteria of each step, to a decision to Uplist
with all the boxes checked.
DBMM Management stands behind its results to this point and the patience required for the achievements thus far and going forward. There have been naysayers since the beginning of the mitigating circumstances who have damaged the Company and its shareholders, non-stop for years , despite the circumstances, many directed by others. That perhaps is the last mitigating circumstance to be eliminated. For now, simply ignore the misinformation and proven incorrect.
Source: http://www.dbmmgroup.com/shareholder-update-march-13-2023/
No Revocation Anymore?
Uplist instead.
Great Stuff
DOE resorts to ad hominem attacks on $DBMM & Management. DOE Br. at 25-28.
$DBMM has obtained resources to complete the re-audit, bring the Company current, & continue its timely filings,
DOE once again rejects the Law Judge’s analysis and conclusion that the Company explained the reasons for the reporting violations and demonstrated that it had taken effective measures to ensure timely filing.
The Company undertook and successfully completed the re-audit,
while also addressing and resolving the litigation. Having resolved those issues, the Company then ensured, for three years, the timely filing of its periodic reports. Its assurances are more than credible; they have been borne out by years of filings.
Source: https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-2021-03-26-respondent-appellees-brief.pdf
Great Stuff
9 wins
Timely Filings Matter= Sometimes
Late Filings Matter= Sometimes
Delays Matter = Sometimes
They did let it run…
A LOT.
Fact is that shorties still have to cover their huge NSS position in $DBMM, facts are that they'll do it and it will cost them a lot buck$.
Time is in favor of long & loyal $DBMM shareholders and Alpine Securities case could be the signal to start a huge run...mixed with OTCQB New Tier :)
They probably should have let Dbmm run when the CE came off. I feel like with 3 months of suppression … something is going to burst HARD …
Judgement day is coming
Why trade in the US then, if it’s so crooked?!
If anyone doesn’t have to, it’s Canadian’s.
No one is forcing Canadian residents to buy DBMM stock and trade in US Stock markets!
If they don’t like it, they don’t have to trade here!
Followers
|
1005
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
32
|
Posts (Total)
|
351840
|
Created
|
01/31/06
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators luvthemtrainz Jetmek_03052 johnydollar Stock_Barber 1vman |
DBMM delivers marketing value, brand consultancy and analytics in the digital economy through its brand, DIGITAL CLARITY.
* Large multinational companies were clients. Mercedes, Xerox, ProCook, Silverstone, H.R.Owen and many more
* $3+ million in possible funding (a right of first refusal only)
1. On Nov 15,2013 the SEC sent Notice to DBMM that its Auditor had been sanctioned and no longer approved public company Auditor..
2. DBMM was 2 weeks from filing its 2013 10-K and thus had to re-audit 3 years.
3. Due to re-audit work, Asher, one of the lenders, could not convert. Asher filed a lawsuit,
4. DBMM completed its re-audit in Sept. 2014 and filed 5 reports the same day, then requisite reports through May 2015.
5. DBMM unable to raise capital blaming Asher relentless litigation and was unable to file thereafter.
6. SEC suspended DBMM, started an Administrative Proceeding against DBMM to revoke DBMM shares registration and DBMM started trading OTC*PINK Current Market to OTC Grey Market.
7. DBMM fought SEC Administrative Proceeding.
8. Finally, DBMM identified new funding.
9. DBMM filed Audited Consolidated Super 10 K (Annual reports) for 3 years (2015, 2016 and 2017).
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/conv_pdf?id=12787576&guid=tHTeUq6BxCaQith
10. On June 18, 2018 the Legal Proceeding entitled Asher Enterprises, Inc. v. Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc . has been settled by the parties.
11. A quarter MILLION Dollars was invested in late 2017
12. July 2018, as DBMM filed Audited Consolidate Super 10 K (Annual reports) for 3 years (2015, 2016 and 2017) and Quarterly reports for Q1, Q2 and Q3 of 2018, OTC Markets website NO LONGER shows DBMM as delinquent filer. OTC Markets websites NOW SHOWS DBMM as SEC*REPORTING.
13. ONLY thing left is SEC Administrative Proceeding which started in May 2017.
14. Various stays from SCOTUS case for over 100 cases.
15. Nov 12,2018 Initial Decision vacated and oral presentations agreed and scheduled for Jan 15 2019.
16. Gov't shutdown requires new scheduling.
17. DBMM has been compliant since June, 2018.
18. April 10, 2019 12 million new shares were issued to 757,718,631 in total.
19. New hearing happened on March 21st
https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljorders/2019/ap-6449.pdf
20. On Nov 12, 2019, SEC Judge DISMISSED OIP against DBMM in Initial Decision. "In conclusion, the violations alleged in the OIP are proven, but no available sanction is appropriate. Thus, this proceeding will be dismissed."
21. Sanction challenged.
https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljdec/2019/id1389cff.pdf
22. DBMM WON VERDICT.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2023/33-11198.pdf
NOTE: The FINRA Daily Short Report does NOT represent naked shorts! Boards where it is used to try to trick inexperienced investors signal a SERIOUS RED FLAG! Read FINRA's own explanation below
https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/short-interest
What Short Interest Is Not
In addition to short interest data, FINRA also publishes short sale volume data. The daily short sale volume data provides aggregated volume by security for all off-exchange short sale trades. This data excludes any trading activity that is not publicly disseminated and is not consolidated with exchange data.
Some market participants mistakenly conclude that the bimonthly short interest data is understated because the Short Sale Volume Daily File reflects volume that is much larger than the positions reported as short interest. However, short interest position data does not—and is not intended to—equate to the daily short sale volume data posted on FINRA’s website.
The short interest data is just a snapshot that reflects short positions held by brokerage firms at a specific moment in time on two discrete days each month. The Short Sale Volume Daily File reflects the aggregate volume of trades within certain parameters executed as short sales on individual trade dates. Therefore, while the two data sets are related in that short sale volume activity may ultimately result in a reportable short interest position, they are not the same.
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |