Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yeah. People should ACTUALLY READ that AP. It is about Alpine seeking to be relieved from the Required Deposit (Margin) requirements when trading penny stocks (like DBMM).
Not that I think they should be. But THAT is what that AP is about.
I don't know if this HAM fellow is spoofing this particular AP or not. I suspect he is, because other people have parroted it on this board.
Think anyone is covering for alpine? I’m sure it will take time for sec / dtcc figure out how to cover their own backside in all this but it’s public knowledge now, can’t hide now. Dtcc gave the smoking gun short position
Charges have been laid ,
Every one for themselves now!
Rumor from some close to Hurry is alpines office is empty and he’s offshore !
Got all the shorties running scared. Rumor is john hurry is offshore with his 29 year old gf and alpine office is empty.
Tic tok tic tok
And chat sites are all a buzz !!!
Sec deadline is just a week away to see what fate belies crooks at alpine.
Charges have been filed. Discovery looming …..when alpines books are open all dirty secrets will be revealed!!!
I woulda skipped town also.
Kramers found someone to do their dirty work but the sec found a scapegoat for their sins too.
Dbmm is waiting patiently for the chips to fall where they may!!!
Yup!
The clueless Twitter clown HAM is pushing the Alpine thing like some kind of smoking gun!
Disappointment isn't just a river in Egypt... or something like that...
.
I'm sure that links can be provided to ACTUALLY PROVE any CDEL involvement with any "naked shorting" of DBMM....or ANY OTHER STOCK FOR THAT MATTER???
I'll wait....
Who cares? That's someone else's investment and decision.
Are we talking about the AP that has been pointed to, that is supposed to be ruled upon by March 29th?
Surely it is realized that this AP has experienced TEN STRAIGHT SEC extensions!!??
No one can be positive but anyone betting on if it will be ruled upon on the 29th would SURELY put their bet on yet ANOTHER EXTENSION being seen.
Yes especially? Why is it that dbmm stands out?
-Likely cause they are the only company out of over 2000 that werent delisted and stood pink current
- or that sec gave them a favorable ruling for delayed filings taking mitigating circumstances into account
- or vetted by Finra and OtCM after filing 211 having a Mm assigned.
Your right they do stand out in a crowd.
Shareholders apparently don't know that reinforcing current data by looking back to 2015 is a disingenuous act to conflate and call that information accurate when it isn’t even within the Statute of Limitations.
Well, I guess when nothing current can be posted....fall back on old faithful. LOL!
Anything to say about fair haired Miranda representing the DBMM's apparent enemy (Alpine)?
Or just more junk about this "100% revocation guarantee" crappola?
Lol i only remember kramer owing $DBMM and $DBMM revocation 100% guarantee.......
I don't know how to get that song out of my mind........
A bit of crying about the record of DBMM does NOT cut it.
I think it's fairly disingenuous to cry foul and ask present (and potential) share holders to IGNORE things that were done in the past (no matter HOW FAR BACK) since the SAME MANAGEMENT running things NOW ran things BACK THEN!
Shareholders DO NOT KNOW, unless they look at the past. The past is a good indicator of how management thinks and how they do things!
ESPECIALLY in the case of DBMM management.
Shareholders find it disingenuous to reach back 10 years to conflate and call that accurate when it isn’t even within the Statute of Limitations.
To reinforce accurate current data:
1.Company hasn’t issued a Convertible Debenture since 2015.
2. Since 2016 DBMM OS has increased 5% since 2016. Repeat and documented—5% increase in 7 years!
Shareholders know.
Conclusion there is no selling we own the float and MM's are playing ping pong with counterfeit shares NEXT!
Hi Linda!
Conclusion - there’s no buying….. Intelligent people want to see an actual company rather than a stock-selling racket.
Look - if someone has their shares available at .0079 and you buy them and then I immediately put my shares up for sale at .0077, the last trade price was .0079 and the ask would be lowered to .0077.
Not EVERY damn thing that doesn’t go your way is Market Maker fraud…..
Has learning occurred? I doubt it, but sheesh.
there is more than 1 case against Alpine so pardon me they are in such POO POO!
BYE BYE ALPINE!!!
Hi Linda!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
And so it goes……. One big ooops moment after another. Now it’s just comedy.
Eligible to uplist!
- No…..no they’re not….
Doesn’t matter if they’re not eligible
NSS covering will get this to $2!!!
- No…..they don’t exist….
Doesn’t matter anymore if they don’t exist
There’s no proof of legal representation!!!
- Here’s the proof….
The representation doesn’t matter
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Conclusion?
One should ACTUALLY READ the AP's before posting them up!
It might save some heartburn....and embarrassment.
Great! Good for her! I'm sure she will do a great job! NEXT!
OH! Now that I've PROVEN DBMM's Lawyer is representing Alpine....it DOESN'T MATTER??
Oh...I see!
LMFAOI
HERE is a post which you made, referencing AP 3-18979!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171490353
THIS AP has Miranda Fritz representing Alpine!!
Next?
What that OTHER post is about, with those OTHER lawyers??
Possibly, you can give some sort of reference number so I can research THAT - Properly.
That is NOT the AP you've been referring to!
I can of course provide a link to the AP you HAVE been referring to - if you'd LIKE.
POSSIBLY, a CLOSER READ of the Administrative Proceeding that you have been referencing should be done!
Here is a link to the administrative proceeding you have been referencing:
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/ap-3-18979.xml
That IS the AP you've been referencing, correct? Due to be ruled on by the SEC on MArch 29th? Correct?
Here is a link to a reply brief filed by Miranda Fritz, for her client - Alpine securities!
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-18979-event-33.pdf
Next?
Are we looking at the same stock? Look at the pathetic volume. No one is “scrambling”. NO ONE. Well, maybe the original pump and dump guy is scrambling some expensive eggs now that he can afford them with all the money he took from y’all, but no one else.
Anyone can buy as much as they want. Just hit the ask and hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of shares can be yours immediately!!!
LOL I'm not delicate! But thank you for your concern for my well being!
Hi Linda! Is Charlie Mayo going to call you too?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ywkmQAouEZyO4t6emHjc63ybhM0pjX6i/view
Hi Linda! When does Charlie Mayo call you to make a deal like they tried with GTI!?
TIC TOK TIC TOK!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ywkmQAouEZyO4t6emHjc63ybhM0pjX6i/view
THEY HAVE NO SHARES, THEY ARE SCRAMBLING!!!!
Any evidence of that actual application filing? They had an intent to do so. They had the eligibility to do so. The had the ability to do so. Hmmmm….. Sure would like to know these guys didn’t engage in an intentional attempt to defraud the shareholders. That would probably be bad. I bet their legal enemies would like to delve into that issue. Or do you think Linda is the ONLY legal team monitoring these boards (yeah right, as if she’s got nothing better to do).
Linda's attorney doesn't think so. She is representing Alpine. Isn't Alpine one of the bad guys that supposedly shorted DBMM??
But no matter, right? They've been "involved" with DBMM in the past, they've been known to be bad guys in the past....so they must've naked shorted the crap out of poor little DBMM.
When the shorters keep doubling down then call in their back up to protect their investment it’s just more and more reassurance daily.
Just like CDEL sending that scary letter back to publication on how they rig their trades, commit fraud and likened them to Burnie madoff.
A publication with 4500 followers and big untouchable CDEL sending them a retraction letter threatening legal action??? Must be scary times imagine even Bernie just ignored them !! Lol
🚨🚨BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨
— InvestorTurf (@InvestorTurf) March 13, 2023
We have received a communication from the legal team representing @citsecurities, requesting that we remove an article that we published. The article in question is based on publicly available information and allegations that we did not create ourselves. pic.twitter.com/jQRP0MYwIf
And the continued shorting to this day!! Exactly.
Sure am betting on it !!
Followers
|
1004
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
10
|
Posts (Total)
|
353657
|
Created
|
01/31/06
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators luvthemtrainz Jetmek_03052 johnydollar Stock_Barber 1vman |
SEC Case History:
NOTE: The FINRA Daily Short Report does NOT represent naked shorts! Boards where it is used to try to trick inexperienced investors signal a SERIOUS RED FLAG! Read FINRA's own explanation below
https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/short-interest
What Short Interest Is Not
In addition to short interest data, FINRA also publishes short sale volume data. The daily short sale volume data provides aggregated volume by security for all off-exchange short sale trades. This data excludes any trading activity that is not publicly disseminated and is not consolidated with exchange data.
Some market participants mistakenly conclude that the bimonthly short interest data is understated because the Short Sale Volume Daily File reflects volume that is much larger than the positions reported as short interest. However, short interest position data does not—and is not intended to—equate to the daily short sale volume data posted on FINRA’s website.
The short interest data is just a snapshot that reflects short positions held by brokerage firms at a specific moment in time on two discrete days each month. The Short Sale Volume Daily File reflects the aggregate volume of trades within certain parameters executed as short sales on individual trade dates. Therefore, while the two data sets are related in that short sale volume activity may ultimately result in a reportable short interest position, they are not the same.
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |