InvestorsHub Logo

SHLOMO HERBIVOWITZ

12/11/12 9:38 AM

#17416 RE: ehwest #17415

Nice try, dude. But you are wrong. If you read patent 336, Grewals ruling is word for word what is specified in the patent text.This particular ring oscillator design is variable by temperature. The temperature controls the speed of the ring, because of the voltage/current ohms law anomaly. Of course the plantiff wanted "noncontrollable" in there. Again, you are trying to confuse what really went on by obfuscation, just like the the plaintiffs lawyers have tried to do for the past 6 years. Keep reading the patent, maybe you will understand what is actually happening there.....

Showmeethemoney

12/11/12 9:50 AM

#17419 RE: ehwest #17415

We (((LOST))) the claim False claim, totally.

Prudent Capitalist

12/11/12 10:28 AM

#17421 RE: ehwest #17415

Say what? What are you reading that leads you to claim that PTSC lost the Markman hearing? And, from which law school did you receive your degree?