Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Not necessarily because they met the uplist requirements and usually you get a pop above 0.01 on the announcement. They would have 6 months to hit 0.01.
Charts are meaningless to me on heavily manipulated, thinly traded Pink stocks. These are news/event-driven stocks.
My understanding is it can take up to 6 months. However, while there are rules to being eligible, at the end of the day the decision is completely subjective. DBMM neither meets the objective OR likely subjective requirements any longer.
Yet a company that is CLEARLY on the ropes financially formally announced to shareholders and potential shareholders an “intention” do do something without following through when they COULD have…. Now just WHY would THAT be???
To manipulate the share price perhaps?
Ok…will they kick them back down to pink if can’t get back above .01? That’s what they do on NQ when can’t stay above $1…
The MACD is about to pop upwards. Anyday. Look at the charts.
We need the uplist!!!!!!
If they submitted and they met the requirements they generally uplist it from my experience. Its not a set rule because the market is dynamic. Same thing like NASDAQ minimum $1.00 rules you get extensions.
Lol i dont know. I have had other stocks uplist and most are 40 to 60 days. You think this will uplisted next month. otcm is a private organization so there generally is no set time limits. They could take 6 months but its been excessively long based on other pink current stocks. $ARGQ when they did their uplist was about 45 days and that was maybe 6 years ago.
How do they qualify now that pps been below .01 for some time now?
Agreed. There are one or two die hard holdouts who refuse to open their eyes.
The reason the filing date of the application is important is because they actually issued a formal statement to shareholders that they “intended” to file for uplist. AT THE TIME OF THAT PUBLIC STATEMENT, THEY WERE DULLY QUALIFIED AND ABLE TO UPLIST. (That’s important)
IF they DIDN’T file, then it’s a VERY strong case for fraud. It could easily be construed that this was a statement to increase share price by intentionally mis-leading investors into buying or holding based on a feasible scenario.
There’s no way they can uplist now. Those saying they are currently qualified to do so are, themselves, engaged in fraud. But the original statement came from the company. A formal statement claiming an intention under these circumstances, seems curious in the first place. It would be different had they announced an intention PRIOR to being eligible to satisfy the intention.
This company better hope they don’t draw the “real” scrutiny of the SEC. There’s a whole lot to unpack in these public statements.
Why should one be provided?
Where are the links proving the naked short position in DBMM? Where are the links proving that Alpine naked shorted DBMM? Where are the links proving Kramer naked shorted DBMM?
All those accusations and claims have ZERO links provided that PROVE them!
DBMM
Rubbish. You got a link for all that.
tlo.
Maybe they submitted it in February.
They obviously did not submit the application. It doesn't take more than 60 days for approval its been what 110 days from that December PR?
Everyone except the truly delusional or the ones trying to re-pump a burnt p’n’d has known it’s “game over” for a long time.
Once again, we see merely an "investor update" in regard to the fresh "90 day extension" by the SEC Board of Commissioners. Will Linda EVER step up to the plate and direct a lawsuit be filed against them?
Then again, DBMM has NO MONEY with which to bring a lawsuit. And DBMM would get CRUSHED in court. Says right in the regulations that the Board can take as long as they like to decide.
Meanwhile, the stock price dwindles back down to where it belongs - solidly under a penny and unable to up list to the OTCQB.
This company is dying on the vine and Linda is helpless to stop it.
Real investors can read OTCM rules for uplist. There is no way of knowing if or when DBMM did or is going to submit the application because of lack of communication. Facts are as of today. If DBMM filed the application, they no longer meet rule requirements. The share price has to be above .01 the day the application is approved. It is not at present. It is possible they met the 30-day rule, but that would be irrelevant as of today. If they have yet to file, then the price would have to get above .01 for 30 consecutive days now. If they filled the only chance of approval, it is getting the share price above the .01 threshold before application is decided.
This is not debatable. It is OTCM rules. Doesn't mean that DBMM is not going to uplist. Means its not happening any time soon.
And who said GAME OVER? Naked Short STRESSING as QB is next then more news on DBMM schedule!
Imagine winning “9 times” and STILL managing to lose the game. How pathetic would THAT be?
The only ones who get rich are the ones who sell too soon.
I'm more interested in what Alpine has been doing in connection with the Kramers who have a history with DBMM than I am about an up list.
Hi Linda!
I have it here stamped in invisible ink just like the DBMM 211 filing when we heard NEVER EVER then BAM FINRA cleared DBMM 211
"I TOLD YOU SO 9 TIME"
Judge said GO
Came off Grey
Pink Current
211 filed
211 accepted
10k in
.01 or higher for 50 plus days
8K in BOOM
Then the CE DROPPED
DA BOOM!
DBMM - please post the date stamped receipt of the uplist application. Thanks.
Its about to be proven like I said.... WAIT FOR IT! IT WON'T BE MUCH LONGER!
Then someone can say I TOLD YOU! once we all have our answer not before!
It is my opinion that there will be some DBMM info when ALPINE gets a full audit of what's been going on there. The DTC will also have to make available how Alpine traded stocks legal or illegal...
TIC TOK TIC TOK!
Hi Linda!
So, there was nothing that proved Kramers did FRAUD on HUD until they got caught.
So, there was no proof Kramers did FRAUD on HPI! in 2022 until they got caught.
So, there was no proof Kramers did FRAUD on VNU@ in 2022 until they got caught.
I would NEVER make excuses or defend the Kramers
Lol yeah nice I can't stop laughing. Or the 211 will never ever....
Glad we shareholders were right!
So there is NOTHING that proves DBMM was naked shorted by Alpine, Kramer or ANYONE??? Just as I thought.
There is only..."Well, they were associated with DBMM so they MIGHT have done it"!
OK. Great. You know how DBMM is SUPPOSEDLY taking names of people they think are "bashing" them? I sure hope Alpine is "taking names" of people who are saying THEY did things there is NO PROOF of!
It would be HYSTERICAL to see people who challenged them WITHOUT PROOF have their clocks cleaned in court.
Excellent Post!
Couldn’t agree more!!
Further more I do not work for the Kramers or Alpine but I am VERY excited to see what gets to see some daylight when they go through the meatgrinder. Everyone should be happy about this! THE TIE IN happens when they get audited on everything they right and wrong!
TIC TOK!
It is my opinion that when Alpine is investigated by the NSCC and FINRA that they will be looking into everything they did wrong and do a proper share accounting of all non covered legal/illegal short positions will be part of it. Therefor it will be revealed if there is any fraud committed against DBMM since the Kramers used Alpine as their MM. The fact that Alpines legal team walked on them is a great indication that they don't even want to deal with their mess.
We should be happy this is happening to get some closure here finally not complaining about the process about to take place.
Hi Linda! TIC TOK!
Yet ANOTHER reference to something that IS NOT EVEN RELATED TO DBMM!
Where is THE TIE IN? Where is THE PROOF that this is related to DBMM?
There's NO MENTION of DBMM in ANY of the links/info that is being posted!
ANY "tie in" in DBMM looks like it is in the imagination of the poster, because it CERTAINLY CANNOT be VERIFIED by any viable and provable information!
Next?
Sure and it will be at .0033 tomorrow.
Good luck , let us know if you ever catch a share!
Where’s it say common? It says concentrated short position
My buy order is at .0055. And that’s over-priced. But if it fills, I’m confident that some sucker will buy it back at .007 and call it a “good deal”.
But what if it’s a truth you don’t agree with? Will there be more explanations, justifications, fabrications and excuses?
Two buys first of the day. 10k at .0086, 10k at .0095 pretrade. They put both on the bid lower. Shocker
Like I previously stated the truth will come out once and for all very soon!
Lets all sit back with some yummy popcorn and watch it all be revealed!
Until that happens no one here is right and all opinion indeed. Soon we will have facts!
Fun fact! Alpines Legal team walked away from them great start!
Hi Linda TIC TOK!
Alpine holds common shorts in GTII... how does that take the leap to NAKED shorts?
Baseless speculation!
And then there is the second HUGE leap to DBMM also being naked shorted by Alpine because DBMM took out death spiral loans from Kramer a decade ago...
Some conspiracy theories aren't credible... and others aren't even possible...
.
The gig is up! And it's up to everyone to take a stand and save what little is left of the markets.
Hi Linda!
We will find out for Alpine yes but there are many more MM's to go after that!
Hi Linda don't forget...
https://danielsolis.cz/counterfeiting-stock-2-0/
Twit dropping NSS attack advocates faster than you can count. Waking up to accounts blocked. No reasons given.
Everyone on a nerve apparently. Crooks losing money cause retail fighting back.
FactsKramer improperly bought 2bill+shares of LaidlawEnergyGroup Inc & sold them to investors(2006-2010) Facts Kramer bought & sold 1bill+ unregistered shares of Bederra Corp that had been misappropriated by that company’s transfer agent (2009-2010)Source: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sec-pennystock-settlement-idUSBRE9AO11420131125 $DBMM -1 LaidLaw Energy Group Inc (same Link) -6 SpartaCo alleges -8 $DBMM $HPIL $GTII HUD $VNUE Any more?Asking for a Friend Minimum 4 Fraud Cases!
Source: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sec-pennystock-settlement-idUSBRE9AO11420131125
Let's Do a little Counting Exercise Kramer Defrauded:
Source:https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-event-11.pdf
Bederra Corp -7
Source: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sec-pennystock-settlement/new-york-penny-stock-financier-settles-sec-charges-idUSBRE9AO11420131125
VVG|KBM|Asher|Toxic Debt Loans around the country
Defendant Seth Kramer is President of KBM |
Defendant Curt Kramer is President of Asher and VVG
Source: https://casetext.com/case/sparta-commercial-servs-inc-v-vis-vires-grp-inc
"Not Kramer but a Fraud Asscociate" (Moot)!
"IT was a Kazillion Years Ago" (Moot)
"Evidence" (moot)!
ALJ Carol Fox Foelak (moot)!
CE drop (moot)!
Timely Filings (moot)
Are Late Filings also Moot? Asking for a Friend.
Happy Belated Groundhogs Day!
02/02/23
Dear Linda @ DBMM HQ Hi I did some more digging on market fraud over the weekend here is an article on Counterfeiting stock.
Please forward it to your team if they haven't seen it yet.
Best!
https://danielsolis.cz/counterfeiting-stock-2-0/
Followers
|
1005
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
50
|
Posts (Total)
|
351858
|
Created
|
01/31/06
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators luvthemtrainz Jetmek_03052 johnydollar Stock_Barber 1vman |
DBMM delivers marketing value, brand consultancy and analytics in the digital economy through its brand, DIGITAL CLARITY.
* Large multinational companies were clients. Mercedes, Xerox, ProCook, Silverstone, H.R.Owen and many more
* $3+ million in possible funding (a right of first refusal only)
1. On Nov 15,2013 the SEC sent Notice to DBMM that its Auditor had been sanctioned and no longer approved public company Auditor..
2. DBMM was 2 weeks from filing its 2013 10-K and thus had to re-audit 3 years.
3. Due to re-audit work, Asher, one of the lenders, could not convert. Asher filed a lawsuit,
4. DBMM completed its re-audit in Sept. 2014 and filed 5 reports the same day, then requisite reports through May 2015.
5. DBMM unable to raise capital blaming Asher relentless litigation and was unable to file thereafter.
6. SEC suspended DBMM, started an Administrative Proceeding against DBMM to revoke DBMM shares registration and DBMM started trading OTC*PINK Current Market to OTC Grey Market.
7. DBMM fought SEC Administrative Proceeding.
8. Finally, DBMM identified new funding.
9. DBMM filed Audited Consolidated Super 10 K (Annual reports) for 3 years (2015, 2016 and 2017).
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/conv_pdf?id=12787576&guid=tHTeUq6BxCaQith
10. On June 18, 2018 the Legal Proceeding entitled Asher Enterprises, Inc. v. Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc . has been settled by the parties.
11. A quarter MILLION Dollars was invested in late 2017
12. July 2018, as DBMM filed Audited Consolidate Super 10 K (Annual reports) for 3 years (2015, 2016 and 2017) and Quarterly reports for Q1, Q2 and Q3 of 2018, OTC Markets website NO LONGER shows DBMM as delinquent filer. OTC Markets websites NOW SHOWS DBMM as SEC*REPORTING.
13. ONLY thing left is SEC Administrative Proceeding which started in May 2017.
14. Various stays from SCOTUS case for over 100 cases.
15. Nov 12,2018 Initial Decision vacated and oral presentations agreed and scheduled for Jan 15 2019.
16. Gov't shutdown requires new scheduling.
17. DBMM has been compliant since June, 2018.
18. April 10, 2019 12 million new shares were issued to 757,718,631 in total.
19. New hearing happened on March 21st
https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljorders/2019/ap-6449.pdf
20. On Nov 12, 2019, SEC Judge DISMISSED OIP against DBMM in Initial Decision. "In conclusion, the violations alleged in the OIP are proven, but no available sanction is appropriate. Thus, this proceeding will be dismissed."
21. Sanction challenged.
https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljdec/2019/id1389cff.pdf
22. DBMM WON VERDICT.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2023/33-11198.pdf
NOTE: The FINRA Daily Short Report does NOT represent naked shorts! Boards where it is used to try to trick inexperienced investors signal a SERIOUS RED FLAG! Read FINRA's own explanation below
https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/short-interest
What Short Interest Is Not
In addition to short interest data, FINRA also publishes short sale volume data. The daily short sale volume data provides aggregated volume by security for all off-exchange short sale trades. This data excludes any trading activity that is not publicly disseminated and is not consolidated with exchange data.
Some market participants mistakenly conclude that the bimonthly short interest data is understated because the Short Sale Volume Daily File reflects volume that is much larger than the positions reported as short interest. However, short interest position data does not—and is not intended to—equate to the daily short sale volume data posted on FINRA’s website.
The short interest data is just a snapshot that reflects short positions held by brokerage firms at a specific moment in time on two discrete days each month. The Short Sale Volume Daily File reflects the aggregate volume of trades within certain parameters executed as short sales on individual trade dates. Therefore, while the two data sets are related in that short sale volume activity may ultimately result in a reportable short interest position, they are not the same.
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |