Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Really, Why is there no symbol?
Yes I still own it????
The truth of the matter:
What’s this have to do with Adot. Adot was a scam from day one. Instead of mining for gold, or uranium and or drugs, Adot crooks choose a less glamorous carrot to use as bait. That was electronic signage. I think the adot officers might have thrown in a mine in there somewhere, just to try to keep up interest.
Rip off all the way. Maybe someone will buy the shell and give original shareholders a day to sell out. I doubt that though.
The truth? The whole post and the linked board are NOT the truth.
Not even close. There are so many levels of confusion and conspiracy theories in the contents that the writings shouldn't be taken seriously.
You forgot to mention that the adot officers are being sued by the SEC.
The truth of the matter:
ADOT, (currently along with 225 other stocks as of 10-13-11), is on the non-DTC eligible list.
The reason for this DTCC status, though excused in various other ways by the publicly traded company and/or brokerage houses, is quite simple: questionable unregistered shares were issued.
Finding anyone to admit this publicly is impossible though. The SEC no more wants to acknowledge the fallout of unregistered shares than they wanted to acknowledge the fallout of allowing MMs the right to 'maintain an orderly market', ie; naked shorting.
While unregistered shares in themselves is not technically a crime, the problem they created is why the DTCC refuses to clear trading in them electronically. That problem is: unregistered shares opened the door to counterfeit shares, and the DTCC does not want to be caught holding/clearing counterfeit shares any longer.
(Yes, stock certificates can be counterfeited no differently than money. Perhaps easier, since U.S. currency is becoming more and more difficult to counterfeit.)
One might think that they are safe with trading in a non-DTCC eligible stock so long as their brokerage firm does their own self-clearing or uses some other clearing house besides the DTCC. For the time being, this is most likely true. However, there are indications that clearing of stocks with unregistered shares issued may very well eventually be coming to an end, at the current trade rates. The costs for such clearing is slowly becoming unbearable. The risk of clearing stocks that may have counterfeit shares is growing daily and the revenue generated from doing so is becoming unjustified. This is why brokerage firms are starting to charge exorbinent rates to physically clear certain stocks, ie; those with (questionable) unregistered shares. Physical clearing ensures the shares bought or sold are authentic, and not counterfeited or naked shorted.
It should be clearly understood, the precedence the DTCC is setting by requiring physical delivery of certain stocks. It is not greed on the part of just one clearing house. It is instead, precaution on their part, for a problem they are anticipating will be growing, and perhaps growing out of control.
No one will deny naked shorting exists, nor can it be denied it is growing. Nothing has changed to divert it yet. Nothing has changed to stop counterfeiting of stock certificates, either. It doesn't take any stretch of the imagination to see where counterfeit and/or naked shares will lead. The DTCC is merely putting their foot down and protecting themselves from clearing any stocks with questionable shares issued.
One only needs to comprehend the magnitude of this physical clearing action taken by a large clearing house to understand how/why this very same action will become commonplace at all brokerage firms, in due time.
GLTA and trade wisely!
For more on the DTCC issues, visit: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=22531
United States OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Release No. 9247 / August 1, 2011
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 64998 / August 1, 2011
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-14274
In the Matter of
DIVINE CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, DANIELLE HUGHES AND MICHAEL BUONOMO
Respondents.
ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND SECTION 15(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AS TO DIVINE CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC AND DANIELLE HUGHES
http://sec.gov/litigation/admin/2011/33-9247.pdf
On February 25, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) instituted public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) against Divine Capital Markets, LLC (“Divine”), and Danielle Bionda Hughes (“Hughes”), among others.
II.
Divine and Hughes (collectively the “Respondents”) have each submitted an Offer of Settlement (the “Offers”), which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over them and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, the Respondents consent to the entry of this Order Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of
On the basis of this Order and Respondents’ Offers, the Commission finds1 that:
A. RESPONDENTS
1. Divine Capital Markets, LLC is a broker-dealer registered with the Commission with its principal office located in New York. During the relevant period, Divine conducted a general securities business through its registered representatives and traders; and participated in the offering of shares of Advanced Optics Electronics Inc.
2. Danielle Hughes, age 41, is a New Jersey resident. Throughout the relevant period, Hughes held a controlling interest in, and was a person associated with, Divine. Hughes was also Divine’s Chief Executive Officer and its General Securities Principal responsible for supervision of equities, institutional and retail sales. From approximately June 3, 2006 through September 6, 2006, Hughes was also Divine’s Chief Compliance Officer.
3. Michael Buonomo, age 36, is a New Jersey resident. Throughout the relevant period, Buonomo was a registered representative associated with Divine and participated in the offering of shares of Advanced Optics Electronics Inc. Throughout much of the relevant period, Buonomo reported to Hughes, who was his supervisor.
B. OTHER RELEVANT ENTITIES
1. Advanced Optics Electronics Inc. (“ADOT”) is a currently inactive Nevada corporation formerly headquartered in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Throughout the relevant period, ADOT’s common stock was registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. During the period of January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2007, ADOT’s shares were quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “ADOT” and its shares ranged between $0.00013 and $0.001 per share. ADOT was a development stage corporation with no earnings, no operating revenues and no final products. Throughout the relevant period, ADOT’s common shares were penny stocks within the meaning of Rule 3a51-1 under the Exchange Act.
2. JDC Swan Inc. (“JDC Swan”) is a Florida corporation wholly owned by Jason Claffey.
3. Jason Claffey (“Claffey”), age 36, is a Florida resident. Claffey is the president and sole owner of JDC Swan. Through JDC Swan, Claffey acquired over 9.8 billion shares of ADOT
1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondents’ Offers of Settlement and are not binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
directly from the issuer and sold them shortly thereafter -- without a registration statement in effect or on file -- into the public markets through an account he established at Divine.
C. FACTS
1. From at least as early as January 2006 through approximately June 2007, Claffey, through his company, JDC Swan, acquired a total of over 9.8 billion shares of ADOT in private transactions directly with the company. None of the 9.8 billion ADOT share certificates bore a restrictive legend.
2. On or about February 27, 2006, Claffey contacted Buonomo to open a securities account at Divine for the purpose of liquidating shares of bulletin board and pink sheet companies. Buonomo did not know Claffey and conducted no due diligence into the securities he intended to sell. Nevertheless, on or about February 27, 2006, Hughes approved the opening of the JDC Swan account. On February 28, 2006, Buonomo -- with Hughes’ approval -- began publicly offering and selling unregistered shares of ADOT through Claffey’s JDC Swan account.
3. In a span of two weeks, from February 28, 2006, through March
13, 2006, Claffey offered and sold a total of 325 million restricted shares through Divine. By September 4, 2006, the total ADOT restricted shares offered and sold through Divine had grown to over 2 billion for proceeds of over $1 million.
4. From February 28, 2006, and continuing through June 2007, Buonomo offered and sold a total of over 9.8 billion shares of ADOT on behalf of JDC Swan, without a registration statement in effect or on file, generating over $60,000 in commissions for Divine on sale proceeds of over $2 million. Throughout the period, Buonomo memorialized numerous deliveries of ADOT certificates and sales in Divine’s electronic client relationship database which was available to, and monitored by, Hughes.
5. Claffey sent the ADOT certificates to Buonomo, who forwarded them to Divine’s clearing broker, who then arranged to have the shares put in “street name.” When the shares were ready for sale, Buonomo notified Claffey, who then placed the sale orders. Buonomo accepted the orders and arranged for the sales to be executed by a market maker. After execution, Claffey periodically sent wire requests to Buonomo to withdraw the sale proceeds. These wire requests were in some cases approved by Hughes.
6. The offers and sales of the 9.8 billion shares of ADOT were made without a registration statement in effect or on file and with no valid exemptions from registration. All of the offers and sales made use of means or instruments of transportation or communications in interstate commerce or of the mails.
7. Both Buonomo and Hughes knew or should have known that Claffey
and JDC Swan had acquired the ADOT shares directly from the issuer. At no point did Buonomo or Hughes perform adequate due diligence to determine if there was a registration statement in effect or on file with respect to the offers and sales of ADOT shares.
a. Hughes Failed Reasonably to Supervise Buonomo By Ignoring Red Flags
1. In addition to being Divine’s majority owner and CEO, Hughes was Buonomo’s direct supervisor during some of the relevant period and was a General Securities Principal at Divine. From approximately June 3, 2006 to September 6, 2006, Hughes also assumed the role of Divine’s Chief Compliance Officer. Hughes was also responsible for reviewing Divine’s trade tickets for unusual concentrations, specifically to determine whether the trade tickets “involved sizable positions in a single security.”
2. From the inception of the account, Hughes ignored red flags that the ADOT sales constituted an unregistered distribution. Shortly after the JDC Swan account was opened, Hughes was put on notice that the JDC Swan account would be selling share certificates received from an issuer. On the very first day of trading, Buonomo alerted Hughes that he had sold 45 million shares from the first (65-million share) ADOT certificate that Divine had received. Buonomo further advised Hughes that Divine would receive another share certificate the following day. Throughout the relevant period, Buonomo memorialized JDC Swan’s certificate deliveries and sales in Divine’s electronic client relationship database. Hughes was an administrator of the database and accessed the system frequently.
3. In late August 2006, Buonomo alerted Hughes that the JDC Swan account had delivered a certificate for 65 million shares and asked if he could execute sales of these shares. On this occasion, Hughes instructed Buonomo to obtain the stock purchase agreements, which showed that JDC Swan had acquired the shares directly from ADOT. On at least one occasion, Hughes forwarded the stock purchase agreement to facilitate the ADOT sales.
4. In September 2006, Hughes hired a new Chief Compliance Officer who alerted her on several occasions to the large number of ADOT shares flowing through the JDC Swan account. Hughes failed to take appropriate steps to prevent the sales or to ensure that the sales were either registered or exempt from registration.
b. Hughes and Divine Failed Reasonably to Supervise Buonomo By Maintaining Inadequate Supervisory Procedures
From approximately June 3, 2006 through September 6, 2006, Hughes was responsible for developing and maintaining the firm’s supervisory policies and procedures. Throughout the February 27, 2006 through July 2007 period, Divine’s supervisory policies were inadequate to provide guidance to supervisors regarding the appropriate inquiry to determine whether the public sale of shares acquired directly or indirectly from an issuer was prohibited by Section 5 of the Securities Act. The policies did not address unregistered distributions through statutory underwriters. The supervisory procedures also failed to address situations in which certificates without restrictive legends were acquired by a customer from an issuer with a view to distribution. If Hughes and Divine had developed reasonable policies and procedures requiring appropriate due diligence in situations in which a customer sold large blocks of illiquid stock in a little-known company and prohibited re-sales of such shares, the firm likely would have prevented and detected Buonomo’s violations of Section 5
D. VIOLATIONS
1. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondent Divine willfully2 committed violations of Sections 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act, which makes it unlawful for any person directly or indirectly to make use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell or to offer to sell securities unless a registration statement has been filed as to such security.
2. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondent Hughes failed reasonably to supervise Buonomo with a view to detecting and preventing his violations of Sections 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act.
E. UNDERTAKINGS
1. Respondent Hughes undertakes to provide to the Commission, within 30 days after the end of the 4 month suspension period described below, an affidavit stating that she has complied fully with the sanctions described in Section IV.D. below.
2. Respondent Divine undertakes to provide to the Commission, within 30 days after the end of the 12 month suspension period described below, an affidavit stating that it has complied fully with the sanctions described in Section IV.C. below.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondents’ Offers.
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act and Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Respondent Divine is censured.
B. Respondent Divine cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Section 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act.
C. Respondent Divine be and hereby is, suspended from participating, directly or indirectly, in any offering of a penny stock, including: acting directly or indirectly as a promoter, finder, consultant, agent or other person who engages in activities with another broker, dealer or issuer for purposes of the issuance or trading in any penny stock, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any penny stock for a period of twelve months, effective on the second Monday following the entry of this Order.
D. Respondent Hughes be, and hereby is, suspended from association in a supervisory capacity with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or nationally recognized statistical rating organization for a period of four months. The foregoing suspension shall be effective on the second Monday following the entry of this Order, except that the four month suspension from association in a supervisory capacity with any broker or dealer shall be effective on September 5, 2011.
E. Respondent Divine shall, within 10 days of the entry of this Order, pay disgorgement of $33,762 and prejudgment interest of $6,921 and a civil money penalty in the amount of $60,000 to the United States Treasury. If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to SEC Rule of Practice 600 and 31 U.S.C. § 3717. If any payment is not made by the date the payment is required by this Order, the entire outstanding balance of disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties, plus any additional interest accrued pursuant to SEC Rule of Practice 600 or pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717, shall be due and payableimmediately, without further application. Payment shall be: (A) made by wire transfer, United States postal money order, certified check, bank cashier's check or bank money order; (B) made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission; (C) hand-delivered or mailed to the Office of Financial Management, Securities and Exchange Commission, Operations Center, 100 F Street NE, Stop 6042, Washington, DC 20549; and (D) submitted under cover letter that identifies Divine as a Respondent in these proceedings, the file number of these proceedings, a copy of which cover letter and wire transfer, money order or check shall be sent to Gerald Hodgkins, Associate Director, Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F St., N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549-6109.
F. Respondent Hughes shall pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $25,000 to the United States Treasury. The penalty shall be paid in quarterly installments of $6,250 each, beginning within 10 days of entry of this Order. The final payment shall be made within 364 days of entry of this Order. If any payment is not made by the date the payment is required by this Order, the entire outstanding balance of civil penalties, plus any additional interest accrued pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717, shall be due and payable immediately, without further application. If timely payment is not made, additional interest shall accrue pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717. Such payment shall be: (A) made by wire transfer, United States postal money order, certified check, bank cashier's check or bank money order; (B) made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission; (C) hand-delivered or mailed to the Office of Financial Management, Securities and Exchange Commission, Operations Center, 100 F Street NE, Stop 6042, Washington, DC 20549; and (D) submitted under cover letter that identifies Hughes as a Respondent in these proceedings, the file number of these proceedings, a copy of which cover letter and wire transfer, money order or check shall be sent to Gerald Hodgkins, Associate Director, Division of Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F St., N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549-6109.
G. Such civil money penalties may be distributed pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (“Fair Fund distribution”). Regardless of whether any such Fair Fund distribution is made, amounts ordered to be paid as civil money penalties pursuant to this Order shall be treated as penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Respondents agree that in any Related Investor Action, they shall not argue that they are entitled to, nor shall they benefit by, offset or reduction of any award of compensatory damages by the amount of any part of Respondents’ payment of a civil penalty in this action ("Penalty Offset"). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such a Penalty Offset, Respondents agree that they shall, within 30 days after entry of a final order granting the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission's counsel in this action and pay the amount of the Penalty Offset to the United States Treasury or to a Fair Fund, as the Commission directs. Such a payment shall not be deemed an additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty imposed in this proceeding. For purposes of this paragraph, a "Related Investor Action" means a private damages action brought against Respondent by or on behalf of one or more investors based on substantially the same facts as alleged in the Order instituted by the Commission in this proceeding.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M.Murphy
Well, add this to my dead pile....
...Not much to do. This isn't a typical dirty shell, with a long record of promotion and scamsters... although adot has the albatross of fraud about it. With the astronomical, incredibly silly stupid chance that someone could do something with the ticker adot and RM (yea right) I've held all my crap anyhow... I don't make enough to qualify for write offs......
Please do... these scams need to pay!!!
Bad! another fraud bites the dust! What next? I've many shares of this scam!
ADOT : SEC Filing :
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2011/lr21967.htm
You got a good point, good luck
Welp, we were spot on on the concept, just off planet on the start up. Happens everyday. We can only beat ourselves up so much. I've made my money back on other scam flips so it's not too bad.
My rule is pink stock is not an investment, it's a flip play not to be held beyond a 5% loss - period.
Even Gway/Fncx isn't looking like a good investment over there and they had a so-called big name hype....
Works for me.
gltu
To funny, that is exactly why I bought this stock many years ago. I thought the concept was going to be a real money maker.
Ditto thanks. It wouldn't be so bad if I didn't have to look at all those super bright billboards every day going to work. lol.
Did you know that the animated billboard industry has been battling Michigan government to place those things? I'm not totally up on it anymore, but Michigan has been trying to prevent new giant billboards from being allowed to add to whats already there so this newer industry has been in litigation to go around that. They may have that all solved by now maybe.
The best 'AB' for short, had been able to do is to replace pre existing sign locations and were not allowed so far to place newer locations. County and city regs are more hurdles. But as you can see, it's working. One sign is an incredible revenue stream compared to the single board concept and when you're talking that kind of money, no government nor stream or wildlife will stand a chance to stop that profit from happening. Money talks and trashes what it wants...
glta
I got taken for many dollars. I fell all of your pain.
In my business, I knew about the led/video advertising billboards before the first one went up. I couldn't afford stock in the companies truly accomplishing this so I was investigating start ups in the same field... Adot spammed all the right names AND an engineer at my best friends engineering work 'lol' also was buying adot. 3 engineers there including my friend were taken for thousands. I realize now, all those guys had less experience in pink stock at the time than I had. These aren't stupid people. We all knew this was happening and wanted a startup with a lower pps to ride.....
Hard first lesson. My best friend 'listened' to his work friend and dropped 5,000 in 'investment' money on adot. Something didn't quite click with me as I couldn't substantiate all the names in the PR's, but still dropped 700 bucks throughout that year.
You can look back at the Adot board years ago, and with todays experience in spotting scams and promoters on chat boards, it's so painfully obvious to recognize it just makes one want to stick a pen up their nose and twist.
I haven't even looked if adot is showing on the greys yet.
I think the only hope here is either catch a new pump and someone will pick up your called in grey trade or someone uses the shell for a new scam and one isn't R/S'd-*R/M'd to oblivion and can unload on the next sheeple.
*R/M = The pink scam CEO's Reverse Merge/IPO for penny stocks.
glta
Adot's original market was going to be HD video advertising. The idea was to replace the bill boards targeting changeable screens based on time of day and what drivers may want to due at that time.
Driving to work in the morning may have an add for a coffee and egg mufflin at McDonald's. Coming home after work, maybe a dinner or some other activity for the evening.
Next idea was a Vegas HD billboard, then came a report of a HD small screen for the army.
All a bunch of BS, nothing ever happened to any of these idea's. I'm a bagholder from way back
Gmed was the other company Adot was purported to be in partners with....Gmed stock was revoked completely 4-10-2010.
So that plan didn't pan out either. Hoping some miracle in the greys when adot opens back up to 'trade'
http://otcbb.com/asp/dailylist_detail.asp?mkt_ctg=NON-OTCBB&d=04/08/2010
Adot was supposed to supply small size screens for gmed and other medical or medical research companies, or so they said.
I would have to find all my old research since I've been in Adot since at least 2004. Maybe even longer....
I don't believe Adot ever split, or changed it's name.
There was a time Adot was involved in another attempted subsidy called I think Gemd.
Adot will come back on the grey market listing.
No bid/ask and must call in trades.
Unless Adot gets flat out revoked.
Recent News Headlines for Advanced Optics Electronics Inc
ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS - In the Matter of Divine Capital Markets, LLC, Danielle Hughes, and Michael Buonomo
1 days 21 hours 25 minutes ago - FGI via Comtex
FIND Government Press Releases
On Feb. 25, 2011, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8(A) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against registered broker-dealer Divine Capital Markets, LLC; its former registered representative, Michael Buonomo, 36 of Wood-Ridge, New Jersey and its CEO and majority owner Danielle Hughes, 41, of Jersey City, New Jersey.
The Division of Enforcement alleges in the Order that Buonomo and Divine participated in the unregistered offer and sale of over 9.8 billion shares of Advanced Optics Electronics, Inc. The Order alleges that beginning in February 2006, Buonomo established an account on behalf of JDC Swan Inc., a Florida corporation controlled by Jason Claffey, for the purpose of liquidating bulletin board and pink sheet companies. From approximately February 28, 2006 through June 2007, Divine and Buonomo publicly offered and sold over 9.8 billion shares of ADOT for over $2 million on behalf JDC Swan. According to the Order there was no effective registration statement pertaining to the offers and sales, and no valid exemptions from registration.
The Order also alleges that Danielle Hughes, Divine's CEO, ignored red flags and failed to maintain adequate supervisory procedures that would have detected and prevented the registration violations.
The Division of Enforcement alleges that through their conduct, Divine and Buonomo willfully violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act and that Divine and Hughes failed reasonably to supervise Buonomo with a view to detecting and preventing his violations of the Securities Act.
An administrative hearing will be scheduled to determine whether the allegations in the Order are true, and to provide Divine, Hughes and Buonomo an opportunity to establish any defenses to the allegations. The proceedings also will determine whether remedial sanctions should be imposed. As directed by the Commission, the administrative law judge shall issue an initial decision in this matter no later than 300 days from the date of service of the Order. (Rel. 34-63980; File No. 3-14274)
Aww crap, another one of my pooppiles bites the dust.....not too surprised with this one...
next greys, and this time I'm finally going to call my broker and put in a sell order.....
But ... I think that basically this is a clean shell so it's a lightning strike chance somebody is looking for a R/M. I hate saying that because it sounds like a pump. But this POS was my first and biggest mistake before I became aware of the stinky pinky games and I would love to get some money back......
Also, these guys where involved (in a PR way) with another company I think called GEMD or something.....
SEC Administrative Proceeding to explain the Suspension :
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2011/34-64001.pdf
ADOT Suspended
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2011/34-64000.pdf
ok...ok... something up... lol...
There has been NO volume and till a few day ago - ACTITIVE ! lol... today alone was over 3 million and a few days ago lots more.
I want answers MR. !!!!
Hey Max,,,
I was there in from of my computer and I got soooooooo excited and I also crapped myself... (j/k) I was like....ohhhh bboyyyyy.... and some idiot sold a few shares at .0001 --- I wanted to kill them..hahahahahahah............
I want it to go back up.. with lots more volume.
I think they had some past great products. I guess its when they didn't get that Gov contract - it was game over ??? And in 1996 or so... they had the 1st Outdoors LCD TV with Better Image then all of then today ???
And the lawsuit against the other company didnt help much. ETC
------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTN ADOT
If anyone works for ADOT = Please help support your investors with some type of feedback on what cooking. We believe in YOU !!!
I think we all should just wait. We all paid money and in our minds the money gone.
But, It could be the sleeping giant. LOL... I would think if a stock is not traded enough then it get written off by the Stock Listing Company ? ? ? SEC ?
Its not doing a Reverse split - cus they don't need money ?
Something is up ? LOL.... I wonder what they are planning. They must be doing something Top SECRET or something. And they are planning to come out with something soon ? I hope !!!!
I mean 0.0003. Sorry about that
It did go to 0.003 briefly.
http://www.quotemedia.com/results.php?qm_page=14980&qm_symbol=adot
check 3 month chart.
Traded 10 million plus today.
I was going to just write them off but decided to wait another year.
Ya..
Something is cooking on the back burner. Its like NASA - lol or Area 51.... Nobody knows nothing. LOL...
Ya... We need to find out whats up? We need this highly potential stock moving again.
Its a shame its not trading.
As they say - "Where do we go from here" ???
Well that would sure be something if they had anything going on. Would be a great way to start 2011.
I'll say one thing, I'm surprised they never declared bamkrupcy.
PACK10:
I ready think something is going on behind closed doors; on several ocassions last month and this month trades were 100M and 78M out of the blue. This is just my opinion and I can't find anything with my DD.
George
This POS isn't going anywhere. A number of years back a friend of mine went to their location and couldn't even find anybody around the place. Sure I'd like it to go up, but I have no hope at all.
LoL...
Just like that 90's group "Salt & Pepper" - Pump it reall good - hahahah
Lets this baby - fly to the sky......
Sounds good to me pump it.
As long as the help me get my money back. - who cares? lol I hope they do pump this up... Since Adot not doing it on its own. Right ?
MM's playing game trying to pump this crap maybe.
Do the former MOD
Someone playing games on this stock. Not the trader, who ever controls the ticker.
New Volume numbers went from 4.9 million to 3.9 million and it said the high was .0001. I saw the trade at 3:12:40 for 960,000 at .0003.
Somethings up ?
What is going on ? It went to .0003 and the bid was .0001. ... I had this stock for 4 years and I dont care what makes it move. I just want my money back. I used to believe this was a great company. 5 million shares at .0003. My heart is racing. lol
its a penny stock .PK = pink sheets, there will be no delisting its not on the Nasdaq.
I would think ADOT will be delisted at some point. Im very surprised it hasn't happened already.
Followers
|
37
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
693
|
Created
|
10/10/03
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |