Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Great Report, Photonwav, Thanks ...eom
ronald.....
it is Diamond A Energy's pleasure!
First Ron in our update be sure to note your question comes in the: our OPINION paragraph.
Not being the operator we can only add in our opinion what we feel.
If anyone has followed our DD, i will recap.
when they finished the well....
there was 800 lbs in the pipe and 2400 pounds downhole.
Myers decided to fracture the Mississippi.. a secondary formation...not many have done this in the green ranch area..in fact they say the mississippi IF its gonna come will come..no need to frac...we did find a local driller however that at that time said they have been having success with this..WINN Exploration he even went so far to GUESS the z1 may have 500mmcf..educated guess.....
we reported when it happened.... new energy (the frac co) wanted to put at least 800 sacks in the well...
she went smoothly....
2500 lbs...2600lbs.....2700....."screen off"....plugged essentially.
new energy left the site and over the ensuing night the z1 became better and better....
the fracturing even sprung a couple of wells nearby to new life.
Then the well has.....well you read our updates.
still have chance??? yes anything can happen NO ONE knows EXACTLY what is actually happening down there...
our opinion.....
did the frac only bring in debris etc..that can eventually be cleaned? or do they have the gulf of mexico in there...
only time will tell.
plan b? hey if you want to wait..and wait.....
IF lets say they can't get the mississippi ......
IF mike DID NOT ruin the PRIMARY target the Conglomerate BEND...they again if ..if they can go there..plug the misssissippi and pull up the hole and go for the PRIMARY...
only time will tell.
photonwav
Photonway:
Thanks for the update.
Please comment:
- what is Plan "B"?
- what is the "Primary"?
Is there hope on this?
Regards
Ron Aboussafy
z1 well update..
send us an email at:
http://www.diamondaenergy.com/contact_us.htm
ONCE you send (just say "hi" in letter box so it will send)....
check your email, as the update will be on the AUTO response sent to you from our server that automatically responds to emails that notify the sender we have received your correspondence.
Diamond A Energy
Has there been any new news on how the testing is going on the Z1? Its been too quiet for the last few days.
Ron
and the coup de gace..(a decisive blow)
against non informance.....:)
http://www.diamondaenergy.com/drill_cam.htm
strategic....transparency...
http://www.diamondaenergy.com/verify.htm
the following is an excerpt of copyrighted material....
Considering Investing in a working interest in an oil and gas well us?
Consider this:
The preferred Investor:
......."These are an excellent resource with a plethora of information as a starting point for your due diligence. Talk over questions with your tax person and qualified oil and gas individuals."{......"the more informed you are as an individual the better for us".
If after your are comfortable in your understanding consider this:
Invest with the "worst case" scenario in mind. This would be that we drill the well(s) and we find nothing. This is called a "dry hole". Now no one drills for oil and gas and sets out to drill a dry hole. With today's advanced seismic technology, geologist review, producing wells adjacent to our project; etceteras, the chances for success are greatly improved in the proximity of 70% or greater.
However, the United States tax code is written to spur domestic oil and gas exploration. In this light if we drill a dry hole, the individual is able to write off, against ordinary income, 100% of their investment in that tax year the well is drilled. Confirm this with your tax person.
If you are comfortable with that scenario in mind, then weigh the potential for profits and the tremendous tax benefits on a successful well(s), and know why we ask:.....
photonwav
thank you wallstreet1991...
and it is articles and web sites like you posted and experience..that teach and have taught Diamond A Energy how to do it right.
your post is a great "template" to initiate one's due diligence.....there is NO substitute!
the more one knows the better...period
one note upon the power of owning a working interest in oil and gas wells is...
Attention:
Tax Advantages of Domestic Oil and Gas Investments
It is essential for the investor to calculate their tax position before considering an oil or gas investment. Probably the most significant cost feature in oil and gas investing is the effect of federal income tax legislation. It is imperative that an investor understands the tax advantages in order to fully appreciate the benefits of investing in oil and gas. Briefly stated, the investor uses a portion of their tax dollars for investing instead of sending that money to the government for yearly income tax payment. This tax break is given as an incentive to encourage new drilling ventures within the United States.
The following is an example: If an Individual invests an amount of money in an oil or gas drilling venture, they are allowed to write off all of the intangible drilling costs the first year. This usually amounts to 50% to 75% of the total investment. The remaining percentage is not written off the first year must be taken over a five to seven year period. Eventually the entire investment will and can be written off,
Furthermore, the tax savings are achieved with or without any loss of capital. In addition to tax money saved up front, the depletion allowance for oil and gas states that $0.15 on every gross dollar returned to the investor is non-taxable money starting the second year through the entire life of the wells. Thus, Investing in Oil and Gas not only creates a tax shelter, but also generates a tax-sheltered income.
Tax Benefits
Congressional Incentives
In 1986 Congress provided tax incentives to stimulate domestic production financed by private investment. These tax benefits enhance the economics of an oil and gas investment already feasible due to the depression of the oil and gas industry. With the passage of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, oil and gas are one of the most tax-advantaged investments. This act specifically exempts oil and gas working interests from being classified as "Passive Income" (see Section 469(c)(3) of the Tax Code).
Federal Income Tax The basic tax considerations involved in an oil and gas-drilling program are as follows:
· Dry Hole: 100% of all dollars invested are written off as a loss against your ordinary income in the first year.
· Producing Well: Generally your investment INCLUDES what are known as Intangible Drilling Costs (IDC's) and (IDC's) may be written off your ordinary income in the first year. IDC's include labor-intensive costs such as the drilling contactor and professional services and are reported to the investor at the end of the year.
· Generally your investment also includes Tangible Drilling Costs (TDC's) which are depreciated over a seven-year period using the Accelerated Cost Recovery System (ACRS). TDC's include pipe, storage tanks, and wellhead equipment, capitalized and depreciated.
· Percentage Depletion Allowance: Currently 15%, making fifteen cents of every gross income dollar non-taxable, therefore producing tax sheltered income. Most drilling operations of this nature qualify for these tax benefits, against Ordinary Income.
Essentially, a person in a high tax bracket can save as much as $13,000 to $15,000 cash off their annual tax payment on an investment of $50,000, or roughly $6,500 to $9,000 on an investment of $25,000, etc. The tax savings can be substantial and unlike many investments, an oil and gas joint venture does not require active participation in order to receive tax benefits.
· Further more These tax benefits are not available to the large oil companies.
WARNING:
Oil & Gas, Tax and Securities laws change Frequently, as do the World conditions and other current World events that can have a direct impact on the Oil&Gas Industry, You are strongly advised to consult legal counsel or the appropriate professional, this site is not intended to provide Legal, Investment, or Tax advice in anyway so please contact your Legal Counsel or CPA Pertaining to your direct situation.
photonwav
I came across this site talking about DD on oil and gas wells that I thought would be interesting to the readers here.
from http://www.leasemarketing.com/defduediligence.htm
Due Diligence
The following is a list of questions that we try to answer before making an offer to purchase income producing oil and gas properties (working interests and royalties). If a prospective buyer doesn't understand these questions and how to get answers (or employ someone who does), then they should not be making offers to purchase. Buying income properties is a difficult business and it is possible to lose all of your investment, and sometimes even more than your original investment through liabilities that you assume.
Obtain and analyze:
Production history of the lease
Production histories of nearby similar wells
Copies of recent JIB's (joint interest billings) and revenue cheque stubs
Talk to:
Operator of the well and ask about condition of well, future plans, and any additional potential
Determine if there are any gas balancing issues, environmental issues, workovers planned,...
Ask the operator if he maintains insurance that would protect you against various forms of liability
For working interests obtain copies of:
Operating agreement
Gas balancing agreement (if any)
Gas balancing statement (if any)
Gas marketing contracts (if any) - will a favorable or unfavorable gas purchase contract expire soon?
Any other contracts that pertain to the interest
Leases that you are buying
Form of the proposed assignment
Other questions:
Do you have a disbursement responsibility?
Are there any title questions?
Will lease rights be reduced for failure to drill more wells?
What lease rights are you buying?
What is your potential expense for plugging and abandonment?
Questions pertaining to any upside potential:
Do well logs indicate behind the pipe recompletion potential?
Might additional wells be drilled on the lease?
Is the producing formation a candidate for secondary recovery?
The answers to each of these questions may lead to more questions. Each property is its own small business with its own set of income and expenses. You should be able to construct a model representing the future potential net income of the property based on your understanding of the answers you obtained and various commodity pricing scenarios. Once it ceases to be profitable for the working interest parties to operate the well, the well will probably be plugged and all income will cease - including that from the royalties.
Also you should be aware of county property taxes, severance taxes, state and Federal income taxes. How will they reduce your cash flow? What is the most appropriate form of legal entity in which to hold title? What is it going to cost you to properly account for all this?
O. G. Bunting
Lease Marketing, Inc.
Current Energy Prices
Light Sweet Crude Oil Oct (NYMEX) 29.33 +0.70 162 172169 1:05PM
SCQ2 Brent Crude Oil Aug (NYMEX) 26.26
Henry Hub Natural Gas Oct (NYMEX) 3.600 +0.057 20 53797 1:05PM
at 90 years old...
art linkletter was on larry king live Sunday night (last night)...
and larry had a hard time steering mr. linkletter away form his enthusiasm.....for.....
his LOVE for oil and gas well drilling!
one of his WI wells just hit a big gas field in south texas!
he was excited that at 90 years old..for 10 ,12, 15 years he'll have that income..rolling in..even though he doesn't need it. you could see his "addiction" for drilling for natural gas and oil!
it was like a commercial for owning a working interest!
hmmmmm.
photonwav
Congratulations Guys!!!
Hope you celebrated!!!
Pam
Photonwave, Any New Info from Green Ranch, TX
What's the word on our Apple Dumpling Gang?
Energy Outlook
Compliments DOE
International Energy Outlook 2002
Highlights
World energy consumption is projected to increase by 60 percent from 1999 to 2020. Much of the growth in worldwide energy use is expected in the
developing world in the IEO2002 reference case forecast.
In the reference case projections for the International Energy Outlook 2002 (IEO2002), world energy consumption is projected to increase by 60 percent over a 21-year forecast horizon, from 1999 to 2020. Worldwide energy use grows from 382 quadrillion British thermal units (Btu) in 1999 to 612 quadrillion Btu in 2020 (Figure 2). Energy markets were influenced by a host of developments in 2001, including high world oil prices that persisted from 2000 into the first part of 2001 and then weakened substantially in the third quarter of the year; a global economic slowdown led by a mild recession in the United States; and the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001.
Despite the events of the past year, much of the growth in worldwide energy use is still expected in the developing world, as it has been in past editions of this outlook (Figure 3). In particular, energy demand in developing Asia and Central and South America is projected to more than double between 1999 and 2020. Both of these regions are expected to sustain energy demand growth of about 4 percent annually throughout the forecast, accounting for about half of the total projected increment in world energy consumption and 83 percent of the increment for the developing world alone.
High world oil prices carried into 2001 from the previous year, and for the first half of the year they remained within—and, during day trading, occasionally spiked above—the $22 to $28 per barrel price band that the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) has defined as its preferred range. Although prices spiked initially after the September 11 terrorist attacks launched on the United States, oil demand weakened substantially in the weeks and months that followed the attacks, and OPEC found it difficult to hold prices much above the $22 per barrel mark. Even after three production quota cuts amounting to 3.5 million barrels per day were made in 2001, prices did not strengthen. At the end of 2001, OPEC entered into a protracted negotiation with key non-OPEC producers aimed at reducing oil exports enough to shore up the world market price. OPEC members (excluding Iraq) agreed to cut 1.5 million barrels of production, and non-OPEC producers Angola, Norway, Mexico, Oman, and Russia agreed to take a combined 462,500 barrels per day out of the export market beginning in January 2002.
The U.S. refiner acquisition cost of imported crude oil fell from $27.72 per barrel in 2000 to an estimated $22.05 per barrel in 2001 (nominal dollars). The IEO2002 reference case expects world oil prices to moderate in 2002 and return to the price trajectory anticipated in last year’s outlook for the mid-term. World oil prices are expected to reach $25 per barrel in 2000 dollars ($42 per barrel in nominal dollars) at the end of the projection period. This year’s projection for world oil prices is slightly higher than last year’s projection (Figure 4), reflecting the successes OPEC had in managing oil production cutbacks to raise oil prices in 2000, along with a more optimistic mid-term outlook for demand in the world’s developing countries.
Outlook for World Energy Demand
Much of the industrialized world experienced economic slowdown in 2001, led by what is estimated to have been a recession in the United States since March 2001. The lowered economic activity in the industrialized world will have short-term impacts on the rest of the world as demand for products and services from developing countries slows in response. Lowered demand for computer equipment has already nudged high-tech exporters South Korea and Taiwan into recession. The mid-term forecast assumes that the recession will not be protracted in the United States, and that gross domestic product (GDP) growth and energy demand growth will rebound and will largely resume the trend projected in last year’s outlook. The IEO2002 reference case expects that energy consumption in the industrialized world will grow by 1.3 percent per year between 1999 and 2020, slightly higher than the 1.2 percent per year projected in last year’s report.
One of the few bright spots among the world’s regional economies in 2001 was the former Soviet Union (FSU), where GDP registered a second year of positive growth for every nation in the region. High oil prices and a devalued ruble helped Russia—the region’s largest economy—post strong economic gains by boosting performance in the country’s industrial sector. As the ruble regained value in 2001, the manufacturing sector slowed somewhat (as imported goods once again could compete with domestic goods), but high world oil prices in the first three quarters of the year helped Russia return to a GDP growth rate of 5.3 percent.
Ukraine, the second largest economy in the FSU, also reported positive economic growth in 2001—only its second year of positive GDP since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1989. Ukraine is a net importer of oil, and the high world oil prices did not benefit its economy. Instead, fiscal reform and strong growth in industrial output, construction activity, agriculture, and exports, along with fast-paced growth in domestic consumption and investment, helped to fuel Ukraine’s economic growth. The improving economic outlook for Russia and the rest of the FSU suggests a more sustained period of growth for the region and is expected to result in energy demand growth for the region of 1.8 percent per year between 1999 and 2020, reaching 57 quadrillion Btu at the end of the forecast (Figure 5).
Worldwide, oil consumption rose by less than 100,000 barrels per day in 2001, divided evenly among the industrialized (mainly Western Europe) and developing (mainly Central and South America) nations. Demand is expected to begin to recover in 2002 as the world economies begin to recover from the slowdown in 2001, and global oil demand is projected to expand by about 600,000 barrels per day in 2002. The increases in worldwide oil use projected in the reference case would require an increment of almost 44 million barrels per day over current productive capacity. OPEC producers are expected to be the major beneficiaries of increased production requirements, but non-OPEC supply is expected to remain competitive, with major increments of supply coming from offshore resources, especially in the Caspian Basin, Latin America, and deepwater West Africa. Deepwater exploration and development initiatives are generally expected to be sustained worldwide, with the offshore Atlantic Basin emerging as a major future source of oil production in both Latin America and Africa.
World Energy Consumption by Energy Source
Throughout the past several decades, oil has been the world’s dominant source of primary energy consumption, and it is expected to remain in that position with a 40-percent share of total energy consumption over the 1999-2020 period (Figure 6). The oil share of the world energy pie does not increase in the forecast because countries in many parts of the world are expected to switch from oil to natural gas and other fuels, particularly for electricity generation. Its share of total energy consumption is expected to remain constant because of its predominance in the transportation sector, where energy use is projected to grow robustly over the next two decades. World oil consumption is projected to increase by 2.2 percent annually over the 21-year projection period, from 75 million barrels per day in 1999 to 119 million barrels per day in 2020.
Although the nations of the industrialized world continue to consume more of the world’s petroleum products than do those of the developing world, the gap is projected to narrow considerably over the forecast period. In 1999, developing nations consumed 58 percent of the amount of oil consumed in the industrialized world, but by 2020 they are expected to consume almost 90 percent as much oil as the industrialized world. The increase in oil use in the industrialized world is expected to occur predominantly in the transportation sector, where there are presently few economically competitive alternatives to oil. In the developing world, oil demand is projected to grow in all end-use sectors. As the energy infrastructures of emerging economies improve, people are turning from traditional fuels like wood burning for heating and cooking to electricity, and additional petrochemical feedstocks are being used for industry.
The fastest growing source of energy consumption in the IEO2002 reference case is projected to be natural gas. Over the 1999-2020 forecast period, gas use is projected to nearly double in the reference case, reaching 162 trillion cubic feet in 2020. Natural gas use surpassed coal use (on a Btu basis) for the first time in 1999, and by 2020 it is expected to exceed coal use by 38 percent (Figure 7). The natural gas share of total energy consumption is projected to increase from 23 percent in 1999 to 28 percent in 2020, and natural gas is expected to account for the largest increment in electricity generation (increasing by 33 quadrillion Btu and accounting for 43 percent of the total increment in energy use for electricity generation). Much of the projected growth in natural gas consumption throughout the world is in response to rising demand for natural gas to fuel efficient new gas turbine power plants. Gas use is increasing for a number of additional reasons, including price, environmental concerns, fuel diversification and/or energy security issues, market deregulation (for both gas and electricity), and overall economic growth.
In the industrialized world, natural gas is expected to make a greater contribution to incremental energy consumption among the major fuels, increasingly becoming the choice for new power generation because of its environmental and economic advantages. In the developing countries, increments in gas use are expected to supply both power generation and industrial uses. The IEO2002 reference case projects particularly robust growth in natural gas use in the developing world, averaging 5.3 percent per year between 1999 and 2020, reflecting the growing popularity of the fuel, as well as the expectation that the relatively immature gas markets of emerging countries will develop quickly over the coming years.
World coal use has been in a period of generally slow growth since the 1980s, and the trend is expected to continue through the projection period. The projected slow growth in coal consumption, averaging 1.7 percent per year through 2020, suggests that coal will account for a shrinking share of world energy consumption. In 1999, coal provided 22 percent of world primary energy consumption, down from 27 percent in 1985. In the IEO2002 reference case, the coal share of total energy consumption is projected to fall to 20 percent by 2020. The expected decline in coal’s share of energy use would be even greater were it not for large increases in energy use projected for developing Asia, where coal continues to dominate many fuel markets, especially in China and India. As very large countries in terms of both population and land mass, China and India are projected to account for 83 percent of the total expected increase in coal use worldwide (on a Btu basis).
Coal consumption is heavily concentrated in the electricity generation sector. Almost 65 percent of the world’s coal use is for electricity generation, and power generation accounts for virtually all the projected growth in coal consumption worldwide. One exception is China, where coal continues to be the main fuel in a rapidly growing industrial sector, reflecting the country’s abundant coal reserves and limited access to other sources of energy. Consumption of coking coal is projected to decline slightly in most regions of the world as a result of technological advances in steelmaking, increasing output from electric arc furnaces, and continuing replacement of steel by other materials in end-use applications.
Although past editions of this report have projected declines in nuclear electricity consumption, higher capacity utilization and fewer expected retirements of existing plants have resulted in a revision to the expectations for a decline in consumption. Extensions of operating licenses (or the equivalent) for nuclear power plants are expected to be requested and granted among the countries of the industrialized world. With more of the existing nuclear power plants expected to remain in operation, the projected decline in nuclear generation is slowed. In the IEO2002 reference case, world nuclear capacity is projected to rise from 350 gigawatts in 2000 to 363 gigawatts in 2010 before falling to 359 gigawatts in 2020.
The highest growth in nuclear generation is projected for the developing world, where consumption of electricity from nuclear power is projected to increase by 4.7 percent per year between 1999 and 2020. In particular, developing Asia is expected to see the greatest expansion in new nuclear generating capacity. The nations of developing Asia account for half the reactors currently under construction worldwide, including eight in China, four in South Korea, two in India, and two in Taiwan.
Renewable energy use is expected to increase by 53 percent between 1999 and 2020, but its current 9-percent share of total energy consumption is projected to drop slightly to 8 percent by 2020. Over the forecast horizon, growth in renewable energy resources is expected to continue to be constrained by relatively moderate fossil fuel prices. Renewable energy consumption is expected to be driven by new, large-scale hydroelectric projects, particularly in China, India, Malaysia, and other developing Asian countries. In 2001, construction on mega-hydro projects like China’s 18,200-megawatt Three Gorges Dam and Malaysia’s 2,400-megawatt Bakun continued amidst criticism of their environmental impacts and concerns about the welfare of the people being relocated to accommodate the projects.
The world’s use of electricity is projected to increase by two-thirds over the forecast horizon, from 13 trillion kilowatthours in 1999 to 22 trillion kilowatthours in 2020. The strongest growth rates in electricity consumption are projected for developing Asia, where electricity consumption is expected to grow by 4.5 percent per year as robust economic growth increases the demand for electricity to run newly purchased air conditioners, refrigerators, stoves, space heaters, and water heaters. In the industrialized world, electricity consumption is expected to grow at a more modest pace. Slower population and economic growth, along with the market saturation of certain electronic appliances (such as air conditioners) and efficiency gains from electrical appliances help to explain the expected slower growth of electricity use in the industrialized nations, although growing computer usage and the introduction of new electronic devices could moderate that trend somewhat in the future.
There have been two important developments in the electricity sector in recent years that may affect the way the industry works in the future. The first is the increasing role of foreign direct investment in the developing regions of the world. Greater access to foreign investment in the electricity sector has allowed developing nations to construct the infrastructure needed for substantial increases in access to electricity, a particular problem for many developing nations. A second important component of the electric industry’s evolution over the past several years is electricity reform. Many developing countries have implemented reforms to the rules governing electricity generation and distribution in an effort to secure the foreign direct investment they need to modernize and improve the electricity infrastructure. In industrialized countries, many nations have undertaken electricity reforms to introduce greater competition in domestic markets in an effort to reduce the costs of electricity to consumers.
Outlook for Transportation Energy Use
The past year saw a reversal of the high prices and tight markets that characterized the energy industry in 2000. Transportation demand growth in 2001 is likely to be the lowest in several years, with slowing economic growth moderating growth in world oil demand even before the September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States. Despite the recent pressure on transportation fuels from oil prices that hit 10-year highs in 2000, transportation energy use is expected to continue robust growth over the next two decades, especially in the developing world, where relatively immature transportation infrastructures are expected to grow rapidly as national and regional economies expand. In the IEO2002 reference case, energy use for transportation is projected to increase by 3.8 percent per year in the developing world, compared with average annual increases of 1.7 percent for the industrialized countries, where transportation systems are largely established and motorization levels (per capita vehicle ownership) are, in many nations, expected to reach saturation levels over the 21-year forecast horizon.
In urban centers of the developing world, car ownership is often seen as one of the first symbols of emerging prosperity. Per capita motorization in much of the developing world is projected to more than double between 1999 and 2020, although population growth is expected to keep motorization levels low relative to those in the industrialized world. For example, the U.S. per capita motorization level in 2020 is projected at 797 vehicles per thousand persons, but in China—where motorization is expected to grow fivefold over the forecast horizon—the projected motorization level in 2020 is only 52 vehicles per thousand persons (Figure 8).
Carbon Dioxide Emissions
Because estimates indicate that approximately 80 percent of all human-caused carbon dioxide emissions currently come from fossil fuel combustion, world energy use has emerged at the center of the climate change debate. In the IEO2002 reference case, world carbon dioxide emissions are projected to rise from 6.1 billion metric tons carbon equivalent in 1999 to 7.9 billion metric tons per year in 2010 and to 9.9 billion metric tons in 2020 (Figure 9). Much of the projected increase in carbon dioxide emissions is expected to occur in the developing world, where emerging economies are expected to produce the largest increases in energy consumption. Developing countries alone account for 77 percent of the projected increment in carbon dioxide emissions between 1990 and 2010 and 72 percent between 1990 and 2020. Continued heavy reliance on coal and other fossil fuels, as projected for the developing countries, would ensure that even if the industrialized world undertook efforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, worldwide carbon dioxide emissions would still grow substantially over the forecast horizon.
Energy Intensity
The IEO2002 projections, like all forecasts, are accompanied by a measure of uncertainty. One way to quantify the uncertainty is to consider the relationship between energy consumption and growth in gross domestic product (that is, energy intensity) over time. In the industrialized countries, history shows the link between energy consumption and economic growth to be a relatively weak one, with growth in energy demand lagging behind economic growth. In the developing countries, the two have been more closely correlated, with energy demand growing in parallel with economic expansion.
In the IEO2002 forecast, energy intensity in the industrialized countries is expected to improve (decrease) by 1.3 percent per year between 1999 and 2020, about the same rate of improvement observed in the region between 1970 and 1999. Energy intensity is also projected to improve in the developing countries—by 1.2 percent per year—as their economies begin to behave more like those of the industrialized countries as a result of improving standards of living that accompany the projected economic expansion (Figure 10). For more than three decades, the EE/FSU has maintained a much higher level of energy intensity than either the industrialized or developing countries. Over the forecast
horizon, energy intensity is expected to improve in the EE/FSU region in concert with expected recovery from the economic and social declines of the early 1990s; however, it is still expected to be twice as high as in the developing world and five times as high as in the industrialized world.
Carbon Intensity
Carbon intensity—the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per dollar of GDP—is also projected to improve throughout the world over the next two decades (Figure 11). The most rapid improvements are, for the most part, projected for the transitional economies of the EE/FSU. In the FSU, economic recovery from the upheaval of the 1990s is expected to continue throughout the forecast. The FSU nations are also expected to replace old and inefficient capital stock and increasingly use less carbon-intensive natural gas for electricity generation and other end uses in place of more carbon-intensive oil and coal.
In developing Asia, China and India are also expected to see fairly rapid improvements in carbon intensity over the projection period, primarily as a result of rapid economic growth rather than a switch to less carbon-intensive fuels. Both China and India are expected to continue their heavy dependence on fossil fuels, especially coal, in the IEO2002 reference case forecast, but their combined annual GDP growth is projected to average 6.6 percent, compared with an expected 4.4-percent annual rate of increase in fossil fuel use from 1999 to 2020.
Contact Us
Contact Authors
Page last modified on 07/29/2002 13:43:21
URL: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/index.html
!!!!DIAMOND A ENERGY CORPORATION!!!!
DIAMOND A ENERGY CORPORATION
Receives Sate of Texas Incorporation Seal.
Incorporated in the State of Texas 8/20/2002.....!
Happy Birthday!
a GeM is born.
photonwav
US Planes Bomb Iraqi Site
Compliments of the Guardian
Friday August 23, 2002 6:20 PM
ANKARA, Turkey (AP) - U.S. warplanes bombed an air defense site in northern Iraq on Friday after being targeted by an Iraqi missile guidance radar system, the U.S. military said.
The planes were on a routine patrol when Iraqi radar locked on the warplanes flying near the northern Iraqi Kurdish city of Irbil, the Stuttgart, Germany-based U.S. European Command said in a statement.
``Coalition aircraft responded to the Iraqi attacks by firing on the radar site,' the statement said. ``All coalition aircraft departed the area safely.'
The incident came at a time when the United States is considering an attack on Iraq aimed at overthrowing its leader, Saddam Hussein.
The planes are based at Incirlik air base in southern Turkey.
U.S. and British warplanes have been monitoring ``no fly' zones over southern and northern Iraq since shortly after the 1991 Gulf War to protect the Kurdish minority and Shiite Muslims.
Iraq considers the patrols a violation of its sovereignty and frequently shoots at them.
Natural Gas Rally +.24
NEW YORK: Gas rally 23/08/2002 07:41:25
Natural gas futures for September delivery on the NYMEX jumped 7.4% higher yesterday, gaining $0.241 to $3.515 per MMBtu, driven higher by a bullish natural gas storage report and heavy buying by trade, funds and locals, reports ENERFAX.
The October contract rose $0.252 to $3.591 per MMBtu. The market has risen almost $0.90 since August 7th. The EIA reported only 37 Bcf injected into storage, somewhat less than the 40 - 50 Bcf expected.
There is now 2.657 Tcf in storage compared to 2.426 Tcf a year ago, and a 5-year average of 2.35 Tcf. The rally was supported by technical buying and heavy short covering by funds that have shown extreme net short positions in the late summer. Look for profit-taking today, and a pullback in the near-term.
On the upside, short-term resistance is seen at $3.60. The Edison Energy Institute said more than 80,000 gigawatts of power was generated last week across the nation, the 8th consecutive week above that level, an indication of steady demand. Injections are still on pace to reach 3.25 Tcf by this winter.
Storage injections for last week were 5.3 Bcf per day vs. 9.1 Bcf per day a year ago, and a 5-year average of 12.2 Bcf per day. Cooling degree days were 91 versus 75 last year, 77 normally and a 5-year average of 78.
Yesterday, about 125,000 contracts traded, with a third being spreads. On Wednesday, volume was 95,729 contracts.
Natural gas for next day delivery across the US and Canada was generally $0.10 - $0.15 higher.
Natural gas for next day delivery at the Henry hub gained $0.14 to $3.36 per MMBtu.
energy24
News Feed provided by Energy24
Energy is looking good*...
*(for companies that actually have the commodity).
Bullish Storage, Technicals Run Their Course, But Sell-Off Expected
from NGI's Daily Gas Price Index August 23, 2002
For the third Thursday in a row, the natural gas futures market moved dramatically higher following a lower-than-expected storage injection figure. At 10:30 a.m. EDT, the Energy Information Administration reported that 37 Bcf was added to underground storage facilities last week, and by 10:40 a.m. the market was 15 cents higher for the session. From that point forward, natural gas futures battled slowly higher as follow-through buying slightly outmatched profit-taking. At $3.515, September finished up 24.1 cents on the day and just a few ticks below its new, eight-week high at $3.53. ( more )
Four fours POP in.....
Futures Market Prices
NYMEX Natural Gas
August 22nd Settlement Prices
Sep 2002 3.515 +.241
Oct 3.591 +.252
Nov 3.828 +.227
Dec 4.051 +.207
Jan 2003 4.157 +.183
Feb 4.107 +.168
Mar 4.027 +.153
Apr 3.887 +.133
May 3.887 +.130
Jun 3.890 +.123
Jul 3.900 +.113
Aug 3.912 +.113
Oil & Gas Prices
NYMEX................$28.84....-.40
IPE.......................$27.02....-.39
Dated Brent.........$27.37....-.34
West texas Inter..$30.35....-.04
Natural Gas
NYMEX Henry Hub.......$3.53....+.24
Henry Hub.....................$3.32....+.10
Chicago City Gate........$3.20....+.10
.
Oil Prices Spike
Courtesy of Dallas Morning News
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crude Oil Prices Spike As Traders' Watch for United States, Iraq Clash
Aug 22, 2002 (The Dallas Morning News - Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News via
COMTEX) -- Increased talk of a conflict between the United States and Iraq has
caused oil traders to worry about potential supply disruptions from the Middle
East, sending crude prices up sharply this week.
Traders have added a "war premium" of up to $8 per barrel amid the recent war
discussions by the Bush administration, said John Kilduff, energy analyst and
senior vice president at Fimat USA Inc.
"Prior to the most recent attention on this, we were forecasting an attack as
early as February," Mr. Kilduff said. "Given the latest round of statements,
there had been talk of hostilities as early as October.
"If the administration could calm down the news cycle on this, I would expect
prices to retreat by $2 or $3."
Prices have risen more than 10 percent since the beginning of the month. U.S.
crude oil futures for October delivery closed at $29.24 in regular trading
Wednesday, up 47 cents. On Tuesday, oil for September delivery reached an
18-month high of $30.32 per barrel.
The prices remained high Wednesday despite a report from the U.S. Energy
Information Administration that U.S. oil supplies increased by 2.8 million
barrels last week, after a decrease of 7.2 million barrels the week before.
However, war concerns aren't the only factor pushing prices up, said Larry
Goldstein, president of the Petroleum Industry Research Foundation.
The war talk accounts for an increase of about $2 per barrel, he said. Cutbacks
by the United Nations in Iraq's oil-for-food program account for about $1 per
barrel. And because oil demand fell significantly after Sept. 11, demand this
fall will be higher compared with the end of last year.
"The war premium, while correct, is premature," Mr. Goldstein said. "I think war
is inevitable -- I don't think it's imminent."
Continued concerns about war could keep prices up and stunt an already slow
economic recovery, said Dr. Bill Gilmer, senior economist at the Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas' Houston branch.
"It's not a plus for the U.S. economy or for the global economy to see prices go
up," he said. "If those prices persist, it would be a negative, no question."
The United States fell into a recession after the 1973 Arab oil embargo, the
1980 Iran-Iraq war and the 1990-91 Gulf War.
A conflict with Iraq probably would boost prices further in the short-term, and
perhaps longer if Iraq disrupted significant oil supplies from the Middle East,
which has two-thirds of the world's oil reserves.
In the months after Iraq invaded Kuwait in August 1990, oil prices doubled from
the high teens to more than $40 per barrel.
But the United States is better prepared now than it was 12 years ago, Mr.
Goldstein said. Now, other producers -- including Algeria, Nigeria and Venezuela
-- could make up for lost volume from Iraq, and the U.S. government seems
prepared to tap into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve faster than it did during
the Gulf War, he said.
Last November, Mr. Bush announced that the government would increase the
reserve, which is held in salt domes along the Texas and Louisiana coasts, to
700 million barrels from 550 million.
Still, if oil futures continue their upward trend, the resulting higher prices
at the gas pumps could hurt the Bush administration's efforts to sell its war
plans to the American people, analysts said.
So far, gas prices in Dallas have barely nudged this summer, remaining around
$1.34 or $1.35 a gallon for regular unleaded -- the same level as a year ago.
By Sudeep Reddy
To see more of The Dallas Morning News, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go
to http://www.dallasnews.com.
Natural Gas prices
Gas, Natural NYMEX
Contract*: Sep02 Future
Trade Date: 22-Aug-2002
Open: 3.298 Bid: 3.285
High: 3.298 Ask: 3.290 Low: 3.269 % Change: 0.3360
Last: 3.285 Change: 0.011
Settle: 0 Volatility (1-mo): 59.4
Expiration: 28-Aug-2002 Volatility (3-mo): 49.3
Data snapshot taken at 18:18:51 ET from a delayed source
Market Closed
Quotes provided by Bridge Information Systems, Inc.
Here is the latest news for Habanero Resources. I have been receiving many
enquiries as to why I resigned from FGD. I chose to resign because i had no
control on the day to day running of the company and I wanted to focus the
majority of my time on HAO. I spend most of my time on HAO right now and
thought it made more sense to focus exclusively on HAO of which i have
direct input in the day to day operations. There is no plan for a roll back
on HAO as i have had some people ask me that. HAO has a little over 11
million out and has no need to consider this action. Please call me if you
have any questions about the well or my decisions regarding FGD.
Thank You
BASSMANINCT..YOURPLACE....
Any email to Diamond A Energy will come to my desk.
the "contact us" page is working.....
or
http://www.admin@diamondaenergy.com
as a bonus you will get an immediate auto response from our server on the z1 updates and videos so check your email right after you send me your inquiry.
we will answer all your questions gladly.
photonwav
MICRON ENVIRO SYSTEMS INC.
7514 Shadyvilla Drive Suite 100
Houston, Texas
77055
August 21, 2002 OTCBB- MSEV
Texas Update
The operator has informed Micron Enviro Systems ("MSEV") that the testing
process on the Z1 Well is slightly behind schedule. During the initial
testing stage, the pump was running at full capacity and some frac sand
filled the pump. This caused a two-day delay to clean out the tubing and
then to run it back down the well. Over the past three days the pumping
unit ran at approximately half of its capability to avoid the same possible
delays. The operator feels that we should continue to flow the well at
these reduced levels for the next 4-7 days and then slowly increase the
volume. Over the past three days the level of oil within the fluids being
pumped out of the well has increased each successive day. Once the level of
oil and condensate has stabilized and the well has flowed at its maximum
rate we will be able to provide flow rates for the well. Once official
numbers are achieved they will be immediately released.
If you have any questions please call MSEV. If you would like to be added
to MSEV's company updates email list, please send an email to
info@micronenviro.com and ask to be added.
Bernie McDougall, President of MSEV states, "We at MSEV understand and
appreciate our loyal shareholders anger and frustration over the delays this
well has experienced. We feel the same anger and frustration at the
company. Please understand that MSEV is only a stakeholder in this well and
is not the operator. Consequently the private interests control all the
drilling and completion processes. This being the case, the private
interests' timelines are not always the same as the public company's
expected timelines. What everyone needs to realize is that the company is
attempting to complete a commercial well and field with its partners. If
the partner's course of action is such that it causes delays, these actions
are outside of MSEV's control. The way the company will gain the credibility
with the shareholders is to successfully complete commercially viable wells
and that is what we are striving for."
This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks
and uncertainties. The statements in this Release are forward-looking
statements that are made pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results, events and
performance could vary materially from those contemplated by these
forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks
and uncertainties, which may cause the Company's actual results in future
periods to differ materially from results expressed or implied by
forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among
other things, volatility of oil and gas prices, product demand, market
competition, and imprecision of reserve estimates. You should independently
investigate and fully understand all risks before making investment
decisions.
Contact Information:
Bernie McDougall
Micron Enviro Systems Inc.
info@micronenviro.com
TEL: 604-719-3705
www.micronenviro.com
This is not a solicitation to buy or sell securities. Any decision to buy
or sell securities should be made with the advice of a financial
professional. This is just a service for interested parties.
If you feel this was sent in error or would like to be removed from this
service, please respond to this email with delete in the subject line.
Oil Tops $30 per bbl
Compliments of the Houston Chronicle
Latest News
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fear of Clash with Iraq Propels Crude Oil Prices above $30 per Barrel
Aug 21, 2002 (Houston Chronicle - Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News via
COMTEX) -- Continuing fear of short supplies if the United States invades Iraq
drove oil prices above $30 per barrel Tuesday, but they are not expected to stay
there long.
The talk of war by the Bush administration has pushed prices to the highest
levels since February 2001, overcoming concerns that a slowing economy would
mean reduced demand for the remainder of the year.
Estimates from analysts of the so-called "war premium" on the benchmark crude
oil futures contract range from $2 and $6 per barrel.
The September contract expired Tuesday, which compounded the upward pressure on
prices. Prices rallied as the day went on as traders who bet on falling prices
had to buy contracts to close out their positions.
But the law of supply and demand is likely to intrude today. Prices are expected
to open much lower today because of high inventory numbers that came out after
the market closed.
The October contract will be the near-month contract trading when the session
opens today. It never got close to $30 a barrel on Tuesday, closing at $28.77
per barrel, off 3 cents per barrel.
"I would expect it to open much lower than where September closed out," said
Kyle Cooper, oil analyst with Salomon Smith Barney in Houston.
Light, sweet crude oil for delivery in September closed Tuesday on the New York
Mercantile Exchange at $30.11, up 27 cents per barrel, the highest the
near-month contract has closed since Feb. 13, 2001.
Traders have been pushing up oil prices since last week when reports came out
that the Navy was chartering commercial ships to move military hardware to the
Persian Gulf from the United States and Europe.
Fear over a possible clash with Iraq was a large factor in driving up prices,
said Christopher Theal, energy analyst with CIBC World Markets, who believes oil
is trading at $4 to $6 above where it would be on fundamentals.
In London, the October Brent crude-oil futures contract fell 16 cents to $27.10
a barrel on the International Petroleum Exchange.
The rally will almost certainly end today because of much higher-than-expected
inventory numbers released by the American Petroleum Institute after the markets
closed Tuesday.
Many traders and analysts had expected to see a substantial decline in
inventories, but instead, the weekly report on oil stockpiles showed crude oil
inventories rose by 6.64 million barrels.
Some analysts questioned the API numbers last week because they did not jibe
with the totals for imports, production and crude runs at refineries.
Some felt the API was trying to rectify its overcalculation of last week's
drawdown with the large inventory gain reported Tuesday.
"They gave us back a few barrels," Cooper said of the API. "This is one step in
rectifying the imbalance, but we still have another week or two before this is
straightened out."
As its September meeting approaches, talk of what the Organization of the
Petroleum Exporting Countries will do next will play a growing role in
determining oil prices.
On Tuesday, it reacted to remarks by Kuwait's acting oil minister, Ahmad Fahd
al-Ahmad al Sabah, that OPEC should not raise its production quotas at the
September meeting.
OPEC's target price is $22 to $28 a barrel. The "OPEC basket," an average of
seven crudes produced by the cartel and Mexico, usually trades at about a $2
discount to the benchmark contract on the New York Mercantile Exchange, so it's
now around the top of the range.
The United States is encouraging the cartel to hike its quota by 1 million
barrels per day when the oil ministers meet Sept. 19 in Osaka, Japan. Whether
that would make any difference in prices is questionable because the group's
exports are already around that level.
The cartel is producing 1.8 million barrels per day over its current quota of
21.7 million barrels per day, OPEC said earlier this week.
Iraq's disputes with the United Nations, which governs its production, have led
the frequent export disruptions.
Iraq is estimated to be producing 1.7 million barrels per day. The Saudis have
reassured the market it could make up any loss of those exports in a short
period.
Both Nigeria and Algeria are seeking higher quotas. Algeria has already made a
request for the matter to be discussed when ministers meet next month.
But the deciding vote has not been cast. The most influential member of OPEC,
Saudi Arabia, has not given any indication as to which production strategy it
prefers for the rest of 2002.
In other trading Tuesday at the New York Mercantile Exchange, September gasoline
futures gained 94 points to 80.03 cents a gallon, while September heating oil
futures rose 41 points to 73.80 cents a gallon.
Natural gas futures fell 3.1 percent amid concerns that U.S. supplies of the
fuel remain on course to reach record levels by November. September natural gas
was down 10.1 cents to close at $3.166 per thousand cubic feet.
By Michael Davis
Pamola1....
you can call or email him at hao i would surmise..
as far as staying with msev i would think so...
he would stand to lose his options and consultant shares if he does resign.....fgd he only had about $300 worth of stock in his possestion and HAD thousands of shares in options....
that are gonna be way over the current price....so imo had nothing to lose leaving them (fgd).
but i would say greed will keep him in msev and hao.....mo
COMPANY INFORMATION
Contact Information
Address: Suite 990,
1500 West Georgia Street,
Vancouver,
BC,
V6G 2Z6 Phone: 604-692-3220
Fax: 604-632-9849
Web Address: www.habaneroresources.com
E-Mail : jasong@radiant.net
good luck
photonwav
Photon - Should I email him or do you already know whether or not he is staying with MSEV? Just curious.
Thanks
Pam
oh and btw...
jason is staying at hao.....
he's a director there and Michael Sewell is President.(one of the brothers oil and gas brothers).....
this just for your info...
i mean..if one cares..you will never find out by reading the RB board...you learn nothing there....lol
Jump to HAO Forum Jump to HAO Company Snapshot
SUBJECT: RE: Jason's history Posted By: nolimit8
Post Time: 8/21/02 01:28
« Previous Message Next Message »
i spoke with him and he was saying that why is not with fgd is that he had no say in the running of the company and did not want to be involved if there was a roll back. he said he will focus all his time on hao where he has more control. i see this as a good thing for hao. the news says another slight delay, but that the oil was increasing. this is a good thing. sounds like the well will be successful. i dont get why fgd would roll back though. does not make sense.
for the record...
as always all the forth coming events have been forecast by us.
all the research and all with the verification..
i posted long ago a merger may be in the opting...of msev fgd and hao....
TODAY FGD suffered and who called the tune??? i did....
i brought the post from canada about the (potential) 1:16 rollerback at fgd and it sank today..and the delays of the longest delay well!....
now this makes sense for some.....
YOU always get the info here and now with the z1..they had a good well....then they frac'd it....it may come in..may not...they, i guess are trying......
we, on the august 10 email update said in our opinion..get the mississippi next time,...pull up and frac the primary the bend...but we are not mike myers....time will tell but those that follow us.....know the info was here,...we got tired of the excuses and went to see for ourselves....
and on the way of experiencing how NOT to do things we formed Diamond A Energy..( a better way...and we never had to share ANY of our info.. in hindsight for the bashers wish we never did..
only posted photo's and then gave updates.....
we stayed in msev like i said this am..the promises..after coalinga ..msev was to spud (start) texas in MARCH long before ANY of the other companies has ANYTHING going..WHAT a TRUMP..BUT>>>>>>>>>here we are..still waiting.
but we still do dd... the RB board has none nada zero!
BUT as ALWAYS here is something photon SURMISED LOOOOOOOOOOOng ago!
NO way am i an insider..i just researh to the max and have INSIGHT..something bashers will and never have had....
but they are ammussing to read or were..this board ain't ever gonna have them....the cancer of life.
here is the now, being foecast way back.......way back
(and rto is a reverse take over)....no one knows (except the insiders) but how can you meld 3 co's with over 20 million shares apeice? and at one time msev by being on the otcbb, was an unpolished gem..we always had the volume compared to fgd and hao.period....then here came jason to consult then....conrad the president of fgd and their secretary....way after my post below...now the gem has fogged..what a shame....but i see the seeds being planted....time will tell.....
act 1 on deck..for vote...IMHO>>>>
(look at the date mr peabody!)..the way back machine sherman....
« Message list Add to favorite boards
Msg. #
« Previous / Next »
Reply to msg. Post new msg. Email this msg.
By: photonwav $$$$$
14 Apr 2002, 02:38 AM EDT Msg. 14114 of 25700
G T O.......
a pontiac car
R T O.....
a mergered star.
no one knows that's not inside,
but fuel is there for that ride.
as you proceed, this knows NO seed,
only parts in it which could read.
long ago in our e/a start,
middlegate our benfactor came apart.
quick as day, only two days pass
andromeda appears and saves our a$$.
and next the ink for consultants sign
in july and look behind.
a thread of same the tie that binds,
brothers all and all like minds.
and this is when we heard it said,
andromeda first then it has led..
when one becomes the lagest sums,
this the one the one becomes.
brothers have in vancouver yes,
and the same shared bay
in the bahamas best.....
nolan Moss our third suggest.
so one became vicariously,
also three are summarily.
now back to organges,and an apple combine.
when both are equal but different fine.
many have gone this quick merge route,
forego ipo and the hoopla about.
and many successful when they both have gems,
the private melds and the public blends.
photonwav:)
America!
« Message list Add to favorite boards
Msg. #
« Previous / Next »
Reply to msg. Post new msg. Email this msg.
By: photonwav $$$$$
14 Apr 2002, 02:38 AM EDT Msg. 14114 of 25700
G T O.......
a pontiac car
R T O.....
a mergered star.
no one knows that's not inside,
but fuel is there for that ride.
as you proceed, this knows NO seed,
only parts in it which could read.
long ago in our e/a start,
middlegate our benfactor came apart.
quick as day, only two days pass
andromeda appears and saves our a$$.
and next the ink for consultants sign
in july and look behind.
a thread of same the tie that binds,
brothers all and all like minds.
and this is when we heard it said,
andromeda first then it has led..
when one becomes the lagest sums,
this the one the one becomes.
brothers have in vancouver yes,
and the same shared bay
in the bahamas best.....
nolan Moss our third suggest.
so one became vicariously,
also three are summarily.
now back to organges,and an apple combine.
when both are equal but different fine.
many have gone this quick merge route,
forego ipo and the hoopla about.
and many successful when they both have gems,
the private melds and the public blends.
photonwav:)
America!
Here is the latest news for First Goldwater. This will be the last press
release that i will be sending regarding FGD as i resigned today. Please
contact Conrad Clemiss directly at 604-443-0627 or email him
conrad@radiant.net if you have any questions.
Thank you
Jason Gigliotti
FIRST GOLDWATER RESOURCES INC.
Suite 990-1500 W. Georgia St
Vancouver BC. V6G 2Z6
Telephone: (604) 443-0627
Facsimile: (604) 632-9849
August 20, 2002 Trading Symbol: FGD-TSX Venture Exchange
Texas Drilling Update
First Goldwater Resources Inc. (the "Company") reports that the operator has
notified the Company that the testing process on the Z1 Well is slightly
behind schedule. During the initial testing stage, the pump was running at
full capacity and some frac sand filled the pump. This caused a two-day
delay to clean out the tubing and then to run it back down the well. Over
the past three days the pumping unit ran at approximately half of its
capability to avoid the same possible delays. The operator feels that we
should continue to flow the well at these reduced levels for the next 4-7
days and then slowly increase the volume. Over the past three days the
level of oil within the fluids being pumped out of the well has increased
each successive day. Once the level of oil and condensate has stabilized
and the well has flowed at its maximum rate we will be able to provide flow
rates for the well. Once official numbers are achieved they will be
immediately released.
The Green Ranch Prospect is a proposed 15 well program consisting of 4,131
acres of leasehold on the Green Ranch in Stephens County, Texas. This
leasehold is located approximately 50 miles northeast of Abilene, Texas and
approximately 10 miles northwest of Breckenridge, Texas, along the North
Stephens-Shackelford County line. The primary target formation in this
prospect is the Bend Conglomerate at a depth of approximately 4,500 feet.
Secondary target formations are Caddo, Rotten Chert, Mississippian and
Ellenberger. The Company holds a 5% working interest in the Green Ranch
Prospect. 80% of the project is privately held.
The Green Ranch Prospect lies within an oil and gas producing province
identified as Texas Railroad Commission District 7B, which encompasses 24
counties in North Central Texas. TRRC reports indicate District 7B has
produced a total of 2.225 Billion barrels of Oil during the period from 1935
through June of 2001. These reports also indicate the district has made
2.277 TCF of unassociated gas (gas wells) from 1970 through June of 2001.
It is estimated that this district accumulated approximately 2.78 TCF of
casinghead gas. During the year 2000, District 7B made 14.1 Million barrels
of oil, 18.6 BCF of casinghead gas and 45.3 BCF of unassociated gas.
In other corporate news, Jason Gigliotti has resigned as a director and
officer effective immediately from the Company. Mr. Gigliotti has chosen to
focus his time on other business endeavours and we wish to thank him for his
time and commitment he gave to the Company. Please note the new contact
number for the Company will now be 604-443-0627. If you have any questions,
please call Conrad Clemiss, the president of the Company.
WOW...
if Diamond A Energy was drilling right now.....
or in any process on the drill site...
one could view..24/7..what was going on at the drill site!!
through their....DrillCam©
DrillCam©
http://www.diamondaenergy.com/drill_cam.htm
what a novel idea......!
no bs...
can't hide a thing.
live chat, while you watch....
stay tuned.
photonwav
barometers...
fgd..down.02 cdn 84,500 traded..bid .03 ask .05 MORE on this later...
hao... 0 volume at .14 cdn bid .14 ask .16
ygf up .01 at .03 cdn bid .02 ask .03(mailnly imo insider trading anytime it has volume) up (50%) and 80,000 volume
fgd has an interesting (surmised long ago by us) developement occuring that is finally being posted on the cdn boards....
BullBoards Member Forums My BullBoards
Jump to FGD Forum Jump to FGD Company Snapshot
SUBJECT: Consolidation Posted By: ryb10
Post Time: 8/20/02 10:59
In the annual report there is a mention of a CONSOLIDATION of 16:1
Now if I understand correctly- all those that have shares,their capital will be divided by 16..
And the news of the well update is still pending- are they waiting to make an announcement AT the general meeting,after the consolidation passes ?
I am rather pis..d off- having bought some at 0.24(in 2001) and 0.27(and in 2000)..
ryb
Looks like another scheme to get rich gone with the wind..
ok way back months ago we postulated would the 3 co's (most likely not ygf)
hao,fgd, msev merge.....
remember photon this was probably 6 months ago i posted ..
a gto is a fast car....
and an RTO... (reverse take over) mainly brothers oil and gas merging into the public comapnies...
we all hear of jason touting the europeans..
and some great thing in august...
well maybe thats it..consolidation..mo and only time will tell
WHO KNOWS..and i for one..who cares!
now at one time we invested in msev because.....
coming off coalinga they were to spud texas in MARCH..LONG before ANY of the companies in coalinga had ANYTHING on the radar..it would have been a trump card.....
WE all know what happenend....
delays....delays and more delays.....
time lines never made ....ridiculous.....
only a fool does not change in sync with with current information...
now here we are..Diamond A Energy took the time to FIND out.
took pictures.. said nothing but draw own conclusions.
post continual updates of facts..period....
at this point in time no one is touting Mike Myers and the work on the z1..we only post facts.....make your own conclusions..
NOW IN WELLS ANYTHING CAN HAPPEN
BUT FOR OUR FRIENDS.... READ OUR AUGUST 10 UPDATE ON THE Z1 FROM OUR EMAIL UPDATES....
THE PEPTO BISMAL POST...this is OUR opinion ONLY>
Again anything is possible, we only want to clarify in no way by our posting the photo's or the updates are they anything but true information...
and by no updates from the Companies on the last pr....
with the time line..today is tuesday and no results....
draw your own conclusions....
photonwav
Energy News
08/20 10:41
N.Y. Crude Oil Rises to $30/Barrel for 1st Time Since May 2001
By Mark Shenk
New York, Aug. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Crude-oil futures in New York rose to $30 a barrel for the first time since May 2001 on concern that an American Petroleum Institute report later today will show the sixth decline in U.S. inventories in seven weeks.
Analysts were divided on whether the institute would report a rise or decline for the week ended Friday. With inventories already at their lowest level in a year and a half, the risk of another decline outweighs the benefits from a rise, traders said.
``We're worried about the API report later today,'' said Phil Flynn, a senior energy trader at Alaron Trading Corp. in Chicago. ``Nobody correctly predicted last week's crude-oil number, so we're on edge about this report. Stockpiles are overdue for a rise but I don't believe we'll get it.''
Crude oil for September delivery was up 11 cents at $29.95 a barrel at 10:28 a.m. on the New York Mercantile Exchange after reaching $30.10, the highest price since May 21, 2001. The September futures contract expires today.
The more-active October crude-oil contract was up 8 cents at $28.88 a barrel.
In London, the October Brent crude-oil futures contract was unchanged at $27.26 a barrel on the International Petroleum Exchange.
U.S. crude-oil stockpiles plunged 3.1 percent to 295.6 million barrels in the week ended Aug. 9, last week's report from the Petroleum Institute showed. It was the lowest stockpile level since March 2001.
Analyst Forecasts
Of the nine analysts in a Bloomberg survey, five expected the institute to report a rise in inventories and four forecast a decline. The report on supplies in the week ended Friday is scheduled for release at around 4:30 p.m. New York time.
Prices have risen 17 percent over the past two months partly on expectations that the U.S. is preparing for an invasion of Iraq, the Middle East's fourth-biggest producer.
U.S. President George W. Bush has called for Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's ouster on the grounds that he is pursuing nuclear, biological and chemical weapons that threaten neighboring countries and the U.S. Bush has said he has no timetable for an attack.
Kuwaiti Oil Minister Sheikh Ahmad Fahd al-Ahmad al-Sabah said the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries can compensate for any halt in Iraqi oil supplies stemming from an attack, according to the Russian daily Vremya Novostei.
OT: wingnut..
you're looking at wyoming gas developement.
waiting on tests for commerical on first well...
subsequentely gone forward and tendered an offer to aquire another player in the meantime on the field.
down form highs of .80 to .10
low volume..high volume trading is in the 1/2 million share day to make it move.
imo.
photonwav
Good Day everyone! Thanks a bunch guys for the latest Z1 Photos, nice to see some progress! Too bad the "Slickster" doesn't pay heed and post his/their own photos to keep the investors up to date. I think it's kind of like the "give us a call anytime" spiel, a picture is worth a thousand words! Hard to record a phone conversation eh?
Anyone know anything about Powder River Basin Gas?
PRVB is the symbol.
Hello Gents, and Ladies nice to see some sanity on a message board. Hoping for flow rates today or soon???
Hawkeye
The pics I was referring to were taken 8/17.
Pam
Oh BTW, thank you for the pics!!
Ex.
Looks like the casing(gas?)valve is cracked open a little and the oil valve(tubing) is open as well. Was the jack pumping when the photos were taken? Does anyone know what the pressure gauges read on casing and tubing?? Please correct if i am wrong.
Ex.
Hawkeye1.....
i wanted to make sure you saw the newest photo's of z1...
along with all the updates and free video's of the well fracturing and the well acidizing...
email us at our address on our "contact us" page:
http://www.diamondaenergy.com/contact_us.htm
Once you send us the email (just type in "hi" so email sends)....
our server will send an automatic response back to your email with the Z1 update information. And the NEWEST PHOTO'S link is given to cut and paste in your browser to view.
once you send us your email..make sure you check your email for the automatic response..which has the information.
photonwav
Oil Prices
Last trade 29.84 Change +0.57 (+1.94%)
Settle 29.84 Open 29.45
Previous Close 29.33 High 29.95
Low 29.07 Bid 29.62 Ask 29.85
Pamola1..were you able to get pics from today all I can find are 8/17 TIA EVH
Hi guys!
Just wanted to say "THANK YOU" for the Z-1 updates and photos as well as all the other informative posts on NG.
I'm still "keeping the faith"!
Pam
NYMEX Natural Gas
August 19th Settlement Prices
Sep 2002 3.267 +.118
Oct 3.327 +.119
Nov 3.602 +.114
Dec 3.861 +.104
Jan 2003 3.998 +.101
Feb 3.963 +.098
Mar 3.902 +.095
Apr 3.787 +.089
May 3.790 +.091
Jun 3.800 +.092
Jul 3.820 +.092
Aug 3.830 +.092
futures spike again....
http://test.crbindex.com/crb/quotes_chart.asp?sym=us@NG.1
Energy Futures Jump
Compliments of the Oil & Gas Journal
Market watch: Reduced inventories, increased war risks drive up energy prices
By OGJ editors
HOUSTON, Aug.16 -- Energy futures prices jumped in New York and London on Thursday as markets reacted to the surprise of a serious draw of US inventories of oil and petroleum products at a time when traders are becoming more concerned about possible disruption of Middle East crude supplies.
The September contract for benchmark US light, sweet crudes shot up 91¢ to $29.06/bbl on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The October position jumped 81¢ to $28.38/bbl.
Prices for refined products also escalated, with heating oil for September delivery rising 2.64¢ to 72.78¢/gal. Unleaded gasoline for the same month was up 2.12¢ to 79.76¢/gal.
The September natural gas contract zoomed up 21.7¢ to $3.13/Mcf on NYMEX. "Some traders had anticipated a higher (US gas) storage injection last week than the 53 bcf reported by the (US Energy Information Administration on Thursday) morning, and that helped get the rally started," said analysts at Enerfax Daily. "Once the market rallied beyond $3.059(/Mcf), then buy-stop orders got hit, pushing up the September contract to $3.10(/Mcf). Then late buying by funds pushed it higher yet near the end of the day."
Enerfax analysts warned Friday, "Look for profit-taking today as the market tries to stay above $3(/Mcf). Resistance is seen at $3.17(/Mcf), with support at $3.05(/Mcf)."
Meanwhile, Ronald Barone, with UBS Warburg LLC in New York, said Friday, "The 6-week string of above normal temperatures came to an abrupt end last week, as the nation experienced only its fourth week of cooler than normal conditions this season." National cooling degree-day temperatures for the week ending Aug. 10 were 4% lower than normal and 22% lower than last year, he said.
"Though temperatures were slightly cooler than normal, we believe it is impressive that the industry was capable of injecting a solid 53 bcf of gas during a time when—as evidenced by continued weak net gas flows in the producing region—several cash-strapped energy merchants are not injecting (or are in fact withdrawing) supplies to improve liquidity positions," said Barone. "This notable undercurrent could suggest that the short-term supply-demand imbalance is looser than it appears and that cash prices are being primarily supported by NYMEX, which itself is being supported by the increasingly bullish intermediate-term outlook from a recent acceleration in deliverability decline rates and crude rally."
So far this summer, US temperatures generally are averaging 10% higher than normal and 2% higher than during the same period last year.
In London, technical strengths and bullish sentiment also pushed up North Sea Brent crude futures on the International Petroleum Exchange. The expectation that the US will again go to war with Iraq remains as strong as ever in that market and has attracted heavy fund and speculator buying, said brokers. They said traders did not want to sell short in case a US attack on Iraq sends oil prices soaring higher.
The September Brent oil contract gained 42¢ to $26.80/bbl Thursday, which was "another bullish technical signal" in itself, analysts said. However, the September natural gas contract fell 6.6¢ to the equivalent of $1.88/Mcf on the IPE.
The average price for the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries' basket of seven benchmark crudes jumped 46¢ to $26.34/bbl Thursday.
Monday 8/19 Z-1 Photo Updates are MUST SEE and available now at Diamond A Energy once you submit an Email requesting the upgraded link containing these newly updated photos of the Z-1 Well.
These photos are some of the best posted to date.
Our new website is:
http://www.DiamondAenergy.com
Followers
|
4
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
482
|
Created
|
07/09/02
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |