Being scammed SUCKS!!!!!!

[the_worm06]

yep, nothing surprises me.

the same type of "sneaky" that LBWR showed by failing to file an 8-K with the SEC for the removal of Marlin Williford as its CFO, something which is a material event and therefore required for LBWR, which is an SEC reporting company, according to the company itself

[EarnestDD]

Yeah ... that kind of "Sneaky".

Why wouldn't Labwire refer to USIS in the latest PR?

Something is amiss imo.

[the_worm06]

Sneaky?.....You might remember the "sneaky" LBWR press releases that fully described new contracts obtained by LBWR in the canine security and surveillance business whithout stating that all the business, except a 5% share of the revenues, went to a separate private company, 50% owned by the CEO of LBWR, Dexter Morris

[EarnestDD]

Labwire issued two PR's in May and June about its alliance with USIS.
Then ... no more mention.

Multiple alliances were desired by the May/08 PR so there is also a good chance that the "service units" are NOT with USIS and Labwire is being a little sneaky with this latest PR.

"We see this as a first step in expanding our client base through alliances as well as direct sales and acquisition opportunities. Labwire will continue to seek this type of alliance agreement with other major companies offering various services."

[the_worm06]

I would imagine that USIS finally did the research on LBWR that it should have done in the beginning when LBWR issued that press release with USIS' name on it.

[EarnestDD]

That is a possibility too.
Big companies like USIS do NOT like their name being used in PR's to promote a stock.

Just like Greyhound, USIS will eventually separate itself from LBWR

[the_worm06]

Just like Greyhound, USIS will eventually separate itself from LBWR

[EarnestDD]

That makes sense to me.
USIS most likely objected to Labwire using its name in Press Releases.

Hmmm ... not on the best of terms???

[the_worm06]

yes, Earnest, it appears that USIS has asked LBWR to stop using its name

==============



Posted by: EarnestDD Date: Saturday, February 07, 2009 6:12:42 PM
In reply to: Creede Bighorns who wrote msg# 10645 Post # of 10653

Interestingly enough, Labwire does not refer to USIS in its latest PR but simply highlights the News Release for its alliance partner.

Hmmm ... I wonder if USIS asked Labwire to stop using its name?

[the_worm06]

if the babybulls.com client list consists of a mass email spam blast and if the information sent in the mass email spam blast is false and misleading, then the SEC and US Attorneys Office would have something to say about it eventually.

and since babybullls.com has over 500,000 members, then you would know the answer to your own question



=============


Posted by: Creede Bighorns Date: Saturday, February 07, 2009 5:48:51 PM
In reply to: the_worm06 who wrote msg# 1493 Post # of 1522

That's not what I asked. I asked you if you were saying there was something wrong with Babybulls sending their clients emails for companies that they have been paid to IR.

[The Real Titan]

I honestly don't think its a matter of being confused, I truly believe that most of those people we see becoming "believers," are really just naive investors who actually believe they are provided some sort of protection by the SEC.

Most assume that these companies can not blatantly lie, mislead and dupe the public so obviously.

But they ALL have the rose colored glasses ripped from their faces, thrown on the ground and stepped on...lol

[creede]

That's not what I asked. I asked you if you were saying there was something wrong with Babybulls sending their clients emails for companies that they have been paid to IR.

[chefdujour]

Couldn't have said it better myself.lol

[the_worm06]

wrong againg

the shares were issued in the 2005 3rd quarter, not in 2004 as you say.

[LORD_FARQUAAD]

Great Board. Thanks

[Robsct]

I didn't say that at all. I asked if that was what you were saying. Is it? You said they issued 100 PR's per year. I want to know where you came up with that number!

[the_worm06]

let see, yet another false and misleading post

by your own words, LBWR issued 8 PR's in one month

at what annual rate would 8 PR's per month be?



================


Posted by: Robsct Date: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:16:26 PM
In reply to: the_worm06 who wrote msg# 1515 Post # of 1516

Your statement of one hundred PR's per year was false and misleading. In a month time 3 years ago you're now saying they issued two per week so that averages 100 per year when actually they might have issued 8 PR's once during a short period of time? LOL

[Robsct]

Your statement of one hundred PR's per year was false and misleading. In a month time 3 years ago you're now saying they issued two per week so that averages 100 per year when actually they might have issued 8 PR's once during a short period of time? LOL

[the_worm06]

a rate of a hundred PR's per year imply that the company has issued about 2 press releases per week for certain periods of time.

Are you denying that LBWR has been involved in such active PR issuance during certain periods of time?



===========


Posted by: Robsct Date: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:03:25 PM
In reply to: the_worm06 who wrote msg# 1511 Post # of 1514

LOL! A hundred per year?? That's a "massive" joke!

[Robsct]

LOL! A hundred PR's per year?? That's a "massive" joke!

[the_worm06]

yes, it seems that almost ever post in the last month by this person thas been false..

that would be really hard to do even if you purposely attempted to do it

[scion]

Some people are easily confused.

January 18, 2009

It has not been proven;
that babybulls.com is a sleazy firm
that they ever recieved a million shares from Labwire
And it IS certain that they never tried very hard to promote Labwire or it's stock pps.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=34906787

May 19, 2008

And the babybulls shares were gobbled up in a few big volume days. Now we have bashers trying to shake loose shares. They've been working hard over the weekend! A definite typical pattern. Yup! Labwires future looks bright to me. JMHO.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=29396070

[the_worm06]

so LBWR releasing PR's at the rate of about 100 per year is not releasing a lot of PR's?




========

Posted by: Robsct Date: Saturday, February 07, 2009 3:44:19 PM
In reply to: The Real Titan who wrote msg# 1499 Post # of 1510

They rarely release PR's in my opinion.

[the_worm06]

yes, almost five years since LBWR first started trading and they come up with a new term to describe their business

"service unit"

[EarnestDD]

Service unit ... is that just nonmenclature for a doctors office where they dropped off some forms?

[The Real Titan]

Okay, I'm sorry, maybe the aren't even good at doing that well...lol

[scion]

What is a "service unit"?

By: carmelbeach
06 Feb 2009, 03:46 PM EST
Rating: You rated it: Msg. 2667 of 2673
Jump to msg. #

2/6/09 PR: Implements Additional Service Units

A cynical person might think this PR was rushed out to distract from the revelation of the criminal record of the Labwire auditor.

I googled: Labwire "service units"
and the only hits are this new PR, so "service unit(s)" doesn't appear to be a term ever specifically used before by Labwire.
Does anyone even know what it means, concretely?

[The Real Titan]

It may or may not be a scam, but it is most definitely a Pump & Dump...lol

End result is about the same, for those who "believe."

[the_worm06]

yes, in fact, it is the first time since LBWR has been public that the term "service units" have appeared in any kind of LBWR press release, SEC filing or pinksheets filing

[The Real Titan]

No, we must now listen to 20 post's on his level of admission not being what it could or should have been....lmao

[Robsct]

They rarely release PR's in my opinion.

[The Real Titan]

There's nothing there that show's that they have any actual revenue anyways....lol

[scion]

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=27647979

[The Real Titan]

Why would I waste my time trying to convince you of anything.

You wouldn't, because you can't, pretty simple...lol

[The Real Titan]

Roflmao... the only actual indication we can see is that they are fairly consistent at releasing PR's.

I would take it even a step further in saying they are extremely good at releasing PR's, albeit filled with fantasy and BS...lol

[The Real Titan]

Yes, seem's like he's finally starting to catch on. Good to see your efforts will manage to save him some $$$ in the long run.

[The Real Titan]

I see your fairly new to these markets...lol

Well stick around, I really think with will turn out to be a valuable lesson you NEED to learn.

Unfortunately, it's going to probably be an expensive lesson for you, so be sure not to repeat it...lol

[The Real Titan]

Your not really claiming a PR as documented proof are you?

Please tell me this is not what your placing your faith in....lol

[the_worm06]

there you go

as you say

[wink wink]

by the way, what part of my post was false and misleading?

here it is:

Posted by: the_worm06 Date: Saturday, February 07, 2009 1:40:05 PM
In reply to: Creede Bighorns who wrote msg# 1489 Post # of 1495

You might want to read the SEC and U.S. Attorneys Office litigation releases that include defendants involved in mass email/fax blasts that included false and misleading information about the company





==============================


Posted by: Robsct Date: Saturday, February 07, 2009 2:25:11 PM
In reply to: the_worm06 who wrote msg# 1493 Post # of 1494

More false and misleading statements

There is no interest whatsoever in Labwire's past PR by the SEC or US Attorney's office

[Robsct]

More false and misleading statements

No facts, just innuendo

[the_worm06]

You might want to read the SEC and U.S. Attorneys Office litigation releases that include defendants involved in mass email/fax blasts that included false and misleading information about the company



===============


So Babybulls is not allowed to send emails to their members?

Too funny.

[the_worm06]

particularly if includes

1. false and misleading statements

and

2. is paid by the company


BINGO!



================

Posted by: EarnestDD Date: Saturday, February 07, 2009 1:04:47 PM
In reply to: Robsct who wrote msg# 1487 Post # of 1491

It only takes ONE email campaign to get the SEC's interest.

Doesn't even have to be a large one.

It just goes to the integrity of the company in general.

[the_worm06]

How many "members" do you think that babybulls.com has?


100,000?
500,000?
1 million?
5 million?
20 million?


at what point is it considered a mass email blast?


If babybulls.com sent one email to 1 million members, or 1/2 milion members, or 300,000 members, or 200,000 members, or 100,000 members, IT WOULD BE CONSIDERED A MASS EMAIL BLAST



================


One or two e-mails in a year is NOT a "mass e-mail campaign" as you alledged in your post and that's what I meant in my post. There was no "campaign" to promote Labwire stock. No pump and dump at all. Investors were very upset about how little babybulls did for Labwire.

[EarnestDD]

It only takes ONE email campaign to get the SEC's interest.

Doesn't even have to be a large one.

It just goes to the integrity of the company in general.

[creede]

So Babybulls is not allowed to send emails to their members?

Too funny.

[Mr. Zen]

New Program for Top Executives passes sales milestone.


BendOver.com (BENO) Trailer Town AK is pleased to report that its new software program Stickittoya has been a huge success amongst CEO’s and other top executives.
Bend Over, one of the top software programmers for executives holds exclusive rights to the software program designed to help CEO’s and their lackeys write compelling press releases. These press releases are designed to make their company look like the ‘stock de jour’ among fresh meat investors and other inexperienced stock market wannabe’s

Mr. Jack (Whitey) Trash CEO of BendOver and mayor of Trailer Town stated: “this is the easiest press release software on the market today with its multiple choice, fill in the blanks, approach to compelling press releases. Busy executives can now complete the arduous task of shareholder communication in less time then it takes to add sunscreen to their fat bellies”.

The multiple choice standard smoke screen answers were compiled by Jonathan Ledhead a well known stock hype guru and fake promises master. Part of the program is listed below


Financial Section (choose only one)

We have retired 14,000, 000 shares of our stock. (use this answer when you retire restricted stock and issue free trading stock)… also please gag your Transfer Agent before and after the event
We plan to Uplist our stock. (use this answer when you apply for form 15-c-2-11, and do not mention the one to two year time frame to complete the process, also use the word Uplist as a code word for stupidity rather than the accepted word of transfer to a new exchange).

Upgrade version Stickittoya 1.0 will also detect home addresses in trailer parks and automatically shift address to local UPS mail drop within walking distance to cell phone superstore.

For more information on this unique program please contact head office on Fairytale lane.

[Robsct]

One or two e-mails in a year is NOT a "mass e-mail campaign" as you alledged in your post and that's what I meant in my post. There was no "campaign" to promote Labwire stock. No pump and dump at all. Investors were very upset about how little babybulls did for Labwire.

[the_worm06]

"email from babybulls just came out."





http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=13939152

Posted by: zigbee Date: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 1:04:30 PM
In reply to: None Post # of 10585

LBWR - BabyBulls.com..........

email from babybulls just came out.

----------------------------------------------------------

Revealing Undervalued Micro and Small Cap Companies


Labwire, Inc.Update - October 11, 2006



Stock Symbol:


LBWR

Profile Price:


$0.085

Shares Out:


136 million

Float:


9.8 million

Outlook:


Growth

Labwire, Inc.
Third quarter revenue numbers are out and Labwire, Inc. (LBWR) has once again outperformed expectations. Through the first nine months of 2006, LBWR reported gross revenue of $2,674,767 compared to $1,758,132 during the same period in 2005. This represents an increase of $916,635 or 52%. In addition, the $2.6 million in gross revenue reported for the first nine months of 2006 represents more than 100% of LBWR’s gross revenue reported for all of 2005.

And, not only is revenue up, it is up across the board. According the results reported in the press release, LBWR experienced growth across all of its business segments, including: (i) employee screening services, which increased 29% in the second quarter of 2006 over the same period in 2005; (ii) canine security and surveillance, which increased 314% in the second quarter of 2006 over the same period in 2005; and (iii) management services, which generated $14,967 in the second quarter of 2006 compared to zero revenue during the same period in 2005.

Based on the numbers from the press release summarized above, LBWR’s growth in revenue is absolutely terrific, it is hard to complain about being up 52% year to date. However, as BabyBulls.com looks more closely at the numbers, we believe significant upside potential exists based on the following: (i) 2006 revenue up 52% year to date compared to the same period in 2005; (ii) 2006 revenue has been relatively flat when comparing consecutive quarter results; (iii) on June 15, 2006, LBWR announced a 3-year agreement valued at $1.8 million annually; and (iv) on October 3, 2006 LBWR announced an additional agreement with leading petrochemical company valued at up to $2.25 million annually.

So, what does all this mean?

BabyBulls.com believes it means the following: (i) the $1.8 million annual agreement probably is not reflected in the current numbers; (ii) the 29% growth in employee screening services probably is 100% organic; and (iii) the 314% growth in canine security and surveillance reflects the continued acquisition of recurring security contracts, which could continue to grow even faster as a result of the October 3, 2006 announcement.

BabyBulls.com continues to be excited about LBWR as a result of it recent financial results and because of its anticipated future opportunities. Similarly, BabyBulls.com does not believe that LBWR’s current share price reflects the intrinsic value of Company. Below is an excerpt of today’s press release, a complete copy of which can be found at http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/061011/0171323.html.

Labwire Gross Revenue Up 52 Percent Year to Date
HOUSTON , TX - Oct 11, 2006 -- Labwire, Inc. (Other OTC:LBWR), a leading provider of employee screening solutions and canine security and surveillance services, is pleased to announce year to date and third quarter revenue results.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, Labwire's gross revenue was $2,674,767 compared to $1,758,132 during the same period in 2005. This represents an increase of $916,635 or 52%. The Company experienced growth during the first nine months of 2006 across: (i) employee screening services, which increased 29% compared to the same period in 2005; (ii) canine security and surveillance, which increased 314% compared to the same period in 2005; and (iii) management services, which generated $14,967 compared to zero revenue during the same period in 2005.

To view the complete release, click here.

For information on other promising emerging growth micro-cap companies, please visit us at: www.babybulls.com.

Disclaimer: This information is provided by BabyBulls.com to provide readers with information on selected publicly traded companies. The reader should verify all claims and complete his or her own due diligence before investing in any securities of profiled companies. BabyBulls.com has been retained to provide investor relations services for some of the companies mentioned in this profile and receives compensation for those services. Further, BabyBulls.com and its employees and affiliates may own, or may purchase and sell, securities of the companies profiled. BabyBulls.com undertakes no obligation to inform readers about the ownership or trading activities of it or its employees or affiliates in the securities of the profiled companies. BabyBulls.com has the following compensation arrangements with the companies profiled in this email: Labwire one million shares of restricted common stock. Neither BabyBulls.com nor anyone involved in the publication of this email is a registered investment adviser or broker/dealer. BabyBulls.com makes no recommendation that the purchase of securities of companies profiled in this email is suitable or advisable for any person or that an investment in such securities will be profitable. In general, given the nature of the companies profiled and the lack of an active trading market for their securities, investing in such securities is highly speculative and carries a high degree of risk. An investor in such securities should be prepared and able to bear a loss of his or her entire investment. Nothing in this email should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities of any profiled company. See the babybulls.com website for full disclaimer information.

To opt-out of future announcements and correspondence from babybulls.com, click here and enter the email address you registered under.

a Production of BabyBulls.com
Posts are IMO. Do your own DD and make your own decisions. Good luck to all!

[EarnestDD]

Ouch.

[the_worm06]

"Got a nice e-mail blurb from babybulls.com"


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=11567930

Posted by: Robsct Date: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 3:37:51 PM
In reply to: Creede Bighorns who wrote msg# 1500 Post # of 10585

Got a nice e-mail blurb from babybulls.com. It looks good but they misquoted the float and shares out.

Shares Out:
136.6 million

Float:
9.8 million

Wonder where they got their info from.